create a website

Does online fundraising increase charitable giving? A nation-wide field experiment on Facebook. (2020). Adena, Maja ; Hager, Anselm.
In: Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change.
RePEc:zbw:wzbeoc:spii2020302.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 4

Citations received by this document

Cites: 66

References cited by this document

Cocites: 54

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Asking to give: coordinated fundraising and giving. (2024). Schmitz, Jan ; Grieder, Manuel ; Schubert, Renate.
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2024 (Berlin): Upcoming Labor Market Challenges.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc24:302438.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. How can we improve tax incentives for charitable giving? Lessons from field experiments in fundraising. (2021). Adena, Maja.
    In: EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters.
    RePEc:zbw:espost:251718.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. It’s me again… Ask Avoidance and the Dynamics of Charitable Giving. (2021). Spath, Maximilian.
    In: CEPA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:pot:cepadp:38.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Is the Supply of Charitable Donations Fixed? Evidence from Deadly Tornadoes. (2020). Marx, Benjamin ; Deryugina, Tatyana.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27078.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Adena, Hager Fundraising on Facebook Banerjee, A., Chassang, S., and Snowberg, E. (2017b). Decision Theoretic Approaches to Experiment Design and External Validity. In Banerjee, A. V. and Duflo, E., editors, Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, vol.1, chapter 4, pages 141–174. North Holland.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Adena, Hager Fundraising on Facebook Gallier, C., Goeschl, T., Kesternich, M., Lohse, J., Reif, C., and Römer, D. (2019). Inter-charity competition under spatial differentiation: Sorting, crowding, and spillovers.

  3. Adena, Hager Fundraising on Facebook Lewis, R. A. and Rao, J. M. (2015). The Unfavorable Economics of Measuring the. Quarterly Journal of Economics, pages 1941–1973.

  4. Adena, M. (2016). Nonprofit organizations, free media and donor’s trust. Journal of Economics, 118(3):239–263.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Adena, M. and Huck, S. (2019a). Giving once, giving twice: A two-period field experiment on intertemporal crowding in charitable giving. Journal of Public Economics, 172:127–134.

  6. Adena, M. and Huck, S. (2019b). Online Fundraising, Self-Image, and the Long-Term Impact of Ask Avoidance. Management Science, page mnsc.2018.3232.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Adena, M. and Huck, S. (2019c). Personalized fundraising: A field experiment on threshold matching of donations.

  8. Adena, M., Alizade, J., Bohner, F., Harke, J., and Mesters, F. (2019). Quality certification for nonprofits, charitable giving, and donor’s trust: Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 159:75–100.

  9. Adena, M., Enikolopov, R., Petrova, M., Santarosa, V., and Zhuravskaya, E. (2015). Radio and the Rise of The Nazis in Prewar Germany. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(4):1885–1939.

  10. Adena, M., Huck, S., and Rasul, I. (2014). Charitable Giving and Nonbinding Contribution-Level Suggestions Evidence from a Field Experiment. Review of Behavioral Economics, 1(3):275–293.

  11. Alatas, V., Banerjee, A., Chandrasekhar, A. G., Hanna, R., and Olken, B. A. (2016). Network structure and the aggregation of information:theory and evidence from Indonesia. American Economic Review.

  12. All discussion papers are downloadable: http://www.wzb.eu/en/publications/discussion-papers/markets-and-choice Discussion Papers of the Research Area Markets and Choice 2020 Research Unit: Economics of Change Anselm Hager and Justin Valasek SP II 2020-301 Refugees and social capital: Evidence from Northern Lebanon Maja Adena and Anselm Hager SP II 2020-302 Does online fundraising increase charitable giving? A nation-wide field experiment on Facebook

  13. Andreoni, J. (1995). Warm-Glow versus Cold-Prickle: The Effects of Positive and Negative Framing on Cooperation in Experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1):1–21.

