182571950 im20-doc

Get Homework/Assignment Done
Homeworkping.com
Homework Help
https://www.homeworkping.com/
Research Paper help
Online Tutoring
click here for freelancing tutoring sites
Chapter 20
Working Capital Management
20-1 The CCC is defined as the number of days between a company’s paying for
some product or service that it sells and the receipt of cash from the
sale of the product or service.
Other things held constant, it is better to have a shorter than a
longer CCC, because the lower the CCC, the less the firm’s investment
in working capital. With less working capital, total capital
requirement decline, causing the dollar cost of capital to decline.
This increases net income and the value of the firm.
As shown in the BOC model, the illustrative company’s inventory
conversion period is 28 days, its receivables collection period (or
DSO) is 20 days, and its payables deferral period is 28 days, resulting
in a CCC of 20 days.
The company has a $380 million cost of goods sold, or $380/360 =
$1.0556 per day. With a 20 day CCC, its average investment in working
capital is 20($1.0556) = $21.11 million. With a 10% cost of capital,
the cost of carrying working capital is $2.11 million.
If the CCC could be reduced by 5 days, to 15 days, the average
working capital balance would be 15($1.0556) = $15.83 million, with a
carrying cost of $1.58 million. Thus, the savings would be $2.11
million - $1.58 million = $530,000.
The kinds of actions that companies take to shorten their CCC’s
include speeding up the manufacturing process, offering discounts or
Answers and Solutions: 20 - 1
ANSWERS TO BEGINNING-OF-CHAPTER QUESTIONS

tightening credit terms and standards to speed up collections, and
negotiating better credit terms or paying from remote locations to
defer payments. Of course, the costs of taking such actions must be
balanced against the benefits of the lower CCC.
20-2 A cash budget is a forecast of inflows and outflows of cash, generally
on a monthly or daily basis. The primary purpose of the cash budget is
to forecast when loans will be needed and/or when surplus funds that
can be invested will be on hand. A cash budget is also very useful
when negotiating bank loans.
The BOC model provides a detailed example of a monthly cash budget.
It shows that, other things held constant, shortening the CCC will
cause cash to come in faster, thus increasing investable funds and/or
reducing borrowing requirements.
A change in credit policy will have several effects on the cash
budget. A tightening will probably lower the sales forecast, which
will reduce both collections and payments for purchases, and possibly
also taxes payable. Tightening should also alter the percentages of
sales collected during each month, increasing the percentages for the
first and second months and reducing the percentage for the third
month. Those changes would probably lower the need for loans.
However, a lot depends on the profitability of sales, and if a
tightening reduced sales substantially, this might lower profits and
adversely affect cash flow. Our conclusion is that one should not jump
to quick conclusions about how a credit policy change will affect
operations. Rather, a thorough analysis is required.
Note also that a change in credit policy would affect the CCC. A
tightning would lead to faster payments, which would shorten the CCC,
and an easing would have the opposite effect.
20-3 Free trade credit is the credit one gets during the discount period,
i.e., credit one receives while still being able to take discounts.
For example, if you buy $100 of goods under terms of 2/10, net 30, you
only have to pay $98 if you pay by the 10th
day, so you get $98 of free
credit for 10 days. After day 10, you can get an additional 20 days of
credit, but at a cost of the $2 discount you must give up. See the
model for numerical examples of the nominal and effective cost rates
for different sets of credit terms and actual payments. There we show
that stretching payments lowers the effective cost of trade credit.
However, stretching payments gives one a reputation for being a slow
payer, and that can have a substantial though not quantifiable cost.
20-4 Matching maturities causes the cash flows from an asset to be
synchronized with the cash costs required on the capital used to
finance the assets. If the firm were financed only with debt, and if
the debt was amortized, then the matching would be quite close.
However, firms use both debt and equity, and the equity has no stated
maturity. Similarly, assets have varying lives, and those lives cannot
always be determined at the time the asset is being financed.. For
example, if a firm spends money on advertising to build its reputation
as a reliable supplier of high quality products, and if the advertising
is effective, then “good will” is created. Good will is clearly an
intangible asset, regardless of whether or not accountants show it on
the balance sheet, and money must be raised and spent to create the

