1. Analyzing preference heterogeneity for soil amenity improvements using discrete choice experiment. (2020). Jetten, Victor ; Ralp, Matthew Oliver.
   In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
   RePEc:spr:endesu:v:22:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-018-0250-8.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Contingent valuation of community forestry programs in Ethiopia: Observing preference anomalies in Double-Bounded CVM. (2012). Koch, Steven ; Gelo, Dambala.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:rza:wpaper:272.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Contingent Valuation of Community Forestry Programs in Ethiopia: Observing Preference Anomalies in Double-Bounded CVM. (2011). Koch, Steven ; Gelo, Dambala.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:pre:wpaper:201124.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. [1] Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M., and Louviere, J.J. (1998). Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80: 64-75.

2. [10] Bennett, J. (2006). Choice modeling and the transfer of environmental values. In Rolfe J. & Bennett J. (eds), Choice modeling and the transfer of environmental values. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Glos GL50 1UA, UK.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

3. [11] Boxall, P.C., Adamowicz, W. (2002). Understanding heterogeneous preference: A latent class approach. Environmental and Resource Economics 23: 421-446.

4. [12] Brey, B., Riera, P., and Mogas, J. (2007). Estimation of forest values using choice experiment modeling: An application to Spanish forests. Ecological Economics 64: 305-312.

5. [13] Carlsson, F., KÃhlin, G., and Mekonnen, A. (2004). Contingent valuation of community plantations in Ethiopia: A look into value elicitation format and intra-household preference variation, Working paper in Economics No.151, Department of Economics, Gothenburg University.

6. [14] Carlsson, F., Frykblom, P., and Liljenstolpe, C. (2003). Valuing wetland attributes: an application of choice experiments. Ecological Economics 47: 95-103.

7. [15] Carlsson, F., and Martinsson, P. (2001). Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay diïer in choice experiments? Application to the valuation of the environment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41: 179â 192.

8. [16] Cooke-St.Clair, P.C., KÃhlin, G., and Hyde,W.F. (2008). Fuelwood, forests and community management: Evidence from household studies. Environment and Development Economics 13:103-135.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. [17] Ezzine de Blas, D., Ruiz-PÃrez , M., and Vermeulen, C. (2011). Management conïicts in Cameroonian community forests. Ecology and Society 16(1): 8 URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/ iss1/art8/
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. [18] EFAP: Ethiopian Forestry Action Program. (1993). Issues and actions, volume III, Addis Ababa: Ministry of Natural Resources Development and Environmental Protection, Transitional Government of Ethiopia.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
11. [19] Fekadu, T., (2007). Overview of natural resources in Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Regional State (SNNPS) of Ethiopia, Proceedings of Policies to increase forest cover in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, 18-19 September, pp 92-103, Addis Ababa, Ethiopian Development Research Institute (EDRI).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

12. [2] Adhikari, B. (2004). Household characteristics and forest dependency: Evidences from common property forest management in Nepal. Ecological Economics 48: 245-257.

13. [20] Ferrini, S. and Scarpa, R. (2007). Designs with a priori information for nonmarket evaluation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53: 342-363.

14. [21] Gebremedhin, B., Pender, J., and Tesfay, G. (2003). Community natural resource management: the case of woodlots in Northern Ethiopia. Environment and Development Economics 8: 129â 148.

15. [22] Greene, W.H., and Hensher, D.A. (2003). A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research Part B 37: 681-698.

16. [23] Hanley, N., Mourato, S., and Wright. R.E. (2001). Choice Modeling approaches: A superior alternative for environmental valuation? Journal of Economic Surveys 15: 436-462.

17. [24] Hanley, N., Wright, R., and Adamowicz,W. (1998). Using choice experiment to value the environment. Environment and Resource Economics 11: 413-428.

18. [25] Hanemann, W.M. (1984). Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66: 332â 341.

19. [26] Hanemann, W.M. (1999). Welfare analysis with discrete choice modelsâ, in Herriges, J. and C. Kling (eds.) Valuing Recreation and the Environment, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

20. [27] Hanemann, W.M., and Kanninen, B. (1996). The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data, in Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EC, and Developing Countries I.J. Bateman and K.G. Willis (eds), Oxford University Press, Oxford.

21. [28] Huber, J., and Zwerina, K. (1996). The importance of utility balance in eïcient choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 33: 307-317.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

22. [29] Jagger, P.J., and Pender, J. (2003). The role of trees for sustainable management of less-favored lands: the case of eucalyptus in Ethiopia. Forest Policy and Economics 5: 83-95.

23. [3] Agrawal, A., and Ostrom., E. (2001). Collective action, property right and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics and Society, 4: 485-514.

24. [30] KÃhlin, G.(1998). The value of social forestry in Orissa, Indiaâ, Ph.D. Thesis 83, Department of Economics, GÃteborg University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

25. [31] KÃhlin, G. (2001). Contingent valuation in project planning and evaluation: The case of social forestry in Orissa, India. Environment and Development Economics 6:237-258.

26. [32] KÃhlin, G., and Amacher, G.S. (2005). Welfare implications of community forest plantations in developing countries: The Orissa Social Forestry Project. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87: 855â869.

27. [33] Krinsky, I., and Robb, A. (1986). On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Review of Economics and Statistics 68: 715â 719.

28. [34] Kuhfeld, W. (2001). Multinomial logit, discrete choice modeling. An introduction to designing choice experiments, and collecting, processing and analyzing choice data with SAS. SAS Institute TS-643.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. [35] Larson, M.A., Ribot, J.C. (2004). Democratic decentralisation through a natural resource Lens: An introduction, The European Journal of Development Research 16: 1â25.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

30. [36] Layton, D., and Brown, G. (2000). Heterogeneous preferences regarding global climate change. Review of Economics and Statistics 82: 616â 624.

31. [37] Lancaster, K.J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy 74: 132-157.

32. [38] Louviere J.J. (1991). Experimental choice analysis: introduction and overview. Journal of Business Research 23: 291-297.

33. [39] McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka, P. (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

34. [4] Alpizar, F., Carlsson, F., and Martinsson, P. (2001). Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation. Economic Issues 8: 83-110.

35. [40] Mekonnen, A. (1999). Rural household biomass fuel production and consumption in Ethiopia: A case study. Journal of Forest Economics 5:1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

36. [41] Mekonnen, A. (2000). Valuation of community forestry in Ethiopia: a contingent valuation study of rural households. Environment and Development Economics 5: 289-308.

37. [42] Mekuria. W., Veldkamp, E., Tilahun, T., and Olschewski, R. (2010). Economic valuation of land restoration: The case of exclosure established on communal grazing land in Tigeray, Ethiopia. Land Degradation and Development DOI: 10.1002/idr.1001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

38. [43] Milon, J.W.,and Scrogin, D. (2006). Latent preferences and valuation of wetland ecosystem restoration. Ecological Economics 56: 162-175.

39. [44] Mogas J., Riera, P., and Bernnett, J. (2006). Comparison of contingent valuation and choice modeling with second order interactions. Journal of Forest Economics 12: 5-30.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

40. [45] Mogas, J., Riera, P., and .Brey, R. (2009). Combining contingent valuation and choice experiment: A forestry application in Spain. Environmental and Resources Economics 43: 535-551.

41. [46] Revelt, D., and Train, K. (1998). Mixed logit with repeated choices: householdsâ choices of appliance eïciency level. Review of Economics and Statistics 80: 647-657.

42. [47] Ostrom, E. (1999). Self-Governance and Forest Resources, Occasional Paper No. 20, CIFOR.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

43. [48] Richards, M. (1997). Common property resource institutions and forest management in Latin America. Development and Change 28: 95-117.

44. [49] Riera, P., and Mogas, J. (2004). Finding the social value of forests through stated preference methods: A Mediterranean forest valuation exercise, Silva Lusitana n. especial: 17-34.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

45. [5] Angelsen, A., and Koimowitz, D. (1999). Rethinking the causes of deforestation- lessons from economic models. World Bank Research Observer 14: 73-98.