  14. Andreoni, J. and Rao, J. M. (2011). The power of asking: How communication affects selfishness, empathy, and altruism. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7-8):513–520.

  15. Andreoni, J., Koessler, A.-K., and Serra-Garcia, M. (2018). Who Gives? The Roles of Empathy and Impulsivity. In Scharf, K. and Tonin, M., editors, The Economics of Philanthropy: Donations and Fundraising.

  16. Andreoni, J., Rao, J. M., and Trachtman, H. (2017). Avoiding The Ask: A Field Experiment on Altruism, Empathy, and Charitable Giving. Journal of Political Economy, 125(3):625–653.

  17. Bøg, M., Harmgart, H., Huck, S., and Jeffers, A. M. (2012). Fundraising on the internet. Kyklos, 65(1):18–30.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Banerjee, A., Banerji, R., Berry, J., Duflo, E., Kannan, H., Mukerji, S., Shotland, M., and Walton, M. (2017a). From proof of concept to scalable policies: Challenges and solutions, with an application. In Journal of Economic Perspectives, volume 31, pages 73–102. American Economic Association.

  19. Banerjee, A., Chandrasekhar, A. G., Duflo, E., and Jackson, M. O. (2019). Using Gossips to Spread Information: Theory and Evidence from Two Randomized Controlled Trials. Review of Economic Studies.

  20. Batson, C. D., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., and Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2):290–302.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Bertrand, M., Karlan, D., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., and Zinman, J. (2010). What’s advertising content worth? Evidence from a consumer credit marketing field experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1):263–306.

  22. Bilodeaua, M. and Slivinski, A. (1997). Rival charities. Journal of Public Economics, 66(3):449–467.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Blake, T., Nosko, C., and Tadelis, S. (2015). Consumer Heterogeneity and Paid Search Effectiveness: A Large-Scale Field Experiment. Econometrica, 83(1):155–174.

  24. Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., and Fowler, J. H. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415):295–298.

  25. Castillo, M., Petrie, R., and Wardell, C. (2014). Fundraising through online social networks: A field experiment on peer-to-peer solicitation. Journal of Public Economics, 114:29–35.

  26. Chen, Y., Li, X., and MacKie-Mason, J. (2006). Online Fund-raising Mechanisms: A Field Experiment. Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy, 5(2, Article 4).

  27. Deryugina, T. and Marx, B. M. (2020). Is the Supply of Charitable Donations Fixed? Evidence from Tornadoes. 61820(January):1–32.

  28. Donkers, B., van Diepen, M., and Franses, P. H. (2017). Do charities get more when they ask more often? Evidence from a unique field experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66:58–65.

  29. Drago, F., Mengel, F., and Traxler, C. (2020). Compliance Behavior in Networks: Evidence from a Field Experiment. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.

  30. Eckel, C., Grossman, P. J., and Milano, A. (2007). Is more information always better? An experimental study of charitable giving and Hurricane Katrina. Southern Economic Journal, 74(2):388–411.

  31. Exley, C. (2018). Incentives for Prosocial Behavior: The Role of Reputations. Management Science, 64(5):2460–2471.

  32. Filiz-Ozbay, E. and Uler, N. (2019). Demand for giving to multiple charities: An experimental study. Journal of the European Economic Association, 17(3):725–753.

  33. Fong, C. M. and Oberholzer-Gee, F. (2011). Truth in giving: Experimental evidence on the welfare effects of informed giving to the poor. Journal of Public Economics, 95(5-6):436–444.

  34. Gangadharan, L., Grossman, P. J., Jones, K., and Leister, C. M. (2018). Paternalistic giving: Restricting recipient choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 151:143–170.

  35. Gee, L. K. and Meer, J. (2019). The altruism budget: measuring and encouraging charitable giving. In Powell, W. W. and Bromley, P., editors, The Nonprofit Sector A Research Handbook, Third Edition. Stanford University Press.

  36. Gneezy, U., Keenan, E. A., and Gneezy, A. (2014). Avoiding overhead aversion in charity. Science, 346(6209):632–5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Grieder, M. and Schmitz, J. (2020). Moral licensing or substitution? The impact of multiple opportunities to give on contributions to charity – Evidence from the field and the lab. pages 1–34.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Hager, A. (2018). Do Online Ads Sway Elections? Evidence from a Field Experiment. Mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Hager, A. (2019). Do Online Ads Influence Vote Choice? Political Communication, 00(00):1–18.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Jenni, K. E. and Loewenstein, G. (1997). Explaining the “ Identifiable Victim Effect ”. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14:235–257.

  41. Johnson, G. A., Lewis, R. A., and Nubbemeyer, E. I. (2017). Ghost Ads: Improving the Economics of Measuring Online Ad Effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(6):867–884.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Kamdar, A., Levitt, S. D., List, J. A., Mullaney, B., and Syverson, C. (2015). Once and Done: Leveraging Behavioral Economics to Increase Charitable Contributions.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Karlan, D. and Wood, D. H. (2017). The effect of effectiveness: Donor response to aid effectiveness in a direct mail fundraising experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66:1–8.

  44. Kessler, J. B. and Milkman, K. L. (2018). Identity in Charitable Giving. Management Science, 64(2):845–859.

  45. Krieg, J. and Samek, A. (2017). When charities compete: A laboratory experiment with simultaneous public goods. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66:40–57.

  46. Lacetera, N., Macis, M., and Slonim, R. (2012). Will there be blood? Incentives and substitution effects in pro-social behavior. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4(1):186–223.

  47. Lambrecht, A. and Tucker, C. (2019). Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study of Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads. Management Science, (August) :mnsc.2018.3093.

  48. Landry, C. E., Lange, A., List, J. A., Price, M. K., and Rupp, N. G. (2006). Toward an Understanding of the Economics of Charity: Evidence from a Field Experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2):747–782.

  49. Lange, A. and Stocking, A. (2012). The Complementarities of Competition in Charitable Fundraising.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Lewis, R. A. and Reiley, D. H. (2014). Online ads and offline sales: Measuring the effect of retail advertising via a controlled experiment on Yahoo! Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 12(3):235–266.

  51. Lewis, R. A., Rao, J. M., and Reiley, D. H. (2015). Measuring the Effects of Advertising: the digital frontier. In Goldfarb, A., Greenstein, S. M., and Tucker, C. E., editors, Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy, number April, pages 191–218.

  52. Meer, J. (2017). Does fundraising create new giving? Journal of Public Economics, 145:82–93.

  53. Meier, S. (2007). Do Subsidies Increase Charitable Giving in the Long Run? Matching Donations in a Field Experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(6):1203–1222.

  54. Metzger, L. and Günther, I. (2019). Making an impact? The relevance of information on aid effectiveness for charitable giving. A laboratory experiment. Journal of Development Economics, 136:18–33.

  55. Müller, S. and Rau, H. A. (2019). Too cold for warm glow? Christmas-season effects in charitable giving. PLoS ONE, 14(5):1–13.

  56. Null, C. (2011). Warm glow, information, and inefficient charitable giving. Journal of Public Economics, 95(5-6):455–465.

  57. Petrova, M., Perez-Truglia, R., Simonov, A., and Yildirim, P. (2019). Are Political and Charitable Giving Substitutes? Evidence from the United States. SSRN Electronic Journal.

  58. Reinstein, D. (2011). Does One Charitable Contribution Come at the Expense of Another? The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 11(1).

  59. Reinstein, D. (2012). Substitution Among Charitable Contributions: An Experimental Study.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1982). Charitable Giving and ”Excessive” Fundraising. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97(2):193–212.

  61. Scharf, K., Smith, S., and Ottoni-Wilhelm, M. (2017). Lift and Shift: The Effect of Fundraising Interventions in Charity Space and Time.