goodwill. But what is the life of that asset, hence how can one
finance it with a matching maturity claim?
Our conclusion is that it makes sense to consider the matching
maturity concept, and to avoid financing a building with a 30 year life
with a 30 day loan. However, it would be difficult, in general, to
match all asset and claim maturities perfectly.
Firms can also deliberately mismatch maturities if they think that
capital costs are likely to rise or fall sharply in the near future.
For example, if interest rates are currently quite high and stock
prices low, then a firm might finance long term assets additions with
short term debt on the theory that it could later refinance the short
term debt with long term debt once rates fall.
20-5 An aggressive financing policy generally refers to a deliberate mis-
matching of asset and claims maturities. The yield curve is normally
upward sloping, so short-term rates are normally lower than long-term
rates. Thus, firms can normally minimize current interest payments by
using primarily short-term debt. However, this can be a big mistake if
interest rates rise, in which case the firm would have been better off
locking in long-term rates before they rose.
Also, it is aggressive to use lots of debt and relatively little
equity in financing. Debt normally costs less than equity, but equity
financing is safer from the firm’s standpoint.
Entrenched, oligolopistic firms can generally finance with whatever
type of capital their managements choose, and managements often choose
to follow a conservative financing policy so they won’t have to worry
as much as they would under an aggressive policy. Firms in highly
competitive industries are often under pressure, and during hard times
capital suppliers are more willing to lend money (secured, with tough
terms) than to buy the stock of a shaky company. Also, profit margins
of firms in highly competitive industries may pressure companies to
hold down all costs, including capital costs, even to the point where
their financing policies put the firm at risk.
5.5.
20-1 a. Working capital is a firm’s investment in short-term assets--cash,
ANSWERS TO END-OF-CHAPTER QUESTIONS

marketable securities, inventory, and accounts receivable. Net
working capital is current assets minus current liabilities. Net
operating working capital is operating current assets minus
operating current liabilities.
b. The inventory conversion period is the average length of time to
convert materials into finished goods and then to sell them. It is
calculated by dividing total inventory by sales per day. The
receivables collection period is the average length of time required
to convert a firm’s receivables into cash. It is calculated by
dividing accounts receivable by sales per day. The cash conversion
cycle is the length of time between the firm's actual cash
expenditures on productive resources (materials and labor) and its
own cash receipts from the sale of products (that is, the length of
time between paying for labor and materials and collecting on
receivables.) Thus, the cash conversion cycle equals the length of
time the firm has funds tied up in current assets. The payables
deferral period is the average length of time between a firm’s
purchase of materials and labor and the payment of cash for them.
It is calculated by dividing accounts payable by credit purchases
per day (COGS/365).
c. A relaxed NOWC policy refers to a policy under which relatively
large amounts of cash, marketable securities, and inventories are
carried and under which sales are stimulated by a liberal credit
policy, resulting in a high level of receivables.
A restricted NOWC policy refers to a policy under which holdings
of cash, securities, inventories, and receivables are minimized;
while a moderate current asset investment policy lies between the
relaxed and restricted policies.
A moderate NOWC policy matches asset and liability maturities.
It is also referred to as the maturity matching, or “self-
liquidating” approach.
d. Transactions balance is the cash balance associated with payments
and collections; the balance necessary for day-to-day operations. A
compensating balance is a checking account balance that a firm must
maintain with a bank to compensate the bank for services rendered or
for granting a loan. A precautionary balance is a cash balance held
in reserve for random, unforeseen fluctuations in cash inflows and
outflows.
e. A cash budget is a schedule showing cash flows (receipts,
disbursements, and cash balances) for a firm over a specified
period. The net cash gain or loss for the period is calculated as
total collections for the period less total payments for the same
period of time.
The target cash balance is the desired cash balance that a firm
plans to maintain in order to conduct business.

