When Your Investment Starts Competing With You: The Rapido x Swiggy Dilemma

When Your Investment Starts Competing With You: The Rapido x Swiggy Dilemma

𝑾𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒉𝒂𝒑𝒑𝒆𝒏𝒔 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒏 𝒂 “𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒈𝒊𝒄” 𝒃𝒆𝒕 𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒏𝒔 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒐 𝒂 𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒈𝒊𝒄 𝒕𝒉𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒕?

In 2022, Swiggy invested ~$120 million for a ~12% stake in Rapido - India’s bike-taxi and hyperlocal logistics startup.

At the time, it looked like a smart hedge:

• Expand into last-mile logistics

• Ride India’s two-wheeler economy

• Diversify beyond food delivery

But fast forward to 2025, and that very investment is under review.

Why? Because Rapido is no longer just a “partner.” It’s quietly becoming a 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒆𝒕𝒊𝒕𝒐𝒓.

𝑰𝒇 𝑹𝒂𝒑𝒊𝒅𝒐 𝑾𝒊𝒏𝒔 𝑺𝒄𝒂𝒍𝒆, 𝑺𝒘𝒊𝒈𝒈𝒚 𝑭𝒂𝒄𝒆𝒔 4 𝑩𝒊𝒈 𝑹𝒊𝒔𝒌𝒔:

1. 𝑹𝒂𝒑𝒊𝒅𝒐 𝒊𝒔 𝒔𝒄𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒖𝒑 𝒅𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚 𝒍𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒔: Their “Rapido Store” and “Rapido Local” offerings now directly overlap with Swiggy Genie and Instamart’s delivery backbone.

2. 𝑪𝒖𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒓 𝑪𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒊𝒃𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒛𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏: Users may start using Rapido for low-ticket deliveries, leaving Swiggy stuck with high CAC and lower density per pin code.

3. 𝑴𝒂𝒓𝒈𝒊𝒏 𝑪𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏: More competition in same-hour delivery shrinks margins further in an already thin-margin category.

4. 𝑺𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒈𝒊𝒄 𝑴𝒊𝒔𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕: Any attempt by Swiggy to build similar services now risks competing with its own investee - a classic conflict of interest.

𝑾𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒂𝒓𝒆 T𝒉𝒆 𝑶𝒑𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝑺𝒘𝒊𝒈𝒈𝒚:

1. 𝑫𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕 & 𝑫𝒐𝒖𝒃𝒍𝒆-𝑫𝒐𝒘𝒏 𝑬𝒍𝒔𝒆𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆

Sell the 12% stake to unlock ₹1,020 crore of capital, then reinvest aggressively in:

• Dark Stores & Cloud Kitchens for unit-economics improvement

• Tech-Driven Logistics to shorten delivery times and boost margins

• Loyalty & Subscription to insulate revenue streams

2. 𝑪𝒂𝒓𝒗𝒆 𝑶𝒖𝒕 𝒂 𝑱𝑽 𝑼𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒓 𝒂 𝑼𝒏𝒊𝒇𝒊𝒆𝒅 𝑴𝒐𝒃𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝑩𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒓

Form a 50:50 joint venture merging Rapido’s bike-taxi network with Swiggy’s delivery arm

• Synergies: Shared tech, shared riders, shared customers

• Brand Reinvention: A new “SwiggyRide” app for hyper-local fulfilment

• Risk Mitigation: Minority dilution balanced by governance safeguards

3. “𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒔𝒄𝒊𝒐𝒖𝒔 𝑼𝒏𝒄𝒐𝒖𝒑𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒈” 𝑺𝒑𝒊𝒏-𝑶𝒇𝒇

Spin off Rapido into an independent entity under strict non-compete and IP-licensing pacts:

• Preserve Upside: Retain a 10-15% “free float” stake to benefit from future growth

• Tax Efficiency: Navigate tax-free spin-off provisions

• Defensive Moat: Enforce a food-delivery carve-out clause preventing Rapido entry for 3-5 years


𝑾𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝑴𝒐𝒔𝒕 𝑷𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆 𝑫𝒐𝒏’𝒕 𝑲𝒏𝒐𝒘:

◘ Rapido already 𝒅𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒖𝒓𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒔 𝒅𝒊𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒍𝒚, bypassing aggregators.

◘ In Tier 2 cities, Rapido drivers 𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒏 𝒎𝒐𝒓𝒆 𝒐𝒏 𝒍𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒔 𝒗𝒔. 𝒓𝒊𝒅𝒆-𝒉𝒂𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒈, making it attractive for scale.

◘ Many cloud kitchens now use 𝒎𝒖𝒍𝒕𝒊-𝒑𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎 𝒅𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚 𝒇𝒍𝒆𝒆𝒕𝒔 and Rapido is inching into that space - Swiggy’s core moat.

𝑺𝒐 𝑾𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝑺𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝑺𝒘𝒊𝒈𝒈𝒚 𝑫𝒐?

There’s no obvious answer but one thing is clear:

Strategic capital isn’t passive.

If you don’t shape it, it might reshape you.

And when a portfolio company becomes your peer, staying silent isn’t being patient - it’s being left behind.


What would you do if you were in Swiggy’s boardroom? Exit, merge, or double down?

𝑳𝒆𝒕’𝒔 𝒅𝒊𝒔𝒄𝒖𝒔𝒔!

Yogesh Jangid

SRCC | Valuation | Content Creator | Corporate Finance | Investment Banking | Financial Modeling | Brand Collaborations

1mo

This one really highlights the complexities of strategic investing. Backing innovation is great, until that innovation turns around and eats into your own market share. The Rapido vs Swiggy angle makes you wonder if allies today can become rivals tomorrow.

Khyati Mashru Vasani (Money Monk)

Helping People Build Wealth That Lasts | Chartered Wealth Manager | Founder Plantrich and Vama Plantrich | On a mission to rewrite 10,000 money stories.

1mo

The lines between collaborator and competitor are getting blurrier, especially in high-growth sectors. Curious to see how Swiggy navigates this one, Lovish.

Shubham kumar

NISM XV ASPIRANT II Junior Accountant At Aluco Panels Ltd. II Passionate About Research & Valuation II Financial Modelling II Commerce Graduate II

1mo

Definitely worth reading Lovish Anand Thanks for sharing Lovish Anand

Omkar Prasad

Empowering DIY Investors | MBA Finance | Equity Research & Insights | Simple, Honest Wealth Strategies | Financial Literacy Advocate

1mo

Swiggy’s $120M investment in Rapido is now a challenge as Rapido’s no-commission food delivery risks squeezing Swiggy’s margins—Swiggy must choose to cash out, merge or spin off to stay competitive.

Ishan Shah

MBA 26 | ACCA Level 1 Cleared | Finance Enthusiast

1mo

Such an interesting take. When your investment enters your core space, it forces you to innovate, differentiate, or collaborate. Swiggy x Rapido is a perfect example of how lines between partners and competitors can blur in a fast-moving market.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Others also viewed

Explore content categories