  62. Schelling, T. C. (1968). The life you save may be your own. In Problems in Public Expenditure Analysis, pages 127–176.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Small, D. A., Loewenstein, G., and Slovic, P. (2007). Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2):143–153.

  64. Thaler, R. (1985). Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science, 4(3):199–214.

  65. Yörük, B. K. (2009). How responsive are charitable donors to requests to give? Journal of Public Economics, 93(9-10):1111–1117.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Yörük, B. K. (2016). Charity Ratings. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 25(1):195–219.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Which Firms Gain from Digital Advertising? Evidence from a Field Experiment. (2023). Dai, Weijia ; Luca, Michael.
    In: Harvard Business School Working Papers.
    RePEc:hbs:wpaper:17-025.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Combining Observational and Experimental Data to Improve Efficiency Using Imperfect Instruments. (2023). Gui, George.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2010.05117.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Optimal Experimental Design for Staggered Rollouts. (2023). Imbens, Guido ; Athey, Susan ; Xiong, Ruoxuan ; Bayati, Mohsen.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1911.03764.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Does online fundraising increase charitable giving? A nationwide field experiment on Facebook. (2022). Adena, Maja ; Hager, Anselm.
    In: Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbeoc:spii2020302r.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. COVID-19 and pro-sociality: How do donors respond to local pandemic severity, increased salience, and media coverage?. (2022). Adena, Maja ; Harke, Julian.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:25:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10683-022-09753-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. How do big gifts affect rival charities and their donors?. (2021). Mayo, Jennifer.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:191:y:2021:i:c:p:575-597.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Does online fundraising increase charitable giving? A nation-wide field experiment on Facebook. (2020). Adena, Maja ; Hager, Anselm.
    In: Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbeoc:spii2020302.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. APPROXIMATING PURCHASE PROPENSITIES AND RESERVATION PRICES FROM BROAD CONSUMER TRACKING. (2020). Shiller, Benjamin.
    In: International Economic Review.
    RePEc:wly:iecrev:v:61:y:2020:i:2:p:847-870.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Multilevel marketing: optimizing marketing effectiveness for high-involvement goods in the automotive industry. (2020). Niemand, Thomas ; Mather, Sophia ; Kraus, Sascha ; Cuenca-Ballester, Antonio C.
    In: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal.
    RePEc:spr:intemj:v:16:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s11365-020-00669-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Public and Private Provision of Information in Market-Based Public Programs: Evidence from Advertising in Health Insurance Marketplaces. (2020). Kim, You Suk ; Aizawa, Naoki.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27695.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Displaying things in common to encourage friendship formation: A large randomized field experiment. (2020). Sun, Tianshu ; Taylor, Sean J.
    In: Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME).
    RePEc:kap:qmktec:v:18:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11129-020-09224-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Advertising in Health Insurance Markets. (2020). Shapiro, Bradley T.
    In: Marketing Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:39:y:2020:i:3:p:587-611.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Umbrella branding in pharmaceutical markets. (2020). Suppliet, Moritz.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:73:y:2020:i:c:s0167629619303856.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Digital platforms: developments in their regulation and challenges in the financial arena. (2020). Gorjon, Sergio.
    In: Economic Bulletin.
    RePEc:bde:journl:y:2020:i:12:d:aa:n:33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. How Much Ad Viewability is Enough? The Effect of Display Ad Viewability on Advertising Effectiveness. (2020). Miller, Klaus ; Nabout, Nadia Abou ; Uhl, Christina.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2008.12132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Inefficiencies in Digital Advertising Markets. (2020). Gordon, Brett ; Katona, Zsolt ; Narayanan, Sridhar ; Jerath, Kinshuk ; Wilbur, Kenneth C ; Shin, Jiwoong.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1912.09012.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. In pursuit of an effective B2B digital marketing strategy in an emerging market. (2019). Vieira, Valter Afonso ; Arunachalam, S ; Agnihotri, Raj ; de Arruda, Noga Simes ; Severo, Marcos Inacio.
