1074-session-5workshop-4pimme.pdf

Application of
Harmonized Gender
and Development
Guidelines (HGDG)
PIMME Checklist
Seminar Workshop on the Utilization of Gender Analysis Tools
August 25-27, 2015
Icon Hotel, Quezon City

Grp
No.
Name of Project Document/Case Sector Specific
Checklist
1 Construction of RHU and Lying Inn Building PIMME
2 Repair/Rehabilitation of Barangay Road PIMME
3 Construction of RHU and Lying Inn Building PIMME
4 Repair/Rehabilitation of Barangay Road PIMME

1. Construction of RHU and
Lying Inn Building
Assessed using the PIMME Checklist

Element and Guide Question
(col. 1)
Response (col. 2)
Score of the item or element
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes
(2b)
Yes
(2c)
1.0 Supportive project
management (max score: 2; for
each item, 1.0)
1.5
1.1 Is the project leadership
(project steering/advisory
committee or management)
supportive of GAD or gender
equality goals? For instance, has it
mobilized adequate resources to
support strategies that address
gender issues or constraints to
women’s and men’s participation
during project implementation?
(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
/ The project leadership clearly
addressed health demand of the
city by having an establishing an
accessible facility specifically
catering to the needs of pregnant
women.
BOX 16

(col. 1)
Response (col. 2)
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes
(2b)
Yes
(2c)
1.2 Has adequate gender expertise
has been made available throughout
the project? For example, are
gender issues adequately addressed
in the project management contract
and scope of services? (possible
scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
/ No mentioned of gender expertise
but gender issues of pregnant
women has been identified.
1.2 Has adequate gender expertise
has been made available throughout
the project? For example, are
gender issues adequately addressed
in the project management contract
and scope of services? (possible
scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
/ No mentioned of gender expertise
but gender issues of pregnant
women has been identified.

(col. 1)
Response (col. 2)
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes
(2b)
Yes
(2c)
2.0 Technically competent staff or
consultants (max score: 2; for each
item, 0.67)
0
2.1 Are the project staff members
technically prepared to promote
gender equality or integrate GAD in
their respective positions/locations?
OR, is there an individual or group
responsible for promoting gender
equality in the project? OR, has the
project tapped local gender experts to
assist its staff/partners in integrating
gender equality in their activities or in
project operations? (possible scores:
0, 0.33, 0.67)
/ Not cited in the document
2.2 Does the project require the
presence of women and men in the
project implementation team?

(col. 1)
Response (col. 2)
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes
(2b)
Yes
(2c)
3.0 Committed Philippine
government agency (max score: 2;
for each item, 1)
0
3.1 Are regular agency personnel
involved in implementing project
GAD initiatives? OR, are agency
officials or personnel participating
in GAD training sponsored by the
project? (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
3.2 Has the agency included the
project’s GAD efforts in its GAD
plans? (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)

(col. 1)
Response (col. 2)
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes
(2b)
Yes
(2c)
4.0 GAD implementation
processes and procedures (max
score: 2; for each item, 0.5)
0.75
4.1 Do project implementation
documents incorporate a discussion
of GAD concerns? IF APPLICABLE:
Are subproject proposals required
to have explicit GAD objectives and
to have been supported by gender
analysis? (possible scores: 0, 0.25,
0.50)
/ Not explicitly stated but mentioned
the improvement and better health
facilities to maintain good health
and wellbeing of populace.
4.2 Does the project have an
operational GAD strategy?
Alternately, has the project been
effective in integrating GAD into the
development activity? (possible
scores: 0, 0.25, 0.50)
/ Not cited

(col. 1)
Response (col. 2)
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes
(2b)
Yes
(2c)
4.3 Does the project have a budget
for activities that will build
capacities for doing GAD tasks
(gender analysis, monitoring, etc.)
/ With budget allocation but does not
specifically mentioned if for GAD
activities
4.4 Does the project involve women
and men in various phases of
subprojects? (possible scores: 0,
0.25, 0.50)
/ Not cited but can be assumed since
LGU staff/personnel will benefit?
TOTAL GAD SCORE-PROJECT
MANAGEMENT
2.25

(col. 1)
Response (col. 2)
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes
(2b)
Yes
(2c)
1.0 Project monitoring system
being used by the project includes
indicators that measure gender
differences in outputs, results, and
outcomes (max score: 2; for each
item, 1)
0
1.1 Does the project require gender-
sensitive outputs and outcomes?
/
BOX 17

(col. 1)
Response (col. 2)
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes
(2b)
Yes
(2c)
2.0 Project database includes
sex-disaggregated and gender-
related information (max score:
2; for each item, 0.5)
0
2.1 Does the project support
studies to assess gender issues
and impacts? OR, have sex-
disaggregated data been collected
on the project’s impact on women
and men in connection with
welfare, access to resources and
benefits, awareness or
consciousness raising,
participation, and control?
/ Mentioned of the 2010 Census of 101,
571 people with growth rate of 2.826
and population density of 7.68
person(2020) but not SDD.

(col. 1)
Response (col. 2)
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes
(2b)
Yes
(2c)
2.2 Have sex-disaggregated data
been collected on the distribution of
project resources to women and
men, and on the participation of
women and men in project activities
and in decision-making? IF
APPLICABLE: Does the project
require its subprojects to include
sex-disaggregated data in their
reports? (possible scores: 0, 0.25,
0.50)
/ Census data is not SDD which are the
target beneficiaries of the program.
2.3 Do project and subproject
reports include sex-disaggregated
data or cover gender equality or
GAD concerns, initiatives, and
results (that is, information on
gender issues and how these are
addressed)? (possible score: 0, 0.25,
0.50)
/ None mentioned in the document

(col. 1)
Response (col. 2)
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes
(2b)
Yes
(2c)
2.4 Does the project require its
monitoring and evaluation team
(personnel or consultants) to have
technical competence for GAD
evaluation? (possible scores: 0,
0.33, 0.67)
2.5 Are sex-disaggregated data
being “rolled up” from the field to
the national level? (possible
scores: 0, 0.25, 0.50)

(col. 1)
Response (col. 2)
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes
(2b)
Yes
(2c)
3.0 Gender equality and women’s
empowerment targets are being
met (max score: 4)
1.0
3.1 Has women’s welfare and status
been improved as a result of the
/ Reflected only 2 interviews of women
highlighting the additional employment
opportunities to health professionals
and access to free medical services and
medicines of indigent residents.
Example of indicators:
• The project has helped in raising the education levels and health status of disadvantaged groups of
women
• Women’s access to productive resources, employment opportunities, and political and legal status
has improved
• The project has created new opportunities or roles for women and men
• Men and women have been sensitized to gender issues and women’s human rights
• The project has supported or instituted strategies to overcome any adverse effects on women
• The project has introduced follow-up activities to promote the sustainability of its gender equality
results
• There are project initiatives to ensure that improvements in the status of women and girls will be
sustained and supported after project completion

(col. 1)
Response (col. 2)
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes
(2b)
Yes
(2c)
3.2 Has the project helped in
developing the capacity of the
implementing agency for
implementing gender-sensitive
projects? (possible scores: 0, 1.0,
2.0)

(col. 1)
Response (col. 2)
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes
(2b)
Yes
(2c)
4.0 Project addresses gender
issues arising from or during its
implementation (possible
scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
Has the project responded to
gender issues that were identified
during project implementation or
No gender issues mentioned in
the document M&E? OR: Has the
project addressed gender issues
arising from its implementation?
/ Only mentioned material loss due to
burglary and theft and establishment
of floor elevation.
Examples of gender issues:
• Negative effects on the gender relationship as a result of new roles or resources created for
women
• Additional workloads for women and men
• Displacement of women by men
• Loss of access to resources because of project rules