f. Trade discounts are price reductions that suppliers offer customers
for early payment of bills.
g. An account receivable is created when a good is shipped or a service
is performed, and payment for that good is not made on a cash basis,
but on a credit basis.
Days sales outstanding (DSO) is a measure of the average length
of time it takes a firm’s customers to pay off their credit
purchases.
An aging schedule breaks down accounts receivable according to
how long they have been outstanding. This gives the firm a more
complete picture of the structure of accounts receivable than that
provided by days sales outstanding.
h. Credit policy is nothing more than the firm’s policy on granting and
collecting credit. There are four elements of credit policy, or
credit policy variables. These are credit period, credit standards,
collection policy, and discounts.
The credit period is the length of time for which credit is
extended. If the credit period is lengthened, sales will generally
increase, as will accounts receivable. This will increase the
financing needs and possibly increase bad debt losses. A shortening
of the credit period will have the opposite effect.
Credit standards determine the minimum financial strength
required to become a credit, versus cash, customer. The optimal
credit standards equate the incremental costs of credit to the
incremental profits on increased sales.
The collection policy is the procedure for collecting accounts
receivable. A change in collection policy will affect sales, days
sales outstanding, bad debt losses, and the percentage of customers
taking discounts.
Credit terms are statements of the credit period and any
discounts offered--for example, 2/10, net 30.
Cash discounts are often used to encourage early payment and to
attract customers by effectively lowering prices. Credit terms are
usually stated in the following form: 2/10, net 30. This means a 2
percent discount will apply if the account is paid within 10 days,
otherwise the account must be paid within 30 days.
i. Permanent NOWC is the NOWC required when the economy is weak and
seasonal sales are at their low point. Thus, this level of NOWC
always requires financing and can be regarded as permanent.
Temporary NOWC is the NOWC required above the permanent level when
the economy is strong and/or seasonal sales are high.
j. A moderate short-term financing policy matches asset and liability
maturities. It is also referred to as the maturity matching, or
"self-liquidating" approach. When a firm finances all of its fixed
assets with long-term capital but part of its permanent current
assets with short-term, nonspontaneous credit this is referred to as
an aggressive short-term financing policy. With a conservative

short-term financing policy permanent capital is used to finance all
permanent asset requirements, as well as to meet some or all of the
seasonal demands.
k. A financing policy that matches asset and liability maturities.
This is a moderate policy.
l. Continually recurring short-term liabilities, especially accrued
wages and accrued taxes.
m. Trade credit is debt arising from credit sales and recorded as an
account receivable by the seller and as an account payable by the
buyer. Stretching accounts payable is the practice of deliberately
paying accounts payable late. Free trade credit is credit received
during the discount period. Credit taken in excess of free trade
credit, whose cost is equal to the discount lost is termed costly
trade credit.
n. A promissory note is a document specifying the terms and conditions
of a loan, including the amount, interest rate, and repayment
schedule. A line of credit is an arrangement in which a bank agrees
to lend up to a specified maximum amount of funds during a
designated period. A revolving credit agreement is a formal,
committed line of credit extended by a bank or other lending
institution.
o. Commercial paper is unsecured, short-term promissory notes of large
firms, usually issued in denominations of $100,000 or more and
having an interest rate somewhat below the prime rate. A secured
loan is backed by collateral, often inventories or receivables.
20-2 The two principal reasons for holding cash are for transactions and
compensating balances. The target cash balance is not equal to the sum
of the holdings for each reason because the same money can often
partially satisfy both motives.
20-3 False. Both accounts will record the same transaction amount.
20-4 The four elements in a firm’s credit policy are (1) credit standards,
(2) credit period, (3) discount policy, and (4) collection policy. The
firm is not required to accept the credit policies employed by its
competition, but the optimal credit policy cannot be determined without
considering competitors’ credit policies. A firm’s credit policy has
an important influence on its volume of sales, and thus on its
profitability.
20-5 If an asset’s life and returns can be positively determined, the
maturity of the asset can be matched to the maturity of the liability
incurred to finance the asset. This matching will ensure that funds
are borrowed only for the time they are required to finance the asset
and that adequate funds will have been generated by the asset by the
time the financing must be repaid.

