Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think GP's point is that academics who have 20+ papers are basically running a paper mill; there is no way they are participating meaningfully in the papers their names appear in


But they don't say, so how can we tell? I'm not going to be vague with my comment: best thing to do in this sort of case is not to engage.


The person says some of what I think much better than me:

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2025/02/17/do...

I am afraid that there is massive and systematic and harmful fraud in research: https://www.science.org/content/article/potential-fabricatio... as only one example. There are many many others. Very little work in entire fields is actually valid.

I think that the way that authorship is currently practiced has a lot to do with this fraud. Academics with ethics and goodwill can no longer effectively police the system. A large number of academics do not even want the system to be policed.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: