SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Designing And Conducting
Formative Evaluations
Gary Howard
BACKGROUND
• Preceding the present information, it is ordinary that an
underlying draft would have been put into a last creation and
after that disseminated to a particular populace. We discover that
the materials around then were not adequate to help the
instructional exertion.
OBJECTIVES
• Describe the reasons for and different phases of developmental
assessment of teacher created materials, educator chose materials, and
teacher displayed direction.
• Describe the instruments utilized as a part of a developmental
assessment.
• Develop a proper developmental assessment design and build
instruments for an arrangement of instructional materials or an educator
introduction.
• Collect information as per a developmental assessment anticipate a
given arrangement of instructional materials or educator introduction
THE CONCEPT OF FORMATIVE EVALUATION.
• The accumulation of information and data amid the advancement
of guideline that can be utilized to enhance the adequacy of the
direction.
PURPOSE
Purpose of The Concept of Formative Evaluation, and to obtain data
that can be used to revise the instruction to make it more efficient
and effective.
questions related to decisions you made while
developing the materials are appropriate for all
materials
• Are the materials appropriate for the type of learning outcome?
• Do the materials include adequate instruction on the subordinate
skills, and are these skills sequenced and clustered logically?
• Are the materials clear and readily understood by representative
members of the target group?
• What is the motivational value of the materials?
• Can the materials be managed efficiently in the manner they are
mediated?
Types of data to collect include the
following:
• Reactions of the topic master, whose obligation it is to check that
the substance of the module is exact and current.
• Reactions of an administrator or manager who has watched the
student utilizing the abilities in the execution setting.
• Test information gathered on section abilities tests, pretests, and
posttests.
• Comments or documentations made by students to you or set
apart on the instructional materials about challenges experienced
at specific focuses in the materials.
ETC
• Information gathered on disposition polls or questioning remarks in
which students uncover their general responses to the direction
and their view of where troubles lie with the materials and the
instructional methodology when all is said in done.
• The time required for students to finish different segments of the
guideline.
Role of Subject-Matter, Learning, and Learner
Specialists in Formative Evaluation
• SME might have the capacity to remark on the exactness and
money of the direction.
• Learning expert might have the capacity to investigate your
direction identified with what is thought about improving that
specific sort of learning
• Learner pro might have the capacity to give bits of knowledge into
the fittingness of the material for the inevitable execution
setting.
THE THREE PHASES OF FORMATIVE EVALUATION
• 1. One-to-One Evaluation
• 2. Small-Group Evaluation
• 3. Field Trial
EVALUATION
• distinguish and evacuate the most evident mistakes in the
guideline and to get introductory execution signs and responses to
the substance by students.
EXAMPLE
• The three main criteria and the decisions designers make during
the evaluation are as follows:
• Clarity: Is the message, or what is being presented, clear to
individual target learners?
• Impact: What is the impact of the instruction on individual
learner’s attitudes and achievement of the objectives and goals?
• Feasibility: How feasible is the instruction given the available
resources (time/context)?
LEARNER SELECTION
• A standout amongst the most basic choices by the designer in the
developmental assessment is the determination of students to
take an interest in the investigation.
• This isn't an analysis; there is no requirement for irregular choice
of substantial quantities of students.
• The designer needs to choose a couple of students who speak to
the scope of capacity in the gathering in light of the fact that
earlier learning or capacity is typically one of the real determiners
of capacity to learn new abilities and data.
DATA
• The primary class, message, identifies with how clear the
essential message is to the student dictated by such factors as
vocabulary, sentence multifaceted nature, and message
structures.
• The second classification, joins, alludes to how the fundamental
message is custom-made for the student, including settings, cases,
analogies, outlines, exhibits, et cetera.
• The third zone, strategies, alludes to attributes of the guideline,
for example, the arrangement, the span of fragment introduced,
the change between portions, the pace, and the variety
incorporated with the introduction
QUESTIONS
• How should the maturity, independence, and motivation of the
learner influence the general amount of time required to
complete the instruction?
• Can learners such as this one operate or easily learn to operate
any specialized equipment required?
• Is the learner comfortable in this environment?
• Is the cost of delivering this instruction reasonable given the time
requirements?
PROCEDURES
• The average system in a balanced assessment is to disclose to the
student that another arrangement of instructional materials has
been designed and that you might want his or her response to
them.
• You should state that any slip-ups that students may make are
presumably because of lacks in the material and not theirs.
• Encourage the students to be casual and to discuss the materials.
• You ought to have the students experience the instructional
materials as well as have them take the test gave the materials.
EVALUATE
• You should likewise assess the utility of the assessment
instrument, especially the accompanying components:
• The recognizability of every one of the components to be judged
ASSESSMENTS AND QUESTIONAIRES
• After the understudies in the coordinated trials have finished the
direction, they should survey the posttest and demeanor poll in a
similar manner.
After every thing or advance in the appraisal, ask the students for
what reason they made the specific reactions that they did.
SUMMARY/CHANGE AGENT
• When it goes to a change operator, they are in charge of working
together with alternate individuals on the expert group keeping in
mind the end goal to assume liability for both school and
instructional choices. In doing as such, these instructional choices
are making understudy focused learning groups.
• GARY HOWARD
• COACHGHOWARD@GMAIL.COM
• APT501/ASSIGNMENT 8

