SlideShare a Scribd company logo
2nd Edition – PDF Version
Principles and Design of
LOW VOLTAGE
SYSTEM
Teo Cheng Yu
Byte Power Publications
About this Book
As a clear and up-to-date guide, this book presents the principles and
design for low-voltage system at both the device and system levels.
It provides the characteristics, specifications and industrial standards
for circuit breakers, cabling, earthing and fuses. Utility supply system,
utility earthing system and consumer earthing system are introduced.
Standard design procedures, the latest code of practice, IEE wiring
regulations, overcurrent and earth-fault protection are illustrated
through a series of comprehensive and interesting examples which
are particularly useful for the practicing engineers and students.
Applications of computer-aided design and simulation are also
presented. Common technical terms, design formulae, touch voltage,
per-unit calculation and model examination questions with solutions are
provided in the appendixes.
About the Author
Teo Cheng Yu received the B.Sc. in Electrical Eng. from National Taiwan
University in 1971 and the M.Sc. in electrical machines and power systems
from the University of London in 1974. He has worked in many areas
of computer applications in power system since he joined the Imperial
College, University of London as a research assistant from 1973 to
1974. Subsequently he was appointed engineer, executive engineer,
senior engineer and project manager in the Public Utilities Board for
7 years. With the Nanyang Technological University for 24 years, he
was appointed Head of Division of Power Engineering for 6 years. He
was elected as the Chairman of the IEE Singapore Centre for 3 years
and is Fellow of the IET, Fellow of IES and Fellow of IEM. He is the
also author of three books in Pascal programming and the developer of
a number of PC-based integrated simulators for the design, assessment
and teaching of electrical system in buildings. He is currently the
General Manager of Byte Power Consultants handling operational
planning and simulation of a number of large HT and LV networks.
ISBN 981-00-6041-6
2nd Edition in pdf
Principles and
Design of
Low Voltage Systems
Teo Cheng Yu
B.Sc., M.Sc., DIC, CEng, PEng, FIEM, FIES, FIET
General Manager
Byte Power Consultants
Byte Power Publications
Singapore
iii
iv
The author wishes to make this book free for all. This book may be
reproduced in any form for all to read and study.
ISBN 981-00-6041-6
First Print: January 1995
Revised Second Print: July 1995
Revised Third Print: January 1996
Second Edition First Print: July 1997
Second Edition Second Print: January 1999
Second Edition Third Print: July 2001
Second Edition Fourth Print October 2002
Second Edition Fifth Print August 2005
Revised Second Edition Sixth Print March 2009
Revised Second Edition Seven Print January 2012
Final pdf version July 2015
Published in Singapore by Byte Power Publications
URL: http://www.byte-power.com
E-Mail: cyteo@ntu.edu.sg
iv
To My Family
Yeo Shai Ing
Teo Ee Ee
Teo Guan Siew
v
vi
Preface to Second Edition
In the undergraduate electrical engineering curriculum, much emphasis is
placed on electronic, communication, control and computer engineering.
Power engineering is also an essential field, which may be neglected in some
universities. Besides the traditional topics such as three-phase circuit,
magnetism, electromagnetic devices and DC machines, we introduce low
voltage (LV) system including utility LV network, earthing arrangements and
electrical installations from 15 kVA to 3000 kVA. Approximated by using a
single-phase representation, the calculations of voltage drop, earth-fault
and three-phase fault currents can be introduced.
It is felt that a basic understanding of earthing is essential and the various
earthing arrangements available in the LV system are good examples for
the illustration of system earthing. The majority of electrical engineering
graduates will possibly encounter more applications in the LV system rather
than the traditional generating and transmission system. The integration of
LV system at both the device and system levels into the undergraduate
curriculum of electrical engineering is therefore, relevant and practical.
In the second edition, Chapter 3 has been revised and the numerical
expression for the degree of adequacy of the overcurrent and short-
circuit protection are introduced. The concept of touch voltage and the
requirements of electric shock protection for TT and TN-S system have
also been revised in Chapter 4. For illustration, the assumptions made in all
the examples are now clearly stated. The latest CP5, IEE wiring regulations
and the relevant up-to-date IEC, BS and Singapore standards are referred.
Common technical terms, design formulae, touch voltage, per unit
calculation, tutorial questions and model examination questions with
solutions are provided in the appendixes.
Teo Cheng Yu
January 2005
vi
Preface
A basic understanding of the earthing
arrangements, in both the utility systems and
consumer systems, and the principles and
functions of low-voltage systems may be more
relevant to the practising engineers. The
majority of the electrical engineering graduates
will possibly encounter more applications in the
low-voltage systems. The integration of low-
voltage systems into the undergraduate
curriculum of electrical engineering is, therefore, timely.
This book presents the principles and design of low-voltage systems at
both the device and system levels and is written for both practising
engineers and undergraduate students. Throughout the book, references
are made to the latest international standards. Thus, the up-to-date
system requirements, specifications and technical data are made available
to help engineers/students in the study as well as hands-on design of
various low-voltage systems. The latest code of practice and the IEE
Wiring Regulations are discussed and illustrated through a series of
comprehensive and interesting application examples.
An overview to the utility supply systems and various key issues in the
generation, transmission and distribution systems are given in Chapter 1.
Characteristics, specifications and the relevant industrial standards for
circuit breakers, cables and fuses are covered in Chapters 2, 3 and 5. In
each chapter, the latest published IEC and BS standards are referred and
application guidelines are included. Methods of system earthing, earthing
arrangements in the transmission system and distribution system, and a
detailed description of various earthing systems for electrical installations
are provided in Chapter 4.
Standard design procedures, estimation of design currents and the design
of various types of circuits are presented in Chapter 6. Hands-on design
exercises of a 400-kVA and 2000-kVA installations are demonstrated
together with the supporting calculations that verify the compliance of the
requirements of earth fault and overcurrent protections. Sources of fault
currents, manual calculations and systematic calculations of the fault
vii
viii
current and its distribution using microcomputers are given in Chapter 7
together with a practical case study. Application of the latest techniques
of computer-aided design and simulation together with an attempt to
automate the teaching and marking process using microcomputers are
presented in Chapter 8.
The author wishes to acknowledge Miss Alice Chua Mei Fong for putting in
considerable effort in the typing and editing of this manuscript. The
author would like to thank Dr Duggal B R and Dr Gooi H B for reading
through this book and making their useful suggestions. Recognition is also
given to Mr. Thomas Foo Mong Keow and Mr. Yeoh Tiow Koon for their
effort in compiling the relevant materials and in preparing all the diagrams
in this book. The author, in addition, thanks Mr Teo Heng Lam for his good
suggestions on the system earthing in Chapter 4.
Last but not least, the author thanks Professor Brian Lee for his good
foresight in recognizing the significance of integrating electrical parts and
the relevant standards into the engineering curriculum in 1981. This has
provided the opportunity for the author to focus on the development and
teaching of low-voltage systems since then.
Teo C Y
MacRitchie Reservoir / Yunnan Garden
Singapore
January 1995
viii
ix
Contents
Preface vii
1 Introduction to Power Supply Systems 1
1.1 Electricity Supply Industry 1
1.2 Generation System 3
1.3 Transmission System 4
1.4 Distribution System 8
1.4.1 Schemes of Connection 9
1.4.2 Main and Backup Protections 12
1.5 Low-voltage Systems 13
1.5.1 Utility LV Networks 13
1.5.2 Consumer Installations 17
1.5.3 Scope of this Book 18
1.6 References 22
2 Circuit Breakers 23
2.1 Specification and Operation 23
2.2 Miniature Circuit-Breakers 29
2.3 Moulded Case Circuit-Breakers 33
2.4 Air Circuit-Breakers 37
2.5 Residual Current-operated Circuit-Breakers 39
2.6 Application Examples 44
2.7 References 49
3 Cable and Sizing of Conductors 50
3.1 Cable Construction 50
3.2 Cable Type and Selection 52
3.3 Current Rating of Cable 55
3.4 Voltage Drop Calculation 60
x Contents
3.5 Protection against Overload 65
3.5.1 Required Conditions for Overload Protection 66
3.5.2 Small Overload and Cable Utilisation 68
3.5.3 Omission of Overload Protection 69
3.6 Protection against Short Circuit 71
3.6.1 Required Conditions for Protection 71
3.6.2 Adiabatic Equation 75
3.6.3 Formulae for Short-circuit Currents 77
3.7 References 79
4 Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 80
4.1 Earthing in a Utility System 80
4.2 Methods of System Earthing 82
4.3 Earthing in Low-voltage Systems 85
4.3.1 Installation Earthing 86
4.3.2 TT System 88
4.3.3 TN-S System 90
4.3.4 TN-C-S System 91
4.3.5 TN-C and IT Systems 91
4.4 Earth Fault Protection 92
4.4.1 Protection on TN System 92
4.4.2 Protection on TT System 95
4.5 Application Examples 96
4.6 References 103
5 Fuses 104
5.1 Characteristic of Fuses 105
5.1.1 Current Rating and Fusing Current 105
5.1.2 I2t and Cut-off Current 106
5.1.3 Time-current Zone 109
5.2 Miniature Fuses 111
5.3 Low-voltage Fuses 112
Contents xi
5.4 Application Guides 115
5.4.1 Cable Protection 116
5.4.2 Motor Circuit 118
5.4.3 Electric Shock 120
5.4.5 Discrimination 121
5.4.6 Back-up for Circuit Breakers 122
5.5 References 124
6 Design Procedures and Examples 125
6.1 Design Currents 126
6.1.1 Design Currents in a Final DB 126
6.1.2 Design Currents in a Distribution DB 127
6.1.3 Procedure for Load Estimation 129
6.1.4 Standard Codes for Diversity 130
6.2 Design Procedures 131
6.2.1 Lighting Circuit 131
6.2.2 Socket-outlet Circuit 133
6.2.3 Motor Circuit 135
6.3 Example of a Two-storey Building 136
6.3.1 Final DB 137
6.3.2 Main Switchboard 141
6.3.3 Short-circuit Protection 142
6.4 Example of a Seven-storey Factory 144
6.4.1 Busbar 1 145
6.4.2 Busbar 2 146
6.4.3 Busbar 3 147
6.4.4 Short-circuit Protection 148
6.4.5 Earth Fault Protection 149
6.5 References 152
7 Calculations of Short Circuit Currents 153
7.1 Sources of Fault Currents 153
7.2 Step-by-step Calculations 154
xii Contents
7.2.1 Common Base Values 155
7.2.2 Fault at Location F1 158
7.2.3 Fault at Location F2 159
7.3 Systematic Calculations by Computers 161
7.4 A Case Study 165
7.4.1 Method A 165
7.4.2 Method B 170
7.4.3 Accuracy and Comparison 171
8 Computer-aided Design and Simulation 173
8.1 Design Element Representation 173
8.2 Design Methods and Design Files 177
8.3 Assessment and Costing 178
8.4 Automatic Drafting 179
8.5 Simulation Test 181
8.6 Integrated Tools for Teaching 186
8.6.1 Automated Marking and Grading 187
8.6.2 Full Test and Partial Test 187
8.6.3 Implementation of MIPTEIN 188
8.7 References 189
Appendix A Common Technical Terms 190
Appendix B Formulae for Design Calculation 193
Appendix C Touch Voltage and Fault Current Calculation 195
Appendix D Per Unit Calculation 202
Appendix E Tutorial for IEE Short Course 205
Appendix F Solution to Tutorial E 211
Appendix G Model Examination Questions with Solution 217
Appendix H VipCoda 228
Appendix I VipTein 233
Index 237
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION TO
POWER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Electrical supply is always available whenever you turn on a switch. After
the switch has been turned on, the supply is always continuous and unlikely
to be interrupted. In an urban city, the supply of electricity is rather
reliable and one may take it for granted that electrical supply is always
available. However, behind the scene of the reliable supply, there are many
utility’s managers, planners, engineers and technicians who are working
around the clock utilising various supporting facilities and tools to enable
the supply of electricity at a reliability of more than 99.99%.
1.1 ELECTRICITY SUPPLY INDUSTRY
The lead-time to construct a power station is five years. However, to
optimise the total capital investment and operating cost, it is required to
have a generation expansion planning for up to fifteen years ahead to
determine the type, size and timing of generating units. It is also required
to have a transmission system expansion planning to determine the
transmission voltage and transmission network to match the proposed
generation expansion plan. After the generating facilities and the
transmission network have been installed and commissioned, it is the task
of the operation engineers to carry out operation planning at intervals of
several hours, a day and a week ahead. The system control engineers, with
the supporting supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) facilities,
monitor and control around the clock the whole generation, transmission
and distribution system. Together with the engineers and technicians in
various power stations, the system control engineers have to ensure that
not only the real time electrical demand has to be met, but it has to be met
at a minimum production cost.
A power flow diagram for a thermal power station is shown in Figure 1.1.
The energy is converted from chemical to thermal form in the boiler; from
thermal to mechanical in the turbine and then from mechanical to electrical
in the generator. The voltage at the generator terminal is stepped up from
16 kV directly to 230 kV or 400 kV and the electrical power is transmitted
through the 400/230-kV transmission network to various load centres. At
each load centre, the voltage is stepped down and the electrical power is
Chapter 12
distributed through the 22 kV distribution network to various high tension
(HT) and low-voltage (LV) consumers.
22 kV
LV LV LV
66 kV
400/230 kV
Transmission
Step-up
Transformer
GeneratorTurbineBoiler
Fuel oil tank
Chimney
Condenser
Network
Load Centre
Substation
Figure 1.1 How electricity is brought to you
Electrical power systems, in comparison with many other systems, are the
most expensive in terms of capital investment and operating cost. They are
also the most influential in terms of seriousness of disruption on our mode
of life in case of breakdown. In the past, the cost of distribution system
was estimated to be roughly equal to capital investment in the generation
facilities, and together, they represented over 80% of the total system
investment. In recent years, these figures have changed to 50% for
generating plants, 30% for distribution systems and 20% for transmission
systems. Thus, for every $100 invested in the electrical infrastructure,
$50 will be used for the construction of power stations, $20 for the
transmission network and the remaining $30 for the distribution network
to provide electrical supply to each consumer. In addition, the annual
operation and maintenance costs including the fuel cost are about 230% of
the annual capital investment cost. In other words, for every one-dollar
invested in the generation, transmission and distribution plants, the utility
has to spend another two dollars and thirty cents to operate them
[Ref. 1, P 3].
Introduction to Power Systems 3
The annual capital expenditure for an utility having a maximum demand of
1500 MW can easily be 300 to 400 million dollars of which 50% or 200
million dollars is to cater for the investment of power plants. The complete
commissioning of a 1610-MW oil-fired power station in three stages over
six years will represent a capital investment of some 1100 million dollars.
The commitment to the complete commissioning of the whole 1610-MW
station would also imply the requirement of an annual fuel cost of some 400
million dollars for the full operation of the station. It is not only a decision
of the huge capital investment but also a commitment to revenue
expenditure for twenty to thirty years.
After analyzing the characteristics of generating plants given in Table 1.1
and depending mainly on the expected load growth and the actual
environmental constraints, the timing and the location of new power plant
can be determined. The main objective of the system planner is to select
the optimal plant type, size and timing such that the development and
operation cost is minimized over the years under consideration and the
annual load growth can be met reliably.
Table 1.1 Characteristics of Generating Plants
TYPE TYPICAL SIZE COST INDEX
THERMAL
EFFICIENCY
(MW) Capital Cost kWh Cost (%)
Oil-Fired 30-600 1.00 1.00 36-38
Coal-Fired 30-600 1.44 0.61 36-38
Nuclear 600-1000 1.78 0.16 31-32
Gas Turbine 20-110 0.56 1.36 27-28
Combined Cycle 90-300 0.85 0.88 41-48
Diesel Set 6-8 0.74 0.97 37-38
1.2 GENERATION SYSTEM
Unlike other energy supply systems, electric energy cannot be stored
economically on any large scale. It has to be generated and utilised at the
same time. There is, at all times, a balance between supply and consumption
of electric power. Owing to the inherent slow response of boilers in
thermal power stations, the system control engineers have to anticipate in
advance, the electrical demand for the next 24 hours and to commit the
generating plants accordingly to meet the forecasted demand. As there are
differences in thermal efficiency of different generators installed in the
Chapter 14
system, some generators are capable of producing cheaper energy than
others. Therefore, it is required to apportion the total demand among the
generators in a manner that minimises fuel costs. It is the task of the
system control engineers to decide when and which generating unit to run
up or shut down and how much to load each unit. Recent advances in
computer technology, mathematical modeling and optimisation techniques
enable an optimal solution to be achieved through off-line computer
programming or on-line real-time around-the-clock computer control.
Figure 1.2 shows a demand curve which represents the total load required
by all the consumers at each half-hourly interval for a typical weekday.
The peak demand of 1040 MW occurs at 11:00 am and the minimum load of
538 MW at 4:00 am. There are altogether twelve available generators in
four power stations. These generators are of different capacities and have
different thermal efficiencies. As shown in Figure 1.2, the system control
engineer has assigned three 250-MW generators running through 24 hours
without shut-down and three 120-MW generators and one 60 MW
generator to start-up and shut-down at different hours of the day. The
envelop of the generating capacity is a step function which represents the
maximum running capacity that the generating system can deliver at each
time interval. The excess capacity in MW resulted from the difference
between the maximum running capacity and the load demand is known as
spinning reserve at different time of the day. The task of the control
engineer is not only to minimise the generation cost, but also to ensure the
continuity of supply. At the same time he has to satisfy all the operating
constraints in the generating units and limitations of the transmission
network under normal and some abnormal conditions. Figure 1.3 shows the
system frequency response due to the sudden loss of two generators at
1100 hours. In this scenario, as the system has adequate spinning reserve,
the system frequency can recover to above 49 Hz after the shedding of 6%
of the system load at 49.2 Hz and another 8% at 48.7 Hz [Ref. 2]. The
operating cost including the generator start-up cost for a typical weekday
for two different sets of operating schedules are shown in Figure 1.4
[Ref 3].
1.3 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
The ideal arrangement for supply of electricity is to have a power station
located right at the load centre and generate power at the utilisation
voltage. Transmission system can then be eliminated. However, it is
Introduction to Power Systems 5
obviously not feasible to have a power station right in the city centre and
also it is not technically feasible to generate power in a large scale at the
utilisation voltage. An electrical system operated at 400 V can only supply
up to a maximum demand of 3 to 4 MW. At a higher voltage of 22 kV, the
maximum demand can be increased to 200 MW. For example, when the
maximum demand in Singapore exceeded 192 MW in 1965, a higher voltage
of 66 kV was implemented. Similarly when the maximum demand exceeded
781 MW in 1976, the transmission voltage was increased to 230 kV. The
next higher voltage of 400 kV will be required to match the maximum
demand of 5,000 MW in 1998. Higher transmission voltage has to be
introduced mainly due to the increase in short-circuit current which
exceeds the breaker’s breaking capacity. By operating at a higher voltage,
the number of transmission circuits can also be minimized. There are also
other technical and economic reasons in determining the appropriate
voltage level.
Maximum running
Demand
Figure 1.2 The engineer specifies unit commitment for Monday
Transmission of electrical energy by high voltage circuits is required in
order to bring bulk energy from a remote source to a load centre and at
the same time to interconnect between power stations. The interconnection
would increase the reliability of supply and would provide the spooling of
Chapter 16
generating plants so that the standby capacity can be reduced. The most
economic loading of generators can be achieved, and the overall production
and transmission costs can be minimised.
System Frequency
(Hz)
Time (Seconds)
Figure 1.3 System frequency response with load shed
Figure 1.4 Comparison of the daily operating costs
Introduction to Power Systems 7
The total investment cost of a transmission system can also be substantial.
An average annual investment of some 200 million dollars would be required
for a typical 230-kV and 66-kV transmission network development [Ref. 4, P
54]. The comparison of capital costs to transmit firm capacities ranging
from 750 MVA to 3000 MVA using transmission voltages at 230 kV and at
400 kV are given in Figure 1.5 [Ref. 5]. The essence of transmission
network planning is to search for the least-cost expansion of transmission
network within an acceptable reliability over a period of ten to twenty
years. In general, the task of the actual planning involves choice of voltage
levels; conductor types and sizes; voltage regulation and system fault
vels; timing of new substations and substation sizes; network expansion
onfiguration, and interconnection capacities.
le
c
Figure 1.5 Comparison of transmission costs for different voltage levels
In the day-to-day operation, the engineer has to monitor and control the
active and reactive power flows. The transmission voltage has to be
regulated by switching on/switching off reactors at different times of the
day. He also needs to ensure that all the generators are operating within
their active and reactive capability limits. A load flow simulation at 1030
hours for a model 230-kV transmission network is shown in Figure 1.6. In
this network, the engineer has to resolve three overloading circuits (one
230kV, 30km
400kV, 30km
5
4.0
400kV, 15km
230kV, 15km3.0
400kV, 5km
1.0
2.0
230kV, 5km
750 1500 3000
0.5
.0
Per Unit Cost
Firm Capacity (MVA)
Chapter 18
circuit from SNK to UJR and two other circuits from PSR to JUR) and a
reactive limit violation at power station SNK. During fault conditions, the
ngineer has to identify the types of fault, isolate fault and restore supplye
to as many areas as possible within the shortest possible time [Ref. 6].
Figure 1.6 Load flow simulation at 1030 hours
1.4 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
The main function of a distribution system is to receive electric power
from large, bulk power sources and to distribute electric power to
consumers at various voltage levels with acceptable degrees of reliability.
The most commonly used nominal voltages are 3.3 kV, 6.6 kV, 11 kV, 22 kV
and 33 kV. Depending on the load density and the annual growth rate in a
service area, the tendency is toward higher distribution voltage especially
for urban areas which have an increasing consumption of electrical energy.
By selecting a higher distribution voltage, appreciable savings in overall cost
can be achieved if the load density within the service area is high. In
Singapore, the primary distribution voltages adopted are 22 kV and 6.6 kV,
and the secondary distribution voltage at utilisation level is 400 V. In the
city centre or industrial estate, where the load density is high, it is
distributed at 22 kV and stepped down directly to the utilisation voltage
through 22/0.4 kV transformers. In areas where the load density is low, it
Introduction to Power Systems 9
is distributed at 6.6 kV and stepped down through 6.6/0.4 kV transformers.
Part of a typical distribution network consisting of 22 kV/LV, and 6.6
kV/LV or 6.6-kV/LV transformer is 1 MVA. The
tandard cable sizes are 10 MVA and 15 MVA for 22-kV circuits and 5.5
y of service required in
he load area. The system should be flexible to allow expansion in small
g load conditions.
kV/LV is shown in Figure 1.7. LV refers to the low-voltage system of 400 V.
A standard 66/22-kV intake substation has two to three incoming 66 kV
circuits preferably to be fed from two separate sources. Depending on the
size of the service area and the maximum estimated load in the area, the
installed capacity of each intake substation in Singapore is either 150 MVA
consisting of two 75-MVA 66/22-kV transformers, or 62.5 MVA consisting
of two 31.25-MVA 66/22-kV transformers. Normally, each intake
substation is built with a spare capacity for the third transformer to be
installed when required. The standard size of the 22/6.6-kV transformer
is 10 MVA and the 22-
s
MVA for 6.6-kV circuit.
The distribution system should provide service with a minimum voltage
variation and a minimum supply interruption. The overall system cost
including construction, operation and maintenance of the system should be
as low as possible and be consistent with the qualit
t
increments so as to meet changin
1.4.1 Schemes of Connection
The schemes of connection in a distribution network normally consist of
radial, ring and network systems. In a radial circuit arrangement, an
outgoing main feeder commences from the intake substation and feeds
directly into the area in a multi-drop configuration as shown in Figure 1.8.
The current magnitude is the greatest from substation A to B and then it
gradually reduces along the cable route until it reaches its minimum loading
level from substation E to substation F. As there is no duplication of
equipment, it has the lowest capital cost as compared with other schemes
of connection. However, the reliability of service continuity in a radial
system is low. A cable fault occurring between substations A and B will
result in the total supply failure from substations B to F, and the supply can
be restored only after the cable from substations A to B has been
repaired.
Chapter 110
In take S u b statio n
2 2 kV
2 2 kV
2 2 kV
2 2 kV
6 6 kV
L V
1 M V A
1 0 M V A
7 5 M V A7 5 M V A
6 .6 kV
6 .6 kV
6 .6 kV
2 2 kV
2 2 kV
L V
1 M V A
L V
1 M V A
L V
1 M V A
LV
1 M V A
LV
1 M V A
L V
1 M V A
Figure 1.7 Part of a typical distribution network
Figure 1.8 Radial circuit arrangement
To provide a better continuity of supply and to reduce the time taken in
restoration of supply, the connection in the 22-kV network is normally
arranged in a ring configuration as shown in Figure 1.9. The ring circuit
commences from the intake substation, makes a loop through the area to be
served and returns to the intake substation. There are normally five ring
circuits from one intake substation and in each ring circuit, there are
typically five 22/0.4-kV substations.
22 KV
B
A
C D E F
LVLVLVLVLV
Introduction to Power Systems 11
For illustration purposes, as shown in Figure 1.9, there are only two ring
circuits. In each ring circuit, it provides a two-way feed to each 22/0.4 kV
substation and therefore, at any one time, the tripping of any one circuit
will not interrupt any supply in the whole ring. However, in order to enable
the continuity of service, the cable size in each section of the ring should
have adequate capacity to carry all the entire load in one ring. In other
words, under normal conditions where there is no circuit out of service, all
the circuits in a ring will be loaded to only 50%. To enhance the reliability
supply and to cater for the loss of the intake substation, each ring circuit
can also have a stand-by alternative feed from a separate source as shown
in Figure 1.9. A 22-kV ring circuit arrangement integrating two separate
66/22-kV sources is shown in Figure 1.10 [Ref. 7]. A standby circuit which
has one end at normally open position linking two ring circuits from separate
sources such as the circuit between substations ‘a’ and ‘aa’ or substations ‘g’
and ‘rr’ is known as an interconnector network cut. This standby network
can be closed to restore supply during the failure of one 66/22-kV source.
A model 22/6.6-kV cable distribution network with two 31.25-MVA, 66/22-
kV incoming transformers extracted from part of an urban utility system is
shown in Figure 1.11. [Ref. 8] The loading in each circuit is given in MVA and
at each substation, there are two 22/0.4-kV transformers or two 6.6/0.4-
kV transformers which are not shown in the diagram.
LV
22 K V 22KV
LV
22KV22KV
to other
source
22KV 22KV
22KV 22KV22KV
22KV 22KV22KV
LV LV
LV LV
LV LV
LV LV
LV
to other
source
Figure 1.9 A typical ring circuit arrangement
Chapter 112
1.4.2 Main and Backup Protections
The reliability of modern power distribution system has been increased by
operating the network in a ring configuration and by interconnecting two or
more sources. The incoming transformer, busbar at each intake substation,
or each feeder in the network is normally provided with a main protection
(also known as unit protection) and a backup protection on overcurrent and
earth fault. The zones of each unit protection are shown in Figure 1.12.
Once a fault is detected in the protective zone, all the breakers in the
respective zone will be opened to isolate the fault. However, at times,
supply interruption is still unavoidable mainly due to fault or overloading in
the distribution network. If the fault can be detected and cleared by the
unit protection, the fault is usually confirmed to be within the zone of the
unit protection. Unfortunately, unit protection may not operate correctly or
may not be installed for every zone in the distribution network. In this
case, the clearing of the fault will have to depend on the backup
overcurrent and earth fault protection. In an interconnected network, it is
always a difficult task to grade the overcurrent/earth fault protection to
satisfy fault discrimination at every location. Thus, there may be more
breakers tripped than necessary to clear a fault and that the fault location
may be difficult to determine. In these situations, the operation engineer
has to rely on his knowledge of the distribution system, logical thinking and
judgment to diagnose the type of faults and its location.
k
jn
m
l
op
r
q
e f
hi
c
b
d
a
gg
ff
ee
dd
hh
jj
kk
ll
mm
nn
oo
ppqq
rr
ss tt
cc
bb
g
aa
ii
INC
INC
INC
66/22 kV
Source A
66/22 kV
Source B
To other
66/22 kV S/S
To other
66/22 kV S/S
To other
66/22 kV
S/S
Figure 1.10 Ring circuits integrating two 66/22 kV sources
INC
Interconnector
Network cut
66/22 kV
Incoming
22 kV/LV
Substation
Introduction to Power Systems 13
1.5 LOW-VOLTAGE SYSTEM
A low-voltage (LV) system refers to distribution voltages below 1000 V.
Typical nominal voltages in this range are 240, 380, 400, 415, 440, 480, 550
and 600 V. In Singapore, a LV system refers to the three-phase four-wire
system of 400 V between line-to-line, and 230 V between each line to
neutral. LV is not only the distribution supply voltage, it is also the
utilisation voltage of most of the electrical appliances. Consumers whose
incoming supply is 22 kV or 6.6 kV will have to design and install their own
HT and LV systems [Ref. 9]. For consumers taking LV supply from the
utility, the LV system prior to incoming supply will be managed by the utility
and these consumers have to design and install only their own internal LV
network. Thus, both the utility and the consumers have to be involved in
the design, installation and maintenance of the LV systems. Although
individual LV construction schemes are small, the large number of such jobs
carried out each year tends to absorb high capital and design resources in
the industrial and commercial LV systems.
Figure 1.11 A model 22/6.6 kV distribution network
1.5.1 Utility LV Networks
The method of connection from the utility’s LV network to each LV
consumer depends mainly on the types of the existing network, load density
and local utility’s regulations. The practices adopted by one utility may not
necessarily be the most economical under different circumstances for
Chapter 114
another utility. In Singapore, depending upon consumer’s load
requirements, electricity supply will be provided according to Table 1.2
[Ref. 9, P 9].
To other
66/22 KV
source
Busbar
protection
zone
Cable
protection
zone
Cable
protection
zone
Transformer
protection
zone
22 KV
66 KV
LV LV
LV LV
LV
LV
Figure 1.12 Zones of Unit Protection
Table 1.2 Types of Electricity Supply
Maximum capacity Voltage Circuit Arrangement
(kVA) (V) (phase) (wire)
23 230 1 2
2,000 400 3 4
30,000 22,000 3 3
>30,000 66,000 3 3
Introduction to Power Systems 15
For consumers taking supply at 22 kV or 66 kV, service connection will be
fed directly from the utility’s distribution network at the appropriate
voltage levels. For consumers taking supply at 400 V at 1000 kVA, the
supply will be fed directly either through a 22/0.4-kV or 6.6/0.4-kV
transformer as shown in Figure 1.13. Most of the consumers taking LV
supply less than 1,000 kVA will be fed through the utility’s LV network. A
typical 1,000-kVA LV board with six outgoing circuits is shown in
Figure 1.14. Each outgoing circuit is a 4-core 300 mm2 copper conductor
XLPE cable protected by a 500-A fuse feeding a number of overground
(OG) boxes in a radial configuration. Each OG box has five feeder units,
consisting of one incoming feeder from the LV board, another feeder
connecting to the next OG box and three service feeders each connected
directly to one consumer or a group of consumers as shown in Figure 1.15.
400 V
ACB
utility consumer
metering
link
1 MVA
22 KV
7x500mm2
/Cu/1C/XLPE
Figure 1.13 LV supply fed directly from transformers
The scheme of connection in the LV network is normally arranged in a ring
configuration. However, each ring circuit is operated radially through an
open link commonly known as network cut, as shown in Figure 1.16. Each
network cut can be closed to provide an alternative feed to each radially
operated ring circuit to facilitate cable outage due to fault or for
maintenance. As shown in Figure 1.16, there are two additional network cuts
known as LV interconnectors linking two LV substations. If one of the 22-
kV/LV transformer fails, these LV interconnectors can be closed so that
supply originally fed by the faulted transformer can be partially restored
by utilising the spare capacity from the other 22-kV/LV transformer.
Chapter 116
OG 1
500A
BS88
4 x 300 mm2
4C/Cu/XLPE
22 kV
or
6.6 kV
link
1 MVA
400V
OG 2
500A
BS88
4 x 300 mm2
4C/Cu/XLPE
OG 3
500A
BS88
4 x 300 mm2
4C/Cu/XLPE
OG 4
500A
BS88
4 x 300 mm2
4C/Cu/XLPE
OG 5
500A
BS88
4 x 300 mm2
4C/Cu/XLPE
OG 6
500A
BS88
4 x 300 mm2
4C/Cu/XLPE
Figure 1.14 A typical LV board
Zhang San
link
200A
BS88
BS88
200A
link
BS88
4 x 300 mm2
4C/Cu/XLPE
4 x 35 mm2
4C/Cu/XLPE
4 x 35 mm2
4C/Cu/XLPE
4 x 300 mm2
4C/Cu/XLPE
From LV board
3 circuits, Lee Si, A, B, C
2 x 35 mm2
2C/Cu/XLPE
Ah Meng
To next OG box
Figure 1.15 A typical OG box
Introduction to Power Systems 17
22 KV22 KV
LV Network CutOG Box
LVLV
Figure 1.16 Radially operated LV network
1.5.2 Consumer Installations
The installation earthing and the LV system should be so arranged such
that on the occurrence of a fault on any appliance, the voltage of any
conductive part likely to be touched by an individual should not reach a
dangerous level. In addition, every circuit should be protected adequately
against overload and short-circuit currents. Many accidents and injuries
that occur in electrical installations are due to insufficient knowledge of
the electrical personnel in wiring system. Knowledge and appreciation of the
implications of the wiring regulations or code of practice [Ref. 10], coupled
with the rationale and principles covering the LV system will ensure that
requirements for the safety of persons and property are met, and the LV
system is designed and operated properly at minimum cost.
The LV system covers the design of the whole range of consumer
installations from as low as 15 kVA to 2000 kVA for domestic, industrial
and commercial buildings. A simple LV installation of a 300 kVA, 2-level
shop-house is shown in Figure 1.17 and its tenant distribution boards in
Figure 1.18. The LV installation of a 2,000-kVA, 8-level hotel building is
shown in Figure 1.19. Due to voltage drop and economic reasons, for every
Chapter 118
high-rise commercial building over 24 levels, the electrical installation is
normally implemented using an HV/LV system. For example, the electrical
supply of a 72-level commercial building distributed by a combination of 22
kV and LV systems is shown in Figure 1.20. There are two 15-MVA, 22-kV
feeders feeding directly from the utility’s 22-kV distribution system to the
consumer’s intake 22-kV substation which is located at basement level B3.
The other 22-kV substation is located at level L22 and it is fed from the
intake 22-kV substation B3 using two 15-MVA 22-kV circuits. The supply at
utilisation voltage is obtained from 22/0.4-kV transformers located at
various strategic levels such as level B2, level L9, level L35 and level L61 as
shown in Figure 1.20.
All the 22/0.4 kV transformers are fed directly from the two 22-kV
substations at B3 or L22 using the transformer/feeder circuit arrangement
and there is no 22-kV switchgear at various strategic floors. The LV supply
will then be fed from the various strategic floors upwards or downwards to
individual levels using busways or feeder risers.
1.5.3 Scope of This Book
This book covers the principles and designs related to LV systems in
buildings. At the device level, it covers the principles, characteristics,
specifications and the relevant industrial standards of cables and various
types of protective devices such as miniature circuit-breakers, moulded-
case circuit-breakers, air-circuit-breakers, residual current operated
circuit-breakers and fuses. Code of practice and application guides for the
selection of various types of devices, the design of various circuits and the
sizing of conductors are also introduced. At the system level, the source
earthing system and the consumer earthing system are explained and
reasoned with reference to the IEE wiring regulations and the relevant
code of practice for earthing.
Earth fault protection and protection for electric shock are illustrated
with application examples. Sources of fault current and the approach and
formulae for the calculation of various types of short-circuit currents
which may occur in the LV system are given and described in details using
practical examples. Step-by-step design procedures and examples are
provided and the applications of computer-aided design to eliminate the
routine and repetitive design works are introduced. The suggested
approach of the computer simulation tests under a series of loading
conditions enables the designers to visualise the performance of the LV
Introduction to Power Systems 19
system designed by them and to experience any consequences due to the
design errors.
T1MCCB
100A
MCCB
63A
Level 2 Tenant DBs
MCCB
160A
MCCB
160A
Main Switch Board
MCCB
200A
T1
MCCB
63A
T1MCCB
100A
MCCB
63A
Level 1 Tenant DBs
T1
MCCB
63A
water
pump
sprinkler
pump
cu 60x6.3 mm 2
MCCB
400A
Figure 1.17 Single-line diagram for a 2-level shophouse
Figure 1.18 Tenant distribution board T1
Chapter 120
M
M
M
M M
M
M
M
M
M M
G
Fire
Pump
Figure 1.19 LV supply of an 8-level hotel building
Introduction to Power Systems 21
G
G
G
G
L61
L35
L9
T6
T8
LV
LV
LV
LV
T7
T5 T4
B2
T2T1
B3
L22
22 KV
22 KV
15 MVA 15 MVA
Figure 1.20 22 kV/LV supply of a 72-level building
Chapter 122
1.6 REFERENCES
[1] Turan Gonen, “Electric Power Distribution System Engineering”,
McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1986.
[2] Teo C Y, Gooi H B, “A Microcomputer-based Integrated Generation and
Transmission System Simulator”, IEEE Transactions on Power System,
Vol. 10, No.1, PP 44-50, 1995.
[3] Teo C Y, Gooi H B, Chan T W, “An Innovative PC based Simulator for
Power System Studies”, Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 38, No.
1, PP 33-42, 1996.
[4] “Public Utilities Board Annual Report 1993”, PUB, March 1994.
[5] Teo C Y, Lee Y O, “Determination of Transmission Voltage for a 8 GW
System in an Island”, paper presented at the CIGRE Regional Meeting,
Sydney, November 1987.
[6] Teo C Y, “Conventional and Knowledge based Approach in Fault
Diagnosis and Supply Restoration for Power Network”, IEEE
Transaction on Power Systems”, Vol. 13, No. 1, PP 8-14, 1998.
[7] Ong Kok Cheng, “Evolution of 22 kV Network Design and Operation
Concept to Enhance Reliability of Electricity Supply”, PUB Digest, May
1991.
[8] Teo C Y, Gooi H B, “Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosis and Supply
Restoration for a Distribution Network”, IEE Proceedings on
Generation, Transmission and Distribution Network”, Vol. 145, No. 4, PP
444-450, 1998.
[9] “Handbook on Applications for Electricity Supply”, Power Supply Ltd,
Singapore, 1996.
[10] CP 5 : 1998, “Code of Practice for Electrical Installations”, Singapore
Productivity and Standards Board, 1998
♦
♦
♦
♦
CHAPTER 2
CIRCUIT BREAKERS
To provide adequate overcurrent protection, each circuit should be
equipped with a circuit breaker for automatic interruption of supply in the
event of overload current and fault current. The circuit breaker installed in
a circuit should break any fault current flowing in the circuit before such
current causes danger due to thermal or mechanical effects produced in
the circuit or the associated connections. The breaker shall satisfy the
condition that the breaking capacity should be greater than or equal to the
prospective short-circuit current or earth fault current at the point where
the breaker is installed. A circuit breaker is a mechanical switching device
which should fulfil the following specifications .
It should be capable of being safely closed in on any load current or
short-circuit current within the making capacity of the device.
It should safely open any current that may flow through it up to the
breaking capacity of the device.
It should automatically interrupt the flow of abnormal currents up to
the breaking capacity of the device.
It should be able to carry continuously any current up to the rated
current of the device.
2.1 SPECIFICATION AND OPERATION
The rated current (IN) of a circuit breaker is the current that it can carry
continuously, generally for a duration of more than eight hours. The rated
current must not cause a temperature rise in excess of the specified values
when the ambient temperature is between –50
C to 400
C. Different
temperature rise limits are specified for different parts of a circuit
breaker. A circuit breaker will not operate (trip) if the current passing
through it is 105% to 113% of its rated current [Ref. 1, P 23], [Ref. 2, P 27].
It will take one to two hours to trip if the current passing through it is
130% to 145% of the rated current [Ref. 1, P 23, Ref. 2, P 27].
Breaking Capacity
The breaking capacity of a circuit breaker is the maximum current (in
r.m.s.) that flows through the breaker and the breaker is capable to
interrupt at the instant of initiation of the arc during a breaking operation
24 Chapter 2
at a stated voltage under prescribed conditions. The breaking capacity is
usually expressed in kA or MVA. Typical values range from 3 kA to 43 kA.
Making Capacity
The making capacity of a circuit breaker is the maximum current that will
flow through the breaker and the breaker is capable of withstanding at the
instance during a closing operation at a stated voltage under prescribed
conditions. Typical values range from 1.4 to 2.2 times the r.m.s. value of
the breaking capacity.
Load
current
Trip
lever
Bi-metal
element
Figure 2.1 Principle of tripping by a bi-metal
Tripping Mechanisms
To provide overload and short circuit protection, most circuit breakers
have a bi-metallic overload trip and an electromagnetic trip. The overload
trip is a thermal trip which works with a bi-metal. The bi-metal consists of
two metal strips of different temperature coefficients of expansion which
are rolled one on the other. The bi-metal is deflected when heated by the
current flowing through it. Figure 2.1 shows a schematic drawing of this
operation. The deflection of the bi-metal depends on the current
magnitude and its duration. After a pre-determined deflection, which
means after a certain time depending on the current magnitude, it will
activate the tripping mechanism. The deflecting bi-metal directly opens
the contacts or gives a signal to the switching mechanism to open the
contacts. The characteristic of the thermal trip can be widely influenced
by the design of the material and the shape of the bi-metal. The bi-metal
can be directly heated by the load current flowing through it or it can be
heated indirectly by a heater winding. The time-current characteristic of
the thermal trip is illustrated in Figure 2.2.
Circuit Breakers 25
Figure 2.2 Time-current characteristic of a thermal trip
10,000
Time (seconds)
1,000
100
10
1
0.01
0.1
1001 10
Multiple of rated current
Spring
Coil Fixed iron core
Load current
Hammer
trip
Fixed contact
Moving Contact
Movable
armature
Trip lever
Figure 2.3 Principle of tripping by an electromagnetic device
As shown in Figure 2.3, the electromagnetic trip consists essentially of a
coil through which the load current flows. Inside this coil, there is a fixed
iron core with a movable armature. If the current exceeds a pre-specified
limit, the armature will be attracted against the force of the spring. The
26 Chapter 2
switching mechanism is actuated by the lever on the right hand side and
provides the opening of the breaker contacts. Furthermore, on the left
side, a hook which is provided for the direct opening of the contacts will
accelerate the speed of operation.
Figure 2.4 shows the time-current characteristic of the electromagnetic
trip. With lower overload currents, only the thermal trip is active. For
higher current, as shown in Figure 2.4, the electromagnetic trip operates at
a current which is equal to 4 times the rated current. In this sample curve,
the breaker must not trip for a currrent less than 4 times the rated
current, and it must trip for a current equal to or greater than this value.
The tripping time is about 0.05 s. For higher current, the operating time is
shorter and is between 0.05 s to 0.01 s.
Multiple of rated current
Time (seconds)
0.1
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
0.01
1 10 100
Figure 2.4 Time-current characteristic of an electromagnetic trip
The manufacturer of a circuit breaker can modify the characteristic of the
bi-metal tripping curve and can also decide the magnitude of the current
for the electromagnetic trip. Figure 2.5 shows the combined curve of two
tripping devices whose characteristics are shown in Figure 2.2 and from
Figure 2.4.
Circuit Breakers 27
Multiple of rated current
10010
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
Time (seconds)
1
Figure 2.5 Time current characteristic of the combined tripping
Principle of Arc Extinction
The contact system comprises separate main and arcing contacts as shown
in Figure 2.6. The arcing contacts are fitted with arc runners to assist the
upward movement of the arc into the arc chute. The arc, initiated across
the arcing contacts, is forced upwards by the electromagnetic forces and
by the thermal action. The roots of the arc travel rapidly along the arc
chute. Here, its length is rapidly and considerably extended by the splitter
plates in the arc chutes. The arc is thus extinguished by lengthening,
cooling and splitting.
To interrupt short-circuit current, two different methods of breaking are
used, namely the zero point extinguishing system and the current limiting
system. The zero point extinguishing system can only be used in a.c.
systems and the current-limiting system can be used for both d.c. and a.c.
systems. Figure 2.7 shows the difference between the two systems by
comparing the arc voltage and the effective short-circuit current.
28 Chapter 2
Splitter Plates
Arc Chute
Arc
Runner
Arc
Arc
Contacts
Load
Current
Flexible
conductor
across
hinge
Load
Current
Figure 2.6 Principle of arc extinction
Industrial Standards
Circuit-breaker standards are numerous as most countries have their own
national standards for each type of circuit-breakers. However, progress in
the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) has led to the agreed
IEC Standards to be the base of their own national standards. The most
generally applicable IEC standard for low voltage circuit-breakers is IEC
947-2 : 1992 [Ref. 3].
The current British Standard (BS) has integrated with the European
Standards (EN) and is now abbreviated as BS EN. The latest British
standard for low-voltage circuit breakers is BS EN 60947-2 : 1992 [Ref. 1].
In Singapore, Singapore Standards (SS) are referred along with IEC
Standards and British Standards.
Low voltage circuit-breaker standards in the United States of America are
in general not equivalent to IEC specifications, and their ratings and test
criteria are not directly comparable. The relevant standards are issued by
the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Institute of
Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Underwriters Labs (UL) and
the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA).
Circuit Breakers 29
V
A
TL
TV
IK
ID
IN
IK
INia
ID
UN
ULUL
Ttot
ia
TV
TL
Ttot
UN
Zero point extinguisherCurrent limiter
UN = rated voltage
UL = arc voltage
IK = prospective short-circuit current
ID = short-circuit current limited by the miniature circuit breaker
IN = rated current
TV = pre-arcing mechanical operating time
TL = arcing time
Ttot = total time required for interrupting a short circuit (break time)
ia = tripping current
Figure 2.7 Comparison of two methods of breaking
2.2 MINIATURE CIRCUIT-BREAKERS
The miniature circuit-breakers (MCB) are used extensively for the
protection of final circuits in domestic and commercial installations. They
offer these circuits better protection, particularly when overload
conditions are being considered than the fuse alternatives. Most MCBs are
provided with two types of tripping mechanisms, namely the bi-metallic
thermal trip and the electromagnetic trip. With the electromagnetic type
of tripping, the switch can be closed again immediately after it has tripped.
Obviously, it may trip again if the cause is still there. With the thermal
trip, the switch cannot be closed again for a minute or two as the heater
element and the bi-metallic strip have to cool down first.
MCBs are available for both single-phase and three-phase circuits. In a
single-phase circuit, a single-pole MCB may be used in the live conductor or
a two-pole MCB connected in the live and neutral conductors. Three or
30 Chapter 2
four-pole MCBs are used for protection in three-phase supplies. If a fault
current flows through even one pole of an MCB, all the three poles will be
operated. This prevents single phasing, which may result in damage to 3-
phase motors. A cross-sectional view of a typical single-phase MCB is
shown in Figure 2.8.
Figure 2.8 Cross-sectional view of a MCB
Load
Arc splitter
pack
Load current
Plunger
Solenoid
Bimetal strip
The main standard for MCBs is BS 3871 : Part 1 [Ref. 4]. This standard
covers MCB ratings up to 100 A, breaking capacities up to 9 kA and voltage
ratings up to 415 V. This standard, however, has been withdrawn from 1
July 1994 and is superseded by BS EN 60898 : 1991 [Ref. 2] which is
similar to IEC 898 : 1995 and SS 359 : 1996 [Ref. 10]. The BS EN 60898
covers MCBs having a rated voltage not exceeding 440 V, a rated current
not exceeding 125 A and a rated short-circuit capacity not exceeding 25
kA. These circuit-breakers are used for protection in electrical installation
in buildings and similar applications. They are designed for use by
uninstructed people and to be maintenance free.
Circuit Breakers 31
Rated Voltage
Based on BS EN 60898 [Ref. 2], the preferred values of rated voltages are
400 V/230 V. Values of 380 V/220 V and 415 V / 240 V should
progressively be superseded by the values of 400 V / 230 V.
Current Rating
The preferred values of rated current are :
6, 8, 10, 15, 16, 20, 25, 32, 40, 50, 63, 80 100 and 125 A.
Short-circuit Capacity
Instead of specifying the breaking capacity, the standard specifies the
values of the short-circuit capacity. The short-circuit capacity refers to
the prospective current expressed by its r.m.s. value which the MCB is
designed to make (close), to carry for its opening time and to break under
the specified conditions. The standard values of rated short-circuit
capacity are 1.5, 3, 4.5, 6 and 10 kA. For values above 10 kA, up to and
including 25 kA, the preferred value is 20 kA.
Instantaneous Tripping
Based on the standard range of instantaneous tripping, MCBs are classified
into three types given in Table 2.1. In BS3871, they are classified as type 1
(2.7 IN to 4 IN ), type 2 (4 IN to 7 IN ) and type 3 (7 IN to 10 IN ). Another
older European standard classified them as type L, G and U. Type L is
similar to type 1 and types G and U are similar to type 2. In BS 3871:1984,
it specifies a category of duty, namely M1 (1 kA), M3 (3 kA), M6 (6 kA) and
M9 (9 kA).
Table 2.1 Range of Instantaneous Tripping
Type Instantaneous Tripping Current
B Above 3 IN up to and including 5 IN
C Above 5 IN up to and including 10 IN
D Above 10 IN up to and including 50 IN
Time-current Characteristics
An MCB shall have a fixed and un-adjustable time/current characteristic
calibrated at 300C given in Table 2.2. Typical time-current characteristics
of type C MCBs from 5 A to 100 A are shown in Figure 2.9. These
characteristic curves are identical to type C MCBs. By referring to the
curve of the 100 A and by transferring the Y-axis from amperes to the
multiples of the rated current of the MCB, the generalised time-current
32 Chapter 2
characteristic curves are shown in Figure 2.10 incorporating type 1, type B,
type C and type 3.
Time
(seconds)
Compiled with
BS EN 60898
Type C or
BS 3871 Type 3
Current
(Amperes)
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
Figure 2.9 Typical time-current characteristic for type C MCB
Table 2.2 Time-current Characteristics of MCB by BS EN 60898
Test Type
Test
Current
Initial
Condition
Test Period Result
1 B, C, D 1.13 IN Cold*
t > 1 h (for IN < 63 A)
t > 2 h (for IN > 63 A)
No
tripping
2 B, C, D 1.45 IN
Right after
Test 1
t < 1 h (for IN < 63 A)
t < 2 h (for IN > 63 A)
Tripping
3 B, C, D 2.55 IN Cold *
1 s < t < 60 s (IN < 32 A)
1 s < t < 120 s (IN > 32 A)
Tripping
4 B 3 IN
C 5 IN Cold *
D 10 IN
t > 0.1 s
(i.e. Instantaneous tripping
does not occur)
No
tripping
5 B 5 IN
C 10 IN Cold *
D 50 IN
t < 0.1 s
(i.e. Instantaneous tripping
occurs)
Tripping
* Cold means without previous loading and at 300C.
Circuit Breakers 33
1,000
100
10
1
0.01
0.1
1 10
Multiple of rated current
10,000
Time
(seconds)
Type 3 and Type C
Type B
Type 1
100
Figure 2.10 Generalised time-current characteristics for MCB
2.3 MOULDED CASE CIRCUIT-BREAKERS
Moulded case circuit-breakers (MCCB) are required for installations which
have higher fault level or higher current ratings exceeding 125 A. This
circuit-breaker is defined as an air-break circuit-breaker, designed to have
no provision for maintenance, having a supporting and enclosing housing of
mould insulating material, forming an integral part of the circuit-breaker.
Improvements in material science and better understanding of factors
influencing the performance of MCCBs have led to the production of very
compact MCCBs. It has basically three main elements, namely, the tripping
unit, the switching unit and a current interrupting unit. The switching unit is
normally held at ‘on’ position by a latching device. Tripping this latch
activates the spring which opens the breakers. It has a built-in thermal
tripping and an electromagnetic tripping. The thermal element which
senses the overload current has inverse time characteristic. The
electromagnetic tripping gives instantaneous operation on high fault
currents. The sensors operate the tripping mechanism and release the
latch.
MCCBs have several advantages over ordinary switches and fuses in the
control and protection of circuits and apparatus. They have a repeatable
non-destructive performance and are safe in operation under fault
conditions. In the case of the triple-pole MCCB, it has built-in mechanism to
34 Chapter 2
simultaneously open all three phases for a single-phase fault. All breakers
have, as a standard feature, the ability to disconnect automatically under
overload conditions, via bi-metallic thermal tripping in each pole. An
essential feature of all MCCBs is the quick make-and-break operation known
as ‘trip-free’ operation which is independent of the action of the operating
personnel. This feature is particularly important, when the operator closes
a circuit on fault.
These circuit-breakers are mainly used to protect main feeder cables for
incoming supply to sub-circuits/distribution boards and for large motor
circuits. For installation, MCCBs are suitable as free-standing units, or for
building into compact cubic-type switchboards. Auxiliary items such as
shunt trip elements, status switches, interlocks and motor-operated
mechanism for remote operation can all be integrated into the MCCB. The
usual current ratings are from 15 A to 1500 A at voltages up to 600 V. The
breaking capacity ranges from 10 kA to 65 kA. The built-in thermal tripping
and electromagnetic tripping can also be adjusted separately within a given
range after installation. An installed 400-A MCCB is shown in Figure 2.11a.
The internal construction and the dismantled parts of a 300 A MCCB are
shown in Figure 2.11b. Part of a typical switchboard integrating a number of
MCCBs is shown in Figure 2.12.
Fig 2.11a An Installed 400-A MCCB
Circuit Breakers 35
Fig 2.11b A 300-A MCCB with cover removed
MCCB Standards
The main industrial standards for MCCBs are BS EN 60947-1 [Ref. 5] and
BS EN 60947-2 [Ref. 1]. These two standards define the characteristics,
conditions for operation, methods for testing and the requirements for
circuit breakers with rated voltages up to and including 1000 V a.c. or 1500
d.c. These two standards were derived from IEC 947-1 and IEC 947-2
[Ref. 3]. The older standard BS 4752 was superseded by BS EN 60947.
Under BS EN 60947, there is no specification on the preferred voltage or
preferred current. However, the characteristic of the over-current
opening release is specified as follows at a reference temperature of 300C
+ 20C.
(a) At 1.05 times the current setting for 2 hours, tripping shall not occur.
(b) At the end of the 2 hours, the value of current is immediately raised to
1.3 times the current setting, and tripping shall then occur in less than 2
hours. For breakers less than 63 A, the duration of 2 hours should be
reduced to 1 hour.
36 Chapter 2
As there are no other standard values specified in BS EN 60497, the
followings are some typical technical data for reference.
Current rating : 10, 16, 20, 32, 40, 50, 63, 80, 100
200, 300, 400, 630, 800, 1250 A
Rated voltage : 380, 400, 415 V
Rated breaking capacity : 10, 20, 25, 35, 65, 85 kA (r.m.s.)
Rated making capacity : 17, 44, 53, 63, 84, 143 kA (peak)
Figure 2.12 Part of a switchboard integrated with three MCCBs
The time-current characteristic of a typical MCCB is shown in Figure 2.13
indicating the range of adjustments for both the thermal tripping and
electromagnetic tripping. Range ‘a’ refers to an ambient temperature of
Circuit Breakers 37
200C and range ‘b’ refers to 400C. Range ‘c’ refers to the magnetic release
at 5 IN and range ‘d’ refers to 10 IN. The design engineer has to specify
either range ‘c’ or ‘d’ when ordering.
Figure 2.13 Time-current characteristic of a typical MCCB
2.4 AIR CIRCUIT-BREAKERS
One of the oldest forms of automatic protective device is the air circuit-
breaker (ACB). It consists of an operating mechanism, main contacts,
arcing contacts, arc chute and a built-in overcurrent tripping device. The
name ACB is normally applied to large breakers that do not fall into the
category of MCB or MCCB, although both MCB and MCCB are also air-break
circuit-breakers. The ACBs are characterised by their sturdy construction,
ample electrical clearances, availability in high-current-carrying,
interrupting and making ratings. The tripping devices are adjustable to
20 o C
40
o
C
1.5
0.1
0.01
1.05 2 5 10 Multiple of rated current
6
6
6
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
10
2 hr
1 hr
100
1,000Time
(seconds)
a
b
c d
38 Chapter 2
meet the required pick up setting and operating time. Various shapes of
time-current characteristics are also available.
The air circuit-breakers are intended primarily for application in main
switchboards to protect the incoming circuit fed by either a local
generator or the low voltage side of a transformer directly from the power
utility. They are also applicable for an individual branch-circuit protection
where the highest quality device is required and where special time-current
characteristics are necessary for co-ordination. These circuit-breakers
are constructed for longer life than the other types of low-voltage circuit
breakers and are, therefore, suitable for many more operations. However,
unlike the MCCB or MCB, this type of equipment needs regular inspection
and maintenance.
Fig 2.14a A 3000-A ACB at operating position
Circuit Breakers 39
The ACB is currently covered under BS EN 60947 [Ref. 1, Ref. 5] with the
same specification as that described in section 2.3 for MCCB. Typically, an
ACB manufacturer produces breakers with current ratings in the range 800
to 5000 A and a breaking capacity up to 120 kA. The followings are some
typical data for reference.
Rated voltage : 400, 415, 690 V
Rated current : 800, 1250, 1600, 2000, 3200, 5000 A
Rated breaking capacity : 40, 65, 80, 120 kA (r.m.s)
Rated Making capacity : 84, 143, 220 kA (peak)
A typical 3000-A ACB at loading position is shown in Figure 2.14a and the
zoom-in view in Figure 2.14b. A cross-sectional view of a typical ACB is
shown in Figure 2.15 and the time-current characteristics in Figure 2.16.
Figure 2.14b A zoom-view of the 3000-A ACB
.
2.5 RESIDUAL CURRENT-OPERATED CIRCUIT-BREAKERS
The Residual Current-operated Circuit-Breakers (RCCB) are primarily
designed to protect against ‘indirect contact’ electric shock. The term
‘indirect contact’ refers to the contact of the supply voltage indirectly
40 Chapter 2
through the touching of the exposed-conductive-part such as the metallic
enclosures of electrical appliances, the metallic conduit, trunking or cable
tray. These exposed-conductive-parts are insulated from the live conductor
and are connected to the earthing terminal and thus, should be at the earth
potential. However, during an earth fault, as there is an earth fault
current flowing from the live conductor through the exposed-conductive-
parts to earth, the exposed metalwork may be at a high potential relative
to earth. Touching the exposed-conductive-parts at this instance may
cause an electric shock if its potential to earth exceeds 50 V.
Furthermore, if it is a high impedance earth fault, the magnitude of the
earth fault current may not activate the overcurrent protective device.
Thus, a current will continue to flow to earth, possibly generating heat and
causing fire. RCCB is designed to detect such a residual current (i.e. earth
leakage current), to compare it to a reference value and to open the
protected circuit when the residual current exceeds this reference value.
Arc chute
Fixed arcing contact
Moving arcing contact
Fixed main contact
Moving main contact
Primary disconnecting
terminals (main circuit) (clip
type)
Current transformer
External
Relay
Motor (option)
Figure 2.15 A cross-sectional view of an ACB
In this way, a RCCB provides an excellent protection against the risk of
electric shock and provides an excellent protection against the possibility
of fire resulting from earth fault currents which tend to persist for
lengthy periods without operating the overcurrent protective device. The
primary function of a RCCB is to give protection against ‘indirect contact’.
However, for RCCBs having operating residual currents not exceeding 30
mA, there is an additional benefit, should other methods of protection fail,
the RCCB will provide a high degree of protection to a user making direct
contact with a live conductive part.
Circuit Breakers 41
1 2 5 10 100
Multiple of rated current
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1,000
Time
(seconds)
MAX
MED
MIN
4 to 10
2 to 4
Adjustable
Figure 2.16 Time-current characteristics of a typical ACB
Principle of Operation
Figure 2.17 shows that an earth leakage current of 2 A passing through the
live conductor on its way to earth, but not returning through the neutral.
The difference between the phase and neutral currents is thus the earth
leakage current. The principle of operation of a RCCB is shown in Figure
2.18. The main contacts are closed against spring pressure and the loaded
spring provides the energy to open the contacts when the retaining
mechanism is tripped. Phase and neutral currents pass through identical
coils wound in opposite directions on a magnetic core, so each coil provides
equal but opposite ampere-turns and no magnetic flux is set up when the
currents are equal. Earth leakage current increases the phase current,
which provides more ampere-turns than those from the neutral coil, and an
alternating magnetic flux is set up in the core. This induces an e.m.f. in the
search coil, which results in a current flowing in the trip coil, and the main
contacts are tripped. For circuit breakers operating at low residual
currents, an amplifier may be used. The main contacts are mechanically
operated and the trip mechanism may become stiff with age. Frequent
42 Chapter 2
testing is advisable, and a test circuit is included to provide an artificial
residual current.
N
L
230 V
neutral current 10A
earth fault current 2A
phase current 12A
load current
10A
load
resistance
23 Ω
fault resistance 115 Ω
fault
current
2A
2A
Figure 2.17 The earth leakage current
Although the operating principle of a RCCB has been described in a single
phase circuit, the same principle applies equally well to a three-phase RCCB.
In a 3-phase 4-wire system, the circuit arrangement in the magnetic core is
modified as shown in Figure 2.19. The red, yellow and blue phases and the
neutral wire are wound on the common core in such a way that the search
coil senses the phasor sum of the four currents (i.e. red, yellow, blue and
neutral). In this arrangement, the magnetic flux produced by the current
in the neutral will be compensated by the magnetic flux produced by the
unbalanced current in the phase conductors.
230V
L
N
amplifier
trip
coil search
coil
magnetic
core
test
button load
R
Figure 2.18 Principle of the operation of RCCBs
RCCBs are not designed to have a high breaking capacity and in fact, they
have only a limited breaking capacity. They are therefore, not a
replacement for other overcurrent protective devices which are designed
to interrupt high fault currents. However, RCCBs are type-tested to
ensure that they will withstand large fault currents that may pass through
Circuit Breakers 43
them at close position. Thus, it is normally recommended to have an
overcurrent protective device connected in series with the RCCB.
R Y B N
Search Coil
Magnetic
core
to activate tripping
Figure 2.19 Detecting leakage current in a 3-phase 4-wire system
RCCB Standards
There are four standards for RCCBs namely, BS 4293 : 1983 [Ref. 6], IEC
755 : 1983 (1992) [Ref. 7], IEC 1008-1 : 1990 [Ref. 8] and Singapore
Standard SS 97 : 1994 [Ref. 9]. BS 4293 specifies the requirements for
residual current-operated circuit breakers having a rated voltage not
exceeding 660 V, a rated current not exceeding 125 A and a rated
frequency not exceeding 400 Hz. IEC 755 applies to residual current-
operated protective devices for a rated voltage not exceeding 440 V and a
rated current not exceeding 200 A with a rated residual current up to 20 A
intended principally for protection against electric shock. IEC 1008 -1
applies to RCCBs for household and similar uses for a rated voltage not
exceeding 440 V and a rated current not exceeding 125 A with a rated
residual current up to 0.5 A intended principally for protection against
electric shock. The Singapore Standard SS 97 is just an endorsement of
the IEC 1008 -1. Based on IEC 1008, RCCBs are specified as follows :
Preferred rated voltage
Single-phase, phase-to-neutral : 230 V
Three-phase, three-wire : 400 V
Three-phase, 4-wire : 400 V
Preferred rated current (IN)
10, 13, 16, 20, 25, 32, 40, 63, 80, 100, 125 A
Rated residual operating current (I NΔ )
0.006, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5 A
44 Chapter 2
Standard value of residual non-operating current (I NΔ 0)
0.5 I NΔ
Minimum value of the rated making and breaking capacity
10 IN or 500 A whichever is greater
Rated conditional short-circuit current
This is the prospective short-circuit current passing through the RCCB at
close position and the RCCB can withstand under the specified conditions.
3, 4.5, 6, 10, 20 kA
Maximum break time
0.3 s for residual current equal to I NΔ
0.15 s for residual current equal to 2 I NΔ
0.04 s for residual current equal to 5 I NΔ
0.04 s for residual current equal to 500 A
Other requirements
RCCBs shall be protected against short-circuits by means of circuit-
breakers or fuses.
♦
♦ RCCBs are essentially intended to be operated by uninstructed
persons and designed to be maintenance free.
2.6 APPLICATION EXAMPLES
The low-voltage supply to a two-storey shophouse is shown in Figure 1.17
and Figure 1.18. MCCBs are used in the main incoming circuit and the three
outgoing circuits at the main switchboard as shown in Figure 1.17. For the
tenant DB T1 as shown in Figure 1.18, one MCCB and one RCCB are used at
the incoming circuit, and both single-phase and three-phase MCBs are used
for all the outgoing circuits.
Examples 2.1
A distribution board(DB) has a RCCB rated at 63 A with a residual
operating current I = 0.03 A, and three final circuits, each protected by
a type C MCB rated at 25 A as shown in Figure 2.20. Determine the
operating time of the RCCB and MCB under each of the following conditions
:
NΔ
Circuit Breakers 45
a) A constant overload of 28 A for 1 hour in the first circuit.
b) A sustained short-circuit current of 2000 A from live-to-neutral in the
second circuit.
c) A high impedance sustained short-circuit current of 63.75 A from live-
to-earth in the third circuit.
Figure 2.20 A simple DB
Solution
a) The RCCB will not operate since the phasor sum of the overload
currents is zero. The 25-A MCB will not operate since the overload is
less than 1.13 IN. From Table 2.2, tripping should not occur at I = 1.13
IN and for t > 1 hr. This can also be verified by examining the time-
current characteristics shown in Figures 2.9 or 2.10.
b) The RCCB will not operate since the short circuit is from live-to-neutral
which has a zero phasor sum. The short-circuit current is 2000/25 =
80 IN which is more than 10 IN. From Table 2.2, the operation time of
the MCB is less than 0.1 s.
c) The residual current is 63.75/0.03 = 2125 I NΔ which is greater than 5
I NΔ . Based on IEC 1008, the maximum break time for a residual
current more than 5 I NΔ is 0.04 s. If the RCCB fails to operate, the
MCB will operate according to Table 2.2 within 60 s since the earth
fault current is 63.75/25=2.55 IN. The operating time obtained from
Figure 2.9 or Figure 2.10 is 50 s.
RCCB
63A
MCB
25A
I = 0.03A
O/L = 28A for 1 hour
IF,LN = 2000A
IF,LE = 63.75A
Δn
MCB
25A
MCB
25A
46 Chapter 2
Example 2.2
Determine the type of protective device and the required breaking capacity
for a circuit supply to a 3-phase motor which is rated at 20 kW, 95%
efficiency and 0.85 power factor. This motor has a DOL starter. The main
switchboard is fed by a 1-MVA, 22-kV/LV transformer which has a leakage
impedance of 5% as shown in Figure 2.21. Determine the current rating of
the circuit breaker for ambient temperatures of 200C and 400C
respectively. The time-current characteristic curve of the protective
device is shown in Figure 2.13.
22 kV LV1 MVA
5 %
95% Eff.
0.85 p.f.
20 kW
? DOL M
Figure 2.21 Determine the type of protective device
Solution
Let the design current be the full load current :-
A75.35
400385.095.0
1020 3
.. =
×××
×
== LFB II
For a DOL starter, the motor starting current is seven times the full load
current(i.e. 250 A). This high starting current will be reduced to the full
load current within 10 s. The 5% impedance of the 1 MVA transformer with
respect to the voltage at 400 V is
Z = 5% x (4002
/ 1 x 106
)= 0.008 Ω
The maximum current that may pass through the breaker occurs during a
3-phase fault at the breaker terminal. The current per-phase during the 3-
phase fault at the breaker terminal is:
IF,3-phase,breaker terminal = (400 / 3 ) / 0.008 = 28.867 kA
Thus, the type of protective device should be a MCCB with a breaking
capacity more than 28.867 kA. A MCCB with a breaking capacity of 35 kA is
selected. For an ambient temperature of 200
C, a 63-A MCCB is adequate.
The starting current expressed as a multiple of the breaker rating is :
NI3.97
63
250
I ×==,S
Circuit Breakers 47
From Figure 2.13, the operating time of the breaker is 18 s which is greater
than the starting duration of 10 s and thus, this breaker will not trip during
motor starting.
For an ambient temperature of 400C as shown in Figure 2.13 and for the
operating time of 10 s, the corresponding current multiplier is 2.2. Thus,
the current rating of the MCCB should be greater than Imin :
A113
2.2
250
Imin ==
Thus, a current rating of 200 A is selected.
Example 2.3
The low-voltage supply to a high-rise block is shown in Figure 2.22. A short
circuit occurs inside a final distribution board at the top floor. The fault
current is 200 A.
(a) What is the operating time of the incoming protective device at the
final DB under the following assumption?
(i) a type B MCB rated at 32 A
(ii) a type 3 MCB rated at 32 A
(iii) a RCCB rated at 40 A with I NΔ = 0.03 A
(b) Determine the operating time of the MCCB rated at 300 A at the main
switchboard of the block.
(c) Determine the operating time of the BS 88 fuse rated at 400 A at the
PUB substation.
Solution
(a)
(i) For a type B MCB rated at 32 A, the fault current expressed as a
multiple of the rated current is :
IF = =
200
32
6 25. IN
The operating time obtained from Table 2.2 or from Figure 2.10 is less
than 0.1 s.
48 Chapter 2
(ii) For a type 3 MCB rated at 32 A, the fault current is :
IF = =
200
32
6 25. IN
The operating time is 8 s obtained from Figure 2.10.
(iii) For a RCCB rated at 40 A with A03.0I N =Δ , the RCCB will not operate
if the fault current of 200 A is due to a live-to-neutral fault. If it is a live-
to-earth fault, the operating time is 0.04 s, since the residual current is
200/0.03 = 6667 I NΔ .
(b) The MCCB rated at 300 A will not operate unless it is an earth fault and
the MCCB is equipped with an earth fault relay.
(c) The BS 88 fuse rated at 400 A will not operate at a current of 200 A.
Figure 2.22 LV Supply to a high-rise Block
MCB
32A
200A
MCCB
300A
Main
Switchboard
BS 88 fuse
400A
Utility
A final DB at top floor
Circuit Breakers 49
2.7 REFERENCES
[1] BS EN 60947-2 : 1992, “Low voltage switchgear and controlgear, Part
2. Circuit Breaker”, The British Standard, 1992.
[2] BS EN 60898 : 1991, “Circuit breakers for overcurrent protection for
household and similar installations”, The British Standard, 1991.
[3] IEC 947-2 : 1989, “Low voltage switchgear and controlgear Part 2 :
Circuit Breakers”, International Electrotechnical Commission, 1989.
[4] BS 3871 : Part 1 : 1965 (1984), “Miniature air-break circuit breakers
for a.c. circuits”, British Standard, 1984.
[5] BS EN 60947-1 : 1992, “Low voltage switchgear and controlgear Part 1.
General Rules”, The British Standard, 1992.
[6] BS 4293 : 1983, “Residual current-operated circuit-breakers”, The
British Standard, 1983.
[7] IEC 755 : 1983 (1992), “General requirements for residual current
operated protective devices”, International Electrotechnical
Commission, 1992.
[8] IEC 1008-1 : 1990, “Residual current operated circuit-breakers
without integral overcurrent protection for household and similar uses
(RCCB’s), Part 1 : General Rules”, International Electrotechnical
Commission, 1990.
[9] SS 97 : Part 1 : 1994, “Residual current circuit breaker without
integral overcurrent protection for household and similar uses
(RCCB’s)”, SISIR, 1994.
[10] SS 359 : 1996, “Circuit breakers for overcurrent protection for
household and similar installations”, SISIR, 1996.
CHAPTER 3
CABLE AND
SIZING OF CONDUCTORS
Cables are the means by which electrical energy is distributed from its
source to its point of use. A cable can be defined as a length of insulated
single conductor or of two or more such conductors each provided with its
own insulation which are laid up together. The insulated conductor or
conductors may or may not be provided with overall covering for mechanical
protection. A single-core cable refers to a cable that has only one insulated
conductor with its own cable sheath, and a multi-core cable refers to a
cable that has multiple cores of insulated conductors within one common
sheath. Figure 3.1 illustrates a twin-core, pvc-insulated, pvc-bedded, steel-
wire-armoured, pvc-sheathed cable made to BS 6346 : 1989 [Ref. 1].
Cables also form an essential part of communications, security and control
systems. Cables for these systems must be chosen to avoid interference
from the power cable [Ref. 2, Ref. 4].
PVC Sheath Steel wire armoured
PVC insulated
Conductor
Figure 3.1 A PVC-insulated steel-wire-armoured cable
3.1 CABLE CONSTRUCTION
The conductor of a cable refers to one conductor or several conductors
which provides electrical paths. They are fabricated from metals having
low resistivity. A conductor may be formed from solid material or made up
from a number of strands of smaller wire. Conductors are made in a
number of standard metric cross-sectional areas in the range from 1.5mm2
to 1000 mm2.
50
Cable and Sizing of Conductors 51
The two common types of conductor material are copper and aluminium.
The specific resistance of copper and aluminium at 700C is 0.017 and
0.0283 respectively, both expressed in Ω per mm2 per metre. In recent
years, aluminium has become a major alternative to copper as a conductor
material because of its attractive price. However, aluminium has a higher
specific resistance than copper and is therefore, not a good conductor
compared to the same size of the copper conductor. For the same current
rating, a 300 mm2 aluminium cable is approximately equivalent to a 185 mm2
copper cable under the same conditions of installation.
Insulation
The insulation surrounds each conductor to prevent direct contact between
individual conductors and earth. The type of insulation will depend on the
voltage of the system, the operating temperature of the conductors, and
the mechanical and environmental conditions affecting the cable during
both installation and operation. Typical types of insulation materials are;
polyvinyl chloride (pvc), rubber, cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE), powdered
mineral, and oil impregnated paper tapes.
A conductor and its immediate insulation is colloquially known as a core. A
cable may comprise a single core with or without further mechanical
protection or a number of cores laid up together and held in position by a
sheath or tape binding.
Cable cores are generally identified by colour code : red, yellow, blue for
phase conductors, black for neutral and green/yellow for circuit protective
conductors (earth conductors) according to BS 6004 : 1991 [Ref. 3]. The
rated voltage of a cable is normally expressed as V0/V when V0 is the
voltage between any insulated conductor to earth and V is the voltage
between phase-conductors of a multi-core cable or of a system of single-
core cables. Low-voltage power cables are generally rated at 450/750 V
[Ref. 3] or 600/1000 V [Ref. 1] regardless of the voltage used, be it 120 V,
230V, 240V or 400V.
External Protection
Wiring cables intended for installation in a conduit, trunking or similar
enclosures are usually insulated single-core cables and are unsuitable for
installation in other circumstances. Other types of cable are provided with
further external protection.
52 Chapter 3
External protection applied over the various cores of the cable (one core or
more) is intended to provide protection against mechanical damage and
hostile environmental attacks. It is also intended in the case of power
cables, particularly HV cables, to provide resistance to the considerable
mechanical forces which may occur under short-circuit fault conditions. In
the case of conductors insulated with oil impregnated tapes, the external
sheath is usually made of extruded lead or lead alloy, designed to form a
anti-moisture protection for the hydrotropic insulation. For other cables,
the external protection may comprise metallic or plastic sheaths, or a
combination of these, with a layer of metallic armour being provided where
extra mechanical protection is required.
3.2 CABLE TYPE AND SELECTION
To meet various electrical and environmental operating conditions,
multitude types of cable which are available for incorporation in the low-
voltage system are required. Guidance on the selection of types of cables is
given in Chapter 52 and Appendix 4 of the IEE Regulation [Ref. 2], or CP5
[Ref. 4].
The current carrying capacity of a cable must be sufficient to cater for
the maximum sustained current which will normally flow through it. The
insulation must be adequate to deal with the voltages of the system and it
must not be damaged by the heat produced by the current flow, high
ambient temperatures or by heat transferred to it from hot objects.
Voltage drop requirements and short circuit thermal stresses must also be
catered for.
Due to electromagnetic effects, certain types of cable are precluded from
use in specified circumstances. Regulation 521-02 [Ref. 2] forbids the use
of single-core cables having steel armour on a.c. systems.
Environmental conditions may require cables which are capable of operation
in the presence of water or moisture, or when subjected to fire risk, or in
extremes of temperature. It may have to operate under mechanical stress
and vibration. If the environment is such that the cable is subjected to
such hazards, cables should be selected with appropriate insulation and
sheathing materials. The commonly used low-voltage cables are as follows :
♦ Non-armoured pvc-insulated cables installed in conduits and trunking
systems for internal wiring.
Cable and Sizing of Conductors 53
♦ Non-armoured pvc-insulated and pvc-sheathed cables for general
indoor use, particularly in domestic and commercial installations.
♦ Armoured pvc-insulated cables for mains and sub-mains applications
(i.e. utility’s low-voltage circuits buried underground).
♦ Fire resistant cables or mineral insulated metal sheathed cables used
in areas of extreme temperatures or for circuits supplied to fire-
fighting equipment.
♦ Heat, oil and flame retardant (hofr) cables are intended for use in
severe conditions : examples of these are csp (chlorosulphinated
polyethylene) and pcp (polycholoroprene) sheathed cables.
While many relevant factors need to be taken into account, probably the
most significant factor in cable selection and installation is temperature.
Most of the insulating materials and sheath cables are liable to failure in
the presence of excessive temperatures. All wires used in cable making
have a resistance which, when current is passed through it, give rise to
heat. Cable selection, therefore, is primarily related to the size of the
cable that will carry the required current without the temperature of the
surrounding insulation rising above a critical level that will result in the
breakdown of the insulation.
PVC insulated cables to BS 6004 [Ref. 3] for example, are suitable only as
long as the conductor temperature does not exceed 700C, whereas mineral
insulated cables to BS 6207 : 1991 [Ref. 5] fitted with high temperature
terminations can be operated up to 1350C.
Test Voltage on Completed Cable
All completed cables from factory shall be subjected to voltage tests. An
a.c. voltage shall be applied between conductors, and between each
conductor and the sheath which shall be earthed. The voltage shall be
increased gradually and maintained at the full value for 5 minutes without
breakdown of the insulation according to Table 3.1.
Table 3.1 A.C. Testing on Completed Cables
Voltage Rating Test Voltage between
Conductors, V (r.m.s.)
Test Voltage between any
Conductor and Earth, V (r.m.s.)
600/1,000 3,000 3,000
19,00/3,300 10,000 5,800
3,800/6,600 17,000 9,800
6,350/11,000 25,000 14,400
12,700/22,000 -- 30,000
54 Chapter 3
Test Voltage after Installation
Any voltage test after installation should be made with d.c. voltage. The
voltage should be increased gradually to the full value and maintained
continuously for 15 minutes according to Table 3.2. No breakdown should
occur.
Table 3.2 D.C. Testing after Installation
Voltage Rating Test Voltage between
Conductors, V (d.c.)
Test Voltage between any Conductor
and Sheath, V (d.c.)
600/1,000 3,500 3,500
1,900/3,300 10,000 7,000
3,800/6,600 20,000 15,000
6,350/11,000 34,000 25,000
12,700/22,000 - 50,000
Standard Size of Conductor
In the United States of America, the standard cable sizes are expressed in
AWG/MCM. It is rather difficult to get one-to-one equivalent to the
standard sizes expressed in mm2. Table 3.3 is, therefore, provided for
quick reference.
Table 3.3 Standard cross-sections of round copper conductors
ISO AWG/MCM
cross-section, (mm2)
Size
Equivalent cross-section, (mm2)
1.5 16 1.3
2.5 14 2.1
4 12 3.3
6 10 5.3
10 8 8.4
16 6 13.3
25 4 21.2
35 2 33.6
50 0 53.5
70 00 67.4
95 000 85
- 0000 107.2
120 250 MCM 127
150 300 MCM 152
185 350 MCM 177
240 500 MCM 253
300 600 MCM 304
Cable and Sizing of Conductors 55
3.3 CURRENT RATING OF CABLE
The current rating of a cable is determined by a number of factors, namely
♦ Ambient temperature
♦ Maximum allowable conductor temperature
♦ Conductor material
♦ Insulation material
♦ Installation methods
A cable rated at 30 A can also be loaded up to 40 A or 45 A without any
problem except that the conductor’s temperature is increased. The
temperature at which the conductors of a cable are allowed to operate
continuously without damage to the cables and for a reasonable service life,
depends on the insulation material used and the construction of the cable.
For example, pvc insulated cables to BS 6004 [Ref. 3] are suitable for use
where the conductor temperature under normal load conditions does not
exceed 700C. It is not a normal practice for the design engineer to
determine directly the likely operating temperature of a range of cables.
The designer relies therefore, on the tabulated current carrying capacities
( It ) such as those in Appendix 4 of the IEE Regulation [Ref. 2] or CP5
[Ref. 4]. These tabulated values will ensure that excessive temperatures
are not reached. It should, however, be pointed out that the tabulated
current ratings are based upon a given set of conditions :
♦ An ambient temperature of 300C.
♦ The heating effect of adjacent cables is not considered.
♦ The cable is installed in a way that corresponds to the rating table
being used.
♦ There is no surrounding thermal insulation.
Let us define the above conditions as the preferred operating conditions.
Should any of these conditions be changed, the cable rating has to be
adjusted according to the appropriate correction factor. A cable rated at
30 A in one set of conditions may be suitable for carrying only 10 A or 15 A
in other conditions. A cable may be seriously damaged, leading to early
failure, if it is operated for any prolonged period at a temperature higher
than the specified value.
Ambient Temperature Correction Factor (Ca)
Tabulated cable ratings are based upon 300C, as this is the temperature
most commonly experienced in normal occupied premises. However, even in
56 Chapter 3
such buildings, a higher temperature can occur in the vincinity of heating
equipment or other sources of heat. The designer must, in such cases,
apply a suitable correction factor.
For an ambient temperature higher than the specified temperature of
300C, the rate of flow of heat out of the conductor will be lower than that
of the specified condition. This will increase the conductor’s operating
temperature above the value permitted. This means that the current-
carrying capacity of the conductor has to be reduced to compensate for
the reduction in the heat lost from the conductor.
Correction factors for ambient temperature in determining the current-
carrying capacity of a cable are provided in Table 4C1 of IEE Regulation
[Ref. 2] or CP5 [Ref. 4]. For a general purpose, pvc- insulated cable with a
conductor operating temperature of 700C, the correction factors for a
range of ambient temperatures are summarised in Table 3.4.
Table 3.4 Temperature Correction Factors for pvc Cable
Ambient Temperature 0C 25 30 35 40 45 50
Correction Factor Ca 1.03 1.0 0.94 0.87 0.79 0.71
For example, a four-core pvc-insulated cable enclosed in trunking has a
tabulated current capacity of 80 A. If the ambient temperature is 500C,
the current rating is reduced to 80A x 0.71 = 56.8 A. The ambient
temperature refers to the temperature of the cable surrounding media and
does not include the temperature of the equipment. This factor has to be
applied even if only a short length of the cable route is installed in the area
that has a higher ambient temperature.
Grouping Correction Factor (Cg)
Cables installed in the same enclosure or bundled together will get warm
when all are carrying current. Those close to the edges of the enclosures
will be able to release heat outward but will be restricted in losing heat
inwards towards other warm cables. Cables in the centre of the enclosure
may find it difficult to lose heat at all and will thus increase the conductor
temperature. Table 4B1 of IEE regulations [Ref. 2] or CP5 [Ref. 4] gives
correction factors for cables installed in close proximity or bundled
together. Correction factors for groups of more than one circuit of a
single-core cable, or more than one multi-core cable are summarised in
Table 3.5. These correction factors have to be applied to the tabulated
Cable and Sizing of Conductors 57
current-carrying capacities depending upon how the cables or circuits are
grouped.
Table 3.5 Grouping Correction Factor
No. of circuits or multi-core cables 1 2 3 4 5 6
Bunched and clipped direct 1 0.8 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.57
Single layer clipped direct and
touching
1 0.85 0.79 0.75 0.73 0.72
Single layer clipped direct and
Spaced *
1 0.94 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
* spaced by a clearance between adjacent surfaces of at least one cable diameter.
If the conductors are more than twice their overall diameters apart, no
correction factor needs to be applied. However, the factor has to be
applied even if only a short length of cable route is grouped. Thus, it may
be necessary to use a number of separate entries to an enclosure in order
to keep the cables concerned adequately separated so that the grouping
factor need not be applied.
Example 3.1
A heater rated at 230 V, 3 kW is to be installed using twin-with-earth pvc-
insulated and sheathed cable clipped direct in a roof space that has an
ambient temperature of 400C. The circuit is protected by a 15-A MCB.
The cable is bundled with four other twin-and-earth cables for a short
distance as shown in Figure 3.2. Determine the minimum tabulated current
rating of the circuit and the size of the conductor.
15A
MCB
14m, clipped direct
400
C 3 kW
Heater
bundled with four
other circuits
Figure 3.2 Circuit for Example 3.1
Solution
The design current is :
A13
230
3000
=IB =
58 Chapter 3
The current rating of the protective device (IN ) is 15 A. From Table 3.4,
the temperature corrective factor at 400C is :
Ca = 0.87
From Table 3.5, the grouping factor of five circuits is :
Cg = 0.6
The minimum tabulated current rating It, min for the circuit is :
A28.74
0.60.87
15
CC
I
=I
ga
N
mint, =
×
=
×
From Table 4D2A of IEE Regulation [Ref. 2], column 6, a 4 mm2 cable which
has a tabulated current rating of 36 A is selected. It should be noted that
although the design current is only 13 A, a 4 mm2 cable rated at 36 A is
selected. In fact, for the same design current of 13 A under the
preferred operating conditions, a 1 mm2 cable rated at 15A is sufficient.
Example 3.2
Determine the minimum tabulated current rating of a multi-core, pvc-
insulated cable connected to a 3-phase motor rated at 400 V, 15 kW, 0.8
power factor and 90% efficiency. This motor is subjected to frequent
start/stop and is operating at an ambient temperature of 350C as shown in
Figure 3.3.
MCB
4C /Cu/PVC/NA, trunking
35°C
M
15kW
0.8 p.f.
90% Eff.
Figure 3.3 Circuit for Example 3.2
Solution
The design current is :
I =
15 1000
400
B
×
× × ×
=
0 8 0 9 3
30 07
. .
. A
For frequent start/stop, it is suggested that the minimum circuit rating be
selected from 1.25 to 1.4 of IB. Let us select the higher value of 1.4 and
thus the minimum tabulated circuit rating is 1.4 x 30.07 = 42.10 A. To
incorporate temperature correction, the minimum tabulated circuit rating
is :
B
Cable and Sizing of Conductors 59
A44.79
0.94
42.10
=I mint, =
From Table 4D2A of IEE Regulation [Ref. 2], column 5, a 10 mm2 4-core
cable which has a tabulated current rating of 46 A is selected.
Thermal Insulation Correction Factor (Ci)
To reduce the energy cost for heating, ventilation and air-conditioning
(HVAC), many new buildings are now provided with better thermal insulating
material for roofs and cavity walls to reduce the heat loss. As thermal
insulation is designed to limit heat flow, a cable in contact with it will tend
to become warmer than the preferred operation conditions. IEE Regulation
523-04 [Ref. 2] recommends that for a single cable which is likely to be
surrounded by thermally insulating material over a length of 0.5 m, the
thermal correction factor (Ci) is 0.5 times the tabulated current carrying
capacity for that cable clipped direct to a surface (method 1). If the
surrounded length is less than 0.5 m, the correction factor (Ci) can be
higher than 0.5 [Ref. 2, P78], [Ref.4, 99].
Example 3.3
The circuit is the same as that for Example 3.1, except that the cable has
to pass through a thermal insulation area over a length of 2 m. Determine
the minimum tabulated current rating of the circuit and the size of
conductor.
Solution
The minimum tabulated current rating for the circuit is :
A57.47
0.50.60.87
15
CCC
I
=I
iga
N
mint, =
××
=
××
From Table 4D2A of IEE Regulation [Ref. 2], column 6, a twin-core cable of
10 mm2 which has a tabulated current of 63 A is selected.
Examples 3.1 and 3.3 illustrate that for a design current of 13 A, the cable
size has to increase substantially due to three correction factors from 1
mm2 (15 A) to 4 mm2 (36 A) and to 10 mm2 (63 A). Thus, the designer
should, as far as possible, rearrange the cable route, to avoid grouping, high
ambient temperature and thermal insulation area so that no correction
factor needs to apply.
60 Chapter 3
3.4 VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATION
A design engineer must have a working knowledge of voltage drop
calculations, not only to meet the relevant code, but also to ensure that the
voltage applied to the electrical appliances is maintained within proper
limits. Most electrical appliances are designed to operate within a voltage
tolerance of + 10%. The utility supply regulations normally ensure that the
voltage variations at the supply intake are kept within +6% of the declared
nominal voltage. The designer must therefore, ensure that the voltage
drop from the supply intake to the terminals of any appliance does not
exceed 4% of the declared nominal voltage. Thus, all electrical appliances
can be operated safely and be fully functional within their design voltage
tolerance of +10%. IEE Regulation 525-01 [Ref. 2] specifies that the
voltage drop between the origin of the installation and the fixed current-
using equipment should not exceed 4% of the nominal voltage of the supply.
Consideration should be given to both the steady state and transient
conditions. Transient conditions refer mostly to the motor starting period,
and a greater voltage drop may be accepted provided that the voltage
variations should not exceed those specified in the relevant standards or
the equipment manufacturer’s recommendation.
Tabulated Voltage Drop Constant (TVD)
Figure 3.4 shows a voltage drop of 7 V from the sending end to one terminal
of the appliance when the circuit is carrying its rated current IR. This
voltage drop is due to the resistance of 1.4 mΩ for the live conductor. Let
us define this voltage drop in one conductor, one way as the line-to-neutral
voltage drop. We can therefore multiply this line-to-neutral voltage drop
by 2 to obtain the total voltage drop at the terminals of the appliance
under the assumption that in a single phase circuit, the value of resistance
in the neutral conductor is the same as the live conductor. This is usually
true as the conductor’s material, size and length are identical to those of
the live conductor.
The voltage drop in the single-phase circuit as shown in Figure 3.4, can be
written as :
Vdrop = IR (1.4 mΩ x 100 + 1.4 mΩ x 100)
= IR (1.4 mΩ x 2) x 100
= IR (2.8 mΩ) x 100
= IR x TVD x 100
Cable and Sizing of Conductors 61
Appliance230V
IR = 50A
7 V
216 V
1.4mΩ x 100 meters
7 V
Figure 3.4 Illustration for Voltage Drop Calculation
TVD (i.e. 2.8 mΩ) is in fact the tabulated voltage-drop constant that
appeared in the cable tables of Appendix 4 of the IEE Regulation [Ref.2].
This tabulated voltage-drop constant (TVD) is expressed in mΩ per ampere
per metre run (i.e. for a current of 1 A and for a distance of 1 m along the
route taken by the cables). For cables having conductors of 16 mm2 and
lower, as the values of reactance are very much less than the values of
resistance, the inductance can be ignored, and only the values of
(mV/A/m)r are tabulated. For cables having conductors greater than
16mm2, the impedance values (mV/A/m)z are tabulated together with the
resistive component (mV/A/m)r and the reactive component (mV/A/m)x.
To simplify the voltage drop calculation for single-phase circuits, the values
of TVDr and TVDx are so arranged that TVDr is twice the value of the per-
phase cable resistance and TVDx is also twice the value of the per-phase
cable reactance.
For three-phase circuits, the line-to-line voltage is equal to 3 multiplied
by the line-to-neutral voltage. Similarly, the line-to-line voltage drop is also
equal to 3 multiplied by the line-to-neutral voltage drop. Thus, for
three-phase circuits, the values of TVD are also arranged as 3 multiplied
by the values of the per-phase cable resistance and the per-phase cable
reactance.
Voltage Drop Formulae
For most practical cases, the voltage angle difference between the sending
end and the receiving end is almost zero, and the line-to-neutral voltage
drop, [Ref. 6, P 97, P 629] in a circuit, taking into account the per-phase
current ( I ), the power factor (cosθ), and the values of the per-phase
resistance(R) and reactance(X) is :
Vdrop = I R cosθ + IX sinθ
62 Chapter 3
Example 3.4
A 3-phase motor with a full load current of 102A, and a power factor of 0.8
is to be fed by four single-core, pvc-insulated, copper conductor, non-
armoured cables, clipped direct on a non-metallic surface at 75-metre run
as shown in Figure 3.5. Determine the size of conductor if the permissible
voltage drop from the MCB to the motor terminal is 2%.
4 x 1C / Cu/PVC/NA, clipped direct
IFL = 102A 75m
0.8 p.f.M
MCB
Figure 3.5 Circuit for Example 3.4
Solution
Let the design current IB be the motor’s full load current. From Table
4D1A of IEE Regulation [Ref. 2], column 7, a 25 mm2 cable with a current
rating of 104 A is initially selected, and the line-to-line voltage drop is
calculated as :
( )
( )
V400ofor 2.496%V9.983
1000
751020.60.1750.81.5
1000
lengthIsinTVD+cosTVD
=V Br
LLdrop,
=
×××+×
=
××× θθ
The calculated Vdrop, LL is 2.496% that exceeds 2% of 400 V. Thus, the next
higher size of 35 mm2 is selected and Vdrop, LL is re-calculated :
( )
1.88%orV512.7
1000
751026.017.00.8.11
V LL,drop
=
×××+×
=
This calculated voltage drop is 1.88% of 400 V and thus, a 35 mm2 cable is
recommended.
Example 3.5
The circuit is the same as in Example 3.4, except that the full load current
is reduced to 50 A and the cable selected is a 10 mm2 cable for 30-metre
run. Determine the voltage drop.
Solution
For the 10 mm2 cable, as the reactance is very much less than the
resistance, the tabulated reactive component TVDx is zero and the voltage
drop can be calculated as :
Cable and Sizing of Conductors 63
( )
V4.56=
1000
30500.83.8
1000
3050sin0+cosTVD
V r
LLdrop,
×××
=
×××
=
θθ
Another approach of multiplying TVDr by the design current and the cable
length is also acceptable. However, it may lead to a pessimistically higher
calculated value, such as :
V7.5
1000
30508.3
1000
lengthITVD
V Br
LL,drop
=
××
=
××
=
Temperature Correction on Resistive Value
The value of resistance of a conductor is usually given at a conductor
temperature of 200
C in the relevant standards or cable manufacturers. As
the temperature of the conductor increases due to the load current, the
value of resistance will also increase according to the resistance-
temperature coefficient. This coefficient is approximately equal to 0.004
per 0
C at 200
C for both copper and aluminium conductors [Ref. 2, P178].
Based on this coefficient and as shown in Figure 3.6, the value of
resistance will be zero mathematically at a conductor temperature of
−2300
C. Similarly, if the resistance value is given at 700
C, (denoted as Ω70),
the resistance value at 1600
C (Ω160 ) can be calculated by :
1.3
70230
160230
7070160 ×Ω=⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛
+
+
Ω=Ω
Ω
0.004
0-230 -100 160115957020-200
Ω160
Ω115
Ω95
Ω70
Ω20
At 200
C, the resistance
temperature coefficient
is 0.004 per 0
C
0
C
Figure 3.6 Calculation of Resistance Value at Various Temperatures
64 Chapter 3
If the resistance value at a temperature of 200C is given, the resistance at
the other temperatures such as Ω115 or Ω95 can also be calculated as :
1.3
20230
95230
1.38
20230
115230
202095
2020115
×Ω=⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛
+
+
Ω=Ω
×Ω=⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛
+
+
Ω=Ω
Conductor Temperature on Voltage Drop
The resistive value TVDr is based on the resistance of the conductor at
the rated temperature (e.g. 700C for pvc-insulated copper conductor)
corresponding to the conductor carrying its rated current. Thus, if the
design current is significantly less than the rated current of the cable, the
actual value of the resistance will be lower than the tabulated value due to
the lower conductor temperature. In this case, the direct use of TVDr may
lead to pessimistically high-calculated values of voltage drop. As the value
of reactance is not influenced by temperature, the temperature correction
does not apply to the value of reactance.
Example 3.6
A three-phase circuit consisting of 4 x 10mm2 Cu/pvc/non-armoured single-
core cables is selected to feed an electrical appliance which has a design
current of 50 A at 0.8 power factor as shown in Figure 3.7. The circuit
length is 30m and the ambient temperature is 250C. Determine the voltage
drop by taking into consideration a lower conductor temperature.
Figure 3.7 Circuit for Example 3.6
Solution
As the conductor temperature is proportional to the square of the current
passing through the conductor, we can write:
2
t
2
b
rp
a50A
I
I
tt
t-t
=
−
Where t50A is the conductor temperature when carrying a current of 50A,
ta (250
C) is the ambient temperature, tp (700
C) is the conductor rated
Cable and Sizing of Conductors 65
temperature when carrying the tabulated current(It) of 59 A, Ib (50 A) is
the design current and tr (300
C) is the reference ambient temperature.
Thus, the conductor’s actual operating temperature when carrying a current
of 50A, t50A is :
( )
( )
C53.73
3070
59
50
25
tt
I
I
tt
2
2
rp2
t
2
b
a50A
o
=
−+=
−+=
The corrected TVDr at 53.730
C is :
( )
3.594
0.94583.8
70230
53.73230
TVDTVD r53.73r
=
×=
⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛
+
+
=
( )( )
V4.313
1000
30500.83.594
1000
lengthIcosTVD
V
B53.73r
LL,drop
=
×××
=
××
=
θ
The voltage drop of 4.313 V is actually 94.58% of the voltage drop obtained
by directly multiplying the TVDr value. If the design current is 29.5 A
which is half of the conductor rated current (i.e. the cable is 50% loaded),
the conductor temperature at 29.5A will be :
( )
C35
3070
2
1
25t
2
29.5
o
=
−⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛
+=
The corrected TVDr at 350
C is :
( ) rr35r TVD0.88
70230
35230
TVDTVD =⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛
+
+
=
Thus, the actual voltage drop is only 88% of the voltage drop obtained by
directly multiplying the TVDr value.
3.5 PROTECTION AGAINST OVERLOAD
Overload currents may occur in various circuits in an installation. These
overload circuits are electrically sound but are carrying more current than
66 Chapter 3
their rated capacity. These may be caused by a user deliberately or
accidentally using more power than the circuit is designed for, or due to
the design errors in estimating the maximum demand in some sections of
the installation. The consequences of such an overload to the installation
are that the temperature of the conductors and of their insulation will rise
to the level where the effectiveness of the insulation and its expected life
may be reduced. Circuit breakers or fuses are required to automatically
detect overloads and to break the circuit if such overloads exceed a pre-
determined value within a specified duration.
3.5.1 Required Conditions for Overload Protection
To provide an adequate protection for overload, IEE Regulation 433
[Ref. 2], requires the following conditions to be satisfied :
i) IN < IZ
ii) I2 < 1.45 IZ
Where Iz is the current rating of the cable under the particular
installation conditions, IN is the current rating of the protective device
and I2 is the current magnitude causing an effective operation of the
protective device. The effective operating time is defined as 1, 2, 3 or 4
hours. For MCB, I2 is 1.45 IN. For MCCB and ACB, I2 is 1.3 IN. The effective
operating time is 2 hours, except for breakers less than 63 A where the
effective operating time is reduced to 1 hour. If the protective device is a
fuse, I2 is 1.6 IN and the effective operating time is in the range from 1 to
4 hours depending on the current rating of the fuse.
Since one of the prime functions of the protective device is to protect the
cable from being overloaded, its current rating must not be greater than
that of the cable to be protected, i.e. IN < IZ. The factor of 1.45 in
condition (ii) is based on a combination of experience and investigation.
Condition (ii) implies that the current in the circuit is allowed to increase to
145% of the cable rated capacity. In this loading condition, the
temperature of the conductor will be higher than its rated temperature
but is still below its critical temperature. For example, for pvc-insulated
copper conductor cable, the rated conductor temperature is 700C, and the
critical temperature is in the range from 1400C to 1600C. The loading at
145% is about 1140C [Ref. 7, P 83]. The reduction of the factor from 1.45
downwards will result in the reduction of the overload capability of the
circuit or even cause unnecessary tripping on minor overload.
Cable and Sizing of Conductors 67
Table 3.6 gives a sample of various rated conductor temperatures for two
types of cables. It should be noted that operations at the overload
temperature are acceptable provided that such operations shall not exceed
100 hrs per year and such 100-hr period shall not exceed five times [Ref. 6,
P 559]. The critical temperature refers to the temperature that will cause
insulation failure.
Table 3.6 Rated Conductor Temperature
Cable Type Rated Temperature
( 0
C )
Overload
Temperature ( 0
C )
Critical
Temperature ( 0
C )
PVC-insulated 75 95 150
Cross-linked 90 130 250
To assess whether there is an overload protection and how adequate it is,
let us define the degree of overload protection as:
OL_P_Yes ≡ 100% x (1.45 IZ - I2 ) / 1.45 IZ
A positive value of OL_P_Yes implies that the circuit is adequately
protected against overload current, and a higher percentage means that
the circuit is more unlikely to be overloaded. Obviously, a negative
percentage indicates that the circuit is not provided with overload
protection.
Example 3.7
The designed current of a circuit is 49 A and it is fed by a 4 x 10 mm2
single-core copper conductor, pvc-insulated cables installed in trunking.
This circuit is protected by a 50A MCCB as shown in Figure 3.8.
a) Does this circuit satisfy the requirements for overload protection?
b) State the range of small overload that the circuit is not protected.
c) To eliminate the undesired small overload, the circuit is upgraded to
4 x 25 mm2. Can this upgraded circuit be loaded up to 100% of its
rated capacity? Why?
50A
MCCB
4 x 10 mm2
/1C/Cu/PVC/NA, trunking
IB = 49A, IZ = 50A
Figure 3.8 Circuit for Example 3.7
68 Chapter 3
Solution
(a) This circuit satisfies the two overload requirements :
(i) From Table 4D1A of IEE Regulation [Ref. 2],
IZ = 50 A. Since IN = 50 A, it satisfies IN < IZ.
(ii) Since I2 = 1.30 x 50 = 65 A, and
1.45 IZ = 72.5 A, it satisfies I2 < 1.45 Iz.
Thus, according to IEE Regulation 433 [Ref. 2], this circuit is provided with
adequate protection against overload. We may also indicate by :
OL_P_Yes = 100% x (1.45 IZ - I2 ) / 1.45 IZ = 10.3%
(b) In this particular case, there is a range of small overloads for
which it is not protected. Since the breaker will only trip at a current
higher than 65 A and the cable rating is 50 A, the range of unprotected
overload is therefore, from a load current higher than 50 A to less than 65
A.
(c) The current rating of the 4 x 25 mm2 cable is 89 A. As this circuit
is protected by a 50 A MCCB, which will trip at any current higher than 65
A, this circuit can only load up to :
73%100%
89
65
=×
3.5.2 Small Overloads and Cable Utilisation
In Example 3.7, it is illustrated that if the rated cable capacity, Iz is equal
to or slightly higher than the rating of the protective device, IN, it is
possible to have a range of very small overloads which will not be detected
by the protective device (i.e. at the range between IZ ≤ I ≤ I2). This
condition exists even if the circuit is adequately protected against overload
according to the IEE Regulations 433. Thus, in the general statement in
IEE Regulation 433-01-01 [Ref. 2], it states that every circuit shall be
designed so that a small overload of long duration is unlikely to occur.
Similar to the definition of OL_P_Yes, we may define a percentage value to
detect whether such small overload exists:
Sm_OL_No ≡ 100% x (IZ – I2 ) / IZ
Cable and Sizing of Conductors 69
A positive percentage in Sm_OL_No indicates that there is no un-detected
small overload while a negative percentage means that such small overload
range exists. Thus the designer should as far as possible minimize the
negative percentage. Alternatively, the designer can simply increase the
conductor size which will totally eliminate the occurrence of such small
overloads. In fact, in Example 3.7, if the size of the conductor is increased
from 4 x 10 mm2 to 4 x 16 mm2, the range of loading from 50 A to 65 A will
not result in circuit overload since the current rating of the 4 x 16 mm2
circuit is 68A. We may also analyse using Sm_OL_No:
Sm_OL_No10 mm = 100% x (50-65) / 50 = -30%
Sm_OL_No16 mm = 100% x (68-65) / 68 = 4.4%
The margin between IN and IZ should be carefully determined. If the
value of IZ is very close to IN, the un-detected small overloads may occur.
If the value of Iz is much higher than IN, then it implies a larger size of
cable has been selected which will obviously increase the installation cost.
In such arrangements, the cable may not be able to be loaded up to its
rated capacity and thus the cable rating will not be fully utilised.
3.5.3 Omission of Overload Protection
There are some circuits in which a break in current by the operation of
protective devices can cause danger. For example, breaking the current of
a lifting electromagnet could cause it to drop its load, or breaking the
current in a current transformer could induce a very high e.m.f. In such
situations, overload protection can be omitted, and if necessary, it can be
replaced by an overload alarm.
To cater for starting condition in designing a circuit for a motor, the
designer has to ensure that the protective device of the motor circuit will
not trip during motor starting. Thus, if the starting current is large, the
rating of the protective device, IN, may have to be much higher than the
design current, IB. To provide adequate overload protection, the current
rating IZ of the cable has to be equal to or larger than IN. Thus, it will
result in IN I and I IB Z〉〉 〉〉 B. In this arrangement, the size of the circuit
will be larger than necessary. However, if overload protection is not
required, then even if IN BI〉〉 , the designer can select IZ to be
independent of IN, and IZ > IB.
70 Chapter 3
As a circuit for a motor is always connected through a starter with
overload release, any overload in the motor that may occur will always be
interrupted by the built-in overload release. Thus, the protective device of
the motor circuit will not be required to provide overload protection. The
functions of the protective device are not for overload protection but for
switching of the circuit and to provide protection for short circuit that may
occur in the circuit.
If overload protection is required, the minimum tabulated current rating
for the circuit is obtained by :
iga
N
mint,
CCC
I
I
××
=
For motor circuit or any other circuit where overload protection is not
required, the minimum tabulated current rating is [Ref. 2, P59, P177]:
iga
B
mint,
CCC
I
I
××
=
Where the motor is intended for intermitted duty and for frequent
stopping and starting, the conductor size shall be increased from 1.2 to 1.4
of the design current to cater for any cumulative effects of the starting
periods upon the temperature rise in the circuit.
Example 3.8
A motor which has a full load current of 188 A is fed by a multi-core pvc-
insulated copper conductor cable installed in trunking at an ambient
temperature of 350C. This circuit is protected by a MCCB as shown in
Figure 3.9. Due to the high starting current, the current rating of the
MCCB is 350 A. Determine the size of the cable under the assumptions
that
a) overload protection is not required,
b) adequate overload protection should be provided.
350A
MCCB
4C /Cu/PVC, trunking
IFL = 188A, 35°C
DOL
M
Figure 3.9 Circuit for Example 3.8
Solution
(a) For no overload protection, the minimum tabulated current rating is :
Cable and Sizing of Conductors 71
A200
1x194.0
188
CCC
I
I
iga
B
mint,
=
×
=
××
=
From Table 4D2A of IEE Regulations [Ref. 2, P 190], column 5, a
120 mm2/4C cable which has a tabulated current rating of 206 A is
selected.
(b) To provide adequate protection against overload,
A372
110.94
350
CCC
I
I
iga
N
mint,
=
××
=
××
=
From the same Table 4D2A, column 5, a 400 mm2/4C cable which has a
tabulated current rating of 402 A is selected. The current causing
effective operation of the 350A MCCB is :
I2 = 1.30 x 350 = 455 A
1.45 IZ = 1.45 x 402 x 0.94= 548 A
Since I2 < 1.45 IZ, this circuit satisfies the required overload protection.
It should be noted that under this condition, the conductor’s cross-
sectional area of the circuit is increased to more than 3 times to meet the
additional requirement of overload protection.
3.6 PROTECTION AGAINST SHORT CIRCUIT
Calculations are necessary to ensure that the circuit conductors are
protected adequately against the short-circuit current. Not only must the
protective device open the circuit and interrupt the short-circuit current,
it must do so quickly enough to prevent thermal damage to the cable.
3.6.1 Required Conditions for Short Circuit Protection
During fault conditions up to a duration of 5 s, the maximum time in seconds
that the cable can withstand the fault current can be approximated by the
following formula :
2
F
22
max,cable
I
Sk
t =
72 Chapter 3
The maximum time that the cable can withstand, Tcable, max , is also known as
critical time, which is the time taken in seconds for the temperature of the
conductors to rise from the rated value Q1 to the critical value QF. If the
conductor temperature exceeds QF, the insulation material fails and the
whole cable is thermally damaged.
Thus, at the maximum short circuit current, the operating time of the
protective device should be shorter than Tcable, max to isolate the fault
current so that the conductor temperature will not exceed QF. The
constant k represents the maximum thermal capacity of the conductor for
the type of insulation being used, S is the cross-sectional area of the
conductor in mm2 and IF is the prospective short-circuit current in
amperes. For a duration of more than 5 s, a more complicated formula has
to be used. To assess whether short-circuit protection is provided and how
adequate it is, let us define:
SC_P_Yes ≡ 100% x (tcable, max – tbk, 3-phase F ) / tcable, max
where tbk, 3-phase F is the operating time of the breaker corresponding to a
current during a 3-phase fault at the cable. The largest current that may
flow through the cable occurs during a 3-phase fault. A positive percentage
in SC_P_Yes indicates that the circuit meets the requirement for short-
circuit protection and a higher percentage implies a higher margin of short-
circuit protection. Obviously, if SC_P_Yes is a negative value, the circuit is
not protected against short-circuit current.
The value of k is a function of the conductor resistivity and its resistance-
temperature coefficient, heat capacity of the conductor material, the
rated conductor temperature Q1, and the critical temperature QF. Some
typical values of k are given in Table 3.7.
Table 3.7 Values of k for calculation of the effects of fault current
Conductor Insulation Q1, 0
C QF, 0
C k
Copper PVC 70 160 115
PVC * 70 140 103
PVC 30 160 143
PVC * 30 140 133
Rubber 85 220 134
XLPE 90 250 143
Aluminium PVC 70 160 76
PVC 30 160 95
Steel PVC 30 160 52
Bare Copper - 30 200 159
Bare Aluminium - 30 200 105
* for conductors larger than 300 mm2
Cable and Sizing of Conductors 73
Example 3.9
A motor which has a full load current of 45 A, is fed by a four-core 10mm2
copper conductors, pvc-insulated cable installed in trunking and protected
by a 100-A type B MCB which has a shortest operating time of 0.01 s. The
three-phase short-circuit current is 5000 A as shown in Figure 3.10. Does
this circuit provide adequate protection for overload? Does this circuit
provide adequate protection for short-circuit? Why?
100A
MCB
10mm2
/4C /Cu/PVC, trunking
IFL = 45A , IZ = 46A, IF = 5000A
DOL
M
Figure 3.10 Circuit for Example 3.9
Solution
Since IB = 45 A, IN = 100 A, IZ = 46 A (from column 5 Table 4D2A of IEE
Regulation), this circuit does not provide overload protection since IN is not
< IZ and I2 is not < 1.45 IZ.
For pvc-insulated cable, Q1 = 700C, Qf = 1600C and k = 115. To avoid
thermal damage to the cable during fault condition, the MCB must operate
and isolate the short-circuit current within the maximum time that the
cable can withstand as follows :
s0.0529
5000
10115
I
Sk
t 2
22
2
F
22
maxcable, =
×
==
If the operating time of the MCB is specified as 0.01 s that is lower than
the critical time of 0.0529 s, this circuit is therefore adequately protected
for short circuit. Alternatively, we may verify by:
OL_P_Yes = 100% x (66.7 - 145 ) / 66.7 = -117%
SC_P_Yes = 100% x (0.0529 – 0.01 ) / 0.0529 = 81%
The negative value of -117% indicates that the circuit fails for overload
protection but passes the short-circuit protection at a margin of 81%.
Example 3.10
A 4 x 10 mm2 circuit clipped directly on a non-metallic surface is protected
by a 60-A MCCB which has a maximum operating time of 0.15 s as shown in
74 Chapter 3
Figure 3.11. The expected load current is 50 A while the short-circuit
current is 4000 A.
a) Explain why this circuit is not fully protected by overload protection.
State the appropriate modifications to provide adequate overload
protection.
b) Explain why this circuit is not adequately protected against short-
circuit and recommend the necessary remedial solution.
c) If both the conductor size and the breaker operating time remain
unchanged, what is the maximum short-circuit current that this circuit
can withstand?
60A
MCCB
4 x 10 mm2
/1C/Cu/PVC/NA, clipped direct
IB = 50A, IF = 4000A
Figure 3.11 Circuit for Example 3.10
Solution
(a) (i) From Table 4D1A of IEE Regulation, column 7, the current rating of
the 10 mm2 circuit is 59 A. Since IN = 60 A and IZ = 59 A, thus IN is not <
IZ
(ii) Since I2 = 1.30 x 60 = 78 A, and 1.45 IZ = 1.45 x 59 = 86 A, it satisfies
I2 < 1.45 IZ. This circuit is not considered fully protected by overload, as it
does not satisfy condition (i), although it does satisfy condition (ii).
To provide adequate overload protection including small overloads, the
minimum tabulated current rating of the circuit should be :
It,min = 1.3 × 60 = 78A
From table 4D1A of IEE Regulations [Ref. 2, P 188], column 7, the
conductor size should be 4 x 16 mm2 which is rated at 79A.
(b) second0827.0
4000
10115
I
sk
t 2
22
2
22
max,cable =
×
==
Since the maximum operating time of the MCCB is 0.15 s which is larger
than the critical time of 0.0827 s, the circuit does not provide adequate
protection for thermal damage during short-circuit conditions. The
Cable and Sizing of Conductors 75
conductor size should be increased from 10mm2 to a larger cross section as
follows :
2Fphase,-3,bk
min mm47.13
115
15.04000
k
tI
s ===
Thus, if adequate short-circuit protection is required, the conductor size
should be equal to or greater than 13.47 mm2 and thus 16 mm2 is
recommended.
(c) For both the conductor size and the breaker operating time to
remain unchanged, the maximum short-circuit current that this circuit can
withstand is :
A2969
15.0
10115
t
kS
I
Fphase-3,bk
max,F =
×
×=
Current (Amperes)
Time (Seconds)
0.1
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
0.01
100 1,000 10,000
5
Safe
4 mm2
10 mm2
Safe
Figure 3.12 The adiabatic equations
3.6.2 Adiabatic Equation
The value of k is the same for cables that have the same type of conductor
and insulation materials. If the cross-sectional area is also the same, then
76 Chapter 3
the product of k2S2 is a constant in the equation tcable, max = k2S2/I2. This
equation can be rewritten as tcable, max = A1 / I2 where A1 is a constant which
is equal to k2S2. Thus, a straight line known as adiabatic equation can be
constructed on a log-log scale by substituting different values of I into the
equation. The adiabatic equations of the 4 mm2 and 10 mm2 copper
conductor, pvc-insulated cables are shown in Figure 3.12.
Figure 3.13 Region of short-circuit protection
This adiabatic equation can also be referred to as the time-current
characteristic of the cable’s withstand capability. The region to the left of
the adiabatic equation as shown in Figure 3.12 can be considered as a safe
or adequately protected region since any protective device operating in this
region will always cut-off the short-circuit current before the cable
exceeds its thermal limit. The adiabatic equation of a 4 mm2 copper
100 1,000 10,000
0.1
1
100
1,000
10,000
10
0.001
010.
50A
4 mm2
50A
MCB
2 × 4mm Cu / pvc / pvc2
ime (Seconds)
Unprotected region
Protected
region
T
Region that is adequately
protected
Current (Amperes)
Unprotected region
Cable and Sizing of Conductors 77
conductor, pvc-insulated cable is superimposed with the time-current
characteristic of a type 3, 50-A MCB as shown in Figure 3.13.
It should be noted that for fault current from 500 A to 4600 A, the circuit
is adequately protected since the operating time of the breaker is in the
protected region, i.e. the breaker’s operating time is less than the critical
time of the 4 mm2 cable. However, for current in the range from 206 A to
500 A or higher than 4600 A, the cable is not protected since the
breaker’s operating time exceeds the critical time of the cable. For current
below 206 A, the formula given in Section 3.6.1 is not applicable and thus
whether the cable is protected or not is un-defined. If the type 3 MCB is
replaced by a type 1 MCB, will the region of protection cover the range
from 206 A to 500 A? Why?
3.6.3 Formulae for Short-circuit Currents
Three-phase Fault. For 3-phase fault, the current magnitude in each phase
is identical except that the angle is shifted by 1200
in each phase. Thus,
the current in each phase during a 3-phase fault can be calculated by using
an equivalent single phase approach as follows :
( ) ( )22
LL 3V
1S1S
F,3
XXRR
I
+++
=φ
where RS and XS are the per-phase values of the resistance and reactance
of the supply source; R1 and X1 are the per-phase values of the resistance
and reactance of the phase conductor and VLL is the line-to-line voltage.
Line-to Neutral Fault. By using the same single phase approach, the line-to-
neutral short-circuit current can be calculated as follows :
( ) ( )2
n
2
n
LL
LN
X+R+
3V
1S1S
F,
XXRR
I
+++
=
where Rn and Xn are the values of resistance and reactance of the neutral
conductor.
Line-to-Line Fault. For a line-to-line fault, if the effect of the healthy
phase is neglected, the fault current can be calculated as follows :
( ) ( )22
LL
LL
22
V
1S1S
F,
X2XR2R
I
+++
=
78 Chapter 3
The values of the source resistance RS and reactance XS should be
obtained from the supply utility or can be estimated from the impedance of
the incoming transformer. The phase conductor’s resistance, R1 and
reactance, X1, can be referred to the tabulated voltage drop constant,
TVD. If the value of TVD is read from the 2-cable, single phase column, the
value of the resistance can be obtained by multiplying 0.5 to TVDr and the
value of reactance by 0.5 to TVDx. If the value of the TVD is read from
the 3-or-4-cable, three phase column, the multiplication factor 1 3 is
used instead of 0.5. The value of resistance obtained through TVD is
based on a conductor temperature of 700C. During fault condition, the
conductor temperature is higher than 700C and for more accurate
calculation, temperature correction on the resistive value is required. A
typical conductor temperature during fault conditions is normally obtained
by taking the average of the rated conductor temperature Q1, and the
critical conductor temperature OF i.e. (Q1+Qf)/2. If Q1 = 700C, and
Qf = 1600C, the average conductor temperature is 1150C. Thus, the value
of resistance at 1150C is :
Ω Ω Ω115 70 70
230 115
230 70
=
+
+
⎛
⎝
⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟ = × 1.15
Example 3.11
A 400 V, three-phase circuit is fed from a main distribution board where
the source resistance RS is 0.02 Ω and the source reactance XS is 0.06 Ω.
The circuit is run in single-core, non-armoured, pvc-insulated cable having
copper conductors of 95 mm2 at a length of 15 m clipped direct and flat
touching on a non-metallic surface as shown in Figure 3.14. Determine the
three-phase short-circuit current and the line-to-neutral short circuit
current.
4 × 95 mm2
/1C /Cu/PVC, Clipped direct
15mSupplying
Source
Rs = 0.02Ω
Xs = 0.06Ω
Figure 3.14 Circuit for Example 3.11
Solution
From Table 4D1B of IEE Regulation [Ref. 2, P 189] or Table 9D1 of CP5
[Ref. 4] column 8, the tabulated voltage-drop constant for the 95 mm2
cable is (mV/A/m)r = 0.41 mΩ and (mV/A/m)x = 0.23 mΩ. Thus,
Cable and Sizing of Conductors 79
Ω=×
×
Ω=××
×
=
−
−
00199.010
3
150.23
=X
C115at0041.015.110
3
1541.0
R
3
1
3
1
o
The three-phase short-circuit current is :
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
°∠==
+++
=
+++
=
69-A2.3474
0665.0
9.230
00199.006.00041.002.0
3400
XXRR
3V
I
22
2
1S
2
1S
LL
phase3,F
The line-to-neutral short-circuit current is :
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
°∠==
×++×+
=
+++++
=
66-A3303
0699.0
9.230
200199.006.020041.002.0
3400
XXXRRR
3V
I
22
2
n1S
2
n1S
LL
LN,F
3.7 REFERENCES
[1] BS 6346 : 1989, “PVC-insulated Cables for Electricity Supply”,
British Standard Institution, 1989.
[2] “Regulations for Electrical Installations”, 16th Edition, IEE, 1991.
[3] BS 6004 : 1991, “PVC-insulated cables (non-armoured) for Electric
Power and Lighting”, British Standard Institution, 1991.
[4] CP5 : 1998, “Code of Practice for Electrical Installations”, Singapore
Productivity and Standards Board, 1998
[5] BS 6207 : 1991, “Mineral-insulated Copper-sheaths Cables with
Copper Conductors”, British Standard Institution, 1991.
[6] IEEE Standard 141-1993, “IEEE Recommended Practice for Electric
Power Distribution for Industrial Plants”, IEEE, 1993.
[7] Marks T E, “Electrical Distribution in Buildings”, 2nd Edition,
Blackwell Scientific Publications, UK, 1993.
80
CHAPTER 4
EARTHING AND
EARTH FAULT PROTECTION
The earth is a huge conductor which can be considered to be at reference
or zero potential. Human beings are normally in direct contact with this
earth. Any metal parts which become charged with respect to earth may
cause a hazard or ‘electric shock’ if touched by a human body. The purpose
of earthing is to link together all metalwork, except the live conductor, to
the earth potential so that there is no excessive potential differences,
either between different metal parts or between any metal parts and
earth.
In a three-phase a.c. system, the best way to obtain the system neutral for
earthing purposes is to use generators or source transformers with Y-
connected windings. The neutral is readily available for connection to earth
and the earth fault current can then return to this system neutral or
system earth. If such a system neutral is not available in the delta-
connected system, earthing transformers may be used to obtain the
neutral.
4.1 EARTHING IN A UTILITY SYSTEM
Figure 4.1 shows the earthing arrangements in a typical 230-kV and 66-kV
transmission system. In the 230-kV system, it is a solidly earthed system.
The system earthing is implemented at the generating station C through
the 13.2/230-kV generator step-up transformers and also at various
locations in the main substations through the 230/66-kV transformers.
Each generator step-up transformer has a delta-earthed wye connection
and each 230/66-kV transformer has a earthed wye-delta-resistance
earthed wye connection. Thus, during an earth fault in the 230-kV
network, the fault current will have to return to the neutral of the 230-kV
system at either the high-tension (HT) side of the generator step-up
transformers or the HT side of the main 230/66-kV transformers. In this
arrangement, the earth fault current will return to more than one location
depending on the number of source transformers operated in parallel.
Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 81
Figure 4.1 Transmission system earthing
In the 66-kV system, it is earthed through a 19.5 Ω resistor at either the
low-tension (LT) side of one 230/66-kV transformer at each main
substation and/or the HT side of the 11/66-kV generator step-up
transformers at the generating stations A and B. The connection of the 66-
kV network through the 19.5 Ω resistor to earth will limit the earth-fault
current to within 2000 A per source transformer, ie. :
A1954
5.19
3/)1000x66(
IEF ==
Local Distribution
System (LDS)
19.5Ω19.5Ω
19.5Ω19.5Ω
LDS
Generating Station C
Generating
Station B 66 kV
66 kV
230 kV
230 kV
Main
Substation A
Generating
Station A 66 kV
66 kV
230 kV
inMa
Substation B
LDS
LDS
LDS
: open
: close
82 Chapter 4
To limit the earth fault current, it is a normal practice to earth through
only one 19.5 Ω resistor within each generating station and also only one
19.5 Ω resistor within each main 230/66-kV substation, although there may
be several 230/66-kV transformers operated in parallel within each main
substation. If the main substation A is interconnected with generating
station B, during an earth fault in the 66-kV network, the earth fault
current will return to the neutral of the 66-kV system through one 19.5 Ω
resistor at generating station B and another 19.5 Ω resistor at the main
substation A. In this case, the earth fault current will be limited to 4000
A as there are two 19.5Ω resistors operating in parallel.
Figure 4.2 shows the earthing arrangement in a typical 22-kV distribution
system. The neutral of the 22-kV system is earthed through one 6.5 Ω
resistor at the 22-kV side of each 66/22-kV transformer. Each 66/22-kV
distribution transformer is at an unearthed wye-delta-resistance earthed
wye connection. Thus, during an earth fault in the 22-kV system, the earth-
fault current will return through the resistance-earthed neutral. The
connection of the 22-kV neutral through the 6.5 Ω resistor to earth will
also limit the earth fault current to within 2000 A per source transformer:
( ) A1954
5.6
3100022
IEF =
×
=
The 66/22-kV transformers are generally operated with two transformers
in parallel at each substation. Thus the maximum earth fault current under
this operating condition will be 4000 A, since there are two 6.5-Ω resistors
operating in parallel. At substations C, D and E, the 22/0.4-kV transformer
is at a delta-earthed wye connection. Thus, during an earth fault in the
low-voltage (LV) system, the earth fault current will return to the
respective earthed neutral. As the neutral is solidly earthed, the earth
fault current in each LV system will be considerably higher.
It should be noted that by properly arranging the earthing system at each
voltage level, the magnitude of the earth-fault current can be controlled to
an acceptable level. Furthermore, the earth fault currents at various
voltage levels would never ‘mix-up’ and they can always find their own paths
and return to their designated ‘homes’ (i.e. their respective earthing
neutrals). Thus, it makes sensitive and high-speed earth-fault protection
possible based on the detection of the earth-current flow.
Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 83
4.2 METHODS OF SYSTEM EARTHING
An electric system can also be designed as an unearthed system, i.e. with
the neutral of the system isolated from earth. During a line-to-earth fault,
as the neutral of the system is unearthed, no fault current will flow from
the system. The advantage of such an unearthed system is its ability to
continue operations during a line-to-ground fault. It will not result in the
automatic tripping of the circuit. Thus, the unearthed system offers an
added degree of service continuity.
E
C
A
LV
22 kV
22 kV
22 kV
66 kV
Distribution Substation A
6.5Ω
LV
LV
D
B
22 kV
22 kV
66 kV
Distribution Substation B
6.5Ω
LV
LV
: open
: close
Figure 4.2 Distribution system earthing
However, as the system is unearthed and no fault current flows during a
line-to-ground fault, the faulty phase will then take the earth voltage. As a
result, the magnitude of the voltage between each healthy line to earth is
equal to the line-to-line voltage. This causes a rise in voltage on the other
two healthy phases of approximately 3 of the voltage between each
84 Chapter 4
phase to ground. In other words, the other two phase conductors
throughout the entire system are subjected to 73% overvoltage. This
additional voltage stress may produce insulation breakdown in the circuits,
especially machine windings and other voltage sensitive equipment.
Furthermore, due to the capacitance effect from the two healthy phases
to ground, a capacitive current will flow from these two phases through
their insulation to ground and return to the system neutral by way of the
fault. This is, in fact, similar to a capacitance grounded system and it may
have an intermittent arcing at the faulty location. As a result, the
ungrounded system is subjected to a transient overvoltage which may cause
a further fault to occur. Thus, most of the electrical systems employ some
methods of earthing the system neutral at one or more points. The common
methods are resistance earthing, reactance earthing or solid earthing [Ref
1].
Singapore’s practice requires that one point of every system shall be
earthed. This requirement is designed primarily to preserve the security
of the system by ensuring that the potential on each conductor is
restricted to such a value as is consistent with the level of insulation
applied. From the safety point of view, it is equally important that earthing
should ensure efficient and fast operation of protective gears in the case
of earth faults [Ref 2, P 11].
Resistance - Earthed Systems
In a resistance-earthed system, the system neutral is connected to earth
through one or more resistors. In this method, the resistance is actually in
parallel with the system-to-ground capacitive reactance. The value of the
resistance should be selected in such a way that this parallel circuit
behaves more like a resistor than a capacitor.
Resistance earthing can be of high-resistance earthing or low-resistance
earthing depending on the magnitude of the earth-fault current permitted
to flow. Both methods are designed to limit the transient overvoltages due
to the effect of the capacitive earthing during a line-to-earth short-
circuit. In the high-resistance earthing, the earth fault current is limited
to 5 A and it may not require the immediate clearing of a ground fault. For
low resistance earthing, the earth fault current is in the range from 100 A
to 2000 A. Due to the low resistance value, the line-to-earth voltage can
be better controlled and sufficient earth fault current is available to
operate the earth fault relay selectively.
Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 85
Reactance - Earthed Systems
In a reactance-earthed system, the system neutral is connected to earth
through a reactor. In terms of reducing the transient overvoltage, it is not
as effective as resistance earthing. Thus, a reactance earthing system is
not ordinarily employed in industrial power systems.
Solidly Earthed Systems
A solidly earthed system refers to the connection of the neutral of a
generator or transformer directly to earth. Thus, it totally eliminates the
overvoltage in the two healthy phases during a line-to-ground fault.
However, it will result in the highest magnitudes of earth-fault current.
Although each earthing system has its own advantages, solidly earthed
systems are used extensively at all operating voltages.
4.3 EARTHING IN LOW-VOLTAGE SYSTEMS
For low-voltage system earthing, IEE Regulations [Ref 3] define an
electrical system as consisting of a single source of supply and an
installation. System earthing refers to the earthing arrangement at the
source of energy and at the installation. There are five types of earthing
systems classified by a combination of two to four letters namely TT, TN-
S, TN-C, TN-C-S and IT. The first letter indicates the supply earthing
arrangement:
T: Earth, i.e. one or more points of the supply are directly connected to
earth. The letter T is abbreviated from the French word Terre,
which means earth.
I: Impedance, i.e. supply system is not earthed, or one point is earthed
through a fault-limiting impedance.
The second letter indicates the installation earthing arrangement:
T: Earth, i.e. exposed conductive parts connected directly to earth.
N: Neutral, i.e. exposed conductive part connected directly to the
neutral point of the source of supply.
The optional third or fourth letter indicates the earthing conductor
arrangement:
S: Separate, i.e. separate neutral and protective conductors.
C: Combined, i.e. neutral and protective conductor combined in a single
conductor.
86 Chapter 4
4.3.1 Installation Earthing
All metalwork of an electrical installation, other than parts which are
normally live, should be connected to a main earthing terminal. The main
earthing terminal shall be connected to earth by an appropriate earthing
method [Ref 3, P 92]. Effective earthing of each exposed-conductive-part
of the installation is essential for protection against electric shock. This
type of earthing should be arranged to meet the following two objectives :
(a) to maintain, as close as practicable, the exposed-conductive-parts at
earth potential.
(b) to ensure that any earth fault current will be returned safely to its
source via a properly designed low-impedance path.
The earthing arrangements shall be co-ordinated so that during an earth
fault, the voltages between simultaneously accessible exposed-conductive-
parts and extraneous-conductive-parts occurring anywhere in the
installation shall be of such magnitude and duration as not to cause danger
[Ref 2, P 35]. A typical earthing arrangement of an installation is shown in
Figure 4.3.
Exposed-Conductive-Part
The exposed-conductive-part refers to any metallic part of electrical
equipment which can be touched and which is not a live part but may
become live under fault conditions. These include the metallic enclosures
of Class I current-using equipment, metallic cable sheaths, cable trays,
trunkings and metallic conduits. Class I equipment refers to those
equipment in which protection against electric shock does not rely on basic
insulation only, but which includes means for the connection of exposed-
conductive-parts to a protective conductor.
Extraneous-Conductive-Part
The extraneous-conductive-part is a conductive part liable to introduce a
potential, generally earth potential and not forming part of the electrical
installation. It includes non-electrical service pipes and ducting, such as
water pipes, HVAC ducting, exposed metallic structural parts in buildings,
and lightning protection system. It is quite likely that a person could be in
simultaneous contact with an exposed-conductive-part (which may be made
live by an earth fault) and a nearby extraneous-conductive-part.
Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 87
Figure 4.3 Earthing arrangement of an Installation
Circuit Protective Conductor
A circuit protective conductor (CPC) is usually known as earth continuity
conductor or ‘earth wire’ which connects the exposed-conductive-parts of
the current-using equipment to the respective distribution boards and from
each distribution board to the main earthing terminal of an installation as
shown in Figure 4.3. CPC forms part of the earth fault loop impedance and
M
DB Earthing
Terminal
Earth Electrode
Earthing Conductor
Switchboard
Earthing
Terminal
Main Earthing
Terminal
Exposed-
Conductive-
Part
CPC
CPC
CPC
CPC
Extraneous-conductive-part
Main
Equipotential
Bonding
Conductor
88 Chapter 4
will carry the earth fault current in the event of an earth fault. The cross-
sectional area of every protective conductor, other than an equipotential
bonding conductor, shall be calculated in accordance with the following
formula [Ref. 3, P 94], [Ref. 8, P 119] :
k
tI
S
Iefbk,EF
≥
where : S is the minimum cross-sectional area of the protective conductor
in mm2, IEF is the earth fault current in amperes, tbk,Ief is the operating
time of the protective device in seconds corresponding to the earth fault
current IEF and k is the thermal capacity constant of the CPC. The values
of k are given in Section 3.6.
Alternatively, the size of CPC can also be determined based on the size of
the phase conductor in accordance with Table 4.1[Ref.3, P97].
Table 4.1 Size of CPC in Relation to the Size of Phase Conductor
Phase conductor size (S), mm2
Minimum CPC size, mm2
S ≤ 16 S
16 < S ≤ 35 16
S > 35 S / 2
Equipotential Bonding Conductor
Bonding refers to tying together the exposed-conductive-parts and the
extraneous-conductive-parts. It is vital in order to minimise any potential
differences that might exist between them during an earth-fault. The
main equipotential bonding conductor refers to the conductor connecting
from the extraneous-conductive-part to the main earthing terminal to
create an earthed equipotential zone.
4.3.2 TT System
In the TT system, the source of supply is directly earthed (T) and the the
installation’s earthing terminal, which is connected to the exposed-
conductive-parts, is also directly earthed (T) through its own earth
electrode. The earthing at the source of supply is independent of the
earthing at the installation. This arrangement is shown in Figure 4.4. The
main feature of this system is that there is no continuous metallic path
between the exposed-conductive-parts and the neutral of the source. The
earth-fault current flows via two earth electrodes and the mass of the
earth. The earth fault current is :
Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 89
TTEFL,
LL
ABCPC1ES
LL
TTEF,
Z
3V
RRRRZZ
3V
I =
+++++
=
Where : Zs is the source impedance (i.e. RS + jXS ), ZE is the phase
conductor impedance external to the installation (i.e. RE +jXE.), R1 is the
phase conductor resistance of the installation, RCPC is the resistance of the
circuit protective conductor, and RB and RB
A are the resistances of the
earthing conductor and the earth electrode at the installation and at the
source of supply respectively. ZEFL,TT is the earth fault loop impedance in
the TT system:
ZEFL,TT = (RS +RE + R1 +RCPC + RB +RB
A ) +j(XS +XE)
Main
Equipotential
Bonding
Conductor
Extraneous-conductive-part
Rcpc
Exposed-
Conductive-
Part
Installation
Earthing
Terminal
Supply
Earthing
Terminal
earth
R1
RB
RA
ZS
ZE
earth
Figure 4.4 TT System
As shown in Figure 4.4, at the installation’s earthing terminal, the exposed-
conductive-parts and the extraneous-conductive-parts are connected
together to provide an equipotential reference. Thus, during an earth
fault, the voltage at the exposed-conductive-parts, with respect to earth
(usually known as touch voltage or shock voltage), is:
Vshock, TT,Yes = IEF,TT x RCPC
If, however, an equipotential zone is not created, i.e. without the main
equipotential bonding, the touch voltage is:
Vshock, TT,No = IEF,TT x (RCPC + RB)
90 Chapter 4
Obviously, the shock voltage without the equipotential zone, Vshock, TT,No, is
much higher than the shock voltage with the equipotential zone Vshock,TT,Yes.
4.3.3 TN-S System
In the TN-S system, the source of supply is directly earthed (T) and the
exposed-conductive-parts connected to the installation’s earthing terminal
is earthed at the neutral point (N) of the supply source through a separate
(S) protective conductor as shown in Figure 4.5. The main feature of this
system is that there is a continuous metallic path from the exposed-
conductive-part to the neutral of the source and therefore, it usually
results in a higher earth fault current. The earth fault current is also high
enough to operate overcurrent protective devices. The earth fault current
can be calculated by :
TN,EFL
LL
pccpc1ES
LL
TN,EF
Z
3V
ZZZZZ
3V
I =
++++
=
where Z1, ZCPC and ZPC are the impedances of the phase conductor, the CPC,
and the protective conductor respectively. The impedance of the protective
conductor depends on the distance from the installation to the source of
supply, but in general, ZEFL,TN is very much lower than ZEFL,TT mainly due to
the values of RA and RB associated with the TT system. As a result, the
earth fault current in a TN system will be much higher.
B
Main
Equipotential
Bonding
Conductor
Extraneous-conductive-part
Exposed-
Conductive-
Part
Supply
Earthing
Terminal
Installation
Earthing
Terminal
earth
Zcpc
Zpc
Z1
RA
ZS
ZE
earth
Figure 4.5 TN-S system
Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 91
The shock voltages in the TN system with and without equipotential bonding
are:
Vshock,TN,Yes = IEF,TN x ZCPC
Vshock,TN,No = IEF,TN x (ZCPC + ZPC) for sustained fault, or
= Ia x (ZCPC + ZPC) if the breaker trips at a current of Ia)
4.3.4 TN-C-S System
The TN-C-S system is similar to the TN-S system, i.e. the source of supply
is earthed (T) and the installation’s earthing terminal is earthed at the
neutral point (N) of the supply source. However, the separate (S)
protective conductor is subsequently combined (C) with the neutral
conductor at the installation’s incoming supply terminal as shown in Figure
4.6. However, this type of system is not implemented in Singapore.
earth
Installation
Earthing
Terminal
RA
CPC
RPCN
ZS
ZE
R1
Figure 4.6 TN-C-S System
4.3.5 TN-C and IT Systems
TN-C system is similar to the TN-S system except that the separate
protective conductor that connects the installation’s earthing terminal to
the source’s neutral (N) is combined (C) with neutral conductor. In this
system, RCCBs cannot be used as they will not detect an earth fault. TN-C
system is also not implemented in Singapore.
92 Chapter 4
An IT system is normally not permitted on the low-voltage systems. The
source of supply is either completely isolated (I) from earth, or is earthed
through a high impedance. However, the installation’s earthing terminal is
directly earthed (T) through its own electrode. The IT system is also not
implemented in Singapore.
4.4 EARTH FAULT PROTECTION
The earth fault protection for low-voltage systems is based on the
protection against indirect contact for electric shock. It is dependent on
the protection by earthed equipotential bonding and automatic
disconnection of supply as stated in IEE Regulation 413-02 [Ref 3, P 31].
The disconnection of supply applies to any circuit including distribution
circuits and final circuits in which an earth fault may occur. The
characteristics of each protective device, the earthing arrangements and
the relevant impedance of the circuit shall be co-ordinated so that during
an earth fault, the touch voltage (i.e. the potential differences between
simultaneously accessible exposed and extraneous-conductive-parts)
occurring anywhere in the installation shall be of such magnitude and
duration as not to cause danger[Ref. 2, P35].
The human body is composed largely of water and has very low resistance.
The skin, however, if it is not wet or burnt, has a much higher resistance.
Thus, most of the resistance to the passage of current through the body is
at the points of entry and exit through the skin. The average values of
body impedance are in the range from 1000 to 3000 ohms. [Ref. 4, P19].
Based on an average human impedance of 2000 ohms, the current that
passes through the human body is 115 mA for a touch voltage of 230 V, or
25 mA for a touch voltage of 50 V. As reported by IEC [Ref. 4, P39], for an
a.c. current from 15 to 100 Hz, the human body can withstand 30 mA for
5 s or 100 mA for 0.5 s. Thus, the criterion in determining the
disconnection time of protective devices for protection against electric
shock is usually based on a touch voltage of 230 V for 0.4 s or 50V for 5 s.
4.4.1 Protection on TN System
According to IEE Regulations 413-02-06 to 413-02-17 [Ref. 3, P31], for an
installation which is part of a TN system, each exposed-conductive-part
shall be connected to the main earthing terminal which shall be connected
to the earth point of the supply source. One or both of the following two
types of protective devices shall be used : (a) an overcurrent protective
device, (b) a residual current device.
Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 93
Protection Provided by an Overcurrent Device
During an earth fault, the characteristics of each protective device and the
earth fault loop impedance, ZEFL,TN, of each circuit protected by it should
be such that automatic disconnection of the supply will occur within a
specified time and should satisfy :
a
LL
TN,EFL
I
3V
Z ≤
where : ZEFL,TN is the earth fault loop impedance, VLL / 3 is the rated line-
to-earth voltage and Ia is the current causing the automatic operation of
the protective device within the specified time.
(i) Hand-held equipment at 0.4 s. For final circuit which supplies socket
outlets or hand-held Class I equipment (defined in the sub-heading:
exposed-conductive-parts in Section 4.3.1), the maximum disconnection
time should be specified according to the rated line-to-earth voltage as
shown in Table 4.2 [Ref. 3, P 32].
Table 4.2 Disconnection Time for TN Systems
Voltage (V) Time in seconds
220 - 277 0.4
400 0.2
>400 0.1
The maximum earth fault loop impedances corresponding to a list of
overcurrent protective devices which can achieve the required
disconnection time of 0.4 s are stated in Tables 41B1 and 41B2 of the IEE
Wiring Regulations [Ref 3, P 33]. The impedances, ZEFL,TN,MAX, in these
tables are obtained by :
s0.4atoperatedcurrentEffective
Voltageearth-to-lineRated
Z max,TN,EFL =
For example, if the overcurrent protective device is a 32-A type C MCB,
the operating time is 5 s for a current less than 320 A and 0.04 s for any
current equal to or greater than 320 A. Thus, the current causing the MCB
to operate at 0.4 s is 320 A and the corresponding maximum earth fault
loop impedance is :
Ω== 75.0
320
240
Z C,MCB,A32max,,TN,EFL
The value of 0.75 Ω is identical to those listed in Table 41B2(h) of IEE
Regulations [Ref. 3, P 33]. For MCBs, as they are operated by the
94 Chapter 4
electromagnetic tripping, the operating time is in the range from 0.01 s to
0.1 s, although the required operating time is 0.4 s.
If the rated line-to-earth voltage is 230 V, then
Ω== 719.0
320
230
Z C,MCB,A32max,,TN,EFL
(ii) Fixed equipment at 5 s. For a distribution circuit, or a final circuit
supplying only stationary equipment, a disconnection time not exceeding 5 s
is permitted. [Ref 3, P 35]
(iii) Optional disconnection time at 5 s. Irrespective of the value of the
line-to-earth voltage for a final circuit which supplies a socket-outlet or
portable hand-held class I equipment, and which is within the earthed
equipotential zone, the disconnection time is permissible to increase to a
value not exceeding 5 s, if the impedance of CPC is less than a value given in
Table 41C of the IEE Regulations [Ref 3, P 34]. The maximum impedances
of the CPC corresponding to a list of overcurrent protective devices listed
in Table 41C are obtained by :
5satoperatedcurrentEffective
V50
Z ,maxTN,CPC =
If the overcurrent protective device is a 32-A BS 88 fuse and the current
causing the fuse to operate at 5 s is 125 A, the maximum impedance allowed
of the CPC is :
Ω== 40.0
125
V50
Z fuse,A32max,,TN,CPC
If the overcurrent protective device is a 32-A type 3 or type C MCB, and
the current causing the MCB to operate at 5 s is 320 A, the maximum
impedance allowed for the CPC is :
Ω== 16.0
320
50
Z C,MCB,A32max,,TN,CPC
The values of 0.4 Ω and 0.16 Ω are identical to those values listed in Table
41C (a) and (h) of IEE Regulations [Ref. 3, P 34, 35] respectively.
Protection Provided by a Residual Current Device
If the protection is provided by a RCCB, the following condition shall be
satisfied :
ZEFL,TN x IΔN ≤ 50 V
Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 95
where : ZEFL,TN is the earth fault loop impedance and I∇N is the rated
residual operating current of the RCCB in amperes.
4.4.2 Protection on TT System
According to IEE Regulation 413-02-18 to 413-02-20, for an installation
which is part of a TT system, every exposed-conductive-part shall be
connected via the main earthing terminal to a common earth electrode. One
or both of the following protective devices shall be used: (a) a residual
current device, (b) an overcurrent protective device.
In the TT system, the earth fault loop impedance is usually higher than the
TN system and thus, the earth fault current may not be high enough to
operate the overcurrent protective device in time to disconnect the circuit.
Thus, in this system, the use of RCCB is preferred. In addition, the shock
voltage shall be limited to not more than 50 V by satisfying the following
conditions :
RaIa < 50 V
where : Ra is the sum of the resistances of the earth electrode, earthing
conductor and the CPC connecting to the exposed-conductive-part. Ia is the
current causing the automatic operation of the protective device within 5 s.
If the protective device is a RCCB, Ia is the rated residual operating
current IΔN.
As the value of Ra includes the resistance of the earthing conductor and
the earth electrode ( RB), the calculated touch voltage is actually based on
an installation without the main equipotential bonding. The shock voltage is
calculated by :
B
Vshock,TT,No = Ia,TT × Ra = Ia,TT × (RCPC + RB)B
If the main equipotential bonding has been installed, the shock voltage is:
Vshock,TT,Yes = Ia,TT × (RCPC), or
= IEF,TT × (RCPC) if protective device does not operate
It is obvious that Vshock,TT,Yes < Vshock,TT,No and thus, the shock voltage will be
lower than 50 V if the calculation is based on Vshock,TT,No. However, it should
be noted that although the value of RCPC is always within 1 Ω [Ref. 2, P 43],
the earth electrode resistance may be as high as 5 Ω for most locations
[Ref. 5, P 28]. A detailed calculation of earth fault current and shock
voltage [Ref. 7] using a full three-phase representation for both TT and
TN-S systems are given in Appendix C.
96 Chapter 4
4.5 APPLICATION EXAMPLES
Example 4.1
In part of a TN-S system, the supply to a final DB is fed from a 22/0.4 kV
transformer via a main DB as shown in Figure 4.7. The main circuit from
the transformer to the main DB is a multicore, pvc-insulated, copper
conductor cable of 120 mm2
with a separate protective conductor of 70
mm2
, pvc-insulated copper conductor cable. The sub-circuit from the main
DB to the final DB is a twin-core, pvc-insulated, copper conductor cable of
35 mm2
with a separate CPC of 6 mm2
, pvc-insulated copper conductor
cable. The transformer has a resistance of 0.002 Ω and a reactance of
0.008 Ω with respect to the voltage of 400V. During fault condition, it is
assumed that the temperatures of the 35 mm2
phase conductor and the 6
mm2
CPC are 1150
C and 950
C respectively, and that the 120 mm2
phase
conductor and the 70 mm2
CPC are 700
C and 300
C respectively.
(a) Determine the earth fault loop impedance at the final DB and the
earth fault current for a line-to-earth short circuit inside the final
DB.
(b) Is the CPC size of 6 mm2 appropriate? Why?
200A
Main
DB
MCCB
(main circuit) (sub-circuit)
Cu/PVC, tray, 30m
120mm2
/4C + 70mm2
(CPC)
XT = 0.008Ω
RT = 0.002Ω
Cu/PVC, trunking, 20m
35mm2
/ 2C+ 6mm2
(CPC)
Final
DB
Figure 4.7 Installation for Example 4.1
Solution
(a) From Table 4D2B(columns 3, 4) of IEE Regulations [Ref. 3, P 191]:
120 mm2 : (mV/A/m)r = 0.33 mΩ, (mV/A/m)x = 0.135 mΩ
70 mm2 : (mV/A/m)r=0.63 mΩ, (mV/A/m)x = 0.160 mΩ
35 mm2 : (mV/A/m)r = 1.25 mΩ, (mV/A/m)x = 0.165 mΩ
6 mm2 : (mV/A/m)r = 7.3 mΩ, (mV/A/m)x = 0 Ω
Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 97
0=X0.079=
70)+1000(2302
95)+20(2307.3
=R
0.0017=
10002
200.165
=X0.0144=
70)+1000(2302
115)+20(2301.25
=R
0.0024=
10002
300.16
=X
0.0082
70)+1000(2302
30)+30(2300.63
R
0.0023
10003
300.135
=X0.0057
10003
300.33
R
66
3535
70
70
120120
Ω
×
×
Ω
×
×
Ω
×
×
Ω
×
×
Ω=
×
×
=
Ω=
×
×
Ω=
×
×
=
Ω=
++++++++=
0.1102
)XXX(X)RRRR(RZ 2
T3570120
2
T63570120TNEFL,
The line-to-earth short-circuit current is :
A2087
1102.0
230
I TN,EF ==
(b) For an earth fault current of 2087 A, the operating time of the MCB in
the final DB is estimated at 0.1 s . Thus the minimum size of CPC is:
2
22
TN,EF
min mm62.4
143
1.02087
k
tI
S =
×
=≥
The CPC size of 6 mm2 is appropriate since it is greater than the minimum
required size of 4.62 mm2.
Example 4.2
An installation which is part of a TT system has a final circuit with a length
of 20 m for socket-outlets. This circuit is a single-core, pvc-insulated
copper conductor cable of 4 mm2 with a separate CPC of the same size as
shown in Figure 4.8. The CPC from the final DB to the main earthing
terminal is 16 mm2 at 30 m and the earthing conductor from the earthing
terminal to the earth electrode is 25 mm2 at 10 m. All the CPCs are single-
core pvc-insulated copper conductors and the earth electrode resistance is
0.9 Ω. The protective device for the final circuit can be selected from a
32-A type 1 MCB, a 32-A type C MCB or a 63-A RCCB with a residual
operating current of 0.03 A. Temperature correction on cable resistive
value is not required.
(a) To satisfy the protection for electric shock, suggest the appropriate
type of protective devices for the final circuit to the socket outlets.
98 Chapter 4
(b) State the differences if the same installation is part of a TN-S system
in which the external earth fault loop impedance RE + jXE from the final DB
and the earthing terminal to the source of supply is (0.3 +j0.6) Ω.
32A
MCB
1x25mm2
Cu/PVC, clipped direct
to Socket-outlets
1x16mm2
Cu/PVC
trunking, 20m
1x4mm2
Cu/PVC (CPC)2x4mm2
Cu/PVC,
63A
clipped direct, 30m 10m
CPC
Earth
Electrode
RB = 0.9Ω
Earthing conductor
Final DB
Earthing
Terminal
RCCB
Figure 4.8 Installation for Example 4.2
Solution
(a) From Table 4D1B (columns 3,4) of IEE Regulations [Ref. 3, P 189],
4 mm2 : (mV/A/m)r = 11 mΩ
16 mm2 : (mV/A/m)r = 2.8 mΩ
25 mm2 : (mV/A/m)r = 1.75 mΩ
ΩΩ=
×
×
=
Ω=
×
×
=
=Ω=
×
×
=
0.9=R0.009
10002
101.75
R
0.042
10002
302.8
R
RR0.11
10002
2011
R
B25
cpc,16
4CPC4,4
For TT system, the condition to satisfy the requirement for the protection
against electric shock is to limit the shock voltage to not more than 50 V as
follows :
Ra Ia < 50 V
Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 99
where Ia is the current causing the automatic operation of the protection
device within 5 s.
Ra = R4,cpc + R16,cpc + R25 + RB = 1.061 ΩB
A1.47
061.1
50
Ia ==
The operating times of the 32-A MCB for both type 1 and type C are 1000 s
for a current of 47.1 A. As this disconnection time exceeds 5 s, both type 1
and type C MCBs do not provide adequate protection against electric shock.
However, as the operating time of the RCCB is 0.04 s for a current of 47.1
A, it gives adequate protection for electric shock.
(b) If the same installation is part of a TN-S system, the earth fault loop
impedance is :
Ω=
++++=
++++=
0.822
6.0)3.0042.011.011.0(
)X()RRRR(Z
22
2
E
2
Ecpc16,cpc4,4TNEFL,
The line-to-earth fault current is :
A280
822.0
230
I TN,EF ==
The operating time of the 32-A type 1 MCB is within 0.1 s but for the type
C MCB, it is slightly more than 5 s. Thus, only type 1 MCB and the RCCB can
satisfy the requirements for protection against electric shock if the same
installation is part of a TN-S system.
Example 4.3
A 230-V supply to an electric heater utilises a circuit of pvc-insulated
copper conductor cable of 6 mm2, protected by a 40-A MCB with a CPC size
of 4 mm2. The length of the cable is 18 m and the CPC is bundled together
with the phase conductors as shown in Figure 4.9. It is assumed that a type
B MCB is first installed and then it may be replaced by a type C MCB
subsequently during maintenance. If the external earth fault loop
impedance RE +jXE is (0.12 + j0.8)Ω, determine whether the size of 4 mm2
CPC can satisfy the electric shock protection as well as the thermal
constraint. Temperature correction on cable resistive value is required.
100 Chapter 4
clipped direct, 18m40A
Heater
MCB
RE = 0.12Ω
XE = 0.8Ω
2×6mm2
1C/Cu/PVC, 1×4mm2
(CPC)
Figure 4.9 Circuit for Example 4.3
Solution
Assume that the average temperature for both phase conductors and the
CPC during the fault is (70+160)/2 = 1150C. From Table 4D1B column 4) of
IEE Regulations [Ref 3, P 189],
6 mm2 : (mV/A/m)r = 7.3 mΩ
4 mm2 : (mV/A/m)r = 11 mΩ
The resistive values for the 6 mm2 cable and the 4 mm2 cable at an
assumed conductor temperature of 1150C are :
Ω=×⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛
+
+
×=
Ω=×⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛
+
+
×=
0.1139
1000
18
70230
115230
2
11
R
0.0756
1000
18
70230
115230
2
7.3
R
4
6
The earth fault loop impedance is :
( )
( )
0.858
0.80.120.11390.0756
XRRRZ
22
2
E
2
E46TNEFL,
Ω=
+++=
+++=
The line-to-earth fault current is :
A268
858.0
230
I TN,EF ==
As the disconnection time for heater (fixed equipment) is within 5s and
from Table 2.2, the current causing the type B 40-A MCB to operate within
5 s is 200 A and for type C, is 400 A. Thus, the corresponding maximum
earth fault loop impedances are :
Ω=
Ω=
575.0
400
230
=Z
15.1
200
230
=Z
CtypeA,max,40TN,EFL,
BtypeA,40max,,TN,EFL
Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 101
Since ZEFL,TN is 0.858Ω, which is lower than ZEFL,TN,max,40A,typeB (1.15 Ω), it
satisfies the requirements for protection against electric shock. However,
since ZEFL,TN is higher than ZEFL,TN,max,40A,typeC (0.575 Ω), the type C MCB fails
to meet the requirements. In other words, the disconnection time of the
40-A type C MCB exceeds 5 s.
For an earth fault current of 268 A, the operating time of the type B MCB
is 0.1 s (from Table 2.2), and for type C, 8 s (from Figure 2.9). To satisfy
the thermal constraint, the minimum cross-sectional areas of the CPCs for
type B and type C MCBs are :
2
22
Ctypemin,
2
22
Btypemin,
mm6.59
115
8268
k
tI
=S
mm0.737
115
0.1268
k
tI
S
=
×
=
=
×
==
Thus, by using type B MCB, the CPC of 4 mm2 satisfies the thermal
constraint since it only requires a minimum size of 0.737 mm2. For type C
MCB, however, the CPC size of 4 mm2 is not adequate since the required
minimum size is 6.59 mm2.
This application example illustrates that the design engineer should not
select CPC according to the minimum requirement of the type B MCB, as
type C MCB may be replaced during maintenance.
Example 4.4
Use the same details as for Example 4.3, except that the CPC is separated
with the phase conductors and the protective device is a 63-A RCCB with a
rated residual current of IΔ N at 0.03 A. This RCCB operates at 0.04 s at a
residual current of 5 IΔ N.
(a) Is the size of CPC acceptable based on the thermal constraint and the
electric shock constraint?
(b) If an intentional time delay is introduced, determine the maximum
time delay which can satisfy both the thermal constraint and electric
shock constraint.
Solution
(a) Since the operating current of the RCCB is 5 x 0.03 = 0.15 A at 0.04 s
and the line-to-earth fault current IEF,TN is 268 A (calculated in
Example 4.3), the RCCB will operate within 0.04 s which satisfies the
requirements for electric shock protection.
102 Chapter 4
The maximum disconnection time based on the thermal limit of the CPC of 4
mm2 is :
s4.56
268
4143
I
Sk
t 2
22
2
22
maxcable,
TNEF,
=
×
==
As the CPC is separated with the phase conductor, the temperature before
the fault is 300
C and thus the value of k is 143 instead of 115 as in Example
4.3 where the temperature before the fault is 700
C. Since the operating
time of the RCCB is 0.04 s which is lower than 4.56 s, it satisfies the
requirement for the thermal constraint.
(b) Based on the thermal limit of the CPC of 4 mm2, the maximum time
delay for the RCCB is :
4.56 - 0.04 = 4.52 s
Based on the requirement for electric shock protection, the maximum time
delay is :
5 - 0.04 = 4.96 s
Example 4.5
For a 3-phase 4-wire system, draw a schematic diagram of an earth fault
protection scheme for a 500-A MCCB using one IDMT relay. It is required
to isolate an earth fault current of 50 A within 3 seconds. Determine the
number of current transformers (CT), CT ratio and the relay’s plug setting
(PS) and the time multiplier setting (TMS). The maximum earth fault
current of the installation is 400 A.
Solution
The schematic diagram for earth fault protection for a MCCB is shown in
Figure 4.10. The earth fault relay operates by detecting the vector sum of
the red, yellow, blue and neutral currents. Thus, four CTs are required.
The CT ratio is 500/5 since the MCCB is rated at 500 A. As it is required
to detect an earth fault current of 50 A, the plug setting should be 10%
since the CT ratio is 500/5. The relay constant M corresponding to a
maximum earth fault current of 400 A can be calculated by :
8
10500
100400
PSCT
100I
M EF
=
×
×
=
×
×
=
The operating time of the relay [Ref. 6, P 139] is :
TMS
1M
14.0
t 02.0
×
−
=
Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 103
500A
B
Y
R
N
EFST
Figure 4.10 Schematic diagram for earth fault protection
If this relay has to operate within 3 seconds, the value of t is 3 in the
above equation, and thus :
( ) ( )
3
0.14
8 1
TMS
TMS
3 8 1
0.14
3 1.042 1
0.14
0.9
0.02
0.02
=
−
×
=
× −
=
× −
=
In other words, for a CT ratio of 500/5 and for a 10% plug setting, the
earth fault relay will activate at an earth fault current of 500 x 0.1 = 50
A. If the relay’s TMS setting is 0.9, the relay will operate at 3 seconds for
an earth fault current of 400 A.
4.6 REFERENCES
[1] IEEE Std 142-1991, “IEEE Recommended Practice for Grounding of
Industrial and Commercial Power System”, IEEE, 1991.
[2] CP16 : 1991, “Code of Practice for Earthing”, SISIR, 1991.
[3] “IEE Regulations for Electrical Installations”, 16th Edition, IEE, UK, 1991.
[4] IEC 479-1 Technical Report, “ Effects of Current on Human Beings and
Livestock, Part 1”, International Electrotechnical Commision, 1994.
[5] IEE Guidance Notes No.5, “Guidance Notes on Protection against Electric
Shock”, IEE, UK, 1992
[6] GEC, “Protective Relays Application Guide”, GEC Measurements, UK, 1987.
[7] Teo C Y, He W X, Chan T W,“ A Phase Co-ordinate Approach to Calculate
Earth-fault Current and Shock Voltage”, IEE proceedings on Electric
Power Applications, Vol. 144, No. 6, PP 441 – 115,1997.
[8] CP5: 1998. “Code of Practice for Electrical Installations”, Singapore
Productivity and Standards Board, 1998.
CHAPTER 5
FUSES
According to BS 88 [Ref. 1], a fuse refers to a device that by the fusing of
one or more of its specially designed and proportioned components opens
the circuit in which it is inserted by breaking the current when the current
exceeds a given value for a sufficient time. The fuse comprises all the
parts that form the complete device. The complete device consists of a
fuse-holder and a fuse-base. Each fuse-holder has a fuse-carrier and a
fuse-link as shown in Figure 5.1
Fuse-carrier
Fuse-link
Fuse-base
Figure 5.1 Component parts of a fuse
BS 88 [Ref. 1] also defines a fuse-link as a device comprising a fuse element
enclosed in a cartridge, usually filled with an arc-extinguishing medium and
connected to terminations. The fuse-link is the part of a fuse that
requires replacing after the fuse has operated. The arc-extinguishing
medium consists of high purity sand or powdered quartz and the material
for the fuse-element is either silver or copper. Once a fuse-element
operates (i.e. melts), the arc with its high instantaneous power creates a
tube of melted sand around it which withdraws energy from the arc and
extinguishes it. The spray of metal from the arc root is also entrapped in
the filler.
104
Fuses 105
Fuses are still used extensively in the utility’s LV network for cable
protection; as backup protection in the industrial installation for a circuit-
breaker that has inadequate breaking capacity, and for protection in
various types of electrical appliances. The main advantage of the fuse is its
ability to interrupt very large short-circuit currents safely within its
breaking capacity and in a much shorter time than that of a circuit breaker.
The other advantage is its lower capital cost as compared to a circuit
breaker of a similar rating and breaking capacity. The disadvantages of
using fuses are obviously that once a fuse has operated, it has to be
replaced by the correct type; and that fuses generates heat, dissipates
power and may also result in a voltage drop.
5.1 CHARACTERISTIC OF FUSES
A fuse rated at 50 A does not operate when a current of more than 50 A,
say 60 A passes through it during a slight overload condition. A fuse with a
specified breaking capacity of 80 kA does not ‘see’ the 80 kA at all when
the prospective current of 80 kA passes through it. The current of 80 kA
is actually ‘cut-off’ by the specially designed fuse-element.
5.1.1 Current Rating and Fusing Current
The rated current of a fuse is a current stated by the manufacturer as the
current that the fuse-link, fuse-carrier and fuse-base will carry
continuously without deterioration in accordance with the specified
conditions. The conventional non-fusing current (Inf) is a value of current
specified as that which the fuse-link is capable of carrying for a specified
time (conventional time) without melting. The conventional time can be 1 hr
(for IN < 63 A), 2 hr (for IN < 160 A), 3 hr (for IN < 400 A) or 4 hr (for IN
> 400 A). The conventional fusing current (If) is a value of current
specified as that which causes operation of the fuse-link within the
conventional time. For “gG” fuse-links, Inf = 1.25 IN, and If = 1.6 IN where
IN is the current rating of the fuse. Based on the range of breaking
capacity and utilisation category, BS 88 [Ref. 1] defines fuses by two
letters as follows:
gG : full-range breaking capacity (g) for general applications (G).
gM : full-range breaking capacity (g) for protection of motor circuits (M).
aM : partial range breaking capacity (a) for protection of motor (M). The
partial range refers to the high current range for short circuit
protection. This type of fuse is not designed to interrupt small
overcurrent.
106 Chapter 5
5.1.2 I2t and Cut-off Current
A conductor will generate heat by the passage of current through it. The
heat generated in the conductor which has a resistance value of R, in the
time dt for a current I, is I2R dt. In other words, I2dt Joules are
generated for every ohm of conductor. If the current is changing over a
time interval, the integral of I2dt (i.e. ∫ I2dt) Joules will be generated for
every ohm of resistance. If a fuse-link is tested on a very high prospective
current, there is no time for the heat to be lost into the surrounding and
thus I2t required to melt the fuse-element is constant and independent of
the injected current. However, the pre-arcing I2t is proportional to the
square of the cross-sectional area of the section melted [Ref. 2, P 327].
For silver to be used as the fuse-element, the value of I2t is 66,000
S2A2s, and for copper, it is 90,000 S2A2s where S is the cross-sectional
area of the fuse-element at the narrowest point in mm2, A is the current in
amperes and s is the time in seconds. Limits on the minimum and maximum
values of the pre-arcing I2t at 0.01 s specified by BS 88 [Ref.1, P 22] are
given in Table 5.1.
Typical values of the pre-arcing I2t and the total I2t for a range of fuses
from 2 A to 1250 A under short-circuit conditions on prospective current
up to 80 kA are given in Figure 5.2 and Figure 5.3. The operating I2t is the
sum of the pre-arcing I2t and the arcing I2t. For a particular fuse rating,
as the I2t is at a constant value, the prospective current that passes
through the fuse will be limited to a value called the cut-off current. For
example, for a prospective current of 80 kA (r.m.s. symmetrical) passing
through a fuse-link rated at 400 A, this current will be cut-off at 40 kA
peak which is equal to 28 kA r.m.s. For the same fuse link, if the
prospective current is 30 kA (r.m.s. symmetrical), this current will be cut-
off at 30 kA peak which is equal to 21 kA r.m.s. The prospective current is
defined as the current that would flow in the same circuit if the fuse had
been replaced by a copper link of negligible resistance. The value of the
cut-off current is a function of the normal rating of the fuse, the
prospective current and the degree of asymmetry of the short-circuit
current. Figure 5.4 shows the values of cut-off current of a particular
fuse-link for ratings from 2 A to 1250 A.
An indication of the speed of operation and current limiting ability of a
400-A fuse-link is given in Figure 5.5 which shows the oscillogram of the
fuse interrupting a prospective current of 80 kA r.m.s. at 400 V. The cut-
off current is 39.5 kA and the instantaneous power absorbed by the
Fuses 107
melting sand is 36,700 kW. The pre-arcing time is 0.0016 s and the arcing
time is 0.0034 s.
Fig 5.2 I2
t characteristics for fuse-link from 2 to 160 A
2 6 10 16 20 32 40 50 63 100 160
Fuse rating (Amperes)
100
101
102
103
104
105
Operating I2
t at 415V
I2
t
(A2
s)
Pre-arcing I2
t
Operating I2
t at 550V
Operating I2
t at 660V
Fig 5.3 I2
t characteristics for fuse-link from 200 to 1250 A
200 250 315 400 500 630 710 800 1250
Fuse rating (Amperes)
I2
t
(A2
s)
106
105
104
107
108 Chapter 5
Table 5.1 Pre-arcing I2t at 0.01 s for ‘gG’ fuse-links
Fuse rating I2t, (103 x A2s)
min max
16 0.3 1.0
32 1.8 5.0
40 3.0 9.0
63 9.0 27.0
100 27.0 86.0
125 46.0 140.0
200 140.0 400.0
400 760.0 2250.0
630 2250.0 7500.0
1250
800
630
500
400
315
200
125
80
50
35
25
16
6
2
1.0 10 1000.1
100
101
102
Cut-off
current
(kA, peak)
Prospective current (kA r.m.s.)
Fig 5.4 Cut-off current characteristics for fuse-link from 2 to 1250 A
Fuses 109
39.5 kA
Cut-off
current
0
t
t
t
930 V
Peak arcing
voltage
Recovery
voltage
Prospective
current
36,700 kW Energy dissipated in
fuse cartridge
Pre-arcing
0.0016s
Arcing
0.0034s
Pre-arcing
I2
t
t
2.44X106
A2
s
592X103
A2
s
Total I2
t
15.87 Wh
Fig 5.5 The operation of a 400-A fuse-link at 80 kA
5.1.3 Time-current Zone
The time-current characteristic of a fuse-link is a curve giving the pre-
arcing time or the operating time (the sum of pre-arcing time and arcing
time) as a function of the prospective current under the stated conditions
of operation. For a time longer than 0.1 s for practical purposes, the
difference between pre-arcing time and operating time is negligible. This
time-current characteristic similar to the time-current characteristic of
MCB, can be used to determine the operating time of a fuse-link for a
particular prospective current if the operating time is above 0.1 s. For
operating times less than 0.1 s, the arcing time becomes a significant part
and the asymmetric currents may vary considerably and thus the operating
time below 0.1 s cannot be obtained accurately.
110 Chapter 5
Instead of specifying the time-current characteristic, many standards
specify a time-current zone. The time-current zone indicates the range
contained by the minimum pre-arcing time-current characteristic and the
maximum operating time-current characteristic under specified conditions.
Four points known as gates in the time-current zone are specified. These
gates are the maximum and minimum levels between which the
manufacturer’s time-current characteristics for individual fuse-links must
lie. The values of the four gates are: the minimum value of current
corresponding to the pre-arching time of 0.1 s, Imin (0.1 s), the maximum
value of current corresponding to the pre-arcing time of 0.1 s, Imax (0.1 s),
the minimum value of current corresponding to the pre-arcing time of 10 s,
Imin (10 s), and the maximum value of current corresponding to the pre-
arcing time of 5 s, Imax (5 s). Typical time-current zones [Ref. 3] for ‘gG’
fuse-link are given in Figure 5.6 together with the four gates for the 63-A
fuse-link.
Fig 5.6 Time-current zones for “gG” fuse-link
1 hr
2 hr
3 hr
4 hr
104
10-1
100
101
102
103
105
Time (seconds)
10 100 1,000 10,000
Prospective current (Amperes)
4 10 16 40 63 100 250 400 630 1000
Fuses 111
5.2 MINIATURE FUSES
Miniature fuses are fuses with dimensions of 5 mm x 20 mm and
6.3⋅mm⋅x⋅32 mm. They are used for the protection of electric appliances,
electronic equipment and the relevant components. These fuses are rated
at 250 V with a current rating from 32 mA to 6.3 A. Fuses in this category
normally have a resistance value in the range from 1 Ω to 200 Ω. Thus, the
voltage drop at rated current can vary from 1 V to as high as 10V. Typical
values of the maximum sustained power dissipation for miniature fuses are
1.6 W, 2.5 W and 4 W.
High and Low Breaking Capacity
There are two types of miniature fuse-links, namely low breaking capacity
and high breaking capacity. The low breaking capacity types have
cylindrical glass bodies and the fuse-element breaks the current in the air
within the glass body. The rated breaking capacity is 35 A or 10 IN,
whichever is greater. This breaking capacity is adequate for clearing
short-circuit currents at component level. However, at the incoming supply
to the equipment, a fuse-link of higher breaking capacity is required. A
miniature fuse-link with high breaking capacity is rated at 1.5 kA. These
fuse-links have ceramic barrels and are filled with sand.
Quick-Acting and Time-Lag
To satisfy the operation requirements for various applications, the speeds
of operation of the miniature fuse-links are made in five different types,
ranging from very quick acting type to long time-lag which may take up to 5
s for four times the rated current. According to BS EN 60127-1 [Ref. 4],
the symbols denoting the speed of operation are to be marked on the fuse
as follows:
FF : denoting very quick acting
F : denoting quick acting
M : denoting medium time-lag
T : denoting time-lag
TAT : denoting long time lag
The pre-arcing time/current characteristic of the high breaking capacity
fuses are summarised in Table 5.2 and for the low breaking capacity fuses
in Table 5.3. In some applications, surge-proof time-lag fuse-links are
required. This fuse-link is able to absorb the transient inrush current when
switching on capacitors or motors. Each fuse-link shall be marked with its
112 Chapter 5
type of operation, rated current, type of breaking capacity and the rated
voltage.
Examples of markings are:
T315L 250 V : time lag, 315 mA, low breaking capacity, 250 V
F4H 250 V : quick-acting, 4 A, high breaking capacity, 250 V
Table 5.2 Time/current characteristic of high breaking fuses
Injected Current 2.1 IN
2.75 IN
4 IN
10 IN
Pre-arcing time Quick-acting 30 min 2 s 0.3 s 0.02 s
Time-lag 30 min 80 s 5 s 0.1 s
Table 5.3 Time/current characteristic of low breaking fuses
Injected Current 2.1 IN
2.75 IN
4 IN
10 IN
Pre-arcing time Quick-acting 30 min 2 s 0.3 s 0.02 s
Time-lag 2 min 10 s 3 s 0.3 s
Miniature Fuse Standards
The main industrial standards for miniature fuses are BS EN 60127-1 [Ref.
4] and BS EN 60127-2 [Ref. 5]. These two standards define the
requirements, standard ratings, markings and methods of testing.
Standard Rating
Voltage : 60, 150, 250 V
Current : 50, 63, 80, 100, 125, 160, 200, 250, 315, 400, 500,
630, 800 mA
1, 1.25, 1.6, 2, 2.5, 3.15, 4, 5, 6.3 A
Breaking capacity : 35 A, 1.5 kA
Power dissipation : 1.6, 2.5, 4 W
5.3 LOW VOLTAGE FUSES
The low-voltage fuses cover a large range of fuses incorporating enclosed
current-limiting fuse-links with rated breaking capacity of not less than
6 kA. They are used for protection of a.c. circuits of nominal voltages not
exceeding 1000 V or d.c. circuits of nominal voltages, not exceeding 1500 V.
The low-voltage fuses have three major groups, namely the BS 88 [Ref. 1]
of a high breaking capacity up to 80 kA for industrial and utility
applications, the BS 1361 [Ref. 6] with a breaking capacity up to 33 kA for
use in domestic and office buildings, and the BS 1362 [Ref. 7] with a
breaking capacity of 6 kA for use in plugs.
Fuses 113
80-kA Fuse
Fuses for industrial applications with breaking capacity up to 80 kA are
specified in BS 88: Part 2 [Ref. 1] and in IEC 269-2-1 [Ref. 3]. The
preferred current ratings for fuse-links are: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 25,
32, 40, 50, 63, 80, 100, 125, 160, 200, 250, 315, 400, 500, 630, 800, 1000,
1250 A. The values of the maximum power dissipation are in the range
from 3 W for a 20-A fuse, 40 W for a 400-A fuse to 100 W for a 1250-A
fuse. Fuse-links are also classified according to their fusing factors. A
class P fuse-link shall have a fusing factor not exceeding 1.25 and a class
Q1 fuse-link not exceeding 1.5 [Ref. 8].
Typical time/current characteristics for fuses to BS 88: Part 2 and Part 6
are given in Figure 5.7. BS 88: Part 5 [Ref. 9] specifies the fuse link
ratings from 100 A to 630 A for use in utility’s low-voltage supply network.
BS 88: Part 6 [Ref. 10] specifies the fuse-link for use in industrial and
commercial installations which have current ratings of 2, 4, 6, 10, 16, 20,
25, 32, 40, 50 and 63 A.
Figure 5.7 Time-current characteristic for fuse to BS 88
6A 20A 32A 50A 80A 125A
200A
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
10 2 4 100 2 4 1000
Prospective current (Amperes)
Time (seconds)
1 hr
2 hr
114 Chapter 5
33-kA and 16.5-kA Fuses
BS 1361 [Ref. 6] specifies the requirements for fuses for a.c. circuits of
240 V with a breaking capacity of 16.5 kA for use in consumer’s DBs in
dwelling houses, blocks of flats and office buildings. It also covers fuses
of 415 V with a breaking capacity of 33 kA for use by the supply utility in
the incoming service units of such premises. The current ratings are 5, 15,
20, 30 and 45 A for the 16.5-kA fuse, and 60, 80 and 100 A for the 33-kA
fuse. The values of maximum power dissipation are in the range of 1 W to 8
W. Typical time/current characteristics are given in Figure 5.8.
Fig 5.8 Time-current characteristics for fuse to BS 1361
5A 15A 20A 30A 45A 60A 80A 100A
10 2 4 100 2 4 1,000
Prospective current (Amperes)
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
Time (seconds)
1 hr
2 hr
6-kA Fuse
BS 1362 [Ref. 7] specifies the dimensions and performance requirements
for general purpose cartridge fuse-links of a current rating not exceeding
Fuses 115
13 A, primarily for use in plugs at a voltage not exceeding 250 V. The rated
breaking capacity is 6 kA and the preferred current ratings are 3 A
(coloured red) and 13 A (coloured brown). Other current ratings may be
used for special applications and are coloured black. Standard
time/current zones for 3-A and 13-A fuse-links are shown in Figure 5.9.
5.4 APPLICATION GUIDES
Almost the whole LV cable network of an urban utility uses fuses as the
only protective devices for overload and short-circuit protection. Although
MCCBs and MCBs are popular and the cost margin between circuit breakers
and fuses is small, there are still many existing industrial installations which
utilise fuses as the only means of protection except for the incoming
circuit which is protected by an ACB. Fuses are also used intensively in
plugs, appliances and at various component levels in electronic equipment.
Therefore, a guide on the selection of fuses is still essential.
Time (seconds)
13A3A
10 2 4 100 2 4 1,000
104
103
102
101
100
10-1
10-2
Current (Amperes)
Fig 5.9 Time-current zone for fuse to BS 1362
116 Chapter 5
The single-line diagram of a typical low-voltage (LV) board feeding by a 1-
MVA 6.6/0.4-kV transformer for utility services is shown in Figure 1.14. All
the outgoing circuits are four-core 300 mm2 copper conductors XLPE
cables protected by BS 88 fuses rated at 500 A. Each outgoing circuit
from the LV board is connected to a number of over-ground (OG) boxes.
The single-line diagram of a typical OG box is shown in Figure 1.15. Each
outgoing circuit from the OG box is a four-core or two-core copper
conductors XLPE cable protected by a BS 88 fuse rated at 200 A. The
outgoing circuits from OG boxes feed the consumers directly.
5.4.1 Cable Protection
In section 3.5, the conditions for adequate protection of cables for
overload are specified. They are:
(i) IN < IZ
(ii) I2 < 1.45 IZ
IEE Regulation 433-02-02 [Ref. 11, P 45] states that where the protective
device is a general purpose type (gG) fuse to BS 88 Part 2, a fuse to BS88
Part 6, or a fuse to BS 1361, compliance with condition (i) also results in
compliance with condition (ii).
Based on BS 88 Part 2 [Ref. 8], class Q1 fuse-links have a fusing factor not
exceeding 1.5. In other words, the fuse will operate at 1.5 IN, i.e. I2= 1.5
IN. BS 88 Part 1 [Ref. 1, P 14] has considered a conventional fusing current
of 1.6 IN, i.e. I2 = 1.6 IN. Thus, if the cable size is so selected that IZ is
equal to or slightly higher than IN, condition (ii) may not be fully satisfied.
Let us consider the following case:
IN = 100 A, IZ = 100 A and 1.45 IZ = 145 A
Based on a fusing factor of 1.5, the value of I2 is 150 A and based on a
conventional fusing current of 1.6 IN, the value of I2 is 160 A. In either
case, I2 is not < 1.45 IZ and condition (ii) is not satisfied. Thus, to provide
adequate protection for small overloads, it is suggested that the value of
IZ should not be too close to IN.
For short-circuit protection to prevent thermal damage to the cable, IEE
Regulation 434-03-03 [Ref. 11, P 46] requires the operating time of the
protective device to be less or equal to tcable,max as follows :
2
F
22
maxcable,
I
Sk
t =
Fuses 117
where k, S and IF are specified in Section 3.6. This formula can be used to
check for short-circuit protection by fuses in the same way as by breakers.
However, during short-circuit conditions for which the short-circuit
current would result in the fuse to operate within 0.1 s, the requirement
for short-circuit protection can be stated as:
I2t < k2S2
where the I2t is the let-through operating I2t of the fuse (not equal to the
square of the prospective current times the operating time of the
protective device). As long as I2t is less than k2S2, it ensures that the
fuse-links selected will not allow the cable to exceed its critical (maximum)
temperature if a short-circuit fault occurs. You may consider a fuse as a
weak link in a circuit and it has much smaller cross-sectional area than the
cable it protects. During short circuit, the fuse-element will reach its
melting point before the cable reaches its critical temperature. Thus, as
long as the let-through operating I2t of the fuse is lower than the k2S2 of
the cable, it is always safe. The larger the current, the quicker the fuse-
element melts. If deterioration should occur, it operates even faster.
Therefore, a fuse is a device that ‘fails safe’.
Example 5.1
The same details for Example 3.10 are used, except that the protective
device is a BS 88 fuse rated at 63 A as shown in Figure 5.10.
1C/Cu/PVC/NA, clipped direct4 x 10 mm2
BS88
63A
= 50A IF = 4000AIB
Figure 5.10 Circuit for Example 5.1
Solution
(a) IN = 63 A, IZ = 59 A
I2 = 1.5 x 63 = 94.5 A based on a fusing factor of 1.5 or
I2 = 1.6 x 63 = 100.8 A based on a conventional fusing current of 1.6 IN
1.45 IZ = 1.45 x 59 = 85.6 A
Since IN is not < IZ and I2 is not < 1.45 IZ, this circuit does not provide
adequate overload protection. The designer should select the next higher
size of conductor such as 16 mm2 so that this circuit can be fully protected
by overload.
118 Chapter 5
(b) In Example 3.10, since the operating time of the MCCB is 0.15 s, which
is larger than the critical time of 0.0827 s, this circuit could not provide
adequate protection for thermal damage during short-circuit conditions. In
this example, we have replaced the 60-A MCCB by a BS 88 63-A fuse. The
operating I2t of the 63-A fuse obtained from Figure 5.2 is 22 x 103 A2s
and the k2S2 of the cable is:
k2S2 = 1152 x 102 = 1,322,500 A2s
= 1,323 x 103 A2s
It is obvious that the k2S2 of the cable is much larger than the I2t of the
fuse, and thus, it provides very good protection from short-circuit
currents. In this particular application, a MCCB fails and a fuse passes.
The value of I2t of the 63-A fuse obtained from Figure 5.2 is based on a
prospective current of 80 kA but in this example, the prospective current
is only 4 kA. Thus, the value of I2t for the 63-A fuse may not be 22 x 103
A2s. However, the referred value of 22 x 103 A2s is much lesser than the
k2S2 of the cable of 1323 x 103 A2s.
5.4.2 Motor Circuit
In a motor circuit, the starter overload relay protects the associated cable
against overload current, and the fuse-link in the circuit provides the
required degree of short-circuit protection. Therefore, the selection of
fuse-link is based on the requirement for short-circuit protection only, i.e.:
I2t < k2S2
where I2t is the operating I2t of the fuse-link.
In addition to the ability to interrupt fault current and protect the
associated contractor and cable, the fuse-link must also be capable of
withstanding the motor starting current for the starting period. The
general methods of determining the capability of a fuse to withstand motor
starting conditions is to refer to the 10-s withstand current. Usually it is
assumed that the starting current is approximately seven times the motor
full load current and that such a current would exist for up to 10 s.
Most of the fuse manufacturers give recommended sizes of fuse-links for
standard sizes of motors in their catalogues. BS 88 also specifies the value
of current for each rating of fuse-links to withstand for 10 s [Ref. 1, P 15].
Fuses 119
If the manufacturer’s data is not available, the starting conditions are
suggested in Table 5.4.
Table 5.4 Typical starting condition
Motor Rating DOL Starter Assisted Starters
up to 1 kW 5 x IFL for 5 sec 2.5 x IFL for 20 sec
1.1 kW to 75 kW 7 x IFL for 10 sec 4 x IFL for 15 sec
Above 75 kW 6 x IFL for 15 sec 3.5 x IFL for 10 sec
For a fuse-link in a motor circuit, a dual rating such as 32M63 may be used.
The first rating denotes the continuous current rating of the fuse-holder
in which the fuse-link can be fitted and the second rating (after the letter
M) indicates the time/current characteristic of the fuse-link. Therefore,
the 32M63 fuse-link has a continuous rating of 32 A because of the
limitation of the fuse-holder in which it is installed, and has the same
time/current characteristic as the standard 63-A fuse-link.
Example 5.2
The same details as in Example 2.2 are used, except that the protective
device is a BS 88 fuse instead of an MCCB as shown in Figure 5.11.
Motor
20 kWDOL
BS88
Figure 5.11 Selection of the current rating of a fuse
Solution
As calculated in Example 2.2, the 3-phase short-circuit current at the main
switchboard is 28.86 kA. A BS 88 fuse with a breaking capacity of 80 kA
or a BS 1361 fuse with a breaking capacity of 33 kA will be adequate to
provide protection for short circuit.
As the full load current is 35.75 A, the current rating of the fuse should
be at least equal to 35.75 A and a standard size of 50 A will be adequate.
For an ambient temperature of 200C and a starting current of 250 A for 10
120 Chapter 5
s, the operating time of the 50-A fuse obtained from Figure 5.7 is 4 s. If
the current rating of the fuse is 80 A, the operating time is 60 s. Thus, a
BS 88 fuse with a current rating of 80 A is selected. In Example 2.2, the
current rating of the MCCB is 63 A which has an operating time of 18 s for
the starting current of 250 A.
BS 88 Part 2 [Ref. 8] requires fuse-links be suitable for use in ambient air
temperature not exceeding 350C and it is recognised that derating may be
necessary at higher ambient air temperatures. Thus, for an ambient
temperature of 400C, the current rating of the fuse may have to be higher
than 80 A. The designer must check for the relevant derating factor from
the fuse manufacturers or their publications.
5.4.3 Electric Shock
Fuses normally do not operate fast enough to protect against electric
shock, as the earth leakage current is usually not high enough for the fuse
to operate within the required time. For example, based on Figure 5.7, for
an earth fault current of 100 A, the operating time of a 20-A fuse is 1.5 s
and for a 32-A fuse, 15 s. As discussed in Section 4.5, protection against
electric shock requires the protective device to operate in either 0.4 s or 5
s. Therefore, for installation that is protected by fuse, an RCCB is always
recommended especially for a TT system. However, if protection for
electric shock has to be provided by a fuse, the earth fault loop impedance
for the circuit has to be reduced to a value such that the earth fault
current is high enough to operate the fuse within the required time of
either 0.4 s or 5 s.
Table 41B1 of IEE Regulations [Ref. 11, P 33] specifies the maximum earth
fault loop impedance for fuses to operate within 0.4 s, Table 41C(a) of the
IEE Regulations [Ref. 11, P 34] specifies the maximum impedance of the CPC
for a disconnection time not exceeding 5 s and Table 41D(a) of IEE
Regulations [Ref. 10, P 35] specifies the maximum earth fault impedance
for a 5 s disconnection time.
As discussed in Section 4.4.1, the values of the maximum earth fault loop
impedance are obtained by:
timerequiredthewithinoperationcausingcurrentEffective
voltageearth-to-lineRated
Z max,TN,EFL =
Fuses 121
If the overcurrent protective device is a BS 88 32-A fuse, and based on
Figure 5.7, the current causing the 32-A fuse to be operated at 0.4 s is
220 A, and at 5 s is 125 A. Thus, the maximum earth fault loop impedance
for a line-to-earth voltage of 240 V at 0.4 s disconnection time is:
Ω== 09.1
220
240
Z 4.0max,,TN,EFL
The value of 1.09 Ω is identical to the value given in Table 41B1 of the IEE
Regulations. The maximum earth fault loop impedance for a line-to-earth
voltage of 240 V at 5 s disconnection time is:
Ω== 92.1
125
240
Z 5max,,TN,EFL
The value of 1.92 Ω is also identical to the value given in Table 41D of IEE
Regulations. If the line-to-earth voltage is 230 V, the maximum earth fault
loop impedance is:
Ω=×= 045.1
240
230
09.1Z 230,4.0max,,TN,EFL
or it can be calculated by:
230
220
1045= . Ω
5.4.4 Discrimination
For a simple network as shown in Figure 5.12, if there is a short-circuit or
excess overload in one of the outgoing circuits, the respective fuse (called
minor fuse) should operate first to isolate the fault. If, however, the
incoming fuse (called major fuse) operates faster than the minor fuse, it
will result in the loss of supply to all the outgoing circuits. This un-
coordinated operation is known as loss of discrimination.
Positive discrimination under short-circuit conditions is achieved when the
major fuse-link is unaffected by the fault current which causes the smaller
or minor fuse-link to operate. The total operating I2t let through by the
minor fuse-link must, therefore, be less than the pre-arcing I2t of the
major fuse-link. Typical I2t characteristics for a range of fuse-links are
122 Chapter 5
shown in Figures 5.2 and 5.3. They were derived from tests taken under
maximum arc energy conditions and can be used to assess discrimination at
415 V, 550 V or 660 V. For 415 V or 400 V applications, a current rating
ratio of 2: 1 between major and minor fuse-links will ensure discrimination
at all fault levels. However, the I2t characteristics can be used to assess
discrimination where it is necessary to resort to the use of a smaller ratio
to overcome a particular problem. At 550 V and 660 V, it may not always
be possible to assume a general discrimination ratio of 2:1 if large fault
levels are encountered. In such cases, the I2t characteristics must be
used to achieve a satisfactorily graded installation.
O/L
Minor fuse
Minor fuse
Minor fuse
Major fuse
Figure 5.12 Illustration for discrimination
5.4.5 Back-up for Circuit-breakers
Both MCCBs and MCBs have limited breaking capacity in the range from
6 kA to 35 kA but the breaking capacity of a BS 88 fuse is 80 kA. Final
circuits at a reasonably long distance from the incoming supply normally
have a fault level in the range from 4 kA to 10 kA. However, if MCBs or
MCCBs are installed very close to the incoming transformer, the fault level
may reach values of 20 to 25 kA which may exceed the breaker’s breaking
capacity. A short-circuit would be likely to cause the circuit-breaker to
fail or explode in the absence of suitable back up protection.
A fuse, with its high breaking capacity and its very short operating time
during a high prospective current, is therefore an ideal candidate to
provide stand-by back-up for a circuit breaker that has an inadequate
breaking capacity. The criteria for selecting fuses for such back-up
protection is illustrated in Figure 5.13 and as follows:
Fuses 123
Fig 5.13 Back-up of MCB by fuse
100 1,000 10,000 100,000
Current (Amperes)
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
Time (seconds)
BS 88
200A
MCB
100A
Type B
10mm2
Breaking capacity
T
(i) The time-current characteristic of the fuse-link should be such
that the operating time of the fuse is significantly greater (i.e. higher than
the curve of the circuit breaker) than the operating time of the circuit-
breaker at all currents up to the takeover current T as shown in Figure
5.13. In other words, for all fault currents below point ‘T’, the breaker
should operate faster than the fuse since the fault current is below the
level corresponding to the pre-arcing I2t of the fuse and also within the
breaker’s breaking capacity.
(ii) The take-over current T is chosen to be not exceeding the
breaking capacity of the breaker so that the fuse can take over at a
current just before it exceeds the breaking capacity of 10 kA as shown in
Figure 5.13.
124 Chapter 5
(iii) The current rating of the fuse is selected in such a way that the
operating I2t of the fuse-link will also provide protection against thermal
damage of the associated cable in the region exceeding 11 kA where the
breaker fails to provide such protection.
5.5 REFERENCES
[1] BS 88: Part 1: 1988, “Cartridge Fuses for Voltages up to and
including 1000 V a.c. and 1500 V d.c. Part 1: General Requirements”,
British Standard Institution, 1988/1991 (identical to IEC 269-1 :
1986).
[2] Electricity Council, “Power System Protection I”, Peter Petegrinus,
UK, 1981.
[3] IEC 269-2-1, “Low-voltage Fuses, Part 2: Supplementary
Requirements for Fuses for use by Authorised Persons (fuses
mainly for industrial applications)”, International Electrotechnical
Commission, 1987/1994.
[4] BSEN 60127-1: 1991, “Miniature Fuses, Part 1, Definitions for
Miniature Fuses and General Requirements for Miniature Fuse-
links”, British Standard Institution, 1991.
[5] BSEN 60127-2: 1991, “Miniature Fuses, Part 2, Specifications for
Cartridge Fuse-Links”, British Standard Institution, 1991.
[6] BS 1361 : 1971, “Cartridge Fuses for A.C. Circuits in Domestic and
Similar Premises”, British Standard Institution, 1971/1991.
[7] BS 1362 : 1973, “General Purpose Fuse-Links for Domestic and
Similar Purposes (primarily for use in plugs)”, British Standard
Institution, 1973/1991.
[8] BS 88 : Part 2 : 1975, “Supplementary Requirements for Fuses of
Standardised Dimensions and Performance for Industrial
Purposes”, British Standard Institution, 1975/1991.
[9] BS 88 : Part 5 : 1988, “Supplementary Requirements for Fuse-links
for use in a.c. Electricity Supply Networks”, British Standard
Institution, 1988.
[10] BS 88 : Part 6 : 1988, “Supplementary Requirements for Fuses of
Compact Dimension for use in 240/415 V a.c. Industrial and
Commercial Electrical Installations”, British Standard Institution,
1988/1991.
[11] “Regulations for Electrical Installation”, 16th Edition, IEE, 1991.
125
CHAPTER 6
DESIGN PROCEDURES
AND EXAMPLES
Safety of life and preservation of property are the first two important
factors to be considered in the design of low-voltage systems in buildings.
Safety to personnel should not be compromised at all and only the safest
system can be considered. The safety requirements should follow the
established codes such as the IEE Wiring Regulations [Ref 1], CP5 [Ref 2]
or NEC [Ref 3]. Most of the established codes require the installations to
be properly earthed and the whole electric system should be protected
adequately against electric shock. Such electric shock can be due to a
direct contact to any live conducting parts, or due to an indirect contact to
the exposed-conductive-parts which are maintained normally at the earth
potential, but may become live during an earth fault. In addition, every
electric circuit should be designed to be adequately protected against
overcurrent as a result of overload or short circuit.
Although overloaded circuits are electrically sound, sustained overload for
a long duration will result in the conductor temperature exceeding their
rated limit and the effectiveness of the insulation and their expected
lifetime will be reduced. The designer must also ensure that appropriate
protective devices are provided to interrupt any short-circuit current in
the conductor of every circuit before such current causes danger or
damage to the system due to thermal effects and mechanical forces
produced in conductors and connections.
The designer must provide a reliable system and keep the supply
interruption to a minimum. There should be no nuisance tripping of
breakers and no loss of discrimination in the automatic disconnection of
supply during any fault conditions. The estimated demand in each area of
the building should be met adequately over a long period and the designed
system must also be provided with some overload capability for
contingency. The designer must also provide flexibility for future
expansion and to meet varied requirements during the life of the plant.
While first costs are important, safety, reliability, voltage regulation, and
the potential for expansion must also be considered in the design of low-
voltage systems. On one hand, the designer should not provide unnecessary
126 Chapter 6
increase in the circuit capacity to avoid over-design. On the other hand,
the system should meet all the safety requirements as well as reliability
and flexibility, so that the installed system is robust enough and the
designer has nothing to worry and can always ‘sleep well’ over 20 to 30
years after the system has been commissioned and tested.
6.1 DESIGN CURRENTS
Since a good designer has to provide adequate and reliable supply at
minimum cost, the estimation of the design currents in each circuit in the
installation is a major factor that the designer has to decide. Any error in
the estimation of load current in the circuits would result in either over-
design which will increase the installation cost or under-design which will
result in more circuits being overloaded and frequent breaker tripping. The
design current which is the expected load current in a circuit can be
determined by the power demand (i.e. the rated wattage), power factor and
efficiency of the connected load. However, the design current of an
incoming circuit may not necessarily be equal to the current drawn by the
total connected load. For example, if a circuit has to supply 10 appliances,
each drawing up to 10 A, a 100 A circuit would presumably be required to
supply all appliances. In actual implementation, it is unlikely that each
appliance will be loaded up to the specified value of 10 A all the time and
that all the appliances would be used at the same time. Based on past
experiences, the designer may provide only an 85-A circuit. In other
words, we recognise that while the total connected load (TCL) may be 100
A, the maximum demand (MD) or the design current of the circuit will only
be 85 A.
6.1.1 Design Currents in a Final DB
Let us define a final DB as a DB that has appliances connected directly to
it, and each outgoing circuit from the final DB to the appliance as a final
circuit. Each final circuit has to carry the full load current of its
connected appliance and thus, the design current of each final circuit
should be equal to the full load current of the appliance. This full load
current is normally calculated from the wattage and power factor of the
connected load. However, the design current of the incoming circuit of the
final DB, also known as the maximum demand of the DB, should be less than
the summation of all the design currents in each outgoing circuit. The
current reduction in the incoming circuit is due to three reasons. First of
all, it is unlikely that all the final circuits will be turned on at the same time.
Secondly, if all the final circuits are turned on, it is unlikely that they will
Design Procedures and Examples 127
all carry their full load currents simultaneously. The third reason is that
the rating of many appliances, especially motors, are of standard rating
such as 500 W or 1000 W, and the actual required power (i.e. the
mechanical power in the case of a motor) is actually less than the standard
size. For example, for any required power in the range from 451 W to 499
W, a standard size 500 W motor will be used. Thus, the appropriate design
current of a DB can be obtained by defining a demand factor as follows:
TCL
MD
DF =
where: DF is the demand factor, MD is the maximum demand or the design
demand of a DB and TCL is the total connected load of the DB.
The value of the demand factor depends on the number of circuits and the
types of load connected to the DB. A typical value is in the range from 0.8
to 0.95.
6.1.2 Design Currents in a Distribution DB
Several final DBs may be connected to a main DB that will then be
connected to the incoming switchboard. Let us define all the
interconnected DBs except the final DBs as distribution DBs and all the
circuits connected between the various DBs as distribution circuits. As
there is no appliance connected directly to the distribution DB, the
estimation of load current or the design current will be slightly different
from the method for final DBs.
Final DB 1
Final DB 2
Distribution
circuit 1
Distribution
circuit 2
Figure 6.1 Design current for distribution DB
If a distribution DB is connected to two final DBs, DB1 and DB2, as shown
in Figure 6.1, the design current of distribution circuit 1 will be equal to the
maximum demand of the final DB1, and similarly, the design current of
distribution circuit 2 will be equal to the maximum demand of the final DB2.
128 Chapter 6
Let us examine the variation of maximum demand over a 24-hour period in
distribution circuits 1 and 2 as shown in Figure 6.2. Circuit 1 has a maximum
demand of 50 kW occurring at 4:00 p.m. Circuit 2 also has the same value
of maximum demand but occurs at 7:30 p.m. The hourly summation of the
maximum demand of circuits 1 and 2 should be equal to the hourly maximum
demand of the incoming circuit of the main DB as shown in Figure 6.2.
It is noted that the maximum demand of the main DB is 72.5 kW occurring
at 6:00 p.m. You may install a chart recorder at the incoming and the two
outgoing circuits, and you will find that although the maximum power of
both circuits are 50 kW, the maximum power at the incoming circuit is not
100 kW but 72.5 kW. The value of the maximum demand of the incoming
circuit depends on how coincident are the maximum demands of the two
outgoing circuits. It can, of course, be equal to 100 kW if the maximum
demands of the two outgoing circuits coincide.
M
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
0
50
72.5
aximum Demand (kW)
Time
circuit 2
circuit 1
incoming circuit
Figure 6.2 Maximum demand coincides at 6:00 p.m.
Design Procedures and Examples 129
For the estimation of design current in any distribution DB or at any
switchboard, if the values of the maximum demand of all the outgoing
circuits are given or have been estimated in the upstream calculation, the
maximum demand of the incoming circuit can be calculated by defining a
coincidence factor as follows:
∑=
= n
lk
K
I
MD
MD
CF
where: CF is the coincidence factor, MDI is the maximum demand of the
incoming circuit, n is the number of outgoing circuits and MDK is the
maximum demand of the kth outgoing circuit
The value of CF depends mainly on the number of outgoing circuits and has
a typical value from 0.75 to 0.95. In some other guides [Ref 4, P 66], a
diversity factor which is the reciprocal of CF is referred.
6.1.3 Procedure for Load Estimation
A suggested procedure for determining the design currents in various
sections of a building is given in the following steps.
♦ Determine the quantity of each type of load and the power
requirements. Estimate the design current in each final circuit based
on the rating of the connected load. Apply an appropriate demand
factor to obtain the maximum demand of each final DB.
♦ Determine the type of connection from the final DB to the main DB
and continue up to the incoming switchboard. Estimate the design
current in each distribution circuit using an appropriate coincidence
factor.
♦ Determine the spare capacity to be provided for load growth.
In the preliminary design stage of the project, the types of connected
loads and their exact number may not be available. Some typical data given
in Table 6.1 [Ref 4, P 57] can be referred to determine the total estimated
load in a building, if exact loads are not available.
Example 6.1
Calculate the partial load requirement of general purpose lighting, general
purpose socket outlets and air-conditioning of a new office building
consisting of 20 levels, each having a floor area of 1200 m2.
130 Chapter 6
Solution
Based on NEC [Ref 3, P 100], Table 220-3 (b), the general lighting load is
3.5 VA per ft2 and 1 VA per ft2 for general-purpose socket outlets. Based
on a conversion factor of 1 m2 to 10.8 ft2 and a power factor of 0.8, the
total general purpose lighting load is estimated to be:
kW726
kW)2012008.108.05.3(LL
=
××××=
The total load for general-purpose socket outlets is:
kW207
kW)2012008.108.01(LS
=
××××=
Based on an approximate air-conditioning load of 6 VA per ft2 that might
occur in the average office building [Ref 4, P 59], the total air-conditioning
load is:
kW1244
kW)2012008.108.06(LA
=
××××=
The partial load requirement of the building is:
kW2177
kW)1244207726(PL
=
++=
Table 6.1 Load Demand for Preliminary Analysis
Type of Load Average Demand
Lighting in Building 10 to 35 W/m2
General Purpose Socket Outlets 6 to 12 W/m2
Air Conditioning in Commercial Building 30 to 80 W/m2
Typical Textile Factory 120 W/m2
Small Device Manufacturing 35 to 75 W/m2
Typical Electronics Manufacturing 100 W/m2
Industrial Lighting 10 to 80 W/m2
Water Pump (10-storey) 10 to 45 kW
Fire Pump (10-storey) 65 to 100 kW
6.1.4 Standard Code for Diversity
Both CP5 [Ref 2] and the 15th Edition of the IEE Wiring Regulations have
17 appendices providing a great deal of data such as Appendix 4 on
maximum demand and diversity, and Appendix 5 on the standard circuit
Design Procedures and Examples 131
arrangements. The 16th Edition [Ref 1] has only 6 appendices and
Appendices 4 and 5 of the 15th Edition have been removed. The philosophy
is that the IEE Wiring Regulations [Ref 1] are now more general in their
requirements, giving the designer only the basic requirements and leaving it
to him to decide precisely what is needed.
Referring to the estimation of maximum demands, IEE Regulation 311-01-01
only states that the maximum demand of an installation, expressed in
amperes, shall be assessed and that in determining the maximum demand of
an installation or part thereof, diversity may be taken into account. Table
4A and Table 4B of Appendix 4 of the 15th Edition of the IEE Wiring
Regulations regarding maximum demand and diversity are still available in
the form of ‘Guidance Notes’ [Ref 5, P 101]. However, it should be
understood that the contents of the Guidance Notes will not form part of
the IEE Wiring Regulations for legal purposes.
6.2 DESIGN PROCEDURES
Whether it is a final circuit for lighting, socket outlets or motor, or a
distribution circuit connecting DBs, the basic design procedure is the same.
The recommended design procedures in eight steps given in Table⋅6.2 are
based on the requirements of the IEE Wiring Regulations [Ref 1].
6.2.1 Lighting Circuit
For lighting circuit, the running current of luminaries is not necessarily the
major consideration especially where discharge fittings are used. In
estimating the design current in step 1, the effects of the associated
control gear and harmonics must be considered. Where the circuit is for
discharge lighting and in the absence of more exact information from the
manufacturers, the design current [Ref 5, P 34] can be taken as:
I
lamp rated
B =
×18. wattage
nominal voltage of circuit
The multiplier of 1.8 is based on the assumption that the circuit is
corrected to a power factor of not less than 0.85 lagging, and it takes into
account control gear losses and harmonic currents. The typical power
factor of an uncorrected discharge lamps may vary between 0.5 lead and
0.3 lag [Ref 5, P 35]. Lighting installations should be classified as fixed
systems. The disconnection time (in Step 7) is 5 s for installations within
the equipotential zone.
132 Chapter 6
Table 6.2 Basic Design Procedure
Procedure Design Task Factors under consideration
Step 1 Determine design current, IB.B Connected load, demand factor and
coincidence factor.
Step 2 Select the type and current
rating of protective device, IN.
IB, IB
F such that :
IN > IB, IB
BC > IF
Step 3 Determine the minimum
tabulated current rating, It,min.
It,min = IN / (Ca x Cg x CI ) or
It,min = IB / (Ca x Cg x CI )
Step 4 Select the type of cable and
the current rating such that
It,min ≤ It
It : tabulated current rating
Conductor material, insulation
material, single-or multi-core and
installation methods.
Step 5 Check voltage drop within 4%
from supply intake to individual
appliances. If the voltage drop
exceeds 4%, repeat step 4.
IB, circuit length, power factor,
TVDr, TVDx,and conductor
temperature.
B
Step 6 Check thermal limit of cable
such that
Tbk,3-Phase F < tcable,max
tcable,max =( k
2
S
2
) / IF
2
,3-Phase
Cable thermal constant k, 3-Phase
short-circuit current, time-current
characteristic of protective device.
Step 7 For TN system, check for earth
fault loop impedance ZEFL,TN,
such that during an earth fault,
the protective device will
disconnect supply within the
specified time of either 0.4 s
or 5 s.
Time current characteristic of
protection device, source impedance,
cable resistance, cable reactance
and average conductor temperature
during fault condition.
Step 8 Select the size of CPC such
that
k
tI
S
Ief,bkEF
min ≥
For TT system check for:
Ra x Ia < 50 V.
Ia: the current causing the
automatic disconnection of the
protective device within 5s.
Ra : resistances of the earth
electrode and the CPC.
Earth fault current IEF,, operating
time of protective device.
Thermal limit constant k of CPC.
Resistance of earth electrode.
Smin can also be obtained from
Table 4.1 given in Section 4.3.1.
Design Procedures and Examples 133
6.2.2 Socket-outlet Circuit
Socket-outlet circuits can be fed by either radial or ring circuits. Figure
6.3a shows a radial circuit arrangement and in Figure 6.3b, a ring circuit
utilises one additional conductor to loop back to the sending end. In other
words, the socket outlets in the ring circuit are fed by two parallel
conductors. The sharing of the load between the two parallel conductors
will depend on the load distribution within the ring. For overcurrent
protection, it is assumed that not more than 67% of the total current will
be carried by any part of the ring. Such an assumption is based partly on
experience and partly on a consideration of the likely load distribution in
domestic circuits [Ref 6, P 25]. For other situations, such an assumption
may need to be reviewed.
32A
MCB
32A
MCB
(a) radial (b) ring
Figure 6.3 Radial and ring circuits
Prior to the release of the 15th Edition of the IEE Wiring Regulations in
1981, there were three standard circuit arrangements for socket outlets
and each circuit can only supply to a fixed number of socket outlets. For
example, a radial circuit using an overcurrent protective device of 32 A
with a 4 mm2 copper conductor pvc-insulated cable was allowed to supply to
only six socket outlets. In the 15th Edition of the IEE Regulations, for the
same 32 A standard circuit, it was allowed to supply an unlimited number of
socket outlets but within a floor area of 75 m2. In 1991, the standard
circuit arrangements for socket outlets have been removed from the 16th
Edition of the IEE Wiring Regulations [Ref 1] and the designer has to
decide precisely what is needed.
Example 6.2
Determine the type and current rating of the protective device and the
size of conductors of the circuit feeding a group of ten socket outlets as
shown in Figure 6.4. The length of the cable from the protective device to
the group of the socket outlets is 17 m and the ambient temperature is
350C. The circuit is a single-core, copper conductor, pvc-insulated cable,
clipped direct on a non-metallic surface. The expected average connected
134 Chapter 6
load of each socket outlet is 300 W at 0.9 power factor and the voltage
drop limits in the final circuit are:
(a) 1%, (b) 1.5%.
300W X 10
0.9 p.f.
1C/Cu/pvc clipped direct
17 m350
C
?
Figure 6.4 Circuit for Example 6.2
Solution
(a)
Step 1 :
θcosvoltagerated
loadConnected
IB
×
=
A49.14
9.0230
10300
=
×
×
=
Step 2 : Assume the 3-phase fault current is within 9 kA and thus, an
MCB with a current rating of 16 A is selected.
Step 3 : A02.17
1194.0
16
CCC
I
I
iga
N
min,t =
××
=
××
=
Step 4 : From Table 4D1A of the IEE Wiring Regulation [Ref 1, P 188],
a 2 x 1.5 mm2
cable with It = 20 A is selected.
Step 5 :
1000
lengthIcosTVD
V Br
drop
××
=
θ
V43.6
1000
1749.149.029
=
×××
=
Since Vdrop of 6.43 V (2.8%) is higher than 1%, the next higher rating of
2.5 mm2
is selected.
V99.3
1000
1749.149.018
V 5.2,drop =
×××
=
Since Vdrop of 3.99 V (1.74%) is again higher than 1%, the next higher
rating of 4 mm2
is selected.
V44.2
1000
1749.149.011
V 0.4,drop =
×××
=
Since Vdrop of 2.44 V (1.06%) is still higher than the required 1%, a 6 mm2
cable should be considered. However, the size of 6 mm2
cable will be too
Design Procedures and Examples 135
large to terminate inside the socket outlet. Thus, the group of 10 socket
outlets will be separated into two groups and to be fed by two separate
circuits. Each circuit is protected by a 16 A MCB but the design current is
only half of the previous value. By using a 2.5 mm cable, the voltage drop
will be half of 3.99 V or 1.995 V (0.87%) which is less than the voltage drop
limit of 1%. The recommended circuit arrangement is shown in Figure 6.5(a).
(b) Since the voltage drop limit is 1.5%, the 4 mm2
cable with a voltage
drop of 2.44 V (1.06%) is within the required limit, and thus a 4 mm2
cable
is recommended as shown in Figure 6.5(b).
300W X 5
300W X 5
1C/Cu/pvc clipped direct
1C/Cu/pvc clipped direct
16A
MCB
16A
MCB
2 x 2.5mm 2
17 m
2 x 2.5mm 2
17 m
Figure 6.5(a) Recommended circuit for 1- % voltage drop
1C/Cu/pvc clipped direct
300W X 10
16A
MCB
2 x 4mm 2
17 m
Figure 6.5(b) Recommended circuit for 1.5% voltage drop
6.2.3 Motor Circuit
For motor circuit, the rating of the breaker and cable should be greater
than or equal to the full load current of the motor. Where the motor is
intended for intermittent duty and for frequent stopping and starting, the
conductor size shall be increased to cater for any cumulative effects of
the rise in circuit temperature during the starting periods.
The IEE Regulation 552 states that for every electric motor having a
rating exceeding 0.37 kW shall be provided with a starter incorporating
136 Chapter 6
means of protection against overload of the motor [Ref 1, 552-01-02]. For
a motor circuit, the breaker is installed mainly for switching/isolation
purpose and for short-circuit protection. Thus, it is not necessary for the
breaker to provide overload protection for the cable since built-in overload
protection is provided in the starter [Ref 2, 473-01-04]. Furthermore, the
designer should consider the starting current to ensure that the breaker
will not trip during motor starting.
6.3 EXAMPLES OF A TWO-LEVEL BUILDING
A two-level building which has two shops on each floor is shown in Figure
6.6 and a pump room which has a 55 kW water pump and a 80-kW sprinkler
pump operated by the utility. Each shop has a final DB serving a floor area
of 15 m x 10 m. On each floor, there is a main DB connecting to two final
DBs as shown in Figure 6.6. The connected loads of each shop are as
follows:
♦ 20 units of 40-W fluorescent lighting.
♦ 28 units of 13-A socket outlets with an average connected load of
300 W for each socket outlet at a power factor of 0.9.
♦ One 3-Phase 10-kW compressor motor.
♦ One 3-Phase 15-kW direct-on-line motor.
The power supply to the building is fed from a 22 / 0.4 kV transformer.
The voltage drop limit from the supply intake to the main DB is specified as
1%, from main DB to final DB is 0.5% and from the final DB to each
appliance is 1%. The ambient temperature is 350C. All cables are installed
in trunking and every two circuits are grouped together.
T1T1M1
M1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 1
M1
Figure 6.6 The two-level building
Design Procedures and Examples 137
6.3.1 Final DB
The circuit arrangement and phase connection of the appliances connected
to the final DB in each shop are shown in Figure 6.7.
Socket-outlet Circuits
Red Phase :
A28.21
18.094.0
16
I
A16IA59.11
9.0230
8300
I
min.t
NB
=
××
=
==
×
×
=
Select a circuit using a 16-A MCB with a 2.5 mm2
copper conductor multi-
core pvc-insulated non-armoured cable.
Cable length: L = 4.5 m
Voltage drop: Vdrop = 0.8418 V or 0.36%
Circuit loading: LD = )(I IB Z = × ×11 59 23 0 94 0 8. . . = 67%, IZ = 17.3 A.
Active connected load: CLa = 2.4 kW
Reactive connected load: CLr = 2.4 x (tan (cos-1 0.9)) = 1.16 kVAr.
M
16.5m
12x13A SSO
13.5m8.5m4.5m
21.6m20.6m
8x13A SSO
16.2m
15 kW10 kW
8x13A SSO
B
B
R
3φ
Y
Y
M
T1
3φ
Figure 6.7 Final DB connection and circuit
l h
Yellow phase :
m16.2LA,21.28=IA,16=IA,59.11I mint,NB ==
To meet the required voltage drop limit of not exceeding 1%, a higher
rating circuit of 16-A MCB and a 4 mm2 copper conductor multi-core cable
is selected.
138 Chapter 6
kVAr1.16=CLkW,2.4=CL,51.2%
830x0.94x0.
11.59
=LD%,8.0
drop
V ra==
Blue Phase :
m16.5=LA26.6=IA20A32.17 mint,== NB II
To meet the required voltage drop limit of not exceeding 1%, the required
conductor size exceeds 4 mm2. Thus, we can use a ring circuit of 20-A
MCB and a 4 mm2 copper conductor multi-core cable.
IB = 17.32 A IN = 20 A L = 16.5 m Iz = 45.12 A
Vdrop = 1.415 V or 0.6% LD = 38.4% CLa = 3.6 kW CLr = 1.74 kVAr
Lighting Circuit
Yellow/Blue phase :
A98.7
10.80.94
6
=IA,6IA,13.3
230
8.11040
I mint,NB =
××
==
××
=
Select a circuit using a 6-A MCB and a 1.5 mm2 copper conductor cable.
L=8.5 m, 13.5m Vdrop=0.28%, 0.45% LD=25.2 %, 25.2 %
CLa=40 x 1.8 x 10 x 0.85 = 612 W
CLr = 40 x 1.8 x 10 x 0.85 x tan (cos-10.85) = 379 VAr
For lighting and socket-outlet circuits, it is assumed that the selected
cables can withstand the short-circuit currents. An illustration of checking
whether the cable can withstand the thermal limit during short-circuit
condition is given in the design of the motor circuit.
10 kW Motor
A05.20
8.09.04003
1010
PfEff4003
MotorofoutputNet
I
3
B =
×××
×
=
×××
=
A67.26
18.094.0
05.20
IA25I min,tN =
××
==
Select a circuit using a 25-A MCB and a 4 mm2 copper conductor cable.
L = 20.6 m Vd = 3.139 V or 0.78% LD = 98.7%
CLa = 10/0.9 = 11.11 kW
CLr = 11.11 tan (cos-10.8) = 8.33 kVAr
The motor starting current is assumed to be four times the full load
current which is 80 A during the first 15 s. As the operating time of the
Design Procedures and Examples 139
25-A type C MCB is 50 s, this circuit satisfies the requirement for motor
starting. Based on the estimated 3-phase short circuit current of 1889 A,
the calculated critical time (tcable,max) is 0.06 s. Since the operating time
(tbk,3-Phase,F) of the 25-A MCB is 0.01 s, this circuit satisfies the requirement
in Step 6. This circuit does not satisfy the requirement in Step 4, since
the 25-A MCB will not operate for a current of 1.45 Iz (i.e. 29 A). However,
this is acceptable. Why?
15-kW Motor
A39.99=I32A=IA30.07=I mint,NB
The motor starting current is assumed to be seven times the full load
current which is 210 A during the first 10 s. As the operating time of the
32 A type C MCB is 9 s, the next higher MCB rating which is 40 A is
selected. The operating time of the 40-A MCB is 11 s which is longer than
the required 10 s and is thus acceptable.
L = 21.6 m Vdrop = 1.975 V or 0.5% LD = 87% CLa = 15/0.9 = 16.67 kW
CLr = 12.5 kVAr Tcable,max = 0.09 s tbk,3-Phase,F = 0.01 s If = 3810 A
Since tcable,max is greater than tbk,3-Phase,F, it satisfies the requirement in
Step 6. However, it does not satisfy the requirement in Step 4 since the
40-A MCB will not operate at a current of 1.45 Iz (50 A).
DB Incoming Circuit
Total active connected load :
TCLa = (2.4+2.4+3.6+0.612+0.612+11.11+16.67) kW = 37.4 kW
Total reactive connected load:
TCLr = (1.16+1.16+1.74+0.38+0.38+8.33+12.5) kW = 25.65 kVAr
Power factor = 825.0
4.37
65.25
tancos
P
Q
tancos 11-
=⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛
=⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛ −
Step 1 : Select a demand factor of 0.8. The maximum demand or the
design current of the incoming circuit is
A35.528.0
825.04003
104.37
DF
cos4003
TCL
I
3
a
B
=×
××
×
=
×
××
=
θ
Step 2 : Select both MCCB and RCCB with IN = 63 A
140 Chapter 6
Step 3 : It,min = 63/(0.94 x 0.8) = 83.78 A
Step 4 : Select a 35 mm2
copper conductor, pvc-insulated multi-core cable
in trunking at a length of 18 m.
Iz = 99 x 0.94 x 0.8 = 74.45 A. LD = 70.4%
Step 5 : L = 16.4 m, IB = 52.35 A Vdrop = 0.93 V or 0.23%
Step 6 : At an assumed fault current of 9 kA, tbk,3-Phase,F = 0.01 s and
tcable,max = 0.09 s and thus tbk,3-Phase,F < t cable,max
The single-line diagram for the final DB is shown in Figure 6.8 and the
single-line diagram for the main DB connected to the two final DBs is shown
in Figure 6.9.
Figure 6.8 Single-line diagram of the Final DB T1
Design Procedures and Examples 141
T1
29.9 kW
20.5 kVAr
T1
29.9 kW
20.5 kVAr
4 x 35 mm2
52A (70.4%)
4 x 35 mm2
52A (70.4%)
PVC-CU Multi Non-Arm (0.23%)
PVC-CU Multi Non-Arm (0.23%)
Spare (x2)
MCCB
TPN
100 A
MCCB
TPN
63 A
MCCB
TPN
63 A
MD = 47.87kW,
32.85kVAr
IB = 83.8A
Fig 6.9 Single-line diagram of the main DB M1
6.3.2 Main switchboard
Only three outgoing circuits are required in the main switchboard. The
first circuit is a cable riser connecting the main DB in level 1 and the other
main DB in level 2. The second and third circuits are connected to the 55-
kW water pump and the 80-kW sprinkler pump respectively in the pump
room.
Cable Riser
Using a coincidence factor of 0.9, the maximum demand of the riser is:
A2.170
110.94
160
=I
kA20=IandA,160=IwithMCCBaUse
A8.1501000
4003
59.2+86.17
=I
kVAR59.13=0.9xx 2)(32.85=MD
kW86.17=0.9xx 2)(47.87=MD
mint,
BCN
22
B
r
a
=
××
=×
×
Select a 4 x 50 mm2
single-core, pvc-insulated, copper conductor cable,
installed on cable tray. This circuit has a tabulated current carrying
capacity of 172 A. The voltage drop can be calculated by:
( )
( )
V400of0.26%orV02.1
1000
98.150565.0165.0825.08.0
1000
lengthIinsTVD+cosTVD
V Bxr
drop
=
×××+×
=
××
=
θθ
142 Chapter 6
Water Pump
The design current of the 55-kW water pump is 110.3 A and a MCCB is
selected. Using the same design procedure, we obtain:
kVAr45.83=CLA117.3=I
kW61.11=55/0.9=CLA160=I
rmint,
aN
Select a 4 x 35 mm2
single-core, pvc-insulated, copper conductor cable
which has a tabulated current carrying capacity of 129 A. Based on a
circuit length of 19.5 m, the voltage drop is 2.11 V which is less than the
specified voltage drop tolerance of 1%. Based on the motor starting
current of 441 A, the operating time of the 160 A MCCB is higher than the
required limit of 15 s.
Sprinkler Pump
The design current of the 80-kW sprinkler pump is 160.4 A and a MCCB
rated at 200 A is selected. Based on the It,min of 170.6 A, a 4 x 70 mm2
copper conductor cable is suggested. This cable has a tabulated current
rating of 214 A and the voltage drop is 0.63% at an estimated circuit length
of 29.5 m. Based on the motor starting current of 642 A, the operating
time of the 200-A MCCB is slightly greater than the required limit of 15 s.

Main Incoming Circuit
Select a MCCB as the protective device and based on the coincidence
factor of 0.9, the maximum demand at the main incoming circuit is:
( )
( )
MDa = + + × =
× =
×
× =
86 18 6111 88 89 0 9 212 56
0 9 154
3 400
1000 379
. . . . .
. .46
.3
kW
MD = 59.12+ 45.83+ 66.67 kVAr
I =
212.56 + 154.46
A
I = 400 A
r
B
2 2
N
The single line diagram of the main switchboard is shown in Figure 6.10.
6.3.3 Short-circuit Protection
It is assumed that the main switchboard is fed by a 300 mm2
copper
conductor XLPE multi-core cable from a LV board at a distance of 30 m.
The LV board is fed by a 22/0.4-kV transformer that has a reactance of
0.009 Ω and a resistance of 0.002 Ω. It is also assumed that the 22-kV
Design Procedures and Examples 143
source impedance is negligible and the 300 mm2
XLPE cable has a reactance
of 0.07 mΩ per m and a resistance of 0.08 mΩ per m. The three-phase
short-circuit current at the main switchboard is:
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
A166,19
012.0
230
3000007.0009.03000008.0002.0
230
XXRR
3V
,I
22
2
1T
2
1T
LL
3F
==
×++×+
=
+++
=φ
Thus, all the MCCBs at the main switchboard are recommended to have a
breaking capacity of 20 kA. To verify the thermal limit of cable as stated
in Step 6, the critical operating time of the three outgoing circuits are
calculated as follows:
s18.0
19166
70115
=tpumpSprinkler
s04.0
19166
35115
=tWater pump
s09.0
19166
50115
I
Sk
tRiser
2
22
maxcable,
2
22
maxcable,
2
22
2
F
22
maxcable,
=
×
=
×
=
×
==
Figure 6.10 The main switchboard of the two-level building
144 Chapter 6
The operating time of each of the three MCCBs at a short-circuit current
of 19 kA is 0.01 s which is within the three critical operating times
calculated above. However, if the operating time of the breaker is 0.1 s, the
first and second circuits will not meet the requirement for protection
against short-circuit current.
6.4 EXAMPLE OF A SEVEN-STOREY FACTORY
A seven-storey flatted factory which has four tenants on each floor is
shown in Figure 6.11 and its basic single-line diagram is shown in Figure 6.12.
The first busbar which provides supply to all the tenants is fed by a
22/0.4-kV transformer, the second busbar which provides supply to all the
common services for the whole building such as lighting in the common area,
ventilation fans and exhaust fans, etc. is fed by another 22/0.4-kV
transformer. The third busbar which provides supply to all the emergency
loads such as emergency lighting, fire-fighting equipment, etc. is fed from
either the second busbar or the standby generator when the supply from
the utility fails.
ROOF
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 6
LEVEL 7
Figure 6.12 The basic single-line diagram
G
Busbar 3Busbar 2Busbar 1
400V400V
1MVA1MVA
22 kV
Tenant Tenant
TenantTenantT1
M1 LPEM
T1
T1 T1
Figure 6.11 The seven-storey
building
Design Procedures and Examples 145
On each floor, there is one distribution board M1 connecting to the four
tenants DBs, T1, and another distribution board LP which provides supply to
all the common services in the building, and an emergency distribution
board EM for emergency loads as shown in Figure 6.11. The area of each
floor is 1000 m2
and each tenant occupies a floor area of 200 m2
. The
average floor height is 4.5 m. The maximum demand of each DB is shown in
Table 6.3. All the single loads connected directly to the main busbars are
given in Table 6.4.
Table 6.3 The maximum demand of DB on each floor
DB Maximum Demand Source of Supply
(kW) (kVAr) (Ampere)
M1 134.6 94.2 237 Busbar 1
LP 32.1 20.4 55 Busbar 2
EM 20.1 12.8 34 Busbar 3
AHU 16.67 12.5 30 Busbar 2
Table 6.4 Single loads connected directly to the busbars
Single Load Maximum Demand Floor Source of
(kW) (kVAr) (Ampere)
located Supply
Lift Motor 1 33.3 25.0 60.1 8 busbar 2
Lift Motor 2 33.3 25.0 60.1 8 busbar 2
Chiller 44.4 33.3 80.1 8 busbar 2
Condense Pump 16.7 12.5 30.1 8 busbar 2
Lift Motor 3 33.3 25.0 60.1 8 busbar 3
Lift Motor 4 33.3 25.0 60.1 8 busbar 3
Water Pump 1 22.2 16.7 40.1 1 busbar 2
Water Pump 2 22.2 16.7 40.1 1 busbar 3
Sprinkler Pump 57.88 43.3 104.3 1 busbar 3
6.4.1 Busbar 1
Cable or busway riser can be used to connect from busbar 1 to the main
distribution board M1 at each floor. It is assumed that each riser has a
minimum rating of 225 A and a maximum rating of 800 A. The specified
voltage drop limit is 1% from busbar 1 to each main DB. The designer may
select one riser for each main DB since the maximum demand of each main
DB is 237 A which is higher than the minimum riser size of 225 A. In this
case, it will require seven outgoing circuits which implies seven breakers
146 Chapter 6
with the associated protective devices from busbar 1. On the other hand,
the designer may select one riser connecting to as many main DBs as
possible. As the maximum demand of each main DB is 237 A and the
maximum riser rating is 800 A, the maximum number of main DBs which can
be connected to one riser is three, subjected to the voltage drop
constraints. In this example, three risers are recommended: the first
riser is a cable riser connected to two main DBs at levels 7 and 6, the
second riser is also a cable riser connected to two main DBs at levels 5 and
4 and the last riser is a busway riser connecting to three main DBs at levels
3, 2 and 1. The completed design of busbar 1 is shown in Figure 6.13.
Figure 6.13 The design of busbar 1
6.4.2 Busbar 2
There are five single loads, namely one 20-kW water pump, two 30-kW lift
motors, one 40 kW chiller and one 15 kW condenser pump to be connected
directly from busbar 2. In addition, one distribution board LP and one tap-
off supply for the air handling unit (AHU) are required at each floor to be
Design Procedures and Examples 147
fed from busbar 2. It is also required that the supply for LP and the AHU
should be on two separate risers. As the maximum demand for LP is 55 A,
the designer can supply all the DBs by one riser. Alternatively, the
designer can also provide the supply by using two risers. However, if it is
supplied by more than two risers, each riser will be loaded less than 50% of
the rated capacity and thus, it is not recommended. The maximum demand
of each AHU is 30 A and for the same reason, only one riser is
recommended to supply all the AHUs. The completed design of busbar 2
including the associated protective device for the incoming circuit is shown
in Figure 6.14.
Figure 6.14 The design of busbar 2
6.4.3. Busbar 3
There are four single loads, namely two 30-kW lift motors at the roof, one
20-kW water pump and one 52-kW sprinkler pump at level 1 to be
connected directly from busbar 3. The emergency distribution board EM,
148 Chapter 6
which has a maximum demand of 34 A on each floor should also be fed from
busbar 3. As the demand of EM is low, the designer should select only one
riser from busbar 3. Due to the voltage drop requirement, the current
ratings of the two lift motor circuits are actually much larger than those
required for the full load current only. For emergency loads, as all the
appliances will be required to operate simultaneously, the coincidence
factor of 1.0 is selected. The completed design of busbar 3 is given in
Figure 6.15.
Figure 6.15 The design of busbar 3
6.4.4 Short-Circuit Protection
The impedance of the 22/0.4-kV transformer is normally 5% on 1 MVA
base. The three-phase short-circuit current in per unit of 1 MVA and 0.4
kV base is:
currentp.u.20
05.0
1
I 3,F ==φ
Design Procedures and Examples 149
kA28.86=kA1.44320=I
A1443
1043
101
=currentp.u.1
F,3
3
6
×
=
××
×
φ
It is also assumed that proper interlocking facility is implemented and thus,
the two 22/0.4-kV transformers will never be operated in parallel. Under
this assumption, the breaking capacity of the two ACBs and all the other
MCCBs at busbar 1, busbar 2 and busbar 3 can be 30 kA which is higher
than the critical limit of 28.86 kA.
To verify the thermal limit of cable as stated in Step 6, the critical time of
the first riser from busbar 1 is calculated:
t
k S
Ic
F
= =
×
=
2 2
2
2 2
2
115 500
28860
3 97. s
The value of 3.97 s is much larger than the breaker operating time of
0.01 s and thus, the cable is well protected. However, at busbar 2, the 4 x
16 mm2
circuit to the condenser pump fails to meet this requirement, as the
critical time is less than the breaker’s operating time of 0.01s.
s004.0
28860
16115
I
Sk
t 2
22
2
F
22
c =
×
==
In actual case, the three-phase short circuit current at the roof will be
much lower than 28 kA, and the critical time should be closer to the
breaker operating time of 0.01 s if the impedance of the 4 x 16 mm2
circuit
is considered.
6.4.5 Earth Fault Protection
As the impedance of the 22/0.4-kV transformer is 5% and the typical X/R
ratio of the transformer is 5, the value of the resistance and reactance of
the transformer can be obtained by:
Z R X
R
Z
X R
T T T
T
T
T T
= +
=
+
= =
= × = × =
2 2
2
1 5
5%
26
0 98%
5 5 0 98% 4
.
. .9%
The resistance and reactance in ohms can be obtained by multiplying the
per unit value by the base impedance of 0.16 Ω.
150 Chapter 6
Ω=×=
Ω=×=
0078.0049.016.0X
0016.00098.016.0R
T
T
Let us assume that the earthing of the installation is a TN-S system and
the protective conductor from the transformer neutral to the earthing
terminal of busbar 2 is a 300 mm2
pvc-insulated, copper conductor cable of
25 m length, and the CPC from busbar 2 to the distribution board LP at
level 1 is a 120 mm2
pvc-insulated copper conductor of 5 m length. The
cable riser from busbar 2 to each LP is a 4 x 240 mm2
pvc-insulated, copper
conductor cable as shown in Figure 6.16. The earth fault loop impedance at
DB LP at level 1 is:
( ) ( )Z R R R R R X X X X XEFL T T
where
R R
R
X X
X X
= + + + + + + + + +
=
×
× ×
= =
×
×
=
×
×
= =
×
×
=
=
×
× ×
= =
×
×
=
=
×
×
= =
×
×
=
500 240 120 300
2
500 240 120 300
2
500 240
300
500 240
120 300
0 086 25
3 1000 2
0 00062
016 5
3 1000
0 00046
0 00092
013 25
3 1000
0 0019
0135 25
3 1000 2
0 00098
0 22 5
3 1000
0 00064
0 23 5
3 1000
0 00066
0 22 25
3 1000
0 0032
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
R =
0.32 5
3 1000
120
Ω Ω
Ω Ω
Ω Ω
Ω Ω
ZEFL = +
=
0 0055 0 01328
0 01437
2 2
. .
. Ω
The line-to-earth fault current is:
A006,16
01437.0
230
IEF ==
To verify the size of CPC as stated in Step 8, the minimum cross-sectional
area of the CPC from LP1 to busbar 2 is:
2
Ief,bkEF
min
mm4.35
143
1.0006,16
k
tI
S
=
×
=
≥
Design Procedures and Examples 151
The selected CPC size of 120 mm2
is thus more than the minimum required
size of 35.4 mm2
(step 8).
Fig 6.16 Illustration of earth fault loop impedance at level 1
In the distribution board LP at level 1, there is a socket-outlet circuit of 2
x 4 mm2 copper conductor cable with a 1 x 4 mm2 CPC of 15 m length
protected by a type C 32 A MCB. The resistance values of the phase
conductor and CPC are:
Ω=
Ω=
×
×
=
0825.0R
0825.0
10002
1511
R
4,CPC
4
The earth fault current at the socket outlet is:
( )
A1345
171.0
230
01328.00825.00825.00055.0
230
I
22
LE,F
==
+++
=
For a current of 1345 A, the 32-A MCB will operate within the specified
time of 0.4 s (Step 7). The touch voltage for an earth fault at the
appliance connected to the socket outlet if it is within the earthed
equipotential zone is:
( )
( )
V7.26
32000066.000092.00825.0
320XR+R=
320Z=V
IZ=V
22
2
120,CPC
2
CPC,120CPC,4
CPCt
ACPCt
=
×++=
×+
×
×
The value of 26.7 V is within the maximum limit of 50 V.
LP LP LP
cpc
5 m
5 m
25 m
25 m
4 x 240mm2
7x500mm2
1 x 120mm2
1x300mm2
Busbar 2
152 Chapter 6
6.5 REFERENCES
[1] “Regulations for Electrical Installations”, 16th Edition, IEE, 1991.
[2] CP5 : 1988, “Code of Practice for Wiring of Electrical Equipment of
Buildings”, SISIR, 1988/1995.
[3] P J S Chram, “The National Electrical Code 1987 Handbook”, National
Fire Protection Association, 4th Edition, 1987.
[4] IEEE Standard 241-1983, “IEEE Recommended Practice for Electric
Power Systems in Commercial Buildings”, IEEE, 1983.
[5] “Guidance Note on Selection and Erection”, Guidance Note No. 1, IEE,
1992.
[6] “Guidance Note on Protection against Overcurrent”, Guidance Note No.
6, IEE, 1992.
153
CHAPTER 7
CALCULATIONS OF
SHORT-CIRCUIT CURRENTS
Calculation of short-circuit currents in low-voltage systems is usually
simpler than in high-voltage systems. Certain simplifying assumptions are
made when calculating fault current. An important assumption is that the
fault is shorted through a zero fault impedance. This assumption simplifies
the calculation process and also applies a safety factor since the calculated
values represent the worst case condition. Furthermore, a three-phase
fault is usually assumed as this type of fault generally results in the
maximum short-circuit current in a circuit. The actual fault current is
normally less than the calculated three-phase value since the fault
impedance may always be higher than zero. Line-to-line short-circuit
currents are about 87% of the three-phase fault currents while line-to-
neutral short-circuit currents are also lower than the three-phase fault
currents. For a system with neutral solidly grounded, the line-to-earth
short-circuit currents can range from 60% to 125% of the three-phase
value depending on the construction of the ground-return circuit. However,
the line-to-ground fault currents of more than the three-phase value rarely
occurs in industrial and commercial systems.
Calculation of short-circuit currents at various sections in a low-voltage
system is essential for the proper selection of MCCBs, MCBs, fuses,
busbars and cables. All of these electrical components should withstand
the thermal and magnetic stresses imposed by the maximum possible short-
circuit currents. In addition, circuit breakers and fuses should interrupt
safely these maximum short-circuit currents.
7.1 SOURCES OF FAULT CURRENTS
The basic sources of fault currents are the utility supply system, local
generators, synchronous motors and induction motors. All the running
generators in the utility system contribute to the fault current in a low-
voltage system. However, transmission and distribution lines and
transformers introduce impedances between the utility generators and the
low voltage system. As a result, the contribution of these generators to
the fault current in the low-voltage system is substantially reduced.
Nevertheless, the utility system is still the main source of the fault
154 Chapter 7
currents. The amount of the short-circuit current from the utility system
is normally expressed as the fault level at the service entrance. The value
of the fault level should normally be obtained from the utility. Typical
values of fault level at 22 kV are in the range of 300 MVA to 1000 MVA,
and for 6.6 kV, in the range of 150 MVA to 200 MVA. For intake at 400 V,
the fault level is in the range from 15 MVA to 25 MVA.
Fault current contributed from a local generator decreases exponentially
from a high initial value to a lower steady-state value which is equivalent to
the current generated by a constant voltage behind a variable reactance.
As the generator continues to be driven by its prime mover and to have its
field energised from its exciter, the steady-state value of fault current
will persist. For purposes of fault-current calculations, industry standards
have established three specific names for values of this variable reactance,
namely sub-transient reactance (Xd
”
), transient reactance (Xd
’
) and
synchronous reactance (Xd ). Xd
”
determines the fault current during the
first cycle (up to 0.02 second) after a fault occurs. The reactance
increases to Xd
’
which is used to determine the fault current from 0.5 to 2
seconds. The reactance will then increase to X which determines the
current flow after steady-state condition is reached. In low-voltage
systems, as the protective devices such as MCCBs, MCBs or fuses are
activated mostly within the first cycle by the primary current, X
d
d
”
is
recommended for the calculation of fault current contributed by the local
generator. Typical values for Xd
”
are in the range from 10% to 15% on
generator kVA rating.
The fault current contributed from induction motor is generated by inertia
driving the motor in the presence of a field flux produced by induction
from the stator. Since this flux decays on a loss of the source voltage or
on a substantial reduction of the source voltage during fault, the current
contribution of an induction motor reduces and disappears completely after
a few cycles. In the calculation of the fault current, induction motors are
assigned only a sub-transient reactance Xd
”
. A typical value for Xd
”
is 25%
based on the individual motor kVA rating or on the total kVA of a group of
motors.
7.2 STEP-BY-STEP CALCULATIONS
The example of the fault calculation presented here is based on a 400-V
three-phase system shown in Figure 7.1. The system data shown are typical
of those required to perform the calculations. Bolted three-phase short
Calculations of Short-Circuit Currents 155
circuits at locations F1 and F2 are assumed separately. Resistances are
usually significant and their effect may be evaluated either by a complex
impedance reduction or by separate X and R reductions. The complex
reduction leads to the most accurate solution but the separate X and R
reductions are simpler and more conservative. Thus, the latter is adopted
in all the step-by-step calculations.
7.2.1 Common Base Values
The base MVA is selected as 1 MVA and the base kV as 0.4 kV. The base
impedance and base current can than be obtained as follows :
( )
( )
( )
Base Impedance =
base kV
base MVA
=
(0.4)
1
= 0.16
Base current =
base MVA 1000
base kV
1 1000
0.4 3
1443 A
2 2
Ω
×
×
=
×
×
=
3
Utility Fault Level
The utility fault level is given as 800 MVA with a X/R ratio of 15. The
values for the common base of the equivalent utility resistance (Ru) and
reactance (Xu) can be obtained as follows:
( )
Z
Base MVA
Fault MVA
1
800
0.00125 per unit
since Z = R X and X / R = 15
R =
Z
1+ 15
0.00125
15.033
0.000083 per unit
X = 15 R = 0.00125 per unit
U
U U
2
U
2
U U
U
s
2
U U
= = =
+
= =
×
Transformer Impedance
The 1000 kVA transformer has an impedance of 5.75% on 1000 kVA and
the value of resistance is 1.21%. The reactance can be obtained by
Z R 5.62%2 2
− = .
156 Chapter 7
22KV Fault level = 800MVA
X/R = 15
400 V
500A
TPN
MCCB
500A
TPN
MCCB
4x300mm
Cu/pvc/pvc
(100m)
on cable tray
F1
F2
Motor group M1
400 kVA
630A
TPN
MCCB
1000 kVA
Z = 5.75%
R = 1.21%
Main DB
200A
TPN
MCCB
4x70mm
Cu/pvc/pvc
(30m)
on cable tray
2
Figure 7.1 Sample network
As the transformer rating of 1000 kVA is the same as the base MVA, the
percentage values of the transformer resistance (RT) and reactance (XT)
remain the same.
R 1.21 0.0121 per unit
X = 5.62 0.0562 per unit
T
0
0
T
0
0
= =
=
300mm2 Cable
The resistance and reactance values of the 300 mm2 cable can be obtained
from table 4D1B of the IEE Wiring Regulations. The resistance is (0.00013
Ω) / 3 per m, and the reactance is (0.00014 Ω)/ 3 per m. The per unit
values of resistance (R300c) and reactance (X300c) for 100 m of the 300
mm2
cable can be obtained as follows :
630A
TPN
MCCB
4x400mm
Cu/pvc/pvc
(66m)
on cable tray
Motor group M2
500 kVA
2 2
Calculations of Short-Circuit Currents 157
R
0.00013 100
3 0.16
0.0469 per unit
X =
0.00014 100
3 0.16
0.0505 per unit
300c
300c
=
×
×
=
×
×
=
400 mm2 Cable
The per unit values of the resistance and reactance of the 400 mm2
cable
for a length of 66 m can be obtained as follows :
R
0.000105 66
3 0.16
0.025 per unit
X =
0.00014 66
3 0.16
0.033 per unit
400c
400c
=
×
×
=
×
×
=
70 mm2 Cable
The values of the resistance and reactance of the 70 mm2
cable for a
length of 30 m are:
R
0.00055 30
3 0.16
0.0595 per unit
X =
0.0016 30
3 0.16
0.01732 per unit
70c
70c
=
×
×
=
×
×
=
Motor Groups
The average sub-transient reactance is 25% based on the total rating of a
group of motors. Based on a typical X/R ratio of 6, the resistance is
25%/6 = 4.167%. The values of the equivalent resistance and reactance
converted to the common base for the motor groups M1 and M2 are:
R
0.04167 1000
400
0.1042 per unit
X =
0.25 1000
400
0.625 per unit
R =
0.04167 1000
500
0.0833 per unit
X =
0.25 1000
500
0.5 per unit
M1
M1
M2
M2
=
×
=
×
=
×
=
×
=
158 Chapter 7
7.2.2 Fault at Location F1
The equivalent resistance and reactance networks for the fault at F1 are
shown in Figure 7.2 and Figure 7.3 respectively.
R400c = 0.025
R1 = 0.000083
RT = 0.0121
RM1 = 0.1042 RM2 = 0.0833
R300C = 0.0469
F1
Figure 7.2 Equivalent resistance network for Fault at F1
Figure 7.3 Equivalent reactance network for fault at F1
X1 = 0.00125
XT = 0.0562
XM1 = 0.625 XM2 = 0.5
X300C = X400c = 0.033
F1
The equivalent resistance Req and reactance Xeq are :
( ) ( ) ( )R R R / / R R / / R R
1
1
0.00083 0.0121
1
0.1042 0.0469
1
0.0833 0.025
1
82.08 6.618 9.234
1
97.932
0.01021 per unit
eq u T M1 300c M2 400c= + + +
=
+
+
+
+
+
=
+ +
=
=
Calculations of Short-Circuit Currents 159
( ) ( ) ( )X = X + X / / X + X / / X + X
1
1
0.00125 0.0562
1
0.625 0.0505
1
0.5 0.033
1
17.41 1.48 1.88
0.04814 per unit
eq U T M1 300c M2 400c
=
+
+
+
+
+
=
+ +
=
The equivalent per unit impedance and the fault current at F1 are :
( ) ( )Z R X 0.01021 0.04814 = 0.0492eq,F1 eq
2
eq
2
2 2
= + = + per unit
I
1
0.0492
20.325 per unitf = =
kA29.329=
20.325A4431If1 ×=
The X/R ratio of the system impedance for the fault at F1 is :
X
R
0.04814
0.01021
4.715= =
7.2.3 Fault at Location F2
The equivalent resistance and reactance network for the fault at F2 are
shown in Figure 7.4 and Figure 7.5 respectively.
RU = 0.000083
RT = 0.0121
RM1 = 0.1042
RM2 = 0.0833
R300C = 0.0469
R400c = 0.025
F2
Figure 7.4 Equivalent resistance network for fault at F2
160 Chapter 7
XU = 0.00125
XT = 0.0562
XM1 = 0.625
XM2 = 0.5
X300c = 0.0505
X400c = 0.033
F2
Figure 7.5 Equivalent reactance network for fault at F2
The equivalent resistance Req and reactance Xeq for the fault at F2 are:
unitper0.0372
05785.0
1
0.1042
1
1
0.010950.0469
1
0.1042
1
1
R
))R(R)//RR((R)//R(R
eq
400cM2Tu300cM1eq
=
+
=
+
+
=
+++=
unitper0.0879
0.05190.0505
1
0.625
1
1
=
))X)//(XX(X)//(X(XX 400cM2Tu300cM1eq
=
+
+
+++=
The equivalent impedance Zeq and fault current at F2 are :
unit0.0954 per20.087920.0372)X(2)R(F2eq,Z 2
eqeq =+=+=
Calculations of Short-Circuit Currents 161
I
1
0.0954
10.48 per unit currentF2,p.u. = =
I 1443 10.48
= 15.123kA
F2 = ×
The X/R ratio of the system impedance for the fault at F2 is :
X
R
0.0879
0.0372
2.36= =
7.3 SYSTEMATIC CALCULATION BY COMPUTER
By referring to the same common base, the sample network can be re-
arranged to a network consisting of 4 nodes and 3 lines as shown in Figure
7.6(a). The complex impedance network in Figure 7.6(a) can also be re-
arranged to a simplified impedance network by using Z R X2 2
= + for
each circuit element as shown in Figure 7.6(b). The admittance matrix
(called Y-matrix) can then be formulated for the 4-node system as follows :
y11
1
0.05875
1
0.06892
1
0.0414
1
0.06197
71.82
y12
- 1
0.0689
- 14.51 y13
- 1
0.0414
= - 24.15
y14
- 1
0.0620
- 16.14
y22
1
0.0689
1
0.6336
16.09
y33
1
0.0414
1
0.5069
26.12
y44
1
0.0620
16.14
= + + + =
= = =
= =
= + =
= + =
= =
The Y-matrix and the inverted Y-matrix are as follows:
Y
71.820 14.510 24.150 16.140
14.510 16.090 0.000 0.000
24.150 0.000 26.120 0.000
16.140 0.000 0.000 16.140
=
− − −
−
−
−
⎡
⎣
⎢
⎢
⎢
⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥
⎥
⎥
⎥
162 Chapter 7
Y 1
0.0493 0.0444 0.0456 0.0493
0.0444 0.1022 0.0411 0.0444
0.0456 0.0411 0.0804 0.0456
0.0493 0.0444 0.0456 0.1113
− =
⎡
⎣
⎢
⎢
⎢
⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥
⎥
⎥
⎥
Figure 7.6(a) Complex Representation
Let z11 denotes the first diagonal element, z22 the second diagonal
element and znn the last diagonal element of the inverse of the Y-matrix.
The total fault current at any particular node (say node q) can be obtained
by 1/zqq. Thus, the fault current for the fault at location F1 can be
obtained by :
kA29.264unitper20.28
0.0493
1
z
1
I
11
F1 ====
The fault current at location F2 is:
kA14.113unitper9.78
0.1022
1
z
1
I
22
F2 ====
Similarly, the fault current at node 3 is 1/z33 and at node 4 is 1/z44. In
addition, the distribution of the fault currents can also be calculated. The
computational flow chart is shown in Figure 7.7. A display of the total fault
current and its distribution in amperes for a fault at node 1 through node 4
are shown in Figure 7.8 through Figure 7.11 respectively.
R300C
X300C
R70C
X70C
RM1
XM1
R400C
X400C
RM2
XM2
RU + RT
XU + XT
1
2 3 4
Calculations of Short-Circuit Currents 163
Z70C = 0.0620
1
2 3 4
Figure 7.6(b) Simplified Representation
These calculated fault currents are slightly lower than the values obtained
by the step-by-step calculation using the separate X and R reduction. If
more accurate values are required, the Y-matrix should be formulated as a
complex matrix and inverted using the complex representation.
Formulate Y Matrix
Compute Post Fault Voltage : V
Z
Zi
f iq
qq
= 1 −
Compute Total Fault Current : i
Zq
qq
=
1
Read Bus Data and Line Data
Compute [ ]Y −1
Compute Post Fault Current : I
V V
V
F
F F
12
1 2
12
=
−
STOP
Figure 7.7 Computational flow chart
ZU + ZT = 0.05875
Z300C
= 0.0689 Z400C
= 0.0414
ZM1 = 0.6336 ZM2 = 0.5069
164 Chapter 7
Figure 7.8 Total Fault current for a 3-phase fault at each node
Figure 7.9 Fault current distribution for fault at node F2 (14.438 kA)
Figure 7.10 Fault current distribution for fault at node M2 (18.254 kA)
Calculations of Short-Circuit Currents 165
Figure 7.11 Fault current distribution for fault at node F1 (29.317 kA)
7.4 A CASE STUDY
The electricity supply to a high-rise luxurious apartment is fed by a 1 MVA
22/0.4-kV transformer located on the ground floor of the building. The
schematic diagram of part of the electrical installation is shown in
Figure 7.12. As some of the distribution boards on the lower floors are
closer to the transformer, the fault level at these apartment DBs will be
high. However, by mistake, the contractor has installed the M6 MCBs in
all the apartment DBs. Since the M6 MCBs have a breaking capacity of 6
kA, the utility company insisted all the MCBs be replaced with M9 MCBs
which have a breaking capacity of 9 kA. This case study was conducted to
examine whether the replacement of MCB was essential or not.
In the fault current calculation, all the utility’s generators are
represented by a single equivalent impedance. The impedance value is
determined by an assumed fault level of 1000 MVA at 22 kV. This is a
very conservative assumption as the switchgear at 22 kV is rated at
1000 MVA. The impedance of the 22-kV/LV transformer is assumed as
5%. For the entire three-phase network, per-unit values are used to
determine the three-phase fault current. For the single-phase network,
the representation of system elements is in ohm which provides an easier
and more straight-forward calculation. Two different methods are
illustrated and compared.
7.4.1 Method A
The single-phase representation of a three-phase balanced system uses
per-phase impedances and the line-to-neutral system driving voltage. All
166 Chapter 7
calculations up to the floor DB use per-unit values for impedances and
voltages. However, from the floor DB to each apartment DB, impedances
in ohms and voltages in volts are used to determine the fault current for
the line-to-neutral short-circuit. All the cable impedances are based on
Table 4D1B of the IEE Wiring Regulations using half of the single-phase
tabulated voltage-drop constant as the per-phase per-metre cable
impedance.
2 x 35 mm2 Cu/PVC cable in trunking
DB1
DB2
DB3
DB4
Apartment DBs
8 m
14 m
21 m
31 m
100A DP
MCCB
250A
TPN
MCCB
(Floor DB)
250A
TPN
First
tap-off unit
400A
TPN
MCCB
1600A
TPN
ACB
400 V
22 kV
1 MVA
5 %
Fault level = 1000MVA
4 x 120 mm2
Cu/PVC/PVC on cable tray, 2m
4 x 300 mm2
Cu/PVC/PVC
on cable tray,
28m
7 x 500 mm2 Cu/PVC/PVC
in cable trench, 10m
Figure 7.12 Schematic diagram of the electrical installation
For the per-unit calculation, values of the base MVA and base kV are as
follows:
( ) ( )
( )
At 22 kV : Base MVA = 1 MVA Base kV = 22 kV
At 400 V : Base MVA = 1 MVA Base kV = 400 V
Base Impedance =
base kV 2
base MVA
0.4 2
1
0.16
Base current =
base MVA 1000
3 base kV
1000
3 0.4
1443 A
V = 400 / 3 230.9 V 231 VLN
= =
=
×
=
= =
Ω
Calculations of Short-Circuit Currents 167
For a fault level of 1000 MVA at 22 kV, the per-unit impedance (Z) is:
Z =
1
1000
0.001 p.u.=
Fault Current at Transformer LV Terminal
The equivalent circuit for the fault at the transformer LV terminal is
shown in Figure 7.13.
T/F ImpedancePUB Equivalent
Impedance
0.001 p.u. 0.05 p.u.
V = 1.0 p.u.
IF
Figure 7.13 Equivalent circuit at LV terminal
The three-phase fault current at LV terminal is :
I . =
1
0.001+ 0.05
1
0.051
19.61 p.u. current
I 1443 x 19.61= 28,297 A
F, LV, p. u
F,LV
= =
=
Fault Current at the Main Switchboard
The per-phase impedance of the 7 x 500 mm2 pvc-insulated copper
conductor cable in a cable trench (installation method 1, 10 m and two
cables per phase) is:
Z 0.185 0.5 10 10 0.5
0.0004625
500
3
= × × × ×
=
−
Ω
Ω
Z . =
0.0004625
0.16
0.002891 p.u.500, p. u
=
The equivalent circuit for the fault at the main switchboard is shown in
Figure 7.14 and the three-phase fault current at the main switchboard is :
I . =
1
0.001 + 0.05 + 0.002891
18.556 p.u.F, MS, p. u
=
A26,776=18.556A1443=I MSF, ×
168 Chapter 7
0.002891 p.u.0.05 p.u.0.001 p.u.
Figure 7.14 Equivalent circuit at the main switchboard
Fault Current at First Tap-off Unit
The per-phase impedance of the 4 x 300 mm2 pvc-insulated copper
conductor cable on a cable tray (installation method 11, 28 metres) is :
Z300 = 0.22 x 0.5 x 28 x 10-3 Ω = 0.00308 Ω
Z
.
=
0.00308
0.16
0.01925 p.u.
300, p. u
=
The equivalent circuit for the fault at the first tap-off unit is shown in
Figure 7.15 and the three-phase fault current at the first tap-off is :
I =
1
0.001+ 0.05 + 0.002891+ 0.01925
F,TAP1,p.u.
=
1
0.07314
13.6724 p.u.=
I 1443 x 13.6724 = 19,729 AF,TAP1 =
Figure 7.15 Equivalent circuit at the first tap-off unit
Impedance of
500 mm2 cable
IF
V = 1.0 p.u.
Impedance of
300 mm2 cable
0.002891 p.u.0.05 p.u.0.001 p.u.
V = 1.0 p.u.
0.01925 p.u.
IF
Calculations of Short-Circuit Currents 169
Fault Current at Floor DB
The per-phase impedance of the 4 x 120 mm2 pvc-insulated copper
conductor cable on cable tray (installation method 11, 2 metre) is :
Z120 = 0.41 x 0.5 x 2 x 10-3 Ω = 0.00041 Ω
Z
0.00041
0.16
0.0025625 p.u.120,p.u. = =
The equivalent circuit for fault at the floor DB is shown in Figure 7.16 and
the three-phase fault current at the floor DB is:
I
.
1
0.001 0.05 0.002891 0.01925 0.0025625
1
0.757
13.21 p.u.
F, DBF, p. u
=
+ + + +
= =
A19,062=13.21A1443I DBFF, ×=
Impedance of
120 mm2 cable
0.002891 p.u.
0.05 p.u.0.001 p.u.
V = 1.0 p.u.
0.01925 p.u. 0.025625 p.u.
IF
Figure 7.16 Equivalent circuit floor DB
Fault Current at Apartment DB
To calculate the line-to-neutral short-circuit current at each apartment
DB, the line-to-neutral voltage behind an internal impedance from each
apartment DB to the utility infeed is applied. The equivalent circuit is
shown in Figure 7.17.
Impedance of
35 mm2 cable
Equivalent Impedance
from the floor DB
to utility infeedVLN
IF
Figure 7.17 Equivalent circuit at apartment DB by method A
170 Chapter 7
The equivalent impedance from the floor DB to the supply intake at 22 kV
is :
Z
V
I
231
19,062
0.01212eq,DBF
LN
F,DBF
= = = Ω
The impedances of the 2 × 35 mm2
pvc-insulated copper conductor cables in
trunking (installation method 3, 8 m for DB1, 14 m for DB2, 21 m for DB3,
and 31 m for DB4) are:
Z 1.3 0.5 8 10 0.0052
Z 1.3 0.5 14 10 0.0091
Z 1.3 0.5 21 10 0.01365
Z 1.3 0.5 31 10 0.02015
DB1
3
DB2
3
DB3
3
DB4
3
= × × × =
= × × × =
= × × × =
= × × × =
−
−
−
−
Ω
Ω
Ω
Ω
The fault current at the four apartment DBs are :
I
231
0.01212 0.0052 0.0052
10,258 AF,DB1 =
+ +
=
I
231
0.01212 0.0091 0.0091
7,619 AF,DB2 =
+ +
=
I
231
0.01212 0.01365 0.01365
5,860 AF,DB3 =
+ +
=
I
231
0.01212 0.02015 0.02015
4,407 AF,DB4 =
+ +
=
7.4.2 Method B
In method A, the three-phase fault level at the floor DB is calculated first,
and then a single-phase equivalent is used to calculate the fault level at
each apartment DB. As the main focus of the analysis is to estimate the
fault level for line-to-neutral at each apartment DB and not to estimate
the fault level at other locations, the more accurate method should be
based on a single-phase equivalent at the LV terminal of the 22 kV/LV
transformer.
As the three-phase fault level at the transformer’s LV terminal has been
calculated as 28,297 A in section 7.4.1, the single-phase equivalent
impedance at the LV terminal can be expressed as :
Z
V
I
231
28,297
0.00817eq,LV
LN
F,LV
= = = Ω
Calculations of Short-Circuit Currents 171
The equivalent circuit for the line-to-neutral short-circuit at the
apartment DB is shown in Figure 7.18.
1 x 120mm2
1 x 35mm2
1 x 35mm2
1 x 300mm2
2 x 500mm2
Equivalent
source
impedance at
T/F LV
terminal
0.00817Ω
VLN
1 x 120mm2
1 x 300mm2
Figure 7.18 Equivalent circuit at apartment DB by method B
The per-phase impedance of the 500 mm2 cable has to be divided by two as
there are two cables per-phase, however, division is not necessary for the
neutral cable as there is only one 500 mm2 cable for the neutral. The per-
phase impedance in ohms for each cable which has been calculated from
section 7.4.1 is summarized in Table 7.1.
The total cable impedance from the transformer’s LV terminal to the floor
DB during a line-to-neutral short-circuit at the apartment DB is :
Z 0.0004625 0.000925 2 (0.00308 0.00041) 0.008368DBF = + + × + = Ω
The fault current at each apartment DB can thus be calculated by :
I
231
Z Z 2 Z
231
0.00817 0.008368 2 Z
F,DB
eq,LV DBF 35
35
=
+ + ×
=
+ + ×
The line-to-neutral source impedance at each apartment DB and the fault
currents are summarized in Table 7.2.
7.4.3 Accuracy and Comparison
For the exact calculation, cable impedance should not be added directly as
the impedance Z is a complex quantity containing the resistance R and
reactance X expressed in the form of R + jX. The resistance and
reactance must be added separately and then Z can be computed by
Z = R XT T
22
+ . The approximate approach by adding all the
impedances will result in slightly higher total impedance and thus the
calculated fault current can be slightly lower.
1 x 500mm2
IF
172 Chapter 7
Table 7.1 Summary of Cable Impedance
Cable size (mm2
) Cable length (m) Impedance (ohm)
2 × 500 10 0.0004625
1 × 500 10 0.000925
1 × 300 28 0.00308
1 × 120 2 0.00041
1 × 35 8 0.0052
1 × 35 14 0.0091
1 × 35 21 0.01365
1 × 35 31 0.02015
Table 7.2 Line-to-Neutral Fault Current at each DB
Location Cable length (m) Source Impedance (Ω) * Fault Current (A)
DB1 8 0.02694 8,575
DB2 14 0.03474 6,649
DB3 21 0.04384 5,269
DB4 31 0.05684 4,064
* The equivalent source impedance is (Zeq,LV + ZDBF + 2×Z35) Ω
Table 7.3 Fault Current Calculated by Two Methods
Type of Fault Location Method A Method B
3-phase T/F LV Terminal 28, 297 28, 297
3-phase Main Busbar 26, 776 -
3-phase First tap-off Unit 19, 729 -
3-phase Floor DB 19, 062 -
L - N Apartment DB1 10, 258 8, 575
L - N Apartment DB2 7, 619 6, 649
L - N Apartment DB3 5, 860 5, 269
L - N Apartment DB4 4, 407 4, 064
To determine only the line-to-neutral short-circuit current at the
apartment DB, results obtained by method A are not recommended. For a
line-to-neutral short-circuit, the fault current returns from the faulted
point through each section of the neutral conductors up to the LV terminal
of the 22 kV/LV transformer. By calculating a 3-phase fault level at the
floor DB and then transferring to a single-phase equivalent source
impedance at the floor DB may not represent accurately the line-to-neutral
short-circuit at the apartment DB. Thus, the results obtained by method B
that utilises a single-phase equivalent source impedance at the LV terminal
of the 22 kV/LV transformer are recommended. The calculated fault
currents by the two methods are summarised in Table⋅7.3.
173
CHAPTER 8
COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN
AND SIMULATION
For many years, the design of electrical installations in buildings has been
done manually. The work involved is rather tedious, time consuming and
repetitive in nature. The designers may not have the time and resources to
make a complete check on every item of the installation designed by them.
With the availability of computer facilities, the design, calculation,
modelling and checking processes can be done in a more efficient and
effective manner. Building structure and the large volume of design
elements such as various types of cables and their installation methods,
various types of circuit breakers and their time-current characteristics,
can now be streamlined into a record structure. Technical analysis,
assessment and costing can all be done by computers. The presentation of
the completed design in a single-line diagram can also be automated.
8.1 DESIGN ELEMENT REPRESENTATION
During the design process, instead of referring to various cable tables,
catalogues for various types of breakers, etc., a computer-aided design
(CAD) package, which normally provides one master file or many structured
files to store all the design elements, may be used. These files contain all
the required technical specifications and unit cost for all the electrical
parts including various types of cables, busways, busbars, meters and a
whole range of breakers. Facilities are normally provided for the designer
to update and/or add on new elements to the relevant design element files
whenever required. During runtime and at each design stage, through the
interactive dialogue with the designer, the CAD package will select the
relevant files and display a number of records, with the relevant technical
specifications, for the required design element.
Cable Data
In a typical CAD package, VipTein [Ref. 1], most of the cable tables in
Appendix 4 of the IEE Wiring Regulations [Ref. 2] are grouped according to
the installation methods, conductor material, insulation material, and the
cable construction methods. They are classified into twelve element files
for copper conductor cables, two element files for mineral insulated copper
conductor cables (MICC) and another twelve element files for aluminium
174 Chapter 8
conductor cables. These files are named and referred according to the
definition as shown in Table 8.1.
Table 8.1 Cables File Identification
Installation Methods Conductor and
Insulation Material
Construction
M1 Clipped direct D Copper/pvc 1 Single-core non-armoured
M3 Conduit/Trunking E Copper/XLPE 2 Multi-core non-armoured
M11 Cable Tray J Copper/MICC 3 Single-core armoured
M12 Free air 4 Multi-core armoured
For example, file M1D1 refers to the cable element file for copper
conductors, pvc-insulated, clipped direct, single-core non-armoured cables.
File M11D4 refers to the cable element file for copper conductors, pvc-
insulated, installed on tray, multi-core-armoured cables. For each cable
element file, each record contains the size of the conductor’s cross-
sectional area, current rating, voltage drop constant, R value, X value and
the cable cost per metre for both the single-phase cable and three-phase
cable. Figure 8.1 shows 3 pop-up windows for selection of cable types and
installation methods. Figure 8.2 shows a pop-up window containing the
technical parameters of four relevant sizes of cables, together with
another pop-up window indicating the voltage drop of the cable under
consideration. The declaration of the cable data structure in Turbo Pascal
is shown in Figure 8.3.
Breaker Data
Breakers are grouped under six element files, namely air circuit-breaker
(ACB), single-phase MCB (MCB1), three-phase MCB (MCB3), moulded case
circuit-breaker (MCCB), single-phase RCCB (RCCB1), and three-phase RCCB
(RCCB3). In the breaker element files, each record contains the current
rating, voltage rating, breaking capacity, type of instantaneous tripping,
unit cost, thermal tripping time constants A and B, and the value of
instantaneous tripping current. A typical display of short-circuit protection
test with breaker tripping curves are shown in Figure 8.4. The declaration
of the breaker data structure in Pascal is shown in Figure 8.5.
Other Data
There are two element files for busbars, one element file for busway
systems and one element file for standby generators. Typical number of
records in each element file may vary from 20 records in the generator file
to 150 records in the breaker element file.
Computer-aided Design and Simulation 175
Figure 8.1 Selection of cable types and installation methods
Figure 8.2 Selection of cable sizes
176 Chapter 8
SpecRec = record
i, r, x : real;
End;
Cable_rec = record
Xsectarea : real; (* e.g. 25 mm2
*)
Costpm : real; (* e.g. $8 per m *)
S_pu : SpecRec; (* e.g. i = 126 A, r = 1.75mΩ/m, x = 0.2mΩ/m for Single-phase *)
T_pu : SpecRec; (* e.g. i = 112 A, r = 1.50mΩ/m, x = 0.175mΩ/m for 3-phase *)
End;
Figure 8.3 Declaration of cable data structure in Pascal
Figure 8.4 Short-circuit protection test with breaker tripping curves
Brk_rec = record
IRating : integer; (* e.g. 63 A *)
VRating : integer; (* e.g. 415 V *)
Bkcap : byte; (* e.g. 9 kA *)
CBType : str3; (* e.g. Type3 *)
Cost : real; (* e.g. $61.00 *)
Curve_A : real; (* e.g. 119.2 *)
Curve_B : real; (* e.g. 190.0 *)
IMax : real; (* e.g. 630 A Instantaneous tripping current *)
End;
Figure 8.5 Declaration of breaker data structure in Pascal
Computer-aided Design and Simulation 177
8.2 DESIGN METHODS AND DESIGN FILES
Prior to the design of an electrical installation, the designer has to know
the types of load, the wattage, the power factor, and the physical location
of each connected load, the floor plan, the number of floors and the height
of each floor. A normal CAD package should provide dedicated file
structure for the designer to specify the building structure and the
specifications of various types of load in the building. A CAD package
should be able to display the layout of the building and enable the designer
to zoom in and out to complete the design of the whole electrical
installation.
Design Methods
Basically, there are two design methods [Ref. 3] commonly used in a CAD
implementation. Design method 1 is based on the standard design files
which are summarised from a large pool of proven designs and grouped
under different categories, such as commercial complex, condominium,
multi-storey flatted factory and high-rise domestic flat. The designer may
display, alter, delete or insert new circuits/DBs, and copy the completed
design to a new design file.
Design method 2 is normally based on a computer dialogue. It is used when
the designer’s idea is very much different from the standard design files.
This method involves the design of all the final DBs, main DBs and the main
switchboard. The design work is initiated circuit by circuit starting from a
final DB. Based on the specified connected load, the CAD package
calculates the design current and determines the type of breaker, breaker
ratings, cable type, installation method, cable size, circuit length, voltage
drop, etc. At each stage, the design current is shown and the designer has
an option to overwrite the value selected by the package. In such case, a
list of appropriate values will be displayed and the designer may select the
appropriate value at his own discretion.
Design File
The completed design for a particular building should be stored in a master
design file or several related design files. Normally, it is divided into two
sections, namely, the main switchboard and the distribution boards. The
specifications of the main switchboard can be stored in one file which
contains the building information and the specifications of the incoming
circuit and every outgoing circuits. The distribution board sections may
178 Chapter 8
consist of many small files. Each file stores the specification of one
distribution board.
Each outgoing circuit of the main switchboard may be connected to a
distribution board or a directly connected load such as water pump, fire
pump, etc. If it is connected to a DB, the connection identification refers
to the file name of the connected DB, such as M1, T1, etc. If it is
connected to a load, the connection identification refers to the name of
the directly connected load such as water pump, sprinkler pump, etc. The
specification of each incoming and outgoing circuit in the main switchboard
or in the DB files contains the busbar identification, feeder position
identification, cable specification (cable filename and record number),
breaker specification (breaker filename and record number), the maximum
demand in watts and VArs, etc.
For example, if the completed design for a shophouse is identified as SH1,
the filename of the main design file will be SH1.DES. If there are two
types of DBs, namely M1 and T1 connected at the outgoing circuit from the
main switchboard, the design files of the two DBs are M1.SH1 and S1.SH1.
A sample main design file SH1.DES of a two-storey shophouse is shown in
Figure 8.6, distribution board design file, M1.SH1 in Figure 8.7 and another
distribution board design file, T1.SH1 in Figure 8.8.
8.3 ASSESSMENT AND COSTING
The assessment and costing of the completed design can also be integrated
to the CAD implementation. Based on the completed design files, the
assessment module usually includes load simulation to estimate the loading
of each individual circuit to detect overcurrent; voltage drop simulation to
identify those circuits which have their voltage drop exceeding the
specified tolerance; and fault level calculations to verify that all the
breakers have adequate breaking capacity and that all the circuits can
withstand the short-circuit currents. It may also include verification of
discrimination among various protective devices and the checking with the
recommended code of practice and regulations [Ref.4].
Based on the design files, the costing module gives the overall cost with
breakdown for each category, such as circuit breakers, busbars, cables,
DBs, etc. The costing module normally adds up the project cost by going
through the material cost and installation cost of each category. The
program commences with the first category and checks through the design
Computer-aided Design and Simulation 179
files circuit by circuit for all the items to obtain the total cost for the
first category. It then proceeds to the next category until the end of the
last category. A sample printout [Ref. 4] of the costing module for a
particular design, XYZ.DES is shown in Figure 8.9.
SH10 0.0 2 4.5
1 1
0 Gen
1 CuBbar 5 P2 1 2 0 0 203940 151760 MCCB104
1 1 BUSWAY 0 MCCB 64 76600 56120 2
MCCB 52 1 47874 35077 D M1
MCCB 52 2 47874 35077 D M1
1 2 M1D1 7 MCCB 64 61111 45833 0
0 1 61111 45833 S WATER PUMP
1 3 M1D1 9 MCCB 74 88889 66667 0
0 1 888889 66667 S SPRINKLER PUMP
*** File List ***
S1.SH1
M1.SH1
Figure 8.6 Main design file SH1.DES for a shophouse
M1 4
M3D1 0 MCCB 52 RCCB 2 2
4 MCCB 30 M1D1 6 1 29921 21923 T D T1
4 MCCB 30 M1D1 6 1 29921 21923 T D T1
Figure 8.7 DB design file M1.SH1
T1 5
M3D1 0 MCCB 30 RCCB3 6 5 2
1 MCB1 40 M3D1 2 6 300 145 R S 6x13A SSO
1 MCB1 M1D1 0 0 0 Y S SPARE
1 MCB1 M1D1 0 0 0 B S SPARE
1 MCB1 40 M3D1 1 8 300 145 R S 8x13A SSO
1 MCB1 40 M3D1 2 8 300 145 Y S 8x13A SSO
1 MCB1 40 M3D1 2 6 300 145 B S 6x13A SSO
1 MCB1 8 M3D1 0 10 61 38 R S 10x40W FLU FTG
1 MCB1 8 M3D1 0 10 61 38 Y S 10x40W FLU FTG
1 MCB1 M1D1 0 0 0 B S SPARE
4 MCB3 72 M3D1 3 1 11111 8333 T S COMPRESSOR
4 MCB3106 M3D1 4 1 16667 12500 T S DOL MOTOR
Figure 8.8 DB design file T1.SH1
8.4 AUTOMATIC DRAFTING
Most of the electrical consultants use AutoCAD for the drafting of the
single-line diagrams, and there is currently no convenient means to link the
AutoCAD diagrams to various design calculations, technical assessment and
costing. Another approach is to complete the design, assessment and
180 Chapter 8
costing as described in Section 8.2 first, and then by making use of the
design files, the package generates automatically the single-line diagram of
the completed design on a large plotter [Ref. 4].
Figure 8.9 Sample print out from the costing module
In the second approach, a file transfer module is required to extract data
from the design files and rearrange them in the order in which they can be
plotted efficiently. The file transfer module reads the design files, e.g.
