Defining the "messy middle" in private equity.

View profile for Brandon Sedloff

CRE + Private Markets | Helping GPs unlock operational alpha | Host of The Distribution podcast | Advisor to real estate and tech start up's.

I talk a lot about the "messy middle" but what is the definition? This was something that was asked of me many times this past week. I have realized that there is no one right answer but I was also surprised by what I learned/heard at REEL this week. Several founders of sub $1B AUM businesses think they are in the messy middle but when I talk about it here, in my head it's GP's with between $5b-$60B of AUM that I am referring to. Here is the thing. There is not one "right" definition. It's not specifically bound by AUM or any other metric but there are a few common characteristics that firms face when they are in the messy middle. A few of the characteristics that I believe make up the messy middle: - Mission creep. Operational overhead drives business strategy - Inability to make decisions quickly due to org size/structure - Generalist vs. specialist when it comes to asset strategy - Lack of consensus by internal leaders re: direction of the firm - Inability to define your differentiation - Operations create a drag on business operations vs. generate Alpha What does the messy middle mean to you in CRE?

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories