This document has not been cited yet.

1. (1998). Nonpoint Pollution of Surface Waters with Phosphorus and Nitrogen. Ecological Applications, 8(3), 559. https://doi.org/10.2307/2641247 Cason, T. N., & Gangadharan, L. (2004). Auction design for voluntary conservation programs.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

2. Arnold, M. A., Duke, J. M., & Messer, K. D. (2013). Adverse selection in reverse auctions for ecosystem services. Land Economics, 89(3), 387–412.

3. Canton, J., De Cara, S., & Jayet, P.-A. (2009). Agri-environmental schemes: Adverse selection, information structure and delegation. Ecological Economics, 68(7), 2114–2121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.007 Carpenter, S. R., Caraco, N. F., Correll, D. L., Howarth, R. W., Sharpley, A. N., & Smith, V. H.

4. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(3), 1316–1325. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2020499 Smith, R. B. (1995). The conservation reserve program as a least-cost land retirement mechanism. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(1), 93–105.

5. Ferraro, P. J. (2008). Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 65(4), 810–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.029 Horowitz, J. K., Lynch, L., & Stocking, A. (2009). Competition-based environmental policy: an analysis of farmland preservation in Maryland. Land Economics, 85(4), 555–575.

6. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015200 Wu, J., & Babcock, B. A. (1996). Contract design for the purchase of environmental goods from agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78(4), 935–945.

7. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR001096 Kaplan, J. D., Howitt, R. E., & Farzin, Y. H. (2003). An information-theoretical analysis of budgetconstrained nonpoint source pollution control. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(1), 106–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00035-9 Kirwan, B., Lubowski, R. N., & Roberts, M. J. (2005). How cost-effective are land retirement auctions? Estimating the difference between payments and willingness to accept in the Conservation Reserve Program. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(5), 1239–1247.

8. Johansson, R. C., & Randall, J. (2003). Watershed abatement costs for agricultural phosphorus: WATERSHED ABATEMENT. Water Resources Research, 39(4).
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

9. Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J. (1993). A theory of incentives in procurement and regulation. MIT press.

10. Messer, K. D., & Allen III, W. L. (2010). Applying optimization and the analytic hierarchy process to enhance agricultural preservation strategies in the state of Delaware. Agricultural & Resource Economics Review, 39(3), 442.

11. Schilizzi, S., & Latacz-Lohmann, U. (2007). Assessing the performance of conservation auctions: an experimental study. Land Economics, 83(4), 497–515.

12. Shortle, J. S., & Horan, R. D. (2001). The economics of nonpoint pollution control. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(3), 255–289.

13. Shortle, J. S., Ribaudo, M., Horan, R. D., & Blandford, D. (2012). Reforming Agricultural Nonpoint Pollution Policy in an Increasingly Budget-Constrained Environment.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

14. Shortle, J., & Horan, R. D. (2013). Policy Instruments for Water Quality Protection. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 5(1), 111–138. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource091912 -151903 Shortle, J. S., Abler, D. G., & Horan, R. D. (1998). Research issues in nonpoint pollution control. Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3), 571–585.

15. Wilson, R. S., Howard, G., & Burnett, E. A. (2014). Improving nutrient management practices in agriculture: The role of risk-based beliefs in understanding farmers’ attitudes toward taking additional action. Water Resources Research, 50(8), 6735–6746.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

16. Young, C. E., & Shortle, J. S. (1984). Investments in soil conservation structures: The role of operator and operation characteristics. Agricultural Economics Research, 36(2), 10–15.