SH1.DES, M1.SH1, T1.SH1, and creates a drawing file with a file extension
DRW, e.g. SH1.DRW. The drafting module reads the drawing file and
produces the required single-line diagram on an A1 or A0-sized plotter.
Based on the number of main busbars, the number of floors of the building,
number of outgoing circuits in each main busbar, etc., the drafting module
calculates the space required and positions the X and Y co-ordinates of
each outgoing feeder at the respective floor level. It plots the first
Computer-aided Design and Simulation 181
incoming main busbar on the left-hand side of the paper and the subsequent
incoming main busbar towards the right. It then plots each outgoing circuit
according to the automatically calculated positions. If a feeder is
connected to a DB, the program will test whether there is enough space for
plotting the details of all outgoing feeders connected to this DB. If the
space is adequate, the details will be plotted, otherwise it will append all
the data of the outgoing circuits of the DB to a second- page drawing file
with a file extension DR2, such as SH1.DR2. The DR2 file will be plotted on
the second page. This algorithm will be repeated on another feeder until
the first page of the single-line diagram is completed.
The program then searches through the second-page drawing file, e.g.
SH1.DR2, and displays all the names of the DBs which have not been plotted
on the first page. The designer may select all or any combination of the
DBs to be plotted on the second page. Based on the number and the sizes
of the selected DBs, the program calculates the size and determines
dynamically, the space for each DB and plots all the selected DBs on the
second page [Ref. 4].
The required symbols and standard drawing elements are grouped into two
categories, namely the discrete drawing elements and the integrated
drawing elements. The discrete drawing elements are the simple electrical
symbols such as MCCB, ACB, busbar, cable, CT, fuse, transformer, starter,
etc. The integrated drawing elements are more elaborate symbols
consisting of a combination of several discrete drawing elements. The
typical integrated drawing elements are the type 1 incoming busbar, type 2
incoming busbar, emergency busbar with generator, main distribution
board, etc. A sample plot of the integrated element of the type 1 incoming
busbar is shown in Figure 8.10.
8.5 SIMULATION TESTS
Although there are standard rules used to guide the design of an
installation, it is always difficult for the designer to visualise how well the
design has been done. One may have to wait until the installation has been
completed and observed for a number of years before a fair decision can
be made. A more comprehensive CAD package, such as MIPTEIN [Ref. 1],
however, provides a series of simulation tests which model the normal
loading, overloading and short-circuit conditions so that the designer can
visualise the performance of the installation under various simulated
182 Chapter 8
conditions, and experience the consequences due to the design errors.
There are altogether six simulation tests to be carried out for each circuit
in the whole installation.
Figure 8.10 A sample plot of an integrated element
Breaker and Cable Load Test
The Breaker load test checks whether the design current, IB, exceeds the
protective device’s current rating, IN. The breaker loading is defined as
(IB/In) x 100%. If this value is less than 100%, the breaker load test will
indicate a pass, “BK (P)”. On the other hand, “BK (F)” will be displayed if the
design current is greater than the protective device’s nominal current.
The cable load test checks whether the current carrying capacity of the
conductor, under a particular installation condition, is greater than the
design current. This test gives an indication whether the conductor will be
overloaded under normal loading condition.
The Cable loading is defined as (IB/Iz) x 100%. If the cable loading is less
than 100%, “L (P)” is displayed. While “L (F)” indicates that the design
current is greater than the conductor current rating under the particular
installation methods. The display of breaker and cable loading test is shown
Computer-aided Design and Simulation 183
in Figure 8.11. Based on the current rating of the protective device (IN), it
detects whether IN > IB and IZ > IB. Circuit loading (IB/IZ) in percentage of
the rated capacity under the specified conditions is also calculated and
circuit loading exceeding 100% is considered as fail and highlighted.
Figure 8.11 shows a cable loading failure (108% in red) for circuit 4 and a
breaker failure ( IN = 16 A < IB = 17.32 A) in circuit 5.
At the incoming circuit, the summation of the maximum demand of all the
outgoing circuits is calculated as 21.85 kW and 13.99 kVAr. Based on a
demand factor of 0.8, the maximum demand at the incoming circuit is
18.42 kW. Based on the calculated power factor of 0.8421, the design
current is calculated as 31.57 A. As the incoming MCB is rated at 63 A, it is
thus shown as ‘’ Incoming Breaker Test (P)” for the incoming circuit at the
bottom on Figure 8.11.
Figure 8.11 Cable utilisation test
Overload Protection Test
For overload protection test, the load current in each circuit is increased
to 145% of the cable rated capacity and the operating time of the breaker
protecting the circuit is modelled. If the operating time is less than two
hours, it is considered to have passed the test. If it does not trip (i.e. it
has a tripping time exceeding 2 hours), it is considered to have failed the
overload protection test, and the circuit will be highlighted. For the
184 Chapter 8
overload protection test as shown in Figure 8.12, the second circuit fails
since the breaker protecting this circuit will not trip within 2 hours when
the cable is overloaded to 145%. Circuits 1, 5 and 6 have adequate
protection against overloading within 56.65%, 38.96% and 11.51%
respectively shown in Figure 8.12. For a special case, a circuit connected
directly to a motor may fail the overload protection test such as circuits 3
and 4. However, it is still considered acceptable and shown as ‘(OK!)’ in
Figure 8.12 as long as each motor is equipped with a built-in overload
protection in the starter.
Figure 8.12 Overload protection test
Voltage Drop Test
Based on the load current, method of installation, type and size of the
cable in each circuit, the voltage drop in every circuit is modelled. The
calculated voltage drop is displayed in volts and in percentage of the rated
voltage. These values are then compared with the specified voltage drop
tolerance at each section of the installation. Those circuits, which exceed
the specified tolerance, are considered to have failed the test and will be
highlighted.
Short-Circuit Protection Test
In the short-circuit protection test, the package compares the breaking
capacity of each breaker in each circuit to the prospective short-circuit
current at the point of installation. A breaker is considered to have failed
Computer-aided Design and Simulation 185
if its breaking capacity is less than the short-circuit current. The package
then models the operating time of each breaker based on the short-circuit
current at the point of installation. A breaker is considered to have failed
if the breaker’s operating time exceeds the critical operating time. The
critical operating time is the maximum allowable time in seconds required to
disconnect the circuit to ensure that the temperature in the conductor will
not exceed its thermal limit during the fault condition. This critical value is
calculated for each circuit based on the fault current, insulation material
and the type and cross-sectional area of the conductors. A typical display
of the short-circuit protection test is shown in Figure 8.13. Circuit 2 fails
since the maximum withstand time of this cable is 3.186 seconds but the
breaker operating time is 6.5 seconds resulting a failure of -104% as shown
in Figure 8.13. Similarly for circuit 5, it fails with -526%. All other circuits
pass from 74.88% for circuit 1 to 99.73% for circuit 6.
Figure 8.13 Short-circuit protection test
Motor Starting Test
For each motor circuit, the package calculates the starting current based
on the connected load and the type of starter. The starting current is
assumed as four times the full load current for 15 seconds for a star-delta
starter, and seven times the full load current for 10 seconds for a direct-
on-line (DOL) starter. Based on the assumed starting currents, the
operating time of each breaker is modelled. If this operating time exceeds
the starting duration, it is considered to have passed the test. Figure 8.14
186 Chapter 8
shows circuits 3 and 4 fail and circuits 1 and 5 pass. For circuit 3, the
starting current is 421 A and the 80-A MCCB operating time is 1 second
which is shorter the stating duration of 10 second for DOL starter.
Similarly, for circuit 4, the 100-A MCCB operating time is 11 seconds which
is shorter than the duration of 15 seconds for AT80% starter.
Figure 8.14 Motor starting test
8.6 INTEGRATED TOOLS FOR TEACHING
An innovative approach of using computer-aided design tools to support the
teaching of electrical installations through hands-on design exercises has
been used at Nanyang Technological University and Singapore Polytechnic
[Ref. 1, Ref. 6]. It is implemented by an integrated package with all the
built-in facilities, which guide the students step-by-step to complete the
design of two electrical installations, namely, a 300-kVA two-storey
building and a 2-MVA seven-storey flatted factory. The dedicated file
structure enables the students to get a direct access to the building
information, details of each type of load and the technical parameters of
all the electrical parts required for the design exercise. Errors made by
the student are prompted on the spot and the student’s performance is
evaluated automatically through error logs and a demerit point system. The
series of simulation tests described in section 8.5 enable the students to
visualise the performance of the installations designed by them under a
series of loading conditions, and to foresee consequences which may be
resulted due to the design errors.
Computer-aided Design and Simulation 187
8.6.1 Automated Marking and Grading
The errors made by the student in the design exercise are stored under 36
separate items classified under 9 types of errors. For example, errors
such as wrong types of cables, wrong installation methods, undersized
cables, oversized cables are classified as type 3 errors (cable
specification), and each error carries 2 demerit points. A second attempt
with hint given is classified as a type 9 error (2nd attempt) and each error
carries 1 demerit point. Errors such as motor tripping during starting or
wrong types of motor starters are classified as type 5 error (motor circuit
specification) which carries 3 demerit points for each error made. There
is, however, a special type 10 variable, which is used to store the bonus
points. For example, if the three phases of a final DB can be balanced at
95% or above, one bonus point is given. An error checking data file,
Points.dat, which has 36 error records is shown in Figure 8.15. Each record
contains the record number, demerit points, error type and the specific
error message.
The evaluation of the student’s performance is based on 9 types of errors
which can be quantified as demerit points. The conversion from the total
demerit points to an appropriate grade is specified in the same error
checking data file, Points.dat, from record 38 to record 42. The instructor
can adjust and fine-tune the parameters in these few records to match the
level of learning of the students. The overall score summary and the 9
types of errors are also shown in Figure 8.16.
8.6.2 Full Test and Partial Test
To accelerate the design and learning process, three categories of designs,
namely full design, partial design and automatic design can be
accommodated in VipTein [Ref 1, Ref 6]. The instructor can specify in the
building data file, in advance, the type of design for each circuit. For a full
design, the student has to complete all the design procedures including the
calculation of the design current, selection of breaker type, breaker rating,
cable rating, calculation of voltage drop and sizing of protective conductor.
If it is a partial design, the design current and the voltage drop will be
calculated by the package and displayed in the side windows to help the
student in selecting the size of the conductor. For circuit under automatic
design, all the design works will be done by the package and displayed. The
last category of the design is aimed at eliminating the routine or repetitive
design works which cannot be avoided in the process of completing the
design of the whole installation.
188 Chapter 8
0 -2 1 wrong circuit breaker type
1 -2 1 underestimated category of duty for circuit breaker
2 -2 1 overestimated category of duty for circuit breaker
3 -2 1 circuit breaker rating under rated
4 -2 1 circuit breaker rating over rated
5 -2 2 wrong design current,Ib, calculation
6 -3 5 wrong starter type
7 -2 3 wrong cable type
8 -2 3 wrong installation method
9 -2 3 undersized cable
10 -2 3 oversized cable
11 -2 2 wrong voltdrop calculation
12 -2 3 voltdrop exceeded specified %
13 -2 2 wrong Izmin calculation
14 -2 6 wrong correction factors
15 -2 6 underestimation of ways for DB
16 -2 6 overestimation of ways for DB
17 -2 6 DF/CF not acceptable
18 -2 6 wrong number of load connected to riser
19 -2 1 under rated RCCB
20 -2 1 over rated RCCB
21 -2 8 unconnected load
22 -2 8 unbalanced load - 15%
23 -3 5 motor trip during starting
24 -1 9 second attempt/hints given
25 -2 4 undersized busbar riser
26 -2 4 oversized busbar riser
27 -2 4 undersized busbar
28 -2 4 oversized busbar
29 -2 7 wrong postion of meters,devices and class of CT,etc
30 -2 7 under rating of generator
31 -2 7 over rating of generator
32 -2 7 wrong cpc selection
33 -2 7 incorrect type of incoming
34 1 10 practical connection of loads to riser
35 1 10 percentage balanced < 5%
36 1 10 reserve
37 0 0 END
38 -1 0 A
39 -4 0 B
40 -12 0 C
41 -19 0 D
42 -28 0 E
43 14 0 FINAL
Figure 8.15 Error checking data file Point.dat
8.6.3 Implementation of VipTein
The specially developed package known as VipTein, is abbreviated from
‘Visually Interactive Package for Teaching of Electrical Installation
Network’. It is implemented in a project course to teach EEE second-year
students in the design of electrical installation [Ref. 5, Ref 6]. The
students are divided into 24 groups of 30 students each using 15
Computer-aided Design and Simulation 189
microcomputers at a time. Although numerous modifications and three
versions of updates have been made, the simulator has been run quite
successfully for three years. Almost all students find it interesting and
challenging.
Figure 8.16 Summary of an assessment report
F10 - NEXT STAGE
Overall Score
Type of Error Number of Error Demerit Point
F1 - HARDCOPY
Breaker Spec.
Calculation
Cable Spec.
Busway/Cable Spec.
Motor Circuit Spec.
Assumptions
Incoming Spec.
Unconnected load
2nd Attempt
1
2
2
0
0
0
1
0
2
-2
-4
-4
0
0
0
-3
0
-2
Number of Bonus : 1
Bonus points : 1
Total demerit points : -14
Overall grade : C
STUDENT NAME : Chang San CLASS/GROUP : S12/B
: Lee Si Date : 19 Oct 1996
SUPERVISOR : A/Prof Teo Cheng Yu Time : 10:23:12
8.7 REFERENCES
[1] Teo C Y, “A New Integrated Tool for Design Exercise of Electrical
Installations Using a Microcomputer”, Journal of Electric Power Systems
Research, vol.36, no. 2, PP 81-91, 1996.
[2] “Regulations of Electrical Installation”, 16th Edition, IEE, 1991.
[3] Teo C Y, “Computer-aided Design and Simulation of Low Voltage Electrical
Distribution Systems”, Journal of Computers in Industry, vol. 34, no. 1, PP
87-94,1997.
[4] Teo C Y, “Computer-aided Design, Assessment and Costing System for
Electrical Installation in Building”, NTI Applied Research Report RP18/83,
1987.
[5] Gooi H B, Teo C Y, “A Project-oriented Power Engineering Curriculum”,
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 10, no.1, 1995.
[6] Teo Cheng Yu, ”Teaching of Power Engineering Through E-Learning with
Laboratory Automated Assessment”, ICEE 2009, International
Conference on Engineering and Education, 2009
190
APPENDIX A
COMMON TECHNICAL TERMS
Arcing Contact
A contact on which the arc is intended to be established.
Break Time
The interval of time between the beginning of the operating time of a
mechanical switching device and the end of the arcing time. This is also
known as total operating time.
Breaking Capacity
A value of prospective breaking current that a switching device is capable
of breaking at a stated voltage under prescribed conditions of use and
behaviour.
Breaking Current
The current in a pole of a switching device at the instant of initiation of
the arc during a breaking process.
Circuit Breaker
A mechanical switching device, capable of making, carrying and breaking
currents under normal circuit conditions. It is also capable of making and
carrying currents for a specified time, and breaking currents under
specified abnormal circuit conditions such as those of short-circuit.
Conventional Non-tripping Current
A specified value of current which the relay or release can carry for a
specified time (conventional time) without operating.
Conventional Tripping Current
A specified value of current which causes the relay or release to operate
within a specified time (conventional time). This time is normally specified
as 1 hour, 2 hours or 4 hours.
Definite Time-delay Over-current Relay or Release
An over-current relay or release which operates with a definite time-delay
which may be adjustable but is independent of the value of the over-
current.
Common Technical Terms 191
Exposed-Conductive-Part
A conductive part which an be readily touched and which normally is not
live, but which may become live under fault conditions.
Impulse withstand Voltage
The highest peak value of an impulse voltage of prescribed form and
polarity which does not cause breakdown under specified conditions of test.
Instantaneous Relay or Release
A relay or release which operates without any intentional time-delay.
Inverse Time-delay Over-current Relay or Release
An over-current relay or release which operates after a time-delay
inversely dependent upon the value of the over-current.
Making Capacity
A value of prospective making current that a switching device is capable of
making at a stated voltage under prescribed conditions of use and
behaviour. For a.c., the rated making capacity is expressed by the r.m.s.
value of the symmetrical component of the current, assumed to be
constant.
Main Contact
A contact included in the main circuit of a mechanical switching device,
intended to carry, in the closed position, the current of the main circuit.
Opening Time
The interval of time between the specified instant of initiation of the
opening operation and the instant when the arcing contacts have separated
in all poles. This is equivalent to pre-arcing time of a fuse.
Over-current Relay or Release
A relay or release which causes a mechanical switching device to open with
or without time-delay when the current in the relay or release exceeds a
pre-determined value.
Power-frequency withstand Voltage
The r.m.s. value of the sinusoidal voltage at power frequency which the
insulation of the circuit-breaker withstands and does not cause breakdown
under specified conditions.
192 Appendix A
Prospective Current
The current that would flow in the circuit, if each pole of the switching
device or the fuse were replaced by a conductor of negligible impedance.
Relay
A device designed to produce sudden, pre-determined changes in one or
more electrical output circuits when certain conditions are fulfilled in the
electrical input circuits controlling the device.
Release
A device, mechanically connected to a mechanical switching device, which
releases the holding means and permits the opening or the closing of the
switching device.
Residual Current
Vector sum of the instantaneous values of the current flowing in the main
circuit of the RCCB (expressed as r.m.s. value).
Short-circuit (making and breaking) Capacity
The alternating component of the prospective current, expressed by its
r.m.s. value which the circuit-breaker is designed to make, carry for its
opening time and to break under specified conditions.
Short-time withstand Current
The current that a circuit breaker can carry in the closed position during a
specified short time under prescribed conditions of use and behaviour.
Shunt Release
A release energised by a source of voltage.
Trip-free Mechanical Switching Device
A mechanical switching device, the moving contacts of which return to and
remain in the open position when the opening (i.e. tripping) operation is
initiated after the initiation of the closing operation, even if the closing
command is maintained.
APPENDIX B
FORMULAE FOR
DESIGN CALCULATIONS
B.1 Design current (A) for a 3-phase load
I =
kW
3 x 400 x p.f.
x 1000 or I =
kW kVAr
3 x 400
x 1000b b
2 2
+
p.f. = cos tan
kVAr
kW
-1⎛
⎝
⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟
B.2 Design current (A) for a 1-phase load
I
W
230 p.f.
b =
×
B.3 Design current (A) for a motor
I =
kW
3 x 400 x p.f. x E
x 10b
ff
3
B.4 Design current (A) for discharge lighting
I
Wattage of Lamp 1.8
230b =
×
B.5 Minimum CPC size (mm2
)
S =
I t
kmin
EF
2
×
subject to Smin > 2.5 mm2
B.6 Minimum It value (A)
Overload protection required : I =
I
C x C x Ct, min
N
g a i
Overload protection not required : I =
I
C x C x Ct, min
B
g a i
193
194 Appendix B
B.7 Stand-by generator capacity (kVA)
Recommended generator capacity = 1.2 x design load
B.8 Motor starting
If manufacturer’s data is not available, the following starting conditions
are recommended:
DOL starter : Istarting = 7 x IFL for 10 s
Other starter: Istarting = 4 x IFL for 15 s
B.9 Demand and the coincidence factors
Emergency load : DF = 1 CF = 1
Other Load : DF = 0.8 to 0.95 CF = 0.75 to 0.95
B.10 Voltage drop (V)
V
r cos + x sin
1000
I x lengthdrop B= ×
( )θ θ
B.11 Three-phase short-circuit current (A per phase)
( ) ( )
I
V
R R X X
F
L L
S S
,3
1
2
1
2
3
φ =
+ + +
−
B.12 Line-to-neutral short-circuit current (A)
( ) ( )
I
V
R R R X X X
F LN
L L
S n S
, =
+ + + + +
− 3
1
2
1
2
n
B.13 Socket outlet circuit
MCB current rating : use a minimum of 16 A to a maximum of 32 A
Cable size : use a minimum of 2.5 mm2
to a maximum of 4 mm2
B.14 Line-to-Earth Short-circuit Current (A)
I
V
ZF LE
L L
EFL
, = − 3
APPENDIX C
TOUCH VOLTAGE AND
FAULT CURRENT DISTRIBUTION
C.1 Three-Phase Representation of a TN-S System
In the sample TN-S system as shown in Figure C.1, the utility 22 kV
network connected to DU is represented by an equivalent generator with
Z1=Z2=Z0. Based on a fault level of 800 MVA with a X/R ratio of 10, the
value of Z1 is 0.01244+j0.1244 p.u. on a 100 MVA, 22 kV base. The 6.5 Ω
earthing resistor at the 22 kV incoming source is modeled as a resistor
connected from the neutral of the equivalent generator to earth.
60 kW
at 0.8 p.f.
M
50 m
1X50mm2
Cu/pvc
3X25mm2
Cu/pvc
1X10mm2
Cu/pvc
50 m
3X95mm2
Cu/pvc
20 m
400 V22kV
D2 D3D1DU
Figure C.1 A sample TN-S system
6.5Ω
1.6 MVA
20 m
The 1.6 MVA delta-earthed-wye transformer has a leakage reactance of
6% on a 1.6 MVA base i.e. 3.75 p.u. on a 100 MVA base. The 50-m circuit
from D1 to D2 consists of three single-core, pvc-insulated copper
conductor cables of 95 mm2
with a PC of 50 mm2
. The 20-m circuit from
D2 to D3 is fed by similar cables of 25 mm2
with a PC of 10 mm2
. Based on
the layout of circuit conductors as shown in Figure C.2, the self reactance
of each single-core cable and their mutual reactances are calculated. The
60-kW motor is modeled as an un-earthed generator with a sub-transient
reactance of 25% on 75 KVA base with X1=X2=X0. The value of X1 is 333.33
p.u. on a 100 MVA, 400 V base.
The post-fault voltages including touch voltages and the current
distribution for an earth fault from phase A to the frame of the motor is
shown in Figure C.3.
195
196 Appendix C
21.2mm21.2mm21.2mm
7.98mm
11mm
5.1 mm5.1 mm
Figure C.2 The layout of circuit conductors from D1 to D2
A B C N*
PC
* In a 3-phase 3-wire system, the neutral conductor is removed, but the space is kept
D3
To illustrate the existence of non-zero touch voltages, it is assumed that
the earth fault current has blown the fuse at phase A of the circuit from
D2 to D3. This phenomena can be modeled by inserting a node 18 as shown
in Figure C.4 in which the calculated post-fault voltages and current
distribution are also shown.
C.2 Three-Phase Representation of a TT System
In the TT system as shown in Figure C.5, the utility 22 kV network
connected to EU and the 22 kV/400 V transformer are represented by one
equivalent generator connected to E1 with Z1 = Z2 = Z0 as shown in
Figure C.6. Based on a fault level of 25 MVA with a X/R ratio of 5 at E1
Figure C.3 The post fault voltages and current distribution for the TN-S
24.1∠-480
155∠-380
29∠1690
95∠-1070
43∠-1190
54∠-970
241∠-1500
231∠-1500
24.1∠-480
233∠900
54∠-970
54∠-970 54∠-970 54∠-970
43∠-119043∠-1190
43∠-1190
43∠-1190
43∠-1190
2335∠-490
2335∠-490 2335∠-490
2335∠-490
12.7 K∠1200
12.7 K∠-1200
0.22∠1330
24.4∠-48°
24 ∠-480 0.22∠1330
.4
4
2
12.7 K∠0°
1
17
13
14
15
231∠900
7
227∠-330
5
6
196∠-370
2335∠-490
232∠900
11
D2D1
DU
9
239∠-1500
100.45∠-1190
0.57∠-970
24.5∠-490
2388∠-510
2388∠-510
2388∠-510
0∠00 56∠-250 155∠-380
2388∠-510 2388∠-510
168 12
3
0∠00
∠00
0
Touch Voltage and Fault Current Distribution 197
D3D2D1
the value of Z1 is 0.7845+j3.9225 p.u. on a 100 MVA, 400V base. The 50-m
circuit from E1 to E2 consisting of four identical single-core, pvc-insulated
copper conductor cables of 95 mm2
without PC, and the other 50-m circuit
from E2 to E3 has an additional PC of 25 mm2
. The layout of the circuit
conductors is the same as those shown in Figure C.2. It is assumed that the
unbalanced load can be lumped at E3 as LA=200 A, LB=250 A and LC= 300 A
with a power factor of 0.8. It is also assumed that the earth electrode
resistance at the installation is 0.9 Ω and that at the equivalent generator
at E1 is 0.1 Ω. The prefault voltages and current distribution is shown in
Figure C.6.
4X95mm2
Cu/pvc
1X25mm2 Cu/pvc
50 m
50 m
4X95mm2
Cu/pvc
50 m
400 V400 V400 V22kV
E2 E3E1
0.9
Ω
0.1Ω
LA=200A
LB=250AB
LC=300A
EU
Figure C.5 A sample TT System
Figure C.4 Fault current distribution after the operation of one fuse at node 18
1.5∠-1150
18∠-1020
18∠-1030
78∠1520
139∠-1150
140∠-1150
230∠-1510
1.5∠-1150
236∠900
140∠-1150
140∠-1150
140∠-1150 140∠-1150
139∠-1150
139∠-1150
139∠-1150
0∠00
0∠0
12.7 K∠1200
12.7 K∠-1200
0∠00
1.5∠-1150
1.5∠-1150
0∠00
0∠00
230∠-300
DU 231∠-300
4
2
3
12.7 K∠00
1
17
13
14
15
231∠900
7
233∠900
11
1.5∠-1150
1.5∠-1150
0∠00
279∠-1150
279∠-1150
279∠-1150
6.4∠-920 18∠-1030
279∠-1150
16
0∠00
279∠-1150
8 12
231∠-1500
139∠-1150139∠-1150
0∠00 0∠00
5 9
231∠-1510
106
18
0∠00
198 Appendix C
79.5∠1150
288∠830
195∠-370
243∠-1570
4
195∠-370
195∠-370195∠-370
227∠-0.030
5
225∠0.20
9
E2 E3E1
Y
B
R
243∠-1570
2
230∠-0.20
1
230∠1200
3
243∠-1570243∠-1570
227∠-1200
6
288∠830
243∠-1570
195∠-370224∠-1200
10
LC
LB
LA
79.5∠1150
288∠830288∠830 288∠830
223∠1200
11
226∠1200
7
79.5∠1150
79.5∠1150
12
1.4∠1000
0.7∠1000
8 0∠00
0∠00
0∠00
13
0.23∠-60
0∠00
14
0∠00
0.9Ω
Figure C.6 . The pre-fault voltages and current disribution for the TT
t
230∠-1200
0∠00
0∠00
For an earth fault from phase A to the exposed conductive part at E3 as
shown in Figure C.7, the earth fault current is actually less than the load
currents in the other two healthy phases. The shock voltages are also
higher than those in the TN-S system. The fault current distribution and
the post-fault voltages including shock voltages and neutral voltages are
also shown in Figure C.7.
C.3 Single Phase Representation
Without using computer programs, the calculation of earth-fault currents
can be approximated by using a single phase equivalent. The values of cable
impedance can also be approximated by using the voltage drop constant
given in the IEE cable tables.
Touch Voltage and Fault Current Distribution 199
80∠1220
287∠830
386∠-190
245∠-1560
4
386∠-190 386∠-190
386∠-190
203∠-20
5
198∠-20
9
E2 E3E1
Y
B
R
245∠1560
2
208∠-0.30
1
242∠1240
3
245∠-1560245∠-1560
242∠-1240
6
287∠830
245∠-1560
190∠-380239∠-1240
10
LC
LB
LA
80∠1220
287∠830
287∠830 287∠830
232∠1250
11
235∠1250
7
80∠1220
80∠1220
12
22∠-1760
22∠-1730
8 215∠-30
215∠-30
215∠-30
0.9Ω
215∠-30
13
198∠-20
193∠-30
14
240∠-1250
215∠-30
21∠1770
Figure C.7 The post fault voltages and current distribution for the TT system
For the same sample TN-S system as shown in Figure 1, the combined
impedance of the utility and the transformer can be transferred from 22
kV to 400 V. This impedance is :
ZS = ZG+ZTF
=0.0016Ωx(0.01244+j0.1244)+0.0016Ωx(j3.75)
= 0.00002+j0.0002+j0.006 (Ω )
= 0.00002+j0.0062 (Ω)
From IEE cable Table 4D1B, column 8
Z95=(0.00041+j0.00023)x50/ 3=0.01184+j0.00664 (Ω)
Z25=(0.0015+j0.00025)x20/ 3=0.01732+j0.00289 (Ω)
Z10=(0.0038+j0.0)x20/ 3=0.04388 (Ω)
200 Appendix C
Z50 = (0.00080 + j0.00024) x 50/ 3 = 0.02309+j0.00693 (Ω)
By using IEE cable table, the earth fault current is
I
400 / 3
Z Z Z Z Z
F,LE,T
S 95 25 10 5
=
+ + + + 0
=
230.9
0.09615 j0.02266+
= 2337∠-13° (A)
Alternatively the cable impedance can be obtained by calculating the self
and mutual reactances based on the layout of circuit conductors as shown in
Figure C.2.
Based on the self reactance only, the impedance of each conductor is:
ZC=RC+jXC
= ρ π
L
A
j2 fk(ln
2L
Ds
-1) x L+
where ρ=2.25x10-8
Ω.m at 70°C , K=2x10-7
H/m, DS= 0.7788 multiplied by
the radius of the cylindrical conductor, and f=50 Hz.
ZC95= 225 10
50
95 10
06283 10
2 50
07788 55 10
1 508
6
4
3
. . (ln
. .
)x x
x
j x x
x
x x
x−
−
−
−
+ −
= 0.01184+j0.02845 (Ω)
ZC25=0.01732+j0.01106 (Ω)
ZC10=0.04388+j0.01164 (Ω)
ZC50=0.02309+j0.02944 (Ω)
The mutual reactance between phase A conductor and the PC is :
ZM = j fk
L
Dm
xL2
2
1π (ln )−
Touch Voltage and Fault Current Distribution 201
where the value of Dm is the distance between the centres of the phase A
conductor and the PC.
ZM50,95 = ZM95,50= j x x
x
x
x06283 10
2 50
833 10
1 504
3
. (ln
.
)−
−
−
= j0.01912 (Ω)
ZM25,10= ZM10,25 = j0.00693 (Ω)
By using the self and mutual reactances, the fault current is
I
400 / 3
Z Z Z Z + Z - 2Z 2ZF,LE,M
S S95 S25 S10 S50 M95,50 - M25,10
=
+ + +
=
+
2309
0 09615 0 03470
.
. .j
= 2259∠-20° (A)
The earth fault current calculated by using the 3-phase representation as
shown in Figure C.3 is 2388 ∠-51°.
APPENDIX D
PER UNIT CALCULATION
D.1 Calculation of Per Unit Impedance
Case 1:
For base MVA = 100 MVA and base voltage = 400 V,
Per Unit Impedance =
( )base voltage
base MVA
2
=
400 x 400
100 x 106 = 0.0016 Ω
Case 2:
For base MVA = 1 MVA and base Voltage = 400 V,
Per Unit Impedance =
400 x 400
1 x 106 = 0.16 Ω
Case 3:
For base MVA = 100 MVA and base Voltage = 22 kV,
Per Unit Impedance =
( )22 x 22 x 10
100 x 10
6
6 = 4.84 Ω
D.2 Conversion from Fault Level to Per Unit Impedance
Example D.2.1
Calculate the equivalent impedance for a fault level of 25 MVA at 400 V
with a X/R ratio of 5.
Solution
Select base MVA = 1 MVA and base voltage = 400 V.
The equivalent per unit impedance (ΖS, p.u. ) of the 25 MVA fault level is :
202
Per unit calculation 203
ΖS, p.u. =
1
25
= 0.04p.u.
since Ζ = R X2
+ 2
and X/R = 5 ,
0.04 = R Rs
2
s
2
+ 25 = R 26s
RS,pu =
0.04
26
= 0.0078 p.u.
RS = 0.16Ω x 0.0078 = 0.001248 Ω at 400 V
XS,pu = 0.0078 x 5 = 0.039 p.u.
XS = 0.16 Ω x 0.039 = 0.00624 Ω at 400 V
Example D.2.2
Calculate the equivalent impedance of a fault level of 800 MVA at 22 kV
with a X/R of 10.
Solution
Select base MVA = 100 MVA and base voltage = 22 kV. As the per unit
voltage is 1.0 and the fault current resulted from the fault level of 800
MVA is 800 MVA / 100 MVA = 8 per unit current, the equivalent per unit
impedance of the 800 MVA fault level is
ZS, p.u. =
1
8
= 0.125 p.u.
since Z = R X2 2
+ and X/R = 10 ,
0.125 = R + 100Rs
2
s
2
= R 101s
RS,pu =
0.125
101
= 0.0124 p.u.
204 Appendix D
RS = 4.84 Ω x 0.0124 = 0.06 Ω at 22 kV
XS,pu = 10 x 0.0124 = 0.124 p.u.
XS = 4.84 Ω x 0.124 = 0.6 Ω at 22 kV
Example D.2.3
Calculate the equivalent impedance of the fault level of 35 kA at 400 V
with a X/R ratio of 5.
Solution
Since the three-phase short-circuit current IF is
IF = (400 / 3 ) / ZS
The equivalent per phase impedance ZS resulted by the 35 kA fault current
is:
ZS = (400 / 3 ) / (35,000) = 0.006598 Ω
RS = 0.006598 / 26 = 0.001294 Ω
XS = 5 RS =0.00647 Ω
If the base MVA is 1 MVA and the base voltage is 400 V, the per unit
values are :
RS,pu = 0.001294 Ω / 0.16 Ω = 0.00808 per unit
XS, pu = 0.00647 Ω / 0.16 Ω = 0.04044 per unit
APPENDIX E
TUTORIAL FOR
IEE SHORT COURSE
E1
Determine the type of protective device, current rating and the required
breaking capacity for a circuit to a 3-phase motor that is rated at 25 kW,
95% efficiency and 0.85 power factor. This motor has a DOL starter. The
main switchboard is fed by a 1-MVA, 22-kV/LV transformer that has a
leakage impedance of 6% as shown in Figure E.1. The fault level at 22 kV is
800 MVA and the ambient temperature is 40°C. If the motor circuit is a 4
x 25 mm2, single-core copper conductor pvc-insulated cable installed in
trunking at a length of 15 m, determine whether this circuit is adequately
protected against both overload and short-circuit currents when a fault
occurs at the motor terminal.
22 kV LV
Main switchboard
800 MVA
1 MVA
6 %
95% Eff.
0.85 p.f.
25 kW
? DOL M
4 x 25 mm2
Cu/PVC, 15 m
IF1
IF2
Figure E.1
E2
The design current of DB1 is 39 A and it is fed by a 4 x 10 mm2 single-
core, copper conductor, pvc-insulated cables and protected by a 40 A MCCB
as shown in Figure 4.2.
(a) Does this circuit satisfy the requirements for overload protection?
(b) State the range of small overload that this circuit is not protected.
(c) If this circuit is upgraded to a 4 x 25 mm2 cable, can this circuit be
loaded up to 100% of its rated capacity?
205
206 Appendix E
40A
MCCB
4 x 10 mm2
/1C/Cu/PVC/NA, trunking
IB = 39A
DB1
Figure E.2
E3
The low-voltage supply to a high-rise block is shown in Figure E.3. A short
circuit occurs inside a final distribution board at the top floor. The fault
current is 500 A.
Figure E.3
63A
500A
MCCB
200A
Main
Switchboard
BS 88 fuse
200A
OG Box
A final DB at top floor
(a) What is the operating time of the incoming protective device at the
final DB if it is a BS EN 60898, 63-A type C MCB, or an IEC 1008, 63-
A RCCB with a rated residual operating current of 0.1 A?
(b) Determine the operating time of the MCCB rated at 200 A at the main
switchboard.
Tutorial for IEE Short Course 207
(c) Determine the operating time of the BS 88 fuse rated at 200 A at the
OG Box.
E4
As shown in Figure E.4, the 4 x 10 mm2 copper conductor, pvc-insulated
cable which has a ‘k’ value of 115 is protected by a BS EN 60898 100-A
type C MCB.
(a) Determine the ranges of short-circuit current in which this circuit is
not protected. Suggest an appropriate correction so that the unprotected
range can be reduced or totally eliminated.
(b) The breaking capacity of the 100-A MCB is 10 kA but the expected
fault current is 14 kA. Determine the current rating of a BS 88 fuse that
can be used to back-up the MCB. Will the operating time of the fuse be
greater than the operating time of the MCB?
Type C
100 A
MCB
4 x 10 mm2 Cu/PVC
IF=14 kA
Figure E.4
E5
A 4 x 10 mm2 circuit, clipped directly on a non-metallic surface as shown in
Figure E.5 is protected by a 60-A MCCB which has a maximum operating
time of 0.1 s. The short-circuit current is 5000 A.
(a) Explain why this circuit is not adequately protected against short
circuit and recommend the necessary remedial solution.
(b) Determine the maximum short-circuit current that this circuit can
withstand.
60A
MCCB
4 x 10 mm2
/1C/Cu/PVC/NA, clipped direct
IF = 5000A
Figure E.5
208 Appendix E
E6
For protection against indirect contact for electric shock in an installation
which is part of a TN system, determine the maximum earth fault loop
impedance for a final circuit supply only stationary equipment if it is solely
protected by:
(a) A BS EN 60898, 63-A type C MCB,
(b) A BS EN 60898, 63-A type B MCB, or
(c) An IEC 1008, 63-A RCCB with a rated residual operating current of 0.03
A.
E7
An installation that is part of a TT system has a final circuit with a length
of 20 m for socket outlets. The circuit is a single-core, pvc-insulated
copper conductor cable of 4 mm2 with a separate CPC of the same size as
shown in Figure E.6. The CPC from the final DB to the main earthing
terminal is 16 mm2 at 30 m and the earthing conductor is 25 mm2 at 10 m.
All the CPC are single-core pvc-insulated copper conductors and the earth
electrode resistance is 0.3 Ω. Assume that the ambient temperature is 300
C and the average CPC temperature during fault condition is 950
C. Does
this final circuit satisfy the protection requirement for electric shock if
the protective device is?
(a) BS 3871, 20-A type 1 MCB,
(b) A BS EN 60898, 20-A type C MCB, or
(c) An IEC 1008, 20-A RCCB with a rated residual operating current of 0.03
A.
E8
A 230-V supply to an electric heater utilizes a circuit of pvc-insulated,
copper conductor cable of 6 mm2, with a separate bare copper conductor
CPC size of 4 mm2 at a length of 18 m as shown in Figure E.7. The external
earth fault loop impedance has a resistance value of 0.12 Ω and a reactance
value of 0.8 Ω. Determine whether the size of the 4 mm2 CPC can satisfy
the electric shock protection as well as the thermal constraint if the
circuit is protected by a BS EN 60898, 40-A type B MCB.
If this circuit is protected by an IEC 1008, 40-A RCCB with a rated
Tutorial for IEE Short Course 209
residual current of 0.03 A, determine the maximum allowable disconnection
time based on the thermal limit of the 4 mm2 CPC.
To
Socket
outlets
1x16mm2
Cu/PVC 1x25mm2
Cu/PVC, clipped direct
trunking, 20m
1x4mm2
Cu/PVC2x4mm2
Cu/PVC,
63A
clipped direct, 30m 10m
CPC
Earthing conductor
Earth
Electrode
0.3Ω
Final DB
Earthing
Terminal
RCCB
20 A
Figure E.6
40A clipped direct, 18m
Heater
MCB
RE = 0.12 Ω
XE = 0.8 Ω
2x6mm2
1C/Cu/PVC, 1x4mm2
bare copper conductor(CPC)
Figure E.7
E9
The electrical supply to a factory is fed by a 1.6-MVA, 22/0.4-kV
transformer that has a reactance of 6 % as shown in Figure E.8. The
resistance of the transformer is negligible. All the MCCBs have the same
time-current characteristic as given in Table E.1. The current ratings and
the values of resistance and reactance of each circuit are given in Table
E.2. Determine the magnitude of the earth-fault current for an earth fault
at the motor terminal and confirm whether the motor circuit has adequate
protection against electric shock? Give reasons with calculation.
210 Appendix E
××
400 V
MCCB
22 kV
4 x 95 mm2
MCCB
4 x 25 mm2
1.6 MVA
200 A
6 %
M
1 x 50 mm2
Final DB
0.9 Ω
1 x 10 mm2
25 kW
1 x 300 mm2
1 x 300 mm2
Figure E.8
100 A
Table E.1 Time-current Characteristic of MCCBs
Multiple of rated current Operating time (seconds)
> 10 0.03
5 0.1
4 5
3.3 12
2 100
1.3 7200
Table E.2 Cable Characteristic
Cable Size Current rating Resistance* Reactance*
4 x 95 mm2 207 A 0.007 Ω 0.004 Ω
4 x 25 mm2 89 A 0.008 Ω 0.002 Ω
1 x 50 mm2 - 0.014 6Ω 0.003 Ω
1 x 10 mm2 - 0.022 Ω 0.0 Ω
1 x 300 mm2 - 0.0 Ω 0.0 Ω
* Per-phase value for the whole circuit length and no temperature
correction is required.
APPENDIX F
SOLUTION
TO TUTORIAL E
F.1 Solution to E1
IB = (25 x 10 ) / (0.95 x 0.85 xB
3
3 x 400) = 44.69 A
IS = 7 x 44.69 = 313 A
Select a base of 1.0 MVA and 0.4 kV. The equivalent source impedance of a
fault level of 800MVA is 0.00125 p. u. The three-phase short-circuit
current at the main switchboard is:
kA23.56=kA1.44316.33=I
p.u.33.16
06125.0
1
00125.006.0
1
I
F,3
3,F
×
==
+
=
φ
φ
The type of protective device should be a MCCB with a breaking capacity of
more than 23.56 kA. The current rating of the MCCB should be higher than
the design current of 44.69 A and it must not operate within 10 s at a
starting current of 313 A. From the time-current characteristic of MCCB
at 400 C and for the operating time of 10 s, the corresponding current
multiplier is 2.2. Thus, the current rating of the MCCB should be higher
than 313/2.2 =142 A. A current rating of 200 A is selected.
From Table 4D1A, the tabulated current rating (It) of the 25 mm2 circuit
is 89 A.
IZ = 89 x 0.87 = 77 A, I2 = 1.30 x 200 = 260 A,
1.45 IZ = 1.45 x 89 x 0.87 = 112 A
Since IN is not < IZ, and I2 is not < 1.45 IZ, this circuit does not satisfy the
requirement for overload protection.
The per unit resistance and reactance of the 25 mm2 cable from Table
4D1B are:
unitper0157.0
10000.163
150.29
=x
unitper0812.0
100016.03
155.1
r
=
××
×
=
××
×
=
211
212 Appendix F
The three-phase short circuit current at the motor terminal is
( )
kA9.12unitper94.8
0812.00157.006.000125.0
1
I
22
3,F ==
+++
=φ
The maximum duration for the 25mm2
cable to withstand a fault current of
12.9 kA is
( )
s0496.0
12900
25115
I
Sk
t 2
22
2
F
22
max,cable =
×
==
Since the operating time of the MCCB at a current of 12.9 kA is 0.1 s which
is greater than the critical time of 0.0496 s, this circuit is not adequately
protected against short-circuit current.
F.2 Solution to E2
(a) This circuit satisfies the requirements for overload protection based on
IEE Regulation 433:
(i) since IZ = 50 A and IN = 40 A, it satisfies IN < IZ
(ii) since I2 =1.3 x 40 =52 A and 1.45IZ = 72.5 A, it satisfies I2 < 1.45 IZ
(b) The unprotected range is from 50.1 A to 51.9 A.
(c) The maximum circuit loading is: I2 / IZ = 52 / 89 = 58%
F.3 Solution to E3
(a) The operating time for a BS EN 60898 63-A type C MCB is 6.5 s. (from
Figure 2.9). If it is a line-to-neutral fault, the RCCB will not operate. If it
is a line-to-earth fault, the operating time is 0.04 s since the residual
current is 500/0.1 = 5000I∇N.
(b) The operating time of the 200 A MCCB varies from 9 s to 150 s
depending on the ambient temperature and the setting of the MCCB. (from
Figure 2.13).
(c) The operating time of the BS 88 fuse rated at 200 A is 300 s (from
Figure 5.7).
F.4 Solution to E.4
(a) If the maximum operating time of the MCB is 0.01 s and from the
Solution to Tutorial E 213
adiabatic equation, tcable, max = k2S2/I2, the corresponding maximum
current that the cable can withstand is:
0.01
I
, or I
0.01
11.5 kA
2
= = =
Thus, the cable will not be protected if the fault current is higher than
11.5 kA. If the fault current is in the range from 514 A to 1000 A, the
operating time of the MCB is greater than tcable, max and thus, this
circuit is also not protected. The unprotected range from 514 A to 1000 A
can be eliminated by (i) replacing the 100 A type C MCB by type B or (ii)
replacing the 100 A type C MCB by a 50 A type C MCB. The unprotected
range from 11.5 kA onwards c
115 10 115 10
2 2
× ×
an be eliminated by using a backup BS 88 fuse
than the
MCB, the fuse should be operated first.
F.5 Solution to E5
(Illustrated in Figure 5.13)
(b) The current rating of a backup fuse is normally double the rating of the
MCB (i.e. 200 A if the MCB is 100 A). However, it must be verified with the
time current characteristic curves of the MCB and the fuse. For the fault
current below the breaking capacity of the MCB, the MCB should operate
irst, and for fault current at approximately equal or higherf
breaking capacity of the
(a) t
I 5000
0.0529 scable, max 2 2
= = =
Since the operating time of the MCCB at a current of 5,000 A is 0.1 s,
which is greater than tcable, max, this circuit is not adequately protected
against short-circui
k S 115 10
2 2 2 2
×
t current. The remedial action is to increase the
conductor’s size to:
2max
min mm75.13
115
1.05000
k
tI ×
(b) The maximum short circuit that this circuit can withstand is:
S ===
A3637
0.1
10115
t
kS
=I maxF, =
×
=
F.6 Solution to E6
For final circuit connecting to stationary equipment, the disconnection time
is 5 s.
214 Appendix F
(a) The current causing the 63-A type C MCB to operate within 5 s is 630
A. Thus,
Ω== 365.0
630
C,MCB,A63max,,EFL
(b) The c
230
Z
urrent causing the 63-A type B MCB to operate within 5 s is 315
A. Thus,
Ω== 73.0
315
(c) If protection is
230
Z B,MCB,A63max,,EFL
provided by a RCCB, the maximum earth fault loop
impedance is:
Ω==
Δ
= 1666
03.0
50
nI
50
Z 03.0,RCCBmax,,EFL
F.7 Solution to E7
For a TT system, the condition that limits the touch voltage to not more
than 50 V is: RLIA < 50 V, where IA is the current causing the automatic
operation of the protection device within 5 s. From Table 4D1B of the IEE
Regulation:Wiring
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
A4.105
0.4742
50
=I
0.47420.3+0.0095+0.0455+0.1192=
R+R+R+R=R
0095.0
7023010002
95+230101.75
=R
0455.0
70+23010002
95+230302.8
=R
1192.0
7023010002
952302011
R
A
eCPC25,CPC16,CPC4,L
CPC25,
CPC16,
CPC,4
=
Ω=
Ω=
+×
×
Ω=
×
×
Ω=
+×
+×
=
ithin 5 s and thus, it satisfies the requirement for earth fault
e is 11 s, which
l current
s and obviously, it satisfies the requirement.
(a) For a BS 3871 20-A type 1 MCB, the operating time for a current of
105.4 A is w
protection.
(b) For a BS EN 60898 20-A type C MCB, the operating tim
exceeds 5 s, and thus, it does not satisfy the requirement.
(c) For an IEC 1008 20-A RCCB, the operating time for a residua
of 105.4 A is 0.04
Solution to Tutorial E 215
Solution to E.8
Assume that the average phase conductor temperature during the fault is
(70+160)/2 = 1150C and the CPC is (30 C + 200) / 2 = 115 C.0 0
From Table
4D1B of the IEE Wiring Regulations, the resistance values are:
Ω=×⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝ + 702302
4
⎛ +
×=
Ω=×⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛
+
+
×=
1139.0
1000
1811523011
R
0756.0
1000
18
70230
115230
2
3.7
R6
The earth fault loop impedance is:
( )
( ) Ω=++
+++=
858.08.012.09
XRRRZ
22
2
E
2
E46EFL
The line-to-earth fault current is:
+= 113.00756.0
A268
858.0
I LE,F ==
For a current of 268 A, the operating time of the 40-A type B MCB is 0.1 s
which is less than the required time of 5 s and
230
thus, it satisfies the
straint, the minimum cross-sectional area of the
cpc for type B MCB is:
requirement for protection against electric shock.
To satisfy the thermal con
2
22
Btypemin, mm533.0
159
1.0268
k
t ×
imum disconnection time based on the
thermal limit of the 4 mm2 CPC is:
I
S ===
Thus, the CPC size of 4 mm2, which is greater than 0.533 mm2
, satisfies
the thermal constraints. The max
s63.5
268
4159
I
sk
t 2
22
2
LE,F
22
max =
×
==
F.9 Solution to E9
Select a base of 1.6 MVA and 0.4 kV. The line-to-earth short-circuit
current at the motor terminal is:
30050102595TF
motorEF,
Z+Z+Z+Z+Z+Z
=I
230
216 Appendix F
The transf
ZTF,Ω = ZTF,p.u. X 0.1 Ω = 0.06 X 0.1 Ω = 0.006 Ω
ormer impedance ZTF expressed in ohms is,
A4323=
0.0532
=
0.051+0.015
=
22
As the motor is stationary equipment, the disconnection time for earth
fault is 5 s. The operating time
230230
0.014)+0.022+0.008+(0.0070.003)+0.002+0.004+(0.006
230
=I
22
motorEF,
+
of the 100 A MCCB at the earth fault
urrent of 4323 A is 0.03 s and thus, it satisfies the requirement for
rotection against electric shock.
c
p
217
APPENDIX G
MODEL EXAMINATION
QUESTIONS WITH SOLUTION
G1
The electrical supply to a factory is fed by a utility through an ACB rated
at 1600 A as shown in Figure G.1. The fault level at the 400-V intake
substation is 25 MVA (36 kA) with a X/R ratio of 5. The maximum demand
at the MCC is 260 kW and the power factor is 0.8. All the installed circuits
are pvc-insulated, copper conductor cables clipped direct in trefoil on the
wall. The rated current and voltage drop data for each cable are given in
Table G.1.
Correction factors for temperature, grouping and thermal insulation are not
required. The calculated earth fault current at the MCC is 400 A and that
at the 40-kW motor terminal is 250 A. All the MCCBs have the same time-
current characteristic as given in Table G.2.
(a) State the conditions necessary for protection against overload
current. Does the circuit from the intake substation to the MCC satisfy
the requirements for overload protection? Support your answer by
numerical calculation. Determine the range of small overload for which this
circuit is not protected.
(12 marks)
(b) Verify by calculation whether the 500-A MCCB provides adequate
protection for the circuit from the intake substation to the MCC when a 3-
phase short-circuit occurs at the MCC.
(8 marks)
(c) Calculate the touch voltage at the 40 kW motor frame if the red-
phase cable is shorted to the motor frame. The combined resistance of
the earthing conductor and the earth electrode is 0.3 Ω and the earthing
system is a TT system.
(5 marks)
Table G.1 Current Rating and Voltage Drop for 3-phase 4 cables
Cable Size Rated Current Voltage Drop (mV per ampere per metre)
(mm2) (A) R X
25 110 1.50 0.175
50 167 0.80 0.165
120 308 0.32 0.150
300 561 0.13 0.140
218 Appendix G
M
40 kW
MCC (400 V)Intake (400 V)
MCCB
100 A
MCCB
500 A
4 x 50 mm2, 20 m4 x 300 mm2, 40 m
1 x 25 mm2, 20 m, CPC
1 x 120 mm2, 40 m, CPC
Earthing
conductor
Earth electrode
ACB
1600 A
×
Figure G.1
Table G.2 Time-current Characteristic of MCCBs
Multiple of Rated Current Operating Time (Seconds)
> 10 0.03
5 0.10
3.3 12.0
2 100
1.3 3600
1.0 ∞
Solution to G1
(a) Required conditions for protection against overload:
(i) IN ≤ IZ (ii) I2 ≤ 1.45 IZ
For the circuit from intake substation to MCC,
IN =500 A, IZ = 561 A, I2 = 1.3 x 500 A =650 A,
1.45 IZ = 1.45 x 561 A =814 A
Thus, conditions (i) and (ii) are satisfied and this circuit is adequately
protected against overload current accordingly to IEE Regulation 433. The
range of small overload that this circuit is not protected is from 561.1 A to
649.9 A.
(b) Select base MVA = 1 MVA and base voltage = 400 V. The equivalent per
unit impedance of the 25 MVA fault level is:
Model Examination Questions with Solution 219
ZS,pu = 1 / 25 = 0.04 p.u
RS,pu = 0.04 / 26 = 0.0078 p.u. (from X/R = 5)
RS = 0.16 Ω x 0.0078 = 0.001248 Ω at 400 V
XS,pu = 0.0078 x 5 = 0.039 p.u.
XS = 0.16 Ω x 0.039 = 0.00624 Ω at 400 V
Z300mm = 40x (0.13 + j0.14) / ( 3 x 1000) = 0.003 + j 0.00323 Ω
The 3-phase fault current at the MCC is
IF,3-phase = VLN / (ZS + Z300mm )
=(400 / 3 )/ (0.004248 + j0.00947) = 22.250 kA ∠ -65.8
tcable,max = k2
S2
/ IF
2
= (1152
x 3002
) / 222502
= 2.4 s
Since tMCCB is less than tcable max, this circuit provides adequate protection
against short- circuit currents.
(c) The tough voltage at the motor frame is:
250 A x ( Z25mm + Z120mm + 0.3)
= 250 x ( 0.3247 + j 0.005484)
= 81.19 V
G2
The electrical supply to a high-rise apartment is fed by a 1 MVA, 22/0.4 kV
transformer. The schematic diagram of part of the electrical installation is
shown in Figure G.2. All the installed circuits are pvc-insulated copper
conductor cables clipped direct in trefoil on the wall. Voltage-drop data
for each cable is given in Table G.3. Temperature correction for cable
resistive value is not required.
(a) Calculate the short-circuit current for a line-earth fault developed at
the socket outlet. (10 marks)
(b) Calculate the touch voltage for an earth fault at the appliance
connected to the socket outlet within the earthed equipotential zone.
(5 marks)
(c) State the two necessary conditions which will provide adequate
protection against electric shock and determine whether the 60 A RCCB
can be replaced by an MCCB. (10 marks)
220 Appendix G
Table G.3 Three-phase voltage-drop data (mV per ampere per metre)
Cable Size (mm2
) R X Z
4 9.5 - -
16 2.4 - -
35 1.10 0.170 1.10
50 0.80 0.165 0.82
120 0.32 0.150 0.36
300 0.13 0.140 0.190
Figure G.2
Solution to G2
The transformer impedance ZTF is (0.0016 + j0.0078) Ω. The per phase
resistance and reactance of all the cables in the earth fault loop are:
Rcable = R120 +R35 + R4 +R4 + R16 +R50 = 0.1912Ω
Xcable = X120 +X35 + X4 +X4 + X16 +X50 = 0.0028Ω
The earth fault current at the socket outlet IEF,SSO is
15.3A1191
0106.0j1928.0
230
Z+Z+Z+Z+Z+Z+Z
230
=I
50164435120TF
SSOEF,
−∠=
+
=
1 x 4 mm2, CPC, 15 m
MCB
30 A
SPN
RCCB
60 A
DP
MCCB
100 A
DP
MCCB
250 A
TPN 2 x 4 mm2
15 m
Socket
Outlet
2 x 35 mm2
10 m
4 x 120 mm2
10 m
1 x 16 mm2
CPC, 10 m
MCCB
400 A
TPN 1 x 50 mm2, CPC, 10 m
LV
1 x 300 mm2, 10 m
22 kV
ZTF = 0.0016
+ j 0.0078 Ω
(referred to LV)
0.5 Ω
Model Examination Questions with Solution 221
(b) For an earth fault current of 1196 A, the operating time of the 30 A
MCB is 0.1 s for any current exceeding 300 A. Thus, the touch voltage is
VT = ZCPC x IA = (Z4 + Z16 + Z50 ) x IA
= (0.1007 + j0.001) x 300 = 30.2 V
(c) Conditions for a TN system to have adequate protection against electric
shock are: (i) the maximum disconnection time for hand-held equipment and
for fixed equipment is 0.4 s and 5 s respectively. (ii) For hand-held
equipment, the disconnection time can be increased to 5 s if the touch
voltage is within 50 V. For protection by MCCB alone, the operating time of
the breaker for an earth fault current of 1196 A is 0.1 s which meets
condition (i). Similarly, the touch voltage is 30 V which is less than 50 V and
such touch voltage can be disconnected within 0.1 s. Thus the 60 A RCCB
can be replaced by an MCCB.
G3
In the TN-S system as shown in Figure G.3, the three-phase fault level at
D1 is 25 MVA with a X/R ratio of 5. The 50-m circuit from D1 to D2
consists of three single-core, pvc-insulated copper conductor cables of 95
mm2 with a CPC of 50 mm2. The 20-m circuit from D2 to the motor consists
of similar cables of 25 mm2 with a CPC of 10 mm2. The motor is rated at 60
kW with 90 % efficiency and 0.8 power factor. The motor has a direct-on-
line starter. The starting current is seven times the full-load current and
lasts for 10 s. Voltage-drop constants for cables at 70 degree C are given
in Table G.4. Temperature correction on the resistive value is not required.
(a) Determine the current rating and the breaking capacity of the MCCB at
D2 for the motor circuit at an ambient temperature of 40 degree C.
(10 marks)
(b) Determine the maximum allowable operating time for the MCCB at D2 if
this MCCB is designed to provide adequate short-circuit protection for a
three-phase fault at the motor terminal. The k constant of the 25-mm2
copper conductor cable is 143 at 30 degree C and 115 at 70 degree C.
(5 marks)
(c) For a short-circuit from the blue phase to the frame of the motor,
calculate the earth fault current and the touch voltages at the motor and at
the earthing terminal at D2.
(10 marks)
222 Appendix G
xx
22 kV
~
50 m
6.5 Ω
M
3 x 25 mm2 cu / pvc3 x 95 mm2 cu / pvc
60 kW
x
20 m
20 m50 m
1 x 10 mm2 cu / pvc1 x 50 mm2 cu / pvc
0.8 Ω
400 V
D1
400 V
D2
Figure G.3
Table G.4 Voltage Drop Constants
Conductor Voltage drop in mV per ampere per metre
cross-sectional
area (mm2)
2 cables
Single-phase ac
3 or 4 cables
Three-phase ac
r x Z r x z
10 4.4 0 4.4 3.8 0 3.8
25 1.75 0.20 1.75 1.5 0.25 1.55
50 0.93 0.19 0.95 0.80 0.24 0.84
95 0.47 0.18 0.50 0.41 0.23 0.47
Solution to G3
(a) IB = ( 60 x 10 ) / (0.9 x 0.8 xB
3
3 x 400) = 120 A,
IS = 7 x 120 = 840 A
The current rating of the MCCB should be higher than 840/2.2 = 382 A.
Select base MVA = 1 MVA and base voltage = 400 V. The equivalent per unit
impedance of the 25 MVA fault level is :
ZS,pu = 1 / 25 = 0.04 p.u
RS,pu = 0.04 / 26 = 0.0078 p.u. (from X/R = 5)
RS = 0.16 Ω x 0.0078 = 0.001248 Ω at 400 V
Model Examination Questions with Solution 223
XS,pu = 0.0078 x 5 = 0.039 p.u.
XS = 0.16 Ω x 0.039 = 0.00624 Ω at 400 V
Z95mm = 50x (0.41 + j0.23) / ( 3 x 1000) = 0.0118 + j 0.006639 Ω
The 3-phase fault current at D2 is
IF,3-phase,D2 = VLN / (ZS + Z95mm )
= (400 / 3 )/ (0.0131 + j0.01263) = 12,691 A ∠ - 44
The breaking capacity of the MCCB should be higher than 12,691 A.
(b) The current for a 3-phase fault at the motor terminal is:
IF,3-phase,motor = VLN / (ZS + Z95mm +Z25 )
= (400 / 3 )/ (0.03042 + j0.01552) = 6,762 A ∠ - 27
tcable, max = k2
S2
/ IF
2
= (1152
x 252
) / 6,7622
= 0.18 s
Since tMCCB is less than tcable max, this circuit provides adequate protection
against short- circuit current.
(c) The earth fault current at the motor frame is:
A2301
02245.0j0974.0
230
Z+Z+Z+Z+Z
230
=I
50102595TF
motorEF,
=
+
=
The touch voltage at the motor is:
VT =IEF,motor x (Z10 + Z50 ) = 2301 x ( 0.06698 + j0.00693) = 154.9 V
The touch voltage at the earthing terminal at D2 is:
VT,D2 = IEF,motor x Z50 = 2301 x ( 0.0231 + j0.00693 ) = 55.5 V
G4
The electrical supply to a factory using a TN-S system is shown in
Figure G.4. The 750-kVA, 6.6/0.4-kV transformer has a leakage reactance
of 5 %. The source impedance at the 6.6-kV network can be neglected. The
cable parameters of circuits A and B are given in Table G.5.
(a) Determine the current rating and the breaking capacity of the MCCB for
circuit A connecting to the motor rated at 100 kW with 90 % efficiency and
0.85 power factor. The motor has a Y-Δ starter and the starting current is
four times the full-load current for 15 s. (8 marks)
224 Appendix G
(b) Determine whether circuit A is adequately protected against overload
current and three phase short-circuit current at the motor terminals.
(8 marks)
(c) Calculate the fault current in circuit B for an earth fault at the motor
terminals and confirm whether circuit B is adequately protected against
electric shock. Verify whether the size of CPC for circuit B is appropriate.
(9 marks)
Table G.5 Cable Parameters
Circuit A Circuit B
Size 3 x 95 mm2 cu / pvc 3 x 120 mm2 cu / pvc
Phase Conductor R* 0.007 Ω per phase 0.006 Ω per phase
X* 0.004 Ω per phase 0.004 Ω per phase
IZ 207 A 239 A
Size 1 x 50 mm2 cu / pvc 1 x 50 mm2 cu / pvc
CPC R* 0.014 Ω 0.014 Ω
X* 0.003 Ω 0.003 Ω
*The values of R and X are for the whole circuit and no temperature
correction is required.
M
M
400 V
400 A
MCCB
MCCB
Circuit B
150 kW
750 kVA
5 %
6.6 kV
Circuit A
100 kW
Figure G.4
Solution to G4
(a) IB = (100 x 10 ) / (0.9 x 0.85 xB
3
3 x 400) = 189 A
IS = 4 x 189 = 756 A
The current rating of the MCCB should be higher than 756/2 = 378 A. A
current rating of 400 A is recommended. For a base of 0.75 MVA and 400
V, the per unit impedance is 0.213 Ω and the per unit current is 1083 A. The
three-phase short-circuit current at the MCCB terminal is
IF,3-phase = 1 / 0.05 = 20 per-unit current = 21.66 kA
Model Examination Questions with Solution 225
Thus, the breaking capacity of the 400 A MCCB should be higher than 21.66
kA and a breaking capacity of 25 kA is recommended.
(b) Required conditions for protection against overload are:
(i) IN ≤ IZ (ii) I2 ≤ 1.45 IZ
For circuit A
IN =400 A, IZ = 207 A, I2 = 1.3 x 400 A =520 A,
1.45 IZ = 1.45 x 207 A =300 A
Since conditions (i) and (ii) are not satisfied, circuit A is not protected
against overload current accordingly to IEE Regulation 433. The 3-phase
fault current at the motor terminal is 14.15 kA and the tcable max is 0.59 s.
Since the breaker operating time for a current of 14.15 kA is 0.017 s, (from
Fig. 2.13), circuit A is adequately protected against short-circuit currents.
(c) The earth fault current at the motor frame is:
A623,8
01765.0j02.0
230
Z+Z+Z
230
=I
50120TF
Bcircuitmotor,EF,
=
+
=
The operating time of the 400 A MCCB at a current of 8623 A is 0.017 s
which is less than the required 5 s. Thus circuit B satisfies the protection
against electric shock. The maximum time for the CPC to withstand the
earth fault current of 8623 A is 0.69 s which is greater than the breaker
operating time of 0.017 s. Thus, the size of the CPC is appropriate.
G5
The electrical supply to a factory is fed by a 1.6-MVA, 22/0.4-kV
transformer that has a reactance of 6 % as shown in Figure 3. The
resistance of the transformer is negligible. All the MCCBs have the same
time-current characteristic as given in Table G.1. The current ratings and
the values of resistance and reactance of each circuit are given in Table 2.
a) Recommend the current rating and the minimum breaking capacity of the
MCCB for the circuit connecting to the motor, which is rated at 25 kW, 90
% efficiency and 0.9 power factor. The motor utilises a DOL starter. The
starting current is seven times the full-load current and such a current
would exist for 10 s. (8 marks)
226 Appendix G
b) Determine whether the 200-A MCCB for the 4 x 95 mm2 circuit can
adequately protect against overload current. State the range of small
overload for which this circuit is not protected. If the maximum operating
time of the 200-A MCCB is 0.03 s, determine whether the MCCB can
adequately protect against short-circuit current for a three-phase fault at
the final DB. (9 marks)
c) Determine the magnitude of the earth-fault current for an earth
fault at the motor terminals and confirm whether the motor circuit has
adequate protection against electric shock? Give reasons with calculation.
(8 marks)
××
400 V
MCCB
22 kV
4 x 95 mm2
MCCB
4 x 25 mm2
1.6 MVA
200 A
6 %
M
1 x 50 mm2
Final DB0.9 Ω
1 x 10 mm2
1 x 300 mm2
1 x 300 mm2
100 A
25 kW
Figure G.5
Table G.6 Cable Characteristic
Cable Size Current rating Resistance* Reactance*
4 x 95 mm2 207 A 0.007 Ω 0.004 Ω
4 x 25 mm2 89 A 0.008 Ω 0.002 Ω
1 x 50 mm2 - 0.014 Ω 0.003 Ω
1 x 10 mm2 - 0.022 Ω 0.0 Ω
1 x 300 mm2 - 0.0 Ω 0.0 Ω
* for the whole circuit length and no temperature correction is required
Model Examination Questions with Solution 227
Solution to G5
(a) IB = ( 25 x 10 ) / (0.9 x 0.9 xB
3
3 x 400) = 44.55 A,
IS = 7 x 44.55 = 312 A
The current rating of the MCCB should be higher than 312/3.3 = 94.5 A.
For a base of 1.6 MVA and 0.4 kV, the reactance of the transformer is:
XS = 0.1 Ω x 0.06 = 0.006 Ω at 400 V
The 3-phase fault current at the final DB is:
IF,3-phase,final DB = VLN / (ZS + Z95mm )
=(400 / 3 )/ (0.007 + j0.01) = 18.9 kA ∠ - 55
tcable,max = k2
S2
/ IF
2
= (1152
x 952
) / 18,9002
= 0.334 s
The minimum breaking capacity of the MCCB should be higher than the 3-
phase fault current at the final DB(i.e. 18.9 kA).
(b) Required conditions for protection against overload:
(i) IN < IZ (ii) I2 < 1.45 IZ
For the 4 x 95 mm2
circuit,
IN =200 A, IZ = 207 A, I2 = 1.3 x 200 A = 260 A,
1.45 IZ = 1.45 x 207 A =300 A
Conditions (i) and (ii) are satisfied and this circuit is adequately protected
against overload current. The range of small overload that this circuit is
not protected is from 207.1 A to 259.9 A. Since tcable,max is greater than
0.03 s, this circuit is adequately protected against short-circuit current.
(c) The earth fault current at the motor frame is:
A4326
015.0j051.0
230
Z+Z+Z+Z+Z+Z
230
=I
30050102595TF
motorEF,
=
+
=
The operating time of the 100 A MCCB at a current of 4326 A is 0.03 s
which is less than the required 5 s and thus it provides adequate protection
against electric shock.
228
APPENDIX H
VipCoda
VipCoda: Visually Interactive Program for Consultant and Owner to Design
and Assess electrical systems in building.
By utilizing the visually interactive window programming technique and
facilities on database access, VipCoda provides an user friendly, visually
interactive tool to automate the design process producing a sound and
reliable design which meets the code of practice of CP5 (1998) and
BS 7671:1992 (IEE wiring regulations, 16th
Edition). VipCoda can also be
used to automatically assess and evaluate any submitted electrical network
systematically within a short time. By utilizing the built-in database
structure, all the design assumptions are automatically documented and
stored together with the completed design network. Thus, it is also a
comprehensive tool for training and upgrading engineers on how to design
and assess an electrical network.
The completed design including all the technical parameters can be
displayed and viewed in exactly the same presentation as reading a single-
line diagram generated by AutoCAD. In addition, the calculated fault level
and the cumulative voltage drops from the main incoming circuit up to each
final circuit are graphically displayed. Facilities are provided to simulate
the normal loading, overloading, short circuit and earth fault conditions. A
result of pass or fail will be given by assessing through seven critical tests
and three non-critical tests. A full explanation as to why, how and by how
much the design fails will also be included.
H1. Design Element Database
All the cable tables given in the IEE wiring regulation and CP5 (1998) are
structurally stored in the cable database grouped according to the
conductor material, insulation material, and cable construction and
installation methods. In addition, fire resistant cables and busways are also
represented. Currently, eight types of cables, namely copper PVC, copper
MICC, aluminum PVC, aluminum XLPE, copper XLPE, copper fire resistant,
copper busway and aluminum busway are available in 969 records. The
installation methods include clipped direct, conduit/trunking, thermal
insulation and tray for single-core non-armored, multi-core non-armored,
single-core armored and multi-core-armored cables. All the cables can be
VipCoda 229
interactively selected from a number of simple dialogue boxes and built-in
facilities are provided for the user to have a speed search for all CP5 cable
tables.
Five types of overcurrent protective device, namely ACB, MCCB, MCB, RCCB
and fuse are represented. The complete range of the preferred rated
current and breaking capacity from the relevant BS and IEC standard are
included in a total of 106 records for breakers and fuses. Four types of
typical time-current characteristic curves for breaker and fuses are
modeled. Current transformers and earth fault relays by IDMT, DTL and
ELR are available.
H2. Simulation and Testing
Seven types of critical tests and two types of non-critical tests are
conducted for each circuit in each DB to assess whether a given design is
acceptable under normal loading, overloading and short-circuit conditions.
Breaker and Cable Load Test. Compute design current (IB) and the rated
circuit capacity (I
B
Z) by considering the ambient temperature and grouping
factor. Based on the current rating of the protective device (IN), detect
whether IN > IBB and IZ > IB. Compute the circuit loading in percentage of the
rated capacity under the specified conditions.
B
Overload Protection Test. Increase the load current in each circuit to
145% of the rated circuit capacity (IZ) and model the operating time of the
protective device. Detect whether the operating time of the protective
device is less than the effective operating time of 2 hours. ( i.e. I2 < 1.45 IZ
and IN < IZ)
Voltage Drop Test. Calculate the voltage drops in volts and in percentage
of the rated operating voltage. Check whether the voltage drop is within
the required voltage drop tolerance.
Short circuit Protection Test. Calculate the 3-phase short-circuit current
at the end of each circuit. Check whether the braking capacity of the
protective device is higher than the calculated short-circuit current. Model
the operating time of protective device under the fault condition. Detect
whether the circuit will be disconnected within the critical time, which is
the maximum allowable time in seconds to ensure that the temperature in
the conductor will not exceed its thermal limit resulting in a failure in
insulation material.
230 Appendix H
Earth Fault and CPC Test. Calculate the earth fault current at the end of
each circuit. Detect whether the cable size of each circuit protective
conductor (CPC) is adequate to withstand the earth fault current.
Motor Starting Test. Based on the type of starter and the motor rating,
calculate the motor starting current. Model the operating time of the
protective device and detect whether the protective device will trip during
the starting period. Based on the circuit impedance and the source
impedance, calculate the voltage dips at the instant when the motor starts.
Detect whether the voltage dips will release the contactor in the starter.
Electric Shock Protection Test. Calculate the earth fault current and the
touch voltage at the end of each circuit. Based on the IEE regulations and
solely based on the direct acting overcurrent protective device, check
whether the touch voltage is less than 50 V and whether the disconnection
time is less than 5 s for a TT system. For a TN system, the earth fault loop
impedance is calculated and a check is made to detect whether the
disconnection time is less than 0.4 s for hand-held equipment and 5 s for
fixed equipment. If the direct acting overcurrent protective device fails to
provide the requirements for electric shock protection, the relevant
residual protective devices such as RCCB, ELR, E/F and IDMT will be
suggested. The operating time is modeled based on the specified CT ratio,
time and current settings of the device. The user will be prompted to
specify new settings until the requirement on electric shock protection is
met.
H3. Computer-aided Interactive Design
The user may carry out the design work for a main switchboard (MSW), a
main distribution board (MDB) or a final distribution board (FDB). Facilities
are provided for the user to link the complete network by backward
chaining from FDB, MDB to MSW, or a forward chaining from MSW, MDB
to FDB. For each circuit, based on the user’s specification on the required
type of load and power rating, type of cable, circuit length, fault level of
the incoming source etc, the program automates the design process and
shows the appropriate breaker and cable including CPC in a single line
diagram. Through several built-in rules, the automated design done by
VipCoda will ensure that it meets all the seven critical tests.
The user may simply click on the single line diagram to change a breaker or
a cable in any circuit, or to enter a design done by a contractor. The user
may click the ‘speed test’ button to obtain summaries of those tests that
VipCoda 231
have detected failure. The user may then click for a particular test to find
out the cause of failure or click the ‘redesign’ button to carry out a
redesign by the program for one particular circuit, the whole DB or the
entire project to automatically rectify all the design errors. Options are
provided for load balancing either manually or automatically.
Facilities are provided for the user to list or print a technical summary or a
cost summary of the whole project. In the technical summary, all the DBs in
the specified project are tabulated together with the maximum demand,
fault current, earth fault current and the cumulative voltage drop at each
DB. For cost summary, the cost for each DB and the total cost of the
whole project are listed with breakdown in cable and breaker costs. Tools
are also provided for the user to delete or insert a circuit, copy a DB to a
project or create a project by modifying from a list of standard projects
or previously completed projects. Utilities are also provided for the user to
print the single line diagram of a particular DB together with the result of
each simulation test.
H4. Project Database
The successfully designed network of a project can be saved by the built-in
project database. This database contains the description of all the
switchboards and DBs of the whole project in an automatically arranged
structure. Built-in editing facilities are provided for the user to view or
edit the project database, design element database or lookup tables that
contain the design rules and design assumptions. For verification and
confirmation that the design process by VipCoda is accurate, three
benchmark projects have been created with all the connected loads and
design assumptions specified. In these three benchmark networks, the
completed design done by VipCoda represents the unique solution that
meets all the given design requirements and specifications, and at the same
time there is no over-design in any circuit. Thus the completed network
given by VipCoda can be used as a reference to compare a design done
manually or by using any other computer aided design program.
H5. Visual User Interface
VipCoda utilizes all standard Window facilities such as pull down menus,
pop-up windows, symbolic icons and various visually interactive dialogue
boxes, etc. It is arranged such that all the menus, icons and dialogue boxes
are self-documented. The user may simply click a load icon to view the
detailed load information, click a circuit icon to view or change the type of
cable, temperature correction and grouping factor or click a breaker icon
to re-specify the type of breaker or its tripping curve. Tools are provided
232 Appendix H
for the user to have an enlarged view on a DB or an overview of the whole
project including riser with tap-off and the incoming transformer
connection.
H6. Related Publications
[1] Teo C Y, “A new integrated tool for exercises on the design of
electrical installations using a microcomputer”, Electric Power Systems
Research, Vol. 36, No. 1 PP 81-91, 1996.
[2] Teo C Y, “Computer aided design and simulation of low voltage electrical
distribution systems”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 34, No. 1, PP 87-94,
1997.
[3] Teo C Y, Shen Feng, “Application of artificial intelligence in the design
of low voltage electrical system”, Proceeding of the 2000 IEEE Winter
Meeting, pp 1784-1789, Vol. 3, 2000.
[4] Teo C Y, “An innovative program for the design and assessment of
electrical system in buildings”, IEM Bulletin, pp 46-49, 2001.
[5] Teo C Y, “Integrated Assessment of Electrical Systems in Buildings
Through Simulation Tests”, The Singapore Engineers, pp 27-32, 2003
H7 Contact Details
E-mail: cyteo@ntu.edu.sg, URL: www.byte-power.com, Tel: (65) 6256 0101
233
APPENDIX I
VipTein
VipTein: Visually Interactive Package for the Teaching of Electrical
Installation Network in buildings
An innovative approach using computer aided design tools to support the
teaching of electrical installation through hands-on design exercises is
described. It is implemented by an integrated package with all the built-in
facilities, which guide students step by step to complete the design of two
sizeable electrical installations. The dedicated database structure enables
students to get direct access to the building information, details of each
type of load and the technical parameters of all the electrical parts
required for the design exercise. The built-in dynamic test specification
eliminates routine and repetitive design studies and also accelerates the
design and learning process. Each error made by each student is prompted
on the spot and after each second attempt; the right answer and the
student’s wrong answer are shown for comparison. The performance of
each student is evaluated automatically through error logs and is
summarized by showing the total number of demerit points, which is then
converted to a grade of A B C D or E.
I1. Training Scope
The integrated package is designed to familiarize students with the
criteria and procedure for the design of electrical installations in buildings.
It guides the student to complete the whole design process. By displaying
the floor plan and the connected loads, the student can practise on the
estimation of maximum demand based on an assumed demand factor or
coincidence factor, and the determination of the design current for various
circuits including the incoming circuit. The student can also practise on the
selection of appropriate types of breakers, current ratings and the
category of duty against overcurrent, fault current and electric shock. It
is then followed by the choice of conductor material, type of insulation,
installation method and the determination of conductor size. Correction
factors to cater for circuit grouping, ambient temperature and thermal
insulation as well as voltage drop and motor-starting conditions will be
included. Various methods to determine the size of protective conductor,
234 Appendix I
and the requirements for individual main incoming circuit including current
transformers (CT) for protection and for measurement will be assessed.
Knowledge of wiring regulations and the standard code of practice for
electrical installation will be inherently acquired through the design
process.
I2. Size of Design
The main menu provides access to the two modules i.e. assess 1 and assess
2. In assess 1, the student is given a hands-on exercise to complete the
design of a TT system of a two-level building, which has two shops on each
floor. Each shop has a final DB serving a floor area of 15 m x 10 m. The two
final DBs on each floor are fed by a main DB, which is then connected to a
cable riser. The main switchboard feeds one cable riser, a 55 kW DOL
motor, an 80 kW star-delta motor and a DB with an equivalent load of 90
kW. This module allows the student to go through the program once and to
familiarise themselves with tools provided in the package as well as the
method of design.
In assess 2, the student has to complete a sizeable design of 2 MVA
electrical installations with two incoming busbars, one emergency busbar
and one stand-by generator. A 3-D view and a typical floor plan of a seven-
level flatted factor will be displayed. On each level, there are four tenant
DBs, one landlord DB and one emergency DB. As level 1 to level 7 are
identical, the student only needs to complete the design for one level and
the package will make identical copies for all other six levels. At the end of
the design, the student will be prompted to determine breaker type and
size for each incoming circuit. The student is required to verify the earth
fault protection. At the end of the module, the student’s performance is
evaluated and given in an overall score summary.
I3. Visual User Interface
VipTein utilizes all standard Window facilities such as pull down menus, pop-
up windows, symbolic icons and various visually interactive dialogue boxes,
etc. It is arranged such that all the menus, icons and dialogue boxes are
self-documented. At run time, the student may simply click the Hint label
to view the relevant formulae or the Legend label for the relevant
description. Warning and guiding messages such as cable or breaker under
size or oversize will be displayed accordingly whenever the student makes a
mistake and all the relevant data such as load description, cable
Viptein 235
specification, etc will also be listed for the student to make the right
selection. For each test, in the first attempt, if the answer given by the
student is wrong, the relevant formulae will be given. In the second
attempt, if the answer is still wrong, VipTein will show the student’s wrong
answer together with the correct answer. A well-done message will be
always prompted whenever the student enters the right answer. To keep
the student informed on the performance and status, the student’s current
cumulated demerit points and the number of outstanding buses are
displayed at the beginning of each section. For short circuit analysis,
relevant breaker’s tripping curves and cable withstand limit are graphically
shown. Tools are provided for the student to have an enlarged view on a DB
or an overview of the whole project including riser with tap-off and the
incoming transformer connection.
I4. Assessment Criteria and Grading
The evaluation of a trainee’s performance focuses on ten categories,
namely circuit breaker selection, design current calculation, cable sizing,
short circuit analysis, earth fault analysis, motor starting, voltage drop
calculation, load connection and load balance. All errors made by the
student are logged and evaluated automatically by demerit points. The
instructor may adjust the number of demerit points for each type of error
and the conversion from the total demerit points to an appropriate grade.
I5. Dynamic Instructor Control
VipTein provides built-in features for the instructor to specify a total of
28 tests grouped under 10 categories in a test specification database file.
It is also structured according to three main options, namely technical
college, polytechnic and university. In each option, the instructor may
specify the number and identification of each DB in assess 1 and in assess
2. For each DB, the instructor may specify the desired types of test
according to the students’ capability. In general, the test file for technical
college will be easier and that for university will be more difficult and each
could be focused on different categories. To eliminate repetitive
calculation, for some tests that involve a number of steps, the instructor
can specify a step number in the test and the system will give the relevant
answer of the previous step and jump to the specified steps to test a
student. In this way, although the type of building is identical, the scope,
duration and depth of study can be dynamically adjusted.
236 Appendix I
I6. Related Publications
[1] Gooi H. B., Teo C. Y., “A Project-oriented Power Engineering
Curriculum”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 10, No. 1, PP
27-33, 1995
[2] Teo C. Y., “A New Integrated Tool for Design Exercise of Electrical
Installations Using a Microcomputer “ Journal of Electric Power
Systems Research, Vol. 36, No. 2, PP 81-90, 1996
[3] Teo C Y , “ A More Practical Approach to Integrate Low Voltage
Distribution System into the Electrical Engineering Curriculum”,
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp 1199-1204,
1998
[4] Teo C Y and F. Shen, “Application of Artificial Intelligence in the
Design of Low Voltage Electrical System”, IEEE Winter Meeting
2000
[5] Teo C Y, ”Integrated Assessment of Electrical Systems in Buildings
Through Simulation Tests” Magazine of Singapore Engineer, pp 31-
36, 2003
[6] Teo Cheng Yu, “Teaching of Power Engineering Through E-learning
with Laboratory Automated Assessment”, ICEE, International
Conference on Engineering and Education, March 2009
I7 Contact Details
E-mail: cyteo@ntu.edu.sg, URL: www.byte-power.com, Tel: (65) 6256 0101
237
INDEX
32M63, 119
Accuracy and comparison, 171
Active connected load, 137
Actual required power, 127
Adiabatic equation, 75, 76
Admittance matrix, 161
Air circuit-breaker (ACB), 37
Ambient temperature correction factor
(Ca), 55
American National Standards Institute
(ANSI), 28
Arc chutes, 27
Arc extinction, 27
Arc voltage, 27
Arc-extinguishing, 104
Arcing time, 106
Assessment and costing, 178
Automated marking and grading, 187
Automatic disconnection of supply, 92
Automatic drafting, 179
Automatic interruption, 23
Automatic operation, 93
AWG/MCM, 54
Back-up for circuit breakers, 122
Back-up protection, 122, 12
Base current, 155
Base impedance, 155
Basic design procedure, 132
Bi-metallic overload trip, 24
Breaker and cable load test, 182
Breaking capacity, 23, 105, 122, 123,
143
British Standard (BS), 28
BS88 fuse, 47
Built-in overcurrent tripping device, 37
Built-in overload release, 70
Cable’s withstand capability, 76
Cable construction, 50
Cable selection, 53
Cable utilisation test, 182
Cable utilisation, 68
CAD package, 173
Calculation of short-circuit currents,
153
Capacitance effect, 84
Characteristics of generating plants, 3
Circuit loading, 137
Circuit protective conductor, 87
Class I equipment, 86, 93
Coincidence factor, 129, 141
Common base values, 155, 161
Complex matrix, 163
Computational flow chart, 163
Computer-aided design, 173
Conductor material, 55
Conductor temperature on voltage drop,
64
Conductor temperature, 78
Conduits and trunking systems, 52
Consumer installations, 17
Conventional fusing current (If), 105
Conventional non-fusing current (Inf),
105
Conventional time, 105
Correction factor, 55
Cost of distribution system, 2
Critical conductor temperature, 78
Critical operating times, 143, 144
Critical temperature, 66, 72
Critical time, 72, 149
Current limiting system, 27
Current rating, 31, 36
Cut-off current, 106, 107
D.C. testing after installation, 54
Degree of overload protection, 67
Delta-earthed wye connection, 80, 82
Demand factor, 127, 139
Demerit point system, 186, 187
Design current, 46, 58, 126
Design elements, 173, 181
Design files, 177, 178
Design methods, 177
Design procedures, 125, 131
Direct contact, 51, 125
Disconnection time, 120
Discrete drawing elements, 181
Discrimination, 121, 122
Distribution system, 8
Diversity, 131
Drafting module, 181
Drawing files, 180
Earth electrode resistance, 95
238 Index
Earth electrode, 89
Earth fault current, 80
Earth fault loop impedance, 89, 93, 96
Earth fault protection, 92, 149
Earth leakage current, 41, 42
Earthing conductor, 89
Earthing in utility system, 80
Earthing, 80
Effective operating time, 66
Effective operation, 71
Electric shock, 39, 40, 92, 98, 120, 125
Electromagnetic trip, 24, 26, 29, 94
Emergency distribution board, 147
Equipotential bonding conductor, 88
Equipotential zone, 89, 90
Equivalent resistance network, 159, 160
European Standards (EN), 28
Exposed-conductive parts, 40, 86,125
External earth fault loop impedance, 99
Extraneous-conductive parts, 86
Fault current calculation, 165
Fault current distribution, 164
Fault level, 154, 165
Final circuit, 126
Fire resistant cables, 53
Full and partial test, 187
Fuse factors, 113
Fuse-base, 104
Fuse-holder, 104
Gates for fuse, 110
General purpose socket outlets, 129,
130
Generation expansion planning, 1
Generation System, 3
gG fuse-links, 105, 107, 110
Ground-return circuit, 153
Grouping correction factor (Cg), 56, 57
Hands-on design exercises, 186
High breaking fuses, 112
High impedance earth fault, 40
High-resistance earthing, 84
I2
t, 106, 107
IDMT relay, 102
Indirect contact, 39, 92, 125
Industrial lighting, 130
Industrial standards, 28
Installation earthing, 86
Installation methods, 55
Instantaneous tripping, 31
Insulating materials, 53, 55
Integrated drawing elements, 181
Integrated tools for teaching, 186
Interconnected network cut, 11
International Electromechanical
Commission (IEC), 28
Inverted Y-matrix, 161
IT system, 85, 92
Let-through operating I2
t, 117
Lighting circuit, 131
Lighting in building, 130
Line-to-line fault, 77
Line-to-neutral short-circuit current,
79
Line-to-neutral fault, 77
Live conductive part, 40
Load estimation, 129
Load flow simulation, 8
Loss of discrimination, 125
Low breaking fuses, 112
Low-impedance path, 86
Low-voltage (LV) system, 13
Low-voltage fuses, 112
M9, 31
Main and backup protections, 12
Main contacts, 41
Main equipotential bonding, 89, 95
Main incoming circuit, 142
Maintenance free, 30
Making capacity, 23, 24
Maximum break time, 44
Maximum demand, 3, 126, 127, 129, 131,
139, 141
Maximum disconnection time, 93, 102
Maximum earth fault current, 82
Maximum earth fault loop impedance,
120, 121
Maximum operating time, 72
Maximum running capacity, 4
Maximum short-circuit current, 153
Maximum time delay, 102
MCCB standards, 35
Methods of system earthing, 82
Mineral insulated metal sheathed
cables, 53
Miniature circuit-breakers (MCB), 29
Miniature fuses, 111
Index 239
Minimum tabulated current rating, 70
MIPTEIN, 173, 181, 188
Modelling and checking processes, 173
Motor circuit, 118, 135
Motor starting current, 46, 118
Motor starting test, 185
Motor-operated mechanism, 34
Moulded case circuit breakers (MCCB),
33
National Electrical Manufacturers
Association (NEMA), 28
Non-destructive performance, 33
OG boxes, 116
OL_P_Yes, 67, 68
Omission of overload protection, 69
Operating cost, 4
Operating I2
t, 118, 121
Operating time, 26, 45
Operating-arcing I2
t , 124
Operation of RCCBs, 42
Overground (OG) boxes, 15
Overload protection test, 183
Partial design, 187
Plug setting, 102
Power dissipation, 111, 113
Pre-arcing I2
t, 106 , 121, 123
Pre-arcing time, 106
Preferred operating conditions, 58
Principle of operation, 41
Prospective current, 105, 106
Protection against overload, 65
Protection against short circuit, 71
Protection on TN system, 92
Protection on TT system, 95
Protective conductor, 86, 88, 90
PVC-sheathed cables, 53
Q1 fuse-links, 116
Quick-acting, 111
Radial circuit arrangement, 10, 133
Radially operated LV network, 17
Range of small overload, 67
Rated breaking capacity, 36, 39
Rated conditional short-circuit current,
44
Rated current (IN), 23
Rated current, 39
Rated making capacity, 36
Rated residual operating current, 43
RCCB standards, 43
Reactance earthing, 84, 85
Reactive connected load, 137
Record structure, 173
Required conditions for overload
protection, 66
Required conditions for short circuit
protection, 71
Residual current device, 94
Residual current, 40
Residual current-operated circuit
breaker (RCCB), 39
Resistance earthing, 84
Resistance-earthed neutral, 82, 84
Resistance-temperature coefficient, 63
Ring circuit arrangement, 11, 133
SC_P_Yes, 72
Schemes of connection, 9
Search coil, 41
Separate X and R reductions, 155
Service continuity, 83
Shock voltage, 91, 95
Short circuit protection, 148
Short circuit thermal stresses, 52
Short-circuit capacity, 31
Short-circuit protection test, 184
Short-circuit protection, 142
Shut trip elements, 34
Simulation tests, 181
Singapore Standard (SS), 28
Equivalent impedance, 165, 170
Single-line diagram, 19, 140, 180
Sizing of conductor, 50
Sm_OL_No, 68
Small overloads, 68
Solidly earthed system, 80, 84, 85
Solidly grounded, 153
Source of fault currents, 153
Specific resistance, 51
Specified time, 93
Standard code for diversity, 130
Standard size of conductors, 54
Start-up cost, 4
Starter with overload release, 69
Starting condition, 119
Status switches, 34
Step-by-step calculations, 154
Step-by-step design procedures, 18
240 Index
Sub-transient reactance, 154
Supply interruption, 125
Synchronous reactance, 154
System earth, 80
System fault levels, 7
System frequency responses, 4
System neutral, 80
Systematic calculation, 161
Tabulated current carrying capacities
(It), 55
Tabulated current rating, 58
Tabulated voltage drop constant (TVD),
60
Tabulated voltage-drop constant, 78
Tap-off unit, 168
Temperature correction on resistive
value, 63
Tenant distribution board, 19
Testing on completed cables, 53
Thermal capacity constant, 88
Thermal constraint, 101
Thermal damage, 74, 124
Thermal insulation correction factor
(Ci), 59
Thermal limit, 102, 143, 149
Thermal trip,24, 25, 29
Three-phase fault, 77, 153
Time multiplier setting (TMS), 102
Time-current characteristic, 24, 31, 32,
41
Time-current zone, 109, 110, 115
Time-lag, 111
TN-C-S system, 91
TN-S system, 90, 91, 99
Total connected load, 126, 127
Total system investment, 2
Touch voltage, 89, 92
Transformer impedance, 155
Transient conditions, 60
Transient overvoltage, 84
Transient reactance, 154
Transmission network, 1
Transmission system, 4
Trip coil, 41
Trip-free operation, 34
Tripping mechanisms, 24
Tripping time, 26
TT system, 88, 120
Turbo Pascal, 174
Type B MCB, 47
Type C MCB, 33
Typical LV board, 16
Typical OG box, 16
Typical values of k, 72
Underwriters Labs (UL), 28
Unearthed system, 82, 84
Unit commitment, 5
Unit protection, 12
Utilisation voltage, 5
Utility fault level, 155
Utility LV networks, 13
Verification of discrimination, 178
Voltage drop calculation, 60, 61
Voltage drop constraints, 146
Voltage drop formulae, 61
Voltage drop requirements, 52
Voltage drop test, 184
Y-matrix, 163
Zero point extinguishing system, 27
Zones of unit protection, 14

More Related Content

PPTX
SUBSTATION DESIGN powerpoint presentation.pptx
PDF
Typical Electrical Design philosophy.
PDF
Electrical Design calculations
PPTX
Electrical installation for commercial &amp; public building
PDF
Building Electrical Systems Design
PPTX
Calculation of short circuit currents
PPTX
Cable sizing.pptx
SUBSTATION DESIGN powerpoint presentation.pptx
Typical Electrical Design philosophy.
Electrical Design calculations
Electrical installation for commercial &amp; public building
Building Electrical Systems Design
Calculation of short circuit currents
Cable sizing.pptx

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Maintenance schedule of Substation.
PPTX
Ehv substation
PDF
Principles of Cable Sizing
PDF
INSULATORS AND ITS TYPES
PPT
Testing and Condition Monitoring of Substation Equipments
PPTX
Design and construction of underground cable transmission line
PDF
Bill of Material of 132/33 KV 15 MVA Pooling Substation (15-07-2019)
PDF
Siemens MV GIS Switchgear
PPTX
Fault Level Calculation
PDF
Cable sizing to withstand short-circuit current - Example
PDF
Cable fault location methods (Megger)
PPTX
PDF
Fat procedure for lv switchboards
PPTX
Underground cables
PDF
HV/ MV SWG basics
PPTX
Ring main unit presenattion
PDF
Switchgear presentation
PPTX
Basics of Wires and Cables
PPT
132 33kv substation
Maintenance schedule of Substation.
Ehv substation
Principles of Cable Sizing
INSULATORS AND ITS TYPES
Testing and Condition Monitoring of Substation Equipments
Design and construction of underground cable transmission line
Bill of Material of 132/33 KV 15 MVA Pooling Substation (15-07-2019)
Siemens MV GIS Switchgear
Fault Level Calculation
Cable sizing to withstand short-circuit current - Example
Cable fault location methods (Megger)
Fat procedure for lv switchboards
Underground cables
HV/ MV SWG basics
Ring main unit presenattion
Switchgear presentation
Basics of Wires and Cables
132 33kv substation
Ad

Similar to Principles and Design of LV System (20)

PDF
Surge Protection for Low Voltage Systems First Edition Alain Rousseau
PDF
Electrical-Power-Systems-by-C.L.WADHWA.pdf
PDF
Basics of power system design.pdf for student
PDF
Lightning Interaction With Power Systems Fundamentals And Modelling Volume 1 ...
PDF
Surge Protection For Low Voltage Systems First Alain Rousseau
PDF
Lightninginduced Effects In Electrical And Telecommunication Systems Yoshihir...
PDF
Diagnosis And Fault Tolerance Of Electrical Machines Power Electronics And Dr...
PDF
High Voltage Engineering and Testing 3rd Edition Hugh M. Ryan
PDF
High Voltage Engineering and Testing 3rd Edition Hugh M. Ryan
PDF
High Voltage Engineering and Testing 3rd Edition Hugh M. Ryan
PDF
Lightning Electromagnetics, Volume 2: Return Electrical processes and effects...
PDF
Protection Of Electricity Distribution Networks Juan M Gers E J Holmes
PDF
Lithiumion Batteries Enabled By Silicon Anodes Energy Engineering Chunmei Ban
PDF
Electric Fuses: Fundamentals and new applications 4th Edition Nigel P.M. Nurse
PDF
Analysis and Design of Low-Voltage Power Systems An Engineers Field Guide by ...
PDF
Grigsby, L. - Power Systems (CRC Press, 2007).pdf
PPT
mohan
PPTX
Protection & switchgear
PDF
Protection of Electricity Distribution Networks 3rd Edition Juan M. Gers
PPTX
PMR Science Chapter 8 Generation of Electricity
Surge Protection for Low Voltage Systems First Edition Alain Rousseau
Electrical-Power-Systems-by-C.L.WADHWA.pdf
Basics of power system design.pdf for student
Lightning Interaction With Power Systems Fundamentals And Modelling Volume 1 ...
Surge Protection For Low Voltage Systems First Alain Rousseau
Lightninginduced Effects In Electrical And Telecommunication Systems Yoshihir...
Diagnosis And Fault Tolerance Of Electrical Machines Power Electronics And Dr...
High Voltage Engineering and Testing 3rd Edition Hugh M. Ryan
High Voltage Engineering and Testing 3rd Edition Hugh M. Ryan
High Voltage Engineering and Testing 3rd Edition Hugh M. Ryan
Lightning Electromagnetics, Volume 2: Return Electrical processes and effects...
Protection Of Electricity Distribution Networks Juan M Gers E J Holmes
Lithiumion Batteries Enabled By Silicon Anodes Energy Engineering Chunmei Ban
Electric Fuses: Fundamentals and new applications 4th Edition Nigel P.M. Nurse
Analysis and Design of Low-Voltage Power Systems An Engineers Field Guide by ...
Grigsby, L. - Power Systems (CRC Press, 2007).pdf
mohan
Protection & switchgear
Protection of Electricity Distribution Networks 3rd Edition Juan M. Gers
PMR Science Chapter 8 Generation of Electricity
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Geodesy 1.pptx...............................................
PPTX
Sustainable Sites - Green Building Construction
DOCX
ASol_English-Language-Literature-Set-1-27-02-2023-converted.docx
PPTX
FINAL REVIEW FOR COPD DIANOSIS FOR PULMONARY DISEASE.pptx
PPTX
CYBER-CRIMES AND SECURITY A guide to understanding
PPT
Introduction, IoT Design Methodology, Case Study on IoT System for Weather Mo...
PPT
Total quality management ppt for engineering students
PDF
Mohammad Mahdi Farshadian CV - Prospective PhD Student 2026
PDF
Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) Alliance Vision Paper.pdf
PDF
PPT on Performance Review to get promotions
PPT
Project quality management in manufacturing
PPTX
Artificial Intelligence
PPT
introduction to datamining and warehousing
PPTX
MET 305 2019 SCHEME MODULE 2 COMPLETE.pptx
PDF
III.4.1.2_The_Space_Environment.p pdffdf
PDF
Human-AI Collaboration: Balancing Agentic AI and Autonomy in Hybrid Systems
PDF
null (2) bgfbg bfgb bfgb fbfg bfbgf b.pdf
PPTX
Fundamentals of Mechanical Engineering.pptx
PDF
R24 SURVEYING LAB MANUAL for civil enggi
PPTX
additive manufacturing of ss316l using mig welding
Geodesy 1.pptx...............................................
Sustainable Sites - Green Building Construction
ASol_English-Language-Literature-Set-1-27-02-2023-converted.docx
FINAL REVIEW FOR COPD DIANOSIS FOR PULMONARY DISEASE.pptx
CYBER-CRIMES AND SECURITY A guide to understanding
Introduction, IoT Design Methodology, Case Study on IoT System for Weather Mo...
Total quality management ppt for engineering students
Mohammad Mahdi Farshadian CV - Prospective PhD Student 2026
Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) Alliance Vision Paper.pdf
PPT on Performance Review to get promotions
Project quality management in manufacturing
Artificial Intelligence
introduction to datamining and warehousing
MET 305 2019 SCHEME MODULE 2 COMPLETE.pptx
III.4.1.2_The_Space_Environment.p pdffdf
Human-AI Collaboration: Balancing Agentic AI and Autonomy in Hybrid Systems
null (2) bgfbg bfgb bfgb fbfg bfbgf b.pdf
Fundamentals of Mechanical Engineering.pptx
R24 SURVEYING LAB MANUAL for civil enggi
additive manufacturing of ss316l using mig welding

Principles and Design of LV System

  • 1. 2nd Edition – PDF Version Principles and Design of LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEM Teo Cheng Yu Byte Power Publications
  • 2. About this Book As a clear and up-to-date guide, this book presents the principles and design for low-voltage system at both the device and system levels. It provides the characteristics, specifications and industrial standards for circuit breakers, cabling, earthing and fuses. Utility supply system, utility earthing system and consumer earthing system are introduced. Standard design procedures, the latest code of practice, IEE wiring regulations, overcurrent and earth-fault protection are illustrated through a series of comprehensive and interesting examples which are particularly useful for the practicing engineers and students. Applications of computer-aided design and simulation are also presented. Common technical terms, design formulae, touch voltage, per-unit calculation and model examination questions with solutions are provided in the appendixes. About the Author Teo Cheng Yu received the B.Sc. in Electrical Eng. from National Taiwan University in 1971 and the M.Sc. in electrical machines and power systems from the University of London in 1974. He has worked in many areas of computer applications in power system since he joined the Imperial College, University of London as a research assistant from 1973 to 1974. Subsequently he was appointed engineer, executive engineer, senior engineer and project manager in the Public Utilities Board for 7 years. With the Nanyang Technological University for 24 years, he was appointed Head of Division of Power Engineering for 6 years. He was elected as the Chairman of the IEE Singapore Centre for 3 years and is Fellow of the IET, Fellow of IES and Fellow of IEM. He is the also author of three books in Pascal programming and the developer of a number of PC-based integrated simulators for the design, assessment and teaching of electrical system in buildings. He is currently the General Manager of Byte Power Consultants handling operational planning and simulation of a number of large HT and LV networks. ISBN 981-00-6041-6
  • 3. 2nd Edition in pdf Principles and Design of Low Voltage Systems Teo Cheng Yu B.Sc., M.Sc., DIC, CEng, PEng, FIEM, FIES, FIET General Manager Byte Power Consultants Byte Power Publications Singapore iii
  • 4. iv The author wishes to make this book free for all. This book may be reproduced in any form for all to read and study. ISBN 981-00-6041-6 First Print: January 1995 Revised Second Print: July 1995 Revised Third Print: January 1996 Second Edition First Print: July 1997 Second Edition Second Print: January 1999 Second Edition Third Print: July 2001 Second Edition Fourth Print October 2002 Second Edition Fifth Print August 2005 Revised Second Edition Sixth Print March 2009 Revised Second Edition Seven Print January 2012 Final pdf version July 2015 Published in Singapore by Byte Power Publications URL: http://www.byte-power.com E-Mail: cyteo@ntu.edu.sg iv
  • 5. To My Family Yeo Shai Ing Teo Ee Ee Teo Guan Siew v
  • 6. vi Preface to Second Edition In the undergraduate electrical engineering curriculum, much emphasis is placed on electronic, communication, control and computer engineering. Power engineering is also an essential field, which may be neglected in some universities. Besides the traditional topics such as three-phase circuit, magnetism, electromagnetic devices and DC machines, we introduce low voltage (LV) system including utility LV network, earthing arrangements and electrical installations from 15 kVA to 3000 kVA. Approximated by using a single-phase representation, the calculations of voltage drop, earth-fault and three-phase fault currents can be introduced. It is felt that a basic understanding of earthing is essential and the various earthing arrangements available in the LV system are good examples for the illustration of system earthing. The majority of electrical engineering graduates will possibly encounter more applications in the LV system rather than the traditional generating and transmission system. The integration of LV system at both the device and system levels into the undergraduate curriculum of electrical engineering is therefore, relevant and practical. In the second edition, Chapter 3 has been revised and the numerical expression for the degree of adequacy of the overcurrent and short- circuit protection are introduced. The concept of touch voltage and the requirements of electric shock protection for TT and TN-S system have also been revised in Chapter 4. For illustration, the assumptions made in all the examples are now clearly stated. The latest CP5, IEE wiring regulations and the relevant up-to-date IEC, BS and Singapore standards are referred. Common technical terms, design formulae, touch voltage, per unit calculation, tutorial questions and model examination questions with solutions are provided in the appendixes. Teo Cheng Yu January 2005 vi
  • 7. Preface A basic understanding of the earthing arrangements, in both the utility systems and consumer systems, and the principles and functions of low-voltage systems may be more relevant to the practising engineers. The majority of the electrical engineering graduates will possibly encounter more applications in the low-voltage systems. The integration of low- voltage systems into the undergraduate curriculum of electrical engineering is, therefore, timely. This book presents the principles and design of low-voltage systems at both the device and system levels and is written for both practising engineers and undergraduate students. Throughout the book, references are made to the latest international standards. Thus, the up-to-date system requirements, specifications and technical data are made available to help engineers/students in the study as well as hands-on design of various low-voltage systems. The latest code of practice and the IEE Wiring Regulations are discussed and illustrated through a series of comprehensive and interesting application examples. An overview to the utility supply systems and various key issues in the generation, transmission and distribution systems are given in Chapter 1. Characteristics, specifications and the relevant industrial standards for circuit breakers, cables and fuses are covered in Chapters 2, 3 and 5. In each chapter, the latest published IEC and BS standards are referred and application guidelines are included. Methods of system earthing, earthing arrangements in the transmission system and distribution system, and a detailed description of various earthing systems for electrical installations are provided in Chapter 4. Standard design procedures, estimation of design currents and the design of various types of circuits are presented in Chapter 6. Hands-on design exercises of a 400-kVA and 2000-kVA installations are demonstrated together with the supporting calculations that verify the compliance of the requirements of earth fault and overcurrent protections. Sources of fault currents, manual calculations and systematic calculations of the fault vii
  • 8. viii current and its distribution using microcomputers are given in Chapter 7 together with a practical case study. Application of the latest techniques of computer-aided design and simulation together with an attempt to automate the teaching and marking process using microcomputers are presented in Chapter 8. The author wishes to acknowledge Miss Alice Chua Mei Fong for putting in considerable effort in the typing and editing of this manuscript. The author would like to thank Dr Duggal B R and Dr Gooi H B for reading through this book and making their useful suggestions. Recognition is also given to Mr. Thomas Foo Mong Keow and Mr. Yeoh Tiow Koon for their effort in compiling the relevant materials and in preparing all the diagrams in this book. The author, in addition, thanks Mr Teo Heng Lam for his good suggestions on the system earthing in Chapter 4. Last but not least, the author thanks Professor Brian Lee for his good foresight in recognizing the significance of integrating electrical parts and the relevant standards into the engineering curriculum in 1981. This has provided the opportunity for the author to focus on the development and teaching of low-voltage systems since then. Teo C Y MacRitchie Reservoir / Yunnan Garden Singapore January 1995 viii
  • 9. ix Contents Preface vii 1 Introduction to Power Supply Systems 1 1.1 Electricity Supply Industry 1 1.2 Generation System 3 1.3 Transmission System 4 1.4 Distribution System 8 1.4.1 Schemes of Connection 9 1.4.2 Main and Backup Protections 12 1.5 Low-voltage Systems 13 1.5.1 Utility LV Networks 13 1.5.2 Consumer Installations 17 1.5.3 Scope of this Book 18 1.6 References 22 2 Circuit Breakers 23 2.1 Specification and Operation 23 2.2 Miniature Circuit-Breakers 29 2.3 Moulded Case Circuit-Breakers 33 2.4 Air Circuit-Breakers 37 2.5 Residual Current-operated Circuit-Breakers 39 2.6 Application Examples 44 2.7 References 49 3 Cable and Sizing of Conductors 50 3.1 Cable Construction 50 3.2 Cable Type and Selection 52 3.3 Current Rating of Cable 55 3.4 Voltage Drop Calculation 60
  • 10. x Contents 3.5 Protection against Overload 65 3.5.1 Required Conditions for Overload Protection 66 3.5.2 Small Overload and Cable Utilisation 68 3.5.3 Omission of Overload Protection 69 3.6 Protection against Short Circuit 71 3.6.1 Required Conditions for Protection 71 3.6.2 Adiabatic Equation 75 3.6.3 Formulae for Short-circuit Currents 77 3.7 References 79 4 Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 80 4.1 Earthing in a Utility System 80 4.2 Methods of System Earthing 82 4.3 Earthing in Low-voltage Systems 85 4.3.1 Installation Earthing 86 4.3.2 TT System 88 4.3.3 TN-S System 90 4.3.4 TN-C-S System 91 4.3.5 TN-C and IT Systems 91 4.4 Earth Fault Protection 92 4.4.1 Protection on TN System 92 4.4.2 Protection on TT System 95 4.5 Application Examples 96 4.6 References 103 5 Fuses 104 5.1 Characteristic of Fuses 105 5.1.1 Current Rating and Fusing Current 105 5.1.2 I2t and Cut-off Current 106 5.1.3 Time-current Zone 109 5.2 Miniature Fuses 111 5.3 Low-voltage Fuses 112
  • 11. Contents xi 5.4 Application Guides 115 5.4.1 Cable Protection 116 5.4.2 Motor Circuit 118 5.4.3 Electric Shock 120 5.4.5 Discrimination 121 5.4.6 Back-up for Circuit Breakers 122 5.5 References 124 6 Design Procedures and Examples 125 6.1 Design Currents 126 6.1.1 Design Currents in a Final DB 126 6.1.2 Design Currents in a Distribution DB 127 6.1.3 Procedure for Load Estimation 129 6.1.4 Standard Codes for Diversity 130 6.2 Design Procedures 131 6.2.1 Lighting Circuit 131 6.2.2 Socket-outlet Circuit 133 6.2.3 Motor Circuit 135 6.3 Example of a Two-storey Building 136 6.3.1 Final DB 137 6.3.2 Main Switchboard 141 6.3.3 Short-circuit Protection 142 6.4 Example of a Seven-storey Factory 144 6.4.1 Busbar 1 145 6.4.2 Busbar 2 146 6.4.3 Busbar 3 147 6.4.4 Short-circuit Protection 148 6.4.5 Earth Fault Protection 149 6.5 References 152 7 Calculations of Short Circuit Currents 153 7.1 Sources of Fault Currents 153 7.2 Step-by-step Calculations 154
  • 12. xii Contents 7.2.1 Common Base Values 155 7.2.2 Fault at Location F1 158 7.2.3 Fault at Location F2 159 7.3 Systematic Calculations by Computers 161 7.4 A Case Study 165 7.4.1 Method A 165 7.4.2 Method B 170 7.4.3 Accuracy and Comparison 171 8 Computer-aided Design and Simulation 173 8.1 Design Element Representation 173 8.2 Design Methods and Design Files 177 8.3 Assessment and Costing 178 8.4 Automatic Drafting 179 8.5 Simulation Test 181 8.6 Integrated Tools for Teaching 186 8.6.1 Automated Marking and Grading 187 8.6.2 Full Test and Partial Test 187 8.6.3 Implementation of MIPTEIN 188 8.7 References 189 Appendix A Common Technical Terms 190 Appendix B Formulae for Design Calculation 193 Appendix C Touch Voltage and Fault Current Calculation 195 Appendix D Per Unit Calculation 202 Appendix E Tutorial for IEE Short Course 205 Appendix F Solution to Tutorial E 211 Appendix G Model Examination Questions with Solution 217 Appendix H VipCoda 228 Appendix I VipTein 233 Index 237
  • 13. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO POWER SUPPLY SYSTEMS Electrical supply is always available whenever you turn on a switch. After the switch has been turned on, the supply is always continuous and unlikely to be interrupted. In an urban city, the supply of electricity is rather reliable and one may take it for granted that electrical supply is always available. However, behind the scene of the reliable supply, there are many utility’s managers, planners, engineers and technicians who are working around the clock utilising various supporting facilities and tools to enable the supply of electricity at a reliability of more than 99.99%. 1.1 ELECTRICITY SUPPLY INDUSTRY The lead-time to construct a power station is five years. However, to optimise the total capital investment and operating cost, it is required to have a generation expansion planning for up to fifteen years ahead to determine the type, size and timing of generating units. It is also required to have a transmission system expansion planning to determine the transmission voltage and transmission network to match the proposed generation expansion plan. After the generating facilities and the transmission network have been installed and commissioned, it is the task of the operation engineers to carry out operation planning at intervals of several hours, a day and a week ahead. The system control engineers, with the supporting supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) facilities, monitor and control around the clock the whole generation, transmission and distribution system. Together with the engineers and technicians in various power stations, the system control engineers have to ensure that not only the real time electrical demand has to be met, but it has to be met at a minimum production cost. A power flow diagram for a thermal power station is shown in Figure 1.1. The energy is converted from chemical to thermal form in the boiler; from thermal to mechanical in the turbine and then from mechanical to electrical in the generator. The voltage at the generator terminal is stepped up from 16 kV directly to 230 kV or 400 kV and the electrical power is transmitted through the 400/230-kV transmission network to various load centres. At each load centre, the voltage is stepped down and the electrical power is
  • 14. Chapter 12 distributed through the 22 kV distribution network to various high tension (HT) and low-voltage (LV) consumers. 22 kV LV LV LV 66 kV 400/230 kV Transmission Step-up Transformer GeneratorTurbineBoiler Fuel oil tank Chimney Condenser Network Load Centre Substation Figure 1.1 How electricity is brought to you Electrical power systems, in comparison with many other systems, are the most expensive in terms of capital investment and operating cost. They are also the most influential in terms of seriousness of disruption on our mode of life in case of breakdown. In the past, the cost of distribution system was estimated to be roughly equal to capital investment in the generation facilities, and together, they represented over 80% of the total system investment. In recent years, these figures have changed to 50% for generating plants, 30% for distribution systems and 20% for transmission systems. Thus, for every $100 invested in the electrical infrastructure, $50 will be used for the construction of power stations, $20 for the transmission network and the remaining $30 for the distribution network to provide electrical supply to each consumer. In addition, the annual operation and maintenance costs including the fuel cost are about 230% of the annual capital investment cost. In other words, for every one-dollar invested in the generation, transmission and distribution plants, the utility has to spend another two dollars and thirty cents to operate them [Ref. 1, P 3].
  • 15. Introduction to Power Systems 3 The annual capital expenditure for an utility having a maximum demand of 1500 MW can easily be 300 to 400 million dollars of which 50% or 200 million dollars is to cater for the investment of power plants. The complete commissioning of a 1610-MW oil-fired power station in three stages over six years will represent a capital investment of some 1100 million dollars. The commitment to the complete commissioning of the whole 1610-MW station would also imply the requirement of an annual fuel cost of some 400 million dollars for the full operation of the station. It is not only a decision of the huge capital investment but also a commitment to revenue expenditure for twenty to thirty years. After analyzing the characteristics of generating plants given in Table 1.1 and depending mainly on the expected load growth and the actual environmental constraints, the timing and the location of new power plant can be determined. The main objective of the system planner is to select the optimal plant type, size and timing such that the development and operation cost is minimized over the years under consideration and the annual load growth can be met reliably. Table 1.1 Characteristics of Generating Plants TYPE TYPICAL SIZE COST INDEX THERMAL EFFICIENCY (MW) Capital Cost kWh Cost (%) Oil-Fired 30-600 1.00 1.00 36-38 Coal-Fired 30-600 1.44 0.61 36-38 Nuclear 600-1000 1.78 0.16 31-32 Gas Turbine 20-110 0.56 1.36 27-28 Combined Cycle 90-300 0.85 0.88 41-48 Diesel Set 6-8 0.74 0.97 37-38 1.2 GENERATION SYSTEM Unlike other energy supply systems, electric energy cannot be stored economically on any large scale. It has to be generated and utilised at the same time. There is, at all times, a balance between supply and consumption of electric power. Owing to the inherent slow response of boilers in thermal power stations, the system control engineers have to anticipate in advance, the electrical demand for the next 24 hours and to commit the generating plants accordingly to meet the forecasted demand. As there are differences in thermal efficiency of different generators installed in the
  • 16. Chapter 14 system, some generators are capable of producing cheaper energy than others. Therefore, it is required to apportion the total demand among the generators in a manner that minimises fuel costs. It is the task of the system control engineers to decide when and which generating unit to run up or shut down and how much to load each unit. Recent advances in computer technology, mathematical modeling and optimisation techniques enable an optimal solution to be achieved through off-line computer programming or on-line real-time around-the-clock computer control. Figure 1.2 shows a demand curve which represents the total load required by all the consumers at each half-hourly interval for a typical weekday. The peak demand of 1040 MW occurs at 11:00 am and the minimum load of 538 MW at 4:00 am. There are altogether twelve available generators in four power stations. These generators are of different capacities and have different thermal efficiencies. As shown in Figure 1.2, the system control engineer has assigned three 250-MW generators running through 24 hours without shut-down and three 120-MW generators and one 60 MW generator to start-up and shut-down at different hours of the day. The envelop of the generating capacity is a step function which represents the maximum running capacity that the generating system can deliver at each time interval. The excess capacity in MW resulted from the difference between the maximum running capacity and the load demand is known as spinning reserve at different time of the day. The task of the control engineer is not only to minimise the generation cost, but also to ensure the continuity of supply. At the same time he has to satisfy all the operating constraints in the generating units and limitations of the transmission network under normal and some abnormal conditions. Figure 1.3 shows the system frequency response due to the sudden loss of two generators at 1100 hours. In this scenario, as the system has adequate spinning reserve, the system frequency can recover to above 49 Hz after the shedding of 6% of the system load at 49.2 Hz and another 8% at 48.7 Hz [Ref. 2]. The operating cost including the generator start-up cost for a typical weekday for two different sets of operating schedules are shown in Figure 1.4 [Ref 3]. 1.3 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM The ideal arrangement for supply of electricity is to have a power station located right at the load centre and generate power at the utilisation voltage. Transmission system can then be eliminated. However, it is
  • 17. Introduction to Power Systems 5 obviously not feasible to have a power station right in the city centre and also it is not technically feasible to generate power in a large scale at the utilisation voltage. An electrical system operated at 400 V can only supply up to a maximum demand of 3 to 4 MW. At a higher voltage of 22 kV, the maximum demand can be increased to 200 MW. For example, when the maximum demand in Singapore exceeded 192 MW in 1965, a higher voltage of 66 kV was implemented. Similarly when the maximum demand exceeded 781 MW in 1976, the transmission voltage was increased to 230 kV. The next higher voltage of 400 kV will be required to match the maximum demand of 5,000 MW in 1998. Higher transmission voltage has to be introduced mainly due to the increase in short-circuit current which exceeds the breaker’s breaking capacity. By operating at a higher voltage, the number of transmission circuits can also be minimized. There are also other technical and economic reasons in determining the appropriate voltage level. Maximum running Demand Figure 1.2 The engineer specifies unit commitment for Monday Transmission of electrical energy by high voltage circuits is required in order to bring bulk energy from a remote source to a load centre and at the same time to interconnect between power stations. The interconnection would increase the reliability of supply and would provide the spooling of
  • 18. Chapter 16 generating plants so that the standby capacity can be reduced. The most economic loading of generators can be achieved, and the overall production and transmission costs can be minimised. System Frequency (Hz) Time (Seconds) Figure 1.3 System frequency response with load shed Figure 1.4 Comparison of the daily operating costs
  • 19. Introduction to Power Systems 7 The total investment cost of a transmission system can also be substantial. An average annual investment of some 200 million dollars would be required for a typical 230-kV and 66-kV transmission network development [Ref. 4, P 54]. The comparison of capital costs to transmit firm capacities ranging from 750 MVA to 3000 MVA using transmission voltages at 230 kV and at 400 kV are given in Figure 1.5 [Ref. 5]. The essence of transmission network planning is to search for the least-cost expansion of transmission network within an acceptable reliability over a period of ten to twenty years. In general, the task of the actual planning involves choice of voltage levels; conductor types and sizes; voltage regulation and system fault vels; timing of new substations and substation sizes; network expansion onfiguration, and interconnection capacities. le c Figure 1.5 Comparison of transmission costs for different voltage levels In the day-to-day operation, the engineer has to monitor and control the active and reactive power flows. The transmission voltage has to be regulated by switching on/switching off reactors at different times of the day. He also needs to ensure that all the generators are operating within their active and reactive capability limits. A load flow simulation at 1030 hours for a model 230-kV transmission network is shown in Figure 1.6. In this network, the engineer has to resolve three overloading circuits (one 230kV, 30km 400kV, 30km 5 4.0 400kV, 15km 230kV, 15km3.0 400kV, 5km 1.0 2.0 230kV, 5km 750 1500 3000 0.5 .0 Per Unit Cost Firm Capacity (MVA)
  • 20. Chapter 18 circuit from SNK to UJR and two other circuits from PSR to JUR) and a reactive limit violation at power station SNK. During fault conditions, the ngineer has to identify the types of fault, isolate fault and restore supplye to as many areas as possible within the shortest possible time [Ref. 6]. Figure 1.6 Load flow simulation at 1030 hours 1.4 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM The main function of a distribution system is to receive electric power from large, bulk power sources and to distribute electric power to consumers at various voltage levels with acceptable degrees of reliability. The most commonly used nominal voltages are 3.3 kV, 6.6 kV, 11 kV, 22 kV and 33 kV. Depending on the load density and the annual growth rate in a service area, the tendency is toward higher distribution voltage especially for urban areas which have an increasing consumption of electrical energy. By selecting a higher distribution voltage, appreciable savings in overall cost can be achieved if the load density within the service area is high. In Singapore, the primary distribution voltages adopted are 22 kV and 6.6 kV, and the secondary distribution voltage at utilisation level is 400 V. In the city centre or industrial estate, where the load density is high, it is distributed at 22 kV and stepped down directly to the utilisation voltage through 22/0.4 kV transformers. In areas where the load density is low, it
  • 21. Introduction to Power Systems 9 is distributed at 6.6 kV and stepped down through 6.6/0.4 kV transformers. Part of a typical distribution network consisting of 22 kV/LV, and 6.6 kV/LV or 6.6-kV/LV transformer is 1 MVA. The tandard cable sizes are 10 MVA and 15 MVA for 22-kV circuits and 5.5 y of service required in he load area. The system should be flexible to allow expansion in small g load conditions. kV/LV is shown in Figure 1.7. LV refers to the low-voltage system of 400 V. A standard 66/22-kV intake substation has two to three incoming 66 kV circuits preferably to be fed from two separate sources. Depending on the size of the service area and the maximum estimated load in the area, the installed capacity of each intake substation in Singapore is either 150 MVA consisting of two 75-MVA 66/22-kV transformers, or 62.5 MVA consisting of two 31.25-MVA 66/22-kV transformers. Normally, each intake substation is built with a spare capacity for the third transformer to be installed when required. The standard size of the 22/6.6-kV transformer is 10 MVA and the 22- s MVA for 6.6-kV circuit. The distribution system should provide service with a minimum voltage variation and a minimum supply interruption. The overall system cost including construction, operation and maintenance of the system should be as low as possible and be consistent with the qualit t increments so as to meet changin 1.4.1 Schemes of Connection The schemes of connection in a distribution network normally consist of radial, ring and network systems. In a radial circuit arrangement, an outgoing main feeder commences from the intake substation and feeds directly into the area in a multi-drop configuration as shown in Figure 1.8. The current magnitude is the greatest from substation A to B and then it gradually reduces along the cable route until it reaches its minimum loading level from substation E to substation F. As there is no duplication of equipment, it has the lowest capital cost as compared with other schemes of connection. However, the reliability of service continuity in a radial system is low. A cable fault occurring between substations A and B will result in the total supply failure from substations B to F, and the supply can be restored only after the cable from substations A to B has been repaired.
  • 22. Chapter 110 In take S u b statio n 2 2 kV 2 2 kV 2 2 kV 2 2 kV 6 6 kV L V 1 M V A 1 0 M V A 7 5 M V A7 5 M V A 6 .6 kV 6 .6 kV 6 .6 kV 2 2 kV 2 2 kV L V 1 M V A L V 1 M V A L V 1 M V A LV 1 M V A LV 1 M V A L V 1 M V A Figure 1.7 Part of a typical distribution network Figure 1.8 Radial circuit arrangement To provide a better continuity of supply and to reduce the time taken in restoration of supply, the connection in the 22-kV network is normally arranged in a ring configuration as shown in Figure 1.9. The ring circuit commences from the intake substation, makes a loop through the area to be served and returns to the intake substation. There are normally five ring circuits from one intake substation and in each ring circuit, there are typically five 22/0.4-kV substations. 22 KV B A C D E F LVLVLVLVLV
  • 23. Introduction to Power Systems 11 For illustration purposes, as shown in Figure 1.9, there are only two ring circuits. In each ring circuit, it provides a two-way feed to each 22/0.4 kV substation and therefore, at any one time, the tripping of any one circuit will not interrupt any supply in the whole ring. However, in order to enable the continuity of service, the cable size in each section of the ring should have adequate capacity to carry all the entire load in one ring. In other words, under normal conditions where there is no circuit out of service, all the circuits in a ring will be loaded to only 50%. To enhance the reliability supply and to cater for the loss of the intake substation, each ring circuit can also have a stand-by alternative feed from a separate source as shown in Figure 1.9. A 22-kV ring circuit arrangement integrating two separate 66/22-kV sources is shown in Figure 1.10 [Ref. 7]. A standby circuit which has one end at normally open position linking two ring circuits from separate sources such as the circuit between substations ‘a’ and ‘aa’ or substations ‘g’ and ‘rr’ is known as an interconnector network cut. This standby network can be closed to restore supply during the failure of one 66/22-kV source. A model 22/6.6-kV cable distribution network with two 31.25-MVA, 66/22- kV incoming transformers extracted from part of an urban utility system is shown in Figure 1.11. [Ref. 8] The loading in each circuit is given in MVA and at each substation, there are two 22/0.4-kV transformers or two 6.6/0.4- kV transformers which are not shown in the diagram. LV 22 K V 22KV LV 22KV22KV to other source 22KV 22KV 22KV 22KV22KV 22KV 22KV22KV LV LV LV LV LV LV LV LV LV to other source Figure 1.9 A typical ring circuit arrangement
  • 24. Chapter 112 1.4.2 Main and Backup Protections The reliability of modern power distribution system has been increased by operating the network in a ring configuration and by interconnecting two or more sources. The incoming transformer, busbar at each intake substation, or each feeder in the network is normally provided with a main protection (also known as unit protection) and a backup protection on overcurrent and earth fault. The zones of each unit protection are shown in Figure 1.12. Once a fault is detected in the protective zone, all the breakers in the respective zone will be opened to isolate the fault. However, at times, supply interruption is still unavoidable mainly due to fault or overloading in the distribution network. If the fault can be detected and cleared by the unit protection, the fault is usually confirmed to be within the zone of the unit protection. Unfortunately, unit protection may not operate correctly or may not be installed for every zone in the distribution network. In this case, the clearing of the fault will have to depend on the backup overcurrent and earth fault protection. In an interconnected network, it is always a difficult task to grade the overcurrent/earth fault protection to satisfy fault discrimination at every location. Thus, there may be more breakers tripped than necessary to clear a fault and that the fault location may be difficult to determine. In these situations, the operation engineer has to rely on his knowledge of the distribution system, logical thinking and judgment to diagnose the type of faults and its location. k jn m l op r q e f hi c b d a gg ff ee dd hh jj kk ll mm nn oo ppqq rr ss tt cc bb g aa ii INC INC INC 66/22 kV Source A 66/22 kV Source B To other 66/22 kV S/S To other 66/22 kV S/S To other 66/22 kV S/S Figure 1.10 Ring circuits integrating two 66/22 kV sources INC Interconnector Network cut 66/22 kV Incoming 22 kV/LV Substation
  • 25. Introduction to Power Systems 13 1.5 LOW-VOLTAGE SYSTEM A low-voltage (LV) system refers to distribution voltages below 1000 V. Typical nominal voltages in this range are 240, 380, 400, 415, 440, 480, 550 and 600 V. In Singapore, a LV system refers to the three-phase four-wire system of 400 V between line-to-line, and 230 V between each line to neutral. LV is not only the distribution supply voltage, it is also the utilisation voltage of most of the electrical appliances. Consumers whose incoming supply is 22 kV or 6.6 kV will have to design and install their own HT and LV systems [Ref. 9]. For consumers taking LV supply from the utility, the LV system prior to incoming supply will be managed by the utility and these consumers have to design and install only their own internal LV network. Thus, both the utility and the consumers have to be involved in the design, installation and maintenance of the LV systems. Although individual LV construction schemes are small, the large number of such jobs carried out each year tends to absorb high capital and design resources in the industrial and commercial LV systems. Figure 1.11 A model 22/6.6 kV distribution network 1.5.1 Utility LV Networks The method of connection from the utility’s LV network to each LV consumer depends mainly on the types of the existing network, load density and local utility’s regulations. The practices adopted by one utility may not necessarily be the most economical under different circumstances for
  • 26. Chapter 114 another utility. In Singapore, depending upon consumer’s load requirements, electricity supply will be provided according to Table 1.2 [Ref. 9, P 9]. To other 66/22 KV source Busbar protection zone Cable protection zone Cable protection zone Transformer protection zone 22 KV 66 KV LV LV LV LV LV LV Figure 1.12 Zones of Unit Protection Table 1.2 Types of Electricity Supply Maximum capacity Voltage Circuit Arrangement (kVA) (V) (phase) (wire) 23 230 1 2 2,000 400 3 4 30,000 22,000 3 3 >30,000 66,000 3 3
  • 27. Introduction to Power Systems 15 For consumers taking supply at 22 kV or 66 kV, service connection will be fed directly from the utility’s distribution network at the appropriate voltage levels. For consumers taking supply at 400 V at 1000 kVA, the supply will be fed directly either through a 22/0.4-kV or 6.6/0.4-kV transformer as shown in Figure 1.13. Most of the consumers taking LV supply less than 1,000 kVA will be fed through the utility’s LV network. A typical 1,000-kVA LV board with six outgoing circuits is shown in Figure 1.14. Each outgoing circuit is a 4-core 300 mm2 copper conductor XLPE cable protected by a 500-A fuse feeding a number of overground (OG) boxes in a radial configuration. Each OG box has five feeder units, consisting of one incoming feeder from the LV board, another feeder connecting to the next OG box and three service feeders each connected directly to one consumer or a group of consumers as shown in Figure 1.15. 400 V ACB utility consumer metering link 1 MVA 22 KV 7x500mm2 /Cu/1C/XLPE Figure 1.13 LV supply fed directly from transformers The scheme of connection in the LV network is normally arranged in a ring configuration. However, each ring circuit is operated radially through an open link commonly known as network cut, as shown in Figure 1.16. Each network cut can be closed to provide an alternative feed to each radially operated ring circuit to facilitate cable outage due to fault or for maintenance. As shown in Figure 1.16, there are two additional network cuts known as LV interconnectors linking two LV substations. If one of the 22- kV/LV transformer fails, these LV interconnectors can be closed so that supply originally fed by the faulted transformer can be partially restored by utilising the spare capacity from the other 22-kV/LV transformer.
  • 28. Chapter 116 OG 1 500A BS88 4 x 300 mm2 4C/Cu/XLPE 22 kV or 6.6 kV link 1 MVA 400V OG 2 500A BS88 4 x 300 mm2 4C/Cu/XLPE OG 3 500A BS88 4 x 300 mm2 4C/Cu/XLPE OG 4 500A BS88 4 x 300 mm2 4C/Cu/XLPE OG 5 500A BS88 4 x 300 mm2 4C/Cu/XLPE OG 6 500A BS88 4 x 300 mm2 4C/Cu/XLPE Figure 1.14 A typical LV board Zhang San link 200A BS88 BS88 200A link BS88 4 x 300 mm2 4C/Cu/XLPE 4 x 35 mm2 4C/Cu/XLPE 4 x 35 mm2 4C/Cu/XLPE 4 x 300 mm2 4C/Cu/XLPE From LV board 3 circuits, Lee Si, A, B, C 2 x 35 mm2 2C/Cu/XLPE Ah Meng To next OG box Figure 1.15 A typical OG box
  • 29. Introduction to Power Systems 17 22 KV22 KV LV Network CutOG Box LVLV Figure 1.16 Radially operated LV network 1.5.2 Consumer Installations The installation earthing and the LV system should be so arranged such that on the occurrence of a fault on any appliance, the voltage of any conductive part likely to be touched by an individual should not reach a dangerous level. In addition, every circuit should be protected adequately against overload and short-circuit currents. Many accidents and injuries that occur in electrical installations are due to insufficient knowledge of the electrical personnel in wiring system. Knowledge and appreciation of the implications of the wiring regulations or code of practice [Ref. 10], coupled with the rationale and principles covering the LV system will ensure that requirements for the safety of persons and property are met, and the LV system is designed and operated properly at minimum cost. The LV system covers the design of the whole range of consumer installations from as low as 15 kVA to 2000 kVA for domestic, industrial and commercial buildings. A simple LV installation of a 300 kVA, 2-level shop-house is shown in Figure 1.17 and its tenant distribution boards in Figure 1.18. The LV installation of a 2,000-kVA, 8-level hotel building is shown in Figure 1.19. Due to voltage drop and economic reasons, for every
  • 30. Chapter 118 high-rise commercial building over 24 levels, the electrical installation is normally implemented using an HV/LV system. For example, the electrical supply of a 72-level commercial building distributed by a combination of 22 kV and LV systems is shown in Figure 1.20. There are two 15-MVA, 22-kV feeders feeding directly from the utility’s 22-kV distribution system to the consumer’s intake 22-kV substation which is located at basement level B3. The other 22-kV substation is located at level L22 and it is fed from the intake 22-kV substation B3 using two 15-MVA 22-kV circuits. The supply at utilisation voltage is obtained from 22/0.4-kV transformers located at various strategic levels such as level B2, level L9, level L35 and level L61 as shown in Figure 1.20. All the 22/0.4 kV transformers are fed directly from the two 22-kV substations at B3 or L22 using the transformer/feeder circuit arrangement and there is no 22-kV switchgear at various strategic floors. The LV supply will then be fed from the various strategic floors upwards or downwards to individual levels using busways or feeder risers. 1.5.3 Scope of This Book This book covers the principles and designs related to LV systems in buildings. At the device level, it covers the principles, characteristics, specifications and the relevant industrial standards of cables and various types of protective devices such as miniature circuit-breakers, moulded- case circuit-breakers, air-circuit-breakers, residual current operated circuit-breakers and fuses. Code of practice and application guides for the selection of various types of devices, the design of various circuits and the sizing of conductors are also introduced. At the system level, the source earthing system and the consumer earthing system are explained and reasoned with reference to the IEE wiring regulations and the relevant code of practice for earthing. Earth fault protection and protection for electric shock are illustrated with application examples. Sources of fault current and the approach and formulae for the calculation of various types of short-circuit currents which may occur in the LV system are given and described in details using practical examples. Step-by-step design procedures and examples are provided and the applications of computer-aided design to eliminate the routine and repetitive design works are introduced. The suggested approach of the computer simulation tests under a series of loading conditions enables the designers to visualise the performance of the LV
  • 31. Introduction to Power Systems 19 system designed by them and to experience any consequences due to the design errors. T1MCCB 100A MCCB 63A Level 2 Tenant DBs MCCB 160A MCCB 160A Main Switch Board MCCB 200A T1 MCCB 63A T1MCCB 100A MCCB 63A Level 1 Tenant DBs T1 MCCB 63A water pump sprinkler pump cu 60x6.3 mm 2 MCCB 400A Figure 1.17 Single-line diagram for a 2-level shophouse Figure 1.18 Tenant distribution board T1
  • 32. Chapter 120 M M M M M M M M M M M G Fire Pump Figure 1.19 LV supply of an 8-level hotel building
  • 33. Introduction to Power Systems 21 G G G G L61 L35 L9 T6 T8 LV LV LV LV T7 T5 T4 B2 T2T1 B3 L22 22 KV 22 KV 15 MVA 15 MVA Figure 1.20 22 kV/LV supply of a 72-level building
  • 34. Chapter 122 1.6 REFERENCES [1] Turan Gonen, “Electric Power Distribution System Engineering”, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1986. [2] Teo C Y, Gooi H B, “A Microcomputer-based Integrated Generation and Transmission System Simulator”, IEEE Transactions on Power System, Vol. 10, No.1, PP 44-50, 1995. [3] Teo C Y, Gooi H B, Chan T W, “An Innovative PC based Simulator for Power System Studies”, Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 38, No. 1, PP 33-42, 1996. [4] “Public Utilities Board Annual Report 1993”, PUB, March 1994. [5] Teo C Y, Lee Y O, “Determination of Transmission Voltage for a 8 GW System in an Island”, paper presented at the CIGRE Regional Meeting, Sydney, November 1987. [6] Teo C Y, “Conventional and Knowledge based Approach in Fault Diagnosis and Supply Restoration for Power Network”, IEEE Transaction on Power Systems”, Vol. 13, No. 1, PP 8-14, 1998. [7] Ong Kok Cheng, “Evolution of 22 kV Network Design and Operation Concept to Enhance Reliability of Electricity Supply”, PUB Digest, May 1991. [8] Teo C Y, Gooi H B, “Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosis and Supply Restoration for a Distribution Network”, IEE Proceedings on Generation, Transmission and Distribution Network”, Vol. 145, No. 4, PP 444-450, 1998. [9] “Handbook on Applications for Electricity Supply”, Power Supply Ltd, Singapore, 1996. [10] CP 5 : 1998, “Code of Practice for Electrical Installations”, Singapore Productivity and Standards Board, 1998
  • 35. ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ CHAPTER 2 CIRCUIT BREAKERS To provide adequate overcurrent protection, each circuit should be equipped with a circuit breaker for automatic interruption of supply in the event of overload current and fault current. The circuit breaker installed in a circuit should break any fault current flowing in the circuit before such current causes danger due to thermal or mechanical effects produced in the circuit or the associated connections. The breaker shall satisfy the condition that the breaking capacity should be greater than or equal to the prospective short-circuit current or earth fault current at the point where the breaker is installed. A circuit breaker is a mechanical switching device which should fulfil the following specifications . It should be capable of being safely closed in on any load current or short-circuit current within the making capacity of the device. It should safely open any current that may flow through it up to the breaking capacity of the device. It should automatically interrupt the flow of abnormal currents up to the breaking capacity of the device. It should be able to carry continuously any current up to the rated current of the device. 2.1 SPECIFICATION AND OPERATION The rated current (IN) of a circuit breaker is the current that it can carry continuously, generally for a duration of more than eight hours. The rated current must not cause a temperature rise in excess of the specified values when the ambient temperature is between –50 C to 400 C. Different temperature rise limits are specified for different parts of a circuit breaker. A circuit breaker will not operate (trip) if the current passing through it is 105% to 113% of its rated current [Ref. 1, P 23], [Ref. 2, P 27]. It will take one to two hours to trip if the current passing through it is 130% to 145% of the rated current [Ref. 1, P 23, Ref. 2, P 27]. Breaking Capacity The breaking capacity of a circuit breaker is the maximum current (in r.m.s.) that flows through the breaker and the breaker is capable to interrupt at the instant of initiation of the arc during a breaking operation
  • 36. 24 Chapter 2 at a stated voltage under prescribed conditions. The breaking capacity is usually expressed in kA or MVA. Typical values range from 3 kA to 43 kA. Making Capacity The making capacity of a circuit breaker is the maximum current that will flow through the breaker and the breaker is capable of withstanding at the instance during a closing operation at a stated voltage under prescribed conditions. Typical values range from 1.4 to 2.2 times the r.m.s. value of the breaking capacity. Load current Trip lever Bi-metal element Figure 2.1 Principle of tripping by a bi-metal Tripping Mechanisms To provide overload and short circuit protection, most circuit breakers have a bi-metallic overload trip and an electromagnetic trip. The overload trip is a thermal trip which works with a bi-metal. The bi-metal consists of two metal strips of different temperature coefficients of expansion which are rolled one on the other. The bi-metal is deflected when heated by the current flowing through it. Figure 2.1 shows a schematic drawing of this operation. The deflection of the bi-metal depends on the current magnitude and its duration. After a pre-determined deflection, which means after a certain time depending on the current magnitude, it will activate the tripping mechanism. The deflecting bi-metal directly opens the contacts or gives a signal to the switching mechanism to open the contacts. The characteristic of the thermal trip can be widely influenced by the design of the material and the shape of the bi-metal. The bi-metal can be directly heated by the load current flowing through it or it can be heated indirectly by a heater winding. The time-current characteristic of the thermal trip is illustrated in Figure 2.2.
  • 37. Circuit Breakers 25 Figure 2.2 Time-current characteristic of a thermal trip 10,000 Time (seconds) 1,000 100 10 1 0.01 0.1 1001 10 Multiple of rated current Spring Coil Fixed iron core Load current Hammer trip Fixed contact Moving Contact Movable armature Trip lever Figure 2.3 Principle of tripping by an electromagnetic device As shown in Figure 2.3, the electromagnetic trip consists essentially of a coil through which the load current flows. Inside this coil, there is a fixed iron core with a movable armature. If the current exceeds a pre-specified limit, the armature will be attracted against the force of the spring. The
  • 38. 26 Chapter 2 switching mechanism is actuated by the lever on the right hand side and provides the opening of the breaker contacts. Furthermore, on the left side, a hook which is provided for the direct opening of the contacts will accelerate the speed of operation. Figure 2.4 shows the time-current characteristic of the electromagnetic trip. With lower overload currents, only the thermal trip is active. For higher current, as shown in Figure 2.4, the electromagnetic trip operates at a current which is equal to 4 times the rated current. In this sample curve, the breaker must not trip for a currrent less than 4 times the rated current, and it must trip for a current equal to or greater than this value. The tripping time is about 0.05 s. For higher current, the operating time is shorter and is between 0.05 s to 0.01 s. Multiple of rated current Time (seconds) 0.1 1 10 100 1,000 10,000 0.01 1 10 100 Figure 2.4 Time-current characteristic of an electromagnetic trip The manufacturer of a circuit breaker can modify the characteristic of the bi-metal tripping curve and can also decide the magnitude of the current for the electromagnetic trip. Figure 2.5 shows the combined curve of two tripping devices whose characteristics are shown in Figure 2.2 and from Figure 2.4.
  • 39. Circuit Breakers 27 Multiple of rated current 10010 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1,000 10,000 Time (seconds) 1 Figure 2.5 Time current characteristic of the combined tripping Principle of Arc Extinction The contact system comprises separate main and arcing contacts as shown in Figure 2.6. The arcing contacts are fitted with arc runners to assist the upward movement of the arc into the arc chute. The arc, initiated across the arcing contacts, is forced upwards by the electromagnetic forces and by the thermal action. The roots of the arc travel rapidly along the arc chute. Here, its length is rapidly and considerably extended by the splitter plates in the arc chutes. The arc is thus extinguished by lengthening, cooling and splitting. To interrupt short-circuit current, two different methods of breaking are used, namely the zero point extinguishing system and the current limiting system. The zero point extinguishing system can only be used in a.c. systems and the current-limiting system can be used for both d.c. and a.c. systems. Figure 2.7 shows the difference between the two systems by comparing the arc voltage and the effective short-circuit current.
  • 40. 28 Chapter 2 Splitter Plates Arc Chute Arc Runner Arc Arc Contacts Load Current Flexible conductor across hinge Load Current Figure 2.6 Principle of arc extinction Industrial Standards Circuit-breaker standards are numerous as most countries have their own national standards for each type of circuit-breakers. However, progress in the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) has led to the agreed IEC Standards to be the base of their own national standards. The most generally applicable IEC standard for low voltage circuit-breakers is IEC 947-2 : 1992 [Ref. 3]. The current British Standard (BS) has integrated with the European Standards (EN) and is now abbreviated as BS EN. The latest British standard for low-voltage circuit breakers is BS EN 60947-2 : 1992 [Ref. 1]. In Singapore, Singapore Standards (SS) are referred along with IEC Standards and British Standards. Low voltage circuit-breaker standards in the United States of America are in general not equivalent to IEC specifications, and their ratings and test criteria are not directly comparable. The relevant standards are issued by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Underwriters Labs (UL) and the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA).
  • 41. Circuit Breakers 29 V A TL TV IK ID IN IK INia ID UN ULUL Ttot ia TV TL Ttot UN Zero point extinguisherCurrent limiter UN = rated voltage UL = arc voltage IK = prospective short-circuit current ID = short-circuit current limited by the miniature circuit breaker IN = rated current TV = pre-arcing mechanical operating time TL = arcing time Ttot = total time required for interrupting a short circuit (break time) ia = tripping current Figure 2.7 Comparison of two methods of breaking 2.2 MINIATURE CIRCUIT-BREAKERS The miniature circuit-breakers (MCB) are used extensively for the protection of final circuits in domestic and commercial installations. They offer these circuits better protection, particularly when overload conditions are being considered than the fuse alternatives. Most MCBs are provided with two types of tripping mechanisms, namely the bi-metallic thermal trip and the electromagnetic trip. With the electromagnetic type of tripping, the switch can be closed again immediately after it has tripped. Obviously, it may trip again if the cause is still there. With the thermal trip, the switch cannot be closed again for a minute or two as the heater element and the bi-metallic strip have to cool down first. MCBs are available for both single-phase and three-phase circuits. In a single-phase circuit, a single-pole MCB may be used in the live conductor or a two-pole MCB connected in the live and neutral conductors. Three or
  • 42. 30 Chapter 2 four-pole MCBs are used for protection in three-phase supplies. If a fault current flows through even one pole of an MCB, all the three poles will be operated. This prevents single phasing, which may result in damage to 3- phase motors. A cross-sectional view of a typical single-phase MCB is shown in Figure 2.8. Figure 2.8 Cross-sectional view of a MCB Load Arc splitter pack Load current Plunger Solenoid Bimetal strip The main standard for MCBs is BS 3871 : Part 1 [Ref. 4]. This standard covers MCB ratings up to 100 A, breaking capacities up to 9 kA and voltage ratings up to 415 V. This standard, however, has been withdrawn from 1 July 1994 and is superseded by BS EN 60898 : 1991 [Ref. 2] which is similar to IEC 898 : 1995 and SS 359 : 1996 [Ref. 10]. The BS EN 60898 covers MCBs having a rated voltage not exceeding 440 V, a rated current not exceeding 125 A and a rated short-circuit capacity not exceeding 25 kA. These circuit-breakers are used for protection in electrical installation in buildings and similar applications. They are designed for use by uninstructed people and to be maintenance free.
  • 43. Circuit Breakers 31 Rated Voltage Based on BS EN 60898 [Ref. 2], the preferred values of rated voltages are 400 V/230 V. Values of 380 V/220 V and 415 V / 240 V should progressively be superseded by the values of 400 V / 230 V. Current Rating The preferred values of rated current are : 6, 8, 10, 15, 16, 20, 25, 32, 40, 50, 63, 80 100 and 125 A. Short-circuit Capacity Instead of specifying the breaking capacity, the standard specifies the values of the short-circuit capacity. The short-circuit capacity refers to the prospective current expressed by its r.m.s. value which the MCB is designed to make (close), to carry for its opening time and to break under the specified conditions. The standard values of rated short-circuit capacity are 1.5, 3, 4.5, 6 and 10 kA. For values above 10 kA, up to and including 25 kA, the preferred value is 20 kA. Instantaneous Tripping Based on the standard range of instantaneous tripping, MCBs are classified into three types given in Table 2.1. In BS3871, they are classified as type 1 (2.7 IN to 4 IN ), type 2 (4 IN to 7 IN ) and type 3 (7 IN to 10 IN ). Another older European standard classified them as type L, G and U. Type L is similar to type 1 and types G and U are similar to type 2. In BS 3871:1984, it specifies a category of duty, namely M1 (1 kA), M3 (3 kA), M6 (6 kA) and M9 (9 kA). Table 2.1 Range of Instantaneous Tripping Type Instantaneous Tripping Current B Above 3 IN up to and including 5 IN C Above 5 IN up to and including 10 IN D Above 10 IN up to and including 50 IN Time-current Characteristics An MCB shall have a fixed and un-adjustable time/current characteristic calibrated at 300C given in Table 2.2. Typical time-current characteristics of type C MCBs from 5 A to 100 A are shown in Figure 2.9. These characteristic curves are identical to type C MCBs. By referring to the curve of the 100 A and by transferring the Y-axis from amperes to the multiples of the rated current of the MCB, the generalised time-current
  • 44. 32 Chapter 2 characteristic curves are shown in Figure 2.10 incorporating type 1, type B, type C and type 3. Time (seconds) Compiled with BS EN 60898 Type C or BS 3871 Type 3 Current (Amperes) 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1,000 10,000 Figure 2.9 Typical time-current characteristic for type C MCB Table 2.2 Time-current Characteristics of MCB by BS EN 60898 Test Type Test Current Initial Condition Test Period Result 1 B, C, D 1.13 IN Cold* t > 1 h (for IN < 63 A) t > 2 h (for IN > 63 A) No tripping 2 B, C, D 1.45 IN Right after Test 1 t < 1 h (for IN < 63 A) t < 2 h (for IN > 63 A) Tripping 3 B, C, D 2.55 IN Cold * 1 s < t < 60 s (IN < 32 A) 1 s < t < 120 s (IN > 32 A) Tripping 4 B 3 IN C 5 IN Cold * D 10 IN t > 0.1 s (i.e. Instantaneous tripping does not occur) No tripping 5 B 5 IN C 10 IN Cold * D 50 IN t < 0.1 s (i.e. Instantaneous tripping occurs) Tripping * Cold means without previous loading and at 300C.
  • 45. Circuit Breakers 33 1,000 100 10 1 0.01 0.1 1 10 Multiple of rated current 10,000 Time (seconds) Type 3 and Type C Type B Type 1 100 Figure 2.10 Generalised time-current characteristics for MCB 2.3 MOULDED CASE CIRCUIT-BREAKERS Moulded case circuit-breakers (MCCB) are required for installations which have higher fault level or higher current ratings exceeding 125 A. This circuit-breaker is defined as an air-break circuit-breaker, designed to have no provision for maintenance, having a supporting and enclosing housing of mould insulating material, forming an integral part of the circuit-breaker. Improvements in material science and better understanding of factors influencing the performance of MCCBs have led to the production of very compact MCCBs. It has basically three main elements, namely, the tripping unit, the switching unit and a current interrupting unit. The switching unit is normally held at ‘on’ position by a latching device. Tripping this latch activates the spring which opens the breakers. It has a built-in thermal tripping and an electromagnetic tripping. The thermal element which senses the overload current has inverse time characteristic. The electromagnetic tripping gives instantaneous operation on high fault currents. The sensors operate the tripping mechanism and release the latch. MCCBs have several advantages over ordinary switches and fuses in the control and protection of circuits and apparatus. They have a repeatable non-destructive performance and are safe in operation under fault conditions. In the case of the triple-pole MCCB, it has built-in mechanism to
  • 46. 34 Chapter 2 simultaneously open all three phases for a single-phase fault. All breakers have, as a standard feature, the ability to disconnect automatically under overload conditions, via bi-metallic thermal tripping in each pole. An essential feature of all MCCBs is the quick make-and-break operation known as ‘trip-free’ operation which is independent of the action of the operating personnel. This feature is particularly important, when the operator closes a circuit on fault. These circuit-breakers are mainly used to protect main feeder cables for incoming supply to sub-circuits/distribution boards and for large motor circuits. For installation, MCCBs are suitable as free-standing units, or for building into compact cubic-type switchboards. Auxiliary items such as shunt trip elements, status switches, interlocks and motor-operated mechanism for remote operation can all be integrated into the MCCB. The usual current ratings are from 15 A to 1500 A at voltages up to 600 V. The breaking capacity ranges from 10 kA to 65 kA. The built-in thermal tripping and electromagnetic tripping can also be adjusted separately within a given range after installation. An installed 400-A MCCB is shown in Figure 2.11a. The internal construction and the dismantled parts of a 300 A MCCB are shown in Figure 2.11b. Part of a typical switchboard integrating a number of MCCBs is shown in Figure 2.12. Fig 2.11a An Installed 400-A MCCB
  • 47. Circuit Breakers 35 Fig 2.11b A 300-A MCCB with cover removed MCCB Standards The main industrial standards for MCCBs are BS EN 60947-1 [Ref. 5] and BS EN 60947-2 [Ref. 1]. These two standards define the characteristics, conditions for operation, methods for testing and the requirements for circuit breakers with rated voltages up to and including 1000 V a.c. or 1500 d.c. These two standards were derived from IEC 947-1 and IEC 947-2 [Ref. 3]. The older standard BS 4752 was superseded by BS EN 60947. Under BS EN 60947, there is no specification on the preferred voltage or preferred current. However, the characteristic of the over-current opening release is specified as follows at a reference temperature of 300C + 20C. (a) At 1.05 times the current setting for 2 hours, tripping shall not occur. (b) At the end of the 2 hours, the value of current is immediately raised to 1.3 times the current setting, and tripping shall then occur in less than 2 hours. For breakers less than 63 A, the duration of 2 hours should be reduced to 1 hour.
  • 48. 36 Chapter 2 As there are no other standard values specified in BS EN 60497, the followings are some typical technical data for reference. Current rating : 10, 16, 20, 32, 40, 50, 63, 80, 100 200, 300, 400, 630, 800, 1250 A Rated voltage : 380, 400, 415 V Rated breaking capacity : 10, 20, 25, 35, 65, 85 kA (r.m.s.) Rated making capacity : 17, 44, 53, 63, 84, 143 kA (peak) Figure 2.12 Part of a switchboard integrated with three MCCBs The time-current characteristic of a typical MCCB is shown in Figure 2.13 indicating the range of adjustments for both the thermal tripping and electromagnetic tripping. Range ‘a’ refers to an ambient temperature of
  • 49. Circuit Breakers 37 200C and range ‘b’ refers to 400C. Range ‘c’ refers to the magnetic release at 5 IN and range ‘d’ refers to 10 IN. The design engineer has to specify either range ‘c’ or ‘d’ when ordering. Figure 2.13 Time-current characteristic of a typical MCCB 2.4 AIR CIRCUIT-BREAKERS One of the oldest forms of automatic protective device is the air circuit- breaker (ACB). It consists of an operating mechanism, main contacts, arcing contacts, arc chute and a built-in overcurrent tripping device. The name ACB is normally applied to large breakers that do not fall into the category of MCB or MCCB, although both MCB and MCCB are also air-break circuit-breakers. The ACBs are characterised by their sturdy construction, ample electrical clearances, availability in high-current-carrying, interrupting and making ratings. The tripping devices are adjustable to 20 o C 40 o C 1.5 0.1 0.01 1.05 2 5 10 Multiple of rated current 6 6 6 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 10 2 hr 1 hr 100 1,000Time (seconds) a b c d
  • 50. 38 Chapter 2 meet the required pick up setting and operating time. Various shapes of time-current characteristics are also available. The air circuit-breakers are intended primarily for application in main switchboards to protect the incoming circuit fed by either a local generator or the low voltage side of a transformer directly from the power utility. They are also applicable for an individual branch-circuit protection where the highest quality device is required and where special time-current characteristics are necessary for co-ordination. These circuit-breakers are constructed for longer life than the other types of low-voltage circuit breakers and are, therefore, suitable for many more operations. However, unlike the MCCB or MCB, this type of equipment needs regular inspection and maintenance. Fig 2.14a A 3000-A ACB at operating position
  • 51. Circuit Breakers 39 The ACB is currently covered under BS EN 60947 [Ref. 1, Ref. 5] with the same specification as that described in section 2.3 for MCCB. Typically, an ACB manufacturer produces breakers with current ratings in the range 800 to 5000 A and a breaking capacity up to 120 kA. The followings are some typical data for reference. Rated voltage : 400, 415, 690 V Rated current : 800, 1250, 1600, 2000, 3200, 5000 A Rated breaking capacity : 40, 65, 80, 120 kA (r.m.s) Rated Making capacity : 84, 143, 220 kA (peak) A typical 3000-A ACB at loading position is shown in Figure 2.14a and the zoom-in view in Figure 2.14b. A cross-sectional view of a typical ACB is shown in Figure 2.15 and the time-current characteristics in Figure 2.16. Figure 2.14b A zoom-view of the 3000-A ACB . 2.5 RESIDUAL CURRENT-OPERATED CIRCUIT-BREAKERS The Residual Current-operated Circuit-Breakers (RCCB) are primarily designed to protect against ‘indirect contact’ electric shock. The term ‘indirect contact’ refers to the contact of the supply voltage indirectly
  • 52. 40 Chapter 2 through the touching of the exposed-conductive-part such as the metallic enclosures of electrical appliances, the metallic conduit, trunking or cable tray. These exposed-conductive-parts are insulated from the live conductor and are connected to the earthing terminal and thus, should be at the earth potential. However, during an earth fault, as there is an earth fault current flowing from the live conductor through the exposed-conductive- parts to earth, the exposed metalwork may be at a high potential relative to earth. Touching the exposed-conductive-parts at this instance may cause an electric shock if its potential to earth exceeds 50 V. Furthermore, if it is a high impedance earth fault, the magnitude of the earth fault current may not activate the overcurrent protective device. Thus, a current will continue to flow to earth, possibly generating heat and causing fire. RCCB is designed to detect such a residual current (i.e. earth leakage current), to compare it to a reference value and to open the protected circuit when the residual current exceeds this reference value. Arc chute Fixed arcing contact Moving arcing contact Fixed main contact Moving main contact Primary disconnecting terminals (main circuit) (clip type) Current transformer External Relay Motor (option) Figure 2.15 A cross-sectional view of an ACB In this way, a RCCB provides an excellent protection against the risk of electric shock and provides an excellent protection against the possibility of fire resulting from earth fault currents which tend to persist for lengthy periods without operating the overcurrent protective device. The primary function of a RCCB is to give protection against ‘indirect contact’. However, for RCCBs having operating residual currents not exceeding 30 mA, there is an additional benefit, should other methods of protection fail, the RCCB will provide a high degree of protection to a user making direct contact with a live conductive part.
  • 53. Circuit Breakers 41 1 2 5 10 100 Multiple of rated current 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1,000 Time (seconds) MAX MED MIN 4 to 10 2 to 4 Adjustable Figure 2.16 Time-current characteristics of a typical ACB Principle of Operation Figure 2.17 shows that an earth leakage current of 2 A passing through the live conductor on its way to earth, but not returning through the neutral. The difference between the phase and neutral currents is thus the earth leakage current. The principle of operation of a RCCB is shown in Figure 2.18. The main contacts are closed against spring pressure and the loaded spring provides the energy to open the contacts when the retaining mechanism is tripped. Phase and neutral currents pass through identical coils wound in opposite directions on a magnetic core, so each coil provides equal but opposite ampere-turns and no magnetic flux is set up when the currents are equal. Earth leakage current increases the phase current, which provides more ampere-turns than those from the neutral coil, and an alternating magnetic flux is set up in the core. This induces an e.m.f. in the search coil, which results in a current flowing in the trip coil, and the main contacts are tripped. For circuit breakers operating at low residual currents, an amplifier may be used. The main contacts are mechanically operated and the trip mechanism may become stiff with age. Frequent
  • 54. 42 Chapter 2 testing is advisable, and a test circuit is included to provide an artificial residual current. N L 230 V neutral current 10A earth fault current 2A phase current 12A load current 10A load resistance 23 Ω fault resistance 115 Ω fault current 2A 2A Figure 2.17 The earth leakage current Although the operating principle of a RCCB has been described in a single phase circuit, the same principle applies equally well to a three-phase RCCB. In a 3-phase 4-wire system, the circuit arrangement in the magnetic core is modified as shown in Figure 2.19. The red, yellow and blue phases and the neutral wire are wound on the common core in such a way that the search coil senses the phasor sum of the four currents (i.e. red, yellow, blue and neutral). In this arrangement, the magnetic flux produced by the current in the neutral will be compensated by the magnetic flux produced by the unbalanced current in the phase conductors. 230V L N amplifier trip coil search coil magnetic core test button load R Figure 2.18 Principle of the operation of RCCBs RCCBs are not designed to have a high breaking capacity and in fact, they have only a limited breaking capacity. They are therefore, not a replacement for other overcurrent protective devices which are designed to interrupt high fault currents. However, RCCBs are type-tested to ensure that they will withstand large fault currents that may pass through
  • 55. Circuit Breakers 43 them at close position. Thus, it is normally recommended to have an overcurrent protective device connected in series with the RCCB. R Y B N Search Coil Magnetic core to activate tripping Figure 2.19 Detecting leakage current in a 3-phase 4-wire system RCCB Standards There are four standards for RCCBs namely, BS 4293 : 1983 [Ref. 6], IEC 755 : 1983 (1992) [Ref. 7], IEC 1008-1 : 1990 [Ref. 8] and Singapore Standard SS 97 : 1994 [Ref. 9]. BS 4293 specifies the requirements for residual current-operated circuit breakers having a rated voltage not exceeding 660 V, a rated current not exceeding 125 A and a rated frequency not exceeding 400 Hz. IEC 755 applies to residual current- operated protective devices for a rated voltage not exceeding 440 V and a rated current not exceeding 200 A with a rated residual current up to 20 A intended principally for protection against electric shock. IEC 1008 -1 applies to RCCBs for household and similar uses for a rated voltage not exceeding 440 V and a rated current not exceeding 125 A with a rated residual current up to 0.5 A intended principally for protection against electric shock. The Singapore Standard SS 97 is just an endorsement of the IEC 1008 -1. Based on IEC 1008, RCCBs are specified as follows : Preferred rated voltage Single-phase, phase-to-neutral : 230 V Three-phase, three-wire : 400 V Three-phase, 4-wire : 400 V Preferred rated current (IN) 10, 13, 16, 20, 25, 32, 40, 63, 80, 100, 125 A Rated residual operating current (I NΔ ) 0.006, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5 A
  • 56. 44 Chapter 2 Standard value of residual non-operating current (I NΔ 0) 0.5 I NΔ Minimum value of the rated making and breaking capacity 10 IN or 500 A whichever is greater Rated conditional short-circuit current This is the prospective short-circuit current passing through the RCCB at close position and the RCCB can withstand under the specified conditions. 3, 4.5, 6, 10, 20 kA Maximum break time 0.3 s for residual current equal to I NΔ 0.15 s for residual current equal to 2 I NΔ 0.04 s for residual current equal to 5 I NΔ 0.04 s for residual current equal to 500 A Other requirements RCCBs shall be protected against short-circuits by means of circuit- breakers or fuses. ♦ ♦ RCCBs are essentially intended to be operated by uninstructed persons and designed to be maintenance free. 2.6 APPLICATION EXAMPLES The low-voltage supply to a two-storey shophouse is shown in Figure 1.17 and Figure 1.18. MCCBs are used in the main incoming circuit and the three outgoing circuits at the main switchboard as shown in Figure 1.17. For the tenant DB T1 as shown in Figure 1.18, one MCCB and one RCCB are used at the incoming circuit, and both single-phase and three-phase MCBs are used for all the outgoing circuits. Examples 2.1 A distribution board(DB) has a RCCB rated at 63 A with a residual operating current I = 0.03 A, and three final circuits, each protected by a type C MCB rated at 25 A as shown in Figure 2.20. Determine the operating time of the RCCB and MCB under each of the following conditions : NΔ
  • 57. Circuit Breakers 45 a) A constant overload of 28 A for 1 hour in the first circuit. b) A sustained short-circuit current of 2000 A from live-to-neutral in the second circuit. c) A high impedance sustained short-circuit current of 63.75 A from live- to-earth in the third circuit. Figure 2.20 A simple DB Solution a) The RCCB will not operate since the phasor sum of the overload currents is zero. The 25-A MCB will not operate since the overload is less than 1.13 IN. From Table 2.2, tripping should not occur at I = 1.13 IN and for t > 1 hr. This can also be verified by examining the time- current characteristics shown in Figures 2.9 or 2.10. b) The RCCB will not operate since the short circuit is from live-to-neutral which has a zero phasor sum. The short-circuit current is 2000/25 = 80 IN which is more than 10 IN. From Table 2.2, the operation time of the MCB is less than 0.1 s. c) The residual current is 63.75/0.03 = 2125 I NΔ which is greater than 5 I NΔ . Based on IEC 1008, the maximum break time for a residual current more than 5 I NΔ is 0.04 s. If the RCCB fails to operate, the MCB will operate according to Table 2.2 within 60 s since the earth fault current is 63.75/25=2.55 IN. The operating time obtained from Figure 2.9 or Figure 2.10 is 50 s. RCCB 63A MCB 25A I = 0.03A O/L = 28A for 1 hour IF,LN = 2000A IF,LE = 63.75A Δn MCB 25A MCB 25A
  • 58. 46 Chapter 2 Example 2.2 Determine the type of protective device and the required breaking capacity for a circuit supply to a 3-phase motor which is rated at 20 kW, 95% efficiency and 0.85 power factor. This motor has a DOL starter. The main switchboard is fed by a 1-MVA, 22-kV/LV transformer which has a leakage impedance of 5% as shown in Figure 2.21. Determine the current rating of the circuit breaker for ambient temperatures of 200C and 400C respectively. The time-current characteristic curve of the protective device is shown in Figure 2.13. 22 kV LV1 MVA 5 % 95% Eff. 0.85 p.f. 20 kW ? DOL M Figure 2.21 Determine the type of protective device Solution Let the design current be the full load current :- A75.35 400385.095.0 1020 3 .. = ××× × == LFB II For a DOL starter, the motor starting current is seven times the full load current(i.e. 250 A). This high starting current will be reduced to the full load current within 10 s. The 5% impedance of the 1 MVA transformer with respect to the voltage at 400 V is Z = 5% x (4002 / 1 x 106 )= 0.008 Ω The maximum current that may pass through the breaker occurs during a 3-phase fault at the breaker terminal. The current per-phase during the 3- phase fault at the breaker terminal is: IF,3-phase,breaker terminal = (400 / 3 ) / 0.008 = 28.867 kA Thus, the type of protective device should be a MCCB with a breaking capacity more than 28.867 kA. A MCCB with a breaking capacity of 35 kA is selected. For an ambient temperature of 200 C, a 63-A MCCB is adequate. The starting current expressed as a multiple of the breaker rating is : NI3.97 63 250 I ×==,S
  • 59. Circuit Breakers 47 From Figure 2.13, the operating time of the breaker is 18 s which is greater than the starting duration of 10 s and thus, this breaker will not trip during motor starting. For an ambient temperature of 400C as shown in Figure 2.13 and for the operating time of 10 s, the corresponding current multiplier is 2.2. Thus, the current rating of the MCCB should be greater than Imin : A113 2.2 250 Imin == Thus, a current rating of 200 A is selected. Example 2.3 The low-voltage supply to a high-rise block is shown in Figure 2.22. A short circuit occurs inside a final distribution board at the top floor. The fault current is 200 A. (a) What is the operating time of the incoming protective device at the final DB under the following assumption? (i) a type B MCB rated at 32 A (ii) a type 3 MCB rated at 32 A (iii) a RCCB rated at 40 A with I NΔ = 0.03 A (b) Determine the operating time of the MCCB rated at 300 A at the main switchboard of the block. (c) Determine the operating time of the BS 88 fuse rated at 400 A at the PUB substation. Solution (a) (i) For a type B MCB rated at 32 A, the fault current expressed as a multiple of the rated current is : IF = = 200 32 6 25. IN The operating time obtained from Table 2.2 or from Figure 2.10 is less than 0.1 s.
  • 60. 48 Chapter 2 (ii) For a type 3 MCB rated at 32 A, the fault current is : IF = = 200 32 6 25. IN The operating time is 8 s obtained from Figure 2.10. (iii) For a RCCB rated at 40 A with A03.0I N =Δ , the RCCB will not operate if the fault current of 200 A is due to a live-to-neutral fault. If it is a live- to-earth fault, the operating time is 0.04 s, since the residual current is 200/0.03 = 6667 I NΔ . (b) The MCCB rated at 300 A will not operate unless it is an earth fault and the MCCB is equipped with an earth fault relay. (c) The BS 88 fuse rated at 400 A will not operate at a current of 200 A. Figure 2.22 LV Supply to a high-rise Block MCB 32A 200A MCCB 300A Main Switchboard BS 88 fuse 400A Utility A final DB at top floor
  • 61. Circuit Breakers 49 2.7 REFERENCES [1] BS EN 60947-2 : 1992, “Low voltage switchgear and controlgear, Part 2. Circuit Breaker”, The British Standard, 1992. [2] BS EN 60898 : 1991, “Circuit breakers for overcurrent protection for household and similar installations”, The British Standard, 1991. [3] IEC 947-2 : 1989, “Low voltage switchgear and controlgear Part 2 : Circuit Breakers”, International Electrotechnical Commission, 1989. [4] BS 3871 : Part 1 : 1965 (1984), “Miniature air-break circuit breakers for a.c. circuits”, British Standard, 1984. [5] BS EN 60947-1 : 1992, “Low voltage switchgear and controlgear Part 1. General Rules”, The British Standard, 1992. [6] BS 4293 : 1983, “Residual current-operated circuit-breakers”, The British Standard, 1983. [7] IEC 755 : 1983 (1992), “General requirements for residual current operated protective devices”, International Electrotechnical Commission, 1992. [8] IEC 1008-1 : 1990, “Residual current operated circuit-breakers without integral overcurrent protection for household and similar uses (RCCB’s), Part 1 : General Rules”, International Electrotechnical Commission, 1990. [9] SS 97 : Part 1 : 1994, “Residual current circuit breaker without integral overcurrent protection for household and similar uses (RCCB’s)”, SISIR, 1994. [10] SS 359 : 1996, “Circuit breakers for overcurrent protection for household and similar installations”, SISIR, 1996.
  • 62. CHAPTER 3 CABLE AND SIZING OF CONDUCTORS Cables are the means by which electrical energy is distributed from its source to its point of use. A cable can be defined as a length of insulated single conductor or of two or more such conductors each provided with its own insulation which are laid up together. The insulated conductor or conductors may or may not be provided with overall covering for mechanical protection. A single-core cable refers to a cable that has only one insulated conductor with its own cable sheath, and a multi-core cable refers to a cable that has multiple cores of insulated conductors within one common sheath. Figure 3.1 illustrates a twin-core, pvc-insulated, pvc-bedded, steel- wire-armoured, pvc-sheathed cable made to BS 6346 : 1989 [Ref. 1]. Cables also form an essential part of communications, security and control systems. Cables for these systems must be chosen to avoid interference from the power cable [Ref. 2, Ref. 4]. PVC Sheath Steel wire armoured PVC insulated Conductor Figure 3.1 A PVC-insulated steel-wire-armoured cable 3.1 CABLE CONSTRUCTION The conductor of a cable refers to one conductor or several conductors which provides electrical paths. They are fabricated from metals having low resistivity. A conductor may be formed from solid material or made up from a number of strands of smaller wire. Conductors are made in a number of standard metric cross-sectional areas in the range from 1.5mm2 to 1000 mm2. 50
  • 63. Cable and Sizing of Conductors 51 The two common types of conductor material are copper and aluminium. The specific resistance of copper and aluminium at 700C is 0.017 and 0.0283 respectively, both expressed in Ω per mm2 per metre. In recent years, aluminium has become a major alternative to copper as a conductor material because of its attractive price. However, aluminium has a higher specific resistance than copper and is therefore, not a good conductor compared to the same size of the copper conductor. For the same current rating, a 300 mm2 aluminium cable is approximately equivalent to a 185 mm2 copper cable under the same conditions of installation. Insulation The insulation surrounds each conductor to prevent direct contact between individual conductors and earth. The type of insulation will depend on the voltage of the system, the operating temperature of the conductors, and the mechanical and environmental conditions affecting the cable during both installation and operation. Typical types of insulation materials are; polyvinyl chloride (pvc), rubber, cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE), powdered mineral, and oil impregnated paper tapes. A conductor and its immediate insulation is colloquially known as a core. A cable may comprise a single core with or without further mechanical protection or a number of cores laid up together and held in position by a sheath or tape binding. Cable cores are generally identified by colour code : red, yellow, blue for phase conductors, black for neutral and green/yellow for circuit protective conductors (earth conductors) according to BS 6004 : 1991 [Ref. 3]. The rated voltage of a cable is normally expressed as V0/V when V0 is the voltage between any insulated conductor to earth and V is the voltage between phase-conductors of a multi-core cable or of a system of single- core cables. Low-voltage power cables are generally rated at 450/750 V [Ref. 3] or 600/1000 V [Ref. 1] regardless of the voltage used, be it 120 V, 230V, 240V or 400V. External Protection Wiring cables intended for installation in a conduit, trunking or similar enclosures are usually insulated single-core cables and are unsuitable for installation in other circumstances. Other types of cable are provided with further external protection.
  • 64. 52 Chapter 3 External protection applied over the various cores of the cable (one core or more) is intended to provide protection against mechanical damage and hostile environmental attacks. It is also intended in the case of power cables, particularly HV cables, to provide resistance to the considerable mechanical forces which may occur under short-circuit fault conditions. In the case of conductors insulated with oil impregnated tapes, the external sheath is usually made of extruded lead or lead alloy, designed to form a anti-moisture protection for the hydrotropic insulation. For other cables, the external protection may comprise metallic or plastic sheaths, or a combination of these, with a layer of metallic armour being provided where extra mechanical protection is required. 3.2 CABLE TYPE AND SELECTION To meet various electrical and environmental operating conditions, multitude types of cable which are available for incorporation in the low- voltage system are required. Guidance on the selection of types of cables is given in Chapter 52 and Appendix 4 of the IEE Regulation [Ref. 2], or CP5 [Ref. 4]. The current carrying capacity of a cable must be sufficient to cater for the maximum sustained current which will normally flow through it. The insulation must be adequate to deal with the voltages of the system and it must not be damaged by the heat produced by the current flow, high ambient temperatures or by heat transferred to it from hot objects. Voltage drop requirements and short circuit thermal stresses must also be catered for. Due to electromagnetic effects, certain types of cable are precluded from use in specified circumstances. Regulation 521-02 [Ref. 2] forbids the use of single-core cables having steel armour on a.c. systems. Environmental conditions may require cables which are capable of operation in the presence of water or moisture, or when subjected to fire risk, or in extremes of temperature. It may have to operate under mechanical stress and vibration. If the environment is such that the cable is subjected to such hazards, cables should be selected with appropriate insulation and sheathing materials. The commonly used low-voltage cables are as follows : ♦ Non-armoured pvc-insulated cables installed in conduits and trunking systems for internal wiring.
  • 65. Cable and Sizing of Conductors 53 ♦ Non-armoured pvc-insulated and pvc-sheathed cables for general indoor use, particularly in domestic and commercial installations. ♦ Armoured pvc-insulated cables for mains and sub-mains applications (i.e. utility’s low-voltage circuits buried underground). ♦ Fire resistant cables or mineral insulated metal sheathed cables used in areas of extreme temperatures or for circuits supplied to fire- fighting equipment. ♦ Heat, oil and flame retardant (hofr) cables are intended for use in severe conditions : examples of these are csp (chlorosulphinated polyethylene) and pcp (polycholoroprene) sheathed cables. While many relevant factors need to be taken into account, probably the most significant factor in cable selection and installation is temperature. Most of the insulating materials and sheath cables are liable to failure in the presence of excessive temperatures. All wires used in cable making have a resistance which, when current is passed through it, give rise to heat. Cable selection, therefore, is primarily related to the size of the cable that will carry the required current without the temperature of the surrounding insulation rising above a critical level that will result in the breakdown of the insulation. PVC insulated cables to BS 6004 [Ref. 3] for example, are suitable only as long as the conductor temperature does not exceed 700C, whereas mineral insulated cables to BS 6207 : 1991 [Ref. 5] fitted with high temperature terminations can be operated up to 1350C. Test Voltage on Completed Cable All completed cables from factory shall be subjected to voltage tests. An a.c. voltage shall be applied between conductors, and between each conductor and the sheath which shall be earthed. The voltage shall be increased gradually and maintained at the full value for 5 minutes without breakdown of the insulation according to Table 3.1. Table 3.1 A.C. Testing on Completed Cables Voltage Rating Test Voltage between Conductors, V (r.m.s.) Test Voltage between any Conductor and Earth, V (r.m.s.) 600/1,000 3,000 3,000 19,00/3,300 10,000 5,800 3,800/6,600 17,000 9,800 6,350/11,000 25,000 14,400 12,700/22,000 -- 30,000
  • 66. 54 Chapter 3 Test Voltage after Installation Any voltage test after installation should be made with d.c. voltage. The voltage should be increased gradually to the full value and maintained continuously for 15 minutes according to Table 3.2. No breakdown should occur. Table 3.2 D.C. Testing after Installation Voltage Rating Test Voltage between Conductors, V (d.c.) Test Voltage between any Conductor and Sheath, V (d.c.) 600/1,000 3,500 3,500 1,900/3,300 10,000 7,000 3,800/6,600 20,000 15,000 6,350/11,000 34,000 25,000 12,700/22,000 - 50,000 Standard Size of Conductor In the United States of America, the standard cable sizes are expressed in AWG/MCM. It is rather difficult to get one-to-one equivalent to the standard sizes expressed in mm2. Table 3.3 is, therefore, provided for quick reference. Table 3.3 Standard cross-sections of round copper conductors ISO AWG/MCM cross-section, (mm2) Size Equivalent cross-section, (mm2) 1.5 16 1.3 2.5 14 2.1 4 12 3.3 6 10 5.3 10 8 8.4 16 6 13.3 25 4 21.2 35 2 33.6 50 0 53.5 70 00 67.4 95 000 85 - 0000 107.2 120 250 MCM 127 150 300 MCM 152 185 350 MCM 177 240 500 MCM 253 300 600 MCM 304
  • 67. Cable and Sizing of Conductors 55 3.3 CURRENT RATING OF CABLE The current rating of a cable is determined by a number of factors, namely ♦ Ambient temperature ♦ Maximum allowable conductor temperature ♦ Conductor material ♦ Insulation material ♦ Installation methods A cable rated at 30 A can also be loaded up to 40 A or 45 A without any problem except that the conductor’s temperature is increased. The temperature at which the conductors of a cable are allowed to operate continuously without damage to the cables and for a reasonable service life, depends on the insulation material used and the construction of the cable. For example, pvc insulated cables to BS 6004 [Ref. 3] are suitable for use where the conductor temperature under normal load conditions does not exceed 700C. It is not a normal practice for the design engineer to determine directly the likely operating temperature of a range of cables. The designer relies therefore, on the tabulated current carrying capacities ( It ) such as those in Appendix 4 of the IEE Regulation [Ref. 2] or CP5 [Ref. 4]. These tabulated values will ensure that excessive temperatures are not reached. It should, however, be pointed out that the tabulated current ratings are based upon a given set of conditions : ♦ An ambient temperature of 300C. ♦ The heating effect of adjacent cables is not considered. ♦ The cable is installed in a way that corresponds to the rating table being used. ♦ There is no surrounding thermal insulation. Let us define the above conditions as the preferred operating conditions. Should any of these conditions be changed, the cable rating has to be adjusted according to the appropriate correction factor. A cable rated at 30 A in one set of conditions may be suitable for carrying only 10 A or 15 A in other conditions. A cable may be seriously damaged, leading to early failure, if it is operated for any prolonged period at a temperature higher than the specified value. Ambient Temperature Correction Factor (Ca) Tabulated cable ratings are based upon 300C, as this is the temperature most commonly experienced in normal occupied premises. However, even in
  • 68. 56 Chapter 3 such buildings, a higher temperature can occur in the vincinity of heating equipment or other sources of heat. The designer must, in such cases, apply a suitable correction factor. For an ambient temperature higher than the specified temperature of 300C, the rate of flow of heat out of the conductor will be lower than that of the specified condition. This will increase the conductor’s operating temperature above the value permitted. This means that the current- carrying capacity of the conductor has to be reduced to compensate for the reduction in the heat lost from the conductor. Correction factors for ambient temperature in determining the current- carrying capacity of a cable are provided in Table 4C1 of IEE Regulation [Ref. 2] or CP5 [Ref. 4]. For a general purpose, pvc- insulated cable with a conductor operating temperature of 700C, the correction factors for a range of ambient temperatures are summarised in Table 3.4. Table 3.4 Temperature Correction Factors for pvc Cable Ambient Temperature 0C 25 30 35 40 45 50 Correction Factor Ca 1.03 1.0 0.94 0.87 0.79 0.71 For example, a four-core pvc-insulated cable enclosed in trunking has a tabulated current capacity of 80 A. If the ambient temperature is 500C, the current rating is reduced to 80A x 0.71 = 56.8 A. The ambient temperature refers to the temperature of the cable surrounding media and does not include the temperature of the equipment. This factor has to be applied even if only a short length of the cable route is installed in the area that has a higher ambient temperature. Grouping Correction Factor (Cg) Cables installed in the same enclosure or bundled together will get warm when all are carrying current. Those close to the edges of the enclosures will be able to release heat outward but will be restricted in losing heat inwards towards other warm cables. Cables in the centre of the enclosure may find it difficult to lose heat at all and will thus increase the conductor temperature. Table 4B1 of IEE regulations [Ref. 2] or CP5 [Ref. 4] gives correction factors for cables installed in close proximity or bundled together. Correction factors for groups of more than one circuit of a single-core cable, or more than one multi-core cable are summarised in Table 3.5. These correction factors have to be applied to the tabulated
  • 69. Cable and Sizing of Conductors 57 current-carrying capacities depending upon how the cables or circuits are grouped. Table 3.5 Grouping Correction Factor No. of circuits or multi-core cables 1 2 3 4 5 6 Bunched and clipped direct 1 0.8 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.57 Single layer clipped direct and touching 1 0.85 0.79 0.75 0.73 0.72 Single layer clipped direct and Spaced * 1 0.94 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 * spaced by a clearance between adjacent surfaces of at least one cable diameter. If the conductors are more than twice their overall diameters apart, no correction factor needs to be applied. However, the factor has to be applied even if only a short length of cable route is grouped. Thus, it may be necessary to use a number of separate entries to an enclosure in order to keep the cables concerned adequately separated so that the grouping factor need not be applied. Example 3.1 A heater rated at 230 V, 3 kW is to be installed using twin-with-earth pvc- insulated and sheathed cable clipped direct in a roof space that has an ambient temperature of 400C. The circuit is protected by a 15-A MCB. The cable is bundled with four other twin-and-earth cables for a short distance as shown in Figure 3.2. Determine the minimum tabulated current rating of the circuit and the size of the conductor. 15A MCB 14m, clipped direct 400 C 3 kW Heater bundled with four other circuits Figure 3.2 Circuit for Example 3.1 Solution The design current is : A13 230 3000 =IB =
  • 70. 58 Chapter 3 The current rating of the protective device (IN ) is 15 A. From Table 3.4, the temperature corrective factor at 400C is : Ca = 0.87 From Table 3.5, the grouping factor of five circuits is : Cg = 0.6 The minimum tabulated current rating It, min for the circuit is : A28.74 0.60.87 15 CC I =I ga N mint, = × = × From Table 4D2A of IEE Regulation [Ref. 2], column 6, a 4 mm2 cable which has a tabulated current rating of 36 A is selected. It should be noted that although the design current is only 13 A, a 4 mm2 cable rated at 36 A is selected. In fact, for the same design current of 13 A under the preferred operating conditions, a 1 mm2 cable rated at 15A is sufficient. Example 3.2 Determine the minimum tabulated current rating of a multi-core, pvc- insulated cable connected to a 3-phase motor rated at 400 V, 15 kW, 0.8 power factor and 90% efficiency. This motor is subjected to frequent start/stop and is operating at an ambient temperature of 350C as shown in Figure 3.3. MCB 4C /Cu/PVC/NA, trunking 35°C M 15kW 0.8 p.f. 90% Eff. Figure 3.3 Circuit for Example 3.2 Solution The design current is : I = 15 1000 400 B × × × × = 0 8 0 9 3 30 07 . . . A For frequent start/stop, it is suggested that the minimum circuit rating be selected from 1.25 to 1.4 of IB. Let us select the higher value of 1.4 and thus the minimum tabulated circuit rating is 1.4 x 30.07 = 42.10 A. To incorporate temperature correction, the minimum tabulated circuit rating is : B
  • 71. Cable and Sizing of Conductors 59 A44.79 0.94 42.10 =I mint, = From Table 4D2A of IEE Regulation [Ref. 2], column 5, a 10 mm2 4-core cable which has a tabulated current rating of 46 A is selected. Thermal Insulation Correction Factor (Ci) To reduce the energy cost for heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC), many new buildings are now provided with better thermal insulating material for roofs and cavity walls to reduce the heat loss. As thermal insulation is designed to limit heat flow, a cable in contact with it will tend to become warmer than the preferred operation conditions. IEE Regulation 523-04 [Ref. 2] recommends that for a single cable which is likely to be surrounded by thermally insulating material over a length of 0.5 m, the thermal correction factor (Ci) is 0.5 times the tabulated current carrying capacity for that cable clipped direct to a surface (method 1). If the surrounded length is less than 0.5 m, the correction factor (Ci) can be higher than 0.5 [Ref. 2, P78], [Ref.4, 99]. Example 3.3 The circuit is the same as that for Example 3.1, except that the cable has to pass through a thermal insulation area over a length of 2 m. Determine the minimum tabulated current rating of the circuit and the size of conductor. Solution The minimum tabulated current rating for the circuit is : A57.47 0.50.60.87 15 CCC I =I iga N mint, = ×× = ×× From Table 4D2A of IEE Regulation [Ref. 2], column 6, a twin-core cable of 10 mm2 which has a tabulated current of 63 A is selected. Examples 3.1 and 3.3 illustrate that for a design current of 13 A, the cable size has to increase substantially due to three correction factors from 1 mm2 (15 A) to 4 mm2 (36 A) and to 10 mm2 (63 A). Thus, the designer should, as far as possible, rearrange the cable route, to avoid grouping, high ambient temperature and thermal insulation area so that no correction factor needs to apply.
