create a website

Using multi criteria decision making in analysis of alternatives for selection of enabling technology. (2013). Mazzuchi, Thomas A ; Sarkani, Shahram ; Georgiadis, Daniel R.
In: Systems Engineering.
RePEc:wly:syseng:v:16:y:2013:i:3:p:287-303.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 83

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. The Legacy of Peter Fishburn: Foundational Work and Lasting Impact. (2023). Simon, Jay ; Hupman, Andrea C.
    In: Decision Analysis.
    RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:20:y:2023:i:1:p:1-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. A future‐oriented approach to the selection of artificial intelligence technologies for knowledge platforms. (2023). Kohler, Thomas.
    In: Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology.
    RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:74:y:2023:i:8:p:905-922.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. A. Afshari, M. Mojahed, and R.M. Yusuff, Simple additive weighting approach to personnel selection problem, Int J Innovation Management Technol 1(5) (2010), 511–514.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  2. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, Eur J Oper Res 2 (1978), 429–444.

  3. A. Kolios, M. Collu, A. Chahardehi, B.P. Brennan, and M.H. Patel, A multi‐criteria decision making method to compare support structures for offshore wind turbines, Eur Wind Energy Conf Exhibition, Warsaw, Poland, 2010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. A.G. Sanfey, Social decision‐making: Insights from game theory and neuroscience, Science 318 (2007), 598–602.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. A.M. Davis, Software requirements, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1993.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. B. Roy and D. Vanderpooten, The European school of MCDA: Emergence, basic features and current works, J Multi‐Criteria Decision Anal 5(1) (1996), 22–38.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. B. Roy, The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods, Theory Decision 31(1) (1991), 49–73.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. B.S. Blanchard, Logistics engineering and management, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. C.A. Bana E Costa and J.C. Vansnick, Applications of the MACBETH approach in the framework of an additive aggregation model, J Multi Criteria Decision Anal 6 (1997), 107–114.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. C.H. Hanks, E.I. Axelband, and S. Linsay, Reexamining military acquisition reform: Are we there yet? RAND, Santa Monica, CA, 2005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. C.J. Hopfe, Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in building performance simulation for decision support and design optimization, Issue 133, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2009, http://alexandria.tue.nl/extra2/200911580.pdf, retrieved November 1, 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  12. C.M. Feng and R.T. Wang, Considering the financial ratios on the performance evaluation of highway bus industry, Transport Rev 21(4) (2001), 49–467.

  13. C.W. Li and G.H. Tzeng, Identification of a threshold value for the DEMATEL method using the maximum mean de‐entropy algorithm to find critical services provided by a semiconductor intellectual property mall, Expert Syst Appl 36(2009), 9891–9898.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. C.Y. Kung and W.L. Wen, Applying grey relational analysis and grey decision making to evaluate the relationship between company attributes and its financial performance ‐ a case study of venture capital enterprises in Taiwan, Decision Support Syst 43 (2007), 842–852.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. D. Kalibatas and K. Turskis, Multi criteria evaluation of inner climate by using MOORA method, Inform Technol Control 37(1) (2008), 79–83.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  16. D.J. Pannell, Sensitivity analysis of normative economic models: Theoretical framework and practical strategies, Agric Econ 16 (1997), 139–152.

  17. D.L. Olson, Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models, Math Comput Model 40(7–8) (2004), 721–727.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. D.M. Buede and D.T. Maxwell, Rank disagreement: A comparison of multi‐criteria methodologies, J Multi‐Criteria Decision Anal 4 (1995), 1–21.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. D.R. Georgiadis, T.A. Mazuchi, and S. Sarkani, Using multi criteria decision making for analysis of alternatives in system design, Natl Defense Indust Assoc (NDIA) Expeditionary Warfare Conf 2700, Panama City, FL, 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. DoD, Department of Defense Instruction, Operation of the Defense Acquisition System, USD (AT&L), DoDI 5000.02, U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, DC, 2008, https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=250027, Retrieved October 10, 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. DoD, DoD Technology Readiness Assessment Guidance, prepared by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering [ASD(R&E)], U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, DC, 2011, https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=461216, retrieved October 12, 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. E. Forman, M.A. Selly, Decision by Objectives: How to convince others that you are right, World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 2001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. E. Triantaphyllou and A. Sanchez, A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multi‐criteria decision making methods, Decision Sci 28(1) (1997), 151–194.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. E. Triantaphyllou and S.H. Mann, An examination of the effectiveness of multi‐dimensional decision‐making methods: A decision‐making paradox, Int J Decision Support Syst 5(3) (1989), 303–312.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. E. Triantaphyllou, B. Shu, S.N. Sanchez, and T. Ray, Multi‐criteria decision making: An operations research approach, Encycl Elect Electron Eng 15 (1998), 175–186.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. E.E. Karsak and S.S. Ahiska, Improved common weight MCDM model for technology selection, Int J Prod Res 46(24) (2008), 6933–6944.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. E.E. Karsak, S. Sozer, and S.E. Alptekin, Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach, Comput Indust Eng 44 (2002), 171–190.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. E.K. Zavadskas, A. Kaklauskas, and T. Vilutiene, Multi criteria evaluation of apartment blocks maintenance contractors: Lithuanian case study, Int J Strategic Property Management 13 (2009), 319–338.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. E.K. Zavadskas, R. Liias, and Z. Turskis, Multi attribute decision making methods for assessment of quality in bridges and road construction: State of the art surveys, Baltic J Road Bridge Eng 13(3) (2008), 152–160.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. F.H. Lofti, R. Fallahnejad, and N. Navidi, Ranking efficient units in DEA by using TOPSIS method, Appl Math Sci 5(17) (2011), 805–815.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  31. G. DeSanctis and G.R. Brent, A foundation for the study of group decision support systems, Management Sci 33(5) (1987), 589–609.

  32. G.H. Tzeng, C.H. Chiang, and C.W. Li, Evaluating intertwined effects in e‐learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL, Expert Syst Appl 32(4) (2007), 1028–1044.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. H. Heerkens, Assessing the importance of factors determining decision‐making by actors involved in innovation processes, Creativity Innovation Management 15(4) (2006), 385–399.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. H. Raiffa, Preferences for multi‐attributed alternatives, Multi‐Criteria Decision Anal 14 (2006), 115–157.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. J. Barzilai and B. Golany, AHP rank reversal normalization and aggregation rules, INFOR 32(2) (1994), 57–64.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott, Multiple criteria decision analysis, State of the Art Surveys, Springer, New York, 2005.

  37. J. Fülöp, Introduction to decision making methods, Laboratory of Operations Research and Decision Systems: Computer and Automation Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences 1, Budapest, 2005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. J. Thakkar, S.G. Deshmukh, A.D. Gupta, and R. Shankar, Development of a balanced scorecard: An integrated approach of Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Analytic Network Process (ANP), Int J Prod Performance Management 56(1) (2006), 25–59.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. J.B. Yang and M.G. Singh, An evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision making with uncertainty, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 24(1) (1994), 1–18.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. J.C. Butler, A.N. Chebeskov, J.S. Dyer, T.A. Edmunds, J. Jia, and V. Oussanov, The use of multi‐attribute utility theory for the evaluation of plutonium disposition options in the United States and Russia. Interfaces 35(1) (2005), 88–101.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. J.P. Brans and P. Vincke, A preference ranking organization method: The PROMETHEE method for MCDM, Management Sci 31 (1985), 647–656.

  42. J.P. Brans, P. Vincke, and B. Mareschal, How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method, Eur J Oper Res 24(2) (1986), 228–238.

  43. J.W. Lee and S.H. Kim, Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection, Comput Oper Res 27 (2000), 367–382.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. K. Borcherding and M. Weber, Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multi‐attribute decision making, Eur J Oper Res 67(1) (1993), 1–12.

  45. K. Yoon, System selection by multiple attribute decision making, Ph.D. Dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 1980.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. K. Yoon, The propagation of errors in multiple‐attribute decision analysis: A practical approach, Oper Res Soc 40(7) (1989), 681–686.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  47. L. Affuso, J. Masson, and D. Newberry, Comparing investments in new transport infrastructure: Roads versus railways? Fiscal Stud 24(3) (2003), 275–315.

  48. L. Ustinovichius, E.K. Zavadskas, and V. Podvezko, Application of a quantitative Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM‐1) approach to the analysis of investments in construction, Control Cybernet 36(1) (2007), 252–268.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. L.M. Shillito and D.J. De Marle, Value: Its measurement, design, and management, Wiley, Toronto, 1992.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  50. M. Tamiz, D. Jones, and C. Romero, Goal programming for decision making: An overview of the current state‐of‐the‐art, Eur J Oper Res 111 (1998), 569–581.

