SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Best practices from Norway
Integration
http://arbere.eu/integration
Main differences
 No special schools but special education in
customised training schools. Transport
covered by the public. It is not the parents
who have to run and pick up their children.
 All students will go together in the same
group based on the year they were born.
Mentally and physically handicapped students
in a class with non-disabled students.
The same total number of teaching hours as
other pupils
 Physically handicapped students. The school
can not say that they can not accept students
in wheelchairs. Physical and psychological
environment in the school edified for all
students
 Pupils with a mother tongue other than
Norwegian have a lawful right to be educated
in what is native. Special language tuition to
improve in Norwegian.
 When was it first applied?
30 years ago
 Is it applied at all schools in the region or was it a
school initiative?
All schools
 Do students seem to like this practice?
Both disabled and non-disabled students seem to like
it equally
 Do teachers think that it is a good practice?
Yes, it helps all of us combat discrimination
 What are the benefits?
Integration, awareness, socialisation. Respect by non-
disabled students, being together.
 Easily, by using Parallel Support as Special
education in general schools.
 Teachers show special support and adjust
curriculum for students with special needs
 Deteriorate cognitive outcomes for students
with special needs (provision by state for
university entrance, other forms of
evaluation)
 When was it first applied?
30 years ago
 Is it applied at all schools in the region or was it a
school initiative?
All schools
 Do students seem to like this practice?
Yes, but especially parents because they are not
obliged to change their daily programme
 Do teachers think that it is a good practice?
Yes, because students get special attention by public
 What are the benefits?
Independence to the whole family, students feel there
is special provision for their problems, parents can
choose school irrespectively of distance
 High cost but shows social provision. Support
to family
 Help for parents who have to transfer their
child
Whether students with physical disabilities or not
 When was it first applied?
10 years ago
 Is it applied at all schools in the region or was it a
school initiative?
All schools
 Do students seem to like this practice?
Yes, they use them a lot
 Do teachers think that it is a good practice?
Yes, you are “in their shoes”. While simply changing
seat, it means much more
 What are the benefits?
Feeling how it is, understanding, sympathy, getting
used to diversity
 Low cost, used wheelchairs from hospitals
 Great innovation for typical Greek classrooms
 Indirect way to train students
 When was it first applied?
By education law, 20 years ago
 Is it applied at all schools in the region or was it a school
initiative?
All schools, by education law
 Do students seem to like this practice?
Yes, because school is adjusted to greater physical
environment
 Do teachers think that it is a good practice?
Yes, we have to take care for students with disabilities and
provide them with freedom in mobility while at school
 What are the benefits?
Social provision, show in practice respect for disabled,
adjusted to regulations
Potential transfer in Greek schools
 High cost, but only once
 Example since no facilities in greater physical
environment
 Indirect way to train students
Some history of special education in Norway :
In 1881 Norway got its first law governing special education . It
should by law be organized schools for the deaf, blind and
mentally retarded children.
In 1951 Norway got a special school law which required the state
to provide education for special needs groups in their own schools
. The weakest were considered not proficient training and was
therefore not covered by the law.
• In 1975 a special school law repealed. Also children under
school age were given the right to special assistance.
In 1987, it was emphasized that all children as far as possible
should be able to go to the school they geographically belongs.
Young people with special needs got in 1982 first right to admission to
secondary education. The same student group received in 1991 the
right to upper secondary education for more than three years , when
the expert assessment is made decisions about it. From 1994, when all
young people in Norway had a right to three years of secondary
education , got pupils with special education right to primarily chosen
course and the opportunity to receive up to five years of secondary
education.
"One can say that inclusion is achieved when the term has lost its
value - when all students receive instruction and training tailored
to their requirements along with all the other children . "
Thank you for your attention !

More Related Content

PDF
Stv iceland 031021_icelandic school system
PPT
Education in spain vs education in finland
PPTX
Education in Finland
PPTX
School system in italy
PPT
Uk basic education introduction
PDF
Education in Finland
PPTX
Education In Finland
PPT
British educational system
Stv iceland 031021_icelandic school system
Education in spain vs education in finland
Education in Finland
School system in italy
Uk basic education introduction
Education in Finland
Education In Finland
British educational system

What's hot (20)