A basic fallacy is involved in the above discussion, however.
Borrowing to finance receivables or inventories may be on a short-term
basis because these turn over 8 to 12 times a year. But as a firm’s
sales grow, its investment in receivables and inventories grow, even
though they turn over. Hence, longer-term financing should be used to
finance the permanent components of receivables and inventory
investments.
20-6 From the standpoint of the borrower, short-term credit is riskier
because short-term interest rates fluctuate more than long-term rates,
and the firm may be unable to repay the debt. If the lender will not
extend the loan, the firm could be forced into bankruptcy.
A firm might borrow short-term if it thought that interest rates
were going to fall and, therefore, that the long-term rate would go
even lower. A firm might also borrow short-term if it were only going
to need the money for a short while and the higher interest would be
offset by lower administration costs and no prepayment penalty. Thus,
firms do consider factors other than interest rates when deciding on
the maturity of their debt.
20-7 This statement is false. A firm cannot ordinarily control its accruals
since payrolls and the timing of wage payments are set by economic
forces and by industry custom, while tax payment dates are established
by law.
20-8 Yes. If a firm is able to buy on credit at all, if the credit terms
include a discount for early payment, and if the firm pays during the
discount period, it has obtained “free” trade credit. However, taking
additional trade credit by paying after the discount period can be
quite costly.
20-9 Commercial paper refers to promissory notes of large, strong
corporations. These notes have maturities that generally vary from one
day to 9 months, and the return is usually 1½ to 3½ percentage points
below the prime lending rate. Mama and Pappa Gus could not use the
commercial paper market.

SOLUTIONS TO END-OF-CHAPTER PROBLEMS
20-1 Sales = $10,000,000; S/I = 2×.
Inventory = S/2
=
2
000,000,10$
= $5,000,000.
If S/I = 5×, how much cash is freed up?
Inventory = S/5
=
5
000,000,10$
= $2,000,000.
Cash Freed = $5,000,000 - $2,000,000 = $3,000,000.
20-2 DSO = 17; Credit Sales/Day = $3,500; A/R = ?
DSO =
S/365
A/R
17 =
$3,500
A/R
A/R = 17 × $3,500 = $59,500.
20-3 Nominal cost of trade credit =
15-30
536
97
3
×
= 0.0309 × 24.33 = 0.7526 = 75.26%.
Effective cost of trade credit = (1.0309)24.33
- 1.0 = 1.0984 = 109.84%.
20-4 Effective cost of trade credit = (1 + 1/99)8.11
- 1.0
= 0.0849 = 8.49%.
20-5 Net purchase price of inventory = $500,000/day.
Credit terms = 2/15, net 40.
$500,000 × 15 = $7,500,000.
20-6 a. 0.4(10) + 0.6(40) = 28 days.

b. $912,500/365 = $2,500 sales per day.
$2,500(28) = $70,000 = Average receivables.
c. 0.4(10) + 0.6(30) = 22 days. $912,500/365 = $2,500 sales per day.
$2,500(22) = $55,000 = Average receivables.
Sales may also decline as a result of the tighter credit. This
would further reduce receivables. Also, some customers may now take
discounts further reducing receivables.
20-7 a.
5
536
99
1
× = 73.74%.
b.
50
536
98
2
× = 14.90%.
c.
35
536
97
3
× = 32.25%.
d.
35
536
98
2
× = 21.28%.
e.
25
536
98
2
× = 29.80%.
20-8 a.
20-45
536
97
3
× = 45.15%.
Because the firm still takes the discount on Day 20, 20 is used as
the discount period in calculating the cost of nonfree trade credit.
b. Paying after the discount period, but still taking the discount
gives the firm more credit than it would receive if it paid within
15 days.

20-9 Sales per day =
365
500,562,4$
= $12,500.
Discount sales = 0.5($12,500) = $6,250.
A/R attributable to discount customers = $6,250(10) = $62,500.
A/R attributable to nondiscount customers:
Total A/R $437,500
Discount customers’ A/R 62,500
Nondiscount customers’ A/R $375,000
days.60
250,6$
000,375$
dayperSales
A/R
customerstnondiscoun
goutstandinsalesDays
===
Alternatively,
DSO = $437,500/$12,500 = 35 days.
35 = 0.5(10) + 0.5(DSONondiscount)
DSONondiscount = 30/0.5 = 60 days.
Thus, although nondiscount customers are supposed to pay within 40
days, they are actually paying, on average, in 60 days.
Cost of trade credit to nondiscount customers equals the rate of
return to the firm:
Nominal rate =
10-60
536
98
2
× = 0.0204(7.3) = 14.90%.
Effective cost = (1 + 2/98)365/50
- 1 = 15.89%.
20-10 Accounts payable:
Nominal cost =
80
536
97
3












= (0.03093)(4.5625) = 14.11%.
EAR cost = (1.03093)4.5625
- 1.0 = 14.91%.
20-11 a.
cycle
conversion
Cash
=
period
deferral
Payables
period
collection
sReceivable
period
conversion
Inventory
−+
= 75 + 38 - 30 = 83 days.
b. Average sales per day = $3,421,875/365 = $9,375.
Investment in receivables = $9,375 × 38 = $356,250.
c. Inventory turnover = 365/75 = 4.87×.