  51. N.R. Jennings, P. Faratin, A.R. Lomuscio, S. Parsons, and M. Wooldridge, Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods, and challenges, Group Decision Negotiation 10 (2001), 199–215.

  52. O.L. Chau and C. Parkan, Selection of a manufacturing process with multiple attributes: A case study, J Eng Technol Management 12 (1995), 219–237.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. P. Hansen and F. Ombler, A new method for scoring additive multi‐attribute value models using pairwise rankings of alternatives, J Multi‐Criteria Decision Anal 15 (2009), 87–107.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. P. Tanadtang and D. Park, Applying evidential reasoning for evaluating transportation demand management schemes: A case study of Bangkok, J Eastern Asia Soc Transportation Stud 5 (2003), 1781–1801.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. P. Vincke, Multi‐criteria decision‐aid, Wiley, Chichester, UK, 2010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  56. P.C. Fishburn, Additive utilities with incomplete product sets: Application to priorities and assignments, Oper Res 15 (1967), 537–542.

  57. P.C. Fishburn, Additivity in utility theory with denumerable product sets, Econometrica 34(2) (1966), 500–503.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  58. P.C. Fishburn, Analysis of decisions with incomplete knowledge of probabilities, Oper Res 13 (1965), 217–237.

  59. P.C. Fishburn, Utility theory, Management Sci 14(5) (1968), 335–378.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. P.P. Bhangale, V.P. Agrawal, and S.K. Saha, Attribute based specification, comparison and selection of a robot, Mechanism Machine Theory 39 (2004), 1345–1366.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. R. Benayoun, J.D. Montgolfier, and J. Tergny, Linear programming with multiple objective functions: Step Method (STEM), Math Program 1 (1971), 366–375.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. R. Simanaviciene and L. Ustinovichius, Sensitivity analysis for quantitative decision making methods: TOPSIS and SAW, Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2(6) (2010), 7743–7744.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. R.D. Holder, Some comments on the analytic hierarchy process, J Oper Res Soc 41(11) (1990), 1073–1076.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  64. R.L. Keeney and H. Raiffa, Decisions with multiple objectives: Performances and value trade‐offs, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1993.

  65. R.L. Keeney, A group preference axiomatization with cardinal utility, Management Sci 23 (1975), 140–145.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. R.L. Nydick and R.P. Hill, Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure, Int J Purchasing Mater Management 28(2) (1992), 31–36.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. R.T. Wang, Performance evaluation method—Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), 2011, researcher.nsc.gov.tw/public/caroljoe/Data/02182133671.ppt, retrieved November 7, 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. S. Balli and S. Korukolu, Operating system selection using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods, Math Comput Appl 14(2) (2009), 119–130.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  69. S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Slowinski, Rough sets theory for multi criteria decision analysis, Eur J Oper Res 129 (2001), 1–47.

  70. S. Opricovic and G.H. Tzeng, Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, Eur J Oper Res 156 (2004), 445–455.

  71. S.H. Kim S.H. Choi, and J.K. Kim, An interactive procedure for multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete information: Range‐based approach, Eur J Oper Res 118 (1999), 139–152.

  72. S.P. Shepherd, P.M. Timms, and A.D. May, Modeling requirements for local transport plans in the UK, Transport Policy 13 (2006), 307–317.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. T.L. Saaty, Decision making with dependence and feedback: Analytic network process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. T.L. Saaty, Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, Int J Serv Sci 1(1) (2008), 83–98.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. T.L. Saaty, Fundamentals of the analytic network process: Dependence and feedback in decision‐making with a single network, J Syst Sci Syst Eng 13(2) (2004), 129–157.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  76. T.L. Saaty, The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw‐Hill International, New York, 1980.

  77. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Many analyses of alternatives have not provided a robust assessment of weapon system options, Publication GAO‐09‐665, GAO, Washington, DC, 2009, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO‐09‐665, retrieved October 10, 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. V.P. Agrawal, V. Kohli, and S. Gupta, Computer aided robot selection: The multiple attribute decision making approach, Int J Prod Res, 29, (8) (1991), 1629–1644.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. V.V. Vladimirovich, Randomization aggregate indices method and its continuous modification, Social Science Research Network, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 2010, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1649571, retrieved October 8, 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. W. Kotowski, K. Dembczynski, S. Greco, and R. Sowinski, Stochastic dominance‐based rough set model for ordinal classification, 2008, http://www.cs.put.poznan.pl/wkotlowski/research/stochastic‐drsa‐report.pdf, retrieved November 26, 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. W.K. Brauers and E.K. Zavadskas, The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy, Control Cybernet 35(2) (2006), 443–468.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  82. X. Xu, The SIR method: A superiority and inferiority ranking method for multiple criteria decision making, Eur J Oper Res 131(3) (2001), 587–602.

  83. Y.P Yang, H.M. Shieh, J.D. Leu, and G.H. Tzeng, A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications, Int J Oper Res 5(3) (2008), 160–168.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Paris climate agreement and global environmental efficiency: New evidence from fuzzy regression discontinuity design. (2022). Salman, Muhammad ; Long, Xingle ; Wang, Guimei ; Zha, Donglan.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:168:y:2022:i:c:s0301421522003536.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Performance Evaluation of Thermal Power Generation: Non-Parametric Frontier Approach. (2016). Fatima, Sahba .
    In: Bulletin of Energy Economics (BEE).
    RePEc:ijr:beejor:v:4:y:2016:i:1:p:81-92.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Una comparación internacional de la eficiencia de sistemas educativos. Un enfoque dinámico para el periodo 2003-2012.. (2016). Garcia, Victor Gimenez ; Tortosa-Ausina, Emili ; Jimenez, Diego Prior ; Thieme, Claudio.
    In: Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación volume 11.
    RePEc:aec:ieed11:11-36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. ¿Son eficientes en docencia, investigación y transferencia de conocimiento las universidades públicas españolas? Medida y determinantes. (2016). Fernandez-Santos, Yolanda ; Fernandez-Fernandez, Jose Miguel ; Martinez-Campillo, Almudena.
    In: Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación volume 11.
    RePEc:aec:ieed11:11-35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Statistical evaluation of Data Envelopment Analysis versus COLS Cobb–Douglas benchmarking models for the 2011 Brazilian tariff revision. (2015). Costa, Marcelo Azevedo ; Lopes, Ana Lucia Miranda, ; de Pinho Matos, Giordano Bruno Braz, .
    In: Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:soceps:v:49:y:2015:i:c:p:47-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Evaluation of operation and control in HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning) system using exergy analysis method. (2015). Du, Zhimin ; Jin, Xinqiao ; Fan, BO.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:89:y:2015:i:c:p:372-381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Energy Efficiency in Electricity Production: A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach for the G-20 Countries. (2015). Tugcu, Can ; Dogan, Nuri Ozgur.
    In: International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:eco:journ2:2015-01-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Determination of Efficiency of Fish Farms in North-East India Using Data Envelopment Approach. (2015). Satyasai, K.J.S. ; Ananthan, P S ; Sivaramane, N ; Singh, N D ; Krishnan, M.
    In: Agricultural Economics Research Review.
    RePEc:ags:aerrae:229751.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The innovation efficiency of German regions - a shared-input DEA approach. (2013). Broekel, Tom ; Brenner, Thomas ; Rogge, Nicky.
    In: Working Papers on Innovation and Space.
    RePEc:pum:wpaper:2013-08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Eficiencia de las sociedades musicales de la Comunidad Valenciana || Efficiency of Musical Societies in the Valencian Community. (2013). Köster, Pau ; Marco-Serrano, Francisco ; Coll-Serrano, Vicente ; Sanchis, Raul Abeledo ; Koster, Pau Rausell.
    In: Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration.
