Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Quality
Risk Management
ICH Q9
Background
Disclaimer: This presentation includes the authors views on quality risk management theory and practice.
The presentation does not represent official guidance or policy of authorities or industry.
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 2
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Purpose of this part
 To provide information on
the background
of the ICH Q9 document
 Give an aid by providing some points of discussions
on the understanding of the quality risk management
concept
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 3
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Agenda
 The ICH process
 ICH Q9 and other ICH guidelines
 From “Risk” to “Quality Risk Management”
 Opportunities, Challenges and Benefit
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 4
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Agenda
 The ICH process
 ICH Q9 and other ICH guidelines
 From “Risk” to “Quality Risk Management”
 Opportunities, Challenges and Benefit
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 5
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
International Conference
on Harmonisation
of Technical
Requirements
for Registration of
Pharmaceuticals
for Human Use
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 6
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Expert Working
Groups (EWG)
EWG’s include observers and
constituted from both authorities & industry
Guidelines on
Quality
Chemical and
pharmaceutical QA
Safety
In vitro and in-vivo pre-
clinical studies
Efficacy
Clinical studies
in human subject
Multidisciplinary
General topics
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 7
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Agenda
 The ICH process
 ICH Q9 and other ICH guidelines
 From “Risk” to “Quality Risk Management”
 Opportunities, Challenges and Benefit
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 8
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
ICH Q-Documents
 Q1 Stability
 Q2 Analytical Validation
 Q3 Impurities
 Q4 Pharmacopoeias
 Q5 Quality of Biotechnological Products
 Q6 Specifications
 Q7 Good Manufacturing Practice
 Q8 Pharmaceutical Development
 Q9 Quality Risk Management
 Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality Systems
Different:
- not a recipe
- not a “SOP”
just a guidance
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 9
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
ICH Q9 Link back to patient risk
Process
Materials
Design
Manufacturing
Distribution
Patient
Facilities
Opportunities to impact
risk using quality risk
management
G.- Claycamp, FDA, June 2006
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 10
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk Management across the
Product lifecycle for drug (medicinal) products
Research
Preclinical
Phase
Clinical
Phases
Launch
Quality
ICH Q9
Safety
Efficacy
Manufacturing
& Distribution
GLP
GCP
GMP
GDP
End of
life cycle
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 11
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Source: basic model adapted from FDA (1999). Managing the Risks from Medical Product Use.
Managing the risk of drug
(medicinal) product use
Known Side Effects
Avoidable Unavoidable
Medication or Device
Error
Product Defects
Preventable
Adverse
Events
Injury or
Death
Unexpected
Consequences
Public Health
CONSIDERATIONS
ICH Q9
Safety
Efficacy Quality
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 12
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
New Regulatory Paradigm
 ICH Regulators:
> FDA: New paradigm with the 21st Century GMP initiative
> EMEA: Revised EU directives
> MHLW: Revised Japanese law (rPAL)
 EU & Japan became involved at ICH
GMP Workshop in July 2003: 5 year vision agreed:
“Develop a harmonised pharmaceutical quality system applicable
across the life cycle of the product emphasizing an integrated approach
to quality risk management and science”
 Consequent ICH Expert Working Groups (EWG):
> ICH Q8, on Pharmaceutical Development, doc. approved 2005
> ICH Q9, on Quality Risk Management, doc. approved 2005
> ICH Q10, on Quality Systems, topic accepted 2005
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 13
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
“risk-based”
concepts and
principles
The new paradigm
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 14
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Pharmaceutical Development (Q8)
Past: Data transfer / Variable output
Present: Knowledge transfer / Science
based / Consistent output
Pharmaceutical Quality Systems (Q10)
Past: GMP checklist
Future: Quality Systems across product
life cycle
Quality Risk Management (Q9)
Past: Used, however poorly defined
Present: Opportunity to use structured
process thinking
Incremental steps
Changed
Paradigm
Q9
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 15
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
How Q9 interacts with Q8 and Q10
Base: J. Ramsbotham, Solvay Pharm. NL / EFPIA
Risk
from
Manufacturing
site
Product / Process Risk
High
Low
High
Low
Using Q9
Quality Risk
Management
principles
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Q10
Pharm.
Quality
Systems
Q8 Pharmaceutical Development
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 16
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Q10
Q8
ICH Q9 Link back to patient risk
Process
Materials
Design
Manufacturing
Distribution
Patient
Facilities
Opportunities to impact
risk using quality risk
management
G.- Claycamp, FDA, June 2006
Q9
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 17
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
A Vision of the future becomes fact
Old Approach New Approach Remarks
Broad Concept
Quality decisions divorced
from science and risk
evaluation.
Adherence to filing
commitments.
Quality decisions and filing
committments based on
Process Understanding
and Risk Management.
Quality by Design.
Design Space concept
introduced to integrate
process knowledge with
regulatory evaluation.
Quality
Post-factum sampling and
quality testing.
Process Validation.
Management of variability
Process control focused on
critical attributes.
Continuous Quality
Verification.
Quality by design definition
applied. Measure critical
process parameters to control
output product quality.
Systems
Systems designed to inhibit
changes & minimize business
risks. Discourages
improvement & innovation.
Changes managed within
company's quality system.
Real time batch release
feasible.
Regulators and industry place
higher reliance / trust /
understanding on systems.
Multidisciplinary evaluation
and decision making.
Regulatory
Compliance focus.
Changes require prior
approval.
Regulatory scrutiny adjusted
to level of Process
Understanding. Continuous
improvement allowed
within Design Space.
