A agree with your first line but the rest sounds like a similar argument to the ridiculous damages video game companies used to claim due to piracy when most of those pirates never would have bought the game in the first place.
Ultimately the root issue is that copyright is inherently flawed because it tries to increase available useful information by restricting availability. We'd be better off by not pretending that information is scarce and looking for alternative to fund its creation.
Ultimately the root issue is that copyright is inherently flawed because it tries to increase available useful information by restricting availability. We'd be better off by not pretending that information is scarce and looking for alternative to fund its creation.