    RePEc:pab:rmcpee:v:15:y:2013:i:1:p:117-132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Sustainability matters. (2013). DiMaria, Charles-Henri.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00827315.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. What is the best practice for benchmark regulation of electricity distribution? Comparison of DEA, SFA and StoNED methods. (2013). Kuosmanen, Timo ; Sipilainen, Timo ; Saastamoinen, Antti.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:61:y:2013:i:c:p:740-750.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Unobserved heterogeneous effects in the cost efficiency analysis of electricity distribution systems. (2013). Koller, Martin ; Filippini, Massimo ; Farsi, Mehdi ; Agrell, Per.
    In: LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE.
    RePEc:cor:louvco:2013003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Development of Total Factor Productivity in Alpine Farming - A Malmquist index approach -. (2013). Kirchweger, S. ; Kapfer, M. ; Franzel, M. ; Kantelhardt, J..
    In: 2013 Second Congress, June 6-7, 2013, Parma, Italy.
    RePEc:ags:aiea13:149897.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. A Within-Farm Efficiency Comparison of Silvopasture Systems with Conventional Pasture and Forestry in Northeast Argentina. (2012). Renkow, Mitch ; Colcombet, Luis ; Fassola, Hugo E. ; Frey, Gregory E. ; Cubbage, Frederick W. ; Lacorte, Santiago M. ; Perez, Oscar ; Pachas, Nahuel A..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:88:y:2012:iv:1:p:639-657.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Efficiency, productivity and technology comparison for farms in Central and Western Europe: The case of field crop and dairy farming in Hungary and France. (2012). Latruffe, Laure ; Fogarasi, József ; Desjeux, Yann.
    In: Economic Systems.
    RePEc:eee:ecosys:v:36:y:2012:i:2:p:264-278.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Assessing the Efficiency of Mother-to-Child HIV Prevention in Low- and Middle-Income Countries using Data Envelopment Analysis. (2012). Santos, Sérgio ; Carla A. E. Amado, .
    In: CEFAGE-UE Working Papers.
    RePEc:cfe:wpcefa:2012_02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Regional environmental efficiency and economic growth: NUTS2 evidence from Germany, France and the UK. (2011). Tzeremes, Nickolaos ; HALKOS, GEORGE.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:33698.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. DEA数据标准化方法及其在方向距离函数模型中的应用. (2011). Qian, Zhenhua ; Cheng, Gang.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:31995.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Overcoming the infeasibility of super-efficiency DEA model: a model with generalized orientation. (2011). Zervopoulos, Panagiotis ; Qian, Zhenhua ; Cheng, Gang.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:31991.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Size and specialization as determinant of iberian port performance: new methodology to group different ports. (2011). Caldeirinha, Vitor.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:31957.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. The use of supply chain DEA models in operations management: A survey. (2011). Tzeremes, Nickolaos ; Kourtzidis, Stavros ; HALKOS, GEORGE.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:31846.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Environment-adjusted regional energy efficiency in Taiwan. (2011). Hu, Jin-Li ; Lio, Mon-Chi ; Yeh, Fang-Yu ; Lin, Cheng-Hsun .
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:88:y:2011:i:8:p:2893-2899.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Review of building energy-use performance benchmarking methodologies. (2011). Chung, William.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:88:y:2011:i:5:p:1470-1479.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Optimization of energy consumption for soybean production using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach. (2011). Rafiee, Shahin ; Mousavi-Avval, Seyed Hashem ; Mohammadi, Ali ; Jafari, Ali.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:88:y:2011:i:11:p:3765-3772.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Water Valuation in Agriculture under climate change (Case of Souss-Massa Basin, Morocco). (2011). Diukkali, Rachid ; Elame, Fouad.
    In: 2011 Conference: Impacts of Climate Change on Agriculture, December 6-7, 2011, Rabat, Morocco.
    RePEc:ags:morc11:188553.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Efficiency of the Portuguese metros. is it different from other European metros?. (2010). Marques, RC ; Simes, Pedro ; Costa, lvaro ; Santos, Joana.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:34904.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Quantitative studies of water and sanitation utilities: a literature survey. (2010). Marques, RC ; Berg, Sanford.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:32891.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Estimation of trade and domestic distortions: an application to world agriculture. (2010). Reimer, Jeffrey ; Kang, Sang .
    In: Journal of Productivity Analysis.
    RePEc:kap:jproda:v:34:y:2010:i:3:p:257-265.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Cross redundancy and sensitivity in DEA models. (2010). Choi, Kyuwan ; Lee, Kyuseok.
    In: Journal of Productivity Analysis.
    RePEc:kap:jproda:v:34:y:2010:i:2:p:151-165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Income distribution determinants and public spending efficiency. (2010). Schuknecht, Ludger ; Afonso, Antonio ; Tanzi, Vito.