Requires mechanisms to
communicate Process
Understanding data
("inspectable rather than
reviewable") .
Based on EFPIA, PAT Topic Group, 2005
CONSIDERATIONS
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 18
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Continuous
Improvement
Process
Understanding
Risk
CMC
regulatory
oversight
Company’s
Quality system
cGMP
regulatory
oversight
Continuous
Improvement
Process
Understanding
Risk
CMC
regulatory
oversight
Company’s
Quality system
cGMP
regulatory
oversight
Q8
&
Q9
Based on A.Hussain, FDA, September 2004
Q10
&
Q9
Process
Understanding
Risk
(P/R)
CMC
regulatory
oversight
Company’s
Quality system
cGMP
regulatory
oversight
Post
approval
change
Process
Understanding
Risk
(perceived & real)
CMC regulatory
Oversight
(Submission)
Company’s
Quality system
cGMP regulatory
oversight
(Inspection)
Post
Approval Change
(PAC)
PAC to
Continuous
Improvement
Process
Understanding
Risk
CMC
regulatory
oversight
Company’s
Quality system
cGMP
regulatory
oversight
PAC to
Continuous
Improvement
Process
Understanding
Risk
CMC regulatory
Oversight
(Submission)
Company’s
Quality system
cGMP regulatory
oversight
(Inspections)
CONSIDERATIONS
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 19
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Agenda
 The ICH process
 ICH Q9 and other ICH guidelines
 From “Risk” to “Quality Risk Management”
 Opportunities, Challenges and Benefit
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 20
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
ICH Q9
Quality Risk Management
What does it mean?
What is it worth?
Where does it lead?
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 21
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Managing risk is a behavior
“The investigation of risks
is at once
a scientific activity and
an expression of culture”
Kasperson, Renn, Slovic et al. (1988)
CONSIDERATIONS
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 22
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk Management as a discipline
provides multiple benefits
 Understand and influence the factors (hazards)
which impact regulators and industry business
 Create awareness and a culture
> Supports an effective pro-active behaviour
> Open factual dialogue
> Make decisions traceable and consistent
 Provide assurance
> Risks are adequately managed
> Compliance to external and internal requirements
 Recognise risks at a desired level
> Zero risk not possible
CONSIDERATIONS
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 23
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
?
The Hurdles
Increasing
external
requirements
for best practice,
transparency and
compliance
• Public / Community
• Governments
• Regulators
• Patients
• Investors / Creditors
Growing
complexity
and scope of risks
• Globalisation
“Multinational”
• Multi-factor approaches
• Regulatory expectations
• Acceptance of
risk and uncertainty
Increasing
efforts and costs
for sustainability
• Documentation
• Projects
• Systems
• Interfaces Based on D. Geller, Roche
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 24
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Quality
Risk
Management
Empowerment & Flexibility
Proactive
disclosure
build trust and
understanding
Improve
communication
through sharing best
practice and science
based knowledge
An appropriate integrated approach
helps to meet requirements more efficiently
Master complexity
Convert data into knowledge
e.g. by using methodology and tools
Based on D. Geller, Roche
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 25
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Different meaning of risk
 Individual
> Risk is a cognitive and emotional response to expected loss
 Technicians
> Risk is usually based on the expected value of the
conditional probability of the event occurring multiplied by
the consequences of the event given that it has occurred
 ICH Q9
> Combination of the probability of occurrence of harm and
the severity of that harm
CONSIDERATIONS
Based on G. Claycamp, FDA, September 2005
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 26
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Different meaning of risk
 Organizations might use many different meanings of risk
> Depending on the type of risk management program
 In general, "probability" and "severity" must be considered
> In a given program definitions will fine-tune the concepts
so that a risk management program can be created
and applied
> Make the detail in the definition fit the objective
of the program
 Accept the different "realities" among the stakeholders
> Harmonized guidance needs to focus concepts
into useful terms for the purpose (e.g. protection of patient [Q9])
CONSIDERATIONS
Based on G. Claycamp, FDA, September 2005
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 27
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Severity and Probability are simple concepts?
 Which consequence is more severe?
> 300 lives lost in single, fiery plane crash.
> 300 lives lost on US roads over a weekend.
> 300 lives potentially lost from cancer within the next 20 years
 Which probability is probable?
What does a “30% chance of rain tomorrow” mean?
> 30% of the days like tomorrow will have at least a trace of rain.
> 30% of the area will have rain tomorrow.
> 30% of the time tomorrow, it will rain. Gigerenzer, et. al (2005)
G. Claycamp, FDA, September 2005
CONSIDERATIONS
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 28
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
The “risk-based approach”
severity
probability
Parameters
for
evaluating risks
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 29
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Parameters for “calculating” risks
A picture of the life cycle
Probability Detectability Severity
past today future
Refers
to
time
Refers
to
Refers
to
= Risk Priority Number
x x
CONSIDERATIONS
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 30
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
(Dis)Advantage calculated numbers & data
 Numbers
> Does the “Risk Priority Number” tell the truth?
 Keep a robust data set for further evaluation!
> Is the data set comparable?
> Are the data plain and concise?
> What about trending and use of statistics
including extrapolation?
> What amount of data is enough?
e.g. start with the existing data set
CONSIDERATIONS
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 31
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Hazards in Quality Anything
that has the potential to
harm patients,
product quality or
the business
(loss, interruption, image)
CONSIDERATIONS
S. Rönninger, Roche, 2004
Potential threat
- chemical reaction
- manufacturing issues
- facilities and equipment
System defect
- not detected
- insufficiently prevented
- emerges by degree
Failure
- technical breakdown
- human breakdown
- extrinsic effect
hazard
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 32
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk and Uncertainty
Time 
Process
Parameter

Lower Specification Limit (LSL)
Upper Specification Limit (USL)
today
Uncertainty
RISK: For a given severity of risk event, what are the chances
(probability) of exceeding the USL in the next period of time?
