The speed of AI in healthcare is nothing short of amazing. From LLMs automating documentation to predictive models triaging care, innovation is charging ahead. But here’s the catch: the infrastructure to govern it is still dragging its feet.
This article from Daniel Vreeman highlights that standards aren’t “nice extras” anymore. They’re as essential as roads are to cars. Without shared frameworks for how AI is built, validated, monitored and explained, we risk a patchwork system full of black boxes and unequal care.
Key takeaways:
AI governance isn’t optional. We need consistency on safety, versioning, bias tracking, and it needs to be baked into systems.
Smaller hospitals and rural clinics can’t be afterthoughts. If we don’t help them adopt trustworthy AI, the tech divide grows.
There are models to follow. TEFCA shows us what alignment of policy + standards + private-sector participation looks like. Let’s build on that.
👥 Call to action: Providers, payers, vendors & regulators: let’s stop treating governance like a “nice to have” and treat it like the public utility it truly is. Because without it, trust erodes even as reach expands.
#aiHealthcare #LastMileInteroperability
💡 If it’s customer data, I know how to make it cleaner, faster, and more valuable.
5dOracle’s AI push in healthcare feels like a shot across the bow turning admin bottlenecks like prior auth and claims into competitive advantages. If this works, it’s not just “tech for tech’s sake,” it’s a shift toward truly patient-centric, value-based care.