SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Experimenting with Pre-Contact Strategies for Reducing Nonresponse in an
                               Economic Survey

       Richard S. Hough, Kenneth Pick, and Alfred D. Tuttle, U.S. Census Bureau 1
                     Jeri M. Mulrow, National Science Foundation1

Introduction

Non-response in economic surveys poses at least as great a challenge as it does in
demographic surveys, but the reasons for it are less well understood. Finding the right
person within an organization with the necessary authority and access to requested
information to facilitate completion of a survey can be very challenging, especially when
the survey requires responses from multiple people throughout the company. However,
the assignment of responsibility for the survey is one aspect of the survey process that
is outside of the control of the survey organization.

The Business R&D and Innovation Survey (BRDIS) is a new survey sponsored jointly by
the National Science Foundation and the U.S. Census Bureau that measures research
and development (R&D) activities of U.S.-based companies. The sample is comprised
of approximately 40,000 companies. Of these, approximately 4,000 companies with
total R&D costs of at least three million dollars are sent the “long” form (BRDI-1) and the
remainder, with total R&D not known or known to be under three million dollars, receive
a “short” form (BRDI-1A). The new survey is organized into several topical sections and
explicitly instructs the “survey coordinator” to seek the assistance of various types of
specialized personnel within the companies. Therefore the selection of a coordinator
capable of obtaining assistance from likely respondents throughout the company is
critical to accurate and complete response.

To maximize the success of the new survey we decided to investigate an alternative
strategy for getting the survey to the appropriate respondents, and thus, reducing
nonresponse. We conducted a split-sample experiment with historically problematic
respondents and non-responders to the SIRD who would be receiving the BRDI-1. In
the control treatment, we sent the new survey to the last company contact for the SIRD
or to an updated contact from the Census Bureau’s Business Register. In the
experimental treatment, we sent a pre-survey letter to a company executive (CEO,
president, VP of research, etc.) with a request that s/he provide contact information for
an employee capable of coordinating the company’s response to the survey. We will
present the overall results of this experiment and compare responses to the pre-survey
contact update request as well as to the survey itself.




1
 This report is released to inform interested parties of research and to encourage discussion.
The views expressed on methodological, technical, or operational issues are those of the authors
and not necessarily those of the U.S. Census Bureau or the National Science Foundation.

More Related Content

PPTX
Introduction to market research with ans
PDF
Top 10 Public Relations Research Insights of 2015
PPTX
Pcc mktg 6 chapter 2
PPT
Business research methods chap003
PPTX
Corner furniture
PDF
Tasas - 1C2011 - 1C2011
PPTX
The Subtle Dynamics of Leading Without Authority as a Technical Lead - Oren E...
Introduction to market research with ans
Top 10 Public Relations Research Insights of 2015
Pcc mktg 6 chapter 2
Business research methods chap003
Corner furniture
Tasas - 1C2011 - 1C2011
The Subtle Dynamics of Leading Without Authority as a Technical Lead - Oren E...

Viewers also liked (17)