    In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.
    RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:47:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s11747-019-00687-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Advertising and brand attitudes: Evidence from 575 brands over five years. (2019). Du, Rex Yuxing ; Joo, Mingyu ; Wilbur, Kenneth C.
    In: Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME).
    RePEc:kap:qmktec:v:17:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11129-018-9204-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Firms’ reactions to public information on business practices: The case of search advertising. (2019). Rao, Justin M ; Simonov, Andrey.
    In: Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME).
    RePEc:kap:qmktec:v:17:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11129-018-9203-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The next wave of digital technological change and the cultural industries. (2019). Peukert, Christian.
    In: Journal of Cultural Economics.
    RePEc:kap:jculte:v:43:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10824-018-9336-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Test & Roll: Profit-Maximizing A/B Tests. (2019). Feit, Elea ; Berman, Ron.
    In: Marketing Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:38:y:2019:i:6:p:1038-1058.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Measuring the Impact of Product Placement with Brand-Related Social Media Conversations and Website Traffic. (2019). Schweidel, David A ; Fossen, Beth L.
    In: Marketing Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:38:y:2019:i:3:p:481-499.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Social TV, Advertising, and Sales: Are Social Shows Good for Advertisers?. (2019). Schweidel, David A ; Fossen, Beth L.
    In: Marketing Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:38:y:2019:i:2:p:274-295.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Prices versus nudges: What matters for search versus purchase of energy investments?. (2019). Price, Michael ; Novgorodsky, David ; Holladay, J ; Lariviere, Jacob.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:172:y:2019:i:c:p:151-173.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Direct-to-consumer advertising and online search. (2019). Chesnes, Matthew ; Jin, Ginger Zhe.
    In: Information Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:iepoli:v:46:y:2019:i:c:p:1-22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Advertising as a Reminder : Evidence from the Dutch State Lottery. (2018). Klein, Tobias ; He, Chen.
    In: Other publications TiSEM.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutis:6a9d1dc7-8fb6-48a1-b954-87e63d4bf7c7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Essays on the role and effects of advertising. (2018). He, Chen.
    In: Other publications TiSEM.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutis:47a3272a-54f1-4a90-9714-ccd47c0235e0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Advertising as a Reminder : Evidence from the Dutch State Lottery. (2018). Klein, Tobias ; He, Chen.
    In: Other publications TiSEM.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutis:0791692c-433c-4e8d-8374-ac46a1269ef7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Advertising as a Reminder : Evidence from the Dutch State Lottery. (2018). Klein, Tobias ; He, Chen.
    In: Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutil:6a9d1dc7-8fb6-48a1-b954-87e63d4bf7c7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Advertising as a Reminder : Evidence from the Dutch State Lottery. (2018). Klein, Tobias ; He, Chen.
    In: Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:tiu:tiucen:0791692c-433c-4e8d-8374-ac46a1269ef7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. The Effects of Banning Advertising in Junk Food Markets. (2018). O'Connell, Martin ; Griffith, Rachel ; Dubois, Pierre ; Oconnell, Martin.
    In: The Review of Economic Studies.
    RePEc:oup:restud:v:85:y:2018:i:1:p:396-436..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. The Impact of Machine Learning on Economics. (2018). Athey, Susan.
    In: NBER Chapters.
    RePEc:nbr:nberch:14009.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The impact of data access regimes on artificial intelligence and machine learning. (2018). Martens, Bertin.
    In: JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy.
    RePEc:ipt:decwpa:201809.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Beyond the Last Touch: Attribution in Online Advertising. (2018). Berman, Ron.
    In: Marketing Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:37:y:2018:i:5:p:771-792.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Personalization in Email Marketing: The Role of Noninformative Advertising Content. (2018). Chintagunta, Pradeep ; Sahni, Navdeep S ; Wheeler, Christian S.
    In: Marketing Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:37:y:2018:i:2:p:236-258.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Super Bowl Ads. (2018). Hartmann, Wesley R ; Klapper, Daniel.
    In: Marketing Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:37:y:2018:i:1:p:78-96.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Advertising as a reminder: Evidence from the Dutch State Lottery. (2018). Klein, Tobias.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:12948.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Advertising as a Reminder: Evidence from the Dutch State Lottery. (2018). Klein, Tobias ; He, Chen.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7080.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Advertising and Brand Attitudes: Evidence from 575 Brands over Five Years. (2018). Du, Rex Yuxing ; Joo, Mingyu ; Wilbur, Kenneth C.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1810.07783.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. The impact of advertising along the conversion funnel. (2017). Seiler, Stephan ; Yao, Song.
    In: Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME).
    RePEc:kap:qmktec:v:15:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s11129-017-9184-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Measuring Multichannel Advertising Response. (2017). Bradlow, Eric T ; Feit, Eleanor Mcdonnell ; Zantedeschi, Daniel.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:63:y:2017:i:8:p:2706-2728.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Does Online Word of Mouth Increase Demand? (And How?) Evidence from a Natural Experiment. (2017). Wang, Wenbo ; Seiler, Stephan ; Yao, Song.
    In: Marketing Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:36:y:2017:i:6:p:838-861.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. When Less Is More: Data and Power in Advertising Experiments. (2017). Lewis, Randall A ; Johnson, Garrett A ; Reiley, David H.
    In: Marketing Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:36:y:2017:i:1:p:43-53.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Consumer Mistakes and Advertising : The Case of Mortgage Refinancing. (2017). Kim, You Suk ; Grundl, Serafin J.
    In: Finance and Economics Discussion Series.
    RePEc:fip:fedgfe:2017-67.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Vitamin panacea: Is advertising fueling demand for products with uncertain scientific benefit?. (2017). Avery, Rosemary J ; Eisenberg, Matthew D ; Cantor, Jonathan H.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:55:y:2017:i:c:p:30-44.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. What is the Causal Impact of Knowledge on Preferences in Stated Preference Studies?. (2016). Needham, Katherine ; LaRiviere, Jacob ; Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Simpson, Katherine.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2016-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. What is the Causal Impact of Knowledge on Preferences in Stated Preference Studies?. (2016). Hanley, Nick ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj.
    In: Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics.
    RePEc:sss:wpaper:2016-09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Asymmetric Effects of Non-Pecuniary Signals on Search and Purchase Behavior for Energy-Efficient Durable Goods. (2016). Price, Michael ; Novgorodsky, David ; LaRiviere, Jacob ; Holladay, J.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:22939.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. A New Method of Measuring Online Media Advertising Effectiveness: Prospective Meta-Analysis in Marketing. (2016). Tucker, Catherine ; Stremersch, Stefan ; dellaert, benedict ; Bart, Y ; Urban, G L ; Liberali, G.
    In: ERIM Report Series Research in Management.
    RePEc:ems:eureri:93279.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Can Business Owners Form Accurate Counterfactuals? Eliciting Treatment and Control Beliefs about Their Outcomes in the Alternative Treatment Status. (2016). McKenzie, David.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:11280.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  51. Display advertising’s competitive spillovers to consumer search. (2015). Lewis, Randall ; Nguyen, Dan.
    In: Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME).
    RePEc:kap:qmktec:v:13:y:2015:i:2:p:93-115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  52. Display advertising’s competitive spillovers to consumer search. (2015). Lewis, Randall ; Nguyen, Dan.
    In: Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME).
    RePEc:kap:qmktec:v:13:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s11129-015-9155-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  53. Multilevel marketing: optimizing marketing effectiveness for high-involvement goods in the automotive industry. (). Niemand, Thomas ; Mather, Sophia ; Kraus, Sascha ; Cuenca-Ballester, Antonio C.
    In: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal.
    RePEc:spr:intemj:v::y::i::d:10.1007_s11365-020-00669-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  54. Too much cocited documents. This list is not complete

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-24 07:44:31 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.