46. [50] Qin, P., Carlsson, F., and Xu, J. (2009). Forestland reform in China: What do the farmers want? A choice experiment on property preferences, Working paper in Economics, No. 370, Department of Economics, Gothenburg University School of Business.

47. [51] Shylendra, H.S. (2002). Environmental Rehabilitation and Livelihood Impact: Emerging Trends from Ethiopia and Gujarat. Economic and Political Weekly 31: 3286-3292.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
48. [52] Sikor, T. (2005). Analysing community-based forestry: Local, political and agrarian perspectives. Forest Policy and Economics 8: 339â 349.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
49. [53] Swait, J.R. (1994). Structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional revealed preference choice data. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 1:77-89.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. [54] Tefera, M., Teketay, D., Hulten, H., and Yemshewa, Y. (2005). The role of communities in closed area management in Ethiopia. Mountain Research and Development 25: 44-50.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

51. [55] Train, K. (1998). Recreation demand models with taste diïerences over people. Land Economics 74(2): 230â 239.

52. [56] Train, K. (1999). Halton sequences for mixed logit. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

53. [57] Wang, X., Bernnett, J., Xie, C., Zhang, Z., and Liang, D. (2007). Estimating non-market environmental beneït of conversion of cropland to forest and grassland programs: A choice experiment modeling approach. Ecological Economics, 63:114-125.