  • 72. 60 Chapter 3 3.4 VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATION A design engineer must have a working knowledge of voltage drop calculations, not only to meet the relevant code, but also to ensure that the voltage applied to the electrical appliances is maintained within proper limits. Most electrical appliances are designed to operate within a voltage tolerance of + 10%. The utility supply regulations normally ensure that the voltage variations at the supply intake are kept within +6% of the declared nominal voltage. The designer must therefore, ensure that the voltage drop from the supply intake to the terminals of any appliance does not exceed 4% of the declared nominal voltage. Thus, all electrical appliances can be operated safely and be fully functional within their design voltage tolerance of +10%. IEE Regulation 525-01 [Ref. 2] specifies that the voltage drop between the origin of the installation and the fixed current- using equipment should not exceed 4% of the nominal voltage of the supply. Consideration should be given to both the steady state and transient conditions. Transient conditions refer mostly to the motor starting period, and a greater voltage drop may be accepted provided that the voltage variations should not exceed those specified in the relevant standards or the equipment manufacturer’s recommendation. Tabulated Voltage Drop Constant (TVD) Figure 3.4 shows a voltage drop of 7 V from the sending end to one terminal of the appliance when the circuit is carrying its rated current IR. This voltage drop is due to the resistance of 1.4 mΩ for the live conductor. Let us define this voltage drop in one conductor, one way as the line-to-neutral voltage drop. We can therefore multiply this line-to-neutral voltage drop by 2 to obtain the total voltage drop at the terminals of the appliance under the assumption that in a single phase circuit, the value of resistance in the neutral conductor is the same as the live conductor. This is usually true as the conductor’s material, size and length are identical to those of the live conductor. The voltage drop in the single-phase circuit as shown in Figure 3.4, can be written as : Vdrop = IR (1.4 mΩ x 100 + 1.4 mΩ x 100) = IR (1.4 mΩ x 2) x 100 = IR (2.8 mΩ) x 100 = IR x TVD x 100
  • 73. Cable and Sizing of Conductors 61 Appliance230V IR = 50A 7 V 216 V 1.4mΩ x 100 meters 7 V Figure 3.4 Illustration for Voltage Drop Calculation TVD (i.e. 2.8 mΩ) is in fact the tabulated voltage-drop constant that appeared in the cable tables of Appendix 4 of the IEE Regulation [Ref.2]. This tabulated voltage-drop constant (TVD) is expressed in mΩ per ampere per metre run (i.e. for a current of 1 A and for a distance of 1 m along the route taken by the cables). For cables having conductors of 16 mm2 and lower, as the values of reactance are very much less than the values of resistance, the inductance can be ignored, and only the values of (mV/A/m)r are tabulated. For cables having conductors greater than 16mm2, the impedance values (mV/A/m)z are tabulated together with the resistive component (mV/A/m)r and the reactive component (mV/A/m)x. To simplify the voltage drop calculation for single-phase circuits, the values of TVDr and TVDx are so arranged that TVDr is twice the value of the per- phase cable resistance and TVDx is also twice the value of the per-phase cable reactance. For three-phase circuits, the line-to-line voltage is equal to 3 multiplied by the line-to-neutral voltage. Similarly, the line-to-line voltage drop is also equal to 3 multiplied by the line-to-neutral voltage drop. Thus, for three-phase circuits, the values of TVD are also arranged as 3 multiplied by the values of the per-phase cable resistance and the per-phase cable reactance. Voltage Drop Formulae For most practical cases, the voltage angle difference between the sending end and the receiving end is almost zero, and the line-to-neutral voltage drop, [Ref. 6, P 97, P 629] in a circuit, taking into account the per-phase current ( I ), the power factor (cosθ), and the values of the per-phase resistance(R) and reactance(X) is : Vdrop = I R cosθ + IX sinθ
  • 74. 62 Chapter 3 Example 3.4 A 3-phase motor with a full load current of 102A, and a power factor of 0.8 is to be fed by four single-core, pvc-insulated, copper conductor, non- armoured cables, clipped direct on a non-metallic surface at 75-metre run as shown in Figure 3.5. Determine the size of conductor if the permissible voltage drop from the MCB to the motor terminal is 2%. 4 x 1C / Cu/PVC/NA, clipped direct IFL = 102A 75m 0.8 p.f.M MCB Figure 3.5 Circuit for Example 3.4 Solution Let the design current IB be the motor’s full load current. From Table 4D1A of IEE Regulation [Ref. 2], column 7, a 25 mm2 cable with a current rating of 104 A is initially selected, and the line-to-line voltage drop is calculated as : ( ) ( ) V400ofor 2.496%V9.983 1000 751020.60.1750.81.5 1000 lengthIsinTVD+cosTVD =V Br LLdrop, = ×××+× = ××× θθ The calculated Vdrop, LL is 2.496% that exceeds 2% of 400 V. Thus, the next higher size of 35 mm2 is selected and Vdrop, LL is re-calculated : ( ) 1.88%orV512.7 1000 751026.017.00.8.11 V LL,drop = ×××+× = This calculated voltage drop is 1.88% of 400 V and thus, a 35 mm2 cable is recommended. Example 3.5 The circuit is the same as in Example 3.4, except that the full load current is reduced to 50 A and the cable selected is a 10 mm2 cable for 30-metre run. Determine the voltage drop. Solution For the 10 mm2 cable, as the reactance is very much less than the resistance, the tabulated reactive component TVDx is zero and the voltage drop can be calculated as :
  • 75. Cable and Sizing of Conductors 63 ( ) V4.56= 1000 30500.83.8 1000 3050sin0+cosTVD V r LLdrop, ××× = ××× = θθ Another approach of multiplying TVDr by the design current and the cable length is also acceptable. However, it may lead to a pessimistically higher calculated value, such as : V7.5 1000 30508.3 1000 lengthITVD V Br LL,drop = ×× = ×× = Temperature Correction on Resistive Value The value of resistance of a conductor is usually given at a conductor temperature of 200 C in the relevant standards or cable manufacturers. As the temperature of the conductor increases due to the load current, the value of resistance will also increase according to the resistance- temperature coefficient. This coefficient is approximately equal to 0.004 per 0 C at 200 C for both copper and aluminium conductors [Ref. 2, P178]. Based on this coefficient and as shown in Figure 3.6, the value of resistance will be zero mathematically at a conductor temperature of −2300 C. Similarly, if the resistance value is given at 700 C, (denoted as Ω70), the resistance value at 1600 C (Ω160 ) can be calculated by : 1.3 70230 160230 7070160 ×Ω=⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ + + Ω=Ω Ω 0.004 0-230 -100 160115957020-200 Ω160 Ω115 Ω95 Ω70 Ω20 At 200 C, the resistance temperature coefficient is 0.004 per 0 C 0 C Figure 3.6 Calculation of Resistance Value at Various Temperatures
  • 76. 64 Chapter 3 If the resistance value at a temperature of 200C is given, the resistance at the other temperatures such as Ω115 or Ω95 can also be calculated as : 1.3 20230 95230 1.38 20230 115230 202095 2020115 ×Ω=⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ + + Ω=Ω ×Ω=⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ + + Ω=Ω Conductor Temperature on Voltage Drop The resistive value TVDr is based on the resistance of the conductor at the rated temperature (e.g. 700C for pvc-insulated copper conductor) corresponding to the conductor carrying its rated current. Thus, if the design current is significantly less than the rated current of the cable, the actual value of the resistance will be lower than the tabulated value due to the lower conductor temperature. In this case, the direct use of TVDr may lead to pessimistically high-calculated values of voltage drop. As the value of reactance is not influenced by temperature, the temperature correction does not apply to the value of reactance. Example 3.6 A three-phase circuit consisting of 4 x 10mm2 Cu/pvc/non-armoured single- core cables is selected to feed an electrical appliance which has a design current of 50 A at 0.8 power factor as shown in Figure 3.7. The circuit length is 30m and the ambient temperature is 250C. Determine the voltage drop by taking into consideration a lower conductor temperature. Figure 3.7 Circuit for Example 3.6 Solution As the conductor temperature is proportional to the square of the current passing through the conductor, we can write: 2 t 2 b rp a50A I I tt t-t = − Where t50A is the conductor temperature when carrying a current of 50A, ta (250 C) is the ambient temperature, tp (700 C) is the conductor rated
  • 77. Cable and Sizing of Conductors 65 temperature when carrying the tabulated current(It) of 59 A, Ib (50 A) is the design current and tr (300 C) is the reference ambient temperature. Thus, the conductor’s actual operating temperature when carrying a current of 50A, t50A is : ( ) ( ) C53.73 3070 59 50 25 tt I I tt 2 2 rp2 t 2 b a50A o = −+= −+= The corrected TVDr at 53.730 C is : ( ) 3.594 0.94583.8 70230 53.73230 TVDTVD r53.73r = ×= ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ + + = ( )( ) V4.313 1000 30500.83.594 1000 lengthIcosTVD V B53.73r LL,drop = ××× = ×× = θ The voltage drop of 4.313 V is actually 94.58% of the voltage drop obtained by directly multiplying the TVDr value. If the design current is 29.5 A which is half of the conductor rated current (i.e. the cable is 50% loaded), the conductor temperature at 29.5A will be : ( ) C35 3070 2 1 25t 2 29.5 o = −⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ += The corrected TVDr at 350 C is : ( ) rr35r TVD0.88 70230 35230 TVDTVD =⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ + + = Thus, the actual voltage drop is only 88% of the voltage drop obtained by directly multiplying the TVDr value. 3.5 PROTECTION AGAINST OVERLOAD Overload currents may occur in various circuits in an installation. These overload circuits are electrically sound but are carrying more current than
  • 78. 66 Chapter 3 their rated capacity. These may be caused by a user deliberately or accidentally using more power than the circuit is designed for, or due to the design errors in estimating the maximum demand in some sections of the installation. The consequences of such an overload to the installation are that the temperature of the conductors and of their insulation will rise to the level where the effectiveness of the insulation and its expected life may be reduced. Circuit breakers or fuses are required to automatically detect overloads and to break the circuit if such overloads exceed a pre- determined value within a specified duration. 3.5.1 Required Conditions for Overload Protection To provide an adequate protection for overload, IEE Regulation 433 [Ref. 2], requires the following conditions to be satisfied : i) IN < IZ ii) I2 < 1.45 IZ Where Iz is the current rating of the cable under the particular installation conditions, IN is the current rating of the protective device and I2 is the current magnitude causing an effective operation of the protective device. The effective operating time is defined as 1, 2, 3 or 4 hours. For MCB, I2 is 1.45 IN. For MCCB and ACB, I2 is 1.3 IN. The effective operating time is 2 hours, except for breakers less than 63 A where the effective operating time is reduced to 1 hour. If the protective device is a fuse, I2 is 1.6 IN and the effective operating time is in the range from 1 to 4 hours depending on the current rating of the fuse. Since one of the prime functions of the protective device is to protect the cable from being overloaded, its current rating must not be greater than that of the cable to be protected, i.e. IN < IZ. The factor of 1.45 in condition (ii) is based on a combination of experience and investigation. Condition (ii) implies that the current in the circuit is allowed to increase to 145% of the cable rated capacity. In this loading condition, the temperature of the conductor will be higher than its rated temperature but is still below its critical temperature. For example, for pvc-insulated copper conductor cable, the rated conductor temperature is 700C, and the critical temperature is in the range from 1400C to 1600C. The loading at 145% is about 1140C [Ref. 7, P 83]. The reduction of the factor from 1.45 downwards will result in the reduction of the overload capability of the circuit or even cause unnecessary tripping on minor overload.
  • 79. Cable and Sizing of Conductors 67 Table 3.6 gives a sample of various rated conductor temperatures for two types of cables. It should be noted that operations at the overload temperature are acceptable provided that such operations shall not exceed 100 hrs per year and such 100-hr period shall not exceed five times [Ref. 6, P 559]. The critical temperature refers to the temperature that will cause insulation failure. Table 3.6 Rated Conductor Temperature Cable Type Rated Temperature ( 0 C ) Overload Temperature ( 0 C ) Critical Temperature ( 0 C ) PVC-insulated 75 95 150 Cross-linked 90 130 250 To assess whether there is an overload protection and how adequate it is, let us define the degree of overload protection as: OL_P_Yes ≡ 100% x (1.45 IZ - I2 ) / 1.45 IZ A positive value of OL_P_Yes implies that the circuit is adequately protected against overload current, and a higher percentage means that the circuit is more unlikely to be overloaded. Obviously, a negative percentage indicates that the circuit is not provided with overload protection. Example 3.7 The designed current of a circuit is 49 A and it is fed by a 4 x 10 mm2 single-core copper conductor, pvc-insulated cables installed in trunking. This circuit is protected by a 50A MCCB as shown in Figure 3.8. a) Does this circuit satisfy the requirements for overload protection? b) State the range of small overload that the circuit is not protected. c) To eliminate the undesired small overload, the circuit is upgraded to 4 x 25 mm2. Can this upgraded circuit be loaded up to 100% of its rated capacity? Why? 50A MCCB 4 x 10 mm2 /1C/Cu/PVC/NA, trunking IB = 49A, IZ = 50A Figure 3.8 Circuit for Example 3.7
  • 80. 68 Chapter 3 Solution (a) This circuit satisfies the two overload requirements : (i) From Table 4D1A of IEE Regulation [Ref. 2], IZ = 50 A. Since IN = 50 A, it satisfies IN < IZ. (ii) Since I2 = 1.30 x 50 = 65 A, and 1.45 IZ = 72.5 A, it satisfies I2 < 1.45 Iz. Thus, according to IEE Regulation 433 [Ref. 2], this circuit is provided with adequate protection against overload. We may also indicate by : OL_P_Yes = 100% x (1.45 IZ - I2 ) / 1.45 IZ = 10.3% (b) In this particular case, there is a range of small overloads for which it is not protected. Since the breaker will only trip at a current higher than 65 A and the cable rating is 50 A, the range of unprotected overload is therefore, from a load current higher than 50 A to less than 65 A. (c) The current rating of the 4 x 25 mm2 cable is 89 A. As this circuit is protected by a 50 A MCCB, which will trip at any current higher than 65 A, this circuit can only load up to : 73%100% 89 65 =× 3.5.2 Small Overloads and Cable Utilisation In Example 3.7, it is illustrated that if the rated cable capacity, Iz is equal to or slightly higher than the rating of the protective device, IN, it is possible to have a range of very small overloads which will not be detected by the protective device (i.e. at the range between IZ ≤ I ≤ I2). This condition exists even if the circuit is adequately protected against overload according to the IEE Regulations 433. Thus, in the general statement in IEE Regulation 433-01-01 [Ref. 2], it states that every circuit shall be designed so that a small overload of long duration is unlikely to occur. Similar to the definition of OL_P_Yes, we may define a percentage value to detect whether such small overload exists: Sm_OL_No ≡ 100% x (IZ – I2 ) / IZ
  • 81. Cable and Sizing of Conductors 69 A positive percentage in Sm_OL_No indicates that there is no un-detected small overload while a negative percentage means that such small overload range exists. Thus the designer should as far as possible minimize the negative percentage. Alternatively, the designer can simply increase the conductor size which will totally eliminate the occurrence of such small overloads. In fact, in Example 3.7, if the size of the conductor is increased from 4 x 10 mm2 to 4 x 16 mm2, the range of loading from 50 A to 65 A will not result in circuit overload since the current rating of the 4 x 16 mm2 circuit is 68A. We may also analyse using Sm_OL_No: Sm_OL_No10 mm = 100% x (50-65) / 50 = -30% Sm_OL_No16 mm = 100% x (68-65) / 68 = 4.4% The margin between IN and IZ should be carefully determined. If the value of IZ is very close to IN, the un-detected small overloads may occur. If the value of Iz is much higher than IN, then it implies a larger size of cable has been selected which will obviously increase the installation cost. In such arrangements, the cable may not be able to be loaded up to its rated capacity and thus the cable rating will not be fully utilised. 3.5.3 Omission of Overload Protection There are some circuits in which a break in current by the operation of protective devices can cause danger. For example, breaking the current of a lifting electromagnet could cause it to drop its load, or breaking the current in a current transformer could induce a very high e.m.f. In such situations, overload protection can be omitted, and if necessary, it can be replaced by an overload alarm. To cater for starting condition in designing a circuit for a motor, the designer has to ensure that the protective device of the motor circuit will not trip during motor starting. Thus, if the starting current is large, the rating of the protective device, IN, may have to be much higher than the design current, IB. To provide adequate overload protection, the current rating IZ of the cable has to be equal to or larger than IN. Thus, it will result in IN I and I IB Z〉〉 〉〉 B. In this arrangement, the size of the circuit will be larger than necessary. However, if overload protection is not required, then even if IN BI〉〉 , the designer can select IZ to be independent of IN, and IZ > IB.
  • 82. 70 Chapter 3 As a circuit for a motor is always connected through a starter with overload release, any overload in the motor that may occur will always be interrupted by the built-in overload release. Thus, the protective device of the motor circuit will not be required to provide overload protection. The functions of the protective device are not for overload protection but for switching of the circuit and to provide protection for short circuit that may occur in the circuit. If overload protection is required, the minimum tabulated current rating for the circuit is obtained by : iga N mint, CCC I I ×× = For motor circuit or any other circuit where overload protection is not required, the minimum tabulated current rating is [Ref. 2, P59, P177]: iga B mint, CCC I I ×× = Where the motor is intended for intermitted duty and for frequent stopping and starting, the conductor size shall be increased from 1.2 to 1.4 of the design current to cater for any cumulative effects of the starting periods upon the temperature rise in the circuit. Example 3.8 A motor which has a full load current of 188 A is fed by a multi-core pvc- insulated copper conductor cable installed in trunking at an ambient temperature of 350C. This circuit is protected by a MCCB as shown in Figure 3.9. Due to the high starting current, the current rating of the MCCB is 350 A. Determine the size of the cable under the assumptions that a) overload protection is not required, b) adequate overload protection should be provided. 350A MCCB 4C /Cu/PVC, trunking IFL = 188A, 35°C DOL M Figure 3.9 Circuit for Example 3.8 Solution (a) For no overload protection, the minimum tabulated current rating is :
  • 83. Cable and Sizing of Conductors 71 A200 1x194.0 188 CCC I I iga B mint, = × = ×× = From Table 4D2A of IEE Regulations [Ref. 2, P 190], column 5, a 120 mm2/4C cable which has a tabulated current rating of 206 A is selected. (b) To provide adequate protection against overload, A372 110.94 350 CCC I I iga N mint, = ×× = ×× = From the same Table 4D2A, column 5, a 400 mm2/4C cable which has a tabulated current rating of 402 A is selected. The current causing effective operation of the 350A MCCB is : I2 = 1.30 x 350 = 455 A 1.45 IZ = 1.45 x 402 x 0.94= 548 A Since I2 < 1.45 IZ, this circuit satisfies the required overload protection. It should be noted that under this condition, the conductor’s cross- sectional area of the circuit is increased to more than 3 times to meet the additional requirement of overload protection. 3.6 PROTECTION AGAINST SHORT CIRCUIT Calculations are necessary to ensure that the circuit conductors are protected adequately against the short-circuit current. Not only must the protective device open the circuit and interrupt the short-circuit current, it must do so quickly enough to prevent thermal damage to the cable. 3.6.1 Required Conditions for Short Circuit Protection During fault conditions up to a duration of 5 s, the maximum time in seconds that the cable can withstand the fault current can be approximated by the following formula : 2 F 22 max,cable I Sk t =
  • 84. 72 Chapter 3 The maximum time that the cable can withstand, Tcable, max , is also known as critical time, which is the time taken in seconds for the temperature of the conductors to rise from the rated value Q1 to the critical value QF. If the conductor temperature exceeds QF, the insulation material fails and the whole cable is thermally damaged. Thus, at the maximum short circuit current, the operating time of the protective device should be shorter than Tcable, max to isolate the fault current so that the conductor temperature will not exceed QF. The constant k represents the maximum thermal capacity of the conductor for the type of insulation being used, S is the cross-sectional area of the conductor in mm2 and IF is the prospective short-circuit current in amperes. For a duration of more than 5 s, a more complicated formula has to be used. To assess whether short-circuit protection is provided and how adequate it is, let us define: SC_P_Yes ≡ 100% x (tcable, max – tbk, 3-phase F ) / tcable, max where tbk, 3-phase F is the operating time of the breaker corresponding to a current during a 3-phase fault at the cable. The largest current that may flow through the cable occurs during a 3-phase fault. A positive percentage in SC_P_Yes indicates that the circuit meets the requirement for short- circuit protection and a higher percentage implies a higher margin of short- circuit protection. Obviously, if SC_P_Yes is a negative value, the circuit is not protected against short-circuit current. The value of k is a function of the conductor resistivity and its resistance- temperature coefficient, heat capacity of the conductor material, the rated conductor temperature Q1, and the critical temperature QF. Some typical values of k are given in Table 3.7. Table 3.7 Values of k for calculation of the effects of fault current Conductor Insulation Q1, 0 C QF, 0 C k Copper PVC 70 160 115 PVC * 70 140 103 PVC 30 160 143 PVC * 30 140 133 Rubber 85 220 134 XLPE 90 250 143 Aluminium PVC 70 160 76 PVC 30 160 95 Steel PVC 30 160 52 Bare Copper - 30 200 159 Bare Aluminium - 30 200 105 * for conductors larger than 300 mm2
  • 85. Cable and Sizing of Conductors 73 Example 3.9 A motor which has a full load current of 45 A, is fed by a four-core 10mm2 copper conductors, pvc-insulated cable installed in trunking and protected by a 100-A type B MCB which has a shortest operating time of 0.01 s. The three-phase short-circuit current is 5000 A as shown in Figure 3.10. Does this circuit provide adequate protection for overload? Does this circuit provide adequate protection for short-circuit? Why? 100A MCB 10mm2 /4C /Cu/PVC, trunking IFL = 45A , IZ = 46A, IF = 5000A DOL M Figure 3.10 Circuit for Example 3.9 Solution Since IB = 45 A, IN = 100 A, IZ = 46 A (from column 5 Table 4D2A of IEE Regulation), this circuit does not provide overload protection since IN is not < IZ and I2 is not < 1.45 IZ. For pvc-insulated cable, Q1 = 700C, Qf = 1600C and k = 115. To avoid thermal damage to the cable during fault condition, the MCB must operate and isolate the short-circuit current within the maximum time that the cable can withstand as follows : s0.0529 5000 10115 I Sk t 2 22 2 F 22 maxcable, = × == If the operating time of the MCB is specified as 0.01 s that is lower than the critical time of 0.0529 s, this circuit is therefore adequately protected for short circuit. Alternatively, we may verify by: OL_P_Yes = 100% x (66.7 - 145 ) / 66.7 = -117% SC_P_Yes = 100% x (0.0529 – 0.01 ) / 0.0529 = 81% The negative value of -117% indicates that the circuit fails for overload protection but passes the short-circuit protection at a margin of 81%. Example 3.10 A 4 x 10 mm2 circuit clipped directly on a non-metallic surface is protected by a 60-A MCCB which has a maximum operating time of 0.15 s as shown in
  • 86. 74 Chapter 3 Figure 3.11. The expected load current is 50 A while the short-circuit current is 4000 A. a) Explain why this circuit is not fully protected by overload protection. State the appropriate modifications to provide adequate overload protection. b) Explain why this circuit is not adequately protected against short- circuit and recommend the necessary remedial solution. c) If both the conductor size and the breaker operating time remain unchanged, what is the maximum short-circuit current that this circuit can withstand? 60A MCCB 4 x 10 mm2 /1C/Cu/PVC/NA, clipped direct IB = 50A, IF = 4000A Figure 3.11 Circuit for Example 3.10 Solution (a) (i) From Table 4D1A of IEE Regulation, column 7, the current rating of the 10 mm2 circuit is 59 A. Since IN = 60 A and IZ = 59 A, thus IN is not < IZ (ii) Since I2 = 1.30 x 60 = 78 A, and 1.45 IZ = 1.45 x 59 = 86 A, it satisfies I2 < 1.45 IZ. This circuit is not considered fully protected by overload, as it does not satisfy condition (i), although it does satisfy condition (ii). To provide adequate overload protection including small overloads, the minimum tabulated current rating of the circuit should be : It,min = 1.3 × 60 = 78A From table 4D1A of IEE Regulations [Ref. 2, P 188], column 7, the conductor size should be 4 x 16 mm2 which is rated at 79A. (b) second0827.0 4000 10115 I sk t 2 22 2 22 max,cable = × == Since the maximum operating time of the MCCB is 0.15 s which is larger than the critical time of 0.0827 s, the circuit does not provide adequate protection for thermal damage during short-circuit conditions. The
  • 87. Cable and Sizing of Conductors 75 conductor size should be increased from 10mm2 to a larger cross section as follows : 2Fphase,-3,bk min mm47.13 115 15.04000 k tI s === Thus, if adequate short-circuit protection is required, the conductor size should be equal to or greater than 13.47 mm2 and thus 16 mm2 is recommended. (c) For both the conductor size and the breaker operating time to remain unchanged, the maximum short-circuit current that this circuit can withstand is : A2969 15.0 10115 t kS I Fphase-3,bk max,F = × ×= Current (Amperes) Time (Seconds) 0.1 1 10 100 1,000 10,000 0.01 100 1,000 10,000 5 Safe 4 mm2 10 mm2 Safe Figure 3.12 The adiabatic equations 3.6.2 Adiabatic Equation The value of k is the same for cables that have the same type of conductor and insulation materials. If the cross-sectional area is also the same, then
  • 88. 76 Chapter 3 the product of k2S2 is a constant in the equation tcable, max = k2S2/I2. This equation can be rewritten as tcable, max = A1 / I2 where A1 is a constant which is equal to k2S2. Thus, a straight line known as adiabatic equation can be constructed on a log-log scale by substituting different values of I into the equation. The adiabatic equations of the 4 mm2 and 10 mm2 copper conductor, pvc-insulated cables are shown in Figure 3.12. Figure 3.13 Region of short-circuit protection This adiabatic equation can also be referred to as the time-current characteristic of the cable’s withstand capability. The region to the left of the adiabatic equation as shown in Figure 3.12 can be considered as a safe or adequately protected region since any protective device operating in this region will always cut-off the short-circuit current before the cable exceeds its thermal limit. The adiabatic equation of a 4 mm2 copper 100 1,000 10,000 0.1 1 100 1,000 10,000 10 0.001 010. 50A 4 mm2 50A MCB 2 × 4mm Cu / pvc / pvc2 ime (Seconds) Unprotected region Protected region T Region that is adequately protected Current (Amperes) Unprotected region
  • 89. Cable and Sizing of Conductors 77 conductor, pvc-insulated cable is superimposed with the time-current characteristic of a type 3, 50-A MCB as shown in Figure 3.13. It should be noted that for fault current from 500 A to 4600 A, the circuit is adequately protected since the operating time of the breaker is in the protected region, i.e. the breaker’s operating time is less than the critical time of the 4 mm2 cable. However, for current in the range from 206 A to 500 A or higher than 4600 A, the cable is not protected since the breaker’s operating time exceeds the critical time of the cable. For current below 206 A, the formula given in Section 3.6.1 is not applicable and thus whether the cable is protected or not is un-defined. If the type 3 MCB is replaced by a type 1 MCB, will the region of protection cover the range from 206 A to 500 A? Why? 3.6.3 Formulae for Short-circuit Currents Three-phase Fault. For 3-phase fault, the current magnitude in each phase is identical except that the angle is shifted by 1200 in each phase. Thus, the current in each phase during a 3-phase fault can be calculated by using an equivalent single phase approach as follows : ( ) ( )22 LL 3V 1S1S F,3 XXRR I +++ =φ where RS and XS are the per-phase values of the resistance and reactance of the supply source; R1 and X1 are the per-phase values of the resistance and reactance of the phase conductor and VLL is the line-to-line voltage. Line-to Neutral Fault. By using the same single phase approach, the line-to- neutral short-circuit current can be calculated as follows : ( ) ( )2 n 2 n LL LN X+R+ 3V 1S1S F, XXRR I +++ = where Rn and Xn are the values of resistance and reactance of the neutral conductor. Line-to-Line Fault. For a line-to-line fault, if the effect of the healthy phase is neglected, the fault current can be calculated as follows : ( ) ( )22 LL LL 22 V 1S1S F, X2XR2R I +++ =
  • 90. 78 Chapter 3 The values of the source resistance RS and reactance XS should be obtained from the supply utility or can be estimated from the impedance of the incoming transformer. The phase conductor’s resistance, R1 and reactance, X1, can be referred to the tabulated voltage drop constant, TVD. If the value of TVD is read from the 2-cable, single phase column, the value of the resistance can be obtained by multiplying 0.5 to TVDr and the value of reactance by 0.5 to TVDx. If the value of the TVD is read from the 3-or-4-cable, three phase column, the multiplication factor 1 3 is used instead of 0.5. The value of resistance obtained through TVD is based on a conductor temperature of 700C. During fault condition, the conductor temperature is higher than 700C and for more accurate calculation, temperature correction on the resistive value is required. A typical conductor temperature during fault conditions is normally obtained by taking the average of the rated conductor temperature Q1, and the critical conductor temperature OF i.e. (Q1+Qf)/2. If Q1 = 700C, and Qf = 1600C, the average conductor temperature is 1150C. Thus, the value of resistance at 1150C is : Ω Ω Ω115 70 70 230 115 230 70 = + + ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟ = × 1.15 Example 3.11 A 400 V, three-phase circuit is fed from a main distribution board where the source resistance RS is 0.02 Ω and the source reactance XS is 0.06 Ω. The circuit is run in single-core, non-armoured, pvc-insulated cable having copper conductors of 95 mm2 at a length of 15 m clipped direct and flat touching on a non-metallic surface as shown in Figure 3.14. Determine the three-phase short-circuit current and the line-to-neutral short circuit current. 4 × 95 mm2 /1C /Cu/PVC, Clipped direct 15mSupplying Source Rs = 0.02Ω Xs = 0.06Ω Figure 3.14 Circuit for Example 3.11 Solution From Table 4D1B of IEE Regulation [Ref. 2, P 189] or Table 9D1 of CP5 [Ref. 4] column 8, the tabulated voltage-drop constant for the 95 mm2 cable is (mV/A/m)r = 0.41 mΩ and (mV/A/m)x = 0.23 mΩ. Thus,
  • 91. Cable and Sizing of Conductors 79 Ω=× × Ω=×× × = − − 00199.010 3 150.23 =X C115at0041.015.110 3 1541.0 R 3 1 3 1 o The three-phase short-circuit current is : ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) °∠== +++ = +++ = 69-A2.3474 0665.0 9.230 00199.006.00041.002.0 3400 XXRR 3V I 22 2 1S 2 1S LL phase3,F The line-to-neutral short-circuit current is : ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) °∠== ×++×+ = +++++ = 66-A3303 0699.0 9.230 200199.006.020041.002.0 3400 XXXRRR 3V I 22 2 n1S 2 n1S LL LN,F 3.7 REFERENCES [1] BS 6346 : 1989, “PVC-insulated Cables for Electricity Supply”, British Standard Institution, 1989. [2] “Regulations for Electrical Installations”, 16th Edition, IEE, 1991. [3] BS 6004 : 1991, “PVC-insulated cables (non-armoured) for Electric Power and Lighting”, British Standard Institution, 1991. [4] CP5 : 1998, “Code of Practice for Electrical Installations”, Singapore Productivity and Standards Board, 1998 [5] BS 6207 : 1991, “Mineral-insulated Copper-sheaths Cables with Copper Conductors”, British Standard Institution, 1991. [6] IEEE Standard 141-1993, “IEEE Recommended Practice for Electric Power Distribution for Industrial Plants”, IEEE, 1993. [7] Marks T E, “Electrical Distribution in Buildings”, 2nd Edition, Blackwell Scientific Publications, UK, 1993.
  • 92. 80 CHAPTER 4 EARTHING AND EARTH FAULT PROTECTION The earth is a huge conductor which can be considered to be at reference or zero potential. Human beings are normally in direct contact with this earth. Any metal parts which become charged with respect to earth may cause a hazard or ‘electric shock’ if touched by a human body. The purpose of earthing is to link together all metalwork, except the live conductor, to the earth potential so that there is no excessive potential differences, either between different metal parts or between any metal parts and earth. In a three-phase a.c. system, the best way to obtain the system neutral for earthing purposes is to use generators or source transformers with Y- connected windings. The neutral is readily available for connection to earth and the earth fault current can then return to this system neutral or system earth. If such a system neutral is not available in the delta- connected system, earthing transformers may be used to obtain the neutral. 4.1 EARTHING IN A UTILITY SYSTEM Figure 4.1 shows the earthing arrangements in a typical 230-kV and 66-kV transmission system. In the 230-kV system, it is a solidly earthed system. The system earthing is implemented at the generating station C through the 13.2/230-kV generator step-up transformers and also at various locations in the main substations through the 230/66-kV transformers. Each generator step-up transformer has a delta-earthed wye connection and each 230/66-kV transformer has a earthed wye-delta-resistance earthed wye connection. Thus, during an earth fault in the 230-kV network, the fault current will have to return to the neutral of the 230-kV system at either the high-tension (HT) side of the generator step-up transformers or the HT side of the main 230/66-kV transformers. In this arrangement, the earth fault current will return to more than one location depending on the number of source transformers operated in parallel.
  • 93. Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 81 Figure 4.1 Transmission system earthing In the 66-kV system, it is earthed through a 19.5 Ω resistor at either the low-tension (LT) side of one 230/66-kV transformer at each main substation and/or the HT side of the 11/66-kV generator step-up transformers at the generating stations A and B. The connection of the 66- kV network through the 19.5 Ω resistor to earth will limit the earth-fault current to within 2000 A per source transformer, ie. : A1954 5.19 3/)1000x66( IEF == Local Distribution System (LDS) 19.5Ω19.5Ω 19.5Ω19.5Ω LDS Generating Station C Generating Station B 66 kV 66 kV 230 kV 230 kV Main Substation A Generating Station A 66 kV 66 kV 230 kV inMa Substation B LDS LDS LDS : open : close
  • 94. 82 Chapter 4 To limit the earth fault current, it is a normal practice to earth through only one 19.5 Ω resistor within each generating station and also only one 19.5 Ω resistor within each main 230/66-kV substation, although there may be several 230/66-kV transformers operated in parallel within each main substation. If the main substation A is interconnected with generating station B, during an earth fault in the 66-kV network, the earth fault current will return to the neutral of the 66-kV system through one 19.5 Ω resistor at generating station B and another 19.5 Ω resistor at the main substation A. In this case, the earth fault current will be limited to 4000 A as there are two 19.5Ω resistors operating in parallel. Figure 4.2 shows the earthing arrangement in a typical 22-kV distribution system. The neutral of the 22-kV system is earthed through one 6.5 Ω resistor at the 22-kV side of each 66/22-kV transformer. Each 66/22-kV distribution transformer is at an unearthed wye-delta-resistance earthed wye connection. Thus, during an earth fault in the 22-kV system, the earth- fault current will return through the resistance-earthed neutral. The connection of the 22-kV neutral through the 6.5 Ω resistor to earth will also limit the earth fault current to within 2000 A per source transformer: ( ) A1954 5.6 3100022 IEF = × = The 66/22-kV transformers are generally operated with two transformers in parallel at each substation. Thus the maximum earth fault current under this operating condition will be 4000 A, since there are two 6.5-Ω resistors operating in parallel. At substations C, D and E, the 22/0.4-kV transformer is at a delta-earthed wye connection. Thus, during an earth fault in the low-voltage (LV) system, the earth fault current will return to the respective earthed neutral. As the neutral is solidly earthed, the earth fault current in each LV system will be considerably higher. It should be noted that by properly arranging the earthing system at each voltage level, the magnitude of the earth-fault current can be controlled to an acceptable level. Furthermore, the earth fault currents at various voltage levels would never ‘mix-up’ and they can always find their own paths and return to their designated ‘homes’ (i.e. their respective earthing neutrals). Thus, it makes sensitive and high-speed earth-fault protection possible based on the detection of the earth-current flow.
  • 95. Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 83 4.2 METHODS OF SYSTEM EARTHING An electric system can also be designed as an unearthed system, i.e. with the neutral of the system isolated from earth. During a line-to-earth fault, as the neutral of the system is unearthed, no fault current will flow from the system. The advantage of such an unearthed system is its ability to continue operations during a line-to-ground fault. It will not result in the automatic tripping of the circuit. Thus, the unearthed system offers an added degree of service continuity. E C A LV 22 kV 22 kV 22 kV 66 kV Distribution Substation A 6.5Ω LV LV D B 22 kV 22 kV 66 kV Distribution Substation B 6.5Ω LV LV : open : close Figure 4.2 Distribution system earthing However, as the system is unearthed and no fault current flows during a line-to-ground fault, the faulty phase will then take the earth voltage. As a result, the magnitude of the voltage between each healthy line to earth is equal to the line-to-line voltage. This causes a rise in voltage on the other two healthy phases of approximately 3 of the voltage between each
  • 96. 84 Chapter 4 phase to ground. In other words, the other two phase conductors throughout the entire system are subjected to 73% overvoltage. This additional voltage stress may produce insulation breakdown in the circuits, especially machine windings and other voltage sensitive equipment. Furthermore, due to the capacitance effect from the two healthy phases to ground, a capacitive current will flow from these two phases through their insulation to ground and return to the system neutral by way of the fault. This is, in fact, similar to a capacitance grounded system and it may have an intermittent arcing at the faulty location. As a result, the ungrounded system is subjected to a transient overvoltage which may cause a further fault to occur. Thus, most of the electrical systems employ some methods of earthing the system neutral at one or more points. The common methods are resistance earthing, reactance earthing or solid earthing [Ref 1]. Singapore’s practice requires that one point of every system shall be earthed. This requirement is designed primarily to preserve the security of the system by ensuring that the potential on each conductor is restricted to such a value as is consistent with the level of insulation applied. From the safety point of view, it is equally important that earthing should ensure efficient and fast operation of protective gears in the case of earth faults [Ref 2, P 11]. Resistance - Earthed Systems In a resistance-earthed system, the system neutral is connected to earth through one or more resistors. In this method, the resistance is actually in parallel with the system-to-ground capacitive reactance. The value of the resistance should be selected in such a way that this parallel circuit behaves more like a resistor than a capacitor. Resistance earthing can be of high-resistance earthing or low-resistance earthing depending on the magnitude of the earth-fault current permitted to flow. Both methods are designed to limit the transient overvoltages due to the effect of the capacitive earthing during a line-to-earth short- circuit. In the high-resistance earthing, the earth fault current is limited to 5 A and it may not require the immediate clearing of a ground fault. For low resistance earthing, the earth fault current is in the range from 100 A to 2000 A. Due to the low resistance value, the line-to-earth voltage can be better controlled and sufficient earth fault current is available to operate the earth fault relay selectively.
  • 97. Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 85 Reactance - Earthed Systems In a reactance-earthed system, the system neutral is connected to earth through a reactor. In terms of reducing the transient overvoltage, it is not as effective as resistance earthing. Thus, a reactance earthing system is not ordinarily employed in industrial power systems. Solidly Earthed Systems A solidly earthed system refers to the connection of the neutral of a generator or transformer directly to earth. Thus, it totally eliminates the overvoltage in the two healthy phases during a line-to-ground fault. However, it will result in the highest magnitudes of earth-fault current. Although each earthing system has its own advantages, solidly earthed systems are used extensively at all operating voltages. 4.3 EARTHING IN LOW-VOLTAGE SYSTEMS For low-voltage system earthing, IEE Regulations [Ref 3] define an electrical system as consisting of a single source of supply and an installation. System earthing refers to the earthing arrangement at the source of energy and at the installation. There are five types of earthing systems classified by a combination of two to four letters namely TT, TN- S, TN-C, TN-C-S and IT. The first letter indicates the supply earthing arrangement: T: Earth, i.e. one or more points of the supply are directly connected to earth. The letter T is abbreviated from the French word Terre, which means earth. I: Impedance, i.e. supply system is not earthed, or one point is earthed through a fault-limiting impedance. The second letter indicates the installation earthing arrangement: T: Earth, i.e. exposed conductive parts connected directly to earth. N: Neutral, i.e. exposed conductive part connected directly to the neutral point of the source of supply. The optional third or fourth letter indicates the earthing conductor arrangement: S: Separate, i.e. separate neutral and protective conductors. C: Combined, i.e. neutral and protective conductor combined in a single conductor.
  • 98. 86 Chapter 4 4.3.1 Installation Earthing All metalwork of an electrical installation, other than parts which are normally live, should be connected to a main earthing terminal. The main earthing terminal shall be connected to earth by an appropriate earthing method [Ref 3, P 92]. Effective earthing of each exposed-conductive-part of the installation is essential for protection against electric shock. This type of earthing should be arranged to meet the following two objectives : (a) to maintain, as close as practicable, the exposed-conductive-parts at earth potential. (b) to ensure that any earth fault current will be returned safely to its source via a properly designed low-impedance path. The earthing arrangements shall be co-ordinated so that during an earth fault, the voltages between simultaneously accessible exposed-conductive- parts and extraneous-conductive-parts occurring anywhere in the installation shall be of such magnitude and duration as not to cause danger [Ref 2, P 35]. A typical earthing arrangement of an installation is shown in Figure 4.3. Exposed-Conductive-Part The exposed-conductive-part refers to any metallic part of electrical equipment which can be touched and which is not a live part but may become live under fault conditions. These include the metallic enclosures of Class I current-using equipment, metallic cable sheaths, cable trays, trunkings and metallic conduits. Class I equipment refers to those equipment in which protection against electric shock does not rely on basic insulation only, but which includes means for the connection of exposed- conductive-parts to a protective conductor. Extraneous-Conductive-Part The extraneous-conductive-part is a conductive part liable to introduce a potential, generally earth potential and not forming part of the electrical installation. It includes non-electrical service pipes and ducting, such as water pipes, HVAC ducting, exposed metallic structural parts in buildings, and lightning protection system. It is quite likely that a person could be in simultaneous contact with an exposed-conductive-part (which may be made live by an earth fault) and a nearby extraneous-conductive-part.
  • 99. Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 87 Figure 4.3 Earthing arrangement of an Installation Circuit Protective Conductor A circuit protective conductor (CPC) is usually known as earth continuity conductor or ‘earth wire’ which connects the exposed-conductive-parts of the current-using equipment to the respective distribution boards and from each distribution board to the main earthing terminal of an installation as shown in Figure 4.3. CPC forms part of the earth fault loop impedance and M DB Earthing Terminal Earth Electrode Earthing Conductor Switchboard Earthing Terminal Main Earthing Terminal Exposed- Conductive- Part CPC CPC CPC CPC Extraneous-conductive-part Main Equipotential Bonding Conductor
  • 100. 88 Chapter 4 will carry the earth fault current in the event of an earth fault. The cross- sectional area of every protective conductor, other than an equipotential bonding conductor, shall be calculated in accordance with the following formula [Ref. 3, P 94], [Ref. 8, P 119] : k tI S Iefbk,EF ≥ where : S is the minimum cross-sectional area of the protective conductor in mm2, IEF is the earth fault current in amperes, tbk,Ief is the operating time of the protective device in seconds corresponding to the earth fault current IEF and k is the thermal capacity constant of the CPC. The values of k are given in Section 3.6. Alternatively, the size of CPC can also be determined based on the size of the phase conductor in accordance with Table 4.1[Ref.3, P97]. Table 4.1 Size of CPC in Relation to the Size of Phase Conductor Phase conductor size (S), mm2 Minimum CPC size, mm2 S ≤ 16 S 16 < S ≤ 35 16 S > 35 S / 2 Equipotential Bonding Conductor Bonding refers to tying together the exposed-conductive-parts and the extraneous-conductive-parts. It is vital in order to minimise any potential differences that might exist between them during an earth-fault. The main equipotential bonding conductor refers to the conductor connecting from the extraneous-conductive-part to the main earthing terminal to create an earthed equipotential zone. 4.3.2 TT System In the TT system, the source of supply is directly earthed (T) and the the installation’s earthing terminal, which is connected to the exposed- conductive-parts, is also directly earthed (T) through its own earth electrode. The earthing at the source of supply is independent of the earthing at the installation. This arrangement is shown in Figure 4.4. The main feature of this system is that there is no continuous metallic path between the exposed-conductive-parts and the neutral of the source. The earth-fault current flows via two earth electrodes and the mass of the earth. The earth fault current is :
  • 101. Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 89 TTEFL, LL ABCPC1ES LL TTEF, Z 3V RRRRZZ 3V I = +++++ = Where : Zs is the source impedance (i.e. RS + jXS ), ZE is the phase conductor impedance external to the installation (i.e. RE +jXE.), R1 is the phase conductor resistance of the installation, RCPC is the resistance of the circuit protective conductor, and RB and RB A are the resistances of the earthing conductor and the earth electrode at the installation and at the source of supply respectively. ZEFL,TT is the earth fault loop impedance in the TT system: ZEFL,TT = (RS +RE + R1 +RCPC + RB +RB A ) +j(XS +XE) Main Equipotential Bonding Conductor Extraneous-conductive-part Rcpc Exposed- Conductive- Part Installation Earthing Terminal Supply Earthing Terminal earth R1 RB RA ZS ZE earth Figure 4.4 TT System As shown in Figure 4.4, at the installation’s earthing terminal, the exposed- conductive-parts and the extraneous-conductive-parts are connected together to provide an equipotential reference. Thus, during an earth fault, the voltage at the exposed-conductive-parts, with respect to earth (usually known as touch voltage or shock voltage), is: Vshock, TT,Yes = IEF,TT x RCPC If, however, an equipotential zone is not created, i.e. without the main equipotential bonding, the touch voltage is: Vshock, TT,No = IEF,TT x (RCPC + RB)
  • 102. 90 Chapter 4 Obviously, the shock voltage without the equipotential zone, Vshock, TT,No, is much higher than the shock voltage with the equipotential zone Vshock,TT,Yes. 4.3.3 TN-S System In the TN-S system, the source of supply is directly earthed (T) and the exposed-conductive-parts connected to the installation’s earthing terminal is earthed at the neutral point (N) of the supply source through a separate (S) protective conductor as shown in Figure 4.5. The main feature of this system is that there is a continuous metallic path from the exposed- conductive-part to the neutral of the source and therefore, it usually results in a higher earth fault current. The earth fault current is also high enough to operate overcurrent protective devices. The earth fault current can be calculated by : TN,EFL LL pccpc1ES LL TN,EF Z 3V ZZZZZ 3V I = ++++ = where Z1, ZCPC and ZPC are the impedances of the phase conductor, the CPC, and the protective conductor respectively. The impedance of the protective conductor depends on the distance from the installation to the source of supply, but in general, ZEFL,TN is very much lower than ZEFL,TT mainly due to the values of RA and RB associated with the TT system. As a result, the earth fault current in a TN system will be much higher. B Main Equipotential Bonding Conductor Extraneous-conductive-part Exposed- Conductive- Part Supply Earthing Terminal Installation Earthing Terminal earth Zcpc Zpc Z1 RA ZS ZE earth Figure 4.5 TN-S system
  • 103. Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 91 The shock voltages in the TN system with and without equipotential bonding are: Vshock,TN,Yes = IEF,TN x ZCPC Vshock,TN,No = IEF,TN x (ZCPC + ZPC) for sustained fault, or = Ia x (ZCPC + ZPC) if the breaker trips at a current of Ia) 4.3.4 TN-C-S System The TN-C-S system is similar to the TN-S system, i.e. the source of supply is earthed (T) and the installation’s earthing terminal is earthed at the neutral point (N) of the supply source. However, the separate (S) protective conductor is subsequently combined (C) with the neutral conductor at the installation’s incoming supply terminal as shown in Figure 4.6. However, this type of system is not implemented in Singapore. earth Installation Earthing Terminal RA CPC RPCN ZS ZE R1 Figure 4.6 TN-C-S System 4.3.5 TN-C and IT Systems TN-C system is similar to the TN-S system except that the separate protective conductor that connects the installation’s earthing terminal to the source’s neutral (N) is combined (C) with neutral conductor. In this system, RCCBs cannot be used as they will not detect an earth fault. TN-C system is also not implemented in Singapore.
  • 104. 92 Chapter 4 An IT system is normally not permitted on the low-voltage systems. The source of supply is either completely isolated (I) from earth, or is earthed through a high impedance. However, the installation’s earthing terminal is directly earthed (T) through its own electrode. The IT system is also not implemented in Singapore. 4.4 EARTH FAULT PROTECTION The earth fault protection for low-voltage systems is based on the protection against indirect contact for electric shock. It is dependent on the protection by earthed equipotential bonding and automatic disconnection of supply as stated in IEE Regulation 413-02 [Ref 3, P 31]. The disconnection of supply applies to any circuit including distribution circuits and final circuits in which an earth fault may occur. The characteristics of each protective device, the earthing arrangements and the relevant impedance of the circuit shall be co-ordinated so that during an earth fault, the touch voltage (i.e. the potential differences between simultaneously accessible exposed and extraneous-conductive-parts) occurring anywhere in the installation shall be of such magnitude and duration as not to cause danger[Ref. 2, P35]. The human body is composed largely of water and has very low resistance. The skin, however, if it is not wet or burnt, has a much higher resistance. Thus, most of the resistance to the passage of current through the body is at the points of entry and exit through the skin. The average values of body impedance are in the range from 1000 to 3000 ohms. [Ref. 4, P19]. Based on an average human impedance of 2000 ohms, the current that passes through the human body is 115 mA for a touch voltage of 230 V, or 25 mA for a touch voltage of 50 V. As reported by IEC [Ref. 4, P39], for an a.c. current from 15 to 100 Hz, the human body can withstand 30 mA for 5 s or 100 mA for 0.5 s. Thus, the criterion in determining the disconnection time of protective devices for protection against electric shock is usually based on a touch voltage of 230 V for 0.4 s or 50V for 5 s. 4.4.1 Protection on TN System According to IEE Regulations 413-02-06 to 413-02-17 [Ref. 3, P31], for an installation which is part of a TN system, each exposed-conductive-part shall be connected to the main earthing terminal which shall be connected to the earth point of the supply source. One or both of the following two types of protective devices shall be used : (a) an overcurrent protective device, (b) a residual current device.
  • 105. Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 93 Protection Provided by an Overcurrent Device During an earth fault, the characteristics of each protective device and the earth fault loop impedance, ZEFL,TN, of each circuit protected by it should be such that automatic disconnection of the supply will occur within a specified time and should satisfy : a LL TN,EFL I 3V Z ≤ where : ZEFL,TN is the earth fault loop impedance, VLL / 3 is the rated line- to-earth voltage and Ia is the current causing the automatic operation of the protective device within the specified time. (i) Hand-held equipment at 0.4 s. For final circuit which supplies socket outlets or hand-held Class I equipment (defined in the sub-heading: exposed-conductive-parts in Section 4.3.1), the maximum disconnection time should be specified according to the rated line-to-earth voltage as shown in Table 4.2 [Ref. 3, P 32]. Table 4.2 Disconnection Time for TN Systems Voltage (V) Time in seconds 220 - 277 0.4 400 0.2 >400 0.1 The maximum earth fault loop impedances corresponding to a list of overcurrent protective devices which can achieve the required disconnection time of 0.4 s are stated in Tables 41B1 and 41B2 of the IEE Wiring Regulations [Ref 3, P 33]. The impedances, ZEFL,TN,MAX, in these tables are obtained by : s0.4atoperatedcurrentEffective Voltageearth-to-lineRated Z max,TN,EFL = For example, if the overcurrent protective device is a 32-A type C MCB, the operating time is 5 s for a current less than 320 A and 0.04 s for any current equal to or greater than 320 A. Thus, the current causing the MCB to operate at 0.4 s is 320 A and the corresponding maximum earth fault loop impedance is : Ω== 75.0 320 240 Z C,MCB,A32max,,TN,EFL The value of 0.75 Ω is identical to those listed in Table 41B2(h) of IEE Regulations [Ref. 3, P 33]. For MCBs, as they are operated by the
  • 106. 94 Chapter 4 electromagnetic tripping, the operating time is in the range from 0.01 s to 0.1 s, although the required operating time is 0.4 s. If the rated line-to-earth voltage is 230 V, then Ω== 719.0 320 230 Z C,MCB,A32max,,TN,EFL (ii) Fixed equipment at 5 s. For a distribution circuit, or a final circuit supplying only stationary equipment, a disconnection time not exceeding 5 s is permitted. [Ref 3, P 35] (iii) Optional disconnection time at 5 s. Irrespective of the value of the line-to-earth voltage for a final circuit which supplies a socket-outlet or portable hand-held class I equipment, and which is within the earthed equipotential zone, the disconnection time is permissible to increase to a value not exceeding 5 s, if the impedance of CPC is less than a value given in Table 41C of the IEE Regulations [Ref 3, P 34]. The maximum impedances of the CPC corresponding to a list of overcurrent protective devices listed in Table 41C are obtained by : 5satoperatedcurrentEffective V50 Z ,maxTN,CPC = If the overcurrent protective device is a 32-A BS 88 fuse and the current causing the fuse to operate at 5 s is 125 A, the maximum impedance allowed of the CPC is : Ω== 40.0 125 V50 Z fuse,A32max,,TN,CPC If the overcurrent protective device is a 32-A type 3 or type C MCB, and the current causing the MCB to operate at 5 s is 320 A, the maximum impedance allowed for the CPC is : Ω== 16.0 320 50 Z C,MCB,A32max,,TN,CPC The values of 0.4 Ω and 0.16 Ω are identical to those values listed in Table 41C (a) and (h) of IEE Regulations [Ref. 3, P 34, 35] respectively. Protection Provided by a Residual Current Device If the protection is provided by a RCCB, the following condition shall be satisfied : ZEFL,TN x IΔN ≤ 50 V
  • 107. Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 95 where : ZEFL,TN is the earth fault loop impedance and I∇N is the rated residual operating current of the RCCB in amperes. 4.4.2 Protection on TT System According to IEE Regulation 413-02-18 to 413-02-20, for an installation which is part of a TT system, every exposed-conductive-part shall be connected via the main earthing terminal to a common earth electrode. One or both of the following protective devices shall be used: (a) a residual current device, (b) an overcurrent protective device. In the TT system, the earth fault loop impedance is usually higher than the TN system and thus, the earth fault current may not be high enough to operate the overcurrent protective device in time to disconnect the circuit. Thus, in this system, the use of RCCB is preferred. In addition, the shock voltage shall be limited to not more than 50 V by satisfying the following conditions : RaIa < 50 V where : Ra is the sum of the resistances of the earth electrode, earthing conductor and the CPC connecting to the exposed-conductive-part. Ia is the current causing the automatic operation of the protective device within 5 s. If the protective device is a RCCB, Ia is the rated residual operating current IΔN. As the value of Ra includes the resistance of the earthing conductor and the earth electrode ( RB), the calculated touch voltage is actually based on an installation without the main equipotential bonding. The shock voltage is calculated by : B Vshock,TT,No = Ia,TT × Ra = Ia,TT × (RCPC + RB)B If the main equipotential bonding has been installed, the shock voltage is: Vshock,TT,Yes = Ia,TT × (RCPC), or = IEF,TT × (RCPC) if protective device does not operate It is obvious that Vshock,TT,Yes < Vshock,TT,No and thus, the shock voltage will be lower than 50 V if the calculation is based on Vshock,TT,No. However, it should be noted that although the value of RCPC is always within 1 Ω [Ref. 2, P 43], the earth electrode resistance may be as high as 5 Ω for most locations [Ref. 5, P 28]. A detailed calculation of earth fault current and shock voltage [Ref. 7] using a full three-phase representation for both TT and TN-S systems are given in Appendix C.
  • 108. 96 Chapter 4 4.5 APPLICATION EXAMPLES Example 4.1 In part of a TN-S system, the supply to a final DB is fed from a 22/0.4 kV transformer via a main DB as shown in Figure 4.7. The main circuit from the transformer to the main DB is a multicore, pvc-insulated, copper conductor cable of 120 mm2 with a separate protective conductor of 70 mm2 , pvc-insulated copper conductor cable. The sub-circuit from the main DB to the final DB is a twin-core, pvc-insulated, copper conductor cable of 35 mm2 with a separate CPC of 6 mm2 , pvc-insulated copper conductor cable. The transformer has a resistance of 0.002 Ω and a reactance of 0.008 Ω with respect to the voltage of 400V. During fault condition, it is assumed that the temperatures of the 35 mm2 phase conductor and the 6 mm2 CPC are 1150 C and 950 C respectively, and that the 120 mm2 phase conductor and the 70 mm2 CPC are 700 C and 300 C respectively. (a) Determine the earth fault loop impedance at the final DB and the earth fault current for a line-to-earth short circuit inside the final DB. (b) Is the CPC size of 6 mm2 appropriate? Why? 200A Main DB MCCB (main circuit) (sub-circuit) Cu/PVC, tray, 30m 120mm2 /4C + 70mm2 (CPC) XT = 0.008Ω RT = 0.002Ω Cu/PVC, trunking, 20m 35mm2 / 2C+ 6mm2 (CPC) Final DB Figure 4.7 Installation for Example 4.1 Solution (a) From Table 4D2B(columns 3, 4) of IEE Regulations [Ref. 3, P 191]: 120 mm2 : (mV/A/m)r = 0.33 mΩ, (mV/A/m)x = 0.135 mΩ 70 mm2 : (mV/A/m)r=0.63 mΩ, (mV/A/m)x = 0.160 mΩ 35 mm2 : (mV/A/m)r = 1.25 mΩ, (mV/A/m)x = 0.165 mΩ 6 mm2 : (mV/A/m)r = 7.3 mΩ, (mV/A/m)x = 0 Ω
  • 109. Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 97 0=X0.079= 70)+1000(2302 95)+20(2307.3 =R 0.0017= 10002 200.165 =X0.0144= 70)+1000(2302 115)+20(2301.25 =R 0.0024= 10002 300.16 =X 0.0082 70)+1000(2302 30)+30(2300.63 R 0.0023 10003 300.135 =X0.0057 10003 300.33 R 66 3535 70 70 120120 Ω × × Ω × × Ω × × Ω × × Ω= × × = Ω= × × Ω= × × = Ω= ++++++++= 0.1102 )XXX(X)RRRR(RZ 2 T3570120 2 T63570120TNEFL, The line-to-earth short-circuit current is : A2087 1102.0 230 I TN,EF == (b) For an earth fault current of 2087 A, the operating time of the MCB in the final DB is estimated at 0.1 s . Thus the minimum size of CPC is: 2 22 TN,EF min mm62.4 143 1.02087 k tI S = × =≥ The CPC size of 6 mm2 is appropriate since it is greater than the minimum required size of 4.62 mm2. Example 4.2 An installation which is part of a TT system has a final circuit with a length of 20 m for socket-outlets. This circuit is a single-core, pvc-insulated copper conductor cable of 4 mm2 with a separate CPC of the same size as shown in Figure 4.8. The CPC from the final DB to the main earthing terminal is 16 mm2 at 30 m and the earthing conductor from the earthing terminal to the earth electrode is 25 mm2 at 10 m. All the CPCs are single- core pvc-insulated copper conductors and the earth electrode resistance is 0.9 Ω. The protective device for the final circuit can be selected from a 32-A type 1 MCB, a 32-A type C MCB or a 63-A RCCB with a residual operating current of 0.03 A. Temperature correction on cable resistive value is not required. (a) To satisfy the protection for electric shock, suggest the appropriate type of protective devices for the final circuit to the socket outlets.
  • 110. 98 Chapter 4 (b) State the differences if the same installation is part of a TN-S system in which the external earth fault loop impedance RE + jXE from the final DB and the earthing terminal to the source of supply is (0.3 +j0.6) Ω. 32A MCB 1x25mm2 Cu/PVC, clipped direct to Socket-outlets 1x16mm2 Cu/PVC trunking, 20m 1x4mm2 Cu/PVC (CPC)2x4mm2 Cu/PVC, 63A clipped direct, 30m 10m CPC Earth Electrode RB = 0.9Ω Earthing conductor Final DB Earthing Terminal RCCB Figure 4.8 Installation for Example 4.2 Solution (a) From Table 4D1B (columns 3,4) of IEE Regulations [Ref. 3, P 189], 4 mm2 : (mV/A/m)r = 11 mΩ 16 mm2 : (mV/A/m)r = 2.8 mΩ 25 mm2 : (mV/A/m)r = 1.75 mΩ ΩΩ= × × = Ω= × × = =Ω= × × = 0.9=R0.009 10002 101.75 R 0.042 10002 302.8 R RR0.11 10002 2011 R B25 cpc,16 4CPC4,4 For TT system, the condition to satisfy the requirement for the protection against electric shock is to limit the shock voltage to not more than 50 V as follows : Ra Ia < 50 V
  • 111. Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 99 where Ia is the current causing the automatic operation of the protection device within 5 s. Ra = R4,cpc + R16,cpc + R25 + RB = 1.061 ΩB A1.47 061.1 50 Ia == The operating times of the 32-A MCB for both type 1 and type C are 1000 s for a current of 47.1 A. As this disconnection time exceeds 5 s, both type 1 and type C MCBs do not provide adequate protection against electric shock. However, as the operating time of the RCCB is 0.04 s for a current of 47.1 A, it gives adequate protection for electric shock. (b) If the same installation is part of a TN-S system, the earth fault loop impedance is : Ω= ++++= ++++= 0.822 6.0)3.0042.011.011.0( )X()RRRR(Z 22 2 E 2 Ecpc16,cpc4,4TNEFL, The line-to-earth fault current is : A280 822.0 230 I TN,EF == The operating time of the 32-A type 1 MCB is within 0.1 s but for the type C MCB, it is slightly more than 5 s. Thus, only type 1 MCB and the RCCB can satisfy the requirements for protection against electric shock if the same installation is part of a TN-S system. Example 4.3 A 230-V supply to an electric heater utilises a circuit of pvc-insulated copper conductor cable of 6 mm2, protected by a 40-A MCB with a CPC size of 4 mm2. The length of the cable is 18 m and the CPC is bundled together with the phase conductors as shown in Figure 4.9. It is assumed that a type B MCB is first installed and then it may be replaced by a type C MCB subsequently during maintenance. If the external earth fault loop impedance RE +jXE is (0.12 + j0.8)Ω, determine whether the size of 4 mm2 CPC can satisfy the electric shock protection as well as the thermal constraint. Temperature correction on cable resistive value is required.
  • 112. 100 Chapter 4 clipped direct, 18m40A Heater MCB RE = 0.12Ω XE = 0.8Ω 2×6mm2 1C/Cu/PVC, 1×4mm2 (CPC) Figure 4.9 Circuit for Example 4.3 Solution Assume that the average temperature for both phase conductors and the CPC during the fault is (70+160)/2 = 1150C. From Table 4D1B column 4) of IEE Regulations [Ref 3, P 189], 6 mm2 : (mV/A/m)r = 7.3 mΩ 4 mm2 : (mV/A/m)r = 11 mΩ The resistive values for the 6 mm2 cable and the 4 mm2 cable at an assumed conductor temperature of 1150C are : Ω=×⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ + + ×= Ω=×⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ + + ×= 0.1139 1000 18 70230 115230 2 11 R 0.0756 1000 18 70230 115230 2 7.3 R 4 6 The earth fault loop impedance is : ( ) ( ) 0.858 0.80.120.11390.0756 XRRRZ 22 2 E 2 E46TNEFL, Ω= +++= +++= The line-to-earth fault current is : A268 858.0 230 I TN,EF == As the disconnection time for heater (fixed equipment) is within 5s and from Table 2.2, the current causing the type B 40-A MCB to operate within 5 s is 200 A and for type C, is 400 A. Thus, the corresponding maximum earth fault loop impedances are : Ω= Ω= 575.0 400 230 =Z 15.1 200 230 =Z CtypeA,max,40TN,EFL, BtypeA,40max,,TN,EFL
  • 113. Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 101 Since ZEFL,TN is 0.858Ω, which is lower than ZEFL,TN,max,40A,typeB (1.15 Ω), it satisfies the requirements for protection against electric shock. However, since ZEFL,TN is higher than ZEFL,TN,max,40A,typeC (0.575 Ω), the type C MCB fails to meet the requirements. In other words, the disconnection time of the 40-A type C MCB exceeds 5 s. For an earth fault current of 268 A, the operating time of the type B MCB is 0.1 s (from Table 2.2), and for type C, 8 s (from Figure 2.9). To satisfy the thermal constraint, the minimum cross-sectional areas of the CPCs for type B and type C MCBs are : 2 22 Ctypemin, 2 22 Btypemin, mm6.59 115 8268 k tI =S mm0.737 115 0.1268 k tI S = × = = × == Thus, by using type B MCB, the CPC of 4 mm2 satisfies the thermal constraint since it only requires a minimum size of 0.737 mm2. For type C MCB, however, the CPC size of 4 mm2 is not adequate since the required minimum size is 6.59 mm2. This application example illustrates that the design engineer should not select CPC according to the minimum requirement of the type B MCB, as type C MCB may be replaced during maintenance. Example 4.4 Use the same details as for Example 4.3, except that the CPC is separated with the phase conductors and the protective device is a 63-A RCCB with a rated residual current of IΔ N at 0.03 A. This RCCB operates at 0.04 s at a residual current of 5 IΔ N. (a) Is the size of CPC acceptable based on the thermal constraint and the electric shock constraint? (b) If an intentional time delay is introduced, determine the maximum time delay which can satisfy both the thermal constraint and electric shock constraint. Solution (a) Since the operating current of the RCCB is 5 x 0.03 = 0.15 A at 0.04 s and the line-to-earth fault current IEF,TN is 268 A (calculated in Example 4.3), the RCCB will operate within 0.04 s which satisfies the requirements for electric shock protection.
  • 114. 102 Chapter 4 The maximum disconnection time based on the thermal limit of the CPC of 4 mm2 is : s4.56 268 4143 I Sk t 2 22 2 22 maxcable, TNEF, = × == As the CPC is separated with the phase conductor, the temperature before the fault is 300 C and thus the value of k is 143 instead of 115 as in Example 4.3 where the temperature before the fault is 700 C. Since the operating time of the RCCB is 0.04 s which is lower than 4.56 s, it satisfies the requirement for the thermal constraint. (b) Based on the thermal limit of the CPC of 4 mm2, the maximum time delay for the RCCB is : 4.56 - 0.04 = 4.52 s Based on the requirement for electric shock protection, the maximum time delay is : 5 - 0.04 = 4.96 s Example 4.5 For a 3-phase 4-wire system, draw a schematic diagram of an earth fault protection scheme for a 500-A MCCB using one IDMT relay. It is required to isolate an earth fault current of 50 A within 3 seconds. Determine the number of current transformers (CT), CT ratio and the relay’s plug setting (PS) and the time multiplier setting (TMS). The maximum earth fault current of the installation is 400 A. Solution The schematic diagram for earth fault protection for a MCCB is shown in Figure 4.10. The earth fault relay operates by detecting the vector sum of the red, yellow, blue and neutral currents. Thus, four CTs are required. The CT ratio is 500/5 since the MCCB is rated at 500 A. As it is required to detect an earth fault current of 50 A, the plug setting should be 10% since the CT ratio is 500/5. The relay constant M corresponding to a maximum earth fault current of 400 A can be calculated by : 8 10500 100400 PSCT 100I M EF = × × = × × = The operating time of the relay [Ref. 6, P 139] is : TMS 1M 14.0 t 02.0 × − =
  • 115. Earthing and Earth Fault Protection 103 500A B Y R N EFST Figure 4.10 Schematic diagram for earth fault protection If this relay has to operate within 3 seconds, the value of t is 3 in the above equation, and thus : ( ) ( ) 3 0.14 8 1 TMS TMS 3 8 1 0.14 3 1.042 1 0.14 0.9 0.02 0.02 = − × = × − = × − = In other words, for a CT ratio of 500/5 and for a 10% plug setting, the earth fault relay will activate at an earth fault current of 500 x 0.1 = 50 A. If the relay’s TMS setting is 0.9, the relay will operate at 3 seconds for an earth fault current of 400 A. 4.6 REFERENCES [1] IEEE Std 142-1991, “IEEE Recommended Practice for Grounding of Industrial and Commercial Power System”, IEEE, 1991. [2] CP16 : 1991, “Code of Practice for Earthing”, SISIR, 1991. [3] “IEE Regulations for Electrical Installations”, 16th Edition, IEE, UK, 1991. [4] IEC 479-1 Technical Report, “ Effects of Current on Human Beings and Livestock, Part 1”, International Electrotechnical Commision, 1994. [5] IEE Guidance Notes No.5, “Guidance Notes on Protection against Electric Shock”, IEE, UK, 1992 [6] GEC, “Protective Relays Application Guide”, GEC Measurements, UK, 1987. [7] Teo C Y, He W X, Chan T W,“ A Phase Co-ordinate Approach to Calculate Earth-fault Current and Shock Voltage”, IEE proceedings on Electric Power Applications, Vol. 144, No. 6, PP 441 – 115,1997. [8] CP5: 1998. “Code of Practice for Electrical Installations”, Singapore Productivity and Standards Board, 1998.
  • 116. CHAPTER 5 FUSES According to BS 88 [Ref. 1], a fuse refers to a device that by the fusing of one or more of its specially designed and proportioned components opens the circuit in which it is inserted by breaking the current when the current exceeds a given value for a sufficient time. The fuse comprises all the parts that form the complete device. The complete device consists of a fuse-holder and a fuse-base. Each fuse-holder has a fuse-carrier and a fuse-link as shown in Figure 5.1 Fuse-carrier Fuse-link Fuse-base Figure 5.1 Component parts of a fuse BS 88 [Ref. 1] also defines a fuse-link as a device comprising a fuse element enclosed in a cartridge, usually filled with an arc-extinguishing medium and connected to terminations. The fuse-link is the part of a fuse that requires replacing after the fuse has operated. The arc-extinguishing medium consists of high purity sand or powdered quartz and the material for the fuse-element is either silver or copper. Once a fuse-element operates (i.e. melts), the arc with its high instantaneous power creates a tube of melted sand around it which withdraws energy from the arc and extinguishes it. The spray of metal from the arc root is also entrapped in the filler. 104
  • 117. Fuses 105 Fuses are still used extensively in the utility’s LV network for cable protection; as backup protection in the industrial installation for a circuit- breaker that has inadequate breaking capacity, and for protection in various types of electrical appliances. The main advantage of the fuse is its ability to interrupt very large short-circuit currents safely within its breaking capacity and in a much shorter time than that of a circuit breaker. The other advantage is its lower capital cost as compared to a circuit breaker of a similar rating and breaking capacity. The disadvantages of using fuses are obviously that once a fuse has operated, it has to be replaced by the correct type; and that fuses generates heat, dissipates power and may also result in a voltage drop. 5.1 CHARACTERISTIC OF FUSES A fuse rated at 50 A does not operate when a current of more than 50 A, say 60 A passes through it during a slight overload condition. A fuse with a specified breaking capacity of 80 kA does not ‘see’ the 80 kA at all when the prospective current of 80 kA passes through it. The current of 80 kA is actually ‘cut-off’ by the specially designed fuse-element. 5.1.1 Current Rating and Fusing Current The rated current of a fuse is a current stated by the manufacturer as the current that the fuse-link, fuse-carrier and fuse-base will carry continuously without deterioration in accordance with the specified conditions. The conventional non-fusing current (Inf) is a value of current specified as that which the fuse-link is capable of carrying for a specified time (conventional time) without melting. The conventional time can be 1 hr (for IN < 63 A), 2 hr (for IN < 160 A), 3 hr (for IN < 400 A) or 4 hr (for IN > 400 A). The conventional fusing current (If) is a value of current specified as that which causes operation of the fuse-link within the conventional time. For “gG” fuse-links, Inf = 1.25 IN, and If = 1.6 IN where IN is the current rating of the fuse. Based on the range of breaking capacity and utilisation category, BS 88 [Ref. 1] defines fuses by two letters as follows: gG : full-range breaking capacity (g) for general applications (G). gM : full-range breaking capacity (g) for protection of motor circuits (M). aM : partial range breaking capacity (a) for protection of motor (M). The partial range refers to the high current range for short circuit protection. This type of fuse is not designed to interrupt small overcurrent.
  • 118. 106 Chapter 5 5.1.2 I2t and Cut-off Current A conductor will generate heat by the passage of current through it. The heat generated in the conductor which has a resistance value of R, in the time dt for a current I, is I2R dt. In other words, I2dt Joules are generated for every ohm of conductor. If the current is changing over a time interval, the integral of I2dt (i.e. ∫ I2dt) Joules will be generated for every ohm of resistance. If a fuse-link is tested on a very high prospective current, there is no time for the heat to be lost into the surrounding and thus I2t required to melt the fuse-element is constant and independent of the injected current. However, the pre-arcing I2t is proportional to the square of the cross-sectional area of the section melted [Ref. 2, P 327]. For silver to be used as the fuse-element, the value of I2t is 66,000 S2A2s, and for copper, it is 90,000 S2A2s where S is the cross-sectional area of the fuse-element at the narrowest point in mm2, A is the current in amperes and s is the time in seconds. Limits on the minimum and maximum values of the pre-arcing I2t at 0.01 s specified by BS 88 [Ref.1, P 22] are given in Table 5.1. Typical values of the pre-arcing I2t and the total I2t for a range of fuses from 2 A to 1250 A under short-circuit conditions on prospective current up to 80 kA are given in Figure 5.2 and Figure 5.3. The operating I2t is the sum of the pre-arcing I2t and the arcing I2t. For a particular fuse rating, as the I2t is at a constant value, the prospective current that passes through the fuse will be limited to a value called the cut-off current. For example, for a prospective current of 80 kA (r.m.s. symmetrical) passing through a fuse-link rated at 400 A, this current will be cut-off at 40 kA peak which is equal to 28 kA r.m.s. For the same fuse link, if the prospective current is 30 kA (r.m.s. symmetrical), this current will be cut- off at 30 kA peak which is equal to 21 kA r.m.s. The prospective current is defined as the current that would flow in the same circuit if the fuse had been replaced by a copper link of negligible resistance. The value of the cut-off current is a function of the normal rating of the fuse, the prospective current and the degree of asymmetry of the short-circuit current. Figure 5.4 shows the values of cut-off current of a particular fuse-link for ratings from 2 A to 1250 A. An indication of the speed of operation and current limiting ability of a 400-A fuse-link is given in Figure 5.5 which shows the oscillogram of the fuse interrupting a prospective current of 80 kA r.m.s. at 400 V. The cut- off current is 39.5 kA and the instantaneous power absorbed by the
  • 119. Fuses 107 melting sand is 36,700 kW. The pre-arcing time is 0.0016 s and the arcing time is 0.0034 s. Fig 5.2 I2 t characteristics for fuse-link from 2 to 160 A 2 6 10 16 20 32 40 50 63 100 160 Fuse rating (Amperes) 100 101 102 103 104 105 Operating I2 t at 415V I2 t (A2 s) Pre-arcing I2 t Operating I2 t at 550V Operating I2 t at 660V Fig 5.3 I2 t characteristics for fuse-link from 200 to 1250 A 200 250 315 400 500 630 710 800 1250 Fuse rating (Amperes) I2 t (A2 s) 106 105 104 107
  • 120. 108 Chapter 5 Table 5.1 Pre-arcing I2t at 0.01 s for ‘gG’ fuse-links Fuse rating I2t, (103 x A2s) min max 16 0.3 1.0 32 1.8 5.0 40 3.0 9.0 63 9.0 27.0 100 27.0 86.0 125 46.0 140.0 200 140.0 400.0 400 760.0 2250.0 630 2250.0 7500.0 1250 800 630 500 400 315 200 125 80 50 35 25 16 6 2 1.0 10 1000.1 100 101 102 Cut-off current (kA, peak) Prospective current (kA r.m.s.) Fig 5.4 Cut-off current characteristics for fuse-link from 2 to 1250 A
  • 121. Fuses 109 39.5 kA Cut-off current 0 t t t 930 V Peak arcing voltage Recovery voltage Prospective current 36,700 kW Energy dissipated in fuse cartridge Pre-arcing 0.0016s Arcing 0.0034s Pre-arcing I2 t t 2.44X106 A2 s 592X103 A2 s Total I2 t 15.87 Wh Fig 5.5 The operation of a 400-A fuse-link at 80 kA 5.1.3 Time-current Zone The time-current characteristic of a fuse-link is a curve giving the pre- arcing time or the operating time (the sum of pre-arcing time and arcing time) as a function of the prospective current under the stated conditions of operation. For a time longer than 0.1 s for practical purposes, the difference between pre-arcing time and operating time is negligible. This time-current characteristic similar to the time-current characteristic of MCB, can be used to determine the operating time of a fuse-link for a particular prospective current if the operating time is above 0.1 s. For operating times less than 0.1 s, the arcing time becomes a significant part and the asymmetric currents may vary considerably and thus the operating time below 0.1 s cannot be obtained accurately.
  • 122. 110 Chapter 5 Instead of specifying the time-current characteristic, many standards specify a time-current zone. The time-current zone indicates the range contained by the minimum pre-arcing time-current characteristic and the maximum operating time-current characteristic under specified conditions. Four points known as gates in the time-current zone are specified. These gates are the maximum and minimum levels between which the manufacturer’s time-current characteristics for individual fuse-links must lie. The values of the four gates are: the minimum value of current corresponding to the pre-arching time of 0.1 s, Imin (0.1 s), the maximum value of current corresponding to the pre-arcing time of 0.1 s, Imax (0.1 s), the minimum value of current corresponding to the pre-arcing time of 10 s, Imin (10 s), and the maximum value of current corresponding to the pre- arcing time of 5 s, Imax (5 s). Typical time-current zones [Ref. 3] for ‘gG’ fuse-link are given in Figure 5.6 together with the four gates for the 63-A fuse-link. Fig 5.6 Time-current zones for “gG” fuse-link 1 hr 2 hr 3 hr 4 hr 104 10-1 100 101 102 103 105 Time (seconds) 10 100 1,000 10,000 Prospective current (Amperes) 4 10 16 40 63 100 250 400 630 1000
  • 123. Fuses 111 5.2 MINIATURE FUSES Miniature fuses are fuses with dimensions of 5 mm x 20 mm and 6.3⋅mm⋅x⋅32 mm. They are used for the protection of electric appliances, electronic equipment and the relevant components. These fuses are rated at 250 V with a current rating from 32 mA to 6.3 A. Fuses in this category normally have a resistance value in the range from 1 Ω to 200 Ω. Thus, the voltage drop at rated current can vary from 1 V to as high as 10V. Typical values of the maximum sustained power dissipation for miniature fuses are 1.6 W, 2.5 W and 4 W. High and Low Breaking Capacity There are two types of miniature fuse-links, namely low breaking capacity and high breaking capacity. The low breaking capacity types have cylindrical glass bodies and the fuse-element breaks the current in the air within the glass body. The rated breaking capacity is 35 A or 10 IN, whichever is greater. This breaking capacity is adequate for clearing short-circuit currents at component level. However, at the incoming supply to the equipment, a fuse-link of higher breaking capacity is required. A miniature fuse-link with high breaking capacity is rated at 1.5 kA. These fuse-links have ceramic barrels and are filled with sand. Quick-Acting and Time-Lag To satisfy the operation requirements for various applications, the speeds of operation of the miniature fuse-links are made in five different types, ranging from very quick acting type to long time-lag which may take up to 5 s for four times the rated current. According to BS EN 60127-1 [Ref. 4], the symbols denoting the speed of operation are to be marked on the fuse as follows: FF : denoting very quick acting F : denoting quick acting M : denoting medium time-lag T : denoting time-lag TAT : denoting long time lag The pre-arcing time/current characteristic of the high breaking capacity fuses are summarised in Table 5.2 and for the low breaking capacity fuses in Table 5.3. In some applications, surge-proof time-lag fuse-links are required. This fuse-link is able to absorb the transient inrush current when switching on capacitors or motors. Each fuse-link shall be marked with its
  • 124. 112 Chapter 5 type of operation, rated current, type of breaking capacity and the rated voltage. Examples of markings are: T315L 250 V : time lag, 315 mA, low breaking capacity, 250 V F4H 250 V : quick-acting, 4 A, high breaking capacity, 250 V Table 5.2 Time/current characteristic of high breaking fuses Injected Current 2.1 IN 2.75 IN 4 IN 10 IN Pre-arcing time Quick-acting 30 min 2 s 0.3 s 0.02 s Time-lag 30 min 80 s 5 s 0.1 s Table 5.3 Time/current characteristic of low breaking fuses Injected Current 2.1 IN 2.75 IN 4 IN 10 IN Pre-arcing time Quick-acting 30 min 2 s 0.3 s 0.02 s Time-lag 2 min 10 s 3 s 0.3 s Miniature Fuse Standards The main industrial standards for miniature fuses are BS EN 60127-1 [Ref. 4] and BS EN 60127-2 [Ref. 5]. These two standards define the requirements, standard ratings, markings and methods of testing. Standard Rating Voltage : 60, 150, 250 V Current : 50, 63, 80, 100, 125, 160, 200, 250, 315, 400, 500, 630, 800 mA 1, 1.25, 1.6, 2, 2.5, 3.15, 4, 5, 6.3 A Breaking capacity : 35 A, 1.5 kA Power dissipation : 1.6, 2.5, 4 W 5.3 LOW VOLTAGE FUSES The low-voltage fuses cover a large range of fuses incorporating enclosed current-limiting fuse-links with rated breaking capacity of not less than 6 kA. They are used for protection of a.c. circuits of nominal voltages not exceeding 1000 V or d.c. circuits of nominal voltages, not exceeding 1500 V. The low-voltage fuses have three major groups, namely the BS 88 [Ref. 1] of a high breaking capacity up to 80 kA for industrial and utility applications, the BS 1361 [Ref. 6] with a breaking capacity up to 33 kA for use in domestic and office buildings, and the BS 1362 [Ref. 7] with a breaking capacity of 6 kA for use in plugs.
  • 125. Fuses 113 80-kA Fuse Fuses for industrial applications with breaking capacity up to 80 kA are specified in BS 88: Part 2 [Ref. 1] and in IEC 269-2-1 [Ref. 3]. The preferred current ratings for fuse-links are: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 25, 32, 40, 50, 63, 80, 100, 125, 160, 200, 250, 315, 400, 500, 630, 800, 1000, 1250 A. The values of the maximum power dissipation are in the range from 3 W for a 20-A fuse, 40 W for a 400-A fuse to 100 W for a 1250-A fuse. Fuse-links are also classified according to their fusing factors. A class P fuse-link shall have a fusing factor not exceeding 1.25 and a class Q1 fuse-link not exceeding 1.5 [Ref. 8]. Typical time/current characteristics for fuses to BS 88: Part 2 and Part 6 are given in Figure 5.7. BS 88: Part 5 [Ref. 9] specifies the fuse link ratings from 100 A to 630 A for use in utility’s low-voltage supply network. BS 88: Part 6 [Ref. 10] specifies the fuse-link for use in industrial and commercial installations which have current ratings of 2, 4, 6, 10, 16, 20, 25, 32, 40, 50 and 63 A. Figure 5.7 Time-current characteristic for fuse to BS 88 6A 20A 32A 50A 80A 125A 200A 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 10 2 4 100 2 4 1000 Prospective current (Amperes) Time (seconds) 1 hr 2 hr
  • 126. 114 Chapter 5 33-kA and 16.5-kA Fuses BS 1361 [Ref. 6] specifies the requirements for fuses for a.c. circuits of 240 V with a breaking capacity of 16.5 kA for use in consumer’s DBs in dwelling houses, blocks of flats and office buildings. It also covers fuses of 415 V with a breaking capacity of 33 kA for use by the supply utility in the incoming service units of such premises. The current ratings are 5, 15, 20, 30 and 45 A for the 16.5-kA fuse, and 60, 80 and 100 A for the 33-kA fuse. The values of maximum power dissipation are in the range of 1 W to 8 W. Typical time/current characteristics are given in Figure 5.8. Fig 5.8 Time-current characteristics for fuse to BS 1361 5A 15A 20A 30A 45A 60A 80A 100A 10 2 4 100 2 4 1,000 Prospective current (Amperes) 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 Time (seconds) 1 hr 2 hr 6-kA Fuse BS 1362 [Ref. 7] specifies the dimensions and performance requirements for general purpose cartridge fuse-links of a current rating not exceeding
  • 127. Fuses 115 13 A, primarily for use in plugs at a voltage not exceeding 250 V. The rated breaking capacity is 6 kA and the preferred current ratings are 3 A (coloured red) and 13 A (coloured brown). Other current ratings may be used for special applications and are coloured black. Standard time/current zones for 3-A and 13-A fuse-links are shown in Figure 5.9. 5.4 APPLICATION GUIDES Almost the whole LV cable network of an urban utility uses fuses as the only protective devices for overload and short-circuit protection. Although MCCBs and MCBs are popular and the cost margin between circuit breakers and fuses is small, there are still many existing industrial installations which utilise fuses as the only means of protection except for the incoming circuit which is protected by an ACB. Fuses are also used intensively in plugs, appliances and at various component levels in electronic equipment. Therefore, a guide on the selection of fuses is still essential. Time (seconds) 13A3A 10 2 4 100 2 4 1,000 104 103 102 101 100 10-1 10-2 Current (Amperes) Fig 5.9 Time-current zone for fuse to BS 1362
  • 128. 116 Chapter 5 The single-line diagram of a typical low-voltage (LV) board feeding by a 1- MVA 6.6/0.4-kV transformer for utility services is shown in Figure 1.14. All the outgoing circuits are four-core 300 mm2 copper conductors XLPE cables protected by BS 88 fuses rated at 500 A. Each outgoing circuit from the LV board is connected to a number of over-ground (OG) boxes. The single-line diagram of a typical OG box is shown in Figure 1.15. Each outgoing circuit from the OG box is a four-core or two-core copper conductors XLPE cable protected by a BS 88 fuse rated at 200 A. The outgoing circuits from OG boxes feed the consumers directly. 5.4.1 Cable Protection In section 3.5, the conditions for adequate protection of cables for overload are specified. They are: (i) IN < IZ (ii) I2 < 1.45 IZ IEE Regulation 433-02-02 [Ref. 11, P 45] states that where the protective device is a general purpose type (gG) fuse to BS 88 Part 2, a fuse to BS88 Part 6, or a fuse to BS 1361, compliance with condition (i) also results in compliance with condition (ii). Based on BS 88 Part 2 [Ref. 8], class Q1 fuse-links have a fusing factor not exceeding 1.5. In other words, the fuse will operate at 1.5 IN, i.e. I2= 1.5 IN. BS 88 Part 1 [Ref. 1, P 14] has considered a conventional fusing current of 1.6 IN, i.e. I2 = 1.6 IN. Thus, if the cable size is so selected that IZ is equal to or slightly higher than IN, condition (ii) may not be fully satisfied. Let us consider the following case: IN = 100 A, IZ = 100 A and 1.45 IZ = 145 A Based on a fusing factor of 1.5, the value of I2 is 150 A and based on a conventional fusing current of 1.6 IN, the value of I2 is 160 A. In either case, I2 is not < 1.45 IZ and condition (ii) is not satisfied. Thus, to provide adequate protection for small overloads, it is suggested that the value of IZ should not be too close to IN. For short-circuit protection to prevent thermal damage to the cable, IEE Regulation 434-03-03 [Ref. 11, P 46] requires the operating time of the protective device to be less or equal to tcable,max as follows : 2 F 22 maxcable, I Sk t =
  • 129. Fuses 117 where k, S and IF are specified in Section 3.6. This formula can be used to check for short-circuit protection by fuses in the same way as by breakers. However, during short-circuit conditions for which the short-circuit current would result in the fuse to operate within 0.1 s, the requirement for short-circuit protection can be stated as: I2t < k2S2 where the I2t is the let-through operating I2t of the fuse (not equal to the square of the prospective current times the operating time of the protective device). As long as I2t is less than k2S2, it ensures that the fuse-links selected will not allow the cable to exceed its critical (maximum) temperature if a short-circuit fault occurs. You may consider a fuse as a weak link in a circuit and it has much smaller cross-sectional area than the cable it protects. During short circuit, the fuse-element will reach its melting point before the cable reaches its critical temperature. Thus, as long as the let-through operating I2t of the fuse is lower than the k2S2 of the cable, it is always safe. The larger the current, the quicker the fuse- element melts. If deterioration should occur, it operates even faster. Therefore, a fuse is a device that ‘fails safe’. Example 5.1 The same details for Example 3.10 are used, except that the protective device is a BS 88 fuse rated at 63 A as shown in Figure 5.10. 1C/Cu/PVC/NA, clipped direct4 x 10 mm2 BS88 63A = 50A IF = 4000AIB Figure 5.10 Circuit for Example 5.1 Solution (a) IN = 63 A, IZ = 59 A I2 = 1.5 x 63 = 94.5 A based on a fusing factor of 1.5 or I2 = 1.6 x 63 = 100.8 A based on a conventional fusing current of 1.6 IN 1.45 IZ = 1.45 x 59 = 85.6 A Since IN is not < IZ and I2 is not < 1.45 IZ, this circuit does not provide adequate overload protection. The designer should select the next higher size of conductor such as 16 mm2 so that this circuit can be fully protected by overload.
