This document has not been cited yet.

1. Adamowicz, W., P. Boxall, M. Williams, and J. Louviere. 1998. “Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80:64–75.

2. Anh, N.H., Bokelmann, W. 2019. “Determinants of smallholders’ market preferences: the case of sustainable certified coffee farmers in Vietnam”. Sustainability, 11(10): 2897.

3. Arinloye, D.-D.A.A.; Pascucci, S.; Linnemann, A.R.; Coulibaly, O.N.; Hagelaar, G.; Omta, O.S.W.F. 2015. Marketing Channel Selection by Smallholder Farmers. J. Food Prod. Mark. 21: 337–357.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Asfaw, S., D. Mithöfer, and H. Waibel. 2010. “Agrifood supply chain, private-sector standards, and farmers’ health: evidence from Kenya.” Agricultural Economics 41:251–263.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

5. Barrett, C.B. 2008. “Smallholder market participation: Concepts and evidence from eastern and southern Africa.” Food Policy 33: 299–317.

6. Blackman, A., and J. Rivera. 2010. “The Evidence Base for Environmental and Socioeconomic Impacts of Sustainable Certification.” Available at SSRN 1579083.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

7. Blackman, A., and M.A. Naranjo. 2012. “Does eco-certification have environmental benefits? Organic coffee in Costa Rica.” Ecological Economics 83:58 – 66.

8. Borrella, I., C. Mataix, and R. Carrasco-Gallego. 2015. “Smallholder Farmers in the Speciality Coffee Industry: Opportunities, Constraints and the Businesses that are Making it Possible.” IDS Bulletin 46:29–44.

9. Bougherara, D., and P. Combris. 2009. “Eco-labelled food products: what are consumers paying for?” European Review of Agricultural Economics 36:321–341.

10. Bro, A., & Clay, D. C. 2017. Transforming Burundi’s coffee sector through strategic value chain investments. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 7(3): 218-230.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Broch, S.W., and S.E. Vedel. 2012. “Using Choice Experiments to Investigate the Policy Relevance of Heterogeneity in Farmer Agri-Environmental Contract Preferences.” Environmental and Resource Economics 51:561–581.

12. Broch, S.W., N. Strange, J.B. Jacobsen, and K.A. Wilson. 2013. “Farmers’ willingness to provide ecosystem services and effects of their spatial distribution.” Ecological Economics 92:78 – 86.

13. Burton, M., D. Rigby, and T. Young. 2003. “Modelling the adoption of organic horticultural technology in the UK using Duration Analysis.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 47:29–54.

14. Espinosa-Goded, M., J. Barreiro-Hurle, and E. Ruto. 2010. “What Do Farmers Want From Agri-Environmental Scheme Design? A Choice Experiment Approach.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 61:259–273.

15. Fitter, R., and R. Kaplinksy. 2001. “Who Gains from Product Rents as the Coffee Market Becomes More Differentiated? A Value-chain Analysis.” IDS Bulletin 32:69–82.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Flaten, O., G. Lien, M. Ebbesvik, M. Koesling, and P.S. Valle. 2006. “Do the new organic producers differ from the old guard? Empirical results from Norwegian dairy farming.” Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 21:174–182.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Gevrek, Z., and A. Uyduranoglu. 2015. “Public preferences for carbon tax attributes.” Ecological Economics 118:186 – 197.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Giovannucci, D., and S. Ponte. 2005. “Standards as a new form of social contract? Sustainability initiatives in the coffee industry.” Food Policy 30:284 – 301.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

19. Greiner, R. 2016. “Factors influencing farmers’ participation in contractual biodiversity conservation: a choice experiment with northern Australian pastoralists.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 60:1–21.

20. Henson, S., O. Masakure, and J. Cranfield. 2011. “Do Fresh Produce Exporters in Sub- Saharan Africa Benefit from GlobalGAP Certification?” World Development 39:375 – 386.

21. Hess, S., Lind, L. W., & Liang, S. 2013. “Farmers’ perceived transaction costs in relation to slaughterhouses of different ownership structure”. Agribusiness, 29(1), 96-111. Page 22 of 26 Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies o f A g r i b u s i n e s s i n D e v e l o p i n g a n d E m e r g i n g E c o n o

22. Hole, A.R. 2007. “Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood.” The Stata Journal 7:388–401.

23. iv For example, the annual growth rate of coffee sold under the Rainforest Alliance (resp. UTZ) certification reached 28 % (resp. 25 %) in 2012 (Potts et al., 2014).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Jabbour, C. J. C., & Renwick, D. W. S. 2018. The soft side of environmentally-sustainable organizations. RAUSP Management Journal, 53(4): 622-627.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. Jha, S., Bacon, C. M., Philpott, S. M., Rice, R. A., Méndez, V. E., & Läderach, P. 2011. A review of ecosystem services, farmer livelihoods, and value chains in shade coffee agroecosystems. In Integrating agriculture, conservation and ecotourism: examples from the field. Springer, Dordrecht (pp. 141-208).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Krishna, V.V., A.G. Drucker, U. Pascual, P.T. Raghu, and E.I.O. King. 2013. “Estimating compensation payments for on-farm conservation of agricultural biodiversity in developing countries.” Ecological Economics 87:110–123.

27. Kumar, A., Roy, D., Tripathi, G., Joshi, P. K., & Adhikari, R. P. 2018. “Does contract farming improve profits and food safety? Evidence from tomato cultivation in Nepal”. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 8(3): 603-624.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

28. Lapple, D. 2010. “Adoption and Abandonment of Organic Farming: An Empirical Investigation of the Irish Drystock Sector.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 61:697–714.

29. Lapple, D., and H. Kelley. 2013. “Understanding the uptake of organic farming: Accounting for heterogeneities among Irish farmers.” Ecological Economics 88:11 – 19.

30. Lienhoop, N., and R. Brouwer. 2015. “Agri-environmental policy valuation: Farmers’ contract design preferences for afforestation schemes.” Land Use Policy 42:568 – 577.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

31. Louviere, J.J., and D.A. Hensher. 1983. “Using Discrete Choice Models with Experimental Design Data to Forecast Consumer Demand for a Unique Cultural Event.” Journal of Consumer Research 10:348–361.

32. Louviere, J.J., and G. Woodworth. 1983. “Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data.” Journal of Marketing Research 20:350–367.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

33. Maertens, M., and J.F. Swinnen. 2009. “Trade, Standards, and Poverty: Evidence from Senegal.” World Development 37:161 – 178.

34. Martino, G., & Polinori, P. (2019). An analysis of the farmers contractual preferences in process innovation implementation: A case study in the Italian poultry context. British Food Journal, 121(2): 426-440.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. McFadden, D. 1974. Frontiers in Econometrics, New York: Academic Press, chap. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. pp. 105–142.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

36. Minten, B., L. Randrianarison, and J.F. Swinnen. 2009. “Global Retail Chains and Poor Farmers: Evidence from Madagascar.” World Development 37:1728 – 1741.

37. Mulatu, D.W., A. van der Veen, and P.R. van Oel. 2014. “Farm households’ preferences for collective and individual actions to improve water-related ecosystem services: The Lake Naivasha basin, Kenya.” Ecosystem Services 7:22 – 33.

38. Muradian, R., E. Corbera, U. Pascual, N. Kosoy, and P.H. May. 2010. “Reconciling theory and Page 23 of 26 Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies o f A g r i b u s i n e s s i n D e v e l o p i n g a n d E m e r g i n g E c o n o
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
39. Oliveira, G.M., Zylberstajn, D. and Saes, M.S.M. 2019. “Can contracts substitute hierarchy? Evidence from high-quality coffee supply in Brazil”. British Food Journal, 121 (3): 787802.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. Panhuysen, S. and Pierrot, J. 2018. “Coffee Barometer 2018”.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

41. Pietola, K., and A. Lansink. 2001. “Farmer response to policies promoting organic farming technologies in Finland.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 28:1–15.

42. Pirard, R., and R. Lapeyre. 2014. “Classifying market-based instruments for ecosystem services: A guide to the literature jungle.” Ecosystem Services, (9):106-114.

43. Potts, J., J. van der Meer, and J. Daitchman. 2010. “The State of Sustainability Initiatives Review 2010: Sustainability and Transparency.” Working paper, IISD, IIED, Aidenvironment, UNCTAD and ENTWINED.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

44. Rehman, T., K. McKemey, C. Yates, R. Cooke, C. Garforth, R. Tranter, J. Park, and P. Dorward. 2007. “Identifying and understanding factors influencing the uptake of new technologies on dairy farms in SW England using the theory of reasoned action.” Agricultural Systems 94:281 – 293.

45. Reinecke, J., S. Manning, and O. von Hagen. 2012. “The Emergence of a Standards Market: Multiplicity of Sustainability Standards in the Global Coffee Industry.” Organization Studies 33:789–812.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

46. Revelt, D., and K. Train. 2001. “Customer-Specific Taste Parameters and Mixed Logit: Households ’ Choice of Electricity Supplier.” Econometrics No. 0012001, EconWPA, Jan.—. 1998. “Mixed Logit With Repeated Choices: Households’ Choices Of Appliance Efficiency Level.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 80:647–657.

47. Ruto, E., and G. Garrod. 2009. “Investigating farmers’ preferences for the design of agrienvironment schemes: a choice experiment approach.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52:631–647.

48. Sales, E.F., V.E. Mendez, F.R. Caporal, and J.C. Faria. 2013. “Agroecological Transition of Conilon Coffee (Coffea canephora) Agroforestry Systems in the State of Espirito Santo, Brazil.” Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37:405–429.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

49. Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., & Todd, P. M. (2010). Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. Journal of consumer research, 37(3), 409-425.

50. Schmidtner, E., C. Lippert, B. Engler, A.M. Häring, J. Aurbacher, and S. Dabbert. 2012. “Spatial distribution of organic farming in Germany: does neighbourhood matter?” European Review of Agricultural Economics 39:661–683.

51. Schulz, N., G. Breustedt, and U. Latacz-Lohmann. 2014. “Assessing Farmers’ Willingness to Accept Greening: Insights from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Germany.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 65:26–48.

52. Sillano, M., and J. de Dios Ortúzar. 2005. “Willingness-to-pay estimation with mixed logit models: some new evidence.” Environment and Planning A 37:525–550.

53. Stranieri, S., Cavaliere, A., & Banterle, A. (2017). Do motivations affect different voluntary traceability schemes? An empirical analysis among food manufacturers. Food control, 80, 187-196.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

54. Subervie, J., and I. Vagneron. 2013. “A Drop of Water in the Indian Ocean? The Impact of GlobalGap Certification on Lychee Farmers in Madagascar.” World Development 50:57– 73.

55. Train, K.E. 1998. “Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences over People.” Land Economics 74:230–239.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
56. Villanueva, A., J. Gomez-Limon, M. Arriaza, and M. Rodriguez-Entrena. 2015. “The design of agri-environmental schemes: Farmers’ preferences in southern Spain.” Land Use Policy 46:142 – 154.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
57. Vorley, B., and T. Fox. 2004. “Global Food Chains: Constraints and Opportunities for Smallholders. ” Working paper, OECD.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
58. Watanabe, K., Bánkuti, S.S. and Lourenzani, A. E. 2017. “Pingado Dilemma”: is formal contract sweet enough? Journal of Rural Studies, 54, p.126-137.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
59. Wehrmeyer, W., and Y. Mulugetta. 1999. Growing Pains: Environmental Management in Developing Countries. Greenleaf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
60. Wieck, C., and D.N. Annen. 2012. “Understanding farmers’ participation in and compliance with public and private standards.” Food Economics 9:199–214.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
61. Williamson, O.E., (1985). Hierarchies, market and power in the economy: an economic perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
62. xiii Intuitively this can be thought of as the conditional mean of the distribution of these coefficients for the subgroup of individuals who face the same alternatives and make the same choices (Hole, 2007). xiv Formally, we run the Shapiro-Wilk test and the Shapiro-Francia test. Both tests indicate that we cannot reject the null of normality in the case of the “no pesticides” variable and the “price premium” attributes. Page 26 of 26 Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Demand response to improved walking infrastructure: A study into the economics of walking and health behaviour change. (2015). Hunter, Ruth F ; Tully, Mark A ; Hutchinson, George W ; Kee, Frank ; Longo, Alberto.
   In: Social Science & Medicine.
   RePEc:eee:socmed:v:143:y:2015:i:c:p:107-116.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Valuing type and scope of ecosystem conservation: A meta-analysis. (2015). HUSSAIN, Anwar ; Phillips, Spencer ; Hjerpe, Evan.
   In: Journal of Forest Economics.
   RePEc:eee:foreco:v:21:y:2015:i:1:p:32-50.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Valuing Grassland Restoration: Proximity to Substitutes and Trade-offs among Conservation Attributes. (2014). Dissanayake, Sahan ; Ando, Amy ; Sahan T. M. Dissanayake, .
   In: Land Economics.
   RePEc:uwp:landec:v:90:y:2014:ii:1:p:237-259.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. The influence of individuals in forming collective household preferences for water quality. (2014). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Thiene, Mara ; Rungie, Cam.
   In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
   RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:68:y:2014:i:1:p:161-174.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. The Effects of Intertemporal Considerations on Consumer Preferences for Biofuels. (2013). Khachatryan, Hayk ; casavant, ken ; Joireman, Jeff.
   In: 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C..
   RePEc:ags:aaea13:150334.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. How Can Behavioral Economics Inform Nonmarket Valuation? An Example from the Preference Reversal Literature. (2011). List, John ; Alevy, Jonathan ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
   In: Land Economics.
   RePEc:uwp:landec:v:87:y:2011:iii:1:p:365-381.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. The Equity-Efficiency Trade-off in Environmental Policy: Evidence from Stated Preferences. (2010). Atkinson, Giles ; Dietz, Simon.
   In: Land Economics.
   RePEc:uwp:landec:v:86:y:2010:iii:1:p423-443.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Preferences for long-term care services: Willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment. (2010). Koolman, Xander ; Stolk, Elly A. ; Nieboer, Anna P..
   In: Social Science & Medicine.
   RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:9:p:1317-1325.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Identifying Consumer Preferences for Nutrition Information on Grocery Store Shelf Labels. (2009). McCluskey, Jill ; Chouinard, Hayley ; Berning, Joshua ; Manning, Kenneth ; Sprott, David.
   In: Research Reports.
   RePEc:ags:uconnr:149962.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Sequencing Anomalies in Choice Experiments. (2008). pinto-prades, jose-luis ; Pintoprades, Jose Luis ; Day, Brett.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pab:wpaper:08.10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Introducing a genetically modified banana in Uganda: Social benefits, costs, and consumer perceptions. (2008). Wesseler, Justus ; Falck Zepeda, José ; Falck-Zepeda, Jose ; Kilkuwe, Enoch.
    In: IFPRI discussion papers.
    RePEc:fpr:ifprid:767.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. When more is less: the effect of multiple health and nutritional labels in food product choice. (2008). de Magistris, Tiziana ; Barreiro-Hurlé, Jesús ; de-Magistris, T. ; Barreiro-Hurle, J. ; Gracia, A..
    In: 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium.
    RePEc:ags:eaae08:44013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Modeling Yeah- and Nay-Saying to Alternatives in Conjoint Experiments. (2008). Hu, Wuyang.
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6346.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Optimizing Farmland Preservation Choices Across Communities and Jurisdictional Scales: To What Extent are Amenity Values and Selection Criteria Transferable?. (2008). Johnston, Robert ; Duke, Joshua ; Kukielka, Jessica G..
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6243.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiments method?. (2007). Rambonilaza, Tina.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:9225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. What Determines Prediction Errors In Benefits Transfer Models?. (2007). Hanley, Nick ; Colombo, Sergio.
    In: 81st Annual Conference, April 2-4, 2007, Reading University, UK.
    RePEc:ags:aes007:7967.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Public Funding of Environmental Amenities: Contingent Choices Using New Taxes or Existing Revenues for Coastal Land Conservation. (2006). Swallow, Stephen ; McGonagle, Michael P..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:82:y:2006:i:1:p:56-67.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Models. (2006). Siikamäki, Juha ; Layton, David F..
    In: RFF Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. A NEW MARKETING SEGMENTATION APPROACH BASED ON MARGINAL INDIVIDUAL UTILITIES: APPLYING CRM IS NOT A CHIMERA ANYMORE. (2006). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Uncovering the Macrostructure of Tourists’ Preferences. A Choice Experiment Analysis of Tourism Demand to Sardinia. (2006). Cao, Davide ; Brau, Rinaldo.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Opportunities to Improve Household Food Security Through Promoting Informal Maize Marketing Channels: Experience from Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. (2006). Traub, Lulama ; Jayne, Thomas.