PDF
People Mangement Awards 2015
PPTX
How Do You Manage Your Workforce Compliance?
PDF
New England PBA Informational Paper
PPTX
4 Ways to Merge IBM i Data with Microsoft Excel
PDF
Orca HRM/HRIS on Idealounge
DOC
Internet and the Church - Survey Results
PDF
Ke chuyen ve kim loai(q2) 784
PPT
Boston and Cambridge SEO Meetup - Content Marketing Tips
PDF
Did you know newsletter eau suppl 2015
PPT
ESTC 2011 Presentation by Albert Teo, Borneo Eco Tours
PDF
Islamophobia and the media post 911
PDF
Alzheimers facts figures 2013
PDF
Split Media folio 2013
DOC
Bronchial Asthma in Acute Exacerbation, Diabetes Mellitus-Type II, Hyperchole...
PDF
Cloud services From Calsoftlabs
PDF
Compounding World Feb-2011
PDF
New Generation of Storage Tiering
People Mangement Awards 2015
How Do You Manage Your Workforce Compliance?
New England PBA Informational Paper
4 Ways to Merge IBM i Data with Microsoft Excel
Orca HRM/HRIS on Idealounge
Internet and the Church - Survey Results
Ke chuyen ve kim loai(q2) 784
Boston and Cambridge SEO Meetup - Content Marketing Tips
Did you know newsletter eau suppl 2015
ESTC 2011 Presentation by Albert Teo, Borneo Eco Tours
Islamophobia and the media post 911
Alzheimers facts figures 2013
Split Media folio 2013
Bronchial Asthma in Acute Exacerbation, Diabetes Mellitus-Type II, Hyperchole...
Cloud services From Calsoftlabs
Compounding World Feb-2011
New Generation of Storage Tiering
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
_Dispute Resolution_July 2022.pptxmhhghhhh
DOCX
PRACTICE-TEST-12 is specially designed for those
PDF
202s5_Luciano André Deitos Koslowski.pdf
PPTX
FINAL PPT.pptx cfyufuyfuyuy8ioyoiuvy ituyc utdfm v
PDF
MCQ Practice CBT OL Official Language 1.pptx.pdf
PPT
ALLIED MATHEMATICS -I UNIT III MATRICES.ppt
PPTX
GPAT Presentation PPT and details about imp topics.pptx
PPT
notes_Lecture2 23l3j2 dfjl dfdlkj d 2.ppt
PDF
LSR CASEBOOK 2024-25.pdf. very nice casbook
PPT
pwm ppt .pdf long description of pwm....
PDF
iTop VPN Crack Latest Version 2025 Free Download With Keygen
PDF
Shopify Store Management_ Complete Guide to E-commerce Success.pdf
PDF
Parts of Speech Quiz Presentation in Orange Blue Illustrative Style.pdf.pdf
PPTX
Definition and Relation of Food Science( Lecture1).pptx
PPTX
Prokaryotes v Eukaryotes PowerPoint.pptx
PPT
2- CELL INJURY L1 Medical (2) gggggggggg
PPTX
Principles of Inheritance and variation class 12.pptx
PPTX
AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION AND CAREER OPPORTUNITIES FOR COMMUNICATORS AND JOURNA...
PPTX
Your Guide to a Winning Interview Aug 2025.
PPTX
employee on boarding for jobs for freshers try it
_Dispute Resolution_July 2022.pptxmhhghhhh
PRACTICE-TEST-12 is specially designed for those
202s5_Luciano André Deitos Koslowski.pdf
FINAL PPT.pptx cfyufuyfuyuy8ioyoiuvy ituyc utdfm v
MCQ Practice CBT OL Official Language 1.pptx.pdf
ALLIED MATHEMATICS -I UNIT III MATRICES.ppt
GPAT Presentation PPT and details about imp topics.pptx
notes_Lecture2 23l3j2 dfjl dfdlkj d 2.ppt
LSR CASEBOOK 2024-25.pdf. very nice casbook
pwm ppt .pdf long description of pwm....
iTop VPN Crack Latest Version 2025 Free Download With Keygen
Shopify Store Management_ Complete Guide to E-commerce Success.pdf
Parts of Speech Quiz Presentation in Orange Blue Illustrative Style.pdf.pdf
Definition and Relation of Food Science( Lecture1).pptx
Prokaryotes v Eukaryotes PowerPoint.pptx
2- CELL INJURY L1 Medical (2) gggggggggg
Principles of Inheritance and variation class 12.pptx
AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION AND CAREER OPPORTUNITIES FOR COMMUNICATORS AND JOURNA...
Your Guide to a Winning Interview Aug 2025.
employee on boarding for jobs for freshers try it
Ad

Experimenting with Pre-Contact Strategies for Reducing Nonresponse in an Economic Survey

  • 1. Experimenting with Pre-Contact Strategies for Reducing Nonresponse in an Economic Survey Richard S. Hough, Kenneth Pick, and Alfred D. Tuttle, U.S. Census Bureau 1 Jeri M. Mulrow, National Science Foundation1 Introduction Non-response in economic surveys poses at least as great a challenge as it does in demographic surveys, but the reasons for it are less well understood. Finding the right person within an organization with the necessary authority and access to requested information to facilitate completion of a survey can be very challenging, especially when the survey requires responses from multiple people throughout the company. However, the assignment of responsibility for the survey is one aspect of the survey process that is outside of the control of the survey organization. The Business R&D and Innovation Survey (BRDIS) is a new survey sponsored jointly by the National Science Foundation and the U.S. Census Bureau that measures research and development (R&D) activities of U.S.-based companies. The sample is comprised of approximately 40,000 companies. Of these, approximately 4,000 companies with total R&D costs of at least three million dollars are sent the “long” form (BRDI-1) and the remainder, with total R&D not known or known to be under three million dollars, receive a “short” form (BRDI-1A). The new survey is organized into several topical sections and explicitly instructs the “survey coordinator” to seek the assistance of various types of specialized personnel within the companies. Therefore the selection of a coordinator capable of obtaining assistance from likely respondents throughout the company is critical to accurate and complete response. To maximize the success of the new survey we decided to investigate an alternative strategy for getting the survey to the appropriate respondents, and thus, reducing nonresponse. We conducted a split-sample experiment with historically problematic respondents and non-responders to the SIRD who would be receiving the BRDI-1. In the control treatment, we sent the new survey to the last company contact for the SIRD or to an updated contact from the Census Bureau’s Business Register. In the experimental treatment, we sent a pre-survey letter to a company executive (CEO, president, VP of research, etc.) with a request that s/he provide contact information for an employee capable of coordinating the company’s response to the survey. We will present the overall results of this experiment and compare responses to the pre-survey contact update request as well as to the survey itself. 1 This report is released to inform interested parties of research and to encourage discussion. The views expressed on methodological, technical, or operational issues are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the U.S. Census Bureau or the National Science Foundation.