Skip to content

[fix] Fix missing fields in xqa kernel cache key #6282

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 1, 2025

Conversation

lowsfer
Copy link
Member

@lowsfer lowsfer commented Jul 23, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced runtime configuration to optionally account for position embedding type, improving flexibility in certain scenarios.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved uniqueness and accuracy of runtime hash keys for better handling of model variations.
  • Refactor

    • Updated internal logic to support the new optional parameter without affecting existing workflows.

@lowsfer lowsfer requested review from a team as code owners July 23, 2025 07:01
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 23, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes extend the XQAKernelRuntimeHashKey struct by adding an optional position_embedding_type field. Associated equality and hash functions are updated accordingly. The construction of this hash key is modified in all relevant places, including JIT and precompiled kernel implementations, to include the new optional field and adjust related parameters.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
Core common implementation
cpp/tensorrt_llm/kernels/decoderMaskedMultiheadAttention/decoderXQAImplCommon.cpp
Modified getRuntimeHashKeyFromXQAParams to conditionally include position_embedding_type in the returned struct.
Core common header
cpp/tensorrt_llm/kernels/decoderMaskedMultiheadAttention/decoderXQAImplCommon.h
Added optional position_embedding_type to XQAKernelRuntimeHashKey, updated equality operator and hash calculation.
JIT kernel implementation
cpp/tensorrt_llm/kernels/decoderMaskedMultiheadAttention/decoderXQAImplJIT/decoderXQAImplJIT.cpp
Updated getRuntimeHashKeyFromKernelMeta to add the new optional field and modify is_fp8_output parameter type in hash key construction.
Precompiled kernel implementation
cpp/tensorrt_llm/kernels/decoderMaskedMultiheadAttention/decoderXQAImplPrecompiled.cpp
Updated XQAKernelRuntimeHashKey construction in two locations to append std::nullopt for the new optional field and replace 0 with false for is_fp8_output.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant XQAParams
    participant HashKeyBuilder
    participant HashTable

    Caller->>HashKeyBuilder: getRuntimeHashKeyFromXQAParams(xqaParams, isXqaJit)
    HashKeyBuilder->>XQAParams: Access parameters
    alt isXqaJit == true
        HashKeyBuilder->>HashKeyBuilder: Set position_embedding_type = xqaParams.position_embedding_type
    else
        HashKeyBuilder->>HashKeyBuilder: Set position_embedding_type = nullopt
    end
    HashKeyBuilder->>HashTable: Use hash key (with optional position_embedding_type)
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • lucifer1004
  • kaiyux

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2144ecd and 3be47f8.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • cpp/tensorrt_llm/kernels/decoderMaskedMultiheadAttention/decoderXQAImplCommon.cpp (1 hunks)
  • cpp/tensorrt_llm/kernels/decoderMaskedMultiheadAttention/decoderXQAImplCommon.h (2 hunks)
  • cpp/tensorrt_llm/kernels/decoderMaskedMultiheadAttention/decoderXQAImplJIT/decoderXQAImplJIT.cpp (1 hunks)
  • cpp/tensorrt_llm/kernels/decoderMaskedMultiheadAttention/decoderXQAImplPrecompiled.cpp (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • cpp/tensorrt_llm/kernels/decoderMaskedMultiheadAttention/decoderXQAImplJIT/decoderXQAImplJIT.cpp
  • cpp/tensorrt_llm/kernels/decoderMaskedMultiheadAttention/decoderXQAImplPrecompiled.cpp
  • cpp/tensorrt_llm/kernels/decoderMaskedMultiheadAttention/decoderXQAImplCommon.h
  • cpp/tensorrt_llm/kernels/decoderMaskedMultiheadAttention/decoderXQAImplCommon.cpp
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Pre-commit Check
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@lowsfer lowsfer changed the base branch from main to release/0.21 July 23, 2025 07:01
@lowsfer lowsfer requested a review from a team as a code owner July 23, 2025 07:01
@lowsfer lowsfer changed the base branch from release/0.21 to main July 23, 2025 07:32
@lowsfer
Copy link
Member Author

lowsfer commented Jul 23, 2025

/bot run

@NVIDIA NVIDIA deleted a comment from tensorrt-cicd Jul 23, 2025
@NVIDIA NVIDIA deleted a comment from tensorrt-cicd Jul 23, 2025
@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #12672 [ run ] triggered by Bot

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #12673 [ run ] triggered by Bot

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #12672 [ run ] completed with state ABORTED

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #12673 [ run ] completed with state SUCCESS
/LLM/main/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #9424 completed with status: 'FAILURE'

@lowsfer
Copy link
Member Author

lowsfer commented Jul 25, 2025

/bot run

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #12932 [ run ] triggered by Bot

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #12932 [ run ] completed with state SUCCESS
/LLM/main/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #9642 completed with status: 'FAILURE'

Signed-off-by: Yao Yao <lowsfer@users.noreply.github.com>
@lowsfer
Copy link
Member Author

lowsfer commented Jul 28, 2025

/bot run

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #13160 [ run ] triggered by Bot

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #13160 [ run ] completed with state SUCCESS
/LLM/main/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #9854 completed with status: 'FAILURE'

@symphonylyh symphonylyh requested a review from jhaotingc July 29, 2025 01:41
@lowsfer
Copy link
Member Author

lowsfer commented Jul 29, 2025

/bot run

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #13288 [ run ] triggered by Bot

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #13288 [ run ] completed with state SUCCESS
/LLM/main/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #9926 completed with status: 'FAILURE'

@lowsfer
Copy link
Member Author

lowsfer commented Jul 31, 2025

/bot run

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #13640 [ run ] triggered by Bot

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #13640 [ run ] completed with state SUCCESS
/LLM/main/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #10235 completed with status: 'SUCCESS'

@lowsfer lowsfer merged commit 942e080 into NVIDIA:main Aug 1, 2025
3 checks passed
lancelly pushed a commit to lancelly/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2025
Signed-off-by: Yao Yao <lowsfer@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Lanyu Liao <lancelly@users.noreply.github.com>
jain-ria pushed a commit to jain-ria/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2025
Signed-off-by: Yao Yao <lowsfer@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants