Pricing an outcome without a method leads to variation. Use a method statement for like-for-like comparisons.

Pricing an outcome without first agreeing on method is how variation creeps in. The method is the control system for the claim. It defines causation boundaries, safe work sequence, temporary works and access, and how reinstatement will meet the NCC and relevant Australian Standards. When every tenderer prices the same method, you get like-for-like comparisons, fewer disputes at delivery, and a scope that reads the same way the site will be built. If you are tightening your instruction pack, use a method statement as the backbone and make assumptions and exclusions explicit up front. For practical scope structure and inclusions, visit:https://ow.ly/VcKk50WOvc6 #Strata #LossAdjusting #Engineering

  • No alternative text description for this image

This is such a clear and practical breakdown of why method statements are so important. I really like how you’ve tied it back to reducing disputes and ensuring consistency across tenders. Valuable insight for anyone working in construction or consultancy.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories