One important lesson I’ve learnt in my QA journey is that quality isn’t just about functionality. Early on, I used to focus only on whether features worked as expected. But along the way, I discovered the hard truth: if the design feels broken or inconsistent, the product won’t feel complete — even if all functionalities are correct. That’s where design snagging comes in. From alignment issues, spacing inconsistencies, and responsiveness glitches to visual mismatches with design systems — these are all part of the QA responsibility. A product that “works” but looks off still affects user trust. A product that both works and looks right delivers real quality. Quality Assurance isn’t just about testing functionality; it’s about ensuring a seamless experience. #QualityAssurance #SoftwareTesting #UIUX #LessonsLearned
Design snagging: A crucial part of QA
More Relevant Posts
-
As a tester, every click, every scenario, and every edge case matters. Testing is the bridge between an idea and a reliable product. UIUX.STUDIO What excites me the most is: ✅ Thinking like an end-user and breaking the flow where no one expects. ✅ Ensuring that every feature doesn’t just “work” but works consistently. ✅ Helping the team ship quality with confidence, not guesswork. Being part of a testing journey means being the voice of quality in every sprint — because a feature isn’t done until it’s tested. #SoftwareTesting #QualityAssurance #TestAutomation #ManualTesting #QA
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
💡 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗧𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴: 𝗦𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗥𝗲𝗹𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗻𝘁 & 𝗣𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗳𝘂𝗹 Manual testing remains a vital part of software quality assurance—especially for projects with strong UX/UI focus and complex user scenarios. ✨ Key Benefits • Real user perspective • High flexibility & adaptability 🚀 Opportunities • Handle complex user journeys • Quick launch with low short-term cost ⚠️ Challenges • Human errors & inconsistencies • Time-consuming and expensive for large projects 🔎 Where It Shines Exploratory, ad-hoc, usability, functional testing with frequent changes, low-volume regression, and hotfix testing. Despite automation growth, manual testing ensures the human touch—critical for great user experience. #SoftwareTesting #ManualTesting #QualityAssurance #UX #QA #Testing
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Quality isn’t just about catching defects—it’s about designing for trust. That’s why I see Design Thinking as a game-changer in QA. It shifts us from checklists to empathy, from “Does this work?” to “Does this solve the right problem?” When QA adopts Design Thinking, we stop being gatekeepers and become co-creators of experiences. The result? Fewer defects, faster delivery, and products that truly delight users. Don’t just test the product—design for the user. #DesignThinking #QualityAssurance
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Manual Testing remains a vital part of quality assurance, especially for small projects with fewer tests and a strong focus on user experience (UX/UI) and complex user scenarios. ✅ Benefits - Provides a deep user perspective - Offers flexibility and adaptability 🚀 Additional Opportunities - Handling complex user journeys - Quick launch capability - Low costs in the short run ⚠️ Weaknesses - Some tests can hardly be accomplished manually - Prone to human errors and inconsistency - Tedious and expensive for large projects 🔍 Common Use Cases - Exploratory testing - Ad hoc testing - Usability testing - Functional testing with frequent changes - Low-volume regression testing - Hotfix testing Understanding where manual testing excels helps us deliver better software quality by applying the right testing methods at the right time. #ManualTesting #SoftwareTesting #QualityAssurance #QA #UserExperience #TestingLifeCycle #AgileTesting #BugTracking #SoftwareQuality #TestAutomation #SoftwareDevelopment #TechCareers #SoftwareEngineer #SoftwareTester #TestingTips #UXUI #SoftwareTestingLifeCycle #STLC
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚀 From Code to Clicks: Why User Perspective is the Real Debugger 👩💻👨💻 As QAs, we often catch issues that aren’t in the code — but in the experience. A button may work perfectly ✅ … but does it guide the user naturally? 🤔 That’s where user perspective becomes our strongest tool. 🎯 Why QAs Must Hunt UX Issues: -Users don’t log bugs, they just leave. -Business loses credibility before analytics even detect customer drop-off. -QA ensures clarity of action + confidence of result. 🔐 Example 1: Auto-Login vs Autofill — A Subtle UX Trap Imagine: A user updates their password ✅ …but forgets to update it in their password manager ❌ ❌ Auto-login immediately → login fails repeatedly → user confusion ✅ Wait for user confirmation → they notice the wrong password, correct it, and log in smoothly Platforms like Gmail, Facebook, and LinkedIn follow this approach — users need control to build trust. 📶 Example 2: Network Drop During Payment — Trust Killer You buy something online → network drops for 2 seconds during checkout. ❌ Bad UX: System retries silently → charges user twice ✅ Smart UX: Show a clear “Payment not confirmed, retry?” message This small decision can mean the difference between a happy repeat customer or support nightmares + lost trust. ✨ Takeways: Seemingly small UX decisions can mean the difference between: ✔️ A smooth, trust-building experience ❌ Or frustration, failed attempts, and support tickets As,we’re the last line of defense between confusion and confidence,we should think like users in messy real life, shining a light on subtle pitfalls that impact experience and trust. #QA #Testing #UserExperience
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
✅ Why Manual Testing Still Matters in 2025 With automation everywhere, many ask: “Is manual testing dead?” Answer → NO ❌ ✔ Exploratory & Usability Testing – Needs human judgment. ✔ Rapidly Changing Requirements – Automation would break too often. ✔ UI/UX Testing – Users care about experience, not just pass/fail. ✔ One-Time or Ad-hoc Scenarios – Faster manually. ✔ Critical Thinking – A human mind finds bugs that scripts cannot. 💡 Pro Tip: Automation increases speed, but manual testing ensures quality + user satisfaction. Both are essential! 🚀 Do you think automation can ever fully replace manual testing? #ManualTesting #QA #AutomationVsManual
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Manual testing is the foundation of quality. Automation is the accelerator of speed. Both are essential, but knowing when to use which makes the real difference. ✅ Manual → Exploratory, UI/UX, Ad-hoc ✅ Automation → Regression, Repeated tasks, Large test suites. Balance is the key.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
💡 Testing is not just about finding bugs — it’s about preventing them. In today’s fast-paced development cycle, the role of a tester goes far beyond clicking buttons or reporting defects. A good tester: 🔹 Thinks like a developer — understanding the logic, code flow, and possible weaknesses in implementation. 🔹 Thinks like a user — focusing on usability, experience, and real-world scenarios that developers may not imagine. When testers combine both perspectives, they don’t just detect issues after they happen — they help prevent defects before they ever reach production. 👉 This mindset shift makes quality a shared responsibility, not a last-minute checkbox. 👉 Quality isn’t something you “add” at the end — it’s something you build into every step of the software lifecycle. ✨ That’s why collaboration between devs, testers, and product teams is so important — because in the end, testing is about delivering trust to the user. #SoftwareTesting #QualityAssurance #ShiftLeft #TestAutomation #QA UIUX.STUDIO
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In accessibility, QA is often seen as the “last line of defense.” However, the truth is that QA’s role extends far beyond simply catching defects. ✅ They can spot accessibility gaps that automation misses ✅ They prevent accessibility debt from piling up ✅ They safeguard inclusion and product trust at scale In my latest blog, I share how QA teams can move beyond the obvious checks and become true guardians of inclusion, shaping products that work for all users. #Accessibility #WebAccessibility #InclusiveDesign #DigitalAccessibility #AccessibilityTesting #QA #QualityAssurance #InclusiveDevelopment #TechForGood #ProductQuality #DigitalInclusion #ProductManagement #PMLeadership #Leadership #UXDesign #ProductStrategy #AgileLeadership #FutureOfWork #Innovation #AccessibilityMatters #A11Y #AccessibilityAwareness #InclusiveTech #AccessibleWeb #DeveloperCommunity #UserExperience #UX #AssistiveTechnology
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
QA: The Indispensable Bridge Between Teams Quality Assurance is often seen as the final step before release, but its true power lies in being the central, dynamic bridge that connects the entire product team. By operating at the intersection of ideation, design, and execution, the QA field translates visions into tangible, high-quality experiences. Here's how this collaborative role unfolds: With Product Managers: The connection goes beyond a simple checklist of requirements. QA provides the first real-world feedback on how a feature behaves in a live environment. We identify logical gaps and points of user friction that aren't visible on paper, helping to answer the critical question: "Does this feature feel right and truly solve the user's problem?" With UI/UX Designers: Our focus is on the living, breathing application, not just the static mockup. QA is crucial for ensuring that the intended design is implemented consistently across a vast landscape of devices and screen sizes. We validate the visual polish, intuitive navigation, and adherence to accessibility standards, ensuring the app is not only beautiful but usable for everyone. With Developers: The collaboration here is built on clear, constructive, and detailed feedback. The goal is to be a problem-solving partner. A great bug report isn't an accusation; it's a reproducible roadmap with logs and context that helps pinpoint the issue faster. This transforms the debugging process from a solitary task into a shared, collaborative effort. Ultimately, this constant communication fosters a culture of shared quality. When QA acts as a successful bridge, quality is no longer a siloed responsibility but a collective mindset embraced by the entire team. We aren't just gatekeepers at the end of the line; we are facilitators of excellence, woven into every stage of the development lifecycle. How does your team foster strong collaboration between QA and other departments? #QualityAssurance #Teamwork #Collaboration #Agile #SoftwareDevelopment #ProductManagement #UX #TechInPakistan
To view or add a comment, sign in
-