G. Claycamp, FDA, Sept. 2005
CONSIDERATIONS
Tomorrow ?
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 33
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk and Uncertainty
Different Risk Management Control?
Time 
Process
Parameter

Lower Specification Limit (LSL)
Upper Specification Limit (USL)
today
Uncertainty
RISK: Control options are scenarios for risk management. Note
that this scenario shows the best estimate is below the USL.
G. Claycamp, FDA, Sept. 2005
CONSIDERATIONS
Tomorrow ?
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 34
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk and Uncertainty
Is the Risk of Exceeding USL = Zero?
Time 
Process
Parameter

Lower Specification Limit (LSL)
Upper Specification Limit (USL)
today
Uncertainty
Take a cut at a
moment in time:
Risk has a distribution.
G. Claycamp, FDA, Sept. 2005
CONSIDERATIONS
Tomorrow ?
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 35
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Uncertainty and Quality Risk Management
CONSIDERATIONS
Hazard
may
cause harm
Hazard
may not
cause harm
uncertainty
Hazard
is less likely to
cause harm
Manage risks
in relation to
probability &
severity
Lack of, or inadequate knowledge
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 36
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Definitions
Quality
Risk
Degree to which a set
of inherent properties
of a product, system or process
fulfills requirements
combination of the
probability of occurrence of harm and
the severity of that harm
Systematic process for the assessment,
control, communication and review
of risks to the quality of the
drug (medicinal) product
across the product lifecycle
Management
QRM
ICH Q9
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 37
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Has QRM already been implemented?
Yes, however we need to firm-up and
set the priorities in relation to risks
 We need to know…
> How good is our QRM compliance and decision making?
> To what extent QRM has to be implemented or formalised?
 An then focus efforts and communicate in order to…
> Avoid duplication of effort and to align initiatives
> Develop scope by using different viewpoints
e.g. from management, internal and external customers
CONSIDERATIONS
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 38
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk Management
Not a new concept
 ISO/IEC Guide 73: 2002 - Risk Management -
Vocabulary - Guidelines for use in Standards
 ISO/IEC Guide 51:1999 - Safety Aspects -
Guideline for their inclusion in standards
 WHO Technical Report Series No 908, 2003 Annex 7 Application
of Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP)
methodology to pharmaceuticals
 GAMP Good Practice Guide ISPE, 2005
A risk-based approach to compliant electronic records and
signatures
 ISO 14971:2000 - Application of Risk Management
to Medical Devices
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 39
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk Review
Risk
Communication
Risk Assessment
Risk Evaluation
unacceptable
Risk Control
Risk Analysis
Risk Reduction
Risk Identification
Review Events
Risk Acceptance
Initiate
Quality Risk Management Process
Output / Result of the
Quality Risk Management Process
Risk
Management
tools
ISO 14971 (medical devices) & ICH Q9
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 40
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
What is ICH Q9 about?
 The ICH Q9 document:
> Main body explains the “What?”
> Annex I give ideas on the “How?”
> Annex II give ideas on the “Where?”
 It can be implemented by industry and regulators
> Pharmaceutical development (ICH Q8) and Quality Systems
(ICH Q10) will facilitate the “What?”, “How?” and “Where?”
 “It helps prevent overly restrictive and unnecessary
requirements being imposed by either industry or
regulators” (ICH Q9)
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 41
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Why we have ICH Q9?
 To show how it can be applied by regulators and
industry to quality of pharmaceuticals (including API)
> We already do a lot of quality risk management
activities without identifying them as such
 To enable manufacturing and regulatory flexibility
 Provides the “What?” “How?” and “Where?” for
quality risk management
> Pharmaceutical development (ICH Q8) and Quality
Systems (ICH Q10) will facilitate the
“What?”, “How?” and “Where?”
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 42
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Quality Risk Management is NOT
 Hiding risks
 Writing half the truth (e.g. in an investigation report)
 A means of removing industry’s obligation to comply
with regulatory requirements
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 43
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Manage quality risks!
Quality management as function of time
Consequences
What if
disaster happens?
Nowadays
QRM
Based on Prof. M. Haller, University St. Gallen, Switzerland
Using QRM
Prior use of QRM may
lower the consequences
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 44
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Implementing ICH Q9 means
The weakest chain will no longer be a problem
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 45
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Agenda
 The ICH process
 ICH Q9 and other ICH guidelines
 From “Risk” to “Quality Risk Management”
 Opportunities, Challenges and Benefit
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 46
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Integrate QRM during product life cycle
Say, what you do
Do, what you say
Gain experience
Improve it
Approval
Manufacture
for market
Analyse root cause:
Continuous
improvement
Update
documentation
Quality Risk
Management
(QRM)
(Risk of) Failure ?