(col. 1)
Response (col. 2)
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes
(2b)
Yes
(2c)
5.0 Participatory monitoring
and evaluation processes (max
score: 2; for each item, 1)
0
5.1 Does the project involve or
consult women and men
implementers during project
monitoring and evaluation? Does
it involve women and
beneficiaries? (possible scores: 0,
0.5, 1.0)
/ Mentioned interview
5.2 Have women and men been
involved in or consulted on the
assessment of the gender impacts
of the Project? (possible scores: 0,
0.5, 1.0)
/ Mentioned interview with recipient
TOTAL GAD SCORE-MONITORING AND EVALUATION 2.25
TOTAL GAD SCORE-PROJECT MANAGEMENT (from box
16)
1
TOTAL GAD SCORE-PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 3.25 (GAD is invisible)

2. Repair/Rehabilitation
of Barangay Road
Assessed using the PIMME Checklist

(col. 1)
Response (col. 2) Score of the item or
element
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes (2b)
Yes
(2c)
1.0 Supportive project management
(max score: 2; for each item, 1.0)
0.5
1.1 Is the project leadership (project
steering/advisory committee or
management) supportive of GAD or
gender equality goals? For instance, has
it mobilized adequate resources to
support strategies that address gender
issues or constraints to women’s and
men’s participation during project
implementation? (possible scores: 0,
0.5, 1.0)
/ Project leaders addressed
the long term clamor of the
public for wider, thicker and
more durable roads
however, no clear indication
to address gender issues.
1.2 Has adequate gender expertise has
been made available throughout the
project? For example, are gender issues
adequately addressed in the project
management contract and scope of
services? (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
/ None mentioned in the
document.
BOX 16

(col. 1)
element
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes (2b)
Yes
(2c)
2.0 Technically competent staff or
consultants (max score: 2; for each
item, 0.67)
0.33
2.1 Are the project staff members
technically prepared to promote gender
equality or integrate GAD in their
respective positions/locations? OR, is
there an individual or group
responsible for promoting gender
equality in the project? OR, has the
project tapped local gender experts to
assist its staff/partners in integrating
gender equality in their activities or in
project operations? (possible scores: 0,
0.33, 0.67)
/ None cited in the document.

(col. 1)
element
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes (2b)
Yes
(2c)
2.2 Does the project require the
presence of women and men in the
project implementation team?
/ None cited
evaluation? (possible scores: 0, 0.33,
0.67)
/ Only timely monitoring and
evaluation of the project
and environmental hazard

(col. 1)
element
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes (2b)
Yes
(2c)
3.0 Committed Philippine
government agency (max score: 2; for
each item, 1)
0
3.1 Are regular agency personnel
involved in implementing project GAD
initiatives? OR, are agency officials or
personnel participating in GAD training
sponsored by the project? (possible
scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
document
3.2 Has the agency included the
project’s GAD efforts in its GAD plans?
document

(col. 1)
element
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes (2b)
Yes
(2c)
4.0 GAD implementation processes
and procedures (max score: 2; for
each item, 0.5)
0.25
4.1 Do project implementation
documents incorporate a discussion of
GAD concerns? IF APPLICABLE: Are
subproject proposals required to have
explicit GAD objectives and to have
been supported by gender analysis?
/ None cited in the document
4.2 Does the project have an
operational GAD strategy? Alternately,
has the project been effective in
integrating GAD into the development
activity? (possible scores: 0, 0.25, 0.50)

(col. 1)
element
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes (2b)
Yes
(2c)
4.3 Does the project have a budget for
activities that will build capacities for
doing GAD tasks (gender analysis,
monitoring, etc.) (possible scores: 0,
0.25, 0.50)
/ With budget allocation but
no clear indication for GAD
efforts.
4.4 Does the project involve women
and men in various phases of
subprojects? (possible scores: 0, 0.25,
0.50)
TOTAL GAD SCORE-PROJECT
MANAGEMENT
0.58

(col. 1)
element
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes (2b)
Yes
(2c)
1.0 Project monitoring system being
used by the project includes
indicators that measure gender
differences in outputs, results, and
outcomes (max score: 2; for each
item, 1)
0
1.1 Does the project require gender-
sensitive outputs and outcomes?
/ None mentioned
BOX 17

