- Adamowicz, V., & Boxall, P. (2001). Future directions of stated choice methods for environment valuation. In Choice experiments: A new approach to environmental valuation (pp. 1–6). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ágoston, C., Balázs, B., Mónus, F., & Varga, A. (2024). Age differences and profiles in pro‐environmental behavior and eco‐emotions. International Journal of Behavioral Development 01650254231222436, 48, 132–144.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Alajärvi, L., Lehtimäki, A.‐V., Timonen, J., & Martikainen, J. (2022). Willingness to pay for implementation of an environmentally friendly pharmaceutical policy in Finland—A discrete choice experiment study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 6535.
- Anderson, K. C., Stern, M. J., & Powell, R. B. (2024). Investigating the influence of preparation and perceived adult support on student attendance to a residential environmental education program. Environmental Education Research, 30(2), 251–264.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ando, A. W., Cadavid, C. L., Netusil, N. R., & Parthum, B. (2020). Willingness‐to‐volunteer and stability of preferences between cities: Estimating the benefits of stormwater management. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 99, 102274.
Badole, S. B., Bird, S., Heintzelman, M. D., & Legault, L. (2024). Willingness to pay for solar adoption: Economic, ideological, motivational, and demographic factors. Energy Economics, 136, 107703.
- Barak, B., & Katz, D. (2015). Valuing instream and riparian aspects of stream restoration–a willingness to tax approach. Land Use Policy, 45, 204–212.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Baskaran, R., Cullen, R., & Colombo, S. (2010). Testing different types of benefit transfer in valuation of ecosystem services: New Zealand winegrowing case studies. Ecological Economics, 69(5), 1010–1022.
- Bateman, I. J., Day, B. H., Jones, A. P., & Jude, S. (2009). Reducing gain–loss asymmetry: A virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change. Journal of environmental economics and management, 58(1), 106–118.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bateman, I., & Großbritannien, D. (2002). Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: a manual. Edward Elgar Cheltenham.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Behmel, S., Damour, M., Ludwig, R., & Rodriguez, M. J. (2018). Participative approach to elicit water quality monitoring needs from stakeholder groups–An application of integrated watershed management. Journal of environmental management, 218, 540–554.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Blanco, E., Haller, T., & Walker, J. M. (2018). Provision of environmental public goods: Unconditional and conditional donations from outsiders. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 92, 815–831.
Börger, T., & Hattam, C. (2017). Motivations matter: Behavioural determinants of preferences for remote and unfamiliar environmental goods. Ecological Economics, 131, 64–74.
Brouwer, R. (2008). The potential role of stated preference methods in the water framework directive to assess disproportionate costs. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51, 597–614.
- Brouwer, R., & Navrud, S. (2015). The use and development of benefit transfer in Europe. Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values: A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners, 71–83.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Brouwer, R., Bliem, M., Getzner, M., Kerekes, S., Milton, S., Palarie, T., Szerényi, Z., Vadineanu, A., & Wagtendonk, A. (2016). Valuation and transferability of the non‐market benefits of river restoration in the Danube river basin using a choice experiment. Ecological Engineering, 87, 20–29.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Chen, W. Y., & Cho, F. H. T. (2019). Environmental information disclosure and societal preferences for urban river restoration: Latent class modelling of a discrete‐choice experiment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1294–1306.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Danley, B., Sandorf, E. D., & Campbell, D. (2021). Putting your best fish forward: Investigating distance decay and relative preferences for fish conservation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 108, 102475.
- De Silva, D. G., Head, T., Pownall, R. A., & Schiller, A. R. (2023). Ecological footprint and willingness to pay for green goods: Evidence from The Netherlands. The Energy Journal, 45, 257–285.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Debrah, J. K., Vidal, D. G., & Dinis, M. A. P. (2021). Raising awareness on solid waste management through formal education for sustainability: A developing countries evidence review. Recycling, 6(1), 6.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Del Saz‐Salazar, S., Hernández‐Sancho, F., & Sala‐Garrido, R. (2009). The social benefits of restoring water quality in the context of the water framework directive: A comparison of willingness to pay and willingness to accept. Science of the Total Environment, 407, 4574–4583.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Faccioli, M., Czajkowski, M., Glenk, K., & Martin‐Ortega, J. (2020). Environmental attitudes and place identity as determinants of preferences for ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 174, 106600.
Farley, J., & Costanza, R. (2010). Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global. Ecological Economics, 69, 2060–2068.
- Ferrini, S., Schaafsma, M., & Bateman, I. (2014). Revealed and stated preference valuation and transfer: A within‐sample comparison of water quality improvement values. Water Resources Research, 50, 4746–4759.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Frederiks, E. R., Stenner, K., & Hobman, E. V. (2015). The socio‐demographic and psychological predictors of residential energy consumption: A comprehensive review. Energies, 8, 573–609.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Galekop, M., Veldwijk, J., Uyl‐de Groot, C., & Redekop, W. (2024). Preferences and willingness to pay for personalized nutrition interventions: Discrete choice experiments in Europe and the United States. Food Quality and Preference, 113, 105075.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gati, I., & Kulcsar, V. (2021). Making better career decisions: From challenges to opportunities. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 126, 103545.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gokhale, C. S., & Park, H. J. (2020). Eco‐evolutionary Spatial Dynamics of Nonlinear Social Dilemmas.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gomez‐Jaramillo, Y., Berrouet, L., Villegas‐Palacio, C., & Berrio‐Giraldo, L. (2024). Conceptual framework for analyzing the sustainability of socio‐ecological systems with a focus on ecosystem services that support water security. Sustainable Development, 32, 2298–2313.
- Grazhdani, D. (2024). Results of two non‐market valuation methods used to estimate recreational fishing in the Lakes Prespa watershed. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism (JEMT), 15, (1 (73)), 52–68.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Greiber, T. (2009). Payments for ecosystem services: Legal and institutional frameworks. IUCN.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hao, Q., Xu, S., Liao, Y., Qiao, D., Shi, H., & Xu, T. (2023). Determinants of residents’ willingness to pay for water quality improvements in Haikou, China: Application of CVM and ISM approaches. Water, 15(7), 1305.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- He, L., Zhang, J., Yu, B., Hu, M., & Zhang, Z. (2024). Assessment of ecosystem health and driving forces in response to landscape pattern dynamics: The Shibing Karst world natural heritage site case study. Heritage Science, 12(1), 182.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hole, A. R. (2007). Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood. The Stata Journal, 7, 388–401.
Hynes, S., Tinch, D., & Hanley, N. (2013). Valuing improvements to coastal waters using choice experiments: An application to revisions of the EU Bathing Waters Directive. Marine Policy, 40, 137–144.
- Javeed, B., Huang, D., Shangguan, D., Ahsan Mukhtar, M., Sajjad, W., Banerjee, A., Yang, Q., & Butt, A. Q. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of national park's policies and laws in promoting biodiversity conservation and ecological development in Pakistan. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1333650.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Johnston, R. J., Boyle, K. J., Adamowicz, W., Bennett, J., Brouwer, R., Cameron, T. A., Hanemann, W. M., Hanley, N., Ryan, M., & Scarpa, R. (2017). Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4, 319–405.
Kaczan, D., Pfaff, A., Rodriguez, L., & Shapiro‐Garza, E. (2017). Increasing the impact of collective incentives in payments for ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 86, 48–67.
- Kang, N., Wang, E., Yu, Y., & Duan, Z. (2021). Valuing recreational services of the national forest parks using a tourist satisfaction method. Forests, 12, 1688.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kataria, M., Bateman, I., Christensen, T., Dubgaard, A., Hasler, B., Hime, S., Ladenburg, J., Levin, G., Martinsen, L., & Nissen, C. (2012). Scenario realism and welfare estimates in choice experiments–a non‐market valuation study on the European water framework directive. Journal of Environmental Management, 94, 25–33.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Khan, I., Zhao, M., Khan, S. U., Yao, L., Ullah, A., & Xu, T. (2018). Spatial heterogeneity of preferences for improvements in river basin ecosystem services and its validity for benefit transfer. Ecological Indicators, 93, 627–637.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Khan, S. U., Guo, X., Hu, J., Khan, A. A., Talpur, M. A., Liu, G., & Zhao, M. (2022). Who cares and how much? Narrative for advances in aquatic ecosystem services through non‐market valuation with spatial dimensions using a discrete choice experiment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 337, 130603.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Khan, S. U., Khan, I., Zhao, M., Chien, H., Lu, Q., Ali, M. A. S., Khan, A. A., & Fahad, S. (2019). Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services: A distance decay approach to quantify willingness to pay for improvements in Heihe River Basin ecosystems. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 25247–25261.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Khan, S., Yao, L., Khan, Z. A., Ali, U., & Zhao, M. (2023). Exploring stakeholder preferences and spatial heterogeneity in policy scenario analysis for vulnerable ecosystems: A choice experiment approach. Ecological Indicators, 153, 110438.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kosenius, A. K., & Markku, O. (2015). Ecosystem benefits from coastal habitats—A three‐country choice experiment. Marine Policy, 58, 15–27.
Kunwar, S. B., Bohara, A. K., & Thacher, J. (2020). Public preference for river restoration in the Danda Basin, Nepal: A choice experiment study. Ecological Economics, 175, 106690.
Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J. (2008). Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making. PharmacoEconomics, 26, 661–677.
- Lehto, C., Hedblom, M., Filyushkina, A., & Ranius, T. (2024). Seeing through their eyes: Revealing recreationists’ landscape preferences through viewshed analysis and machine learning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 248, 105097.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lewis, D. J., Kling, D. M., Dundas, S. J., & Lew, D. K. (2022). Estimating the value of threatened species abundance dynamics. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 113, 102639.
Li, Y., Yao, Z., & Guo, Z. (2023). Willingness to pay and preferences for rural tourism attributes among urban residents: A discrete choice experiment in China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 77, 460–471.
- Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications. Cambridge university press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lu, X., Lu, Z., Mao, J., Sun, Z., Cui, Z., Huang, Y., & Cao, K. (2023). Place attachment as an indicator of public participation in low‐carbon community development: A case study of Beijing, China. Ecological Indicators, 154, 110658.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- McFadden, D., Zarembka, P., 1974. Frontiers in econometrics. 105–142. Academic Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- McPherson, E. G. (1992). Accounting for benefits and costs of urban greenspace. Landscape and Urban Planning, 22, 41–51.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Metcalfe, P. J., Baker, W., Andrews, K., Atkinson, G., Bateman, I. J., Butler, S., Carson, R. T., East, J., Gueron, Y., & Sheldon, R. (2012). An assessment of the nonmarket benefits of the water framework directive for households in England and Wales. Water Resources Research, 48, 1–18.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mohan, C., Robinson, J., Vodwal, L., & Kumari, N. (2024). Sustainable development goals for addressing environmental challenges. In Green chemistry approaches to environmental sustainability (pp. 357–374). Elsevier.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Moody‐Marshall, R. (2023). An investigation of environmental awareness and practice among a sample of undergraduate students in Belize. Environmental Education Research, 29(7), 911–928.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Muhibbullah, M., Afroz, R., & Duasa, J. (2023). Assessing public preferences for solar development: A case study of Selangor state Malaysia. International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies IRJEMS, 2, 533–547.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Mundaca, G. (2024). Economic valuation of environmental and health impacts from mining: The case of Peru. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 2415–2441.
- Obeng, E. A., & Aguilar, F. X. (2018). Value orientation and payment for ecosystem services: Perceived detrimental consequences lead to willingness‐to‐pay for ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Management, 206, 458–471.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pakalniete, K., Aigars, J., Czajkowski, M., Strake, S., Zawojska, E., & Hanley, N. (2017). Understanding the distribution of economic benefits from improving coastal and marine ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment, 584, 29–40.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Parrella, J. A., Leggette, H. R., Lu, P., Wingenbach, G., Baker, M., & Murano, E. (2024). What's the beef with gene editing? An investigation of factors influencing US consumers' acceptance of beef from gene‐edited cattle. Future Foods, 10, 100454.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Paudel, U., Adhikari, S. R., & Pant, K. P. (2023). Willingness to pay for environmental quality improvement programs and its determinants: Empirical analysis in Western Nepal. Sustainability, 15, 2176.
Paudyal, K., Baral, H., & Keenan, R. J. (2018). Assessing social values of ecosystem services in the Phewa Lake Watershed, Nepal. Forest policy and economics, 90, 67–81.
- Pearce, D., & Moran, D. (1996). The economic value of biodiversity. Environmental Values, 5, 89–90.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Pogliani, L., Ronchi, S., Arcidiacono, A., di Martino, V., & Mazza, F. (2023). Regeneration in an ecological perspective. Urban and territorial equalisation for the provision of ecosystem services in the Metropolitan City of Milan. Land Use Policy, 129, 106606.