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 47
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk Management & Flexibility
 Definitions of “Compliance”:
> Conformity in fulfilling official requirements
> The act or process of complying to a
desire, demand, or proposal or to coercion
> A disposition to yield to others
> The ability of an object to yield elastically
when a force is applied: flexibility
 Definition of “Flexibility”:
> characterised by a ready capability
to adapt to new, different, or changing requirements
Source: www.webster.com, 01. Nov.04
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 48
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
QRM may help define acceptable quality levels
 Not every single detail can nor should be covered by
> Specifications (product quality)
> Documents (quality systems)
 Set priorities and allocate resources
according to the potential for protection of patients
Use
“science-based” and
“risk-based” behavior
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 49
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Opportunity for the Industry & Regulators
 Using the same guideline apply QRM to
> Industry (development, manufacture and distribution)
> Competent authorities (reviewer and inspectorate)
 Facilitates common approaches to quality risk
management in our every day jobs
 Supports science-based decision making
 Focus resources based on risks to patients
 Avoids restrictive and unnecessary requirements
 Facilitates communication and transparency
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 50
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Conclusions for ICH Q9
 Over all: Positive Contribution to patient protection
> Further develops Quality Risk Management awareness,
that is already part of industry and regulatory culture
 Ongoing change in behaviour
> Identifying risks can be positive
> A long list of identified risks that are assessed and
controlled provides high quality capability
 Awareness of quality risks
> “Risk-based approach”
> A potential of risks remains - No “Zero” risk!
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 51
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Way Forward for Industry and Regulators
 Improve communication and transparency
 Adapt existing
structures, organizations and systems
> Raise awareness of rationales for decision making
> Develop training on methods and tools, as appropriate
> Do not create new QRM organisations
> Do not create new requirements
 Adapt existing requirements using quality risk
management behaviors
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 52
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Opportunities & Benefits
 Encourages transparency
> Create baseline for more science-based decisions
 Facilitates communication
> Matrix team approach
> An aid to convince the stakeholders with trust
 Encourages a preventive approach
> Proactive control of risks and uncertainty
> Benefit of knowledge transfer by team approach
 Changes behavior
> Better understanding of risk-based decisions
> Acceptance of residual risks
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 53
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Remember
 The use of Quality Risk Management is not mandatory
However, if you don’t use it,
you will not gain the benefits
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 54
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Change in behaviour
Sharing information
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 55
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Change in behaviour
From tick-box
approach for compliance
towards
systematic
risk-based thinking
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 56
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Change in behaviour
Doing things,
that do not matter
for the patient
Background
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 57
ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT
Integration of QRM
into existing systems
and
regulatory processes
will take time, trust and
communication

More Related Content

PPT
Q9_Executive_Summary.ppt
PDF
QRM .pdf
PPT
Q9.ppt_Quality Risk Management Guideline
PPT
Q9_Content.ppt
PPT
Q9_History.ppt
PDF
Q9 content july 2006
PPT
Q9_Applications_-_overall_notes.ppt
PPT
Q9_Tools_-_overall_notes.ppt
Q9_Executive_Summary.ppt
QRM .pdf
Q9.ppt_Quality Risk Management Guideline
Q9_Content.ppt
Q9_History.ppt
Q9 content july 2006
Q9_Applications_-_overall_notes.ppt
Q9_Tools_-_overall_notes.ppt

Similar to Q9_Background.ppt (20)

PPT
Q9_Development.ppt
PDF
Ich q10
PPT
1978237935_WHOGMP_ICH.ppt
DOCX
16.G Quality by design (QbD).docx
PPTX
ICH - quality guidelines
PPTX
ICH QSEM Guidelines
PDF
Q8_Pharma_development_JL.Robert.pdf
PDF
Industry Implications of Pharmaceutical Quality ICH Guidelines
PPTX
PPTX
Ich quality guidelines
DOCX
Quản lý rủi ro chất lượng trong GMP EU
PPTX
ICH GUIDELINES Q and S(regulatory affairs).pptx
PPTX
Ich – quality guidelines
PPTX
ICH-Q7.pptx training PPT requirement for pharma industries training
PPSX
Quality management systems qms tqm
PDF
Quality Risk Management_ Integrated Quality Management .pdf
PDF
Closing Messages
PPT
Pharmaceutical-Quality-Systems-ICH-Q10-Concepts-Implementation.ppt
PPTX
ICH_Updated_Q8Q9Q10_Training_Materials_2024_0804_0.pptx
Q9_Development.ppt
Ich q10
1978237935_WHOGMP_ICH.ppt
16.G Quality by design (QbD).docx
ICH - quality guidelines
ICH QSEM Guidelines
Q8_Pharma_development_JL.Robert.pdf
Industry Implications of Pharmaceutical Quality ICH Guidelines
Ich quality guidelines
Quản lý rủi ro chất lượng trong GMP EU
ICH GUIDELINES Q and S(regulatory affairs).pptx
Ich – quality guidelines
ICH-Q7.pptx training PPT requirement for pharma industries training
Quality management systems qms tqm
Quality Risk Management_ Integrated Quality Management .pdf
Closing Messages
Pharmaceutical-Quality-Systems-ICH-Q10-Concepts-Implementation.ppt
ICH_Updated_Q8Q9Q10_Training_Materials_2024_0804_0.pptx
Ad

More from Rajakumari Rajendran (20)

PPTX
microbial spoilage. Pharmaceutical microbial Spoilage
PPTX
microbial spoilage. Pharmaceutical microbial Spoilage
PPTX
CONCEPT-OF-GENERICS-GENERIC-DRUG-PRODUCT-DEVELOPMENT-1 (1).pptx
PPT
New drug discovery different stages development
PPTX
Drug Discovery with example stage 1 Process
PPTX
Morphology, Classification and Cultivation of Virus
PPTX
Intrinsic Dissolution Date from Elsevier
PPTX
Cultivation of Anaerobic Bacteria Microb
PPTX
Pharmaceutical Drug Development Process.
PPTX
Morphology and ,,Classification of Fungi
PPT
Pharma Specification WHO Quality Worksho
PPTX
Audit Management Pharmaceutical Presentation
PPTX
Quantitative measurement of bacterial growth.pptx
PPTX
microbial spoilage; Pharmaceutical Microbial Spoilage
PPTX
History of microbiology; Pharmaceutical Microbiology
PPTX
Pharmaceutical Degradation; Degradants in the Product
PPTX
Dissolution Official Test Monograph Pharma
PPTX
viralsafetyevaluationofbiotechnologyproductsderivedfrom-210804180136.pptx
PPTX
History of microbiology , History and the scientific contributions
PPTX
History of Microbiology, History, Microbiology
microbial spoilage. Pharmaceutical microbial Spoilage
microbial spoilage. Pharmaceutical microbial Spoilage
CONCEPT-OF-GENERICS-GENERIC-DRUG-PRODUCT-DEVELOPMENT-1 (1).pptx
New drug discovery different stages development
Drug Discovery with example stage 1 Process
Morphology, Classification and Cultivation of Virus
Intrinsic Dissolution Date from Elsevier
Cultivation of Anaerobic Bacteria Microb
Pharmaceutical Drug Development Process.
Morphology and ,,Classification of Fungi
Pharma Specification WHO Quality Worksho
Audit Management Pharmaceutical Presentation
Quantitative measurement of bacterial growth.pptx
microbial spoilage; Pharmaceutical Microbial Spoilage
History of microbiology; Pharmaceutical Microbiology
Pharmaceutical Degradation; Degradants in the Product
Dissolution Official Test Monograph Pharma
viralsafetyevaluationofbiotechnologyproductsderivedfrom-210804180136.pptx
History of microbiology , History and the scientific contributions
History of Microbiology, History, Microbiology
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Carcinoma of the breastfgdvfgbddbdtr.pptx
PPTX
ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
PPTX
Routine care of newborn presentation .pptx
PDF
mycobacterial infection tuberculosis (TB)
PPTX
Full Slide Deck - SY CF Talk Adelaide 10June.pptx
PPTX
MEDICAL NURSING. Endocrine Disorder.pptx
PPT
DENGUE_FEVER_&_DHF.pptfffffffffhffffffffffff
PPTX
1. FAMILY PLANNING-1-2, nursing students
PPTX
Nepal health service act.pptx by Sunil Sharma
PPTX
Mortality rate in a teritiary care center of infia july stats sncu picu
PPTX
Acute renal failure.pptx for BNs 2nd year
PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 17
PPTX
A med nursing, GRP 4-SIKLE CELL DISEASE IN MEDICAL NURSING
PPTX
Wound care MNEMONICS MNEMONICS health care
PDF
demography and familyplanning-181222172149.pdf
PPTX
health promotion of infant.pptx for nursing students
PDF
Culturally Sensitive Health Solutions: Engineering Localized Practices (www....
PPTX
ACUTE CALCULAR CHOLECYSTITIS: A CASE STUDY
PPTX
case study of ischemic stroke for nursing
PPTX
Fever and skin rash - Approach.pptxBy Dr Gururaja R , Paediatrician. An usef...
Carcinoma of the breastfgdvfgbddbdtr.pptx
ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
Routine care of newborn presentation .pptx
mycobacterial infection tuberculosis (TB)
Full Slide Deck - SY CF Talk Adelaide 10June.pptx
MEDICAL NURSING. Endocrine Disorder.pptx
DENGUE_FEVER_&_DHF.pptfffffffffhffffffffffff
1. FAMILY PLANNING-1-2, nursing students
Nepal health service act.pptx by Sunil Sharma
Mortality rate in a teritiary care center of infia july stats sncu picu
Acute renal failure.pptx for BNs 2nd year
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 17
A med nursing, GRP 4-SIKLE CELL DISEASE IN MEDICAL NURSING
Wound care MNEMONICS MNEMONICS health care
demography and familyplanning-181222172149.pdf
health promotion of infant.pptx for nursing students
Culturally Sensitive Health Solutions: Engineering Localized Practices (www....
ACUTE CALCULAR CHOLECYSTITIS: A CASE STUDY
case study of ischemic stroke for nursing
Fever and skin rash - Approach.pptxBy Dr Gururaja R , Paediatrician. An usef...

Q9_Background.ppt

  • 1. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Quality Risk Management ICH Q9 Background Disclaimer: This presentation includes the authors views on quality risk management theory and practice. The presentation does not represent official guidance or policy of authorities or industry.