  • 130. 118 Chapter 5 (b) In Example 3.10, since the operating time of the MCCB is 0.15 s, which is larger than the critical time of 0.0827 s, this circuit could not provide adequate protection for thermal damage during short-circuit conditions. In this example, we have replaced the 60-A MCCB by a BS 88 63-A fuse. The operating I2t of the 63-A fuse obtained from Figure 5.2 is 22 x 103 A2s and the k2S2 of the cable is: k2S2 = 1152 x 102 = 1,322,500 A2s = 1,323 x 103 A2s It is obvious that the k2S2 of the cable is much larger than the I2t of the fuse, and thus, it provides very good protection from short-circuit currents. In this particular application, a MCCB fails and a fuse passes. The value of I2t of the 63-A fuse obtained from Figure 5.2 is based on a prospective current of 80 kA but in this example, the prospective current is only 4 kA. Thus, the value of I2t for the 63-A fuse may not be 22 x 103 A2s. However, the referred value of 22 x 103 A2s is much lesser than the k2S2 of the cable of 1323 x 103 A2s. 5.4.2 Motor Circuit In a motor circuit, the starter overload relay protects the associated cable against overload current, and the fuse-link in the circuit provides the required degree of short-circuit protection. Therefore, the selection of fuse-link is based on the requirement for short-circuit protection only, i.e.: I2t < k2S2 where I2t is the operating I2t of the fuse-link. In addition to the ability to interrupt fault current and protect the associated contractor and cable, the fuse-link must also be capable of withstanding the motor starting current for the starting period. The general methods of determining the capability of a fuse to withstand motor starting conditions is to refer to the 10-s withstand current. Usually it is assumed that the starting current is approximately seven times the motor full load current and that such a current would exist for up to 10 s. Most of the fuse manufacturers give recommended sizes of fuse-links for standard sizes of motors in their catalogues. BS 88 also specifies the value of current for each rating of fuse-links to withstand for 10 s [Ref. 1, P 15].
  • 131. Fuses 119 If the manufacturer’s data is not available, the starting conditions are suggested in Table 5.4. Table 5.4 Typical starting condition Motor Rating DOL Starter Assisted Starters up to 1 kW 5 x IFL for 5 sec 2.5 x IFL for 20 sec 1.1 kW to 75 kW 7 x IFL for 10 sec 4 x IFL for 15 sec Above 75 kW 6 x IFL for 15 sec 3.5 x IFL for 10 sec For a fuse-link in a motor circuit, a dual rating such as 32M63 may be used. The first rating denotes the continuous current rating of the fuse-holder in which the fuse-link can be fitted and the second rating (after the letter M) indicates the time/current characteristic of the fuse-link. Therefore, the 32M63 fuse-link has a continuous rating of 32 A because of the limitation of the fuse-holder in which it is installed, and has the same time/current characteristic as the standard 63-A fuse-link. Example 5.2 The same details as in Example 2.2 are used, except that the protective device is a BS 88 fuse instead of an MCCB as shown in Figure 5.11. Motor 20 kWDOL BS88 Figure 5.11 Selection of the current rating of a fuse Solution As calculated in Example 2.2, the 3-phase short-circuit current at the main switchboard is 28.86 kA. A BS 88 fuse with a breaking capacity of 80 kA or a BS 1361 fuse with a breaking capacity of 33 kA will be adequate to provide protection for short circuit. As the full load current is 35.75 A, the current rating of the fuse should be at least equal to 35.75 A and a standard size of 50 A will be adequate. For an ambient temperature of 200C and a starting current of 250 A for 10
  • 132. 120 Chapter 5 s, the operating time of the 50-A fuse obtained from Figure 5.7 is 4 s. If the current rating of the fuse is 80 A, the operating time is 60 s. Thus, a BS 88 fuse with a current rating of 80 A is selected. In Example 2.2, the current rating of the MCCB is 63 A which has an operating time of 18 s for the starting current of 250 A. BS 88 Part 2 [Ref. 8] requires fuse-links be suitable for use in ambient air temperature not exceeding 350C and it is recognised that derating may be necessary at higher ambient air temperatures. Thus, for an ambient temperature of 400C, the current rating of the fuse may have to be higher than 80 A. The designer must check for the relevant derating factor from the fuse manufacturers or their publications. 5.4.3 Electric Shock Fuses normally do not operate fast enough to protect against electric shock, as the earth leakage current is usually not high enough for the fuse to operate within the required time. For example, based on Figure 5.7, for an earth fault current of 100 A, the operating time of a 20-A fuse is 1.5 s and for a 32-A fuse, 15 s. As discussed in Section 4.5, protection against electric shock requires the protective device to operate in either 0.4 s or 5 s. Therefore, for installation that is protected by fuse, an RCCB is always recommended especially for a TT system. However, if protection for electric shock has to be provided by a fuse, the earth fault loop impedance for the circuit has to be reduced to a value such that the earth fault current is high enough to operate the fuse within the required time of either 0.4 s or 5 s. Table 41B1 of IEE Regulations [Ref. 11, P 33] specifies the maximum earth fault loop impedance for fuses to operate within 0.4 s, Table 41C(a) of the IEE Regulations [Ref. 11, P 34] specifies the maximum impedance of the CPC for a disconnection time not exceeding 5 s and Table 41D(a) of IEE Regulations [Ref. 10, P 35] specifies the maximum earth fault impedance for a 5 s disconnection time. As discussed in Section 4.4.1, the values of the maximum earth fault loop impedance are obtained by: timerequiredthewithinoperationcausingcurrentEffective voltageearth-to-lineRated Z max,TN,EFL =
  • 133. Fuses 121 If the overcurrent protective device is a BS 88 32-A fuse, and based on Figure 5.7, the current causing the 32-A fuse to be operated at 0.4 s is 220 A, and at 5 s is 125 A. Thus, the maximum earth fault loop impedance for a line-to-earth voltage of 240 V at 0.4 s disconnection time is: Ω== 09.1 220 240 Z 4.0max,,TN,EFL The value of 1.09 Ω is identical to the value given in Table 41B1 of the IEE Regulations. The maximum earth fault loop impedance for a line-to-earth voltage of 240 V at 5 s disconnection time is: Ω== 92.1 125 240 Z 5max,,TN,EFL The value of 1.92 Ω is also identical to the value given in Table 41D of IEE Regulations. If the line-to-earth voltage is 230 V, the maximum earth fault loop impedance is: Ω=×= 045.1 240 230 09.1Z 230,4.0max,,TN,EFL or it can be calculated by: 230 220 1045= . Ω 5.4.4 Discrimination For a simple network as shown in Figure 5.12, if there is a short-circuit or excess overload in one of the outgoing circuits, the respective fuse (called minor fuse) should operate first to isolate the fault. If, however, the incoming fuse (called major fuse) operates faster than the minor fuse, it will result in the loss of supply to all the outgoing circuits. This un- coordinated operation is known as loss of discrimination. Positive discrimination under short-circuit conditions is achieved when the major fuse-link is unaffected by the fault current which causes the smaller or minor fuse-link to operate. The total operating I2t let through by the minor fuse-link must, therefore, be less than the pre-arcing I2t of the major fuse-link. Typical I2t characteristics for a range of fuse-links are
  • 134. 122 Chapter 5 shown in Figures 5.2 and 5.3. They were derived from tests taken under maximum arc energy conditions and can be used to assess discrimination at 415 V, 550 V or 660 V. For 415 V or 400 V applications, a current rating ratio of 2: 1 between major and minor fuse-links will ensure discrimination at all fault levels. However, the I2t characteristics can be used to assess discrimination where it is necessary to resort to the use of a smaller ratio to overcome a particular problem. At 550 V and 660 V, it may not always be possible to assume a general discrimination ratio of 2:1 if large fault levels are encountered. In such cases, the I2t characteristics must be used to achieve a satisfactorily graded installation. O/L Minor fuse Minor fuse Minor fuse Major fuse Figure 5.12 Illustration for discrimination 5.4.5 Back-up for Circuit-breakers Both MCCBs and MCBs have limited breaking capacity in the range from 6 kA to 35 kA but the breaking capacity of a BS 88 fuse is 80 kA. Final circuits at a reasonably long distance from the incoming supply normally have a fault level in the range from 4 kA to 10 kA. However, if MCBs or MCCBs are installed very close to the incoming transformer, the fault level may reach values of 20 to 25 kA which may exceed the breaker’s breaking capacity. A short-circuit would be likely to cause the circuit-breaker to fail or explode in the absence of suitable back up protection. A fuse, with its high breaking capacity and its very short operating time during a high prospective current, is therefore an ideal candidate to provide stand-by back-up for a circuit breaker that has an inadequate breaking capacity. The criteria for selecting fuses for such back-up protection is illustrated in Figure 5.13 and as follows:
  • 135. Fuses 123 Fig 5.13 Back-up of MCB by fuse 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 Current (Amperes) 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 Time (seconds) BS 88 200A MCB 100A Type B 10mm2 Breaking capacity T (i) The time-current characteristic of the fuse-link should be such that the operating time of the fuse is significantly greater (i.e. higher than the curve of the circuit breaker) than the operating time of the circuit- breaker at all currents up to the takeover current T as shown in Figure 5.13. In other words, for all fault currents below point ‘T’, the breaker should operate faster than the fuse since the fault current is below the level corresponding to the pre-arcing I2t of the fuse and also within the breaker’s breaking capacity. (ii) The take-over current T is chosen to be not exceeding the breaking capacity of the breaker so that the fuse can take over at a current just before it exceeds the breaking capacity of 10 kA as shown in Figure 5.13.
  • 136. 124 Chapter 5 (iii) The current rating of the fuse is selected in such a way that the operating I2t of the fuse-link will also provide protection against thermal damage of the associated cable in the region exceeding 11 kA where the breaker fails to provide such protection. 5.5 REFERENCES [1] BS 88: Part 1: 1988, “Cartridge Fuses for Voltages up to and including 1000 V a.c. and 1500 V d.c. Part 1: General Requirements”, British Standard Institution, 1988/1991 (identical to IEC 269-1 : 1986). [2] Electricity Council, “Power System Protection I”, Peter Petegrinus, UK, 1981. [3] IEC 269-2-1, “Low-voltage Fuses, Part 2: Supplementary Requirements for Fuses for use by Authorised Persons (fuses mainly for industrial applications)”, International Electrotechnical Commission, 1987/1994. [4] BSEN 60127-1: 1991, “Miniature Fuses, Part 1, Definitions for Miniature Fuses and General Requirements for Miniature Fuse- links”, British Standard Institution, 1991. [5] BSEN 60127-2: 1991, “Miniature Fuses, Part 2, Specifications for Cartridge Fuse-Links”, British Standard Institution, 1991. [6] BS 1361 : 1971, “Cartridge Fuses for A.C. Circuits in Domestic and Similar Premises”, British Standard Institution, 1971/1991. [7] BS 1362 : 1973, “General Purpose Fuse-Links for Domestic and Similar Purposes (primarily for use in plugs)”, British Standard Institution, 1973/1991. [8] BS 88 : Part 2 : 1975, “Supplementary Requirements for Fuses of Standardised Dimensions and Performance for Industrial Purposes”, British Standard Institution, 1975/1991. [9] BS 88 : Part 5 : 1988, “Supplementary Requirements for Fuse-links for use in a.c. Electricity Supply Networks”, British Standard Institution, 1988. [10] BS 88 : Part 6 : 1988, “Supplementary Requirements for Fuses of Compact Dimension for use in 240/415 V a.c. Industrial and Commercial Electrical Installations”, British Standard Institution, 1988/1991. [11] “Regulations for Electrical Installation”, 16th Edition, IEE, 1991.
  • 137. 125 CHAPTER 6 DESIGN PROCEDURES AND EXAMPLES Safety of life and preservation of property are the first two important factors to be considered in the design of low-voltage systems in buildings. Safety to personnel should not be compromised at all and only the safest system can be considered. The safety requirements should follow the established codes such as the IEE Wiring Regulations [Ref 1], CP5 [Ref 2] or NEC [Ref 3]. Most of the established codes require the installations to be properly earthed and the whole electric system should be protected adequately against electric shock. Such electric shock can be due to a direct contact to any live conducting parts, or due to an indirect contact to the exposed-conductive-parts which are maintained normally at the earth potential, but may become live during an earth fault. In addition, every electric circuit should be designed to be adequately protected against overcurrent as a result of overload or short circuit. Although overloaded circuits are electrically sound, sustained overload for a long duration will result in the conductor temperature exceeding their rated limit and the effectiveness of the insulation and their expected lifetime will be reduced. The designer must also ensure that appropriate protective devices are provided to interrupt any short-circuit current in the conductor of every circuit before such current causes danger or damage to the system due to thermal effects and mechanical forces produced in conductors and connections. The designer must provide a reliable system and keep the supply interruption to a minimum. There should be no nuisance tripping of breakers and no loss of discrimination in the automatic disconnection of supply during any fault conditions. The estimated demand in each area of the building should be met adequately over a long period and the designed system must also be provided with some overload capability for contingency. The designer must also provide flexibility for future expansion and to meet varied requirements during the life of the plant. While first costs are important, safety, reliability, voltage regulation, and the potential for expansion must also be considered in the design of low- voltage systems. On one hand, the designer should not provide unnecessary
  • 138. 126 Chapter 6 increase in the circuit capacity to avoid over-design. On the other hand, the system should meet all the safety requirements as well as reliability and flexibility, so that the installed system is robust enough and the designer has nothing to worry and can always ‘sleep well’ over 20 to 30 years after the system has been commissioned and tested. 6.1 DESIGN CURRENTS Since a good designer has to provide adequate and reliable supply at minimum cost, the estimation of the design currents in each circuit in the installation is a major factor that the designer has to decide. Any error in the estimation of load current in the circuits would result in either over- design which will increase the installation cost or under-design which will result in more circuits being overloaded and frequent breaker tripping. The design current which is the expected load current in a circuit can be determined by the power demand (i.e. the rated wattage), power factor and efficiency of the connected load. However, the design current of an incoming circuit may not necessarily be equal to the current drawn by the total connected load. For example, if a circuit has to supply 10 appliances, each drawing up to 10 A, a 100 A circuit would presumably be required to supply all appliances. In actual implementation, it is unlikely that each appliance will be loaded up to the specified value of 10 A all the time and that all the appliances would be used at the same time. Based on past experiences, the designer may provide only an 85-A circuit. In other words, we recognise that while the total connected load (TCL) may be 100 A, the maximum demand (MD) or the design current of the circuit will only be 85 A. 6.1.1 Design Currents in a Final DB Let us define a final DB as a DB that has appliances connected directly to it, and each outgoing circuit from the final DB to the appliance as a final circuit. Each final circuit has to carry the full load current of its connected appliance and thus, the design current of each final circuit should be equal to the full load current of the appliance. This full load current is normally calculated from the wattage and power factor of the connected load. However, the design current of the incoming circuit of the final DB, also known as the maximum demand of the DB, should be less than the summation of all the design currents in each outgoing circuit. The current reduction in the incoming circuit is due to three reasons. First of all, it is unlikely that all the final circuits will be turned on at the same time. Secondly, if all the final circuits are turned on, it is unlikely that they will
  • 139. Design Procedures and Examples 127 all carry their full load currents simultaneously. The third reason is that the rating of many appliances, especially motors, are of standard rating such as 500 W or 1000 W, and the actual required power (i.e. the mechanical power in the case of a motor) is actually less than the standard size. For example, for any required power in the range from 451 W to 499 W, a standard size 500 W motor will be used. Thus, the appropriate design current of a DB can be obtained by defining a demand factor as follows: TCL MD DF = where: DF is the demand factor, MD is the maximum demand or the design demand of a DB and TCL is the total connected load of the DB. The value of the demand factor depends on the number of circuits and the types of load connected to the DB. A typical value is in the range from 0.8 to 0.95. 6.1.2 Design Currents in a Distribution DB Several final DBs may be connected to a main DB that will then be connected to the incoming switchboard. Let us define all the interconnected DBs except the final DBs as distribution DBs and all the circuits connected between the various DBs as distribution circuits. As there is no appliance connected directly to the distribution DB, the estimation of load current or the design current will be slightly different from the method for final DBs. Final DB 1 Final DB 2 Distribution circuit 1 Distribution circuit 2 Figure 6.1 Design current for distribution DB If a distribution DB is connected to two final DBs, DB1 and DB2, as shown in Figure 6.1, the design current of distribution circuit 1 will be equal to the maximum demand of the final DB1, and similarly, the design current of distribution circuit 2 will be equal to the maximum demand of the final DB2.
  • 140. 128 Chapter 6 Let us examine the variation of maximum demand over a 24-hour period in distribution circuits 1 and 2 as shown in Figure 6.2. Circuit 1 has a maximum demand of 50 kW occurring at 4:00 p.m. Circuit 2 also has the same value of maximum demand but occurs at 7:30 p.m. The hourly summation of the maximum demand of circuits 1 and 2 should be equal to the hourly maximum demand of the incoming circuit of the main DB as shown in Figure 6.2. It is noted that the maximum demand of the main DB is 72.5 kW occurring at 6:00 p.m. You may install a chart recorder at the incoming and the two outgoing circuits, and you will find that although the maximum power of both circuits are 50 kW, the maximum power at the incoming circuit is not 100 kW but 72.5 kW. The value of the maximum demand of the incoming circuit depends on how coincident are the maximum demands of the two outgoing circuits. It can, of course, be equal to 100 kW if the maximum demands of the two outgoing circuits coincide. M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 0 50 72.5 aximum Demand (kW) Time circuit 2 circuit 1 incoming circuit Figure 6.2 Maximum demand coincides at 6:00 p.m.
  • 141. Design Procedures and Examples 129 For the estimation of design current in any distribution DB or at any switchboard, if the values of the maximum demand of all the outgoing circuits are given or have been estimated in the upstream calculation, the maximum demand of the incoming circuit can be calculated by defining a coincidence factor as follows: ∑= = n lk K I MD MD CF where: CF is the coincidence factor, MDI is the maximum demand of the incoming circuit, n is the number of outgoing circuits and MDK is the maximum demand of the kth outgoing circuit The value of CF depends mainly on the number of outgoing circuits and has a typical value from 0.75 to 0.95. In some other guides [Ref 4, P 66], a diversity factor which is the reciprocal of CF is referred. 6.1.3 Procedure for Load Estimation A suggested procedure for determining the design currents in various sections of a building is given in the following steps. ♦ Determine the quantity of each type of load and the power requirements. Estimate the design current in each final circuit based on the rating of the connected load. Apply an appropriate demand factor to obtain the maximum demand of each final DB. ♦ Determine the type of connection from the final DB to the main DB and continue up to the incoming switchboard. Estimate the design current in each distribution circuit using an appropriate coincidence factor. ♦ Determine the spare capacity to be provided for load growth. In the preliminary design stage of the project, the types of connected loads and their exact number may not be available. Some typical data given in Table 6.1 [Ref 4, P 57] can be referred to determine the total estimated load in a building, if exact loads are not available. Example 6.1 Calculate the partial load requirement of general purpose lighting, general purpose socket outlets and air-conditioning of a new office building consisting of 20 levels, each having a floor area of 1200 m2.
  • 142. 130 Chapter 6 Solution Based on NEC [Ref 3, P 100], Table 220-3 (b), the general lighting load is 3.5 VA per ft2 and 1 VA per ft2 for general-purpose socket outlets. Based on a conversion factor of 1 m2 to 10.8 ft2 and a power factor of 0.8, the total general purpose lighting load is estimated to be: kW726 kW)2012008.108.05.3(LL = ××××= The total load for general-purpose socket outlets is: kW207 kW)2012008.108.01(LS = ××××= Based on an approximate air-conditioning load of 6 VA per ft2 that might occur in the average office building [Ref 4, P 59], the total air-conditioning load is: kW1244 kW)2012008.108.06(LA = ××××= The partial load requirement of the building is: kW2177 kW)1244207726(PL = ++= Table 6.1 Load Demand for Preliminary Analysis Type of Load Average Demand Lighting in Building 10 to 35 W/m2 General Purpose Socket Outlets 6 to 12 W/m2 Air Conditioning in Commercial Building 30 to 80 W/m2 Typical Textile Factory 120 W/m2 Small Device Manufacturing 35 to 75 W/m2 Typical Electronics Manufacturing 100 W/m2 Industrial Lighting 10 to 80 W/m2 Water Pump (10-storey) 10 to 45 kW Fire Pump (10-storey) 65 to 100 kW 6.1.4 Standard Code for Diversity Both CP5 [Ref 2] and the 15th Edition of the IEE Wiring Regulations have 17 appendices providing a great deal of data such as Appendix 4 on maximum demand and diversity, and Appendix 5 on the standard circuit
  • 143. Design Procedures and Examples 131 arrangements. The 16th Edition [Ref 1] has only 6 appendices and Appendices 4 and 5 of the 15th Edition have been removed. The philosophy is that the IEE Wiring Regulations [Ref 1] are now more general in their requirements, giving the designer only the basic requirements and leaving it to him to decide precisely what is needed. Referring to the estimation of maximum demands, IEE Regulation 311-01-01 only states that the maximum demand of an installation, expressed in amperes, shall be assessed and that in determining the maximum demand of an installation or part thereof, diversity may be taken into account. Table 4A and Table 4B of Appendix 4 of the 15th Edition of the IEE Wiring Regulations regarding maximum demand and diversity are still available in the form of ‘Guidance Notes’ [Ref 5, P 101]. However, it should be understood that the contents of the Guidance Notes will not form part of the IEE Wiring Regulations for legal purposes. 6.2 DESIGN PROCEDURES Whether it is a final circuit for lighting, socket outlets or motor, or a distribution circuit connecting DBs, the basic design procedure is the same. The recommended design procedures in eight steps given in Table⋅6.2 are based on the requirements of the IEE Wiring Regulations [Ref 1]. 6.2.1 Lighting Circuit For lighting circuit, the running current of luminaries is not necessarily the major consideration especially where discharge fittings are used. In estimating the design current in step 1, the effects of the associated control gear and harmonics must be considered. Where the circuit is for discharge lighting and in the absence of more exact information from the manufacturers, the design current [Ref 5, P 34] can be taken as: I lamp rated B = ×18. wattage nominal voltage of circuit The multiplier of 1.8 is based on the assumption that the circuit is corrected to a power factor of not less than 0.85 lagging, and it takes into account control gear losses and harmonic currents. The typical power factor of an uncorrected discharge lamps may vary between 0.5 lead and 0.3 lag [Ref 5, P 35]. Lighting installations should be classified as fixed systems. The disconnection time (in Step 7) is 5 s for installations within the equipotential zone.
  • 144. 132 Chapter 6 Table 6.2 Basic Design Procedure Procedure Design Task Factors under consideration Step 1 Determine design current, IB.B Connected load, demand factor and coincidence factor. Step 2 Select the type and current rating of protective device, IN. IB, IB F such that : IN > IB, IB BC > IF Step 3 Determine the minimum tabulated current rating, It,min. It,min = IN / (Ca x Cg x CI ) or It,min = IB / (Ca x Cg x CI ) Step 4 Select the type of cable and the current rating such that It,min ≤ It It : tabulated current rating Conductor material, insulation material, single-or multi-core and installation methods. Step 5 Check voltage drop within 4% from supply intake to individual appliances. If the voltage drop exceeds 4%, repeat step 4. IB, circuit length, power factor, TVDr, TVDx,and conductor temperature. B Step 6 Check thermal limit of cable such that Tbk,3-Phase F < tcable,max tcable,max =( k 2 S 2 ) / IF 2 ,3-Phase Cable thermal constant k, 3-Phase short-circuit current, time-current characteristic of protective device. Step 7 For TN system, check for earth fault loop impedance ZEFL,TN, such that during an earth fault, the protective device will disconnect supply within the specified time of either 0.4 s or 5 s. Time current characteristic of protection device, source impedance, cable resistance, cable reactance and average conductor temperature during fault condition. Step 8 Select the size of CPC such that k tI S Ief,bkEF min ≥ For TT system check for: Ra x Ia < 50 V. Ia: the current causing the automatic disconnection of the protective device within 5s. Ra : resistances of the earth electrode and the CPC. Earth fault current IEF,, operating time of protective device. Thermal limit constant k of CPC. Resistance of earth electrode. Smin can also be obtained from Table 4.1 given in Section 4.3.1.
  • 145. Design Procedures and Examples 133 6.2.2 Socket-outlet Circuit Socket-outlet circuits can be fed by either radial or ring circuits. Figure 6.3a shows a radial circuit arrangement and in Figure 6.3b, a ring circuit utilises one additional conductor to loop back to the sending end. In other words, the socket outlets in the ring circuit are fed by two parallel conductors. The sharing of the load between the two parallel conductors will depend on the load distribution within the ring. For overcurrent protection, it is assumed that not more than 67% of the total current will be carried by any part of the ring. Such an assumption is based partly on experience and partly on a consideration of the likely load distribution in domestic circuits [Ref 6, P 25]. For other situations, such an assumption may need to be reviewed. 32A MCB 32A MCB (a) radial (b) ring Figure 6.3 Radial and ring circuits Prior to the release of the 15th Edition of the IEE Wiring Regulations in 1981, there were three standard circuit arrangements for socket outlets and each circuit can only supply to a fixed number of socket outlets. For example, a radial circuit using an overcurrent protective device of 32 A with a 4 mm2 copper conductor pvc-insulated cable was allowed to supply to only six socket outlets. In the 15th Edition of the IEE Regulations, for the same 32 A standard circuit, it was allowed to supply an unlimited number of socket outlets but within a floor area of 75 m2. In 1991, the standard circuit arrangements for socket outlets have been removed from the 16th Edition of the IEE Wiring Regulations [Ref 1] and the designer has to decide precisely what is needed. Example 6.2 Determine the type and current rating of the protective device and the size of conductors of the circuit feeding a group of ten socket outlets as shown in Figure 6.4. The length of the cable from the protective device to the group of the socket outlets is 17 m and the ambient temperature is 350C. The circuit is a single-core, copper conductor, pvc-insulated cable, clipped direct on a non-metallic surface. The expected average connected
  • 146. 134 Chapter 6 load of each socket outlet is 300 W at 0.9 power factor and the voltage drop limits in the final circuit are: (a) 1%, (b) 1.5%. 300W X 10 0.9 p.f. 1C/Cu/pvc clipped direct 17 m350 C ? Figure 6.4 Circuit for Example 6.2 Solution (a) Step 1 : θcosvoltagerated loadConnected IB × = A49.14 9.0230 10300 = × × = Step 2 : Assume the 3-phase fault current is within 9 kA and thus, an MCB with a current rating of 16 A is selected. Step 3 : A02.17 1194.0 16 CCC I I iga N min,t = ×× = ×× = Step 4 : From Table 4D1A of the IEE Wiring Regulation [Ref 1, P 188], a 2 x 1.5 mm2 cable with It = 20 A is selected. Step 5 : 1000 lengthIcosTVD V Br drop ×× = θ V43.6 1000 1749.149.029 = ××× = Since Vdrop of 6.43 V (2.8%) is higher than 1%, the next higher rating of 2.5 mm2 is selected. V99.3 1000 1749.149.018 V 5.2,drop = ××× = Since Vdrop of 3.99 V (1.74%) is again higher than 1%, the next higher rating of 4 mm2 is selected. V44.2 1000 1749.149.011 V 0.4,drop = ××× = Since Vdrop of 2.44 V (1.06%) is still higher than the required 1%, a 6 mm2 cable should be considered. However, the size of 6 mm2 cable will be too
  • 147. Design Procedures and Examples 135 large to terminate inside the socket outlet. Thus, the group of 10 socket outlets will be separated into two groups and to be fed by two separate circuits. Each circuit is protected by a 16 A MCB but the design current is only half of the previous value. By using a 2.5 mm cable, the voltage drop will be half of 3.99 V or 1.995 V (0.87%) which is less than the voltage drop limit of 1%. The recommended circuit arrangement is shown in Figure 6.5(a). (b) Since the voltage drop limit is 1.5%, the 4 mm2 cable with a voltage drop of 2.44 V (1.06%) is within the required limit, and thus a 4 mm2 cable is recommended as shown in Figure 6.5(b). 300W X 5 300W X 5 1C/Cu/pvc clipped direct 1C/Cu/pvc clipped direct 16A MCB 16A MCB 2 x 2.5mm 2 17 m 2 x 2.5mm 2 17 m Figure 6.5(a) Recommended circuit for 1- % voltage drop 1C/Cu/pvc clipped direct 300W X 10 16A MCB 2 x 4mm 2 17 m Figure 6.5(b) Recommended circuit for 1.5% voltage drop 6.2.3 Motor Circuit For motor circuit, the rating of the breaker and cable should be greater than or equal to the full load current of the motor. Where the motor is intended for intermittent duty and for frequent stopping and starting, the conductor size shall be increased to cater for any cumulative effects of the rise in circuit temperature during the starting periods. The IEE Regulation 552 states that for every electric motor having a rating exceeding 0.37 kW shall be provided with a starter incorporating
  • 148. 136 Chapter 6 means of protection against overload of the motor [Ref 1, 552-01-02]. For a motor circuit, the breaker is installed mainly for switching/isolation purpose and for short-circuit protection. Thus, it is not necessary for the breaker to provide overload protection for the cable since built-in overload protection is provided in the starter [Ref 2, 473-01-04]. Furthermore, the designer should consider the starting current to ensure that the breaker will not trip during motor starting. 6.3 EXAMPLES OF A TWO-LEVEL BUILDING A two-level building which has two shops on each floor is shown in Figure 6.6 and a pump room which has a 55 kW water pump and a 80-kW sprinkler pump operated by the utility. Each shop has a final DB serving a floor area of 15 m x 10 m. On each floor, there is a main DB connecting to two final DBs as shown in Figure 6.6. The connected loads of each shop are as follows: ♦ 20 units of 40-W fluorescent lighting. ♦ 28 units of 13-A socket outlets with an average connected load of 300 W for each socket outlet at a power factor of 0.9. ♦ One 3-Phase 10-kW compressor motor. ♦ One 3-Phase 15-kW direct-on-line motor. The power supply to the building is fed from a 22 / 0.4 kV transformer. The voltage drop limit from the supply intake to the main DB is specified as 1%, from main DB to final DB is 0.5% and from the final DB to each appliance is 1%. The ambient temperature is 350C. All cables are installed in trunking and every two circuits are grouped together. T1T1M1 M1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 M1 Figure 6.6 The two-level building
  • 149. Design Procedures and Examples 137 6.3.1 Final DB The circuit arrangement and phase connection of the appliances connected to the final DB in each shop are shown in Figure 6.7. Socket-outlet Circuits Red Phase : A28.21 18.094.0 16 I A16IA59.11 9.0230 8300 I min.t NB = ×× = == × × = Select a circuit using a 16-A MCB with a 2.5 mm2 copper conductor multi- core pvc-insulated non-armoured cable. Cable length: L = 4.5 m Voltage drop: Vdrop = 0.8418 V or 0.36% Circuit loading: LD = )(I IB Z = × ×11 59 23 0 94 0 8. . . = 67%, IZ = 17.3 A. Active connected load: CLa = 2.4 kW Reactive connected load: CLr = 2.4 x (tan (cos-1 0.9)) = 1.16 kVAr. M 16.5m 12x13A SSO 13.5m8.5m4.5m 21.6m20.6m 8x13A SSO 16.2m 15 kW10 kW 8x13A SSO B B R 3φ Y Y M T1 3φ Figure 6.7 Final DB connection and circuit l h Yellow phase : m16.2LA,21.28=IA,16=IA,59.11I mint,NB == To meet the required voltage drop limit of not exceeding 1%, a higher rating circuit of 16-A MCB and a 4 mm2 copper conductor multi-core cable is selected.
  • 150. 138 Chapter 6 kVAr1.16=CLkW,2.4=CL,51.2% 830x0.94x0. 11.59 =LD%,8.0 drop V ra== Blue Phase : m16.5=LA26.6=IA20A32.17 mint,== NB II To meet the required voltage drop limit of not exceeding 1%, the required conductor size exceeds 4 mm2. Thus, we can use a ring circuit of 20-A MCB and a 4 mm2 copper conductor multi-core cable. IB = 17.32 A IN = 20 A L = 16.5 m Iz = 45.12 A Vdrop = 1.415 V or 0.6% LD = 38.4% CLa = 3.6 kW CLr = 1.74 kVAr Lighting Circuit Yellow/Blue phase : A98.7 10.80.94 6 =IA,6IA,13.3 230 8.11040 I mint,NB = ×× == ×× = Select a circuit using a 6-A MCB and a 1.5 mm2 copper conductor cable. L=8.5 m, 13.5m Vdrop=0.28%, 0.45% LD=25.2 %, 25.2 % CLa=40 x 1.8 x 10 x 0.85 = 612 W CLr = 40 x 1.8 x 10 x 0.85 x tan (cos-10.85) = 379 VAr For lighting and socket-outlet circuits, it is assumed that the selected cables can withstand the short-circuit currents. An illustration of checking whether the cable can withstand the thermal limit during short-circuit condition is given in the design of the motor circuit. 10 kW Motor A05.20 8.09.04003 1010 PfEff4003 MotorofoutputNet I 3 B = ××× × = ××× = A67.26 18.094.0 05.20 IA25I min,tN = ×× == Select a circuit using a 25-A MCB and a 4 mm2 copper conductor cable. L = 20.6 m Vd = 3.139 V or 0.78% LD = 98.7% CLa = 10/0.9 = 11.11 kW CLr = 11.11 tan (cos-10.8) = 8.33 kVAr The motor starting current is assumed to be four times the full load current which is 80 A during the first 15 s. As the operating time of the
  • 151. Design Procedures and Examples 139 25-A type C MCB is 50 s, this circuit satisfies the requirement for motor starting. Based on the estimated 3-phase short circuit current of 1889 A, the calculated critical time (tcable,max) is 0.06 s. Since the operating time (tbk,3-Phase,F) of the 25-A MCB is 0.01 s, this circuit satisfies the requirement in Step 6. This circuit does not satisfy the requirement in Step 4, since the 25-A MCB will not operate for a current of 1.45 Iz (i.e. 29 A). However, this is acceptable. Why? 15-kW Motor A39.99=I32A=IA30.07=I mint,NB The motor starting current is assumed to be seven times the full load current which is 210 A during the first 10 s. As the operating time of the 32 A type C MCB is 9 s, the next higher MCB rating which is 40 A is selected. The operating time of the 40-A MCB is 11 s which is longer than the required 10 s and is thus acceptable. L = 21.6 m Vdrop = 1.975 V or 0.5% LD = 87% CLa = 15/0.9 = 16.67 kW CLr = 12.5 kVAr Tcable,max = 0.09 s tbk,3-Phase,F = 0.01 s If = 3810 A Since tcable,max is greater than tbk,3-Phase,F, it satisfies the requirement in Step 6. However, it does not satisfy the requirement in Step 4 since the 40-A MCB will not operate at a current of 1.45 Iz (50 A). DB Incoming Circuit Total active connected load : TCLa = (2.4+2.4+3.6+0.612+0.612+11.11+16.67) kW = 37.4 kW Total reactive connected load: TCLr = (1.16+1.16+1.74+0.38+0.38+8.33+12.5) kW = 25.65 kVAr Power factor = 825.0 4.37 65.25 tancos P Q tancos 11- =⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ =⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ − Step 1 : Select a demand factor of 0.8. The maximum demand or the design current of the incoming circuit is A35.528.0 825.04003 104.37 DF cos4003 TCL I 3 a B =× ×× × = × ×× = θ Step 2 : Select both MCCB and RCCB with IN = 63 A
  • 152. 140 Chapter 6 Step 3 : It,min = 63/(0.94 x 0.8) = 83.78 A Step 4 : Select a 35 mm2 copper conductor, pvc-insulated multi-core cable in trunking at a length of 18 m. Iz = 99 x 0.94 x 0.8 = 74.45 A. LD = 70.4% Step 5 : L = 16.4 m, IB = 52.35 A Vdrop = 0.93 V or 0.23% Step 6 : At an assumed fault current of 9 kA, tbk,3-Phase,F = 0.01 s and tcable,max = 0.09 s and thus tbk,3-Phase,F < t cable,max The single-line diagram for the final DB is shown in Figure 6.8 and the single-line diagram for the main DB connected to the two final DBs is shown in Figure 6.9. Figure 6.8 Single-line diagram of the Final DB T1
  • 153. Design Procedures and Examples 141 T1 29.9 kW 20.5 kVAr T1 29.9 kW 20.5 kVAr 4 x 35 mm2 52A (70.4%) 4 x 35 mm2 52A (70.4%) PVC-CU Multi Non-Arm (0.23%) PVC-CU Multi Non-Arm (0.23%) Spare (x2) MCCB TPN 100 A MCCB TPN 63 A MCCB TPN 63 A MD = 47.87kW, 32.85kVAr IB = 83.8A Fig 6.9 Single-line diagram of the main DB M1 6.3.2 Main switchboard Only three outgoing circuits are required in the main switchboard. The first circuit is a cable riser connecting the main DB in level 1 and the other main DB in level 2. The second and third circuits are connected to the 55- kW water pump and the 80-kW sprinkler pump respectively in the pump room. Cable Riser Using a coincidence factor of 0.9, the maximum demand of the riser is: A2.170 110.94 160 =I kA20=IandA,160=IwithMCCBaUse A8.1501000 4003 59.2+86.17 =I kVAR59.13=0.9xx 2)(32.85=MD kW86.17=0.9xx 2)(47.87=MD mint, BCN 22 B r a = ×× =× × Select a 4 x 50 mm2 single-core, pvc-insulated, copper conductor cable, installed on cable tray. This circuit has a tabulated current carrying capacity of 172 A. The voltage drop can be calculated by: ( ) ( ) V400of0.26%orV02.1 1000 98.150565.0165.0825.08.0 1000 lengthIinsTVD+cosTVD V Bxr drop = ×××+× = ×× = θθ
  • 154. 142 Chapter 6 Water Pump The design current of the 55-kW water pump is 110.3 A and a MCCB is selected. Using the same design procedure, we obtain: kVAr45.83=CLA117.3=I kW61.11=55/0.9=CLA160=I rmint, aN Select a 4 x 35 mm2 single-core, pvc-insulated, copper conductor cable which has a tabulated current carrying capacity of 129 A. Based on a circuit length of 19.5 m, the voltage drop is 2.11 V which is less than the specified voltage drop tolerance of 1%. Based on the motor starting current of 441 A, the operating time of the 160 A MCCB is higher than the required limit of 15 s. Sprinkler Pump The design current of the 80-kW sprinkler pump is 160.4 A and a MCCB rated at 200 A is selected. Based on the It,min of 170.6 A, a 4 x 70 mm2 copper conductor cable is suggested. This cable has a tabulated current rating of 214 A and the voltage drop is 0.63% at an estimated circuit length of 29.5 m. Based on the motor starting current of 642 A, the operating time of the 200-A MCCB is slightly greater than the required limit of 15 s. Main Incoming Circuit Select a MCCB as the protective device and based on the coincidence factor of 0.9, the maximum demand at the main incoming circuit is: ( ) ( ) MDa = + + × = × = × × = 86 18 6111 88 89 0 9 212 56 0 9 154 3 400 1000 379 . . . . . . .46 .3 kW MD = 59.12+ 45.83+ 66.67 kVAr I = 212.56 + 154.46 A I = 400 A r B 2 2 N The single line diagram of the main switchboard is shown in Figure 6.10. 6.3.3 Short-circuit Protection It is assumed that the main switchboard is fed by a 300 mm2 copper conductor XLPE multi-core cable from a LV board at a distance of 30 m. The LV board is fed by a 22/0.4-kV transformer that has a reactance of 0.009 Ω and a resistance of 0.002 Ω. It is also assumed that the 22-kV
  • 155. Design Procedures and Examples 143 source impedance is negligible and the 300 mm2 XLPE cable has a reactance of 0.07 mΩ per m and a resistance of 0.08 mΩ per m. The three-phase short-circuit current at the main switchboard is: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) A166,19 012.0 230 3000007.0009.03000008.0002.0 230 XXRR 3V ,I 22 2 1T 2 1T LL 3F == ×++×+ = +++ =φ Thus, all the MCCBs at the main switchboard are recommended to have a breaking capacity of 20 kA. To verify the thermal limit of cable as stated in Step 6, the critical operating time of the three outgoing circuits are calculated as follows: s18.0 19166 70115 =tpumpSprinkler s04.0 19166 35115 =tWater pump s09.0 19166 50115 I Sk tRiser 2 22 maxcable, 2 22 maxcable, 2 22 2 F 22 maxcable, = × = × = × == Figure 6.10 The main switchboard of the two-level building
  • 156. 144 Chapter 6 The operating time of each of the three MCCBs at a short-circuit current of 19 kA is 0.01 s which is within the three critical operating times calculated above. However, if the operating time of the breaker is 0.1 s, the first and second circuits will not meet the requirement for protection against short-circuit current. 6.4 EXAMPLE OF A SEVEN-STOREY FACTORY A seven-storey flatted factory which has four tenants on each floor is shown in Figure 6.11 and its basic single-line diagram is shown in Figure 6.12. The first busbar which provides supply to all the tenants is fed by a 22/0.4-kV transformer, the second busbar which provides supply to all the common services for the whole building such as lighting in the common area, ventilation fans and exhaust fans, etc. is fed by another 22/0.4-kV transformer. The third busbar which provides supply to all the emergency loads such as emergency lighting, fire-fighting equipment, etc. is fed from either the second busbar or the standby generator when the supply from the utility fails. ROOF LEVEL 5 LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 6 LEVEL 7 Figure 6.12 The basic single-line diagram G Busbar 3Busbar 2Busbar 1 400V400V 1MVA1MVA 22 kV Tenant Tenant TenantTenantT1 M1 LPEM T1 T1 T1 Figure 6.11 The seven-storey building
  • 157. Design Procedures and Examples 145 On each floor, there is one distribution board M1 connecting to the four tenants DBs, T1, and another distribution board LP which provides supply to all the common services in the building, and an emergency distribution board EM for emergency loads as shown in Figure 6.11. The area of each floor is 1000 m2 and each tenant occupies a floor area of 200 m2 . The average floor height is 4.5 m. The maximum demand of each DB is shown in Table 6.3. All the single loads connected directly to the main busbars are given in Table 6.4. Table 6.3 The maximum demand of DB on each floor DB Maximum Demand Source of Supply (kW) (kVAr) (Ampere) M1 134.6 94.2 237 Busbar 1 LP 32.1 20.4 55 Busbar 2 EM 20.1 12.8 34 Busbar 3 AHU 16.67 12.5 30 Busbar 2 Table 6.4 Single loads connected directly to the busbars Single Load Maximum Demand Floor Source of (kW) (kVAr) (Ampere) located Supply Lift Motor 1 33.3 25.0 60.1 8 busbar 2 Lift Motor 2 33.3 25.0 60.1 8 busbar 2 Chiller 44.4 33.3 80.1 8 busbar 2 Condense Pump 16.7 12.5 30.1 8 busbar 2 Lift Motor 3 33.3 25.0 60.1 8 busbar 3 Lift Motor 4 33.3 25.0 60.1 8 busbar 3 Water Pump 1 22.2 16.7 40.1 1 busbar 2 Water Pump 2 22.2 16.7 40.1 1 busbar 3 Sprinkler Pump 57.88 43.3 104.3 1 busbar 3 6.4.1 Busbar 1 Cable or busway riser can be used to connect from busbar 1 to the main distribution board M1 at each floor. It is assumed that each riser has a minimum rating of 225 A and a maximum rating of 800 A. The specified voltage drop limit is 1% from busbar 1 to each main DB. The designer may select one riser for each main DB since the maximum demand of each main DB is 237 A which is higher than the minimum riser size of 225 A. In this case, it will require seven outgoing circuits which implies seven breakers
  • 158. 146 Chapter 6 with the associated protective devices from busbar 1. On the other hand, the designer may select one riser connecting to as many main DBs as possible. As the maximum demand of each main DB is 237 A and the maximum riser rating is 800 A, the maximum number of main DBs which can be connected to one riser is three, subjected to the voltage drop constraints. In this example, three risers are recommended: the first riser is a cable riser connected to two main DBs at levels 7 and 6, the second riser is also a cable riser connected to two main DBs at levels 5 and 4 and the last riser is a busway riser connecting to three main DBs at levels 3, 2 and 1. The completed design of busbar 1 is shown in Figure 6.13. Figure 6.13 The design of busbar 1 6.4.2 Busbar 2 There are five single loads, namely one 20-kW water pump, two 30-kW lift motors, one 40 kW chiller and one 15 kW condenser pump to be connected directly from busbar 2. In addition, one distribution board LP and one tap- off supply for the air handling unit (AHU) are required at each floor to be
  • 159. Design Procedures and Examples 147 fed from busbar 2. It is also required that the supply for LP and the AHU should be on two separate risers. As the maximum demand for LP is 55 A, the designer can supply all the DBs by one riser. Alternatively, the designer can also provide the supply by using two risers. However, if it is supplied by more than two risers, each riser will be loaded less than 50% of the rated capacity and thus, it is not recommended. The maximum demand of each AHU is 30 A and for the same reason, only one riser is recommended to supply all the AHUs. The completed design of busbar 2 including the associated protective device for the incoming circuit is shown in Figure 6.14. Figure 6.14 The design of busbar 2 6.4.3. Busbar 3 There are four single loads, namely two 30-kW lift motors at the roof, one 20-kW water pump and one 52-kW sprinkler pump at level 1 to be connected directly from busbar 3. The emergency distribution board EM,
  • 160. 148 Chapter 6 which has a maximum demand of 34 A on each floor should also be fed from busbar 3. As the demand of EM is low, the designer should select only one riser from busbar 3. Due to the voltage drop requirement, the current ratings of the two lift motor circuits are actually much larger than those required for the full load current only. For emergency loads, as all the appliances will be required to operate simultaneously, the coincidence factor of 1.0 is selected. The completed design of busbar 3 is given in Figure 6.15. Figure 6.15 The design of busbar 3 6.4.4 Short-Circuit Protection The impedance of the 22/0.4-kV transformer is normally 5% on 1 MVA base. The three-phase short-circuit current in per unit of 1 MVA and 0.4 kV base is: currentp.u.20 05.0 1 I 3,F ==φ
  • 161. Design Procedures and Examples 149 kA28.86=kA1.44320=I A1443 1043 101 =currentp.u.1 F,3 3 6 × = ×× × φ It is also assumed that proper interlocking facility is implemented and thus, the two 22/0.4-kV transformers will never be operated in parallel. Under this assumption, the breaking capacity of the two ACBs and all the other MCCBs at busbar 1, busbar 2 and busbar 3 can be 30 kA which is higher than the critical limit of 28.86 kA. To verify the thermal limit of cable as stated in Step 6, the critical time of the first riser from busbar 1 is calculated: t k S Ic F = = × = 2 2 2 2 2 2 115 500 28860 3 97. s The value of 3.97 s is much larger than the breaker operating time of 0.01 s and thus, the cable is well protected. However, at busbar 2, the 4 x 16 mm2 circuit to the condenser pump fails to meet this requirement, as the critical time is less than the breaker’s operating time of 0.01s. s004.0 28860 16115 I Sk t 2 22 2 F 22 c = × == In actual case, the three-phase short circuit current at the roof will be much lower than 28 kA, and the critical time should be closer to the breaker operating time of 0.01 s if the impedance of the 4 x 16 mm2 circuit is considered. 6.4.5 Earth Fault Protection As the impedance of the 22/0.4-kV transformer is 5% and the typical X/R ratio of the transformer is 5, the value of the resistance and reactance of the transformer can be obtained by: Z R X R Z X R T T T T T T T = + = + = = = × = × = 2 2 2 1 5 5% 26 0 98% 5 5 0 98% 4 . . .9% The resistance and reactance in ohms can be obtained by multiplying the per unit value by the base impedance of 0.16 Ω.
  • 162. 150 Chapter 6 Ω=×= Ω=×= 0078.0049.016.0X 0016.00098.016.0R T T Let us assume that the earthing of the installation is a TN-S system and the protective conductor from the transformer neutral to the earthing terminal of busbar 2 is a 300 mm2 pvc-insulated, copper conductor cable of 25 m length, and the CPC from busbar 2 to the distribution board LP at level 1 is a 120 mm2 pvc-insulated copper conductor of 5 m length. The cable riser from busbar 2 to each LP is a 4 x 240 mm2 pvc-insulated, copper conductor cable as shown in Figure 6.16. The earth fault loop impedance at DB LP at level 1 is: ( ) ( )Z R R R R R X X X X XEFL T T where R R R X X X X = + + + + + + + + + = × × × = = × × = × × = = × × = = × × × = = × × = = × × = = × × = 500 240 120 300 2 500 240 120 300 2 500 240 300 500 240 120 300 0 086 25 3 1000 2 0 00062 016 5 3 1000 0 00046 0 00092 013 25 3 1000 0 0019 0135 25 3 1000 2 0 00098 0 22 5 3 1000 0 00064 0 23 5 3 1000 0 00066 0 22 25 3 1000 0 0032 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R = 0.32 5 3 1000 120 Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω ZEFL = + = 0 0055 0 01328 0 01437 2 2 . . . Ω The line-to-earth fault current is: A006,16 01437.0 230 IEF == To verify the size of CPC as stated in Step 8, the minimum cross-sectional area of the CPC from LP1 to busbar 2 is: 2 Ief,bkEF min mm4.35 143 1.0006,16 k tI S = × = ≥
  • 163. Design Procedures and Examples 151 The selected CPC size of 120 mm2 is thus more than the minimum required size of 35.4 mm2 (step 8). Fig 6.16 Illustration of earth fault loop impedance at level 1 In the distribution board LP at level 1, there is a socket-outlet circuit of 2 x 4 mm2 copper conductor cable with a 1 x 4 mm2 CPC of 15 m length protected by a type C 32 A MCB. The resistance values of the phase conductor and CPC are: Ω= Ω= × × = 0825.0R 0825.0 10002 1511 R 4,CPC 4 The earth fault current at the socket outlet is: ( ) A1345 171.0 230 01328.00825.00825.00055.0 230 I 22 LE,F == +++ = For a current of 1345 A, the 32-A MCB will operate within the specified time of 0.4 s (Step 7). The touch voltage for an earth fault at the appliance connected to the socket outlet if it is within the earthed equipotential zone is: ( ) ( ) V7.26 32000066.000092.00825.0 320XR+R= 320Z=V IZ=V 22 2 120,CPC 2 CPC,120CPC,4 CPCt ACPCt = ×++= ×+ × × The value of 26.7 V is within the maximum limit of 50 V. LP LP LP cpc 5 m 5 m 25 m 25 m 4 x 240mm2 7x500mm2 1 x 120mm2 1x300mm2 Busbar 2
  • 164. 152 Chapter 6 6.5 REFERENCES [1] “Regulations for Electrical Installations”, 16th Edition, IEE, 1991. [2] CP5 : 1988, “Code of Practice for Wiring of Electrical Equipment of Buildings”, SISIR, 1988/1995. [3] P J S Chram, “The National Electrical Code 1987 Handbook”, National Fire Protection Association, 4th Edition, 1987. [4] IEEE Standard 241-1983, “IEEE Recommended Practice for Electric Power Systems in Commercial Buildings”, IEEE, 1983. [5] “Guidance Note on Selection and Erection”, Guidance Note No. 1, IEE, 1992. [6] “Guidance Note on Protection against Overcurrent”, Guidance Note No. 6, IEE, 1992.
  • 165. 153 CHAPTER 7 CALCULATIONS OF SHORT-CIRCUIT CURRENTS Calculation of short-circuit currents in low-voltage systems is usually simpler than in high-voltage systems. Certain simplifying assumptions are made when calculating fault current. An important assumption is that the fault is shorted through a zero fault impedance. This assumption simplifies the calculation process and also applies a safety factor since the calculated values represent the worst case condition. Furthermore, a three-phase fault is usually assumed as this type of fault generally results in the maximum short-circuit current in a circuit. The actual fault current is normally less than the calculated three-phase value since the fault impedance may always be higher than zero. Line-to-line short-circuit currents are about 87% of the three-phase fault currents while line-to- neutral short-circuit currents are also lower than the three-phase fault currents. For a system with neutral solidly grounded, the line-to-earth short-circuit currents can range from 60% to 125% of the three-phase value depending on the construction of the ground-return circuit. However, the line-to-ground fault currents of more than the three-phase value rarely occurs in industrial and commercial systems. Calculation of short-circuit currents at various sections in a low-voltage system is essential for the proper selection of MCCBs, MCBs, fuses, busbars and cables. All of these electrical components should withstand the thermal and magnetic stresses imposed by the maximum possible short- circuit currents. In addition, circuit breakers and fuses should interrupt safely these maximum short-circuit currents. 7.1 SOURCES OF FAULT CURRENTS The basic sources of fault currents are the utility supply system, local generators, synchronous motors and induction motors. All the running generators in the utility system contribute to the fault current in a low- voltage system. However, transmission and distribution lines and transformers introduce impedances between the utility generators and the low voltage system. As a result, the contribution of these generators to the fault current in the low-voltage system is substantially reduced. Nevertheless, the utility system is still the main source of the fault
  • 166. 154 Chapter 7 currents. The amount of the short-circuit current from the utility system is normally expressed as the fault level at the service entrance. The value of the fault level should normally be obtained from the utility. Typical values of fault level at 22 kV are in the range of 300 MVA to 1000 MVA, and for 6.6 kV, in the range of 150 MVA to 200 MVA. For intake at 400 V, the fault level is in the range from 15 MVA to 25 MVA. Fault current contributed from a local generator decreases exponentially from a high initial value to a lower steady-state value which is equivalent to the current generated by a constant voltage behind a variable reactance. As the generator continues to be driven by its prime mover and to have its field energised from its exciter, the steady-state value of fault current will persist. For purposes of fault-current calculations, industry standards have established three specific names for values of this variable reactance, namely sub-transient reactance (Xd ” ), transient reactance (Xd ’ ) and synchronous reactance (Xd ). Xd ” determines the fault current during the first cycle (up to 0.02 second) after a fault occurs. The reactance increases to Xd ’ which is used to determine the fault current from 0.5 to 2 seconds. The reactance will then increase to X which determines the current flow after steady-state condition is reached. In low-voltage systems, as the protective devices such as MCCBs, MCBs or fuses are activated mostly within the first cycle by the primary current, X d d ” is recommended for the calculation of fault current contributed by the local generator. Typical values for Xd ” are in the range from 10% to 15% on generator kVA rating. The fault current contributed from induction motor is generated by inertia driving the motor in the presence of a field flux produced by induction from the stator. Since this flux decays on a loss of the source voltage or on a substantial reduction of the source voltage during fault, the current contribution of an induction motor reduces and disappears completely after a few cycles. In the calculation of the fault current, induction motors are assigned only a sub-transient reactance Xd ” . A typical value for Xd ” is 25% based on the individual motor kVA rating or on the total kVA of a group of motors. 7.2 STEP-BY-STEP CALCULATIONS The example of the fault calculation presented here is based on a 400-V three-phase system shown in Figure 7.1. The system data shown are typical of those required to perform the calculations. Bolted three-phase short
  • 167. Calculations of Short-Circuit Currents 155 circuits at locations F1 and F2 are assumed separately. Resistances are usually significant and their effect may be evaluated either by a complex impedance reduction or by separate X and R reductions. The complex reduction leads to the most accurate solution but the separate X and R reductions are simpler and more conservative. Thus, the latter is adopted in all the step-by-step calculations. 7.2.1 Common Base Values The base MVA is selected as 1 MVA and the base kV as 0.4 kV. The base impedance and base current can than be obtained as follows : ( ) ( ) ( ) Base Impedance = base kV base MVA = (0.4) 1 = 0.16 Base current = base MVA 1000 base kV 1 1000 0.4 3 1443 A 2 2 Ω × × = × × = 3 Utility Fault Level The utility fault level is given as 800 MVA with a X/R ratio of 15. The values for the common base of the equivalent utility resistance (Ru) and reactance (Xu) can be obtained as follows: ( ) Z Base MVA Fault MVA 1 800 0.00125 per unit since Z = R X and X / R = 15 R = Z 1+ 15 0.00125 15.033 0.000083 per unit X = 15 R = 0.00125 per unit U U U 2 U 2 U U U s 2 U U = = = + = = × Transformer Impedance The 1000 kVA transformer has an impedance of 5.75% on 1000 kVA and the value of resistance is 1.21%. The reactance can be obtained by Z R 5.62%2 2 − = .
  • 168. 156 Chapter 7 22KV Fault level = 800MVA X/R = 15 400 V 500A TPN MCCB 500A TPN MCCB 4x300mm Cu/pvc/pvc (100m) on cable tray F1 F2 Motor group M1 400 kVA 630A TPN MCCB 1000 kVA Z = 5.75% R = 1.21% Main DB 200A TPN MCCB 4x70mm Cu/pvc/pvc (30m) on cable tray 2 Figure 7.1 Sample network As the transformer rating of 1000 kVA is the same as the base MVA, the percentage values of the transformer resistance (RT) and reactance (XT) remain the same. R 1.21 0.0121 per unit X = 5.62 0.0562 per unit T 0 0 T 0 0 = = = 300mm2 Cable The resistance and reactance values of the 300 mm2 cable can be obtained from table 4D1B of the IEE Wiring Regulations. The resistance is (0.00013 Ω) / 3 per m, and the reactance is (0.00014 Ω)/ 3 per m. The per unit values of resistance (R300c) and reactance (X300c) for 100 m of the 300 mm2 cable can be obtained as follows : 630A TPN MCCB 4x400mm Cu/pvc/pvc (66m) on cable tray Motor group M2 500 kVA 2 2
  • 169. Calculations of Short-Circuit Currents 157 R 0.00013 100 3 0.16 0.0469 per unit X = 0.00014 100 3 0.16 0.0505 per unit 300c 300c = × × = × × = 400 mm2 Cable The per unit values of the resistance and reactance of the 400 mm2 cable for a length of 66 m can be obtained as follows : R 0.000105 66 3 0.16 0.025 per unit X = 0.00014 66 3 0.16 0.033 per unit 400c 400c = × × = × × = 70 mm2 Cable The values of the resistance and reactance of the 70 mm2 cable for a length of 30 m are: R 0.00055 30 3 0.16 0.0595 per unit X = 0.0016 30 3 0.16 0.01732 per unit 70c 70c = × × = × × = Motor Groups The average sub-transient reactance is 25% based on the total rating of a group of motors. Based on a typical X/R ratio of 6, the resistance is 25%/6 = 4.167%. The values of the equivalent resistance and reactance converted to the common base for the motor groups M1 and M2 are: R 0.04167 1000 400 0.1042 per unit X = 0.25 1000 400 0.625 per unit R = 0.04167 1000 500 0.0833 per unit X = 0.25 1000 500 0.5 per unit M1 M1 M2 M2 = × = × = × = × =
  • 170. 158 Chapter 7 7.2.2 Fault at Location F1 The equivalent resistance and reactance networks for the fault at F1 are shown in Figure 7.2 and Figure 7.3 respectively. R400c = 0.025 R1 = 0.000083 RT = 0.0121 RM1 = 0.1042 RM2 = 0.0833 R300C = 0.0469 F1 Figure 7.2 Equivalent resistance network for Fault at F1 Figure 7.3 Equivalent reactance network for fault at F1 X1 = 0.00125 XT = 0.0562 XM1 = 0.625 XM2 = 0.5 X300C = X400c = 0.033 F1 The equivalent resistance Req and reactance Xeq are : ( ) ( ) ( )R R R / / R R / / R R 1 1 0.00083 0.0121 1 0.1042 0.0469 1 0.0833 0.025 1 82.08 6.618 9.234 1 97.932 0.01021 per unit eq u T M1 300c M2 400c= + + + = + + + + + = + + = =
  • 171. Calculations of Short-Circuit Currents 159 ( ) ( ) ( )X = X + X / / X + X / / X + X 1 1 0.00125 0.0562 1 0.625 0.0505 1 0.5 0.033 1 17.41 1.48 1.88 0.04814 per unit eq U T M1 300c M2 400c = + + + + + = + + = The equivalent per unit impedance and the fault current at F1 are : ( ) ( )Z R X 0.01021 0.04814 = 0.0492eq,F1 eq 2 eq 2 2 2 = + = + per unit I 1 0.0492 20.325 per unitf = = kA29.329= 20.325A4431If1 ×= The X/R ratio of the system impedance for the fault at F1 is : X R 0.04814 0.01021 4.715= = 7.2.3 Fault at Location F2 The equivalent resistance and reactance network for the fault at F2 are shown in Figure 7.4 and Figure 7.5 respectively. RU = 0.000083 RT = 0.0121 RM1 = 0.1042 RM2 = 0.0833 R300C = 0.0469 R400c = 0.025 F2 Figure 7.4 Equivalent resistance network for fault at F2
  • 172. 160 Chapter 7 XU = 0.00125 XT = 0.0562 XM1 = 0.625 XM2 = 0.5 X300c = 0.0505 X400c = 0.033 F2 Figure 7.5 Equivalent reactance network for fault at F2 The equivalent resistance Req and reactance Xeq for the fault at F2 are: unitper0.0372 05785.0 1 0.1042 1 1 0.010950.0469 1 0.1042 1 1 R ))R(R)//RR((R)//R(R eq 400cM2Tu300cM1eq = + = + + = +++= unitper0.0879 0.05190.0505 1 0.625 1 1 = ))X)//(XX(X)//(X(XX 400cM2Tu300cM1eq = + + +++= The equivalent impedance Zeq and fault current at F2 are : unit0.0954 per20.087920.0372)X(2)R(F2eq,Z 2 eqeq =+=+=
  • 173. Calculations of Short-Circuit Currents 161 I 1 0.0954 10.48 per unit currentF2,p.u. = = I 1443 10.48 = 15.123kA F2 = × The X/R ratio of the system impedance for the fault at F2 is : X R 0.0879 0.0372 2.36= = 7.3 SYSTEMATIC CALCULATION BY COMPUTER By referring to the same common base, the sample network can be re- arranged to a network consisting of 4 nodes and 3 lines as shown in Figure 7.6(a). The complex impedance network in Figure 7.6(a) can also be re- arranged to a simplified impedance network by using Z R X2 2 = + for each circuit element as shown in Figure 7.6(b). The admittance matrix (called Y-matrix) can then be formulated for the 4-node system as follows : y11 1 0.05875 1 0.06892 1 0.0414 1 0.06197 71.82 y12 - 1 0.0689 - 14.51 y13 - 1 0.0414 = - 24.15 y14 - 1 0.0620 - 16.14 y22 1 0.0689 1 0.6336 16.09 y33 1 0.0414 1 0.5069 26.12 y44 1 0.0620 16.14 = + + + = = = = = = = + = = + = = = The Y-matrix and the inverted Y-matrix are as follows: Y 71.820 14.510 24.150 16.140 14.510 16.090 0.000 0.000 24.150 0.000 26.120 0.000 16.140 0.000 0.000 16.140 = − − − − − − ⎡ ⎣ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎤ ⎦ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥
  • 174. 162 Chapter 7 Y 1 0.0493 0.0444 0.0456 0.0493 0.0444 0.1022 0.0411 0.0444 0.0456 0.0411 0.0804 0.0456 0.0493 0.0444 0.0456 0.1113 − = ⎡ ⎣ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎤ ⎦ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ Figure 7.6(a) Complex Representation Let z11 denotes the first diagonal element, z22 the second diagonal element and znn the last diagonal element of the inverse of the Y-matrix. The total fault current at any particular node (say node q) can be obtained by 1/zqq. Thus, the fault current for the fault at location F1 can be obtained by : kA29.264unitper20.28 0.0493 1 z 1 I 11 F1 ==== The fault current at location F2 is: kA14.113unitper9.78 0.1022 1 z 1 I 22 F2 ==== Similarly, the fault current at node 3 is 1/z33 and at node 4 is 1/z44. In addition, the distribution of the fault currents can also be calculated. The computational flow chart is shown in Figure 7.7. A display of the total fault current and its distribution in amperes for a fault at node 1 through node 4 are shown in Figure 7.8 through Figure 7.11 respectively. R300C X300C R70C X70C RM1 XM1 R400C X400C RM2 XM2 RU + RT XU + XT 1 2 3 4
  • 175. Calculations of Short-Circuit Currents 163 Z70C = 0.0620 1 2 3 4 Figure 7.6(b) Simplified Representation These calculated fault currents are slightly lower than the values obtained by the step-by-step calculation using the separate X and R reduction. If more accurate values are required, the Y-matrix should be formulated as a complex matrix and inverted using the complex representation. Formulate Y Matrix Compute Post Fault Voltage : V Z Zi f iq qq = 1 − Compute Total Fault Current : i Zq qq = 1 Read Bus Data and Line Data Compute [ ]Y −1 Compute Post Fault Current : I V V V F F F 12 1 2 12 = − STOP Figure 7.7 Computational flow chart ZU + ZT = 0.05875 Z300C = 0.0689 Z400C = 0.0414 ZM1 = 0.6336 ZM2 = 0.5069
  • 176. 164 Chapter 7 Figure 7.8 Total Fault current for a 3-phase fault at each node Figure 7.9 Fault current distribution for fault at node F2 (14.438 kA) Figure 7.10 Fault current distribution for fault at node M2 (18.254 kA)
  • 177. Calculations of Short-Circuit Currents 165 Figure 7.11 Fault current distribution for fault at node F1 (29.317 kA) 7.4 A CASE STUDY The electricity supply to a high-rise luxurious apartment is fed by a 1 MVA 22/0.4-kV transformer located on the ground floor of the building. The schematic diagram of part of the electrical installation is shown in Figure 7.12. As some of the distribution boards on the lower floors are closer to the transformer, the fault level at these apartment DBs will be high. However, by mistake, the contractor has installed the M6 MCBs in all the apartment DBs. Since the M6 MCBs have a breaking capacity of 6 kA, the utility company insisted all the MCBs be replaced with M9 MCBs which have a breaking capacity of 9 kA. This case study was conducted to examine whether the replacement of MCB was essential or not. In the fault current calculation, all the utility’s generators are represented by a single equivalent impedance. The impedance value is determined by an assumed fault level of 1000 MVA at 22 kV. This is a very conservative assumption as the switchgear at 22 kV is rated at 1000 MVA. The impedance of the 22-kV/LV transformer is assumed as 5%. For the entire three-phase network, per-unit values are used to determine the three-phase fault current. For the single-phase network, the representation of system elements is in ohm which provides an easier and more straight-forward calculation. Two different methods are illustrated and compared. 7.4.1 Method A The single-phase representation of a three-phase balanced system uses per-phase impedances and the line-to-neutral system driving voltage. All
  • 178. 166 Chapter 7 calculations up to the floor DB use per-unit values for impedances and voltages. However, from the floor DB to each apartment DB, impedances in ohms and voltages in volts are used to determine the fault current for the line-to-neutral short-circuit. All the cable impedances are based on Table 4D1B of the IEE Wiring Regulations using half of the single-phase tabulated voltage-drop constant as the per-phase per-metre cable impedance. 2 x 35 mm2 Cu/PVC cable in trunking DB1 DB2 DB3 DB4 Apartment DBs 8 m 14 m 21 m 31 m 100A DP MCCB 250A TPN MCCB (Floor DB) 250A TPN First tap-off unit 400A TPN MCCB 1600A TPN ACB 400 V 22 kV 1 MVA 5 % Fault level = 1000MVA 4 x 120 mm2 Cu/PVC/PVC on cable tray, 2m 4 x 300 mm2 Cu/PVC/PVC on cable tray, 28m 7 x 500 mm2 Cu/PVC/PVC in cable trench, 10m Figure 7.12 Schematic diagram of the electrical installation For the per-unit calculation, values of the base MVA and base kV are as follows: ( ) ( ) ( ) At 22 kV : Base MVA = 1 MVA Base kV = 22 kV At 400 V : Base MVA = 1 MVA Base kV = 400 V Base Impedance = base kV 2 base MVA 0.4 2 1 0.16 Base current = base MVA 1000 3 base kV 1000 3 0.4 1443 A V = 400 / 3 230.9 V 231 VLN = = = × = = = Ω
  • 179. Calculations of Short-Circuit Currents 167 For a fault level of 1000 MVA at 22 kV, the per-unit impedance (Z) is: Z = 1 1000 0.001 p.u.= Fault Current at Transformer LV Terminal The equivalent circuit for the fault at the transformer LV terminal is shown in Figure 7.13. T/F ImpedancePUB Equivalent Impedance 0.001 p.u. 0.05 p.u. V = 1.0 p.u. IF Figure 7.13 Equivalent circuit at LV terminal The three-phase fault current at LV terminal is : I . = 1 0.001+ 0.05 1 0.051 19.61 p.u. current I 1443 x 19.61= 28,297 A F, LV, p. u F,LV = = = Fault Current at the Main Switchboard The per-phase impedance of the 7 x 500 mm2 pvc-insulated copper conductor cable in a cable trench (installation method 1, 10 m and two cables per phase) is: Z 0.185 0.5 10 10 0.5 0.0004625 500 3 = × × × × = − Ω Ω Z . = 0.0004625 0.16 0.002891 p.u.500, p. u = The equivalent circuit for the fault at the main switchboard is shown in Figure 7.14 and the three-phase fault current at the main switchboard is : I . = 1 0.001 + 0.05 + 0.002891 18.556 p.u.F, MS, p. u = A26,776=18.556A1443=I MSF, ×
  • 180. 168 Chapter 7 0.002891 p.u.0.05 p.u.0.001 p.u. Figure 7.14 Equivalent circuit at the main switchboard Fault Current at First Tap-off Unit The per-phase impedance of the 4 x 300 mm2 pvc-insulated copper conductor cable on a cable tray (installation method 11, 28 metres) is : Z300 = 0.22 x 0.5 x 28 x 10-3 Ω = 0.00308 Ω Z . = 0.00308 0.16 0.01925 p.u. 300, p. u = The equivalent circuit for the fault at the first tap-off unit is shown in Figure 7.15 and the three-phase fault current at the first tap-off is : I = 1 0.001+ 0.05 + 0.002891+ 0.01925 F,TAP1,p.u. = 1 0.07314 13.6724 p.u.= I 1443 x 13.6724 = 19,729 AF,TAP1 = Figure 7.15 Equivalent circuit at the first tap-off unit Impedance of 500 mm2 cable IF V = 1.0 p.u. Impedance of 300 mm2 cable 0.002891 p.u.0.05 p.u.0.001 p.u. V = 1.0 p.u. 0.01925 p.u. IF
  • 181. Calculations of Short-Circuit Currents 169 Fault Current at Floor DB The per-phase impedance of the 4 x 120 mm2 pvc-insulated copper conductor cable on cable tray (installation method 11, 2 metre) is : Z120 = 0.41 x 0.5 x 2 x 10-3 Ω = 0.00041 Ω Z 0.00041 0.16 0.0025625 p.u.120,p.u. = = The equivalent circuit for fault at the floor DB is shown in Figure 7.16 and the three-phase fault current at the floor DB is: I . 1 0.001 0.05 0.002891 0.01925 0.0025625 1 0.757 13.21 p.u. F, DBF, p. u = + + + + = = A19,062=13.21A1443I DBFF, ×= Impedance of 120 mm2 cable 0.002891 p.u. 0.05 p.u.0.001 p.u. V = 1.0 p.u. 0.01925 p.u. 0.025625 p.u. IF Figure 7.16 Equivalent circuit floor DB Fault Current at Apartment DB To calculate the line-to-neutral short-circuit current at each apartment DB, the line-to-neutral voltage behind an internal impedance from each apartment DB to the utility infeed is applied. The equivalent circuit is shown in Figure 7.17. Impedance of 35 mm2 cable Equivalent Impedance from the floor DB to utility infeedVLN IF Figure 7.17 Equivalent circuit at apartment DB by method A
  • 182. 170 Chapter 7 The equivalent impedance from the floor DB to the supply intake at 22 kV is : Z V I 231 19,062 0.01212eq,DBF LN F,DBF = = = Ω The impedances of the 2 × 35 mm2 pvc-insulated copper conductor cables in trunking (installation method 3, 8 m for DB1, 14 m for DB2, 21 m for DB3, and 31 m for DB4) are: Z 1.3 0.5 8 10 0.0052 Z 1.3 0.5 14 10 0.0091 Z 1.3 0.5 21 10 0.01365 Z 1.3 0.5 31 10 0.02015 DB1 3 DB2 3 DB3 3 DB4 3 = × × × = = × × × = = × × × = = × × × = − − − − Ω Ω Ω Ω The fault current at the four apartment DBs are : I 231 0.01212 0.0052 0.0052 10,258 AF,DB1 = + + = I 231 0.01212 0.0091 0.0091 7,619 AF,DB2 = + + = I 231 0.01212 0.01365 0.01365 5,860 AF,DB3 = + + = I 231 0.01212 0.02015 0.02015 4,407 AF,DB4 = + + = 7.4.2 Method B In method A, the three-phase fault level at the floor DB is calculated first, and then a single-phase equivalent is used to calculate the fault level at each apartment DB. As the main focus of the analysis is to estimate the fault level for line-to-neutral at each apartment DB and not to estimate the fault level at other locations, the more accurate method should be based on a single-phase equivalent at the LV terminal of the 22 kV/LV transformer. As the three-phase fault level at the transformer’s LV terminal has been calculated as 28,297 A in section 7.4.1, the single-phase equivalent impedance at the LV terminal can be expressed as : Z V I 231 28,297 0.00817eq,LV LN F,LV = = = Ω
  • 183. Calculations of Short-Circuit Currents 171 The equivalent circuit for the line-to-neutral short-circuit at the apartment DB is shown in Figure 7.18. 1 x 120mm2 1 x 35mm2 1 x 35mm2 1 x 300mm2 2 x 500mm2 Equivalent source impedance at T/F LV terminal 0.00817Ω VLN 1 x 120mm2 1 x 300mm2 Figure 7.18 Equivalent circuit at apartment DB by method B The per-phase impedance of the 500 mm2 cable has to be divided by two as there are two cables per-phase, however, division is not necessary for the neutral cable as there is only one 500 mm2 cable for the neutral. The per- phase impedance in ohms for each cable which has been calculated from section 7.4.1 is summarized in Table 7.1. The total cable impedance from the transformer’s LV terminal to the floor DB during a line-to-neutral short-circuit at the apartment DB is : Z 0.0004625 0.000925 2 (0.00308 0.00041) 0.008368DBF = + + × + = Ω The fault current at each apartment DB can thus be calculated by : I 231 Z Z 2 Z 231 0.00817 0.008368 2 Z F,DB eq,LV DBF 35 35 = + + × = + + × The line-to-neutral source impedance at each apartment DB and the fault currents are summarized in Table 7.2. 7.4.3 Accuracy and Comparison For the exact calculation, cable impedance should not be added directly as the impedance Z is a complex quantity containing the resistance R and reactance X expressed in the form of R + jX. The resistance and reactance must be added separately and then Z can be computed by Z = R XT T 22 + . The approximate approach by adding all the impedances will result in slightly higher total impedance and thus the calculated fault current can be slightly lower. 1 x 500mm2 IF
  • 184. 172 Chapter 7 Table 7.1 Summary of Cable Impedance Cable size (mm2 ) Cable length (m) Impedance (ohm) 2 × 500 10 0.0004625 1 × 500 10 0.000925 1 × 300 28 0.00308 1 × 120 2 0.00041 1 × 35 8 0.0052 1 × 35 14 0.0091 1 × 35 21 0.01365 1 × 35 31 0.02015 Table 7.2 Line-to-Neutral Fault Current at each DB Location Cable length (m) Source Impedance (Ω) * Fault Current (A) DB1 8 0.02694 8,575 DB2 14 0.03474 6,649 DB3 21 0.04384 5,269 DB4 31 0.05684 4,064 * The equivalent source impedance is (Zeq,LV + ZDBF + 2×Z35) Ω Table 7.3 Fault Current Calculated by Two Methods Type of Fault Location Method A Method B 3-phase T/F LV Terminal 28, 297 28, 297 3-phase Main Busbar 26, 776 - 3-phase First tap-off Unit 19, 729 - 3-phase Floor DB 19, 062 - L - N Apartment DB1 10, 258 8, 575 L - N Apartment DB2 7, 619 6, 649 L - N Apartment DB3 5, 860 5, 269 L - N Apartment DB4 4, 407 4, 064 To determine only the line-to-neutral short-circuit current at the apartment DB, results obtained by method A are not recommended. For a line-to-neutral short-circuit, the fault current returns from the faulted point through each section of the neutral conductors up to the LV terminal of the 22 kV/LV transformer. By calculating a 3-phase fault level at the floor DB and then transferring to a single-phase equivalent source impedance at the floor DB may not represent accurately the line-to-neutral short-circuit at the apartment DB. Thus, the results obtained by method B that utilises a single-phase equivalent source impedance at the LV terminal of the 22 kV/LV transformer are recommended. The calculated fault currents by the two methods are summarised in Table⋅7.3.
  • 185. 173 CHAPTER 8 COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN AND SIMULATION For many years, the design of electrical installations in buildings has been done manually. The work involved is rather tedious, time consuming and repetitive in nature. The designers may not have the time and resources to make a complete check on every item of the installation designed by them. With the availability of computer facilities, the design, calculation, modelling and checking processes can be done in a more efficient and effective manner. Building structure and the large volume of design elements such as various types of cables and their installation methods, various types of circuit breakers and their time-current characteristics, can now be streamlined into a record structure. Technical analysis, assessment and costing can all be done by computers. The presentation of the completed design in a single-line diagram can also be automated. 8.1 DESIGN ELEMENT REPRESENTATION During the design process, instead of referring to various cable tables, catalogues for various types of breakers, etc., a computer-aided design (CAD) package, which normally provides one master file or many structured files to store all the design elements, may be used. These files contain all the required technical specifications and unit cost for all the electrical parts including various types of cables, busways, busbars, meters and a whole range of breakers. Facilities are normally provided for the designer to update and/or add on new elements to the relevant design element files whenever required. During runtime and at each design stage, through the interactive dialogue with the designer, the CAD package will select the relevant files and display a number of records, with the relevant technical specifications, for the required design element. Cable Data In a typical CAD package, VipTein [Ref. 1], most of the cable tables in Appendix 4 of the IEE Wiring Regulations [Ref. 2] are grouped according to the installation methods, conductor material, insulation material, and the cable construction methods. They are classified into twelve element files for copper conductor cables, two element files for mineral insulated copper conductor cables (MICC) and another twelve element files for aluminium
  • 186. 174 Chapter 8 conductor cables. These files are named and referred according to the definition as shown in Table 8.1. Table 8.1 Cables File Identification Installation Methods Conductor and Insulation Material Construction M1 Clipped direct D Copper/pvc 1 Single-core non-armoured M3 Conduit/Trunking E Copper/XLPE 2 Multi-core non-armoured M11 Cable Tray J Copper/MICC 3 Single-core armoured M12 Free air 4 Multi-core armoured For example, file M1D1 refers to the cable element file for copper conductors, pvc-insulated, clipped direct, single-core non-armoured cables. File M11D4 refers to the cable element file for copper conductors, pvc- insulated, installed on tray, multi-core-armoured cables. For each cable element file, each record contains the size of the conductor’s cross- sectional area, current rating, voltage drop constant, R value, X value and the cable cost per metre for both the single-phase cable and three-phase cable. Figure 8.1 shows 3 pop-up windows for selection of cable types and installation methods. Figure 8.2 shows a pop-up window containing the technical parameters of four relevant sizes of cables, together with another pop-up window indicating the voltage drop of the cable under consideration. The declaration of the cable data structure in Turbo Pascal is shown in Figure 8.3. Breaker Data Breakers are grouped under six element files, namely air circuit-breaker (ACB), single-phase MCB (MCB1), three-phase MCB (MCB3), moulded case circuit-breaker (MCCB), single-phase RCCB (RCCB1), and three-phase RCCB (RCCB3). In the breaker element files, each record contains the current rating, voltage rating, breaking capacity, type of instantaneous tripping, unit cost, thermal tripping time constants A and B, and the value of instantaneous tripping current. A typical display of short-circuit protection test with breaker tripping curves are shown in Figure 8.4. The declaration of the breaker data structure in Pascal is shown in Figure 8.5. Other Data There are two element files for busbars, one element file for busway systems and one element file for standby generators. Typical number of records in each element file may vary from 20 records in the generator file to 150 records in the breaker element file.
  • 187. Computer-aided Design and Simulation 175 Figure 8.1 Selection of cable types and installation methods Figure 8.2 Selection of cable sizes
  • 188. 176 Chapter 8 SpecRec = record i, r, x : real; End; Cable_rec = record Xsectarea : real; (* e.g. 25 mm2 *) Costpm : real; (* e.g. $8 per m *) S_pu : SpecRec; (* e.g. i = 126 A, r = 1.75mΩ/m, x = 0.2mΩ/m for Single-phase *) T_pu : SpecRec; (* e.g. i = 112 A, r = 1.50mΩ/m, x = 0.175mΩ/m for 3-phase *) End; Figure 8.3 Declaration of cable data structure in Pascal Figure 8.4 Short-circuit protection test with breaker tripping curves Brk_rec = record IRating : integer; (* e.g. 63 A *) VRating : integer; (* e.g. 415 V *) Bkcap : byte; (* e.g. 9 kA *) CBType : str3; (* e.g. Type3 *) Cost : real; (* e.g. $61.00 *) Curve_A : real; (* e.g. 119.2 *) Curve_B : real; (* e.g. 190.0 *) IMax : real; (* e.g. 630 A Instantaneous tripping current *) End; Figure 8.5 Declaration of breaker data structure in Pascal
  • 189. Computer-aided Design and Simulation 177 8.2 DESIGN METHODS AND DESIGN FILES Prior to the design of an electrical installation, the designer has to know the types of load, the wattage, the power factor, and the physical location of each connected load, the floor plan, the number of floors and the height of each floor. A normal CAD package should provide dedicated file structure for the designer to specify the building structure and the specifications of various types of load in the building. A CAD package should be able to display the layout of the building and enable the designer to zoom in and out to complete the design of the whole electrical installation. Design Methods Basically, there are two design methods [Ref. 3] commonly used in a CAD implementation. Design method 1 is based on the standard design files which are summarised from a large pool of proven designs and grouped under different categories, such as commercial complex, condominium, multi-storey flatted factory and high-rise domestic flat. The designer may display, alter, delete or insert new circuits/DBs, and copy the completed design to a new design file. Design method 2 is normally based on a computer dialogue. It is used when the designer’s idea is very much different from the standard design files. This method involves the design of all the final DBs, main DBs and the main switchboard. The design work is initiated circuit by circuit starting from a final DB. Based on the specified connected load, the CAD package calculates the design current and determines the type of breaker, breaker ratings, cable type, installation method, cable size, circuit length, voltage drop, etc. At each stage, the design current is shown and the designer has an option to overwrite the value selected by the package. In such case, a list of appropriate values will be displayed and the designer may select the appropriate value at his own discretion. Design File The completed design for a particular building should be stored in a master design file or several related design files. Normally, it is divided into two sections, namely, the main switchboard and the distribution boards. The specifications of the main switchboard can be stored in one file which contains the building information and the specifications of the incoming circuit and every outgoing circuits. The distribution board sections may
  • 190. 178 Chapter 8 consist of many small files. Each file stores the specification of one distribution board. Each outgoing circuit of the main switchboard may be connected to a distribution board or a directly connected load such as water pump, fire pump, etc. If it is connected to a DB, the connection identification refers to the file name of the connected DB, such as M1, T1, etc. If it is connected to a load, the connection identification refers to the name of the directly connected load such as water pump, sprinkler pump, etc. The specification of each incoming and outgoing circuit in the main switchboard or in the DB files contains the busbar identification, feeder position identification, cable specification (cable filename and record number), breaker specification (breaker filename and record number), the maximum demand in watts and VArs, etc. For example, if the completed design for a shophouse is identified as SH1, the filename of the main design file will be SH1.DES. If there are two types of DBs, namely M1 and T1 connected at the outgoing circuit from the main switchboard, the design files of the two DBs are M1.SH1 and S1.SH1. A sample main design file SH1.DES of a two-storey shophouse is shown in Figure 8.6, distribution board design file, M1.SH1 in Figure 8.7 and another distribution board design file, T1.SH1 in Figure 8.8. 8.3 ASSESSMENT AND COSTING The assessment and costing of the completed design can also be integrated to the CAD implementation. Based on the completed design files, the assessment module usually includes load simulation to estimate the loading of each individual circuit to detect overcurrent; voltage drop simulation to identify those circuits which have their voltage drop exceeding the specified tolerance; and fault level calculations to verify that all the breakers have adequate breaking capacity and that all the circuits can withstand the short-circuit currents. It may also include verification of discrimination among various protective devices and the checking with the recommended code of practice and regulations [Ref.4]. Based on the design files, the costing module gives the overall cost with breakdown for each category, such as circuit breakers, busbars, cables, DBs, etc. The costing module normally adds up the project cost by going through the material cost and installation cost of each category. The program commences with the first category and checks through the design
  • 191. Computer-aided Design and Simulation 179 files circuit by circuit for all the items to obtain the total cost for the first category. It then proceeds to the next category until the end of the last category. A sample printout [Ref. 4] of the costing module for a particular design, XYZ.DES is shown in Figure 8.9. SH10 0.0 2 4.5 1 1 0 Gen 1 CuBbar 5 P2 1 2 0 0 203940 151760 MCCB104 1 1 BUSWAY 0 MCCB 64 76600 56120 2 MCCB 52 1 47874 35077 D M1 MCCB 52 2 47874 35077 D M1 1 2 M1D1 7 MCCB 64 61111 45833 0 0 1 61111 45833 S WATER PUMP 1 3 M1D1 9 MCCB 74 88889 66667 0 0 1 888889 66667 S SPRINKLER PUMP *** File List *** S1.SH1 M1.SH1 Figure 8.6 Main design file SH1.DES for a shophouse M1 4 M3D1 0 MCCB 52 RCCB 2 2 4 MCCB 30 M1D1 6 1 29921 21923 T D T1 4 MCCB 30 M1D1 6 1 29921 21923 T D T1 Figure 8.7 DB design file M1.SH1 T1 5 M3D1 0 MCCB 30 RCCB3 6 5 2 1 MCB1 40 M3D1 2 6 300 145 R S 6x13A SSO 1 MCB1 M1D1 0 0 0 Y S SPARE 1 MCB1 M1D1 0 0 0 B S SPARE 1 MCB1 40 M3D1 1 8 300 145 R S 8x13A SSO 1 MCB1 40 M3D1 2 8 300 145 Y S 8x13A SSO 1 MCB1 40 M3D1 2 6 300 145 B S 6x13A SSO 1 MCB1 8 M3D1 0 10 61 38 R S 10x40W FLU FTG 1 MCB1 8 M3D1 0 10 61 38 Y S 10x40W FLU FTG 1 MCB1 M1D1 0 0 0 B S SPARE 4 MCB3 72 M3D1 3 1 11111 8333 T S COMPRESSOR 4 MCB3106 M3D1 4 1 16667 12500 T S DOL MOTOR Figure 8.8 DB design file T1.SH1 8.4 AUTOMATIC DRAFTING Most of the electrical consultants use AutoCAD for the drafting of the single-line diagrams, and there is currently no convenient means to link the AutoCAD diagrams to various design calculations, technical assessment and costing. Another approach is to complete the design, assessment and
  • 192. 180 Chapter 8 costing as described in Section 8.2 first, and then by making use of the design files, the package generates automatically the single-line diagram of the completed design on a large plotter [Ref. 4]. Figure 8.9 Sample print out from the costing module In the second approach, a file transfer module is required to extract data from the design files and rearrange them in the order in which they can be plotted efficiently. The file transfer module reads the design files, e.g. SH1.DES, M1.SH1, T1.SH1, and creates a drawing file with a file extension DRW, e.g. SH1.DRW. The drafting module reads the drawing file and produces the required single-line diagram on an A1 or A0-sized plotter. Based on the number of main busbars, the number of floors of the building, number of outgoing circuits in each main busbar, etc., the drafting module calculates the space required and positions the X and Y co-ordinates of each outgoing feeder at the respective floor level. It plots the first
  • 193. Computer-aided Design and Simulation 181 incoming main busbar on the left-hand side of the paper and the subsequent incoming main busbar towards the right. It then plots each outgoing circuit according to the automatically calculated positions. If a feeder is connected to a DB, the program will test whether there is enough space for plotting the details of all outgoing feeders connected to this DB. If the space is adequate, the details will be plotted, otherwise it will append all the data of the outgoing circuits of the DB to a second- page drawing file with a file extension DR2, such as SH1.DR2. The DR2 file will be plotted on the second page. This algorithm will be repeated on another feeder until the first page of the single-line diagram is completed. The program then searches through the second-page drawing file, e.g. SH1.DR2, and displays all the names of the DBs which have not been plotted on the first page. The designer may select all or any combination of the DBs to be plotted on the second page. Based on the number and the sizes of the selected DBs, the program calculates the size and determines dynamically, the space for each DB and plots all the selected DBs on the second page [Ref. 4]. The required symbols and standard drawing elements are grouped into two categories, namely the discrete drawing elements and the integrated drawing elements. The discrete drawing elements are the simple electrical symbols such as MCCB, ACB, busbar, cable, CT, fuse, transformer, starter, etc. The integrated drawing elements are more elaborate symbols consisting of a combination of several discrete drawing elements. The typical integrated drawing elements are the type 1 incoming busbar, type 2 incoming busbar, emergency busbar with generator, main distribution board, etc. A sample plot of the integrated element of the type 1 incoming busbar is shown in Figure 8.10. 8.5 SIMULATION TESTS Although there are standard rules used to guide the design of an installation, it is always difficult for the designer to visualise how well the design has been done. One may have to wait until the installation has been completed and observed for a number of years before a fair decision can be made. A more comprehensive CAD package, such as MIPTEIN [Ref. 1], however, provides a series of simulation tests which model the normal loading, overloading and short-circuit conditions so that the designer can visualise the performance of the installation under various simulated
  • 194. 182 Chapter 8 conditions, and experience the consequences due to the design errors. There are altogether six simulation tests to be carried out for each circuit in the whole installation. Figure 8.10 A sample plot of an integrated element Breaker and Cable Load Test The Breaker load test checks whether the design current, IB, exceeds the protective device’s current rating, IN. The breaker loading is defined as (IB/In) x 100%. If this value is less than 100%, the breaker load test will indicate a pass, “BK (P)”. On the other hand, “BK (F)” will be displayed if the design current is greater than the protective device’s nominal current. The cable load test checks whether the current carrying capacity of the conductor, under a particular installation condition, is greater than the design current. This test gives an indication whether the conductor will be overloaded under normal loading condition. The Cable loading is defined as (IB/Iz) x 100%. If the cable loading is less than 100%, “L (P)” is displayed. While “L (F)” indicates that the design current is greater than the conductor current rating under the particular installation methods. The display of breaker and cable loading test is shown
  • 195. Computer-aided Design and Simulation 183 in Figure 8.11. Based on the current rating of the protective device (IN), it detects whether IN > IB and IZ > IB. Circuit loading (IB/IZ) in percentage of the rated capacity under the specified conditions is also calculated and circuit loading exceeding 100% is considered as fail and highlighted. Figure 8.11 shows a cable loading failure (108% in red) for circuit 4 and a breaker failure ( IN = 16 A < IB = 17.32 A) in circuit 5. At the incoming circuit, the summation of the maximum demand of all the outgoing circuits is calculated as 21.85 kW and 13.99 kVAr. Based on a demand factor of 0.8, the maximum demand at the incoming circuit is 18.42 kW. Based on the calculated power factor of 0.8421, the design current is calculated as 31.57 A. As the incoming MCB is rated at 63 A, it is thus shown as ‘’ Incoming Breaker Test (P)” for the incoming circuit at the bottom on Figure 8.11. Figure 8.11 Cable utilisation test Overload Protection Test For overload protection test, the load current in each circuit is increased to 145% of the cable rated capacity and the operating time of the breaker protecting the circuit is modelled. If the operating time is less than two hours, it is considered to have passed the test. If it does not trip (i.e. it has a tripping time exceeding 2 hours), it is considered to have failed the overload protection test, and the circuit will be highlighted. For the
  • 196. 184 Chapter 8 overload protection test as shown in Figure 8.12, the second circuit fails since the breaker protecting this circuit will not trip within 2 hours when the cable is overloaded to 145%. Circuits 1, 5 and 6 have adequate protection against overloading within 56.65%, 38.96% and 11.51% respectively shown in Figure 8.12. For a special case, a circuit connected directly to a motor may fail the overload protection test such as circuits 3 and 4. However, it is still considered acceptable and shown as ‘(OK!)’ in Figure 8.12 as long as each motor is equipped with a built-in overload protection in the starter. Figure 8.12 Overload protection test Voltage Drop Test Based on the load current, method of installation, type and size of the cable in each circuit, the voltage drop in every circuit is modelled. The calculated voltage drop is displayed in volts and in percentage of the rated voltage. These values are then compared with the specified voltage drop tolerance at each section of the installation. Those circuits, which exceed the specified tolerance, are considered to have failed the test and will be highlighted. Short-Circuit Protection Test In the short-circuit protection test, the package compares the breaking capacity of each breaker in each circuit to the prospective short-circuit current at the point of installation. A breaker is considered to have failed
  • 197. Computer-aided Design and Simulation 185 if its breaking capacity is less than the short-circuit current. The package then models the operating time of each breaker based on the short-circuit current at the point of installation. A breaker is considered to have failed if the breaker’s operating time exceeds the critical operating time. The critical operating time is the maximum allowable time in seconds required to disconnect the circuit to ensure that the temperature in the conductor will not exceed its thermal limit during the fault condition. This critical value is calculated for each circuit based on the fault current, insulation material and the type and cross-sectional area of the conductors. A typical display of the short-circuit protection test is shown in Figure 8.13. Circuit 2 fails since the maximum withstand time of this cable is 3.186 seconds but the breaker operating time is 6.5 seconds resulting a failure of -104% as shown in Figure 8.13. Similarly for circuit 5, it fails with -526%. All other circuits pass from 74.88% for circuit 1 to 99.73% for circuit 6. Figure 8.13 Short-circuit protection test Motor Starting Test For each motor circuit, the package calculates the starting current based on the connected load and the type of starter. The starting current is assumed as four times the full load current for 15 seconds for a star-delta starter, and seven times the full load current for 10 seconds for a direct- on-line (DOL) starter. Based on the assumed starting currents, the operating time of each breaker is modelled. If this operating time exceeds the starting duration, it is considered to have passed the test. Figure 8.14
  • 198. 186 Chapter 8 shows circuits 3 and 4 fail and circuits 1 and 5 pass. For circuit 3, the starting current is 421 A and the 80-A MCCB operating time is 1 second which is shorter the stating duration of 10 second for DOL starter. Similarly, for circuit 4, the 100-A MCCB operating time is 11 seconds which is shorter than the duration of 15 seconds for AT80% starter. Figure 8.14 Motor starting test 8.6 INTEGRATED TOOLS FOR TEACHING An innovative approach of using computer-aided design tools to support the teaching of electrical installations through hands-on design exercises has been used at Nanyang Technological University and Singapore Polytechnic [Ref. 1, Ref. 6]. It is implemented by an integrated package with all the built-in facilities, which guide the students step-by-step to complete the design of two electrical installations, namely, a 300-kVA two-storey building and a 2-MVA seven-storey flatted factory. The dedicated file structure enables the students to get a direct access to the building information, details of each type of load and the technical parameters of all the electrical parts required for the design exercise. Errors made by the student are prompted on the spot and the student’s performance is evaluated automatically through error logs and a demerit point system. The series of simulation tests described in section 8.5 enable the students to visualise the performance of the installations designed by them under a series of loading conditions, and to foresee consequences which may be resulted due to the design errors.
  • 199. Computer-aided Design and Simulation 187 8.6.1 Automated Marking and Grading The errors made by the student in the design exercise are stored under 36 separate items classified under 9 types of errors. For example, errors such as wrong types of cables, wrong installation methods, undersized cables, oversized cables are classified as type 3 errors (cable specification), and each error carries 2 demerit points. A second attempt with hint given is classified as a type 9 error (2nd attempt) and each error carries 1 demerit point. Errors such as motor tripping during starting or wrong types of motor starters are classified as type 5 error (motor circuit specification) which carries 3 demerit points for each error made. There is, however, a special type 10 variable, which is used to store the bonus points. For example, if the three phases of a final DB can be balanced at 95% or above, one bonus point is given. An error checking data file, Points.dat, which has 36 error records is shown in Figure 8.15. Each record contains the record number, demerit points, error type and the specific error message. The evaluation of the student’s performance is based on 9 types of errors which can be quantified as demerit points. The conversion from the total demerit points to an appropriate grade is specified in the same error checking data file, Points.dat, from record 38 to record 42. The instructor can adjust and fine-tune the parameters in these few records to match the level of learning of the students. The overall score summary and the 9 types of errors are also shown in Figure 8.16. 8.6.2 Full Test and Partial Test To accelerate the design and learning process, three categories of designs, namely full design, partial design and automatic design can be accommodated in VipTein [Ref 1, Ref 6]. The instructor can specify in the building data file, in advance, the type of design for each circuit. For a full design, the student has to complete all the design procedures including the calculation of the design current, selection of breaker type, breaker rating, cable rating, calculation of voltage drop and sizing of protective conductor. If it is a partial design, the design current and the voltage drop will be calculated by the package and displayed in the side windows to help the student in selecting the size of the conductor. For circuit under automatic design, all the design works will be done by the package and displayed. The last category of the design is aimed at eliminating the routine or repetitive design works which cannot be avoided in the process of completing the design of the whole installation.
  • 200. 188 Chapter 8 0 -2 1 wrong circuit breaker type 1 -2 1 underestimated category of duty for circuit breaker 2 -2 1 overestimated category of duty for circuit breaker 3 -2 1 circuit breaker rating under rated 4 -2 1 circuit breaker rating over rated 5 -2 2 wrong design current,Ib, calculation 6 -3 5 wrong starter type 7 -2 3 wrong cable type 8 -2 3 wrong installation method 9 -2 3 undersized cable 10 -2 3 oversized cable 11 -2 2 wrong voltdrop calculation 12 -2 3 voltdrop exceeded specified % 13 -2 2 wrong Izmin calculation 14 -2 6 wrong correction factors 15 -2 6 underestimation of ways for DB 16 -2 6 overestimation of ways for DB 17 -2 6 DF/CF not acceptable 18 -2 6 wrong number of load connected to riser 19 -2 1 under rated RCCB 20 -2 1 over rated RCCB 21 -2 8 unconnected load 22 -2 8 unbalanced load - 15% 23 -3 5 motor trip during starting 24 -1 9 second attempt/hints given 25 -2 4 undersized busbar riser 26 -2 4 oversized busbar riser 27 -2 4 undersized busbar 28 -2 4 oversized busbar 29 -2 7 wrong postion of meters,devices and class of CT,etc 30 -2 7 under rating of generator 31 -2 7 over rating of generator 32 -2 7 wrong cpc selection 33 -2 7 incorrect type of incoming 34 1 10 practical connection of loads to riser 35 1 10 percentage balanced < 5% 36 1 10 reserve 37 0 0 END 38 -1 0 A 39 -4 0 B 40 -12 0 C 41 -19 0 D 42 -28 0 E 43 14 0 FINAL Figure 8.15 Error checking data file Point.dat 8.6.3 Implementation of VipTein The specially developed package known as VipTein, is abbreviated from ‘Visually Interactive Package for Teaching of Electrical Installation Network’. It is implemented in a project course to teach EEE second-year students in the design of electrical installation [Ref. 5, Ref 6]. The students are divided into 24 groups of 30 students each using 15
  • 201. Computer-aided Design and Simulation 189 microcomputers at a time. Although numerous modifications and three versions of updates have been made, the simulator has been run quite successfully for three years. Almost all students find it interesting and challenging. Figure 8.16 Summary of an assessment report F10 - NEXT STAGE Overall Score Type of Error Number of Error Demerit Point F1 - HARDCOPY Breaker Spec. Calculation Cable Spec. Busway/Cable Spec. Motor Circuit Spec. Assumptions Incoming Spec. Unconnected load 2nd Attempt 1 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 -2 -4 -4 0 0 0 -3 0 -2 Number of Bonus : 1 Bonus points : 1 Total demerit points : -14 Overall grade : C STUDENT NAME : Chang San CLASS/GROUP : S12/B : Lee Si Date : 19 Oct 1996 SUPERVISOR : A/Prof Teo Cheng Yu Time : 10:23:12 8.7 REFERENCES [1] Teo C Y, “A New Integrated Tool for Design Exercise of Electrical Installations Using a Microcomputer”, Journal of Electric Power Systems Research, vol.36, no. 2, PP 81-91, 1996. [2] “Regulations of Electrical Installation”, 16th Edition, IEE, 1991. [3] Teo C Y, “Computer-aided Design and Simulation of Low Voltage Electrical Distribution Systems”, Journal of Computers in Industry, vol. 34, no. 1, PP 87-94,1997. [4] Teo C Y, “Computer-aided Design, Assessment and Costing System for Electrical Installation in Building”, NTI Applied Research Report RP18/83, 1987. [5] Gooi H B, Teo C Y, “A Project-oriented Power Engineering Curriculum”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 10, no.1, 1995. [6] Teo Cheng Yu, ”Teaching of Power Engineering Through E-Learning with Laboratory Automated Assessment”, ICEE 2009, International Conference on Engineering and Education, 2009
  • 202. 190 APPENDIX A COMMON TECHNICAL TERMS Arcing Contact A contact on which the arc is intended to be established. Break Time The interval of time between the beginning of the operating time of a mechanical switching device and the end of the arcing time. This is also known as total operating time. Breaking Capacity A value of prospective breaking current that a switching device is capable of breaking at a stated voltage under prescribed conditions of use and behaviour. Breaking Current The current in a pole of a switching device at the instant of initiation of the arc during a breaking process. Circuit Breaker A mechanical switching device, capable of making, carrying and breaking currents under normal circuit conditions. It is also capable of making and carrying currents for a specified time, and breaking currents under specified abnormal circuit conditions such as those of short-circuit. Conventional Non-tripping Current A specified value of current which the relay or release can carry for a specified time (conventional time) without operating. Conventional Tripping Current A specified value of current which causes the relay or release to operate within a specified time (conventional time). This time is normally specified as 1 hour, 2 hours or 4 hours. Definite Time-delay Over-current Relay or Release An over-current relay or release which operates with a definite time-delay which may be adjustable but is independent of the value of the over- current.
  • 203. Common Technical Terms 191 Exposed-Conductive-Part A conductive part which an be readily touched and which normally is not live, but which may become live under fault conditions. Impulse withstand Voltage The highest peak value of an impulse voltage of prescribed form and polarity which does not cause breakdown under specified conditions of test. Instantaneous Relay or Release A relay or release which operates without any intentional time-delay. Inverse Time-delay Over-current Relay or Release An over-current relay or release which operates after a time-delay inversely dependent upon the value of the over-current. Making Capacity A value of prospective making current that a switching device is capable of making at a stated voltage under prescribed conditions of use and behaviour. For a.c., the rated making capacity is expressed by the r.m.s. value of the symmetrical component of the current, assumed to be constant. Main Contact A contact included in the main circuit of a mechanical switching device, intended to carry, in the closed position, the current of the main circuit. Opening Time The interval of time between the specified instant of initiation of the opening operation and the instant when the arcing contacts have separated in all poles. This is equivalent to pre-arcing time of a fuse. Over-current Relay or Release A relay or release which causes a mechanical switching device to open with or without time-delay when the current in the relay or release exceeds a pre-determined value. Power-frequency withstand Voltage The r.m.s. value of the sinusoidal voltage at power frequency which the insulation of the circuit-breaker withstands and does not cause breakdown under specified conditions.
  • 204. 192 Appendix A Prospective Current The current that would flow in the circuit, if each pole of the switching device or the fuse were replaced by a conductor of negligible impedance. Relay A device designed to produce sudden, pre-determined changes in one or more electrical output circuits when certain conditions are fulfilled in the electrical input circuits controlling the device. Release A device, mechanically connected to a mechanical switching device, which releases the holding means and permits the opening or the closing of the switching device. Residual Current Vector sum of the instantaneous values of the current flowing in the main circuit of the RCCB (expressed as r.m.s. value). Short-circuit (making and breaking) Capacity The alternating component of the prospective current, expressed by its r.m.s. value which the circuit-breaker is designed to make, carry for its opening time and to break under specified conditions. Short-time withstand Current The current that a circuit breaker can carry in the closed position during a specified short time under prescribed conditions of use and behaviour. Shunt Release A release energised by a source of voltage. Trip-free Mechanical Switching Device A mechanical switching device, the moving contacts of which return to and remain in the open position when the opening (i.e. tripping) operation is initiated after the initiation of the closing operation, even if the closing command is maintained.
  • 205. APPENDIX B FORMULAE FOR DESIGN CALCULATIONS B.1 Design current (A) for a 3-phase load I = kW 3 x 400 x p.f. x 1000 or I = kW kVAr 3 x 400 x 1000b b 2 2 + p.f. = cos tan kVAr kW -1⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟ B.2 Design current (A) for a 1-phase load I W 230 p.f. b = × B.3 Design current (A) for a motor I = kW 3 x 400 x p.f. x E x 10b ff 3 B.4 Design current (A) for discharge lighting I Wattage of Lamp 1.8 230b = × B.5 Minimum CPC size (mm2 ) S = I t kmin EF 2 × subject to Smin > 2.5 mm2 B.6 Minimum It value (A) Overload protection required : I = I C x C x Ct, min N g a i Overload protection not required : I = I C x C x Ct, min B g a i 193
  • 206. 194 Appendix B B.7 Stand-by generator capacity (kVA) Recommended generator capacity = 1.2 x design load B.8 Motor starting If manufacturer’s data is not available, the following starting conditions are recommended: DOL starter : Istarting = 7 x IFL for 10 s Other starter: Istarting = 4 x IFL for 15 s B.9 Demand and the coincidence factors Emergency load : DF = 1 CF = 1 Other Load : DF = 0.8 to 0.95 CF = 0.75 to 0.95 B.10 Voltage drop (V) V r cos + x sin 1000 I x lengthdrop B= × ( )θ θ B.11 Three-phase short-circuit current (A per phase) ( ) ( ) I V R R X X F L L S S ,3 1 2 1 2 3 φ = + + + − B.12 Line-to-neutral short-circuit current (A) ( ) ( ) I V R R R X X X F LN L L S n S , = + + + + + − 3 1 2 1 2 n B.13 Socket outlet circuit MCB current rating : use a minimum of 16 A to a maximum of 32 A Cable size : use a minimum of 2.5 mm2 to a maximum of 4 mm2 B.14 Line-to-Earth Short-circuit Current (A) I V ZF LE L L EFL , = − 3
  • 207. APPENDIX C TOUCH VOLTAGE AND FAULT CURRENT DISTRIBUTION C.1 Three-Phase Representation of a TN-S System In the sample TN-S system as shown in Figure C.1, the utility 22 kV network connected to DU is represented by an equivalent generator with Z1=Z2=Z0. Based on a fault level of 800 MVA with a X/R ratio of 10, the value of Z1 is 0.01244+j0.1244 p.u. on a 100 MVA, 22 kV base. The 6.5 Ω earthing resistor at the 22 kV incoming source is modeled as a resistor connected from the neutral of the equivalent generator to earth. 60 kW at 0.8 p.f. M 50 m 1X50mm2 Cu/pvc 3X25mm2 Cu/pvc 1X10mm2 Cu/pvc 50 m 3X95mm2 Cu/pvc 20 m 400 V22kV D2 D3D1DU Figure C.1 A sample TN-S system 6.5Ω 1.6 MVA 20 m The 1.6 MVA delta-earthed-wye transformer has a leakage reactance of 6% on a 1.6 MVA base i.e. 3.75 p.u. on a 100 MVA base. The 50-m circuit from D1 to D2 consists of three single-core, pvc-insulated copper conductor cables of 95 mm2 with a PC of 50 mm2 . The 20-m circuit from D2 to D3 is fed by similar cables of 25 mm2 with a PC of 10 mm2 . Based on the layout of circuit conductors as shown in Figure C.2, the self reactance of each single-core cable and their mutual reactances are calculated. The 60-kW motor is modeled as an un-earthed generator with a sub-transient reactance of 25% on 75 KVA base with X1=X2=X0. The value of X1 is 333.33 p.u. on a 100 MVA, 400 V base. The post-fault voltages including touch voltages and the current distribution for an earth fault from phase A to the frame of the motor is shown in Figure C.3. 195
  • 208. 196 Appendix C 21.2mm21.2mm21.2mm 7.98mm 11mm 5.1 mm5.1 mm Figure C.2 The layout of circuit conductors from D1 to D2 A B C N* PC * In a 3-phase 3-wire system, the neutral conductor is removed, but the space is kept D3 To illustrate the existence of non-zero touch voltages, it is assumed that the earth fault current has blown the fuse at phase A of the circuit from D2 to D3. This phenomena can be modeled by inserting a node 18 as shown in Figure C.4 in which the calculated post-fault voltages and current distribution are also shown. C.2 Three-Phase Representation of a TT System In the TT system as shown in Figure C.5, the utility 22 kV network connected to EU and the 22 kV/400 V transformer are represented by one equivalent generator connected to E1 with Z1 = Z2 = Z0 as shown in Figure C.6. Based on a fault level of 25 MVA with a X/R ratio of 5 at E1 Figure C.3 The post fault voltages and current distribution for the TN-S 24.1∠-480 155∠-380 29∠1690 95∠-1070 43∠-1190 54∠-970 241∠-1500 231∠-1500 24.1∠-480 233∠900 54∠-970 54∠-970 54∠-970 54∠-970 43∠-119043∠-1190 43∠-1190 43∠-1190 43∠-1190 2335∠-490 2335∠-490 2335∠-490 2335∠-490 12.7 K∠1200 12.7 K∠-1200 0.22∠1330 24.4∠-48° 24 ∠-480 0.22∠1330 .4 4 2 12.7 K∠0° 1 17 13 14 15 231∠900 7 227∠-330 5 6 196∠-370 2335∠-490 232∠900 11 D2D1 DU 9 239∠-1500 100.45∠-1190 0.57∠-970 24.5∠-490 2388∠-510 2388∠-510 2388∠-510 0∠00 56∠-250 155∠-380 2388∠-510 2388∠-510 168 12 3 0∠00 ∠00 0
  • 209. Touch Voltage and Fault Current Distribution 197 D3D2D1 the value of Z1 is 0.7845+j3.9225 p.u. on a 100 MVA, 400V base. The 50-m circuit from E1 to E2 consisting of four identical single-core, pvc-insulated copper conductor cables of 95 mm2 without PC, and the other 50-m circuit from E2 to E3 has an additional PC of 25 mm2 . The layout of the circuit conductors is the same as those shown in Figure C.2. It is assumed that the unbalanced load can be lumped at E3 as LA=200 A, LB=250 A and LC= 300 A with a power factor of 0.8. It is also assumed that the earth electrode resistance at the installation is 0.9 Ω and that at the equivalent generator at E1 is 0.1 Ω. The prefault voltages and current distribution is shown in Figure C.6. 4X95mm2 Cu/pvc 1X25mm2 Cu/pvc 50 m 50 m 4X95mm2 Cu/pvc 50 m 400 V400 V400 V22kV E2 E3E1 0.9 Ω 0.1Ω LA=200A LB=250AB LC=300A EU Figure C.5 A sample TT System Figure C.4 Fault current distribution after the operation of one fuse at node 18 1.5∠-1150 18∠-1020 18∠-1030 78∠1520 139∠-1150 140∠-1150 230∠-1510 1.5∠-1150 236∠900 140∠-1150 140∠-1150 140∠-1150 140∠-1150 139∠-1150 139∠-1150 139∠-1150 0∠00 0∠0 12.7 K∠1200 12.7 K∠-1200 0∠00 1.5∠-1150 1.5∠-1150 0∠00 0∠00 230∠-300 DU 231∠-300 4 2 3 12.7 K∠00 1 17 13 14 15 231∠900 7 233∠900 11 1.5∠-1150 1.5∠-1150 0∠00 279∠-1150 279∠-1150 279∠-1150 6.4∠-920 18∠-1030 279∠-1150 16 0∠00 279∠-1150 8 12 231∠-1500 139∠-1150139∠-1150 0∠00 0∠00 5 9 231∠-1510 106 18 0∠00
  • 210. 198 Appendix C 79.5∠1150 288∠830 195∠-370 243∠-1570 4 195∠-370 195∠-370195∠-370 227∠-0.030 5 225∠0.20 9 E2 E3E1 Y B R 243∠-1570 2 230∠-0.20 1 230∠1200 3 243∠-1570243∠-1570 227∠-1200 6 288∠830 243∠-1570 195∠-370224∠-1200 10 LC LB LA 79.5∠1150 288∠830288∠830 288∠830 223∠1200 11 226∠1200 7 79.5∠1150 79.5∠1150 12 1.4∠1000 0.7∠1000 8 0∠00 0∠00 0∠00 13 0.23∠-60 0∠00 14 0∠00 0.9Ω Figure C.6 . The pre-fault voltages and current disribution for the TT t 230∠-1200 0∠00 0∠00 For an earth fault from phase A to the exposed conductive part at E3 as shown in Figure C.7, the earth fault current is actually less than the load currents in the other two healthy phases. The shock voltages are also higher than those in the TN-S system. The fault current distribution and the post-fault voltages including shock voltages and neutral voltages are also shown in Figure C.7. C.3 Single Phase Representation Without using computer programs, the calculation of earth-fault currents can be approximated by using a single phase equivalent. The values of cable impedance can also be approximated by using the voltage drop constant given in the IEE cable tables.
  • 211. Touch Voltage and Fault Current Distribution 199 80∠1220 287∠830 386∠-190 245∠-1560 4 386∠-190 386∠-190 386∠-190 203∠-20 5 198∠-20 9 E2 E3E1 Y B R 245∠1560 2 208∠-0.30 1 242∠1240 3 245∠-1560245∠-1560 242∠-1240 6 287∠830 245∠-1560 190∠-380239∠-1240 10 LC LB LA 80∠1220 287∠830 287∠830 287∠830 232∠1250 11 235∠1250 7 80∠1220 80∠1220 12 22∠-1760 22∠-1730 8 215∠-30 215∠-30 215∠-30 0.9Ω 215∠-30 13 198∠-20 193∠-30 14 240∠-1250 215∠-30 21∠1770 Figure C.7 The post fault voltages and current distribution for the TT system For the same sample TN-S system as shown in Figure 1, the combined impedance of the utility and the transformer can be transferred from 22 kV to 400 V. This impedance is : ZS = ZG+ZTF =0.0016Ωx(0.01244+j0.1244)+0.0016Ωx(j3.75) = 0.00002+j0.0002+j0.006 (Ω ) = 0.00002+j0.0062 (Ω) From IEE cable Table 4D1B, column 8 Z95=(0.00041+j0.00023)x50/ 3=0.01184+j0.00664 (Ω) Z25=(0.0015+j0.00025)x20/ 3=0.01732+j0.00289 (Ω) Z10=(0.0038+j0.0)x20/ 3=0.04388 (Ω)
  • 212. 200 Appendix C Z50 = (0.00080 + j0.00024) x 50/ 3 = 0.02309+j0.00693 (Ω) By using IEE cable table, the earth fault current is I 400 / 3 Z Z Z Z Z F,LE,T S 95 25 10 5 = + + + + 0 = 230.9 0.09615 j0.02266+ = 2337∠-13° (A) Alternatively the cable impedance can be obtained by calculating the self and mutual reactances based on the layout of circuit conductors as shown in Figure C.2. Based on the self reactance only, the impedance of each conductor is: ZC=RC+jXC = ρ π L A j2 fk(ln 2L Ds -1) x L+ where ρ=2.25x10-8 Ω.m at 70°C , K=2x10-7 H/m, DS= 0.7788 multiplied by the radius of the cylindrical conductor, and f=50 Hz. ZC95= 225 10 50 95 10 06283 10 2 50 07788 55 10 1 508 6 4 3 . . (ln . . )x x x j x x x x x x− − − − + − = 0.01184+j0.02845 (Ω) ZC25=0.01732+j0.01106 (Ω) ZC10=0.04388+j0.01164 (Ω) ZC50=0.02309+j0.02944 (Ω) The mutual reactance between phase A conductor and the PC is : ZM = j fk L Dm xL2 2 1π (ln )−
  • 213. Touch Voltage and Fault Current Distribution 201 where the value of Dm is the distance between the centres of the phase A conductor and the PC. ZM50,95 = ZM95,50= j x x x x x06283 10 2 50 833 10 1 504 3 . (ln . )− − − = j0.01912 (Ω) ZM25,10= ZM10,25 = j0.00693 (Ω) By using the self and mutual reactances, the fault current is I 400 / 3 Z Z Z Z + Z - 2Z 2ZF,LE,M S S95 S25 S10 S50 M95,50 - M25,10 = + + + = + 2309 0 09615 0 03470 . . .j = 2259∠-20° (A) The earth fault current calculated by using the 3-phase representation as shown in Figure C.3 is 2388 ∠-51°.
  • 214. APPENDIX D PER UNIT CALCULATION D.1 Calculation of Per Unit Impedance Case 1: For base MVA = 100 MVA and base voltage = 400 V, Per Unit Impedance = ( )base voltage base MVA 2 = 400 x 400 100 x 106 = 0.0016 Ω Case 2: For base MVA = 1 MVA and base Voltage = 400 V, Per Unit Impedance = 400 x 400 1 x 106 = 0.16 Ω Case 3: For base MVA = 100 MVA and base Voltage = 22 kV, Per Unit Impedance = ( )22 x 22 x 10 100 x 10 6 6 = 4.84 Ω D.2 Conversion from Fault Level to Per Unit Impedance Example D.2.1 Calculate the equivalent impedance for a fault level of 25 MVA at 400 V with a X/R ratio of 5. Solution Select base MVA = 1 MVA and base voltage = 400 V. The equivalent per unit impedance (ΖS, p.u. ) of the 25 MVA fault level is : 202
  • 215. Per unit calculation 203 ΖS, p.u. = 1 25 = 0.04p.u. since Ζ = R X2 + 2 and X/R = 5 , 0.04 = R Rs 2 s 2 + 25 = R 26s RS,pu = 0.04 26 = 0.0078 p.u. RS = 0.16Ω x 0.0078 = 0.001248 Ω at 400 V XS,pu = 0.0078 x 5 = 0.039 p.u. XS = 0.16 Ω x 0.039 = 0.00624 Ω at 400 V Example D.2.2 Calculate the equivalent impedance of a fault level of 800 MVA at 22 kV with a X/R of 10. Solution Select base MVA = 100 MVA and base voltage = 22 kV. As the per unit voltage is 1.0 and the fault current resulted from the fault level of 800 MVA is 800 MVA / 100 MVA = 8 per unit current, the equivalent per unit impedance of the 800 MVA fault level is ZS, p.u. = 1 8 = 0.125 p.u. since Z = R X2 2 + and X/R = 10 , 0.125 = R + 100Rs 2 s 2 = R 101s RS,pu = 0.125 101 = 0.0124 p.u.
  • 216. 204 Appendix D RS = 4.84 Ω x 0.0124 = 0.06 Ω at 22 kV XS,pu = 10 x 0.0124 = 0.124 p.u. XS = 4.84 Ω x 0.124 = 0.6 Ω at 22 kV Example D.2.3 Calculate the equivalent impedance of the fault level of 35 kA at 400 V with a X/R ratio of 5. Solution Since the three-phase short-circuit current IF is IF = (400 / 3 ) / ZS The equivalent per phase impedance ZS resulted by the 35 kA fault current is: ZS = (400 / 3 ) / (35,000) = 0.006598 Ω RS = 0.006598 / 26 = 0.001294 Ω XS = 5 RS =0.00647 Ω If the base MVA is 1 MVA and the base voltage is 400 V, the per unit values are : RS,pu = 0.001294 Ω / 0.16 Ω = 0.00808 per unit XS, pu = 0.00647 Ω / 0.16 Ω = 0.04044 per unit
  • 217. APPENDIX E TUTORIAL FOR IEE SHORT COURSE E1 Determine the type of protective device, current rating and the required breaking capacity for a circuit to a 3-phase motor that is rated at 25 kW, 95% efficiency and 0.85 power factor. This motor has a DOL starter. The main switchboard is fed by a 1-MVA, 22-kV/LV transformer that has a leakage impedance of 6% as shown in Figure E.1. The fault level at 22 kV is 800 MVA and the ambient temperature is 40°C. If the motor circuit is a 4 x 25 mm2, single-core copper conductor pvc-insulated cable installed in trunking at a length of 15 m, determine whether this circuit is adequately protected against both overload and short-circuit currents when a fault occurs at the motor terminal. 22 kV LV Main switchboard 800 MVA 1 MVA 6 % 95% Eff. 0.85 p.f. 25 kW ? DOL M 4 x 25 mm2 Cu/PVC, 15 m IF1 IF2 Figure E.1 E2 The design current of DB1 is 39 A and it is fed by a 4 x 10 mm2 single- core, copper conductor, pvc-insulated cables and protected by a 40 A MCCB as shown in Figure 4.2. (a) Does this circuit satisfy the requirements for overload protection? (b) State the range of small overload that this circuit is not protected. (c) If this circuit is upgraded to a 4 x 25 mm2 cable, can this circuit be loaded up to 100% of its rated capacity? 205
  • 218. 206 Appendix E 40A MCCB 4 x 10 mm2 /1C/Cu/PVC/NA, trunking IB = 39A DB1 Figure E.2 E3 The low-voltage supply to a high-rise block is shown in Figure E.3. A short circuit occurs inside a final distribution board at the top floor. The fault current is 500 A. Figure E.3 63A 500A MCCB 200A Main Switchboard BS 88 fuse 200A OG Box A final DB at top floor (a) What is the operating time of the incoming protective device at the final DB if it is a BS EN 60898, 63-A type C MCB, or an IEC 1008, 63- A RCCB with a rated residual operating current of 0.1 A? (b) Determine the operating time of the MCCB rated at 200 A at the main switchboard.
  • 219. Tutorial for IEE Short Course 207 (c) Determine the operating time of the BS 88 fuse rated at 200 A at the OG Box. E4 As shown in Figure E.4, the 4 x 10 mm2 copper conductor, pvc-insulated cable which has a ‘k’ value of 115 is protected by a BS EN 60898 100-A type C MCB. (a) Determine the ranges of short-circuit current in which this circuit is not protected. Suggest an appropriate correction so that the unprotected range can be reduced or totally eliminated. (b) The breaking capacity of the 100-A MCB is 10 kA but the expected fault current is 14 kA. Determine the current rating of a BS 88 fuse that can be used to back-up the MCB. Will the operating time of the fuse be greater than the operating time of the MCB? Type C 100 A MCB 4 x 10 mm2 Cu/PVC IF=14 kA Figure E.4 E5 A 4 x 10 mm2 circuit, clipped directly on a non-metallic surface as shown in Figure E.5 is protected by a 60-A MCCB which has a maximum operating time of 0.1 s. The short-circuit current is 5000 A. (a) Explain why this circuit is not adequately protected against short circuit and recommend the necessary remedial solution. (b) Determine the maximum short-circuit current that this circuit can withstand. 60A MCCB 4 x 10 mm2 /1C/Cu/PVC/NA, clipped direct IF = 5000A Figure E.5
  • 220. 208 Appendix E E6 For protection against indirect contact for electric shock in an installation which is part of a TN system, determine the maximum earth fault loop impedance for a final circuit supply only stationary equipment if it is solely protected by: (a) A BS EN 60898, 63-A type C MCB, (b) A BS EN 60898, 63-A type B MCB, or (c) An IEC 1008, 63-A RCCB with a rated residual operating current of 0.03 A. E7 An installation that is part of a TT system has a final circuit with a length of 20 m for socket outlets. The circuit is a single-core, pvc-insulated copper conductor cable of 4 mm2 with a separate CPC of the same size as shown in Figure E.6. The CPC from the final DB to the main earthing terminal is 16 mm2 at 30 m and the earthing conductor is 25 mm2 at 10 m. All the CPC are single-core pvc-insulated copper conductors and the earth electrode resistance is 0.3 Ω. Assume that the ambient temperature is 300 C and the average CPC temperature during fault condition is 950 C. Does this final circuit satisfy the protection requirement for electric shock if the protective device is? (a) BS 3871, 20-A type 1 MCB, (b) A BS EN 60898, 20-A type C MCB, or (c) An IEC 1008, 20-A RCCB with a rated residual operating current of 0.03 A. E8 A 230-V supply to an electric heater utilizes a circuit of pvc-insulated, copper conductor cable of 6 mm2, with a separate bare copper conductor CPC size of 4 mm2 at a length of 18 m as shown in Figure E.7. The external earth fault loop impedance has a resistance value of 0.12 Ω and a reactance value of 0.8 Ω. Determine whether the size of the 4 mm2 CPC can satisfy the electric shock protection as well as the thermal constraint if the circuit is protected by a BS EN 60898, 40-A type B MCB. If this circuit is protected by an IEC 1008, 40-A RCCB with a rated
  • 221. Tutorial for IEE Short Course 209 residual current of 0.03 A, determine the maximum allowable disconnection time based on the thermal limit of the 4 mm2 CPC. To Socket outlets 1x16mm2 Cu/PVC 1x25mm2 Cu/PVC, clipped direct trunking, 20m 1x4mm2 Cu/PVC2x4mm2 Cu/PVC, 63A clipped direct, 30m 10m CPC Earthing conductor Earth Electrode 0.3Ω Final DB Earthing Terminal RCCB 20 A Figure E.6 40A clipped direct, 18m Heater MCB RE = 0.12 Ω XE = 0.8 Ω 2x6mm2 1C/Cu/PVC, 1x4mm2 bare copper conductor(CPC) Figure E.7 E9 The electrical supply to a factory is fed by a 1.6-MVA, 22/0.4-kV transformer that has a reactance of 6 % as shown in Figure E.8. The resistance of the transformer is negligible. All the MCCBs have the same time-current characteristic as given in Table E.1. The current ratings and the values of resistance and reactance of each circuit are given in Table E.2. Determine the magnitude of the earth-fault current for an earth fault at the motor terminal and confirm whether the motor circuit has adequate protection against electric shock? Give reasons with calculation.
  • 222. 210 Appendix E ×× 400 V MCCB 22 kV 4 x 95 mm2 MCCB 4 x 25 mm2 1.6 MVA 200 A 6 % M 1 x 50 mm2 Final DB 0.9 Ω 1 x 10 mm2 25 kW 1 x 300 mm2 1 x 300 mm2 Figure E.8 100 A Table E.1 Time-current Characteristic of MCCBs Multiple of rated current Operating time (seconds) > 10 0.03 5 0.1 4 5 3.3 12 2 100 1.3 7200 Table E.2 Cable Characteristic Cable Size Current rating Resistance* Reactance* 4 x 95 mm2 207 A 0.007 Ω 0.004 Ω 4 x 25 mm2 89 A 0.008 Ω 0.002 Ω 1 x 50 mm2 - 0.014 6Ω 0.003 Ω 1 x 10 mm2 - 0.022 Ω 0.0 Ω 1 x 300 mm2 - 0.0 Ω 0.0 Ω * Per-phase value for the whole circuit length and no temperature correction is required.
  • 223. APPENDIX F SOLUTION TO TUTORIAL E F.1 Solution to E1 IB = (25 x 10 ) / (0.95 x 0.85 xB 3 3 x 400) = 44.69 A IS = 7 x 44.69 = 313 A Select a base of 1.0 MVA and 0.4 kV. The equivalent source impedance of a fault level of 800MVA is 0.00125 p. u. The three-phase short-circuit current at the main switchboard is: kA23.56=kA1.44316.33=I p.u.33.16 06125.0 1 00125.006.0 1 I F,3 3,F × == + = φ φ The type of protective device should be a MCCB with a breaking capacity of more than 23.56 kA. The current rating of the MCCB should be higher than the design current of 44.69 A and it must not operate within 10 s at a starting current of 313 A. From the time-current characteristic of MCCB at 400 C and for the operating time of 10 s, the corresponding current multiplier is 2.2. Thus, the current rating of the MCCB should be higher than 313/2.2 =142 A. A current rating of 200 A is selected. From Table 4D1A, the tabulated current rating (It) of the 25 mm2 circuit is 89 A. IZ = 89 x 0.87 = 77 A, I2 = 1.30 x 200 = 260 A, 1.45 IZ = 1.45 x 89 x 0.87 = 112 A Since IN is not < IZ, and I2 is not < 1.45 IZ, this circuit does not satisfy the requirement for overload protection. The per unit resistance and reactance of the 25 mm2 cable from Table 4D1B are: unitper0157.0 10000.163 150.29 =x unitper0812.0 100016.03 155.1 r = ×× × = ×× × = 211
  • 224. 212 Appendix F The three-phase short circuit current at the motor terminal is ( ) kA9.12unitper94.8 0812.00157.006.000125.0 1 I 22 3,F == +++ =φ The maximum duration for the 25mm2 cable to withstand a fault current of 12.9 kA is ( ) s0496.0 12900 25115 I Sk t 2 22 2 F 22 max,cable = × == Since the operating time of the MCCB at a current of 12.9 kA is 0.1 s which is greater than the critical time of 0.0496 s, this circuit is not adequately protected against short-circuit current. F.2 Solution to E2 (a) This circuit satisfies the requirements for overload protection based on IEE Regulation 433: (i) since IZ = 50 A and IN = 40 A, it satisfies IN < IZ (ii) since I2 =1.3 x 40 =52 A and 1.45IZ = 72.5 A, it satisfies I2 < 1.45 IZ (b) The unprotected range is from 50.1 A to 51.9 A. (c) The maximum circuit loading is: I2 / IZ = 52 / 89 = 58% F.3 Solution to E3 (a) The operating time for a BS EN 60898 63-A type C MCB is 6.5 s. (from Figure 2.9). If it is a line-to-neutral fault, the RCCB will not operate. If it is a line-to-earth fault, the operating time is 0.04 s since the residual current is 500/0.1 = 5000I∇N. (b) The operating time of the 200 A MCCB varies from 9 s to 150 s depending on the ambient temperature and the setting of the MCCB. (from Figure 2.13). (c) The operating time of the BS 88 fuse rated at 200 A is 300 s (from Figure 5.7). F.4 Solution to E.4 (a) If the maximum operating time of the MCB is 0.01 s and from the
  • 225. Solution to Tutorial E 213 adiabatic equation, tcable, max = k2S2/I2, the corresponding maximum current that the cable can withstand is: 0.01 I , or I 0.01 11.5 kA 2 = = = Thus, the cable will not be protected if the fault current is higher than 11.5 kA. If the fault current is in the range from 514 A to 1000 A, the operating time of the MCB is greater than tcable, max and thus, this circuit is also not protected. The unprotected range from 514 A to 1000 A can be eliminated by (i) replacing the 100 A type C MCB by type B or (ii) replacing the 100 A type C MCB by a 50 A type C MCB. The unprotected range from 11.5 kA onwards c 115 10 115 10 2 2 × × an be eliminated by using a backup BS 88 fuse than the MCB, the fuse should be operated first. F.5 Solution to E5 (Illustrated in Figure 5.13) (b) The current rating of a backup fuse is normally double the rating of the MCB (i.e. 200 A if the MCB is 100 A). However, it must be verified with the time current characteristic curves of the MCB and the fuse. For the fault current below the breaking capacity of the MCB, the MCB should operate irst, and for fault current at approximately equal or higherf breaking capacity of the (a) t I 5000 0.0529 scable, max 2 2 = = = Since the operating time of the MCCB at a current of 5,000 A is 0.1 s, which is greater than tcable, max, this circuit is not adequately protected against short-circui k S 115 10 2 2 2 2 × t current. The remedial action is to increase the conductor’s size to: 2max min mm75.13 115 1.05000 k tI × (b) The maximum short circuit that this circuit can withstand is: S === A3637 0.1 10115 t kS =I maxF, = × = F.6 Solution to E6 For final circuit connecting to stationary equipment, the disconnection time is 5 s.
  • 226. 214 Appendix F (a) The current causing the 63-A type C MCB to operate within 5 s is 630 A. Thus, Ω== 365.0 630 C,MCB,A63max,,EFL (b) The c 230 Z urrent causing the 63-A type B MCB to operate within 5 s is 315 A. Thus, Ω== 73.0 315 (c) If protection is 230 Z B,MCB,A63max,,EFL provided by a RCCB, the maximum earth fault loop impedance is: Ω== Δ = 1666 03.0 50 nI 50 Z 03.0,RCCBmax,,EFL F.7 Solution to E7 For a TT system, the condition that limits the touch voltage to not more than 50 V is: RLIA < 50 V, where IA is the current causing the automatic operation of the protection device within 5 s. From Table 4D1B of the IEE Regulation:Wiring ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) A4.105 0.4742 50 =I 0.47420.3+0.0095+0.0455+0.1192= R+R+R+R=R 0095.0 7023010002 95+230101.75 =R 0455.0 70+23010002 95+230302.8 =R 1192.0 7023010002 952302011 R A eCPC25,CPC16,CPC4,L CPC25, CPC16, CPC,4 = Ω= Ω= +× × Ω= × × Ω= +× +× = ithin 5 s and thus, it satisfies the requirement for earth fault e is 11 s, which l current s and obviously, it satisfies the requirement. (a) For a BS 3871 20-A type 1 MCB, the operating time for a current of 105.4 A is w protection. (b) For a BS EN 60898 20-A type C MCB, the operating tim exceeds 5 s, and thus, it does not satisfy the requirement. (c) For an IEC 1008 20-A RCCB, the operating time for a residua of 105.4 A is 0.04
  • 227. Solution to Tutorial E 215 Solution to E.8 Assume that the average phase conductor temperature during the fault is (70+160)/2 = 1150C and the CPC is (30 C + 200) / 2 = 115 C.0 0 From Table 4D1B of the IEE Wiring Regulations, the resistance values are: Ω=×⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ + 702302 4 ⎛ + ×= Ω=×⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ + + ×= 1139.0 1000 1811523011 R 0756.0 1000 18 70230 115230 2 3.7 R6 The earth fault loop impedance is: ( ) ( ) Ω=++ +++= 858.08.012.09 XRRRZ 22 2 E 2 E46EFL The line-to-earth fault current is: += 113.00756.0 A268 858.0 I LE,F == For a current of 268 A, the operating time of the 40-A type B MCB is 0.1 s which is less than the required time of 5 s and 230 thus, it satisfies the straint, the minimum cross-sectional area of the cpc for type B MCB is: requirement for protection against electric shock. To satisfy the thermal con 2 22 Btypemin, mm533.0 159 1.0268 k t × imum disconnection time based on the thermal limit of the 4 mm2 CPC is: I S === Thus, the CPC size of 4 mm2, which is greater than 0.533 mm2 , satisfies the thermal constraints. The max s63.5 268 4159 I sk t 2 22 2 LE,F 22 max = × == F.9 Solution to E9 Select a base of 1.6 MVA and 0.4 kV. The line-to-earth short-circuit current at the motor terminal is: 30050102595TF motorEF, Z+Z+Z+Z+Z+Z =I 230
  • 228. 216 Appendix F The transf ZTF,Ω = ZTF,p.u. X 0.1 Ω = 0.06 X 0.1 Ω = 0.006 Ω ormer impedance ZTF expressed in ohms is, A4323= 0.0532 = 0.051+0.015 = 22 As the motor is stationary equipment, the disconnection time for earth fault is 5 s. The operating time 230230 0.014)+0.022+0.008+(0.0070.003)+0.002+0.004+(0.006 230 =I 22 motorEF, + of the 100 A MCCB at the earth fault urrent of 4323 A is 0.03 s and thus, it satisfies the requirement for rotection against electric shock. c p
  • 229. 217 APPENDIX G MODEL EXAMINATION QUESTIONS WITH SOLUTION G1 The electrical supply to a factory is fed by a utility through an ACB rated at 1600 A as shown in Figure G.1. The fault level at the 400-V intake substation is 25 MVA (36 kA) with a X/R ratio of 5. The maximum demand at the MCC is 260 kW and the power factor is 0.8. All the installed circuits are pvc-insulated, copper conductor cables clipped direct in trefoil on the wall. The rated current and voltage drop data for each cable are given in Table G.1. Correction factors for temperature, grouping and thermal insulation are not required. The calculated earth fault current at the MCC is 400 A and that at the 40-kW motor terminal is 250 A. All the MCCBs have the same time- current characteristic as given in Table G.2. (a) State the conditions necessary for protection against overload current. Does the circuit from the intake substation to the MCC satisfy the requirements for overload protection? Support your answer by numerical calculation. Determine the range of small overload for which this circuit is not protected. (12 marks) (b) Verify by calculation whether the 500-A MCCB provides adequate protection for the circuit from the intake substation to the MCC when a 3- phase short-circuit occurs at the MCC. (8 marks) (c) Calculate the touch voltage at the 40 kW motor frame if the red- phase cable is shorted to the motor frame. The combined resistance of the earthing conductor and the earth electrode is 0.3 Ω and the earthing system is a TT system. (5 marks) Table G.1 Current Rating and Voltage Drop for 3-phase 4 cables Cable Size Rated Current Voltage Drop (mV per ampere per metre) (mm2) (A) R X 25 110 1.50 0.175 50 167 0.80 0.165 120 308 0.32 0.150 300 561 0.13 0.140
  • 230. 218 Appendix G M 40 kW MCC (400 V)Intake (400 V) MCCB 100 A MCCB 500 A 4 x 50 mm2, 20 m4 x 300 mm2, 40 m 1 x 25 mm2, 20 m, CPC 1 x 120 mm2, 40 m, CPC Earthing conductor Earth electrode ACB 1600 A × Figure G.1 Table G.2 Time-current Characteristic of MCCBs Multiple of Rated Current Operating Time (Seconds) > 10 0.03 5 0.10 3.3 12.0 2 100 1.3 3600 1.0 ∞ Solution to G1 (a) Required conditions for protection against overload: (i) IN ≤ IZ (ii) I2 ≤ 1.45 IZ For the circuit from intake substation to MCC, IN =500 A, IZ = 561 A, I2 = 1.3 x 500 A =650 A, 1.45 IZ = 1.45 x 561 A =814 A Thus, conditions (i) and (ii) are satisfied and this circuit is adequately protected against overload current accordingly to IEE Regulation 433. The range of small overload that this circuit is not protected is from 561.1 A to 649.9 A. (b) Select base MVA = 1 MVA and base voltage = 400 V. The equivalent per unit impedance of the 25 MVA fault level is:
  • 231. Model Examination Questions with Solution 219 ZS,pu = 1 / 25 = 0.04 p.u RS,pu = 0.04 / 26 = 0.0078 p.u. (from X/R = 5) RS = 0.16 Ω x 0.0078 = 0.001248 Ω at 400 V XS,pu = 0.0078 x 5 = 0.039 p.u. XS = 0.16 Ω x 0.039 = 0.00624 Ω at 400 V Z300mm = 40x (0.13 + j0.14) / ( 3 x 1000) = 0.003 + j 0.00323 Ω The 3-phase fault current at the MCC is IF,3-phase = VLN / (ZS + Z300mm ) =(400 / 3 )/ (0.004248 + j0.00947) = 22.250 kA ∠ -65.8 tcable,max = k2 S2 / IF 2 = (1152 x 3002 ) / 222502 = 2.4 s Since tMCCB is less than tcable max, this circuit provides adequate protection against short- circuit currents. (c) The tough voltage at the motor frame is: 250 A x ( Z25mm + Z120mm + 0.3) = 250 x ( 0.3247 + j 0.005484) = 81.19 V G2 The electrical supply to a high-rise apartment is fed by a 1 MVA, 22/0.4 kV transformer. The schematic diagram of part of the electrical installation is shown in Figure G.2. All the installed circuits are pvc-insulated copper conductor cables clipped direct in trefoil on the wall. Voltage-drop data for each cable is given in Table G.3. Temperature correction for cable resistive value is not required. (a) Calculate the short-circuit current for a line-earth fault developed at the socket outlet. (10 marks) (b) Calculate the touch voltage for an earth fault at the appliance connected to the socket outlet within the earthed equipotential zone. (5 marks) (c) State the two necessary conditions which will provide adequate protection against electric shock and determine whether the 60 A RCCB can be replaced by an MCCB. (10 marks)
  • 232. 220 Appendix G Table G.3 Three-phase voltage-drop data (mV per ampere per metre) Cable Size (mm2 ) R X Z 4 9.5 - - 16 2.4 - - 35 1.10 0.170 1.10 50 0.80 0.165 0.82 120 0.32 0.150 0.36 300 0.13 0.140 0.190 Figure G.2 Solution to G2 The transformer impedance ZTF is (0.0016 + j0.0078) Ω. The per phase resistance and reactance of all the cables in the earth fault loop are: Rcable = R120 +R35 + R4 +R4 + R16 +R50 = 0.1912Ω Xcable = X120 +X35 + X4 +X4 + X16 +X50 = 0.0028Ω The earth fault current at the socket outlet IEF,SSO is 15.3A1191 0106.0j1928.0 230 Z+Z+Z+Z+Z+Z+Z 230 =I 50164435120TF SSOEF, −∠= + = 1 x 4 mm2, CPC, 15 m MCB 30 A SPN RCCB 60 A DP MCCB 100 A DP MCCB 250 A TPN 2 x 4 mm2 15 m Socket Outlet 2 x 35 mm2 10 m 4 x 120 mm2 10 m 1 x 16 mm2 CPC, 10 m MCCB 400 A TPN 1 x 50 mm2, CPC, 10 m LV 1 x 300 mm2, 10 m 22 kV ZTF = 0.0016 + j 0.0078 Ω (referred to LV) 0.5 Ω
  • 233. Model Examination Questions with Solution 221 (b) For an earth fault current of 1196 A, the operating time of the 30 A MCB is 0.1 s for any current exceeding 300 A. Thus, the touch voltage is VT = ZCPC x IA = (Z4 + Z16 + Z50 ) x IA = (0.1007 + j0.001) x 300 = 30.2 V (c) Conditions for a TN system to have adequate protection against electric shock are: (i) the maximum disconnection time for hand-held equipment and for fixed equipment is 0.4 s and 5 s respectively. (ii) For hand-held equipment, the disconnection time can be increased to 5 s if the touch voltage is within 50 V. For protection by MCCB alone, the operating time of the breaker for an earth fault current of 1196 A is 0.1 s which meets condition (i). Similarly, the touch voltage is 30 V which is less than 50 V and such touch voltage can be disconnected within 0.1 s. Thus the 60 A RCCB can be replaced by an MCCB. G3 In the TN-S system as shown in Figure G.3, the three-phase fault level at D1 is 25 MVA with a X/R ratio of 5. The 50-m circuit from D1 to D2 consists of three single-core, pvc-insulated copper conductor cables of 95 mm2 with a CPC of 50 mm2. The 20-m circuit from D2 to the motor consists of similar cables of 25 mm2 with a CPC of 10 mm2. The motor is rated at 60 kW with 90 % efficiency and 0.8 power factor. The motor has a direct-on- line starter. The starting current is seven times the full-load current and lasts for 10 s. Voltage-drop constants for cables at 70 degree C are given in Table G.4. Temperature correction on the resistive value is not required. (a) Determine the current rating and the breaking capacity of the MCCB at D2 for the motor circuit at an ambient temperature of 40 degree C. (10 marks) (b) Determine the maximum allowable operating time for the MCCB at D2 if this MCCB is designed to provide adequate short-circuit protection for a three-phase fault at the motor terminal. The k constant of the 25-mm2 copper conductor cable is 143 at 30 degree C and 115 at 70 degree C. (5 marks) (c) For a short-circuit from the blue phase to the frame of the motor, calculate the earth fault current and the touch voltages at the motor and at the earthing terminal at D2. (10 marks)
  • 234. 222 Appendix G xx 22 kV ~ 50 m 6.5 Ω M 3 x 25 mm2 cu / pvc3 x 95 mm2 cu / pvc 60 kW x 20 m 20 m50 m 1 x 10 mm2 cu / pvc1 x 50 mm2 cu / pvc 0.8 Ω 400 V D1 400 V D2 Figure G.3 Table G.4 Voltage Drop Constants Conductor Voltage drop in mV per ampere per metre cross-sectional area (mm2) 2 cables Single-phase ac 3 or 4 cables Three-phase ac r x Z r x z 10 4.4 0 4.4 3.8 0 3.8 25 1.75 0.20 1.75 1.5 0.25 1.55 50 0.93 0.19 0.95 0.80 0.24 0.84 95 0.47 0.18 0.50 0.41 0.23 0.47 Solution to G3 (a) IB = ( 60 x 10 ) / (0.9 x 0.8 xB 3 3 x 400) = 120 A, IS = 7 x 120 = 840 A The current rating of the MCCB should be higher than 840/2.2 = 382 A. Select base MVA = 1 MVA and base voltage = 400 V. The equivalent per unit impedance of the 25 MVA fault level is : ZS,pu = 1 / 25 = 0.04 p.u RS,pu = 0.04 / 26 = 0.0078 p.u. (from X/R = 5) RS = 0.16 Ω x 0.0078 = 0.001248 Ω at 400 V
  • 235. Model Examination Questions with Solution 223 XS,pu = 0.0078 x 5 = 0.039 p.u. XS = 0.16 Ω x 0.039 = 0.00624 Ω at 400 V Z95mm = 50x (0.41 + j0.23) / ( 3 x 1000) = 0.0118 + j 0.006639 Ω The 3-phase fault current at D2 is IF,3-phase,D2 = VLN / (ZS + Z95mm ) = (400 / 3 )/ (0.0131 + j0.01263) = 12,691 A ∠ - 44 The breaking capacity of the MCCB should be higher than 12,691 A. (b) The current for a 3-phase fault at the motor terminal is: IF,3-phase,motor = VLN / (ZS + Z95mm +Z25 ) = (400 / 3 )/ (0.03042 + j0.01552) = 6,762 A ∠ - 27 tcable, max = k2 S2 / IF 2 = (1152 x 252 ) / 6,7622 = 0.18 s Since tMCCB is less than tcable max, this circuit provides adequate protection against short- circuit current. (c) The earth fault current at the motor frame is: A2301 02245.0j0974.0 230 Z+Z+Z+Z+Z 230 =I 50102595TF motorEF, = + = The touch voltage at the motor is: VT =IEF,motor x (Z10 + Z50 ) = 2301 x ( 0.06698 + j0.00693) = 154.9 V The touch voltage at the earthing terminal at D2 is: VT,D2 = IEF,motor x Z50 = 2301 x ( 0.0231 + j0.00693 ) = 55.5 V G4 The electrical supply to a factory using a TN-S system is shown in Figure G.4. The 750-kVA, 6.6/0.4-kV transformer has a leakage reactance of 5 %. The source impedance at the 6.6-kV network can be neglected. The cable parameters of circuits A and B are given in Table G.5. (a) Determine the current rating and the breaking capacity of the MCCB for circuit A connecting to the motor rated at 100 kW with 90 % efficiency and 0.85 power factor. The motor has a Y-Δ starter and the starting current is four times the full-load current for 15 s. (8 marks)
  • 236. 224 Appendix G (b) Determine whether circuit A is adequately protected against overload current and three phase short-circuit current at the motor terminals. (8 marks) (c) Calculate the fault current in circuit B for an earth fault at the motor terminals and confirm whether circuit B is adequately protected against electric shock. Verify whether the size of CPC for circuit B is appropriate. (9 marks) Table G.5 Cable Parameters Circuit A Circuit B Size 3 x 95 mm2 cu / pvc 3 x 120 mm2 cu / pvc Phase Conductor R* 0.007 Ω per phase 0.006 Ω per phase X* 0.004 Ω per phase 0.004 Ω per phase IZ 207 A 239 A Size 1 x 50 mm2 cu / pvc 1 x 50 mm2 cu / pvc CPC R* 0.014 Ω 0.014 Ω X* 0.003 Ω 0.003 Ω *The values of R and X are for the whole circuit and no temperature correction is required. M M 400 V 400 A MCCB MCCB Circuit B 150 kW 750 kVA 5 % 6.6 kV Circuit A 100 kW Figure G.4 Solution to G4 (a) IB = (100 x 10 ) / (0.9 x 0.85 xB 3 3 x 400) = 189 A IS = 4 x 189 = 756 A The current rating of the MCCB should be higher than 756/2 = 378 A. A current rating of 400 A is recommended. For a base of 0.75 MVA and 400 V, the per unit impedance is 0.213 Ω and the per unit current is 1083 A. The three-phase short-circuit current at the MCCB terminal is IF,3-phase = 1 / 0.05 = 20 per-unit current = 21.66 kA
  • 237. Model Examination Questions with Solution 225 Thus, the breaking capacity of the 400 A MCCB should be higher than 21.66 kA and a breaking capacity of 25 kA is recommended. (b) Required conditions for protection against overload are: (i) IN ≤ IZ (ii) I2 ≤ 1.45 IZ For circuit A IN =400 A, IZ = 207 A, I2 = 1.3 x 400 A =520 A, 1.45 IZ = 1.45 x 207 A =300 A Since conditions (i) and (ii) are not satisfied, circuit A is not protected against overload current accordingly to IEE Regulation 433. The 3-phase fault current at the motor terminal is 14.15 kA and the tcable max is 0.59 s. Since the breaker operating time for a current of 14.15 kA is 0.017 s, (from Fig. 2.13), circuit A is adequately protected against short-circuit currents. (c) The earth fault current at the motor frame is: A623,8 01765.0j02.0 230 Z+Z+Z 230 =I 50120TF Bcircuitmotor,EF, = + = The operating time of the 400 A MCCB at a current of 8623 A is 0.017 s which is less than the required 5 s. Thus circuit B satisfies the protection against electric shock. The maximum time for the CPC to withstand the earth fault current of 8623 A is 0.69 s which is greater than the breaker operating time of 0.017 s. Thus, the size of the CPC is appropriate. G5 The electrical supply to a factory is fed by a 1.6-MVA, 22/0.4-kV transformer that has a reactance of 6 % as shown in Figure 3. The resistance of the transformer is negligible. All the MCCBs have the same time-current characteristic as given in Table G.1. The current ratings and the values of resistance and reactance of each circuit are given in Table 2. a) Recommend the current rating and the minimum breaking capacity of the MCCB for the circuit connecting to the motor, which is rated at 25 kW, 90 % efficiency and 0.9 power factor. The motor utilises a DOL starter. The starting current is seven times the full-load current and such a current would exist for 10 s. (8 marks)
  • 238. 226 Appendix G b) Determine whether the 200-A MCCB for the 4 x 95 mm2 circuit can adequately protect against overload current. State the range of small overload for which this circuit is not protected. If the maximum operating time of the 200-A MCCB is 0.03 s, determine whether the MCCB can adequately protect against short-circuit current for a three-phase fault at the final DB. (9 marks) c) Determine the magnitude of the earth-fault current for an earth fault at the motor terminals and confirm whether the motor circuit has adequate protection against electric shock? Give reasons with calculation. (8 marks) ×× 400 V MCCB 22 kV 4 x 95 mm2 MCCB 4 x 25 mm2 1.6 MVA 200 A 6 % M 1 x 50 mm2 Final DB0.9 Ω 1 x 10 mm2 1 x 300 mm2 1 x 300 mm2 100 A 25 kW Figure G.5 Table G.6 Cable Characteristic Cable Size Current rating Resistance* Reactance* 4 x 95 mm2 207 A 0.007 Ω 0.004 Ω 4 x 25 mm2 89 A 0.008 Ω 0.002 Ω 1 x 50 mm2 - 0.014 Ω 0.003 Ω 1 x 10 mm2 - 0.022 Ω 0.0 Ω 1 x 300 mm2 - 0.0 Ω 0.0 Ω * for the whole circuit length and no temperature correction is required
  • 239. Model Examination Questions with Solution 227 Solution to G5 (a) IB = ( 25 x 10 ) / (0.9 x 0.9 xB 3 3 x 400) = 44.55 A, IS = 7 x 44.55 = 312 A The current rating of the MCCB should be higher than 312/3.3 = 94.5 A. For a base of 1.6 MVA and 0.4 kV, the reactance of the transformer is: XS = 0.1 Ω x 0.06 = 0.006 Ω at 400 V The 3-phase fault current at the final DB is: IF,3-phase,final DB = VLN / (ZS + Z95mm ) =(400 / 3 )/ (0.007 + j0.01) = 18.9 kA ∠ - 55 tcable,max = k2 S2 / IF 2 = (1152 x 952 ) / 18,9002 = 0.334 s The minimum breaking capacity of the MCCB should be higher than the 3- phase fault current at the final DB(i.e. 18.9 kA). (b) Required conditions for protection against overload: (i) IN < IZ (ii) I2 < 1.45 IZ For the 4 x 95 mm2 circuit, IN =200 A, IZ = 207 A, I2 = 1.3 x 200 A = 260 A, 1.45 IZ = 1.45 x 207 A =300 A Conditions (i) and (ii) are satisfied and this circuit is adequately protected against overload current. The range of small overload that this circuit is not protected is from 207.1 A to 259.9 A. Since tcable,max is greater than 0.03 s, this circuit is adequately protected against short-circuit current. (c) The earth fault current at the motor frame is: A4326 015.0j051.0 230 Z+Z+Z+Z+Z+Z 230 =I 30050102595TF motorEF, = + = The operating time of the 100 A MCCB at a current of 4326 A is 0.03 s which is less than the required 5 s and thus it provides adequate protection against electric shock.
  • 240. 228 APPENDIX H VipCoda VipCoda: Visually Interactive Program for Consultant and Owner to Design and Assess electrical systems in building. By utilizing the visually interactive window programming technique and facilities on database access, VipCoda provides an user friendly, visually interactive tool to automate the design process producing a sound and reliable design which meets the code of practice of CP5 (1998) and BS 7671:1992 (IEE wiring regulations, 16th Edition). VipCoda can also be used to automatically assess and evaluate any submitted electrical network systematically within a short time. By utilizing the built-in database structure, all the design assumptions are automatically documented and stored together with the completed design network. Thus, it is also a comprehensive tool for training and upgrading engineers on how to design and assess an electrical network. The completed design including all the technical parameters can be displayed and viewed in exactly the same presentation as reading a single- line diagram generated by AutoCAD. In addition, the calculated fault level and the cumulative voltage drops from the main incoming circuit up to each final circuit are graphically displayed. Facilities are provided to simulate the normal loading, overloading, short circuit and earth fault conditions. A result of pass or fail will be given by assessing through seven critical tests and three non-critical tests. A full explanation as to why, how and by how much the design fails will also be included. H1. Design Element Database All the cable tables given in the IEE wiring regulation and CP5 (1998) are structurally stored in the cable database grouped according to the conductor material, insulation material, and cable construction and installation methods. In addition, fire resistant cables and busways are also represented. Currently, eight types of cables, namely copper PVC, copper MICC, aluminum PVC, aluminum XLPE, copper XLPE, copper fire resistant, copper busway and aluminum busway are available in 969 records. The installation methods include clipped direct, conduit/trunking, thermal insulation and tray for single-core non-armored, multi-core non-armored, single-core armored and multi-core-armored cables. All the cables can be
  • 241. VipCoda 229 interactively selected from a number of simple dialogue boxes and built-in facilities are provided for the user to have a speed search for all CP5 cable tables. Five types of overcurrent protective device, namely ACB, MCCB, MCB, RCCB and fuse are represented. The complete range of the preferred rated current and breaking capacity from the relevant BS and IEC standard are included in a total of 106 records for breakers and fuses. Four types of typical time-current characteristic curves for breaker and fuses are modeled. Current transformers and earth fault relays by IDMT, DTL and ELR are available. H2. Simulation and Testing Seven types of critical tests and two types of non-critical tests are conducted for each circuit in each DB to assess whether a given design is acceptable under normal loading, overloading and short-circuit conditions. Breaker and Cable Load Test. Compute design current (IB) and the rated circuit capacity (I B Z) by considering the ambient temperature and grouping factor. Based on the current rating of the protective device (IN), detect whether IN > IBB and IZ > IB. Compute the circuit loading in percentage of the rated capacity under the specified conditions. B Overload Protection Test. Increase the load current in each circuit to 145% of the rated circuit capacity (IZ) and model the operating time of the protective device. Detect whether the operating time of the protective device is less than the effective operating time of 2 hours. ( i.e. I2 < 1.45 IZ and IN < IZ) Voltage Drop Test. Calculate the voltage drops in volts and in percentage of the rated operating voltage. Check whether the voltage drop is within the required voltage drop tolerance. Short circuit Protection Test. Calculate the 3-phase short-circuit current at the end of each circuit. Check whether the braking capacity of the protective device is higher than the calculated short-circuit current. Model the operating time of protective device under the fault condition. Detect whether the circuit will be disconnected within the critical time, which is the maximum allowable time in seconds to ensure that the temperature in the conductor will not exceed its thermal limit resulting in a failure in insulation material.
  • 242. 230 Appendix H Earth Fault and CPC Test. Calculate the earth fault current at the end of each circuit. Detect whether the cable size of each circuit protective conductor (CPC) is adequate to withstand the earth fault current. Motor Starting Test. Based on the type of starter and the motor rating, calculate the motor starting current. Model the operating time of the protective device and detect whether the protective device will trip during the starting period. Based on the circuit impedance and the source impedance, calculate the voltage dips at the instant when the motor starts. Detect whether the voltage dips will release the contactor in the starter. Electric Shock Protection Test. Calculate the earth fault current and the touch voltage at the end of each circuit. Based on the IEE regulations and solely based on the direct acting overcurrent protective device, check whether the touch voltage is less than 50 V and whether the disconnection time is less than 5 s for a TT system. For a TN system, the earth fault loop impedance is calculated and a check is made to detect whether the disconnection time is less than 0.4 s for hand-held equipment and 5 s for fixed equipment. If the direct acting overcurrent protective device fails to provide the requirements for electric shock protection, the relevant residual protective devices such as RCCB, ELR, E/F and IDMT will be suggested. The operating time is modeled based on the specified CT ratio, time and current settings of the device. The user will be prompted to specify new settings until the requirement on electric shock protection is met. H3. Computer-aided Interactive Design The user may carry out the design work for a main switchboard (MSW), a main distribution board (MDB) or a final distribution board (FDB). Facilities are provided for the user to link the complete network by backward chaining from FDB, MDB to MSW, or a forward chaining from MSW, MDB to FDB. For each circuit, based on the user’s specification on the required type of load and power rating, type of cable, circuit length, fault level of the incoming source etc, the program automates the design process and shows the appropriate breaker and cable including CPC in a single line diagram. Through several built-in rules, the automated design done by VipCoda will ensure that it meets all the seven critical tests. The user may simply click on the single line diagram to change a breaker or a cable in any circuit, or to enter a design done by a contractor. The user may click the ‘speed test’ button to obtain summaries of those tests that
  • 243. VipCoda 231 have detected failure. The user may then click for a particular test to find out the cause of failure or click the ‘redesign’ button to carry out a redesign by the program for one particular circuit, the whole DB or the entire project to automatically rectify all the design errors. Options are provided for load balancing either manually or automatically. Facilities are provided for the user to list or print a technical summary or a cost summary of the whole project. In the technical summary, all the DBs in the specified project are tabulated together with the maximum demand, fault current, earth fault current and the cumulative voltage drop at each DB. For cost summary, the cost for each DB and the total cost of the whole project are listed with breakdown in cable and breaker costs. Tools are also provided for the user to delete or insert a circuit, copy a DB to a project or create a project by modifying from a list of standard projects or previously completed projects. Utilities are also provided for the user to print the single line diagram of a particular DB together with the result of each simulation test. H4. Project Database The successfully designed network of a project can be saved by the built-in project database. This database contains the description of all the switchboards and DBs of the whole project in an automatically arranged structure. Built-in editing facilities are provided for the user to view or edit the project database, design element database or lookup tables that contain the design rules and design assumptions. For verification and confirmation that the design process by VipCoda is accurate, three benchmark projects have been created with all the connected loads and design assumptions specified. In these three benchmark networks, the completed design done by VipCoda represents the unique solution that meets all the given design requirements and specifications, and at the same time there is no over-design in any circuit. Thus the completed network given by VipCoda can be used as a reference to compare a design done manually or by using any other computer aided design program. H5. Visual User Interface VipCoda utilizes all standard Window facilities such as pull down menus, pop-up windows, symbolic icons and various visually interactive dialogue boxes, etc. It is arranged such that all the menus, icons and dialogue boxes are self-documented. The user may simply click a load icon to view the detailed load information, click a circuit icon to view or change the type of cable, temperature correction and grouping factor or click a breaker icon to re-specify the type of breaker or its tripping curve. Tools are provided
  • 244. 232 Appendix H for the user to have an enlarged view on a DB or an overview of the whole project including riser with tap-off and the incoming transformer connection. H6. Related Publications [1] Teo C Y, “A new integrated tool for exercises on the design of electrical installations using a microcomputer”, Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 36, No. 1 PP 81-91, 1996. [2] Teo C Y, “Computer aided design and simulation of low voltage electrical distribution systems”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 34, No. 1, PP 87-94, 1997. [3] Teo C Y, Shen Feng, “Application of artificial intelligence in the design of low voltage electrical system”, Proceeding of the 2000 IEEE Winter Meeting, pp 1784-1789, Vol. 3, 2000. [4] Teo C Y, “An innovative program for the design and assessment of electrical system in buildings”, IEM Bulletin, pp 46-49, 2001. [5] Teo C Y, “Integrated Assessment of Electrical Systems in Buildings Through Simulation Tests”, The Singapore Engineers, pp 27-32, 2003 H7 Contact Details E-mail: cyteo@ntu.edu.sg, URL: www.byte-power.com, Tel: (65) 6256 0101
  • 245. 233 APPENDIX I VipTein VipTein: Visually Interactive Package for the Teaching of Electrical Installation Network in buildings An innovative approach using computer aided design tools to support the teaching of electrical installation through hands-on design exercises is described. It is implemented by an integrated package with all the built-in facilities, which guide students step by step to complete the design of two sizeable electrical installations. The dedicated database structure enables students to get direct access to the building information, details of each type of load and the technical parameters of all the electrical parts required for the design exercise. The built-in dynamic test specification eliminates routine and repetitive design studies and also accelerates the design and learning process. Each error made by each student is prompted on the spot and after each second attempt; the right answer and the student’s wrong answer are shown for comparison. The performance of each student is evaluated automatically through error logs and is summarized by showing the total number of demerit points, which is then converted to a grade of A B C D or E. I1. Training Scope The integrated package is designed to familiarize students with the criteria and procedure for the design of electrical installations in buildings. It guides the student to complete the whole design process. By displaying the floor plan and the connected loads, the student can practise on the estimation of maximum demand based on an assumed demand factor or coincidence factor, and the determination of the design current for various circuits including the incoming circuit. The student can also practise on the selection of appropriate types of breakers, current ratings and the category of duty against overcurrent, fault current and electric shock. It is then followed by the choice of conductor material, type of insulation, installation method and the determination of conductor size. Correction factors to cater for circuit grouping, ambient temperature and thermal insulation as well as voltage drop and motor-starting conditions will be included. Various methods to determine the size of protective conductor,
  • 246. 234 Appendix I and the requirements for individual main incoming circuit including current transformers (CT) for protection and for measurement will be assessed. Knowledge of wiring regulations and the standard code of practice for electrical installation will be inherently acquired through the design process. I2. Size of Design The main menu provides access to the two modules i.e. assess 1 and assess 2. In assess 1, the student is given a hands-on exercise to complete the design of a TT system of a two-level building, which has two shops on each floor. Each shop has a final DB serving a floor area of 15 m x 10 m. The two final DBs on each floor are fed by a main DB, which is then connected to a cable riser. The main switchboard feeds one cable riser, a 55 kW DOL motor, an 80 kW star-delta motor and a DB with an equivalent load of 90 kW. This module allows the student to go through the program once and to familiarise themselves with tools provided in the package as well as the method of design. In assess 2, the student has to complete a sizeable design of 2 MVA electrical installations with two incoming busbars, one emergency busbar and one stand-by generator. A 3-D view and a typical floor plan of a seven- level flatted factor will be displayed. On each level, there are four tenant DBs, one landlord DB and one emergency DB. As level 1 to level 7 are identical, the student only needs to complete the design for one level and the package will make identical copies for all other six levels. At the end of the design, the student will be prompted to determine breaker type and size for each incoming circuit. The student is required to verify the earth fault protection. At the end of the module, the student’s performance is evaluated and given in an overall score summary. I3. Visual User Interface VipTein utilizes all standard Window facilities such as pull down menus, pop- up windows, symbolic icons and various visually interactive dialogue boxes, etc. It is arranged such that all the menus, icons and dialogue boxes are self-documented. At run time, the student may simply click the Hint label to view the relevant formulae or the Legend label for the relevant description. Warning and guiding messages such as cable or breaker under size or oversize will be displayed accordingly whenever the student makes a mistake and all the relevant data such as load description, cable
  • 247. Viptein 235 specification, etc will also be listed for the student to make the right selection. For each test, in the first attempt, if the answer given by the student is wrong, the relevant formulae will be given. In the second attempt, if the answer is still wrong, VipTein will show the student’s wrong answer together with the correct answer. A well-done message will be always prompted whenever the student enters the right answer. To keep the student informed on the performance and status, the student’s current cumulated demerit points and the number of outstanding buses are displayed at the beginning of each section. For short circuit analysis, relevant breaker’s tripping curves and cable withstand limit are graphically shown. Tools are provided for the student to have an enlarged view on a DB or an overview of the whole project including riser with tap-off and the incoming transformer connection. I4. Assessment Criteria and Grading The evaluation of a trainee’s performance focuses on ten categories, namely circuit breaker selection, design current calculation, cable sizing, short circuit analysis, earth fault analysis, motor starting, voltage drop calculation, load connection and load balance. All errors made by the student are logged and evaluated automatically by demerit points. The instructor may adjust the number of demerit points for each type of error and the conversion from the total demerit points to an appropriate grade. I5. Dynamic Instructor Control VipTein provides built-in features for the instructor to specify a total of 28 tests grouped under 10 categories in a test specification database file. It is also structured according to three main options, namely technical college, polytechnic and university. In each option, the instructor may specify the number and identification of each DB in assess 1 and in assess 2. For each DB, the instructor may specify the desired types of test according to the students’ capability. In general, the test file for technical college will be easier and that for university will be more difficult and each could be focused on different categories. To eliminate repetitive calculation, for some tests that involve a number of steps, the instructor can specify a step number in the test and the system will give the relevant answer of the previous step and jump to the specified steps to test a student. In this way, although the type of building is identical, the scope, duration and depth of study can be dynamically adjusted.
  • 248. 236 Appendix I I6. Related Publications [1] Gooi H. B., Teo C. Y., “A Project-oriented Power Engineering Curriculum”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 10, No. 1, PP 27-33, 1995 [2] Teo C. Y., “A New Integrated Tool for Design Exercise of Electrical Installations Using a Microcomputer “ Journal of Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 36, No. 2, PP 81-90, 1996 [3] Teo C Y , “ A More Practical Approach to Integrate Low Voltage Distribution System into the Electrical Engineering Curriculum”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp 1199-1204, 1998 [4] Teo C Y and F. Shen, “Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Design of Low Voltage Electrical System”, IEEE Winter Meeting 2000 [5] Teo C Y, ”Integrated Assessment of Electrical Systems in Buildings Through Simulation Tests” Magazine of Singapore Engineer, pp 31- 36, 2003 [6] Teo Cheng Yu, “Teaching of Power Engineering Through E-learning with Laboratory Automated Assessment”, ICEE, International Conference on Engineering and Education, March 2009 I7 Contact Details E-mail: cyteo@ntu.edu.sg, URL: www.byte-power.com, Tel: (65) 6256 0101
  • 249. 237 INDEX 32M63, 119 Accuracy and comparison, 171 Active connected load, 137 Actual required power, 127 Adiabatic equation, 75, 76 Admittance matrix, 161 Air circuit-breaker (ACB), 37 Ambient temperature correction factor (Ca), 55 American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 28 Arc chutes, 27 Arc extinction, 27 Arc voltage, 27 Arc-extinguishing, 104 Arcing time, 106 Assessment and costing, 178 Automated marking and grading, 187 Automatic disconnection of supply, 92 Automatic drafting, 179 Automatic interruption, 23 Automatic operation, 93 AWG/MCM, 54 Back-up for circuit breakers, 122 Back-up protection, 122, 12 Base current, 155 Base impedance, 155 Basic design procedure, 132 Bi-metallic overload trip, 24 Breaker and cable load test, 182 Breaking capacity, 23, 105, 122, 123, 143 British Standard (BS), 28 BS88 fuse, 47 Built-in overcurrent tripping device, 37 Built-in overload release, 70 Cable’s withstand capability, 76 Cable construction, 50 Cable selection, 53 Cable utilisation test, 182 Cable utilisation, 68 CAD package, 173 Calculation of short-circuit currents, 153 Capacitance effect, 84 Characteristics of generating plants, 3 Circuit loading, 137 Circuit protective conductor, 87 Class I equipment, 86, 93 Coincidence factor, 129, 141 Common base values, 155, 161 Complex matrix, 163 Computational flow chart, 163 Computer-aided design, 173 Conductor material, 55 Conductor temperature on voltage drop, 64 Conductor temperature, 78 Conduits and trunking systems, 52 Consumer installations, 17 Conventional fusing current (If), 105 Conventional non-fusing current (Inf), 105 Conventional time, 105 Correction factor, 55 Cost of distribution system, 2 Critical conductor temperature, 78 Critical operating times, 143, 144 Critical temperature, 66, 72 Critical time, 72, 149 Current limiting system, 27 Current rating, 31, 36 Cut-off current, 106, 107 D.C. testing after installation, 54 Degree of overload protection, 67 Delta-earthed wye connection, 80, 82 Demand factor, 127, 139 Demerit point system, 186, 187 Design current, 46, 58, 126 Design elements, 173, 181 Design files, 177, 178 Design methods, 177 Design procedures, 125, 131 Direct contact, 51, 125 Disconnection time, 120 Discrete drawing elements, 181 Discrimination, 121, 122 Distribution system, 8 Diversity, 131 Drafting module, 181 Drawing files, 180 Earth electrode resistance, 95
  • 250. 238 Index Earth electrode, 89 Earth fault current, 80 Earth fault loop impedance, 89, 93, 96 Earth fault protection, 92, 149 Earth leakage current, 41, 42 Earthing conductor, 89 Earthing in utility system, 80 Earthing, 80 Effective operating time, 66 Effective operation, 71 Electric shock, 39, 40, 92, 98, 120, 125 Electromagnetic trip, 24, 26, 29, 94 Emergency distribution board, 147 Equipotential bonding conductor, 88 Equipotential zone, 89, 90 Equivalent resistance network, 159, 160 European Standards (EN), 28 Exposed-conductive parts, 40, 86,125 External earth fault loop impedance, 99 Extraneous-conductive parts, 86 Fault current calculation, 165 Fault current distribution, 164 Fault level, 154, 165 Final circuit, 126 Fire resistant cables, 53 Full and partial test, 187 Fuse factors, 113 Fuse-base, 104 Fuse-holder, 104 Gates for fuse, 110 General purpose socket outlets, 129, 130 Generation expansion planning, 1 Generation System, 3 gG fuse-links, 105, 107, 110 Ground-return circuit, 153 Grouping correction factor (Cg), 56, 57 Hands-on design exercises, 186 High breaking fuses, 112 High impedance earth fault, 40 High-resistance earthing, 84 I2 t, 106, 107 IDMT relay, 102 Indirect contact, 39, 92, 125 Industrial lighting, 130 Industrial standards, 28 Installation earthing, 86 Installation methods, 55 Instantaneous tripping, 31 Insulating materials, 53, 55 Integrated drawing elements, 181 Integrated tools for teaching, 186 Interconnected network cut, 11 International Electromechanical Commission (IEC), 28 Inverted Y-matrix, 161 IT system, 85, 92 Let-through operating I2 t, 117 Lighting circuit, 131 Lighting in building, 130 Line-to-line fault, 77 Line-to-neutral short-circuit current, 79 Line-to-neutral fault, 77 Live conductive part, 40 Load estimation, 129 Load flow simulation, 8 Loss of discrimination, 125 Low breaking fuses, 112 Low-impedance path, 86 Low-voltage (LV) system, 13 Low-voltage fuses, 112 M9, 31 Main and backup protections, 12 Main contacts, 41 Main equipotential bonding, 89, 95 Main incoming circuit, 142 Maintenance free, 30 Making capacity, 23, 24 Maximum break time, 44 Maximum demand, 3, 126, 127, 129, 131, 139, 141 Maximum disconnection time, 93, 102 Maximum earth fault current, 82 Maximum earth fault loop impedance, 120, 121 Maximum operating time, 72 Maximum running capacity, 4 Maximum short-circuit current, 153 Maximum time delay, 102 MCCB standards, 35 Methods of system earthing, 82 Mineral insulated metal sheathed cables, 53 Miniature circuit-breakers (MCB), 29 Miniature fuses, 111
  • 251. Index 239 Minimum tabulated current rating, 70 MIPTEIN, 173, 181, 188 Modelling and checking processes, 173 Motor circuit, 118, 135 Motor starting current, 46, 118 Motor starting test, 185 Motor-operated mechanism, 34 Moulded case circuit breakers (MCCB), 33 National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA), 28 Non-destructive performance, 33 OG boxes, 116 OL_P_Yes, 67, 68 Omission of overload protection, 69 Operating cost, 4 Operating I2 t, 118, 121 Operating time, 26, 45 Operating-arcing I2 t , 124 Operation of RCCBs, 42 Overground (OG) boxes, 15 Overload protection test, 183 Partial design, 187 Plug setting, 102 Power dissipation, 111, 113 Pre-arcing I2 t, 106 , 121, 123 Pre-arcing time, 106 Preferred operating conditions, 58 Principle of operation, 41 Prospective current, 105, 106 Protection against overload, 65 Protection against short circuit, 71 Protection on TN system, 92 Protection on TT system, 95 Protective conductor, 86, 88, 90 PVC-sheathed cables, 53 Q1 fuse-links, 116 Quick-acting, 111 Radial circuit arrangement, 10, 133 Radially operated LV network, 17 Range of small overload, 67 Rated breaking capacity, 36, 39 Rated conditional short-circuit current, 44 Rated current (IN), 23 Rated current, 39 Rated making capacity, 36 Rated residual operating current, 43 RCCB standards, 43 Reactance earthing, 84, 85 Reactive connected load, 137 Record structure, 173 Required conditions for overload protection, 66 Required conditions for short circuit protection, 71 Residual current device, 94 Residual current, 40 Residual current-operated circuit breaker (RCCB), 39 Resistance earthing, 84 Resistance-earthed neutral, 82, 84 Resistance-temperature coefficient, 63 Ring circuit arrangement, 11, 133 SC_P_Yes, 72 Schemes of connection, 9 Search coil, 41 Separate X and R reductions, 155 Service continuity, 83 Shock voltage, 91, 95 Short circuit protection, 148 Short circuit thermal stresses, 52 Short-circuit capacity, 31 Short-circuit protection test, 184 Short-circuit protection, 142 Shut trip elements, 34 Simulation tests, 181 Singapore Standard (SS), 28 Equivalent impedance, 165, 170 Single-line diagram, 19, 140, 180 Sizing of conductor, 50 Sm_OL_No, 68 Small overloads, 68 Solidly earthed system, 80, 84, 85 Solidly grounded, 153 Source of fault currents, 153 Specific resistance, 51 Specified time, 93 Standard code for diversity, 130 Standard size of conductors, 54 Start-up cost, 4 Starter with overload release, 69 Starting condition, 119 Status switches, 34 Step-by-step calculations, 154 Step-by-step design procedures, 18
  • 252. 240 Index Sub-transient reactance, 154 Supply interruption, 125 Synchronous reactance, 154 System earth, 80 System fault levels, 7 System frequency responses, 4 System neutral, 80 Systematic calculation, 161 Tabulated current carrying capacities (It), 55 Tabulated current rating, 58 Tabulated voltage drop constant (TVD), 60 Tabulated voltage-drop constant, 78 Tap-off unit, 168 Temperature correction on resistive value, 63 Tenant distribution board, 19 Testing on completed cables, 53 Thermal capacity constant, 88 Thermal constraint, 101 Thermal damage, 74, 124 Thermal insulation correction factor (Ci), 59 Thermal limit, 102, 143, 149 Thermal trip,24, 25, 29 Three-phase fault, 77, 153 Time multiplier setting (TMS), 102 Time-current characteristic, 24, 31, 32, 41 Time-current zone, 109, 110, 115 Time-lag, 111 TN-C-S system, 91 TN-S system, 90, 91, 99 Total connected load, 126, 127 Total system investment, 2 Touch voltage, 89, 92 Transformer impedance, 155 Transient conditions, 60 Transient overvoltage, 84 Transient reactance, 154 Transmission network, 1 Transmission system, 4 Trip coil, 41 Trip-free operation, 34 Tripping mechanisms, 24 Tripping time, 26 TT system, 88, 120 Turbo Pascal, 174 Type B MCB, 47 Type C MCB, 33 Typical LV board, 16 Typical OG box, 16 Typical values of k, 72 Underwriters Labs (UL), 28 Unearthed system, 82, 84 Unit commitment, 5 Unit protection, 12 Utilisation voltage, 5 Utility fault level, 155 Utility LV networks, 13 Verification of discrimination, 178 Voltage drop calculation, 60, 61 Voltage drop constraints, 146 Voltage drop formulae, 61 Voltage drop requirements, 52 Voltage drop test, 184 Y-matrix, 163 Zero point extinguishing system, 27 Zones of unit protection, 14