More Related Content

PPTX
Apt 501 assignment 8
PPTX
Designing and conducting formative evaluations10
PPTX
Apt501 assignment 10
PDF
12 Principles of High Quality Assessments (RE-UPLOADED)
PPT
Assessment principles
PPTX
Chapter 10 willis white
PPTX
Evaluation – concepts and principles
PPTX
Alternative assessment, portfolios, journals, interviews
Apt 501 assignment 8
Designing and conducting formative evaluations10
Apt501 assignment 10
12 Principles of High Quality Assessments (RE-UPLOADED)
Assessment principles
Chapter 10 willis white
Evaluation – concepts and principles
Alternative assessment, portfolios, journals, interviews

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Asl 2 lecture 3
PPTX
Chapter 8 Developing an Instructional Strategy
PPTX
Assessment
PPT
Classroom Assessment Techniques
PPT
Educational evaluation
PPT
Assessment: Achieving improved efficiency, effectiveness, educational integri...
PPSX
Diagnostic assessment report pptshow
PPTX
Educational Evaluation
PPTX
Classroom assessment techniques
PPTX
Assessment, types and purpose
PPTX
Samples of supporting student activities
PPT
ASSESSMENT: PRINCIPLES OF ASSESSMENT
PPT
8: Evaluation of Student Performance
PDF
Professional education reviewer for let or blept examinees
PPTX
Assignment 9 apt501
PDF
Testing a Test: Evaluating Our Assessment Tools
PPTX
Chapter 11 Apt 501
PPTX
Concept of Classroom Assessment
PPTX
Criteria for evaluation
PPT
Alternative means of assessment and evaluations in inclusive classrooms
Asl 2 lecture 3
Chapter 8 Developing an Instructional Strategy
Assessment
Classroom Assessment Techniques
Educational evaluation
Assessment: Achieving improved efficiency, effectiveness, educational integri...
Diagnostic assessment report pptshow
Educational Evaluation
Classroom assessment techniques
Assessment, types and purpose
Samples of supporting student activities
ASSESSMENT: PRINCIPLES OF ASSESSMENT
8: Evaluation of Student Performance
Professional education reviewer for let or blept examinees
Assignment 9 apt501
Testing a Test: Evaluating Our Assessment Tools
Chapter 11 Apt 501
Concept of Classroom Assessment
Criteria for evaluation
Alternative means of assessment and evaluations in inclusive classrooms
Ad

Similar to Designing and conducting formative evaluations (20)

