Lexemo

Excited to share that 𝗲! is a top 5 AI application, helping businesses access the digital AI-powered future! See how we're making a difference: https://bit.ly/3JBspso #proud #AI #innovation #Legaltech #automation 

We’re thrilled to announce our new collaboration with LAWLIFT! 💥 🤝 By combining LAWLIFT’s award-winning document automation with Lexemo’s AI-powered data extraction, we empower law firms, legal departments, and compliance teams to work more efficiently and error-free, no coding required. This collaboration marks a milestone for both teams, delivering real added value to legal professionals and LAWLIFT users alike. We’re excited to share how these innovations will simplify workflows and enhance everyday productivity for our clients! #LegalTech #AI #Partnership

LexisNexis's research about AI transforming legal teams into strategic enablers has shown that: - 76% report time savings, - 55% see accuracy improvements, - 38% reduction of outside counsel costs. But here's what the data actually reveals when you dig deeper: The transformation isn't about saying "yes" more often. It's about saying "yes, and here's how we make this work" instead of just "no, too risky." Most legal departments aren't becoming the "Department of Yes" because they're using AI. They're using AI because they were already trying to become strategic partners and AI finally gives them the bandwidth to do it. The real insight from the LexisNexis study isn't the technology—it's that 60% of teams are using AI for legal research and 48% for document drafting. These aren't revolutionary use cases. They're the boring, time-consuming tasks that kept lawyers from having strategic conversations in the first place. What actually changes the dynamic: → Legal teams can finally respond to business requests within hours instead of days → Contract reviews happen fast enough to participate in deal strategy, not just risk mitigation → Research gets done thoroughly without burning through the week's budget The "Department of Yes" concept works when legal has capacity for nuanced thinking about business opportunities instead of just managing the backlog. But let's not oversell this. AI doesn't magically turn legal departments into business strategists. It just removes some barriers that were preventing strategic thinking from happening. The teams becoming true business partners were already relationship-focused, business-curious, and proactive. AI just amplifies those qualities by freeing up mental bandwidth. Have you noticed AI changing how your legal team engages with business strategy, or is it mostly just making routine work faster?

Künstliche Intelligenz als Beschleuniger für Rechtsvereinfachung und #Bürokratieabbau 👩💻 💨 Eine neue Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums der Finanzen zeigt, wie #KI dazu beitragen kann, Rechtsunsicherheiten zu verringern und bürokratische Hürden für Unternehmen abzubauen. Doppelungen und Inkonsistenzen in Regelungen bremsen Innovationen, besonders in stark regulierten Bereichen. Die »Machbarkeitsstudie zu einer KI-gestützten Anwendung zur Identifikation des Vereinfachungspotentials von Regelungen« hebt hervor, dass geeignete Rahmenbedingungen notwendig sind, um das Potenzial von KI voll auszuschöpfen. 👉 Dabei sind drei Punkte von entscheidender Bedeutung: 1️⃣ Juristische Wissensbasis: Eine umfassende, aktuelle Datenbasis der geltenden Regelungen ist entscheidend. 2️⃣ Geeigneter methodischer Ansatz: Kombination mehrerer KI-Verfahren ist nötig, um Vereinfachungspotenziale erfolgreich zu identifizieren. 3️⃣ Verlässlichkeit der Ergebnisse: Automatisierte Validierungsschritte und manuelle Überprüfungen garantieren hohe Analysequalität. Die Aufgabe unserer Forscherinnen Katharina Beckh, Katrin Klug und Shalaka S. war es im Rahmen der Studie die Einsatzmöglichkeiten von KI für die Vereinfachung von Regelungen zu beurteilen, die Verlässlichkeit von KI-Verfahren zu bewerten und mögliche KI-Pipelines zu entwickeln. 💡 Dabei galt es eine hohe Verlässlichkeit der KI-Anwendungen zu gewährlisten. Insbesondere die Bewertungsdimensionen Plausibilität, Vollständigkeit, Konsistenz, Robustheit und Erklärbarkeit sind in diesem Kontext von besonderer Bedeutung. Um Halluzinationen zu reduzieren und rechtlich korrekte Vergleiche zu gewährleisten, ist daher eine Kombination mehrerer KI-Verfahren erforderlich, die die Verlässlichkeit der Ergebnisse sicherstellt. So kann #KünstlicheIntelligenz langfristig nicht nur den Bürokratieabbau unterstützen, sondern auch den manuellen Aufwand bei der Gesetzgebung erheblich reduzieren. 🔗Mehr dazu: https://lnkd.in/edUnPuHp Diese interdisziplinäre Studie wurde von d-fine in Zusammenarbeit mit A&O Shearman, Fraunhofer IAIS, Lexemo und Prof. Dr. Florian Möslein (Philipps-Universität Marburg) erstellt.

