create a website

Does sustainable corporate governance have an impact on materiality disclosure quality in integrated reporting? International evidence. (2022). Velte, Patrick.
In: Sustainable Development.
RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:30:y:2022:i:6:p:1655-1670.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 4

Citations received by this document

Cites: 75

References cited by this document

Cocites: 34

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Sustainable development goals: Sustainability reporting challenges in the United Arab Emirates context. (2024). Elmassri, Moataz ; Samaan, Ahmed Shaker ; Elrazaz, Tariq.
    In: Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:4:p:3100-3114.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Archival research on sustainability‐related executive compensation. A literature review of the status quo and future improvements. (2024). Velte, Patrick.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:4:p:3119-3147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Executive legal background and quality of corporate accounting disclosure. (2024). Wang, YU ; Zhang, Shan.
    In: International Review of Economics & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:reveco:v:96:y:2024:i:pa:s1059056024005318.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Can the innovation in sustainability disclosures reflect organisational sustainable development? An integrated reporting perspective from China. (2023). Sun, Yanqi.
    In: Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:31:y:2023:i:3:p:1668-1680.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Baraibar‐Diez, E., & Odriozola, M. D. (2019). CSR committees and their effect on ESG performance in UK, France, Germany, and Spain. Sustainability, 11, 5077.

  2. Barth, J. R., Caprio, G., & Levine, R. (2004). Bank regulation and supervision: What works best? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13, 205–248.

  3. Bebchuk, L. A., Cremers, K. J. M., & Peyer, U. C. (2011). The CEO pay slice. Journal of Financial Economics, 102, 199–221.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Bebchuk, L., & Fried, J. (2006). Pay without performance. Overview of the issues. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 5–24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Bell, A., & Jones, K. (2015). Explaining fixed effects: Random effects modeling of time‐series cross‐sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods, 3, 133–153.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  6. Ben‐Amar, W., & McIlkenny, P. (2015). Board effectiveness and the voluntary disclosure of climate change information. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24, 704–719.

  7. Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. The Free Press; Macmillan.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter‐account of A and A + GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1036–1071.

  9. Campbell, K., & Mínguez‐Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 435–451.

  10. Chelli, M., & Gendron, Y. (2013). Sustainability ratings and the disciplinary power of the ideology of numbers. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 187–203.

  11. de Villiers, C., Rinaldi, L., & Unerman, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27, 1042–1067.

  12. Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1997). The materiality of environmental information to users of annual reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10, 562–583.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  13. Dingwerth, K., & Eichinger, M. (2010). Tamed transparency: How information disclosure under the global reporting initiative fails to empower. Global Environmental Politics, 10, 74–96.

  14. Dumay, J., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J., & Demartini, P. (2016). Integrated reporting: A structured literature review. Accounting Forum, 40, 166–185.

  15. Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2015). The integrated reporting movement. Meaning, momentum, motives, and materiality. Wiley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  16. Elsayih, J., Tang, Q., & Lan, Y.‐C. (2018). Corporate governance and carbon transparency: Australian evidence. Accounting Research Journal, 31, 405–422.

  17. Endrikat, J., de Villiers, C., Guenther, T. W., & Guenther, E. M. (2021). Board characteristics and corporate social responsibility: A meta‐analytic investigation. Business & Society, 60, 2099–2135.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  18. Evans, L., & Schwartz, J. (2014). The effect of concentration and regulation on audit fees: An application of panel data techniques. Journal of Empirical Finance, 27, 130–144.

  19. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross‐section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 47, 427–465.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  20. Fasan, M., & Mio, C. (2017). Fostering stakeholder engagement: The role of materiality disclosure in integrated reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, 288–305.

  21. Fernandez‐Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz‐Blanco, S. (2014). Women on boards: Do they affect sustainability reporting? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21, 351–364.

  22. Flower, J. (2015). The international integrated reporting council: A story of failure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 1–17.

  23. Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., & Sinclair‐Desgagné, B. (2008). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 83–95.

