This document has not been cited yet.

1. Adaval, R., Wyer, R.S. (2011). Conscious and Nonconscious Influences of a Price Anchor: Effects on Willingness to Pay for Related and Unrelated Products. Journal of Marketing Research 48, 355-365.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

2. Alevy, J.E., Craig Landry, C.E., List, J. (2011). Field Experiments on Anchoring of Economic Valuations. University of Alaska Anchorage, Department of Economics Working Paper, 201102.

3. Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D. (2003). “Coherent arbitrariness”: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 73-105. doi: 10.1162/00335530360535153 Bateman, I.J., Burgess, D., Hutchinson, W.G., Matthews, D.I. (2008). Learning Design Contingent Valuation (LDCV): NOAA Guidelines, Preference Learning, and Coherent Arbitrariness. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55, 127-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2007.08.003.

4. Bergman, O., Ellingsen, T., Johannesson, M., Svensson, C. (2010). Anchoring and cognitive ability. Economics Letters 107, 66-68. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2009.12.028.

5. Bofinger, P., Schmidt, R. (2003). On the reliability of professional exchange rate forecasts: an empirical analysis for the €/US-$ rate. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 17, 437449. doi: 10.1007/s11408-003-0403-z.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

6. Bucchianeri, G.W., Minson, J. (2013). A homeowner's dilemma: Anchoring in residential real estate transactions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 89, 76-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.01.010.

7. Campbell, S.D., Sharpe, S.A. (2009). Anchoring bias in consensus forecasts and its effect on market prices. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 44, 369-390. doi: 10.1017/S0022109009090127.

8. Cecchi, F., Bulte, E. (2013). Does market experience promote rational choice? Experimental evidence from rural Ethiopia. Economic Development and Cultural Change 61 (2), 407-429. doi: 10.1086/668275.

9. Cen, L., Hilary, G., Wei, K.C.J. (2013). The Role of Anchoring Bias in the Equity Market: Evidence from Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts and Stock Returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 48, 47-76. doi:10.1017/S0022109012000609.

10. Chapman, G.B., Johnson, E.J. (1999). Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values.

11. Cox, J., Hayne, S. (2006). Barking up the right tree: are small groups rational agents?.

12. Critcher, C.R., Gilovich, T. (2008). Incidental environmental anchors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 21, 241-251. doi: 10.1002/bdm.586.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
13. Critcher, C.R., Rosenzweig, E.L., Gilovich, T. (2014). Beyond Anchoring: Contextual Influence on Adjustment. University of California, Haas School of Business Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

14. Crusius, J., van Horen, F., Mussweiler, T. (2012). Why process matters: a social cognition perspective on economic behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology 33, 677-685. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2011.09.004.

15. Elaboration and consequences of anchored estimates: an attitudinal perspective on numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44, 1465-1476. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., Strack, F. (2005). The last word in court: a hidden disadvantage for the defense. Law and Human Behavior 29, 705-722. doi: 10.1007/s10979-005-8380-7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

17. Englich, B., Soder, K. (2009). Moody experts: how mood and expertise influence judgmental anchoring. Judgment and Decision Making 4, 41-50. doi: 10.1007/s10979-005-8380-7.

18. Epley, N., Gilovich, T. (2005). When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self-generated and externally provided anchors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 18, 199-212. doi: 10.1002/bdm.495.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. Epley, N., Gilovich, T. (2010). Anchoring unbound. Journal of Consumer Psychology 20 (1), 20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.12.005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

20. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics 10, 171-178.

21. Frederick, S.W., Mochon, D. (2012). A scale distortion theory of anchoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141 (1), 124-133. doi: 10.1037/a0024006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

22. Fudenberg, D., Levine, D.K., Maniadis, Z. (2012). On the robustness of anchoring effects in WTP and WTA experiments. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4, 131-145. doi: 10.1257/mic.4.2.131.

23. Fujiwara, I., Ichiue, H., Nakazono, Y., Shigemi, Y. (2013). Financial markets forecasts revisited: Are they rational, stubborn or jumpy?. Economics Letters 118 (3), 526-530. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.12.037.

24. Furnham, A., Boo, H.C. (2011). A literature review of the anchoring effect. The Journal of Socio-Economics 40, 35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2010.10.008.

25. Greiner, B. (2004). An online recruiting system for economic experiments. In: Kremer, K., Macho, V. (Eds.), Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003. GWDG Bericht 63. Ges. für Wiss. Datenverarbeitung, Goettingen, 79-93.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Hess, D., Orbe, S. (2013). Irrationality or efficiency of macroeconomic survey forecasts? Implications from the anchoring bias test. Review of Finance 17 (6), 2097-2131. doi: 10.1093/rof/rfs037.

27. Hinsz, V.B., Indahl, K.E. (1995). Assimilation to anchors for damage awards in a mock civil trial. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25, 991-1026. doi: 10.1111/j.15591816. 1995.tb02386.x. Jacowitz, K.E., Kahneman, D. (1995). Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21, 1161-1166. doi:10.1177/01461672952111004.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Johnson, J.E.V., Schnytzer, A., Liu, S. (2009). To what extent do investors in a financial market anchor their judgements excessively? Evidence from the Hong Kong horserace betting market. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 22, 410-434. doi: 10.1002/bdm.640.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Kerr, N.L., MacCoun, R.J., Kramer, G.P. (1996). Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. Psychological Review 103 (4), 687-719.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Kerr, N.L., Tindale, R.S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 55, 623-655. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

31. Kugler, T., Kausel, E., Kocher, M. (2012). Are groups more rational than individuals? A review of interactive decision making in groups. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 3 (4), 471-482. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1184.

32. Laughlin, P.R. (1980). Social combination processes of cooperative problem-solving groups on verbal intellective tasks, in: Fishbein, M. (Ed.), Progress in Social Psychology, Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ, 127-155.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

33. Laughlin, P.R. (2011). Group Problem Solving. Princeton University Press.

34. Laughlin, P.R., Bonner, B.L., Miner, A.G. (2002). Groups perform better than the best individuals on Letter-to-Numbers problems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 88, 606-620.

35. Lawrence, M., O’Connor, M. (2000). Sales forecasting updates: how good are they in practice?. International Journal of Forecasting 16 (3), 369-382. doi: 10.1016/S01692070 (00)00059-5.

36. Levitt, S.D., List, J.A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world?. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21 (2), 153-174. doi: 10.1257/jep.21.2.153.

37. List, J.A. (2003). Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 41-71. doi: 10.1162/00335530360535144.

38. List, J.A. (2004a). Testing neoclassical competitive theory in multilateral decentralized markets. Journal of Political Economy, 112 (5), 1131-1156. doi: 10.1086/422564.

39. List, J.A. (2004b). Neoclassical theory versus prospect theory: Evidence from the marketplace. Econometrica, 72 (2), 615-625. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00502.x. List, J.A. (2005). The behavioralist meets the market: Measuring social preferences and reputation effects in actual transactions. National Bureau of Economic Research, No. 11616.

40. List, J.A., Millimet, D.L. (2008). The market: Catalyst for rationality and filter of irrationality.

41. Maniadis, Z., Tufano, F., List, J.A. (2014). One Swallow Doesn't Make a Summer: New Evidence on Anchoring Effects. The American Economic Review 104 (1), 277-290. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.1.277.

42. McAlvanah, P., Moul C.C. (2013). The House Doesn't Always Win: Evidence of Anchoring Among Australian Bookies, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 90, 87-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.03.009.

43. McElroy, T., Dowd, K. (2007). Susceptibility to anchoring effects: how openness-toexperience influences responses to anchoring cues. Judgment and Decision Making 2 (1), 4853.