  • 2. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 2 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Purpose of this part  To provide information on the background of the ICH Q9 document  Give an aid by providing some points of discussions on the understanding of the quality risk management concept
  • 3. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 3 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Agenda  The ICH process  ICH Q9 and other ICH guidelines  From “Risk” to “Quality Risk Management”  Opportunities, Challenges and Benefit
  • 4. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 4 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Agenda  The ICH process  ICH Q9 and other ICH guidelines  From “Risk” to “Quality Risk Management”  Opportunities, Challenges and Benefit
  • 5. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 5 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use
  • 6. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 6 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Expert Working Groups (EWG) EWG’s include observers and constituted from both authorities & industry Guidelines on Quality Chemical and pharmaceutical QA Safety In vitro and in-vivo pre- clinical studies Efficacy Clinical studies in human subject Multidisciplinary General topics
  • 7. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 7 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Agenda  The ICH process  ICH Q9 and other ICH guidelines  From “Risk” to “Quality Risk Management”  Opportunities, Challenges and Benefit
  • 8. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 8 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT ICH Q-Documents  Q1 Stability  Q2 Analytical Validation  Q3 Impurities  Q4 Pharmacopoeias  Q5 Quality of Biotechnological Products  Q6 Specifications  Q7 Good Manufacturing Practice  Q8 Pharmaceutical Development  Q9 Quality Risk Management  Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality Systems Different: - not a recipe - not a “SOP” just a guidance
  • 9. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 9 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT ICH Q9 Link back to patient risk Process Materials Design Manufacturing Distribution Patient Facilities Opportunities to impact risk using quality risk management G.- Claycamp, FDA, June 2006
  • 10. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 10 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Risk Management across the Product lifecycle for drug (medicinal) products Research Preclinical Phase Clinical Phases Launch Quality ICH Q9 Safety Efficacy Manufacturing & Distribution GLP GCP GMP GDP End of life cycle
  • 11. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 11 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Source: basic model adapted from FDA (1999). Managing the Risks from Medical Product Use. Managing the risk of drug (medicinal) product use Known Side Effects Avoidable Unavoidable Medication or Device Error Product Defects Preventable Adverse Events Injury or Death Unexpected Consequences Public Health CONSIDERATIONS ICH Q9 Safety Efficacy Quality
  • 12. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 12 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT New Regulatory Paradigm  ICH Regulators: > FDA: New paradigm with the 21st Century GMP initiative > EMEA: Revised EU directives > MHLW: Revised Japanese law (rPAL)  EU & Japan became involved at ICH GMP Workshop in July 2003: 5 year vision agreed: “Develop a harmonised pharmaceutical quality system applicable across the life cycle of the product emphasizing an integrated approach to quality risk management and science”  Consequent ICH Expert Working Groups (EWG): > ICH Q8, on Pharmaceutical Development, doc. approved 2005 > ICH Q9, on Quality Risk Management, doc. approved 2005 > ICH Q10, on Quality Systems, topic accepted 2005
  • 13. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 13 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT “risk-based” concepts and principles The new paradigm
  • 14. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 14 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Pharmaceutical Development (Q8) Past: Data transfer / Variable output Present: Knowledge transfer / Science based / Consistent output Pharmaceutical Quality Systems (Q10) Past: GMP checklist Future: Quality Systems across product life cycle Quality Risk Management (Q9) Past: Used, however poorly defined Present: Opportunity to use structured process thinking Incremental steps Changed Paradigm Q9
  • 15. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 15 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT How Q9 interacts with Q8 and Q10 Base: J. Ramsbotham, Solvay Pharm. NL / EFPIA Risk from Manufacturing site Product / Process Risk High Low High Low Using Q9 Quality Risk Management principles c o n t i n u a l i m p r o v e m e n t Q10 Pharm. Quality Systems Q8 Pharmaceutical Development
  • 16. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 16 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Q10 Q8 ICH Q9 Link back to patient risk Process Materials Design Manufacturing Distribution Patient Facilities Opportunities to impact risk using quality risk management G.- Claycamp, FDA, June 2006 Q9
  • 17. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 17 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT A Vision of the future becomes fact Old Approach New Approach Remarks Broad Concept Quality decisions divorced from science and risk evaluation. Adherence to filing commitments. Quality decisions and filing committments based on Process Understanding and Risk Management. Quality by Design. Design Space concept introduced to integrate process knowledge with regulatory evaluation. Quality Post-factum sampling and quality testing. Process Validation. Management of variability Process control focused on critical attributes. Continuous Quality Verification. Quality by design definition applied. Measure critical process parameters to control output product quality. Systems Systems designed to inhibit changes & minimize business risks. Discourages improvement & innovation. Changes managed within company's quality system. Real time batch release feasible. Regulators and industry place higher reliance / trust / understanding on systems. Multidisciplinary evaluation and decision making. Regulatory Compliance focus. Changes require prior approval. Regulatory scrutiny adjusted to level of Process Understanding. Continuous improvement allowed within Design Space. Requires mechanisms to communicate Process Understanding data ("inspectable rather than reviewable") . Based on EFPIA, PAT Topic Group, 2005 CONSIDERATIONS
  • 18. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 18 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Continuous Improvement Process Understanding Risk CMC regulatory oversight Company’s Quality system cGMP regulatory oversight Continuous Improvement Process Understanding Risk CMC regulatory oversight Company’s Quality system cGMP regulatory oversight Q8 & Q9 Based on A.Hussain, FDA, September 2004 Q10 & Q9 Process Understanding Risk (P/R) CMC regulatory oversight Company’s Quality system cGMP regulatory oversight Post approval change Process Understanding Risk (perceived & real) CMC regulatory Oversight (Submission) Company’s Quality system cGMP regulatory oversight (Inspection) Post Approval Change (PAC) PAC to Continuous Improvement Process Understanding Risk CMC regulatory oversight Company’s Quality system cGMP regulatory oversight PAC to Continuous Improvement Process Understanding Risk CMC regulatory Oversight (Submission) Company’s Quality system cGMP regulatory oversight (Inspections) CONSIDERATIONS
  • 19. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 19 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Agenda  The ICH process  ICH Q9 and other ICH guidelines  From “Risk” to “Quality Risk Management”  Opportunities, Challenges and Benefit
  • 20. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 20 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT ICH Q9 Quality Risk Management What does it mean? What is it worth? Where does it lead?
  • 21. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 21 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Managing risk is a behavior “The investigation of risks is at once a scientific activity and an expression of culture” Kasperson, Renn, Slovic et al. (1988) CONSIDERATIONS
  • 22. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 22 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Risk Management as a discipline provides multiple benefits  Understand and influence the factors (hazards) which impact regulators and industry business  Create awareness and a culture > Supports an effective pro-active behaviour > Open factual dialogue > Make decisions traceable and consistent  Provide assurance > Risks are adequately managed > Compliance to external and internal requirements  Recognise risks at a desired level > Zero risk not possible CONSIDERATIONS
  • 23. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 23 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT ? The Hurdles Increasing external requirements for best practice, transparency and compliance • Public / Community • Governments • Regulators • Patients • Investors / Creditors Growing complexity and scope of risks • Globalisation “Multinational” • Multi-factor approaches • Regulatory expectations • Acceptance of risk and uncertainty Increasing efforts and costs for sustainability • Documentation • Projects • Systems • Interfaces Based on D. Geller, Roche
  • 24. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 24 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Quality Risk Management Empowerment & Flexibility Proactive disclosure build trust and understanding Improve communication through sharing best practice and science based knowledge An appropriate integrated approach helps to meet requirements more efficiently Master complexity Convert data into knowledge e.g. by using methodology and tools Based on D. Geller, Roche
  • 25. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 25 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Different meaning of risk  Individual > Risk is a cognitive and emotional response to expected loss  Technicians > Risk is usually based on the expected value of the conditional probability of the event occurring multiplied by the consequences of the event given that it has occurred  ICH Q9 > Combination of the probability of occurrence of harm and the severity of that harm CONSIDERATIONS Based on G. Claycamp, FDA, September 2005
  • 26. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 26 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Different meaning of risk  Organizations might use many different meanings of risk > Depending on the type of risk management program  In general, "probability" and "severity" must be considered > In a given program definitions will fine-tune the concepts so that a risk management program can be created and applied > Make the detail in the definition fit the objective of the program  Accept the different "realities" among the stakeholders > Harmonized guidance needs to focus concepts into useful terms for the purpose (e.g. protection of patient [Q9]) CONSIDERATIONS Based on G. Claycamp, FDA, September 2005
  • 27. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 27 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Severity and Probability are simple concepts?  Which consequence is more severe? > 300 lives lost in single, fiery plane crash. > 300 lives lost on US roads over a weekend. > 300 lives potentially lost from cancer within the next 20 years  Which probability is probable? What does a “30% chance of rain tomorrow” mean? > 30% of the days like tomorrow will have at least a trace of rain. > 30% of the area will have rain tomorrow. > 30% of the time tomorrow, it will rain. Gigerenzer, et. al (2005) G. Claycamp, FDA, September 2005 CONSIDERATIONS
  • 28. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 28 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT The “risk-based approach” severity probability Parameters for evaluating risks
  • 29. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 29 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Parameters for “calculating” risks A picture of the life cycle Probability Detectability Severity past today future Refers to time Refers to Refers to = Risk Priority Number x x CONSIDERATIONS
  • 30. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 30 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT (Dis)Advantage calculated numbers & data  Numbers > Does the “Risk Priority Number” tell the truth?  Keep a robust data set for further evaluation! > Is the data set comparable? > Are the data plain and concise? > What about trending and use of statistics including extrapolation? > What amount of data is enough? e.g. start with the existing data set CONSIDERATIONS
  • 31. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 31 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Hazards in Quality Anything that has the potential to harm patients, product quality or the business (loss, interruption, image) CONSIDERATIONS S. Rönninger, Roche, 2004 Potential threat - chemical reaction - manufacturing issues - facilities and equipment System defect - not detected - insufficiently prevented - emerges by degree Failure - technical breakdown - human breakdown - extrinsic effect hazard
  • 32. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 32 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Risk and Uncertainty Time  Process Parameter  Lower Specification Limit (LSL) Upper Specification Limit (USL) today Uncertainty RISK: For a given severity of risk event, what are the chances (probability) of exceeding the USL in the next period of time? G. Claycamp, FDA, Sept. 2005 CONSIDERATIONS Tomorrow ?
  • 33. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 33 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Risk and Uncertainty Different Risk Management Control? Time  Process Parameter  Lower Specification Limit (LSL) Upper Specification Limit (USL) today Uncertainty RISK: Control options are scenarios for risk management. Note that this scenario shows the best estimate is below the USL. G. Claycamp, FDA, Sept. 2005 CONSIDERATIONS Tomorrow ?
  • 34. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 34 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Risk and Uncertainty Is the Risk of Exceeding USL = Zero? Time  Process Parameter  Lower Specification Limit (LSL) Upper Specification Limit (USL) today Uncertainty Take a cut at a moment in time: Risk has a distribution. G. Claycamp, FDA, Sept. 2005 CONSIDERATIONS Tomorrow ?