1. Evaluating the tradeoff between cost effectiveness and participation in agricultural conservation programs. (2024). Howard, Gregory ; Zhang, Wendong ; Gassman, Philip W ; Valculisman, Adriana.
   In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
   RePEc:wly:ajagec:v:106:y:2024:i:2:p:712-738.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Addressing coordination problems in residential buyouts: Experimental evidence for managed retreat in the face of climate change-related threats. (2024). Dineva, Polina K ; Palm-Forster, Leah H ; Paul, Laura A ; Messer, Kent D ; McGranaghan, Christina ; Siders, A R.
   In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
   RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:226:y:2024:i:c:s0167268124002622.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Rent seeking and precautionary bidding in conservation auctions. (2024). Wichmann, Bruno.
   In: Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie.
   RePEc:bla:canjag:v:72:y:2024:i:3:p:235-249.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Optimizing contract allocation for risky conservation tenders. (2023). Iftekhar, Md Sayed ; Olita, Harriet Toto.
   In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
   RePEc:spr:envpol:v:25:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10018-022-00341-1.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Informational nudges in conservation auctions: A field experiment with U.S. farmers. (2023). Ferraro, Paul ; Wallander, Steven ; Iovanna, Richard ; Paul, Laura A ; Messer, Kent D.
   In: Food Policy.
   RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:120:y:2023:i:c:s0306919223001021.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Evaluating the Efficiency-Participation Tradeoff in Agricultural Conservation Programs: The Effect of Reverse Auctions, Spatial Targeting, and Higher Offered Payments. (2022). Zhang, Wendong ; Howard, Gregory ; Gassman, Philip ; Valcu-Lisman, Adriana.
   In: Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications.
   RePEc:ias:cpaper:21-wp622.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Mapping urban ecosystem services to design cost-effective purchase of development rights programs: The case of the Greater Paris metropolis. (2022). Levrel, Harold ; Mikou, Mehdi ; Tardieu, Lea ; Claron, Charles.
   In: Land Use Policy.
   RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:122:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722003763.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Barriers to Using Economic Experiments in Evidence‐Based Agricultural Policymaking. (2021). Rosch, Stephanie ; Messer, Kent ; Hellerstein, Daniel ; Skorbiansky, Sharon Raszap ; Weigel, Collin.
   In: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy.
   RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:43:y:2021:i:2:p:531-555.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Balancing Cost Effectiveness and Incentive Properties in Conservation Auctions: Experimental Evidence from Three Multi-award Reverse Auction Mechanisms. (2021). Liu, Pengfei.
   In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
   RePEc:kap:enreec:v:78:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10640-021-00538-0.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Evaluating the Efficiency-Participation Tradeoff in Agricultural Conservation Programs: The Effect of Reverse Auctions, Spatial Targeting, and Higher Offered Payments. (2021). Zhang, Wendong ; Howard, Gregory ; Valcu-Lisman, Adriana M.
    In: 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas.
    RePEc:ags:aaea21:313926.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Behavioral and Experimental Agri-Environmental Research: Methodological Challenges, Literature Gaps, and Recommendations. (2019). Vossler, Christian ; Messer, Kent ; Ferraro, Paul ; Janusch, Nicholas ; Palm-Forster, Leah H.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:73:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10640-019-00342-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. The Random Quantity Mechanism: Laboratory and Field Tests of a Novel Cost-Revealing Procurement Mechanism. (2019). Bell, Samuel D ; Streletskaya, Nadia A.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:73:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10640-019-00335-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Private Benefits of Conservation and Procurement Auction Performance. (2019). Conte, Marc ; Griffin, Robert.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:73:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10640-019-00333-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Pay for the Option to Pay? The Impact of Improved Scientific Information on Payments for Ecosystem Services. (2019). Sayre, Susan.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:73:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-018-0275-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. A Cautionary Note on the Use of Benefit Metrics for Cost-Effective Conservation. (2018). Messer, Kent ; Kecinski, Maik ; Fooks, Jacob R.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:71:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10640-017-0192-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. An auction mechanism for the optimal provision of ecosystem services under climate change. (2018). Polasky, Stephen ; Lewis, David.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:92:y:2018:i:c:p:20-34.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Context Matters: Exploring the Cost-effectiveness of Fixed Payments and Procurement Auctions for PES. (2018). Alpizar Rodriguez, Francisco ; Persson, Martin U ; Lundberg, Liv ; Lindgren, Kristian.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:146:y:2018:i:c:p:347-358.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Quality Information and Procurement Auction Outcomes: Evidence from a Payment for Ecosystem Services Laboratory Experiment. (2017). Griffin, Robert M ; Conte, Marc N.
    In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:wly:ajagec:v:99:y:2017:i:3:p:571-591.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Auctioning Risky Conservation Contracts. (2017). Wichmann, Bruno ; Boxall, Peter ; Wilson, Scott ; Pergery, Orsolya.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:68:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10640-016-0063-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. The US Conservation Reserve Program: The evolution of an enrollment mechanism. (2017). Hellerstein, Daniel.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:63:y:2017:i:c:p:601-610.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Designing and implementing conservation tender metrics: Twelve core considerations. (2017). Whitten, Stuart.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:63:y:2017:i:c:p:561-571.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. When Does Public Information Undermine the Efficiency of Reverse Auctions for the Purchase of Ecosystem Services?. (2017). Messer, Kent ; Lynch, Lori ; Li, Tongzhe ; Duke, Joshua.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:134:y:2017:i:c:p:212-226.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Balancing Complexity and Rent-Seeking in Multi-Attribute Conservation Procurement Auctions: Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment. (2017). Conte, Marc ; Banerjee, Simanti.
    In: 2018 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting, January 5-7, 2018, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
    RePEc:ags:assa18:266293.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Farmer participation in nutrient management practices in Delaware: A field experiment. (2017). Messer, Kent ; Ferraro, Paul ; Allen, William ; Janusch, Nicholas R.
    In: 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois.
    RePEc:ags:aaea17:258456.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Incentive-Based Policy Design for Pollution Control and Biodiversity Conservation: A Review. (2016). Hanley, Nick ; de Vries, Frans.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:63:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s10640-015-9996-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Undermined by adverse selection: Australia’s Direct Action abatement subsidies. (2016). Burke, Paul.
    In: CCEP Working Papers.
    RePEc:een:ccepwp:1605.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Undermined by Adverse Selection: Australias Direct Action Abatement Subsidies. (2016). Burke, Paul.
    In: Economic Papers.
    RePEc:bla:econpa:v:35:y:2016:i:3:p:216-229.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Undermined by adverse selection: Australia’s Direct Action abatement subsidies. (2016). Burke, Paul.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:ancewp:249524.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Dynamic Entry, Reverse Auctions, and the Purchase of Environmental Services. (2015). Messer, Kent ; Duke, Joshua ; Fooks, Jacob R..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:91:y:2015:i:1:p:57-75.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Incentive-Based Policy Design for Pollution Control and Biodiversity Conservation:A Review. (2015). Hanley, Nick ; de Vries, Frans.
    In: Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics.
    RePEc:sss:wpaper:2015-21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Environmental Risk Negatively Impacts Trust and Reciprocity in Conservation Contracts: Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment. (2015). Vogt, Nora .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:62:y:2015:i:3:p:417-431.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Information and Auction Performance: A Laboratory Study of Conservation Auctions for Spatially Contiguous Land Management. (2015). Shortle, James ; Banerjee, Simanti ; Kwasnica, Anthony.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:61:y:2015:i:3:p:409-431.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Too Burdensome to Bid: Transaction Costs and Pay-for-Performance Conservation. (2015). Swinton, Scott ; Shupp, Robert ; Lupi, Frank ; Palm-Forster, Leah H.
    In: 2016 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting, January 3-5, 2016, San Francisco, California.
    RePEc:ags:assa16:212816.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Lock-in effects in competitive bidding schemes for payments for ecosystem services: Revisiting the fundamental transformation. (2013). Vogt, Nora ; Bizer, Kilian.
    In: University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:zbw:cegedp:158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Demand-side Value for Ecosystem Services and Implications for Innovative Markets: Experimental Perspectives on the Possibility of Private Markets for Public Goods. (2013). Swallow, Stephen.
    In: Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.
    RePEc:ags:arerjl:148396.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-27 15:34:09 || Missing content? Let us know