44. Meub, L., Proeger, T., Bizer, K. (2013). Anchoring: a valid explanation for biased forecasts when rational predictions are easily accessible and well incentivized? CEGE Discussion Paper, No. 166.

45. Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., Pfeiffer, T. (2000). Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect: considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26, 1142-1150. doi: 10.1177/01461672002611010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. Nunes, J.C., Boatwright, P. (2004). Incidental prices and their effect on willingness to pay.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

47. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 79, 115-153. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2841 Charness, G., Sutter, M. (2012). Groups make better Self-Interested Decisions. Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (3), 157-176. doi: 10.1257/jep.26.3.157.

48. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43 (1), 1-28. doi: 10.1016/07495978 (89)90055-1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
49. Plous, S. (1989). Thinking the unthinkable: the effects of anchoring on likelihood estimates of nuclear war. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 19, 67-91. doi: 10.1111/j.15591816. 1989.tb01221.x. Russo, J.E. (2010). Understanding the effect of a numerical anchor. Journal of Consumer Psychology 20 (1), 25-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.12.006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. Simmons, J.P., LeBoeuf, R.A., Nelson, L.D. (2010). The Effect of Accuracy Motivation on Anchoring and Adjustment: Do People Adjust From Provided Anchors?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99, 917-932. doi: 10.1037/a0021540.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
51. Simonson, I., Drolet, A. (2004). Anchoring Effects on Consumers’ Willingness-to-Pay and Willingness-to-Accept. Journal of consumer research 31 (3), 681-90. doi: 10.1086/425103.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

52. Smith, V.L., Walker, J. (1993). Monetary rewards and decision cost in experimental economics. Economic Inquiry 31, 245-261. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1993.tb00881.x. Sniezek, J.A., Henry, R.A. (1989). Accuracy and confidence in group judgment.

53. Stahlberg, D., Eller, F., Maass, A., Frey, D. (1995). We knew it all along: Hindsight bias in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 63 (1), 46-58. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1995.1060.

54. Sugden, R., Zheng, J., Zizzo, D.J. (2013). Not all anchors are created equal. Journal of Economic Psychology 39, 21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2013.06.008.

55. Tufano, F. (2010). Are ‘True’ Preferences Revealed in Repeated Markets? An Experimental Demonstration of Context-Dependent Valuations. Experimental Economics 13 (1), 1-13. doi: 10.1007/s10683-009-9226-8.

56. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
57. Wegener, D.T., Petty, R.E., Blankenship, K.L., Detweiler-Bedell, B. (2010a). Elaboration and numerical anchoring: implications of attitude theories for consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology 20, 5-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.12.003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
58. Wegener, D.T., Petty, R.E., Blankenship, K.L., Detweiler-Bedell, B. (2010b). Elaboration and numerical anchoring: Breadth, depth, and the role of (non-) thoughtful processes in anchoring theories. Journal of Consumer Psychology 20 (1), 28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.12.007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

59. Whyte, G., Sebenius, J.K. (1997). The effect of multiple anchors on anchoring in individual and group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 69 (1) 74-85. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1996.2674.

60. Wilson, T.D., Houston, C.E., Etling, K.M., Brekke, N. (1996). A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents. Journal of Experimental Psychology 125, 387402. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.125.4.387.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

61. Wright, W.F., Anderson, U. (1989). Effects of situation familiarity and financial incentives on use of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic for probability assessment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 44, 68-82. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90035-6.