54. [58] World Bank.(2008).Ethiopian Sustainable Land Management Project Document, Report No: 42927-ET2008, Washington, DC: World Bank. World Bank/Environmental & Natural Resources Management Sustainable Development Department AFTSN Africa Region.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
55. [7] Babulo, B. (2007). Economic valuation and management of common-pool resources: The case of exclosure in the highlands of Tigeray, northern Ethiopia, PhD Dissertation, Department Landbeheer en-Economie, Katholieke Universitiet, Leuven.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
56. [9] Benin, S., Pender,J., and Ehui, S. (2002). Policies for sustainable land management in East African highlands. EPTD Workshop paper, No.13.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Demand response to improved walking infrastructure: A study into the economics of walking and health behaviour change. (2015). Hunter, Ruth F ; Tully, Mark A ; Hutchinson, George W ; Kee, Frank ; Longo, Alberto.
   In: Social Science & Medicine.
   RePEc:eee:socmed:v:143:y:2015:i:c:p:107-116.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Valuing type and scope of ecosystem conservation: A meta-analysis. (2015). HUSSAIN, Anwar ; Phillips, Spencer ; Hjerpe, Evan.
   In: Journal of Forest Economics.
   RePEc:eee:foreco:v:21:y:2015:i:1:p:32-50.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Valuing Grassland Restoration: Proximity to Substitutes and Trade-offs among Conservation Attributes. (2014). Dissanayake, Sahan ; Ando, Amy ; Sahan T. M. Dissanayake, .
   In: Land Economics.
   RePEc:uwp:landec:v:90:y:2014:ii:1:p:237-259.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. The influence of individuals in forming collective household preferences for water quality. (2014). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Thiene, Mara ; Rungie, Cam.
   In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
   RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:68:y:2014:i:1:p:161-174.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. The Effects of Intertemporal Considerations on Consumer Preferences for Biofuels. (2013). Khachatryan, Hayk ; casavant, ken ; Joireman, Jeff.
   In: 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C..
   RePEc:ags:aaea13:150334.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. How Can Behavioral Economics Inform Nonmarket Valuation? An Example from the Preference Reversal Literature. (2011). List, John ; Alevy, Jonathan ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
   In: Land Economics.
   RePEc:uwp:landec:v:87:y:2011:iii:1:p:365-381.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. The Equity-Efficiency Trade-off in Environmental Policy: Evidence from Stated Preferences. (2010). Atkinson, Giles ; Dietz, Simon.
   In: Land Economics.
   RePEc:uwp:landec:v:86:y:2010:iii:1:p423-443.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Preferences for long-term care services: Willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment. (2010). Koolman, Xander ; Stolk, Elly A. ; Nieboer, Anna P..
   In: Social Science & Medicine.
   RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:9:p:1317-1325.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Identifying Consumer Preferences for Nutrition Information on Grocery Store Shelf Labels. (2009). McCluskey, Jill ; Chouinard, Hayley ; Berning, Joshua ; Manning, Kenneth ; Sprott, David.
   In: Research Reports.
   RePEc:ags:uconnr:149962.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Sequencing Anomalies in Choice Experiments. (2008). pinto-prades, jose-luis ; Pintoprades, Jose Luis ; Day, Brett.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pab:wpaper:08.10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Introducing a genetically modified banana in Uganda: Social benefits, costs, and consumer perceptions. (2008). Wesseler, Justus ; Falck Zepeda, José ; Falck-Zepeda, Jose ; Kilkuwe, Enoch.
    In: IFPRI discussion papers.
    RePEc:fpr:ifprid:767.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. When more is less: the effect of multiple health and nutritional labels in food product choice. (2008). de Magistris, Tiziana ; Barreiro-Hurlé, Jesús ; de-Magistris, T. ; Barreiro-Hurle, J. ; Gracia, A..
    In: 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium.
    RePEc:ags:eaae08:44013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Modeling Yeah- and Nay-Saying to Alternatives in Conjoint Experiments. (2008). Hu, Wuyang.
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6346.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Optimizing Farmland Preservation Choices Across Communities and Jurisdictional Scales: To What Extent are Amenity Values and Selection Criteria Transferable?. (2008). Johnston, Robert ; Duke, Joshua ; Kukielka, Jessica G..
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6243.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiments method?. (2007). Rambonilaza, Tina.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:9225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. What Determines Prediction Errors In Benefits Transfer Models?. (2007). Hanley, Nick ; Colombo, Sergio.
    In: 81st Annual Conference, April 2-4, 2007, Reading University, UK.
    RePEc:ags:aes007:7967.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Public Funding of Environmental Amenities: Contingent Choices Using New Taxes or Existing Revenues for Coastal Land Conservation. (2006). Swallow, Stephen ; McGonagle, Michael P..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:82:y:2006:i:1:p:56-67.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Models. (2006). Siikamäki, Juha ; Layton, David F..
    In: RFF Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. A NEW MARKETING SEGMENTATION APPROACH BASED ON MARGINAL INDIVIDUAL UTILITIES: APPLYING CRM IS NOT A CHIMERA ANYMORE. (2006). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Uncovering the Macrostructure of Tourists’ Preferences. A Choice Experiment Analysis of Tourism Demand to Sardinia. (2006). Cao, Davide ; Brau, Rinaldo.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Opportunities to Improve Household Food Security Through Promoting Informal Maize Marketing Channels: Experience from Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. (2006). Traub, Lulama ; Jayne, Thomas.
    In: Food Security International Development Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:midiwp:54568.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. HYPOTHETICAL (NON)BIAS IN CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: EVIDENCE FROM FRESHWATER PRAWNS. (2005). Hudson, Darren ; Gallardo, R. Karina ; Hanson, Terry .