PPT
Finnish school system
PPT
Education in Britain
DOCX
Education System of United kingdom
PPTX
Finnish education system
PPT
Education in britain
PDF
Educational Curriculum in Finland
PPT
Schooling in Great Britain
PPTX
1st year lecture 6 education in the UK
PPTX
Welsh Education System
PPTX
Curriculum in finland 29.9.2017 uppdaterad
PPTX
EDUCATION SYSTEM OF FINLAND ppt
PPTX
Education in finland
PPSX
Education in New Zealand
DOCX
Finland
PPT
Education in uk and usa
PPT
Education in UK
PPTX
National policy on education
PPTX
223 session sen in greece ok
PDF
Integration course development plan zervou
PPTX
Education system India vs Finland
Finnish school system
Education in Britain
Education System of United kingdom
Finnish education system
Education in britain
Educational Curriculum in Finland
Schooling in Great Britain
1st year lecture 6 education in the UK
Welsh Education System
Curriculum in finland 29.9.2017 uppdaterad
EDUCATION SYSTEM OF FINLAND ppt
Education in finland
Education in New Zealand
Finland
Education in uk and usa
Education in UK
National policy on education
223 session sen in greece ok
Integration course development plan zervou
Education system India vs Finland
Ad

Viewers also liked (19)

PPTX
PPTX
BEST PRACTICES School support system
PPT
Delinquency project
PPT
Integration
PPTX
BEST PRACTICES Delinquent behaviour
PPTX
School support system
PDF
The Yellow Pin Studio Profile
PPT
Hordaland county Educational challenges
PPTX
BEST PRACTICES General school rules
PDF
Conte rateta
PPT
Visit to bergen
PPS
Pablo Neruda
PPTX
Assessment Norway by Hordaland County
PPTX
School support system, police
PPTX
Hordaland county Dropout Ny GIV NORWAY
PPT
General school rules
PPTX
Best practices in GREECE
PPTX
Student delinquency GREECE vs NORWAY
PPTX
Greek education system
BEST PRACTICES School support system
Delinquency project
Integration
BEST PRACTICES Delinquent behaviour
School support system
The Yellow Pin Studio Profile
Hordaland county Educational challenges
BEST PRACTICES General school rules
Conte rateta
Visit to bergen
Pablo Neruda
Assessment Norway by Hordaland County
School support system, police
Hordaland county Dropout Ny GIV NORWAY
General school rules
Best practices in GREECE
Student delinquency GREECE vs NORWAY
Greek education system
Ad

Similar to BEST PRACTICES Integration (20)

PPTX
Inclusive education in greece
PDF
Inclusive edu.pdf
PPT
Inclusive-Learning-SEN.ppt SUPPORTING LEARNER NEEDS: An inclusive learning en...
PPTX
PPT
Youth with special needs ppt in eed 8 hdshsflh
PPT
Inclusive-Learning Strategies for children with SEN needs
PDF
International Experiences in Education and Inclusive Programs for Cerebral Pa...
PPTX
CSE 102 Report-Inclusive education PPT.pptx
PPT
Integrated education for communication disorders (1).ppt
PDF
seminarinclusive-180908161731.pdf
PPT
Integration class
DOCX
Eden oxford 2014
DOC
Introductio1 (1) aiswarya (4)
PPTX
Sir joseph presentation1
PPTX
lnclusive education in B.ed course presentation
PPT
Inclusion, The Individual And The Environment - Session One
PPT
Hellenic educational system in special needs area
PPTX
Building inclusive school culture tawheed parvaiz bhat
PPTX
Costumized learning1
PPTX
Educational system in singapore final revision
Inclusive education in greece
Inclusive edu.pdf
Inclusive-Learning-SEN.ppt SUPPORTING LEARNER NEEDS: An inclusive learning en...
Youth with special needs ppt in eed 8 hdshsflh
Inclusive-Learning Strategies for children with SEN needs
International Experiences in Education and Inclusive Programs for Cerebral Pa...
CSE 102 Report-Inclusive education PPT.pptx
Integrated education for communication disorders (1).ppt
seminarinclusive-180908161731.pdf
Integration class
Eden oxford 2014
Introductio1 (1) aiswarya (4)
Sir joseph presentation1
lnclusive education in B.ed course presentation
Inclusion, The Individual And The Environment - Session One
Hellenic educational system in special needs area
Building inclusive school culture tawheed parvaiz bhat
Costumized learning1
Educational system in singapore final revision

More from Stella Lamprianou (7)