  • 35. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 35 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Uncertainty and Quality Risk Management CONSIDERATIONS Hazard may cause harm Hazard may not cause harm uncertainty Hazard is less likely to cause harm Manage risks in relation to probability & severity Lack of, or inadequate knowledge
  • 36. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 36 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Definitions Quality Risk Degree to which a set of inherent properties of a product, system or process fulfills requirements combination of the probability of occurrence of harm and the severity of that harm Systematic process for the assessment, control, communication and review of risks to the quality of the drug (medicinal) product across the product lifecycle Management QRM ICH Q9
  • 37. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 37 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Has QRM already been implemented? Yes, however we need to firm-up and set the priorities in relation to risks  We need to know… > How good is our QRM compliance and decision making? > To what extent QRM has to be implemented or formalised?  An then focus efforts and communicate in order to… > Avoid duplication of effort and to align initiatives > Develop scope by using different viewpoints e.g. from management, internal and external customers CONSIDERATIONS
  • 38. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 38 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Risk Management Not a new concept  ISO/IEC Guide 73: 2002 - Risk Management - Vocabulary - Guidelines for use in Standards  ISO/IEC Guide 51:1999 - Safety Aspects - Guideline for their inclusion in standards  WHO Technical Report Series No 908, 2003 Annex 7 Application of Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) methodology to pharmaceuticals  GAMP Good Practice Guide ISPE, 2005 A risk-based approach to compliant electronic records and signatures  ISO 14971:2000 - Application of Risk Management to Medical Devices
  • 39. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 39 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Risk Review Risk Communication Risk Assessment Risk Evaluation unacceptable Risk Control Risk Analysis Risk Reduction Risk Identification Review Events Risk Acceptance Initiate Quality Risk Management Process Output / Result of the Quality Risk Management Process Risk Management tools ISO 14971 (medical devices) & ICH Q9
  • 40. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 40 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT What is ICH Q9 about?  The ICH Q9 document: > Main body explains the “What?” > Annex I give ideas on the “How?” > Annex II give ideas on the “Where?”  It can be implemented by industry and regulators > Pharmaceutical development (ICH Q8) and Quality Systems (ICH Q10) will facilitate the “What?”, “How?” and “Where?”  “It helps prevent overly restrictive and unnecessary requirements being imposed by either industry or regulators” (ICH Q9)
  • 41. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 41 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Why we have ICH Q9?  To show how it can be applied by regulators and industry to quality of pharmaceuticals (including API) > We already do a lot of quality risk management activities without identifying them as such  To enable manufacturing and regulatory flexibility  Provides the “What?” “How?” and “Where?” for quality risk management > Pharmaceutical development (ICH Q8) and Quality Systems (ICH Q10) will facilitate the “What?”, “How?” and “Where?”
  • 42. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 42 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Quality Risk Management is NOT  Hiding risks  Writing half the truth (e.g. in an investigation report)  A means of removing industry’s obligation to comply with regulatory requirements
  • 43. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 43 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Manage quality risks! Quality management as function of time Consequences What if disaster happens? Nowadays QRM Based on Prof. M. Haller, University St. Gallen, Switzerland Using QRM Prior use of QRM may lower the consequences
  • 44. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 44 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Implementing ICH Q9 means The weakest chain will no longer be a problem
  • 45. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 45 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Agenda  The ICH process  ICH Q9 and other ICH guidelines  From “Risk” to “Quality Risk Management”  Opportunities, Challenges and Benefit
  • 46. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 46 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Integrate QRM during product life cycle Say, what you do Do, what you say Gain experience Improve it Approval Manufacture for market Analyse root cause: Continuous improvement Update documentation Quality Risk Management (QRM) (Risk of) Failure ?
  • 47. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 47 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Risk Management & Flexibility  Definitions of “Compliance”: > Conformity in fulfilling official requirements > The act or process of complying to a desire, demand, or proposal or to coercion > A disposition to yield to others > The ability of an object to yield elastically when a force is applied: flexibility  Definition of “Flexibility”: > characterised by a ready capability to adapt to new, different, or changing requirements Source: www.webster.com, 01. Nov.04
  • 48. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 48 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT QRM may help define acceptable quality levels  Not every single detail can nor should be covered by > Specifications (product quality) > Documents (quality systems)  Set priorities and allocate resources according to the potential for protection of patients Use “science-based” and “risk-based” behavior
  • 49. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 49 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Opportunity for the Industry & Regulators  Using the same guideline apply QRM to > Industry (development, manufacture and distribution) > Competent authorities (reviewer and inspectorate)  Facilitates common approaches to quality risk management in our every day jobs  Supports science-based decision making  Focus resources based on risks to patients  Avoids restrictive and unnecessary requirements  Facilitates communication and transparency
  • 50. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 50 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Conclusions for ICH Q9  Over all: Positive Contribution to patient protection > Further develops Quality Risk Management awareness, that is already part of industry and regulatory culture  Ongoing change in behaviour > Identifying risks can be positive > A long list of identified risks that are assessed and controlled provides high quality capability  Awareness of quality risks > “Risk-based approach” > A potential of risks remains - No “Zero” risk!
  • 51. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 51 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Way Forward for Industry and Regulators  Improve communication and transparency  Adapt existing structures, organizations and systems > Raise awareness of rationales for decision making > Develop training on methods and tools, as appropriate > Do not create new QRM organisations > Do not create new requirements  Adapt existing requirements using quality risk management behaviors
  • 52. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 52 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Opportunities & Benefits  Encourages transparency > Create baseline for more science-based decisions  Facilitates communication > Matrix team approach > An aid to convince the stakeholders with trust  Encourages a preventive approach > Proactive control of risks and uncertainty > Benefit of knowledge transfer by team approach  Changes behavior > Better understanding of risk-based decisions > Acceptance of residual risks
  • 53. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 53 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Remember  The use of Quality Risk Management is not mandatory However, if you don’t use it, you will not gain the benefits
  • 54. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 54 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Change in behaviour Sharing information
  • 55. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 55 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Change in behaviour From tick-box approach for compliance towards systematic risk-based thinking
  • 56. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 56 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Change in behaviour Doing things, that do not matter for the patient
  • 57. Background prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 57 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Integration of QRM into existing systems and regulatory processes will take time, trust and communication