- Sadhukhan, S., Banerjee, U. K., & Maitra, B. (2018). Preference heterogeneity towards the importance of transfer facility attributes at metro stations in Kolkata. Travel Behaviour and Society, 12, 72–83.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Schirpke, U., Meisch, C., Marsoner, T., & Tappeiner, U. (2018). Revealing spatial and temporal patterns of outdoor recreation in the European Alps and their surroundings. Ecosystem services, 31, 336–350.
- Shahzad, T., Shah, S. T. H., Rais, S. I., Mansoor, A., & Zaman, K. (2022). People's attitude towards willingness‐to‐pay for environmental protection in Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 1–20.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Sheremet, O., Ruokamo, E., Juutinen, A., Svento, R., & Hanley, N. (2018). Incentivising participation and spatial coordination in payment for ecosystem service schemes: Forest disease control programs in Finland. Ecological Economics, 152, 260–272.
- Shi, F., Weaver, D., Zhao, Y., Huang, M. F., Tang, C., & Liu, Y. (2019). Toward an ecological civilization: Mass comprehensive ecotourism indications among domestic visitors to a Chinese wetland protected area. Tourism Management, 70, 59–68.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Shi, L., Maruthaveeran, S., Yusof, M. J. M., & Dai, C. (2024). Exploring factors influencing recreational experiences of urban river corridors based on social media data. Applied Sciences, 14(10), 4086.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Termansen, M., McClean, C. J., & Jensen, F. S. (2013). Modelling and mapping spatial heterogeneity in forest recreation services. Ecological economics, 92, 48–57.
- Toruńczyk‐Ruiz, S., & Martinović, B. (2020). The bright and dark sides of length of residence in the neighbourhood: Consequences for local participation and openness to newcomers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 67, 101383.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Train, K. E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge university press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Unterberger, C., & Olschewski, R. (2021). Determining the insurance value of ecosystems: A discrete choice study on natural hazard protection by forests. Ecological Economics, 180, 106866.
Ureta, J. C., Motallebi, M., Vassalos, M., Seagle, S., & Baldwin, R. (2022). Estimating residents' WTP for ecosystem services improvement in a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program: A choice experiment approach. Ecological Economics, 201, 107561.
- Vallejo‐Torres, L. (2023). The broader opportunity costs in the broader cost‐effectiveness analysis framework. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 21, 373–384.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
van den Bergh, J. C. (2008). Environmental regulation of households: An empirical review of economic and psychological factors. Ecological Economics, 66, 559–574.
- van Dijk, J., Dekker, S. C., Kools, S. A., & van Wezel, A. P. (2023). European‐wide spatial analysis of sewage treatment plants and the possible benefits to nature of advanced treatment to reduce pharmaceutical emissions. Water Research, 241, 120157.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Viswanathan, V. C., & Schirmer, M. (2015). Water quality deterioration as a driver for river restoration: A review of case studies from Asia, Europe and North America. Environmental Earth Sciences, 74, 3145–3158.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Xie, B.‐C., & Zhao, W. (2018). Willingness to pay for green electricity in Tianjin, China: Based on the contingent valuation method. Energy Policy, 114, 98–107.
- Yang, T., Li, Z., Bai, Y., Liu, X., & Ye, T. (2023). Residents' preferences for rural housing disaster insurance attributes in central and Western Tibet. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 14, 1–15.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Zaman‐ul‐Haq, M., He, M., Kanwal, A., Amir, S., Akhtar, N., Saqib, Z., Jamil, A., Alarifi, S. S., Mubbin, M., & Bokhari, S. A. (2024). Remote sensing‐based assessments of socioeconomic factors for urban ecological resilience in the semi‐arid region. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 96, 12–22.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Zeiringer, B., Seliger, C., Greimel, F., & Schmutz, S. (2018). Aquatic ecology series. In S, Schmutz & J. Sendzimir (Eds.), Riverine ecosystem management (Vol. 8, pp. 67–89). Springer.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Zhou, L., de Vries, W. T., Guo, G., Gao, F., & Fang, C. (2024). The effectiveness of voluntary collective action in China's rural land development. Habitat International, 150, 103121.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now