    In: Experimental.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpex:0503003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Preferences regarding road transports of hazardous materials using choice experiments - any sign of biases?. (2005). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2005_030.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Turner, Robert W. ; Noddin, Laura ; Giuda, Alita .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2005:i:7:p:1-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Turner, Robert ; Noddin, Laura ; Giuda, Alita .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-05q30001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Uncovering the macrostructure of tourists preferences. A choice experiment analysis of tourism demand to Sardinia. (2005). Cao, Davide ; Brau, Rinaldo.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200514.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Exploring Consumer Valuation and Preference Heterogeneity for Functional Foods Using a Choice Experiment: A Case Study of Tomato Juice Containing Soy in Ohio. (2005). Hooker, Neal ; Teratanavat, Ratapol.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19556.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. A Battle of Taste and Environmental Convictions for Ecolabeled Seafood: A Choice Experiment. (2005). Roheim, Cathy ; Johnston, Robert.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19357.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. HECKIT MODELLING OF THE TWO-STAGE TOURIST CHOICE PROCESS: GOING ON HOLIDAY AND TOURISM EXPENDITURES. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2004-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. STOCHASTIC CHOICE ANALYSIS OF TOURISM DESTINATIONS. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Using Choice Experiments to Assess Peoples Preferences for Railway Transports of Hazardous Materials. (2004). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2004_006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. WHO ARE RESOURCE NONUSERS AND WHAT CAN THEY TELL US ABOUT NONUSE VALUES? AN APPLICATION TO COASTAL WETLAND RESTORATION. (2004). Opaluch, James ; Johnston, Robert ; Mazzotta, Marisa J. ; Magnusson, Gisele .
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20353.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. THE VALUE OF THE VIEW: VALUING SCENIC QUALITY USING CHOICE AND CONTINGENT VALUATION MODELS. (2004). Kask, Susan ; Stewart, Steve ; Mathews, Leah Greden.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20049.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. AN APPLICATION OF CHOICE MODELING TO MEASURE U.S. CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS. (2004). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Govindasamy, Ramu ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19964.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. A CHOICE EXPERIMENT MODEL FOR BEEF ATTRIBUTES: WHAT CONSUMER PREFERENCES TELL US. (2004). Umberger, Wendy ; Loureiro, Maria.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19931.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics. (2003). Wright, Robert ; Hanley, Nick ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:12:y:2003:i:1:p:3-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Preferences for Alternative Moose Management Regimes among Finnish Landowners: A Choice Experiment Approach. (2003). Horne, Paula ; Petajisto, Leena .
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:79:y:2003:i:4:p:472-482.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope. (2003). Mourato, Susana.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:141-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Using Stated Preference Methods for Biodiversity Valuation. A critical analysis. (2003). Froer, Oliver.
    In: Diskussionspapiere aus dem Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Hohenheim.
    RePEc:hoh:hohdip:217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. The Value of Road and Railway Safety - an Overview. (2003). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2003_013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. SELF IMAGE AND CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: HYPOTHETICAL AND ACTUAL WILLINGNESS TO PAY. (2003). Johansson-Stenman, Olof ; Svedsater, Henrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Spatial Factors and Stated Preference Values for Public Goods: Considerations for Rural Land Use. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana Marie.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:78:y:2002:i:4:p:481-500.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Comparing Choice Question Formats for Evaluating Natural Resource Tradeoffs. (2002). Breffle, William S. ; Rowe, Robert D..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:78:y:2002:i:2:p:298-314.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Broadband delivered entertainment services: forecasting Australian subscription intentions. (2002). Savage, Scott ; Madden, Gary ; Simpson, Michael.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:10915.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. STATED PREFERENCES AND LENGTH OF RESIDENCY IN RURAL COMMUNITIES: ARE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSERVATION VALUES HETEROGENEOUS?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana Marie.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19683.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. ARE STATED PREFERENCES INVARIANT TO THE PROSPECT OF REAL-MONEY CHOICE?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Newell, Laurienne Whinstanley.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. Risk Perception of Traffic Participants. (2001). van Vuuren, Daniel ; Blaeij, Adriana ; de Blaeij, Arianne.
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20010027.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Complements, Substitutes, Budget Constraints and Valuation. (2000). Hailu, Atakelty ; Boxall, Peter ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:16:y:2000:i:1:p:51-68.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. THE INFLUENCE OF SPATIAL LAND USE PATTERNS ON RURAL AMENITY VALUES AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM A CONTINGENT CHOICE SURVEY. (2000). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana M..
    In: 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea00:21766.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Valuing Multiple Programs to Improve Fish Populations. (1999). Plummer, Mark L. ; Brown, Gardner ; Layton, David F..
    In: Discussion Papers in Economics at the University of Washington.
    RePEc:fth:washer:0042.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-23 14:37:43 || Missing content? Let us know