2. Ethics in Research
• Research: a class of activity designed to develop or
contribute to generalizable knowledge
• Generalizable knowledge consists of: theories, principles
or relationships or accumulation of information on which
they are based
• Ethics : a general term for the immaterial values, norms &
attitude
In research ethic has two part:
Research ethics
Researcher’s ethics ( Scientist’s personal honesty)
2
3. Ethics in Research
• Main concern is ensuring fundamental principles:
Respect for persons /autonomy
Beneficence and Non Maleficence &
Justice
• These principles are essential regarding human right
dignity & well-being
3
4. Ethics in Research …
• A research can be approved if it is both ethically &
methodologically sound
• Ethical Review committees ( ERCs) are formed to
protect the human subject
• ERCs shall ensure that researchers have thought of
ethical issues, specifically no:
Harm will be done
Resources will be wasted in the name of research
4
5. Ethics in Research …
• It should be understood in the mind of investigators,
that risks in health research undertakings, do not
out weigh potential benefits.
• Research ethics gives more emphasis that the well-
being of research participant should take
precedence over the interest of science
Eg: Genetic studies
• ERCs stand on the side of study participants to
protect their rights, dignity and benefits
5
6. General objectives of ethics in research
• To safeguard the study participants from any
harm discomfort or risk related to research.
• To assure that individual/ community benefits and
civil rights are being respected and fairness is
maintained.
6
7. Specific objectives:
• To safeguard the participants from any harm, risk,
discomfort (physical, emotional, psychological,
social)
• To ensure participation is voluntarily with written
informed and signed consent
• To monitor and evaluate ongoing and post research
implications on participants and the community at
large
7
8. Specific objectives…
• To clear the way for legal consideration against
research projects undertaken prior to ethics approval
and unethical implementation of project
• To regulate sample /specimens transfer
• To monitor and evaluate ethical implementation of
projects
8
9. Specific objectives…
• To ensure the scientific and ethical standards of
research projects.
– A research project that is not scientifically
(methodologically) sound is not ethically sound
• To ensure justice to research participants (their
rights are not breached, they themselves or the
society is benefiting)
9
10. • All the above objectives boil to the three basic
ethics principles:
1. Respect for persons/autonomy
2. Beneficence (principle of none-maleficience)
3. Justice.
10
11. I. Respect for persons
1. Autonomy
• Protecting multiple and interdependent interests of
the person (bodily, psychological/emotional, and
cultural integrity)
►The investigator should respect each participant
as a person capable of making an informed
decision regarding participation in research study
11
12. 2. Informed consent
• The importance of informed consent in research is
unquestionable & should be analyzed in terms of
three basic elements:
Information
Comprehension and
Voluntarism
12
13. • The information shall be given in writing and signed by the
participant
• If the informed consent is that of a third partly, the reason
for the indirect approach shall be stated in the proposal
• To give informed consent, participants should get adequate
information:
What the study entails to the individual
It should be expressed in a language that is
understandable to the participant
13
14. • The consent information (under participant information sheet and a consent form)
should indicate the following and written/translated to appropriate local language
addressing the participants:
a. Participant information sheet:
A short introduction
Title of the research/study/project
Purpose/ aim of the research
Procedures on the participant & its duration
Foreseeable risks /discomforts and expected benefits to participants & or
community at large. Includes compensation to possible injury/expenses claimed
by the participant
Confidentiality of information provided
Rights of the participant
Full address of the PI and the appropriate ethics monitoring body
14
15. b. Consent form:
Then declaration of voluntary consent that states in the participants
own terms that he/she is given full information about the research
and the right to withdraw.
This will only be certain if the participant is voluntary to sign.
• Consent form should clearly indicate that the participants are free
to withdraw
• Participants are not also obliged to respond to all questions in the
study Eg. Sensitive questions
15
16. 3. Confidentiality
• Researcher shall assure that information that has
been obtained in the course of investigation
remains confidential to protect participants from
possible harm at revelation of such information.
• The privacy of a participant needs to be kept
throughout the investigation
16
17. II. Beneficence
• Persons are treated in an ethical manner not only
by respecting their decisions & protecting them
from harm, but also by making efforts to secure
their well being
• Such treatment falls under the principle of
beneficence and none maleficience
17
18. • Beneficence is often understood to cover acts of
kindness or charity that go beyond strict obligation
• Two general rules have been formulated as
complementary expressions of beneficent & none
maleficient actions:
Do no harm
Maximize possible benefits & minimize possible
harms (90/ 10)
• Risk in research participant may extend from physical
to psychological harm.
18
19. • IRB makes sure that the risks are at possible minimal level
& benefits from the study outweigh the risks
• Individuals participating in health research are benefactor
of society
• They take risks for the gain of information which may
solve the problems of society at large
• Thus it is necessary to give these participants their due
respect
19
20. III. Justice
It is about:
Who ought to receive the
benefits of research
Fairness in distribution of
benefits & burdens of research
• Demands equitable selection of participants
20
21. • Protecting vulnerable groups (prisoners, children,
pregnant woman, immuno - compromised…)
• Injustice arises when selecting participants only
from a specific socio-economic class, age, sex,
racial, cultural & institutional make-up
• When a research is absolutely necessary
appropriate justification should be put in place
with beneficial predicted outcome
21
23. Research ethics in Ethiopia
In 1995, Ethiopia developed National Health Research Ethics
Review Guidelines
key objectives of the guidelines:
• To develop capacity of researchers in health research ethics
• To serve as a guide for the various ERC (institutional,
regional and national)
►However, there are challenges in applying the guidelines
23
24. Role of ERCs in promoting local ethical standards
• Safeguarding the right, dignity & welfare of study subjects
• Verifying scientific & ethical soundness of protocols
• Fostering research that is of benefit to the community
• Proving adequacy of qualification of investigators
• Ensuring availability of standard laboratories
• Validating how samples are collected, transferred & stored
• Demanding of consent for stored human samples
24
25. What the IRC requests
• Well reviewed and written proposal (following standard
guideline); a scientifically organized document addressing
the following major contents:
• Cover title
• Aknowledgment
• Table of contents, tables and figures (as appropriate)
• Acronyms and abbreviations
• Abstract/summary
25
26. • Introduction (with the following sub-topics)
– Background (general information towards the issue to be studied:
general to particular)
– Problem statement (Why the research is important, what is the
gap, what is new to be investigated: clear justification/ rationale of
the need for this study…)
– Significance: Who can ultimately use findings of this study and
how?
– Objectives: General and specifics
• Literature review: Pertinent information from peer
reviewed journal articles organized under pertinent sub-
titles showing methods used and findings by other
researchers and finally formulating a conceptual
framework. 26
27. • Methodology (clear and detailed)
Study area and study period
Study design
Source population
Study population
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Sample size determination and sampling technique
Data collection methods
Variables (dependent and independent)
Operational definitions
Data quality control
27
28. Method of data analysis (software to be used and
statistical analysis methods and data presentation
methods)
Ethical considerations
Methods of dissemination of information
Expected limitations
Work plan (detail using Gantt chart)
Budget breakdown (detail and summary)
List of references (following standard/recommended
guidelines
28
29. Participant information sheet and informed consent
form (with translation to pertinent local languages)
The data collection instrument/tool (with translation to
pertinent local languages)
Other annexes (as found necessary)
Curriculum vitae of the PI
29
30. Other things the PI has to be aware of:
•Advisor approval signatures
•Proper understanding of the National Ethics Guidelines and
Bio-ethics guide
30
31. Other pertinent information
• Studies regarding HIV/AIDS except KAP studies and
studies on vulnerable population groups shall be approved
by National Health Research Review Committee after
passing Institutional approval.
• No research should be advanced on issues involving human
subjects without certificates from IRBs (or IRERCs.)
• Ethical committees should be free from external pressures.
• Ethical committees are expected to make follow-up
research progress.
31
32. • Change of protocols in part or full should be verified by the
IRBs (IRERCs) before implementation
• Copies of final reports should be submitted to the IRBs
(IRERCs)
• The act of proper referencing (citations) and Acknowledging
(plagiarism)
• Consent should be obtained (as applicable) for personal/client
records in health institutions even for secondary data or
waiver requests should be asked from the appropriate ethical
review committees.
32