To be honest: Ich habe am Anfang auch nicht so richtig durchgeblickt. 👀 Workflows, Agentic Workflows, AI Agents… alles das Gleiche, oder? Aktuell schwirren diese Begriffe als Buzzwords auch in der Rechtsbranche herum. Die letzten Monate mit Lexemo haben mir natürlich enorm geholfen, Ordnung in diesen Begriffe-Dschungel zu bringen (danke für deine Geduld, Pascal Di Prima 😂 ). 🐒 Mein Aha-Moment kam tatsächlich damit, den Unterschied nicht nur in der Theorie zu benennen, sondern in Action in Lexemo's Software e! zu sehen. 💡 👉 Genau deshalb spreche ich gemeinsam mit Pascal im Webinar am 30. September um 12 Uhr darüber, wie man die Unterschiede sauber trennt, wie das ganze in unserem Tool aussieht und vor allem: Welchen echten Nutzen ihr für eure Kanzlei oder eure Rechtsabteilung daraus ziehen könnt. 📅 Live-Webinar 🔗 Anmeldung unter: https://lnkd.in/e87DRcKe Wir freuen uns auf euch!

Everyone's talking about the SRA research showing small firms struggle with tech adoption. But we're reading the same data and seeing something completely different. While BigLaw throws millions at every shiny new platform, small firms are asking the right questions: 🧐 → "Will this actually serve my clients better?" → "Is this built to last, or just venture capital theater?" → "Does this solve real problems or create new ones?" That "barrier" of 72% being concerned about futureproofing? That's not fear. That's intelligence. Small firms have watched legal tech companies burn through funding, pivot constantly, and abandon products that lawyers actually relied on. They've seen colleagues invest in platforms that promised the world and delivered expensive headaches. So when only 4% say they face "no barriers" to adoption, that's not paralysis. It's pattern recognition. Here's what the research actually proves: Small firms are the most sophisticated technology buyers in legal. They can't afford mistakes. Every purchase has to deliver ROI. Every platform has to actually work. Let the big firms be the beta testers. Let them work out the compliance issues and workflow bugs. The 14% AI adoption rate among small firms isn't lagging behind - it's exactly where smart money should be right now. 😎 Meanwhile, small firms are quietly building sustainable practices that don't depend on the latest tech trend. They're focusing on what actually matters: serving clients well, building relationships, and creating businesses that last. Small firms aren't struggling to catch up to some imaginary tech standard. They're setting a higher one. What do you think? Is being "cautious" about tech actually the competitive advantage here?

Fabricated legal citations - Bar referrals - Fines larger than you’d expect. 🤯 AI is rewriting the rules in legal practice, but not always for the better. Did you know hallucinated legal content appears in nearly 60% of AI-generated output? What’s driving this surge, and what does it mean if you rely on AI in your work? Dive into a real legal crisis and see why the story is just beginning...

Think AI legal citations are just a harmless shortcut? Think again ℹ️ In 2025 alone, over 200 documented cases involved completely fabricated legal precedents, and courts are handing down penalties of $10,000 or more. 💸 💸 💸 ⚡ The risks? They’re much bigger than most lawyers realize. Want to know how judges are responding and what you must do to protect your practice? Read our latest blog post: https://lnkd.in/ebkCkZqm

We're witnessing the biggest shift in legal technology since the internet arrived. While most firms are still figuring out basic AI tools, agentic AI is quietly transforming how the smartest legal teams work. These aren't your typical chatbots or document reviewers—they're autonomous AI agents that actually think, collaborate, and execute complex legal workflows independently. The numbers tell the story: 📈 79% of organizations already use AI agents in some capacity 📈 96% plan to expand their use in the next 12 months 📈 40% of enterprise workflows will be powered by autonomous agents by 2026 But here's what caught my attention: SMBs are leading this revolution, not the big law firms you'd expect. AI agent adoption varies significantly by organization size, with SMBs leading adoption at 65% Think about it! A small legal team can now deploy AI agents that: → Review contracts across multiple jurisdictions simultaneously → Flag compliance risks before they become problems → Draft complex agreements that adapt to specific deal contexts → Coordinate due diligence across time zones automatically The competitive advantage isn't going to the firms with the biggest budgets anymore. It's going to those who understand that legal work is evolving from individual tasks to orchestrated workflows, where AI agents handle the heavy lifting while lawyers focus on strategy and relationships. The question isn't whether agentic AI will reshape legal practice. It's whether you'll be leading that change or reacting to it. What's your take? Are you seeing autonomous AI making an impact in your legal work, or is this still too early to tell?

Proud to be part of this journey, collaborating with LAWLIFT! It’s a great showcase of how e! by lexemo seamlessly integrates with partner tools, making legal processes even more efficient. 🚀