1. 2021 Summary Data of Natural Field Experiments Published on Fieldexperiments.com. (2022). List, John.
   In: Natural Field Experiments.
   RePEc:feb:natura:00747.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Framed Field Experiments: 2021 Summary on Fieldexperiments.com. (2022). List, John.
   In: Framed Field Experiments.
   RePEc:feb:framed:00752.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. 2021 Summary Data of Artefactual Field Experiments Published on Fieldexperiments.com. (2021). List, John.
   In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
   RePEc:feb:artefa:00749.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Anchoring bias in recall data: Evidence from Central America. (2016). Murphy, Mike ; Hernandez, Manuel ; Godlonton, Susan.
   In: IFPRI discussion papers.
   RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1534.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Can anchoring explain biased forecasts? Experimental evidence. (2016). Proeger, Till ; Meub, Lukas.
   In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance.
   RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:12:y:2016:i:c:p:1-13.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Anchoring Effect in Context of a Familiar Good: A Case Study of Irrigation Water Supply in Rural India. (2015). Biswas, Durba.
   In: Bangladesh Development Studies.
   RePEc:ris:badest:0791.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. A Glimpse into the World of High Capacity Givers: Experimental Evidence from a University Capital Campaign. (2015). List, John ; Levitt, Steven ; Levin, Tova.
   In: Natural Field Experiments.
   RePEc:feb:natura:00409.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Behavioral Biases of Individual Investors: The Effect of Anchoring. (2015). Zaiane, Salma.
   In: Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences.
   RePEc:ejn:ejssjr:v:3:y:2015:i:1:p:13-19.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Anchoring in social context. (2015). Proeger, Till E. ; Meub, Lukas.
   In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
   RePEc:eee:soceco:v:55:y:2015:i:c:p:29-39.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Learning how to choose—effects of instructional choice sets in discrete choice experiments. (2015). Meyerhoff, Jürgen ; Glenk, Klaus.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:41:y:2015:i:c:p:122-142.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. An experimental study on social anchoring. (2014). Proeger, Till ; Meub, Lukas.
    In: University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:zbw:cegedp:196.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Are groups less behavioral? The case of anchoring. (2014). Proeger, Till ; Meub, Lukas.
    In: University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:zbw:cegedp:188.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. One Swallow Doesnt Make a Summer: New Evidence on Anchoring Effects. (2014). Tufano, Fabio ; Maniadis, Zacharias ; List, John.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:104:y:2014:i:1:p:277-90.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Anchoring: A valid explanation for biased forecasts when rational predictions are easily accessible and well incentivized?. (2013). Proeger, Till ; Meub, Lukas ; Bizer, Kilian.
    In: University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:zbw:cegedp:166.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. One Swallow Doesnt Make a Summer: New Evidence on Anchoring Effects. (2013). Tufano, Fabio ; Maniadis, Zacharias ; List, John.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:not:notcdx:2013-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Not all anchors are created equal. (2013). Zizzo, Daniel ; Sugden, Robert ; Zheng, Jiwei.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:39:y:2013:i:c:p:21-31.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. The house doesn’t always win: Evidence of anchoring among Australian bookies. (2013). Moul, Charles ; McAlvanah, Patrick.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:90:y:2013:i:c:p:87-99.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. One Swallow Does not Make a Summer: New Evidence on Anchoring Effects. (2013). Maniadis, Zacharias ; List, John ; Tufano, Fabio.
    In: Levine's Working Paper Archive.
    RePEc:cla:levarc:786969000000000824.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. On the Robustness of Anchoring Effects in WTP and WTA Experiments. (2012). Maniadis, Zacharias ; Levine, David ; Fudenberg, Drew.
    In: Scholarly Articles.
    RePEc:hrv:faseco:11005333.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. On the Robustness of Anchoring Effects in WTP and WTA Experiments. (2012). Maniadis, Zacharias ; Levine, David ; Fudenberg, Drew.
    In: American Economic Journal: Microeconomics.
    RePEc:aea:aejmic:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:131-45.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. How Much Does Expertise Reduce Behavioral Biases? The Case of Anchoring Effects in Stock Return Estimates. (2008). Puttonen, Vesa ; Kaustia, Markku ; Alho, Eeva.
    In: Financial Management.
    RePEc:bla:finmgt:v:37:y:2008:i:3:p:391-412.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-03 21:20:06 || Missing content? Let us know