A Case of Device Closure of an Eccentric Atrial Septal Defect Using a Large Device

Review began 07/19/2022
Review ended 07/25/2022
Published 07/29/2022
© Copyright 2022
Barik et al. This is an open access article
distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0.,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution,
and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original author and source are credited.
A Case of Device Closure of an Eccentric Atrial
Septal Defect Using a Large Device
Ramachandra Barik Sr. , Rudrapratap Mahapatra
1. Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, IND 2. Cardiothoracic Surgery, All
India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, IND
Corresponding author: Ramachandra Barik Sr., cardioramachandra@gmail.com
Abstract
Device closure of an eccentric atrial septal defect can be challenging and needs technical modifications to
avoid unnecessary complications. Here, we present a case of a 45-year-old woman who underwent device
closure of an eccentric defect with a large device. The patient developed pericardial effusion and left-sided
pleural effusion due to injury to the junction of right atrium and superior vena cava because of the
malalignment of the delivery sheath and left atrial disc before the device was pulled across the eccentric
defect despite releasing the left atrial disc in the left atrium in place of the left pulmonary vein. These two
serious complications were managed conservatively with close monitoring of the case during and after the
procedure.
Categories: Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery, Cardiology, Radiology
Keywords: right atrial and superior vena junction injury, device closure, large device, eccentric location, atrial septal
defect
Introduction
Device closure is recommended as class I and level B indication for an ostium secundum atrial septal defect
(OS ASD) with suitable anatomy without significant pulmonary arterial hypertension [1]. The anatomy of the
atrial defect is the most important factor when deciding between surgery and transcatheter closure [2].
Device closure of an eccentric OS ASD eccentric defect with a large device is challenging and needs technical
modifications to avoid unnecessary complications [3-5]. When the ASD has malaligned, eccentric or
deficient rims, then the wiring of the left upper pulmonary vein, negotiation of the sheath and dilator and
the release of the left atrial disk are challenging and technical modifications are needed for the successful
deployment of the device [5].
This case was previously presented as an e-poster titled "Device closure of an eccentric atrial septal defect
using a large device" at CSI Frankfurt 2022 (June 22-25, 2022).
Case Presentation
A 45-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation was admitted for transcatheter closure of an atrial septal defect.
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) showed an OS ASD of size 30 mm in the four-chamber view and of
21 mm in the bicaval view. The total length of the interatrial septum was 6 cm. The defect had a deficient
retro-aortic rim; the superior vena cava (SVC) rim was 8 mm. Therefore, the defect was considered eccentric,
with the location of the defect seen in relation to the length of the interatrial septum (Figure 1A). The
pulmonary veins were draining into the left atrium without any turbulent flow as seen in TEE. The right
ventricular systolic pressure was 41 mmHg. The coronary angiogram was normal. Informed consent was
taken and the Heart team was consulted.
1 2
Open Access Case
Report DOI: 10.7759/cureus.27447
How to cite this article
Barik R, Mahapatra R (July 29, 2022) A Case of Device Closure of an Eccentric Atrial Septal Defect Using a Large Device. Cureus 14(7): e27447.
DOI 10.7759/cureus.27447

FIGURE 1: Transesophageal echocardiography around the intervention
It shows the (A) eccentric location of the atrial septal defect (arrow), (B) appearance of the pericardial effusion
before plugging the defect (arrows), (C) plugging of the defect with the device and progressing effusion (arrows),
(D) proper deployment of the device with a significant pericardial effusion (arrow).
The defect was tried to plug through femoral access using a 34-mm Lifetech ASD device (Lifetech
Scientific Co., Shenzhen, China) using the 14-Fr dedicated sheath. The procedure was done under
fluoroscopic and TEE guidance. We noticed the tortuous course of the 0.035 inch x 260 cm Terumo guide
wire (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and 5-Fr Judkins right (JR) diagnostic catheter combo in
attempting to wire the left upper pulmonary vein, which was mostly due to the cranial position of the
catheter more towards the junction of SVC and right atrium (SVC-RA) because of the eccentric defect, i.e.,
the interatrial septal length of 60 mm, 30-mm defect and 8-mm SVC rim (Figure 2A). The 14-Fr sheath and
its dilator were advanced from the groin till the combo reached the level of the hepatic vein in the inferior
vena cava. The dilator was exchanged with a 5-Fr JR diagnostic catheter, and this combo was advanced into
the left atrium over the Terumo guide wire in the place of the extra-stiff Amplatzer guide wire (Boston
Scientific, Marlborough, MA) to avoid injury. It was noticed in TEE that the combo of the 14-Fr sheath and
the diagnostic 5-Fr was not at all through the centre of the defect. Therefore, the upper end of the delivery
sheath was parked in the left atrium before loading the ASD device into the delivery sheath. The release of
the left atrial disc was initiated in the left atrium rather than the left upper pulmonary vein (Figure 2B).
Despite this precaution, we noticed pericardial effusion before plugging the defect probably due to the SVC-
RA junction injury because of the more cranial position of the sheath and the partially released left atrial
disc close to the SVC-RA junction (Figure 1B). The device seated properly across the ASD when it was pulled
down across the defect (Figures 1C, 1D, 2C). Pericardial effusion progressed to a depth of 10 mm within one
hour after device implantation (Figure 1D). A pigtail aspiration was initiated (Figure 2D).
2022 Barik et al. Cureus 14(7): e27447. DOI 10.7759/cureus.27447 2 of 5

FIGURE 2: Fluoroscopy during the procedure
Images show the (A) unusual course of the Amplatzer extra-stiff guide wire to the left upper pulmonary vein
because of the eccentric location of the defect (arrow), (B) partial release of the left atrial disc in the left atrium
rather than the upper pulmonary vein (arrow), (C) immediate perfect position of the device after releasing it
(arrow) and (D) stable device position during pericardial tapping using pigtail aspiration (arrow).
A follow-up contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scan performed the next morning revealed a
contained tear of 2.1 cm in the SVC-RA junction, and the left upper pulmonary vein was noticed to be
tortuous without any apparent injury. One unit of fresh blood was given. One gram tranexamic acid was
given IV followed by 500 mg every eight hours for the next two days. We had a second aspiration of 400 ml
after 36 hours and third aspiration of 200 ml after 48 hours. The CECT showed significant left-sided pleural
effusion that was detected when the patient was evaluated for room air desaturation on the second day of
the procedure. The insertion of intercostal drainage tube showed 400 ml of the haemorrhagic effusion that
reduced to nil after another 48 hours (Figure 3). The right ventricular failure and elevated right ventricular
pressure was managed by diuretics, digoxin, and pulmonary vasodilators. She was successfully discharged on
the sixth day after transcatheter closure. This patient has completed the six-month follow-up and is
asymptomatic. Now, she is on metoprolol succinate, digoxin, and rivaroxaban 10 mg for atrial fibrillation.

FIGURE 3: Chest X-ray after transcatheter closure of the atrial septal
defect
The anteroposterior view shows the intercostal drainage tube in the pleural cavity (right arrow) and the pigtail
catheter in the pericardial cavity (left arrow).
Balloon sizing of the defect and left atrial appendage closure were not performed in this case because of
financial constraints.
Discussion
When an atrial defect is large, has rim deficiency, is fenestrated, and there are multiple atrial septal defects
in the same patient, the defect is called a complex atrial septal defect that poses challenges during
transcatheter closure. Malzahn et al. performed device closure of the large atrial defects in consecutive 275
patients [6]. The incidence of periprocedural complications was noticed in 20.4% cases and pericardial
effusion was noticed in 5.5% cases. In an adult, an ASD that is bigger than 25 mm in size is called a large
defect [7]. The device is called large when the device size is larger than 30 mm; the rims are called adequate
when they are at least 5 mm. In our case, the retro-aortic rim was deficient, which is acceptable for
transcatheter closure in most of the studies. Some of the complications like arrhythmia, pericardial effusion,
device embolization, cardiac perforation, cardio-embolic stroke, and haemoglobinuria are immediate.
Timely diagnosis of such rare complications using 2D echo, TEE or CECT is required for proper management
by a conservative or surgical approach as observed in a study by Batta et al. [8]. Thanopoulos et al. in a study
showed that ASDs with isolated rim deficiency can be safely closed without any significant complications if
proper techniques are used [9]. Device closure of an ASD with complex anatomy is possible using several
modified techniques [5]. The stiff sheath with dilator negotiation in such situations may cause cardiac
perforation in the cases of larger defects, as in our case, which need close monitoring during the procedure
using both TEE and fluoroscopy [10]. There may be cardiac perforation during sheath negotiation of
anchoring the device across the defect. An abnormal course of the guide wire during parking the extra-stiff
guide wire in the left upper pulmonary vein may cause injury to the pulmonary vein that may manifest as a
pleural effusion as in our case [6]. However, close monitoring and appropriate conservative management

may sometimes save the patient undergoing cardiac surgery [11]. Although it is rare to encounter remote
cardiac erosion despite the successful closure of an atrial septal defect, regular follow-up of the patients is
essential as observed in a study by Zhang and Ding [12].
Conclusions
Device closure of an eccentric and large atrial septal defect may be challenging. Patients should be closely
monitored during and after the procedure. Many a time minor cardiac perforation can be managed
conservatively or by surgery without explanting the device if device alignment is proper.
Additional Information
Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In
compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services
info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the
submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial
relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an
interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other
relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
References
1. Stout KK, Daniels CJ, Aboulhosn JA, et al.: 2018 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management of adults with
congenital heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task
Force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019, 73:e81-e192. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1029
2. Le Gloan L, Legendre A, Iserin L, Ladouceur M: Pathophysiology and natural history of atrial septal defect . J
Thorac Dis. 2018, 10:S2854-63. 10.21037/jtd.2018.02.80
3. Takaya Y, Akagi T, Nakagawa K, et al.: Clinical significance of septal malalignment for transcatheter closure
of atrial septal defect. J Interv Cardiol. 2020, 2020:6090612. 10.1155/2020/6090612
4. Jung SY, Kim AY, Jung JW, Choi JY: Procedural, early and long-term outcomes after percutaneous closure of
atrial septal defect: comparison between large and very large atrial septal defect groups. Korean Circ J. 2019,
49:975-86. 10.4070/kcj.2018.0391
5. Jung SY, Choi JY: Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect: principles and available devices . J Thorac Dis.
2018, 10:S2909-22. 10.21037/jtd.2018.02.19
6. Malzahn L, Bertog S, Sievert K, et al.: Transcatheter closure of large atrial septal defects in adults. (Article in
press). Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022, 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.03.016
7. Thanopoulos BV, Soendergaard L, Ngugen HL, et al.: International experience with the use of Cocoon septal
occluder for closure of atrial septal defects. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2021, 62:206-11. 10.1016/j.hjc.2020.12.009
8. Batta A, Naganur S, Rajan A, Ary KA, Gawalkar A, Barwad P: Retrieval and repositioning of an embolized
atrial septal defect closure device using a gooseneck snare. Egypt Heart J. 2021, 73:51. 10.1186/s43044-021-
00175-4
9. Savis A, Simpson J: Echocardiographic approach to catheter closure of atrial septal defects: patient
selection, procedural guidance and post-procedural checks. Echo Res Pract. 2018, 5:R49-64. 10.1530/ERP-
18-0007
10. Zhu P, Qiang H, Liu F, Xie P, Zheng S, Sun Y: Clinical evaluation of percutaneous and intra-operative device
closure of atrial septal defects under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance: one center experience
and mid-term follow-up. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020, 15:20. 10.1186/s13019-020-1071-z
11. Everett AD, Jennings J, Sibinga E, et al.: Community use of the amplatzer atrial septal defect occluder:
results of the multicenter MAGIC atrial septal defect study. Pediatr Cardiol. 2009, 30:240-7. 10.1007/s00246-
008-9325-x
12. Zhang ZQ, Ding JW: Perforation of the atrial wall and aortic sinus after closure of an atrial septal defect
with an Atriasept occluder: a case report. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021, 16:53. 10.1186/s13019-021-01441-x

A Case of Device Closure of an Eccentric Atrial Septal Defect Using a Large Device

More Related Content

Similar to A Case of Device Closure of an Eccentric Atrial Septal Defect Using a Large Device (10)

More from https://aiimsbhubaneswar.nic.in/ (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

A Case of Device Closure of an Eccentric Atrial Septal Defect Using a Large Device