  24. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  25. Frias‐Aceituno, J. V., Rodriguez‐Ariza, L., & Garcia‐Sanchez, I. M. (2013). The role of the board in the dissemination of integrated corporate social reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20, 219–233.

  26. Fu, R., Tang, Y., & Chen, G. (2020). Chief sustainability officers and corporate social (ir)responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 41, 656–680.

  27. Garcia Martin, C. J., & Herrero, B. (2020). Do board characteristics affect environmental performance? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27, 74–94.

  28. Garcia‐Sanchez, I.‐M., Aibar‐Guzman, C., Nunez‐Torrado, M., & Aibar‐Guzman, B. (2022). Are institutional investors “in love” with the sustainable development goals? Understanding the idyll in the case of government and pension funds. Sustainable Development.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Garcia‐Sánchez, I.‐M., Raimo, N., & Vitolla, F. (2021). CEO power and integrated reporting. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29, 908–942.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Gerwanski, J., Kordsachia, O., & Velte, P. (2019). Determinants of materiality disclosure quality in integrated reporting: Empirical evidence from an international setting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28, 750–770.

  31. Habib, A., & Hossain, M. (2013). CEO/CFO characteristics and financial reporting quality. Research in Accounting Regulation, 25, 88–100.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  32. Haji, A. A., & Anifowose, M. (2016). Audit committee and integrated reporting practice: Does internal assurance matter? Managerial Auditing Journal, 31, 915–948.

  33. Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory. Academy of Management Review, 32, 334–343.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  35. Hammond, K., & Miles, S. (2004). Assessing quality assessment of corporate social reporting: UKperspectives. Accounting Forum, 28, 61–79.

  36. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251–1271.

  37. Helfaya, A., & Moussa, T. (2017). Do board's corporate social responsibility strategy and orientation influence environmental sustainability disclosure? UKevidence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, 1061–1077.

  38. Higgins, C., Stubbs, W., & Love, T. (2014). Walking the talk(s): Organisational narratives of integrated reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27, 1090–1119.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Hofstede, G. (1983). National cultures revisited. Behavior Science Research, 18, 285–305.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  40. Holder‐Webb, L., Cohen, J. R., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2009). The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among U.S. firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 497–527.

  41. Howitt, R. (2018). ‘Encouraging’ new EU guidelines for integrated reporting by European businesses. Business Chief. https://europe.businesschief.com/finance/1358/Encouraging-new-EU-guidelines-for-integrated-reporting-by-European-businesses.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Hummel, K., & Schlick, C. (2016). The relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure – Reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy theory. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35, 455–476.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. IIRC (2013a). The International <IR> Framework. http://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/13-12-08-THE-INTERNATIONAL-IR-FRAMEWORK-2-1.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. IIRC (2021). International <IR> Framework. https://www.integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/InternationalIntegratedReportingFramework.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  45. Jansson, M., & Biel, A. (2011). Motives to engage in sustainable investment: A comparison between institutional and private investors. Sustainable Development, 19, 135–142.

  46. Jones, J. J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29, 193–228.

  47. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  48. Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., & Siddiqui, J. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 207–223.

  49. Kilic, M., & Kuzey, C. (2019). The effect of corporate governance on carbon emission disclosures. Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 11, 35–53.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  50. Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39, 163–197.

  51. Lai, A., Melloni, G., & Stacchezzini, R. (2016). Corporate sustainable development: Is ‘integrated reporting’ a legitimation strategy? Business Strategy and the Environment, 25, 165–177.

  52. Marrone, A. (2020). Corporate governance variables and integrated reporting. International Journal of Business and Management, 15, 26–36.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. McGuire, J., Dow, S., & Argheyd, K. (2003). CEO incentives and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 341–359.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  54. Muttakin, M. B., Khan, A., & Mihret, D. G. (2018). The effect of board capital and CEO power on corporate social responsibility disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 41–56.

  55. Pistoni, A., Songini, L., & Bavagnoli, F. (2018). Integrated reporting quality: An empirical analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25, 489–507.

  56. Pucheta‐Martinez, M. C., & Chiva‐Ortells, C. (2018). The role of directors representing institutional ownership in sustainable development through corporate social responsibility reporting. Sustainable Development, 26, 835–846.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 327–347.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  58. Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 351–366.

  59. Rodrigue, M., Magnan, M., & Cho, C. H. (2013). Is environmental governance substantive or symbolic? An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 107–129.

  60. Romero, S., Ruiz, S., & Fernandez‐Feijoo, B. (2018). Sustainability reporting and stakeholder engagement in Spain: Different instruments, different quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27, 23.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  61. Ruigrok, W., Peck, S., & Tacheva, S. (2007). Nationality and gender diversity on Swiss corporate Boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15, 546–557.

  62. Sethi, S. P., Rovenpor, J. L., & Demir, M. (2017). Enhancing the quality of reporting in corporate social responsibility guidance documents: The roles of ISO 26000, global reporting initiative and CSR‐sustainability monitor. Business Society Review, 122, 139–163.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  63. Sheikh, S. (2019). An examination of the dimensions of CEO power and corporate social responsibility. Review of Accounting and Finance, 18, 221–244.

  64. Sierra‐García, L., Zorio‐Grima, A., & García‐Benau, M. A. (2015). Stakeholder engagement, corporate social responsibility and integrated reporting: An exploratory study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22, 286–304.

  65. Simnett, R., & Huggins, A. L. (2015). Integrated reporting and assurance: Where can research add value? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6, 29–53.

  66. Songini, L., Pistoni, A., Tettamanzi, P., Fratini, F., & Minutiello, V. (2021). Integrated reporting quality and BoD characteristics: An empirical analysis. Journal of Management and Governance.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  67. Stubbs, W., & Higgins, C. (2018). Stakeholders' perspectives on the role of regulatory reform in integrated reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 147, 489–508.

  68. Vaz, N., Fernandez‐Feijoo, B., & Ruiz, S. (2016). Integrated reporting: An international overview. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25, 577–591.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Velte, P. (2016). Sustainable management compensation and ESG performance. The German case. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 14, 17–24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  70. Velte, P., & Stawinoga, M. (2017). Integrated reporting: The current state of empirical research, limitations and future research implications. Journal of Management Control, 28, 275–320.

  71. Veprauskaite, E., & Adams, M. (2013). Do powerful chief executives influence the financial performance of UKfirms? The British Accounting Review, 45, 229–241.

  72. Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., & Rubino, M. (2020). Board characteristics and integrated reporting quality: An agency theory perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27, 1152–1163.

  73. Wang, R., Zhou, S., & Wang, T. (2020). Corporate governance, integrated reporting and the use of credibility‐enhancing mechanisms on integrated reports. European Accounting Review, 29, 631–663.

  74. Whitelock, V. G. (2019). Multidimensional environmental social governance sustainability framework: Integration, using a purchasing, operations, and supply chain management context. Sustainable Development, 27, 923–931.

  75. Winschel, J., & Stawinoga, M. (2019). Determinants and effects of sustainable CEO compensation. Management Review Quarterly, 69, 265–328.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and firm performance: Moderating role of board gender diversity and sustainability committee. (2025). Hao, Yunhong ; Alodat, Ahmad Yuosef.
    In: Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:1:p:636-651.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. How can corporate digital responsibility (CDR) be measured in line with corporate social responsibility (CSR)? A new theoretical approach in construction 4.0. (2025). Traverso, Marzia ; Weberlewerenz, Bianca.
    In: Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:1:p:287-308.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Corporate underinvestment and its effects on environmental, social, and governance performance. (2025). Cao, Mingyao ; Duan, Keyi ; Ibrahim, Haslindar.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04443-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Exploring corporate social responsibility practices in the telecommunications, broadcasting and courier sectors: a comparative industry analysis. (2025). Saidi, Normaizatul Akma ; Mohd, Naziatul Aziah ; Hassan, Suziana ; Nizam, Mohamad Syahrul ; Lee, Khai Ern.
    In: Palgrave Communications.
    RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04668-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Empirical analysis of workers perceptions of ESG impacts on corporate sustainability performance: A methodological innovation combining the PLS-SEM, PROMETHEE-ROC and FIMIX-PLS methods. (2025). Morioka, Sandra Naomi ; Barbosa, Aglaucibelly Maciel ; de Souza, Anrafel ; Alencar, Lucas Miguel ; Crispim, Maria Cristina ; da Silva, Luiz Bueno ; Norte, Jonhatan Magno.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:215:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525001222.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The impact of performance feedback on corporate ESG performance: Mediating role of environmental strategy. (2024). Lin, Xiaoxing ; Ren, Changman.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0298471.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The relationship between heterogeneous institutional investors’ shareholdings and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China. (2024). Mai, Yong ; Liu, Yang ; Jin, Xiao Meng ; Ly, Kim Cuong.
    In: Research in International Business and Finance.
    RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:71:y:2024:i:c:s0275531924002502.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The industry peer effect of enterprise ESG performance: the moderating effect of customer concentration. (2024). Zhao, Tianjiao ; Wang, Hanyu.
    In: International Review of Economics & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:reveco:v:92:y:2024:i:c:p:1499-1525.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The Sustainability committee and environmental disclosure: International evidence. (2024). Drobetz, Wolfgang ; el Ghoul, Sadok ; Guedhami, Omrane ; Driss, Hamdi.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:221:y:2024:i:c:p:602-625.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The impact of a CSR committee on CSR performance. (2024). Sasaki, Ryo ; Kubo, Katsuyuki.
    In: Japan and the World Economy.
    RePEc:eee:japwor:v:71:y:2024:i:c:s092214252400032x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Local environmental organizations and long-term investor value appropriation. (2024). Wang, Kainan ; Doan, Gia Han ; Chung, Chune Young.
    In: International Review of Financial Analysis.
    RePEc:eee:finana:v:95:y:2024:i:pb:s1057521924004381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Water usage reduction and CSR committees: Taiwan evidence. (2023). Chen, Yulin ; Huang, Meichu.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:30:y:2023:i:3:p:1070-1081.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Sustainability Targets in Executive Remuneration Contracts and Corporate Sustainability Performance in the United Kingdom and European Union. (2023). Ullah, Subhan ; Thuc, Hien Thi ; My, Hanh Thi ; Hameed, Affan.
    In: Environment Systems and Decisions.
    RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:43:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10669-023-09901-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Understanding the Evolution of Environment, Social and Governance Research: Novel Implications From Bibliometric and Network Analysis. (2023). Zhang, Yifang ; Singh, Amit Kumar.
    In: Evaluation Review.
    RePEc:sae:evarev:v:47:y:2023:i:2:p:350-386.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria: their impacts on corporate sustainability performance. (2023). Souza, Vinicius Fernandes ; Morioka, Sandra Naomi ; Basilio, Maria Cristina ; Silva, Luiz Bueno ; Barbosa, Anrafel Souza.
    In: Palgrave Communications.
    RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-01919-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Triple Bottom Line, Sustainability, and Economic Development: What Binds Them Together? A Bibliometric Approach. (2023). Gomes, Sofia ; Lopes, Joo M ; Nogueira, Elisabete.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6706-:d:1124394.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Investigating the Factors That Determine the ESG Disclosure Practices in Europe. (2023). Morris, Rebecca ; Helfaya, Akrum ; Aboud, Ahmed.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5508-:d:1103019.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. How Does Intelligent Manufacturing Affect the ESG Performance of Manufacturing Firms? Evidence from China. (2023). Mohd, Nur Ashikin ; Sun, Lipeng.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:2898-:d:1059077.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Social Performance Disclosed by European Companies: The Role of the Board Attributes and the Country’s Legal System. (2023). Pereira, Claudia ; Cepeda, Catarina ; Silva, Amelia ; Monteiro, Albertina Paula.
    In: JRFM.
    RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:6:p:284-:d:1155136.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Modeling board governance, environmental expertise, and social engagement effects on firm environmental performance: Panel data evidence. (2023). Salterio, Steven E ; Marin, Michael J ; Richardson, Gordon D ; Kim, Daehyun ; Tsang, Albert.
    In: Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jocaae:v:19:y:2023:i:2:s1815566923000140.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Does sustainable corporate governance have an impact on materiality disclosure quality in integrated reporting? International evidence. (2022). Velte, Patrick.
    In: Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:30:y:2022:i:6:p:1655-1670.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Alignment Versus Monitoring: An Examination of the Effect of the CSR Committee and CSR-Linked Executive Compensation on CSR Performance. (2022). Smaili, Nadia ; Radu, Camelia.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:180:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-021-04904-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Does ESG Disclosure Influence Firm Performance?. (2022). Pulino, Silvia Carnini ; Ciaburri, Mirella ; Nasta, Luigi ; Magnanelli, Barbara Sveva.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7595-:d:844981.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Board Characteristics and Integrated Reporting Strategy: Does Sustainability Committee Matter?. (2022). Abdullah, Zaimah ; Qaderi, Sumaia Ayesh ; Chandren, Sitraselvi ; Abdulraheem, Belal Ali ; Hashed, Abdulwahid Ahmed.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6092-:d:817637.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. ESG disclosure and Firm performance: A bibliometric and meta analysis. (2022). Khan, Muhammad Arif.
    In: Research in International Business and Finance.
    RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:61:y:2022:i:c:s0275531922000563.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. To green or not to green: The influence of board characteristics on carbon emissions. (2022). Priberny, Christopher ; Kreuzer, Christian.
    In: Finance Research Letters.
    RePEc:eee:finlet:v:49:y:2022:i:c:s1544612322003014.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. The effect of environmental, social and governance risks. (2022). Cepni, Oguzhan ; Dogru, Tarik ; Ozdemir, Ozgur ; Yilmaz, Muhammed Hasan ; Akyildirim, Erdinc ; Sharma, Abhinav.
    In: Annals of Tourism Research.
    RePEc:eee:anture:v:95:y:2022:i:c:s0160738322000834.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Carbon Emission Regulation, Green Boards, and Corporate Environmental Responsibility. (2021). Song, Seyeong ; Jung, Hail.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4463-:d:537504.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Does CSR Governance Improve Social Sustainability and Reduce the Carbon Footprint: International Evidence from the Energy Sector. (2021). Noreen, Umara ; Tahir, Muhammad Sohail ; Saeed, Asif ; Azam, Akbar.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3596-:d:523040.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Financial Performance of Listed Companies in Thailand. (2021). Dungtripop, Wilawan ; Swatdikun, Trairong ; Lakkanawanit, Pankaewta ; Suttipun, Muttanachai.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8920-:d:611306.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR-related outcomes? A structured literature review based on empirical-quantitative research findings. (2020). Velte, Patrick ; Stawinoga, Martin.
    In: Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung.
    RePEc:spr:jmgtco:v:31:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s00187-020-00308-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Il ruolo dei comitati di responsabilità sociale nella corporate governance. (2020). Fornasari, Tommaso.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:111192.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. How Does Board Gender Diversity Influence the Likelihood of Becoming a UN Global Compact Signatory? The Mediating Effect of the CSR Committee. (2020). Colakoglu, Nese ; Eryilmaz, Mehmet ; Martinez-Ferrero, Jennifer.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4329-:d:362721.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. How to Lead the Board of Directors to a Sustainable Development of Business with the CSR Committees. (2019). Gennari, Francesca.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:6987-:d:295282.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-01 17:15:56 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.