20-12 a. Inventory conversion period = 365/Inventory turnover ratio
= 365/5 = 73 days.
Receivables collection period = DSO = 36.5 days.
cycle
conversion
Cash
=
period
deferral
Payables
period
collection
sReceivable
period
conversion
Inventory
−+
= 73 + 36.5 - 40 = 69.5 days.
b. Total assets = Inventory + Receivables + Fixed assets
= $150,000/5 + [($150,000/365) × 36.5] + $35,000
= $30,000 + $15,000 + $35,000 = $80,000.
Total assets turnover = Sales/Total assets
= $150,000/$80,000 = 1.875×.
ROA = Profit margin × Total assets turnover
= 0.06 × 1.875 = 0.1125 = 11.25%.
c. Inventory conversion period = 365/7.3 = 50 days.
Cash conversion cycle = 50 + 36.5 - 40 = 46.5 days.
Total assets = Inventory + Receivables + Fixed assets
= $150,000/7.3 + $15,000 + $35,000
= $20,548 + $15,000 + $35,000 = $70,548.
Total assets turnover = $150,000/$70,548 = 2.1262×.
ROA = $9,000/$70,548 = 12.76%.

20-13 a. Return on equity may be computed as follows:
Tight Moderate Relaxed
Current assets
(% of sales × Sales) $ 900,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000
Fixed assets 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000
Total assets $1,900,000 $2,000,000 $2,200,000
Debt (60% of assets) $1,140,000 $1,200,000 $1,320,000
Equity 760,000 800,000 880,000
Total liab./equity $1,900,000 $2,000,000 $2,200,000
EBIT (12% × $2 million) $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000
Interest (8%) 91,200 96,000 105,600
Earnings before taxes $ 148,800 $ 144,000 $ 134,400
Taxes (40%) 59,520 57,600 53,760
Net income $ 89,280 $ 86,400 $ 80,640
Return on equity 11.75% 10.80% 9.16%
b. No, this assumption would probably not be valid in a real world
situation. A firm’s current asset policies, particularly with
regard to accounts receivable, such as discounts, collection period,
and collection policy, may have a significant effect on sales. The
exact nature of this function may be difficult to quantify, however,
and determining an “optimal” current asset level may not be possible
in actuality.
c. As the answers to Part a indicate, the tighter policy leads to a
higher expected return. However, as the current asset level is
decreased, presumably some of this reduction comes from accounts
receivable. This can be accomplished only through higher discounts,
a shorter collection period, and/or tougher collection policies. As
outlined above, this would in turn have some effect on sales,
possibly lowering profits. More restrictive receivable policies
might involve some additional costs (collection, and so forth) but
would also probably reduce bad debt expenses. Lower current assets
would also imply lower liquid assets; thus, the firm’s ability to
handle contingencies would be impaired. Higher risk of inadequate
liquidity would increase the firm’s risk of insolvency and thus
increase its chance of failing to meet fixed charges. Also, lower
inventories might mean lost sales and/or expensive production
stoppages. Attempting to attach numerical values to these potential
losses and probabilities would be extremely difficult.

20-14 a. I. Collections and Purchases:
December January February
Sales $160,000 $40,000 $60,000
Purchases 40,000 40,000 40,000
Payments 140,000* 40,000 40,000
*November purchases = $140,000.
II. Gain or Loss for Month:
Receipts from sales $160,000 $40,000 $60,000
Payments for:
Purchases 140,000 40,000 40,000
Salaries 4,800 4,800 4,800
Rent 2,000 2,000 2,000
Taxes 12,000 --- ---
Total payments $158,800 $46,800 $46,800
Net cash gain (loss) $ 1,200 ($ 6,800) $13,200
III. Cash Surplus or Loan Requirements:
Cash at start of month 400 1,600 (5,200)
Cumulative cash $ 1,600 ($ 5,200) $ 8,000
Target cash balance 6,000 6,000 6,000
Cumulative surplus cash or
total loans to maintain
$6,000 target cash balance ($ 4,400) ($11,200) $ 2,000
b. If the company began selling on credit on December 1, then it would
have zero receipts during December, down from $160,000. Thus, it
would have to borrow an additional $160,000, so its loans
outstanding by December 31 would be $164,400. The loan requirements
would build gradually during the month. We could trace the effects
of the changed credit policy on out into January and February, but
here it would probably be best to simply construct a new cash budget.

