Negative Outcome from Skill Assessment: What It Means and What You Can Do Next

Receiving a negative outcome from your skill assessment can feel disheartening, especially when you’ve invested significant time, effort, and resources into your migration journey. As someone who has helped many engineers and IT professionals navigate the skill assessment process, I want to assure you—this setback does not mean the end of the road.

In this article, we’ll explore:

• What a negative outcome really means
• Common reasons for refusal
• Your options moving forward
• Tips to strengthen your next application

✅ What Is a Skill Assessment?

A skill assessment is a process used by assessing bodies like Engineers Australia (EA), Australian Computer Society (ACS), VETASSESS, and others to determine if your educational qualifications and work experience meet Australian standards for your nominated occupation.

A positive assessment allows you to proceed with your visa application (e.g., subclass 189, 190, or 491), while a negative assessment means your current qualifications and/or experience don’t meet the criteria.

⚠️ Common Reasons for a Negative Outcome

Each assessing authority has unique requirements, but some of the most common reasons include:

• Insufficient documentation (e.g., missing reference letters, lack of detail in employment evidence)
• Irrelevant qualifications or studies not matching the nominated occupation
• Inadequate work experience (e.g., not enough years, mismatch with duties in ANZSCO)
• Non-accredited education (for example, degrees not from Washington Accord countries or not recognized by EA)
• Incorrect pathway selection (e.g., applying under CDR pathway when the Qualification pathway was more appropriate)

💡 What You Can Do Next

A negative outcome doesn’t close your case—it opens a new opportunity to refine your approach. Here's what you can do:

1. Review the Assessment Report Carefully

The assessment letter usually outlines the exact reasons for rejection. Understanding these is crucial.

2. Seek Professional Advice

It’s highly recommended to consult a migration agent or someone experienced with the assessing body’s expectations. They can help you interpret the feedback and suggest the right course.

3. Request a Review or Appeal

Most assessing bodies allow you to request a review or internal appeal within a specific timeframe usually 28 to 60 days. This is ideal if you believe the decision was based on incorrect or overlooked information.

4. Gather Better Documentation

If the issue was with your documents, work references, or CDR, revise and resubmit with more detailed, verifiable evidence.

5. Consider Changing the Pathway or Occupation

Sometimes, it’s a matter of adjusting your application to better match your real qualifications and experience. For instance:

• ICT professionals may switch between ACS pathways (RPL vs post-qualification experience)
• Engineers may consider a different ANZSCO code or CDR revision

🛠️ How to Strengthen Your Future Application

• Ensure your employment references are detailed, on company letterhead, and signed.
• Match your job duties explicitly with those listed under your ANZSCO code.
• For CDR reports (Engineers Australia), focus on specific engineering contributions, not just project overviews.
• Provide certified translations if documents are not in English.
• Use a professional checklist before submission—or better yet, get your documents reviewed by an expert.

Final Thoughts

A negative outcome is not a failure it’s feedback. Many of my clients who initially received rejections later obtained positive skill assessments and successfully applied for skilled migration after revising their applications with better documentation or guidance.

Don’t lose hope. Understand the gaps, fix them, and keep moving forward.

Need help with your skill assessment or planning a review? Feel free to reach out to me. I’d be happy to support you on your migration journey.

For more information - Contact/𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁𝘀𝗔𝗽𝗽 :+𝟔𝟏 𝟒𝟖𝟖 𝟖𝟒𝟕 𝟐𝟔𝟕, 𝗘𝗠𝗔𝗜𝗟: 𝐠𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐚@𝐜𝐝𝐫𝐰𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐚.𝐜𝐨𝐦