    In: The Journal of Economic Inequality.
    RePEc:kap:jecinq:v:8:y:2010:i:3:p:367-389.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Business Reputation and Labor Efficiency, Productivity, and Cost. (2010). Stuebs, Marty ; Sun, LI.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:96:y:2010:i:2:p:265-283.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Occupations at risk: The task content and job stability. (2010). Söllner, René ; Krüger, Jens ; Cantner, Uwe ; Sollner, Rene ; Kruger, Jens J..
    In: Jena Economics Research Papers.
    RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2010-024.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Exploring the operating efficiency of semiconductor industry by a sustainable development approach. (2010). Hung, Shiu-Wan ; Liu, Mei-Chun .
    In: International Journal of Green Economics.
    RePEc:ids:ijgrec:v:4:y:2010:i:2:p:145-155.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Exploring the effect of countries’ economic prosperity on their biodiversity performance. (2009). Tzeremes, Nickolaos ; HALKOS, GEORGE.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:32102.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Health Care Services Performance Measurement: Theory, Methods and Empirical Evidence. (2009). Yfantopoulos, John ; Prezerakos, P. ; Maniadakis, N. ; Kotsopoulos, N..
    In: European Research Studies Journal.
    RePEc:ers:journl:v:xii:y:2009:i:3:p:151-170.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Mexico: total productivity changes at the principal container ports. (2009). Rivera, Cesar ; Guerrero, Alejandro .
    In: Revista CEPAL.
    RePEc:ecr:col070:11372.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. EFEKTYWNOŚĆ TECHNICZNA I EFEKTYWNOŚĆ SKALI GOSPODARSTW WIELKOTOWAROWYCH W LATACH 2005–2007 – POMIAR METODĄ NIEPARAMETRYCZNĄ. (2009). Ziokowska, Justyna .
    In: Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo).
    RePEc:ags:polvaa:230941.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Technical Efficiency and its Determinants in Tomato Production in Karnataka, India: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach. (2009). Dakshinamoorthy, V. ; Murthy, Sreenivasa D. ; Sudha, M. ; Hegde, M. R..
    In: Agricultural Economics Research Review.
    RePEc:ags:aerrae:57399.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Efficiency Estimates for the Agricultural Production in Vietnam: A Comparison of Parametric and Non-parametric Approaches. (2009). Giang, Long ; Nguyen, Khac Minh.
    In: Agricultural Economics Review.
    RePEc:ags:aergaa:58060.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Merger and optimal number of firms: an integrated simulation approach. (2008). Lin, Lin ; Kuo, Hsien-Chang.
    In: Applied Economics.
    RePEc:taf:applec:v:40:y:2008:i:18:p:2413-2421.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Relative Efficiency in the branch network of a Greek bank: A quantitative analysis. (2008). Donatos, G. S. ; Giokas, D. I..
    In: European Research Studies Journal.
    RePEc:ers:journl:v:xi:y:2008:i:3:p:53-72.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Analysing The Efficiency Of The Greek Life Insurance Industry. (2008). NEKTARIOS, MILTON ; Borges, Maria.
    In: European Research Studies Journal.
    RePEc:ers:journl:v:xi:y:2008:i:3:p:35-52.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Productivity and Efficiency of US Gas Transmission Companies: A European Regulatory Perspective. (2008). Triebs, Thomas ; Pollitt, Michael ; Jamasb, Tooraj.
    In: Cambridge Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cam:camdae:0812.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Mean and Bold?. (2007). Dijkgraaf, Elbert ; De Witte, Kristof.
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20070092.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Examining the relationship between firm internationalization and firm performance: A nonparametric analysis. (2007). Tzeremes, Nickolaos ; HALKOS, GEORGE.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:32082.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Assessment of Tourist Competitiveness by analysing Destination Efficiency. (2006). Nijkamp, Peter ; Rietveld, Piet ; Cracolici, Francesca .
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20060097.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Performance and efficiency in Colombias power utilities: an assessment of the 1994 reform. (2004). Taborda, Rodrigo ; Pombo, Carlos.
    In: Borradores de Investigación.
    RePEc:col:000091:003322.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Électricité en Afrique et performance productive. (2001). Plane, Patrick ; Hofman, Lucile .
    In: L'Actualité Economique.
    RePEc:ris:actuec:v:77:y:2001:i:3:p:385-408.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Fractional programming: a tool for the assessment of sustainability. (1999). Lara, P. ; Stancu-Minasian, I..
    In: Agricultural Systems.
    RePEc:eee:agisys:v:62:y:1999:i:2:p:131-141.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-02 21:20:21 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.