PPTX
Designing and conducting formative evaluations chapter 10
PPTX
501 assignment 9 chapter 12 revision
PPTX
Presentation6
PPTX
Designing and conducting formative evaluations
PPTX
Chapter 12
PPTX
Chapter 10 (11 in my book)
PPTX
the grading and assessment ppt-7.p p t x
PPTX
Tieka wilkins. chapter 11pptx
PPTX
AT & DT by Laxman Kumar R
PPTX
ASSURE MODEL
PPTX
Designing and conducting summative evaluations
PPTX
Designing and conducting summative evaluations
PPTX
Revising Instructional Materials
PPT
PPT
PPTX
Designing and Conducting Formative Evaluation
PPTX
Designing and Conducting Formative Evaluation
PPTX
Evaluation the many faces
PPTX
Tieka wilkins chapter 12
PPTX
Specific techniques of curriculum evaluation
Designing and conducting formative evaluations chapter 10
501 assignment 9 chapter 12 revision
Presentation6
Designing and conducting formative evaluations
Chapter 12
Chapter 10 (11 in my book)
the grading and assessment ppt-7.p p t x
Tieka wilkins. chapter 11pptx
AT & DT by Laxman Kumar R
ASSURE MODEL
Designing and conducting summative evaluations
Designing and conducting summative evaluations
Revising Instructional Materials
Designing and Conducting Formative Evaluation
Designing and Conducting Formative Evaluation
Evaluation the many faces
Tieka wilkins chapter 12
Specific techniques of curriculum evaluation
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPT
robotS AND ROBOTICSOF HUMANS AND MACHINES
PPT
WHY_R12 Uaafafafpgradeaffafafafaffff.ppt
PDF
trenching-standard-drawings procedure rev
PPTX
Presentation.pptx anemia in pregnancy in
PPTX
LITERATURE CASE STUDY DESIGN SEMESTER 5.pptx
PPTX
URBAN FINANCEnhynhynnnytnynnnynynyynynynyn
PPTX
Acoustics new for. Sound insulation and absorber
PDF
SOUND-NOTE-ARCHITECT-MOHIUDDIN AKHAND SMUCT
PPTX
UI UX Elective Course S1 Sistem Informasi RPS.pptx
PDF
1 Introduction to Networking (06).pdfbsbsbsb
PPTX
Media And Information Literacy for Grade 12
PDF
GSH-Vicky1-Complete-Plans on Housing.pdf
PDF
intro_to_rust.pptx_123456789012446789.pdf
PPTX
8086.pptx microprocessor and microcontroller
PDF
2025_AIFG_Akane_Kikuchi_Empathy_Design.PDF
PDF
analisis snsistem etnga ahrfahfffffffffffffffffffff
PPTX
2. Competency Based Interviewing - September'16.pptx
PPTX
timber basics in structure mechanics (dos)
PPTX
Acoustics new a better way to learn sound science
PDF
Architecture Design Portfolio- VICTOR OKUTU
robotS AND ROBOTICSOF HUMANS AND MACHINES
WHY_R12 Uaafafafpgradeaffafafafaffff.ppt
trenching-standard-drawings procedure rev
Presentation.pptx anemia in pregnancy in
LITERATURE CASE STUDY DESIGN SEMESTER 5.pptx
URBAN FINANCEnhynhynnnytnynnnynynyynynynyn
Acoustics new for. Sound insulation and absorber
SOUND-NOTE-ARCHITECT-MOHIUDDIN AKHAND SMUCT
UI UX Elective Course S1 Sistem Informasi RPS.pptx
1 Introduction to Networking (06).pdfbsbsbsb
Media And Information Literacy for Grade 12
GSH-Vicky1-Complete-Plans on Housing.pdf
intro_to_rust.pptx_123456789012446789.pdf
8086.pptx microprocessor and microcontroller
2025_AIFG_Akane_Kikuchi_Empathy_Design.PDF
analisis snsistem etnga ahrfahfffffffffffffffffffff
2. Competency Based Interviewing - September'16.pptx
timber basics in structure mechanics (dos)
Acoustics new a better way to learn sound science
Architecture Design Portfolio- VICTOR OKUTU