20-15 a.
payable
accountsAverage
=
days365
000,650,3$
× 10 days = $10,000 × 10 = $100,000.
b. There is no cost of trade credit at this point. The firm is using
“free” trade credit.
c.
discount)of(net
payablesAverage
=
365
000,650,3$
× 30 = $10,000 × 30 = $300,000.
Nominal cost = (2/98)(365/20) = 37.24%,
or $74,490/($300,000 - $100,000) = 37.25%.
Effective cost = (1 + 2/98)365/20
- 1 = 0.4459 = 44.59%.
d. Nominal rate = %.8324.=
10-40
536
98
2
×
Effective cost = (1 + 2/98)365/30
- 1 = 0.2786 = 27.86%.
20-16 Trade Credit
Terms: 2/10, net 30. But the firm plans delaying payments 35
additional days, which is the equivalent of 2/10, net 65.
Nominal cost =
period
Discount
goutstandinis
creditDays
365
percent
Discount
-100
percentDiscount
−
×
= %5413.=)6364(6.0.0204=
55
536
98
2
=
10-65
536
2-100
2
×× .
Effective cost = (1 + 2/98)365/55
- 1 = 14.35%.

20-17 a. Size of bank loan = (Purchases/Day)(Days late)
= 




 −










30
goutstandin
payablesDays
goutstandin
payablesDays
Purchases
= ($600,000/60)(60 - 30) = $10,000(30) = $300,000.
Alternatively, one could simply recognize that accounts payable must
be cut to half of its existing level, because 30 days is half of 60
days.
b. Given the limited information, the decision must be based on the
rule-of-thumb comparisons, such as the following:
1. Debt ratio = ($1,500,000 + $700,000)/$3,000,000 = 73%.
Raattama’s debt ratio is 73 percent, as compared to a typical
debt ratio of 50 percent. The firm appears to be
undercapitalized.
2. Current ratio = $1,800,000/$1,500,000 = 1.20.
The current ratio appears to be low, but current assets could
cover current liabilities if all accounts receivable can be
collected and if the inventory can be liquidated at its book
value.
3. Quick ratio = $400,000/$1,500,000 = 0.27.
The quick ratio indicates that current assets, excluding
inventory, are only sufficient to cover 27 percent of current
liabilities, which is very bad.
The company appears to be carrying excess inventory and financing
extensively with debt. Bank borrowings are already high, and the
liquidity situation is poor. On the basis of these observations,
the loan should be denied, and the treasurer should be advised to
seek permanent capital, especially equity capital.

SPREADSHEET PROBLEM
20-18 The detailed solution for the spreadsheet problem is available both on
the instructor’s resource CD-ROM and on the instructor’s side of the
web site, http://brigham.swcollege.com.

