🔍 New research reveals a troubling gap in conservation funding.
Researchers have published a vital examination of funding across 14,566 conservation projects spanning a 25-year period – which shows how biased conservation funding is failing to effectively protect biodiversity.
The study found that most conservation funding goes to a narrow set of well-known species – often not the ones most at risk.
These large, charismatic species receive a disproportionate share, while entire groups – like amphibians, insects, fungi, and plants – remain critically underfunded.
This isn’t to say that iconic species should receive less funding.
Of course, all conservation efforts are valuable and needed, but the research is clear: as the world enters its sixth mass extinction period, we need to address the lack of funding for the most neglected species.
To reverse biodiversity loss, we need to shift support toward the overlooked, yet highly threatened, species that play vital roles in ecosystems.
Conservation funding needs to step up.
And more holistic distribution of that funding is urgently needed.
Reference: Guénard, B., Hughes, A. C., Lainé, C., Cannicci, S., Russell, B. D., & Williams, G. A. (2025). "Limited and biased global conservation funding means most threatened species remain unsupported." PNAS, 122(9), e2412479122.
Big thanks to researchers from The University of Hong Kong - Benoit Guénard, Alice Hughes, Claudianne Laine, Ph.D, Stefano Cannicci, Bayden Russell & Gray Williams. And to Sam Inglis MSc for helping to share this important work!
#Research #ConservationFunding #Biodiversity