The Resurgence in Public Market SaaS Valuations
In February, public SaaS companies had fallen 57% from their highs. The enterprise value to forward revenue more than halved from 7.7x to 3.3x. This ostensibly random valuation correction has triggered a flurry of consolidation in software, with nearly $70B+ worth of exits year to date in 2016. Over the last six months, however, forward multiples have reverted to the mean.
After touching a low of 3.3x forward in February, forward multiples have appreciated by 6% for each of the last six months. Overall, SaaS companies now trade at 4.7x forward, which is quite nearly the median for the last two years of 5.2x.
In other words, we’re back to a “normal” valuation environment. I say “normal” because there is no right way to value SaaS companies; it’s just what the market will bear.
The top quartile companies have rebounded the fastest, nearly doubling their forward multiples. That’s not surprising given these companies are growing fastest, have the most attractive margin profiles and none suffered material changes in their business’ over the past six months.
All of these vacillations of the public market seem to have impacted valuations in Series D and later rounds, but haven’t pressured early stage valuations downwards. The early stage market, bolstered by near record amounts of venture capital fundraising, remain insulated.
Depressed multiples have triggered consolidation and though we’ve seen some appreciation in public SaaS forward multiples over the past six months, I suspect the wave of consolidation continues because prices remain rational, and even below historical norms.
Trung tâm sơn xe máy chất lượng cao TPHCM
8yhihi
Investor - Entrepreneur - Economist
8yI'm glad valuations are progressively less inflated but heavy VC funding in early stage market is exactly what is causing market vacillations on series D and later stages
Great analysis Tomasz Tunguz. For the top quartile of companies that have double dare forward multiples, is there a common theme amongst them? Are they for example all in a certain type of SaaS application, like CRM instead of ERP? My theory is that those SaaS applications that are quicker to deploy, with minimal customization or integration required, will grow the fastest. Such SaaS applications tend to be more front-office instead of back-office applications, and also tend to cater more towards the SMB segment where integration and customization requirements are extremely minimal.