(col. 1)
element
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes (2b)
Yes
(2c)
2.0 Project database includes sex-
disaggregated and gender-related
information (max score: 2; for each
item, 0.5)
0.58
2.1 Does the project support studies to
assess gender issues and impacts? OR,
have sex-disaggregated data been
collected on the project’s impact on
women and men in connection with
welfare, access to resources and
benefits, awareness or consciousness
raising, participation, and control?
/ NSO statistics in 2010 with
119, 252 population of
Danao but not SDD

(col. 1)
element
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes (2b)
Yes
(2c)
2.2 Have sex-disaggregated data been
collected on the distribution of project
resources to women and men, and on
the participation of women and men in
project activities and in decision-
making? IF APPLICABLE: Does the
project require its subprojects to
include sex-disaggregated data in their
reports? (possible scores: 0, 0.25, 0.50)
/ None mentioned
2.3 Do project and subproject reports
include sex-disaggregated data or cover
gender equality or GAD concerns,
initiatives, and results (that is,
information on gender issues and how
these are addressed)? (possible score:
0, 0.25, 0.50)
/ None mentioned

(col. 1)
element
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes (2b)
Yes
(2c)
evaluation? (possible scores: 0, 0.33,
0.67)
/ Monitoring only of
environmental hazard and
project development but no
indication for GAD
2.5 Are sex-disaggregated data being
“rolled up” from the field to the
national level? (possible scores: 0, 0.25,
0.50)
/ None mentioned

(col. 1)
element
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes (2b)
Yes
(2c)
3.0 Gender equality and women’s
empowerment targets are being met
(max score: 4)
0
3.1 Has women’s welfare and status
been improved as a result of the
document
Example of indicators:
• The project has helped in raising the education levels and health status of disadvantaged
groups of women
• Women’s access to productive resources, employment opportunities, and political and legal
status has improved
• The project has created new opportunities or roles for women and men
• Men and women have been sensitized to gender issues and women’s human rights
• The project has supported or instituted strategies to overcome any adverse effects on women
• The project has introduced follow-up activities to promote the sustainability of its gender
equality results
• There are project initiatives to ensure that improvements in the status of women and girls
will be sustained and supported after project completion

(col. 1)
element
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes (2b)
Yes
(2c)
3.2 Has the project helped in
developing the capacity of the
implementing agency for implementing
gender-sensitive projects? (possible
scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
/ None mentioned

(col. 1)
element
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes (2b)
Yes
(2c)
4.0 Project addresses gender issues
arising from or during its
implementation (possible scores: 0,
1.0, 2.0)
Has the project responded to gender
issues that were identified during
project implementation or No gender
issues mentioned in the
documentM&E? OR: Has the project
addressed gender issues arising from
its implementation?
/ 0
Examples of gender issues:
• Negative effects on the gender relationship as a result of new roles or resources created for
women
• Additional workloads for women and men
• Displacement of women by men
• Loss of access to resources because of project rules

(col. 1)
element
(col. 3)
No
(2a)
Partly
yes (2b)
Yes
(2c)
5.0 Participatory monitoring and
evaluation processes (max score: 2;
for each item, 1)
1.0
5.1 Does the project involve or consult
women and men implementers during
project monitoring and evaluation?
Does it involve women and
beneficiaries? (possible scores: 0, 0.5,
1.0)
/ Monitoring will be done by
Brgy. Officials and residents
together with CSOs
5.2 Have women and men been
involved in or consulted on the
assessment of the gender impacts of
the Project? (possible scores: 0, 0.5,
1.0)
/ Mentioned in the interview
undertaken but no
indication of the gender
impacts of the project
TOTAL GAD SCORE-MONITORING AND EVALUATION 1.58
TOTAL GAD SCORE-PROJECT MANAGEMENT (from box 16) 0.58
TOTAL GAD SCORE-PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 2.26 (GAD is invisible)

1074-session-5workshop-4pimme.pdf

More Related Content

Similar to 1074-session-5workshop-4pimme.pdf (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

1074-session-5workshop-4pimme.pdf