The person operating the LLM is not a meaningfully teachable human when they're not disclosing that they're using an LLM.

IF they disclose what they've done, provided the prompts, etc. then other contributors can help them get better results from the tools. But the feedback is very different than the feedback you'd give a human that actually wrote the code in question, that latter feedback is unlikely to be of much value (and even less likely to persist).