    In: Food Security International Development Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:midiwp:54568.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. HYPOTHETICAL (NON)BIAS IN CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: EVIDENCE FROM FRESHWATER PRAWNS. (2005). Hudson, Darren ; Gallardo, R. Karina ; Hanson, Terry .
    In: Experimental.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpex:0503003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Preferences regarding road transports of hazardous materials using choice experiments - any sign of biases?. (2005). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2005_030.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Turner, Robert W. ; Noddin, Laura ; Giuda, Alita .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2005:i:7:p:1-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Turner, Robert ; Noddin, Laura ; Giuda, Alita .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-05q30001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Uncovering the macrostructure of tourists preferences. A choice experiment analysis of tourism demand to Sardinia. (2005). Cao, Davide ; Brau, Rinaldo.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200514.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Exploring Consumer Valuation and Preference Heterogeneity for Functional Foods Using a Choice Experiment: A Case Study of Tomato Juice Containing Soy in Ohio. (2005). Hooker, Neal ; Teratanavat, Ratapol.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19556.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. A Battle of Taste and Environmental Convictions for Ecolabeled Seafood: A Choice Experiment. (2005). Roheim, Cathy ; Johnston, Robert.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19357.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. HECKIT MODELLING OF THE TWO-STAGE TOURIST CHOICE PROCESS: GOING ON HOLIDAY AND TOURISM EXPENDITURES. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2004-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. STOCHASTIC CHOICE ANALYSIS OF TOURISM DESTINATIONS. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Using Choice Experiments to Assess Peoples Preferences for Railway Transports of Hazardous Materials. (2004). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2004_006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. WHO ARE RESOURCE NONUSERS AND WHAT CAN THEY TELL US ABOUT NONUSE VALUES? AN APPLICATION TO COASTAL WETLAND RESTORATION. (2004). Opaluch, James ; Johnston, Robert ; Mazzotta, Marisa J. ; Magnusson, Gisele .
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20353.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. THE VALUE OF THE VIEW: VALUING SCENIC QUALITY USING CHOICE AND CONTINGENT VALUATION MODELS. (2004). Kask, Susan ; Stewart, Steve ; Mathews, Leah Greden.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20049.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. AN APPLICATION OF CHOICE MODELING TO MEASURE U.S. CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS. (2004). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Govindasamy, Ramu ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19964.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. A CHOICE EXPERIMENT MODEL FOR BEEF ATTRIBUTES: WHAT CONSUMER PREFERENCES TELL US. (2004). Umberger, Wendy ; Loureiro, Maria.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19931.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics. (2003). Wright, Robert ; Hanley, Nick ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:12:y:2003:i:1:p:3-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Preferences for Alternative Moose Management Regimes among Finnish Landowners: A Choice Experiment Approach. (2003). Horne, Paula ; Petajisto, Leena .
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:79:y:2003:i:4:p:472-482.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope. (2003). Mourato, Susana.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:141-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Using Stated Preference Methods for Biodiversity Valuation. A critical analysis. (2003). Froer, Oliver.
    In: Diskussionspapiere aus dem Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Hohenheim.
    RePEc:hoh:hohdip:217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. The Value of Road and Railway Safety - an Overview. (2003). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2003_013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. SELF IMAGE AND CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: HYPOTHETICAL AND ACTUAL WILLINGNESS TO PAY. (2003). Johansson-Stenman, Olof ; Svedsater, Henrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Spatial Factors and Stated Preference Values for Public Goods: Considerations for Rural Land Use. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana Marie.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:78:y:2002:i:4:p:481-500.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Comparing Choice Question Formats for Evaluating Natural Resource Tradeoffs. (2002). Breffle, William S. ; Rowe, Robert D..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:78:y:2002:i:2:p:298-314.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Broadband delivered entertainment services: forecasting Australian subscription intentions. (2002). Savage, Scott ; Madden, Gary ; Simpson, Michael.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:10915.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. STATED PREFERENCES AND LENGTH OF RESIDENCY IN RURAL COMMUNITIES: ARE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSERVATION VALUES HETEROGENEOUS?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana Marie.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19683.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. ARE STATED PREFERENCES INVARIANT TO THE PROSPECT OF REAL-MONEY CHOICE?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Newell, Laurienne Whinstanley.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. Risk Perception of Traffic Participants. (2001). van Vuuren, Daniel ; Blaeij, Adriana ; de Blaeij, Arianne.
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20010027.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Complements, Substitutes, Budget Constraints and Valuation. (2000). Hailu, Atakelty ; Boxall, Peter ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:16:y:2000:i:1:p:51-68.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. THE INFLUENCE OF SPATIAL LAND USE PATTERNS ON RURAL AMENITY VALUES AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM A CONTINGENT CHOICE SURVEY. (2000). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana M..
    In: 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea00:21766.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Valuing Multiple Programs to Improve Fish Populations. (1999). Plummer, Mark L. ; Brown, Gardner ; Layton, David F..
    In: Discussion Papers in Economics at the University of Washington.
    RePEc:fth:washer:0042.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-23 18:51:35 || Missing content? Let us know