Designing and conducting formative evaluations

  • 1. Designing And Conducting Formative Evaluations Gary Howard
  • 2. BACKGROUND • Preceding the present information, it is ordinary that an underlying draft would have been put into a last creation and after that disseminated to a particular populace. We discover that the materials around then were not adequate to help the instructional exertion.
  • 3. OBJECTIVES • Describe the reasons for and different phases of developmental assessment of teacher created materials, educator chose materials, and teacher displayed direction. • Describe the instruments utilized as a part of a developmental assessment. • Develop a proper developmental assessment design and build instruments for an arrangement of instructional materials or an educator introduction. • Collect information as per a developmental assessment anticipate a given arrangement of instructional materials or educator introduction
  • 4. THE CONCEPT OF FORMATIVE EVALUATION. • The accumulation of information and data amid the advancement of guideline that can be utilized to enhance the adequacy of the direction.
  • 5. PURPOSE Purpose of The Concept of Formative Evaluation, and to obtain data that can be used to revise the instruction to make it more efficient and effective.
  • 6. questions related to decisions you made while developing the materials are appropriate for all materials • Are the materials appropriate for the type of learning outcome? • Do the materials include adequate instruction on the subordinate skills, and are these skills sequenced and clustered logically? • Are the materials clear and readily understood by representative members of the target group? • What is the motivational value of the materials? • Can the materials be managed efficiently in the manner they are mediated?
  • 7. Types of data to collect include the following: • Reactions of the topic master, whose obligation it is to check that the substance of the module is exact and current. • Reactions of an administrator or manager who has watched the student utilizing the abilities in the execution setting. • Test information gathered on section abilities tests, pretests, and posttests. • Comments or documentations made by students to you or set apart on the instructional materials about challenges experienced at specific focuses in the materials.
  • 8. ETC • Information gathered on disposition polls or questioning remarks in which students uncover their general responses to the direction and their view of where troubles lie with the materials and the instructional methodology when all is said in done. • The time required for students to finish different segments of the guideline.
  • 9. Role of Subject-Matter, Learning, and Learner Specialists in Formative Evaluation • SME might have the capacity to remark on the exactness and money of the direction. • Learning expert might have the capacity to investigate your direction identified with what is thought about improving that specific sort of learning • Learner pro might have the capacity to give bits of knowledge into the fittingness of the material for the inevitable execution setting.
  • 10. THE THREE PHASES OF FORMATIVE EVALUATION • 1. One-to-One Evaluation • 2. Small-Group Evaluation • 3. Field Trial
  • 11. EVALUATION • distinguish and evacuate the most evident mistakes in the guideline and to get introductory execution signs and responses to the substance by students.
  • 12. EXAMPLE • The three main criteria and the decisions designers make during the evaluation are as follows: • Clarity: Is the message, or what is being presented, clear to individual target learners? • Impact: What is the impact of the instruction on individual learner’s attitudes and achievement of the objectives and goals? • Feasibility: How feasible is the instruction given the available resources (time/context)?
  • 13. LEARNER SELECTION • A standout amongst the most basic choices by the designer in the developmental assessment is the determination of students to take an interest in the investigation. • This isn't an analysis; there is no requirement for irregular choice of substantial quantities of students. • The designer needs to choose a couple of students who speak to the scope of capacity in the gathering in light of the fact that earlier learning or capacity is typically one of the real determiners of capacity to learn new abilities and data.
  • 14. DATA • The primary class, message, identifies with how clear the essential message is to the student dictated by such factors as vocabulary, sentence multifaceted nature, and message structures. • The second classification, joins, alludes to how the fundamental message is custom-made for the student, including settings, cases, analogies, outlines, exhibits, et cetera. • The third zone, strategies, alludes to attributes of the guideline, for example, the arrangement, the span of fragment introduced, the change between portions, the pace, and the variety incorporated with the introduction
  • 15. QUESTIONS • How should the maturity, independence, and motivation of the learner influence the general amount of time required to complete the instruction? • Can learners such as this one operate or easily learn to operate any specialized equipment required? • Is the learner comfortable in this environment? • Is the cost of delivering this instruction reasonable given the time requirements?
  • 16. PROCEDURES • The average system in a balanced assessment is to disclose to the student that another arrangement of instructional materials has been designed and that you might want his or her response to them. • You should state that any slip-ups that students may make are presumably because of lacks in the material and not theirs. • Encourage the students to be casual and to discuss the materials. • You ought to have the students experience the instructional materials as well as have them take the test gave the materials.
  • 17. EVALUATE • You should likewise assess the utility of the assessment instrument, especially the accompanying components: • The recognizability of every one of the components to be judged
  • 18. ASSESSMENTS AND QUESTIONAIRES • After the understudies in the coordinated trials have finished the direction, they should survey the posttest and demeanor poll in a similar manner. After every thing or advance in the appraisal, ask the students for what reason they made the specific reactions that they did.
  • 19. SUMMARY/CHANGE AGENT • When it goes to a change operator, they are in charge of working together with alternate individuals on the expert group keeping in mind the end goal to assume liability for both school and instructional choices. In doing as such, these instructional choices are making understudy focused learning groups.
  • 20. • GARY HOWARD • COACHGHOWARD@GMAIL.COM • APT501/ASSIGNMENT 8