PPTX
Learning and ICT by Hordaland County
PPTX
General school rules (english)
PDF
Delinquency leaflet
PDF
Delinquency 3
PDF
Delinquency 2
PDF
Delinquency 1
PPT
Illegal behaviour
Learning and ICT by Hordaland County
General school rules (english)
Delinquency leaflet
Delinquency 3
Delinquency 2
Delinquency 1
Illegal behaviour

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PDF
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
PPTX
20th Century Theater, Methods, History.pptx
PPTX
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx
PPTX
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
PDF
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PPTX
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PDF
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
PPTX
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx
DOC
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
PPTX
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
PDF
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
PPTX
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
PPTX
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
PDF
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
PDF
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين
PPTX
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
20th Century Theater, Methods, History.pptx
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
advance database management system book.pdf
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx

BEST PRACTICES Integration

  • 1. Best practices from Norway Integration
  • 2. http://arbere.eu/integration Main differences  No special schools but special education in customised training schools. Transport covered by the public. It is not the parents who have to run and pick up their children.  All students will go together in the same group based on the year they were born. Mentally and physically handicapped students in a class with non-disabled students. The same total number of teaching hours as other pupils
  • 3.  Physically handicapped students. The school can not say that they can not accept students in wheelchairs. Physical and psychological environment in the school edified for all students  Pupils with a mother tongue other than Norwegian have a lawful right to be educated in what is native. Special language tuition to improve in Norwegian.
  • 4.  When was it first applied? 30 years ago  Is it applied at all schools in the region or was it a school initiative? All schools  Do students seem to like this practice? Both disabled and non-disabled students seem to like it equally  Do teachers think that it is a good practice? Yes, it helps all of us combat discrimination  What are the benefits? Integration, awareness, socialisation. Respect by non- disabled students, being together.
  • 5.  Easily, by using Parallel Support as Special education in general schools.  Teachers show special support and adjust curriculum for students with special needs  Deteriorate cognitive outcomes for students with special needs (provision by state for university entrance, other forms of evaluation)
  • 6.  When was it first applied? 30 years ago  Is it applied at all schools in the region or was it a school initiative? All schools  Do students seem to like this practice? Yes, but especially parents because they are not obliged to change their daily programme  Do teachers think that it is a good practice? Yes, because students get special attention by public  What are the benefits? Independence to the whole family, students feel there is special provision for their problems, parents can choose school irrespectively of distance
  • 7.  High cost but shows social provision. Support to family  Help for parents who have to transfer their child
  • 8. Whether students with physical disabilities or not  When was it first applied? 10 years ago  Is it applied at all schools in the region or was it a school initiative? All schools  Do students seem to like this practice? Yes, they use them a lot  Do teachers think that it is a good practice? Yes, you are “in their shoes”. While simply changing seat, it means much more  What are the benefits? Feeling how it is, understanding, sympathy, getting used to diversity
  • 9.  Low cost, used wheelchairs from hospitals  Great innovation for typical Greek classrooms  Indirect way to train students
  • 10.  When was it first applied? By education law, 20 years ago  Is it applied at all schools in the region or was it a school initiative? All schools, by education law  Do students seem to like this practice? Yes, because school is adjusted to greater physical environment  Do teachers think that it is a good practice? Yes, we have to take care for students with disabilities and provide them with freedom in mobility while at school  What are the benefits? Social provision, show in practice respect for disabled, adjusted to regulations
  • 11. Potential transfer in Greek schools  High cost, but only once  Example since no facilities in greater physical environment  Indirect way to train students
  • 12. Some history of special education in Norway : In 1881 Norway got its first law governing special education . It should by law be organized schools for the deaf, blind and mentally retarded children. In 1951 Norway got a special school law which required the state to provide education for special needs groups in their own schools . The weakest were considered not proficient training and was therefore not covered by the law. • In 1975 a special school law repealed. Also children under school age were given the right to special assistance. In 1987, it was emphasized that all children as far as possible should be able to go to the school they geographically belongs.
  • 13. Young people with special needs got in 1982 first right to admission to secondary education. The same student group received in 1991 the right to upper secondary education for more than three years , when the expert assessment is made decisions about it. From 1994, when all young people in Norway had a right to three years of secondary education , got pupils with special education right to primarily chosen course and the opportunity to receive up to five years of secondary education. "One can say that inclusion is achieved when the term has lost its value - when all students receive instruction and training tailored to their requirements along with all the other children . "
  • 14. Thank you for your attention !