MINI CASE
DAN BARNES, FINANCIAL MANAGER OF SKI EQUIPMENT INC. (SKI), IS
EXCITED, BUT APPREHENSIVE. THE COMPANY’S FOUNDER RECENTLY SOLD HIS
51 PERCENT CONTROLLING BLOCK OF STOCK TO KENT KOREN, WHO IS A BIG
FAN OF EVA (ECONOMIC VALUE ADDED). EVA IS FOUND BY TAKING THE
AFTER-TAX OPERATING PROFIT AND THEN SUBTRACTING THE DOLLAR COST OF
ALL THE CAPITAL THE FIRM USES:
EVA = NOPAT - CAPITAL COSTS
= EBIT (1 - T) - WACC(CAPITAL EMPLOYED).
IF EVA IS POSITIVE, THEN THE FIRM IS CREATING VALUE. ON THE
OTHER HAND, IF EVA IS NEGATIVE, THE FIRM IS NOT COVERING ITS COST OF
CAPITAL, AND STOCKHOLDERS’ VALUE IS BEING ERODED. KOREN REWARDS
MANAGERS HANDSOMELY IF THEY CREATE VALUE, BUT THOSE WHOSE OPERATIONS
PRODUCE NEGATIVE EVAs ARE SOON LOOKING FOR WORK. KOREN FREQUENTLY
POINTS OUT THAT IF A COMPANY CAN GENERATE ITS CURRENT LEVEL OF SALES
WITH LESS ASSETS, IT WOULD NEED LESS CAPITAL. THAT WOULD, OTHER
THINGS HELD CONSTANT, LOWER CAPITAL COSTS AND INCREASE ITS EVA.
SHORTLY AFTER HE TOOK CONTROL OF SKI, KENT KOREN MET WITH SKI’S
SENIOR EXECUTIVES TO TELL THEM OF HIS PLANS FOR THE COMPANY. FIRST,
HE PRESENTED SOME EVA DATA THAT CONVINCED EVERYONE THAT SKI HAD NOT
BEEN CREATING VALUE IN RECENT YEARS. HE THEN STATED, IN NO
UNCERTAIN TERMS, THAT THIS SITUATION MUST CHANGE. HE NOTED THAT
SKI’S DESIGNS OF SKIS, BOOTS, AND CLOTHING ARE ACCLAIMED THROUGHOUT
THE INDUSTRY, BUT SOMETHING IS SERIOUSLY AMISS ELSEWHERE IN THE
COMPANY. COSTS ARE TOO HIGH, PRICES ARE TOO LOW, OR THE COMPANY
EMPLOYS TOO MUCH CAPITAL, AND HE WANTS SKI’S MANAGERS TO CORRECT THE
PROBLEM OR ELSE.
BARNES HAS LONG FELT THAT SKI’S WORKING CAPITAL SITUATION SHOULD
BE STUDIED--THE COMPANY MAY HAVE THE OPTIMAL AMOUNTS OF CASH,
SECURITIES, RECEIVABLES, AND INVENTORIES, BUT IT MAY ALSO HAVE TOO
MUCH OR TOO LITTLE OF THESE ITEMS. IN THE PAST, THE PRODUCTION
MANAGER RESISTED BARNES’ EFFORTS TO QUESTION HIS HOLDINGS OF RAW
MATERIALS INVENTORIES, THE MARKETING MANAGER RESISTED QUESTIONS
Mini Case: 20 - 17

ABOUT FINISHED GOODS, THE SALES STAFF RESISTED QUESTIONS ABOUT
CREDIT POLICY (WHICH AFFECTS ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE), AND THE TREASURER
DID NOT WANT TO TALK ABOUT HER CASH AND SECURITIES BALANCES.
KOREN’S SPEECH MADE IT CLEAR THAT SUCH RESISTANCE WOULD NO LONGER BE
TOLERATED.
BARNES ALSO KNOWS THAT DECISIONS ABOUT WORKING CAPITAL CANNOT BE
MADE IN A VACUUM. FOR EXAMPLE, IF INVENTORIES COULD BE LOWERED
WITHOUT ADVERSELY AFFECTING OPERATIONS, THEN LESS CAPITAL WOULD BE
REQUIRED, THE DOLLAR COST OF CAPITAL WOULD DECLINE, AND EVA WOULD
INCREASE. HOWEVER, LOWER RAW MATERIALS INVENTORIES MIGHT LEAD TO
PRODUCTION SLOWDOWNS AND HIGHER COSTS, WHILE LOWER FINISHED GOODS
INVENTORIES MIGHT LEAD TO THE LOSS OF PROFITABLE SALES. SO, BEFORE
INVENTORIES ARE CHANGED, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO STUDY OPERATING AS
WELL AS FINANCIAL EFFECTS. THE SITUATION IS THE SAME WITH REGARD TO
CASH AND RECEIVABLES.
SKI INDUSTRY
CURRENT 1.75 2.25
QUICK 0.83 1.20
DEBT/ASSETS 58.76% 50.00%
TURNOVER OF CASH AND SECURITIES 16.67 22.22
DAYS SALES OUTSTANDING (365-day basis) 45.63 32.00
INVENTORY TURNOVER 4.82 7.00
FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER 11.35 12.00
TOTAL ASSETS TURNOVER 2.08 3.00
PROFIT MARGIN ON SALES 2.07% 3.50%
RETURN ON EQUITY (ROE) 10.45% 21.00%
PAYABLES DEFERRAL PERIOD 30.00 33.00
Mini Case: 20 - 18

A. BARNES PLANS TO USE THE RATIOS SHOWN BELOW AS THE STARTING POINT FOR
DISCUSSIONS WITH SKI’S OPERATING EXECUTIVES. HE WANTS EVERYONE TO
THINK ABOUT THE PROS AND CONS OF CHANGING EACH TYPE OF CURRENT ASSET
AND HOW CHANGES WOULD INTERACT TO AFFECT PROFITS AND EVA. BASED ON
THE TABLE IC20-1 DATA, DOES SKI SEEM TO BE FOLLOWING A RELAXED,
MODERATE, OR RESTRICTED WORKING CAPITAL POLICY?
ANSWER: A COMPANY WITH A RELAXED WORKING CAPITAL POLICY WOULD CARRY
RELATIVELY LARGE AMOUNTS OF CURRENT ASSETS IN RELATION TO SALES. IT
WOULD BE GUARDING AGAINST RUNNING OUT OF STOCK OR OF RUNNING SHORT
OF CASH, OR LOSING SALES BECAUSE OF A RESTRICTIVE CREDIT POLICY. WE
CAN SEE THAT SKI HAS RELATIVELY LOW CASH AND INVENTORY TURNOVER
RATIOS. FOR EXAMPLE, SALES/INVENTORIES = 4.82 VERSUS 7.0 FOR AN
AVERAGE FIRM IN ITS INDUSTRY. THUS, SKI IS CARRYING A LOT OF
INVENTORY PER DOLLAR OF SALES, WHICH WOULD MEET THE DEFINITION OF A
RELAXED POLICY. SIMILARLY, SKI’S DSO IS RELATIVELY HIGH. SINCE DSO
IS CALCULATED AS RECEIVABLES/SALES PER DAY, A HIGH DSO INDICATES A
LOT OF RECEIVABLES PER DOLLAR OF SALES. THUS, SKI SEEMS TO HAVE A
RELAXED WORKING CAPITAL POLICY, AND A LOT OF CURRENT ASSETS.
Mini Case: 20 - 19

B. HOW CAN ONE DISTINGUISH BETWEEN A RELAXED BUT RATIONAL WORKING
CAPITAL POLICY AND A SITUATION IN WHICH A FIRM SIMPLY HAS A LOT OF
CURRENT ASSETS BECAUSE IT IS INEFFICIENT? DOES SKI’S WORKING
CAPITAL POLICY SEEM APPROPRIATE?
ANSWER: SKI MAY CHOOSE TO HOLD LARGE AMOUNTS OF INVENTORY TO AVOID THE COSTS
OF “RUNNING SHORT,” AND TO CATER TO CUSTOMERS WHO EXPECT TO RECEIVE
THEIR EQUIPMENT IN A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME. SKI MAY ALSO CHOOSE TO
HOLD HIGH AMOUNTS OF RECEIVABLES TO MAINTAIN GOOD RELATIONSHIPS WITH
ITS CUSTOMERS. HOWEVER, IF SKI IS HOLDING LARGE STOCKS OF INVENTORY
AND RECEIVABLES TO BETTER SERVE CUSTOMERS, IT SHOULD BE ABLE TO
OFFSET THE COSTS OF CARRYING THAT WORKING CAPITAL WITH HIGH PRICES
OR HIGHER SALES, AND ITS ROE SHOULD BE NO LOWER THAN THAT OF FIRMS
WITH OTHER WORKING CAPITAL POLICIES.
IT IS CLEAR FROM THE DATA IN TABLE IC20-1 THAT SKI IS NOT AS
PROFITABLE AS THE AVERAGE FIRM IN ITS INDUSTRY. THIS SUGGESTS THAT
IT SIMPLY HAS EXCESSIVE WORKING CAPITAL, AND THAT IT SHOULD TAKE
STEPS TO REDUCE ITS WORKING CAPITAL.
Mini Case: 20 - 20

C. NOW, CALCULATE THE FIRM’S CASH CONVERSION CYCLE. ASSUME A 365 DAY
YEAR.
ANSWER: A FIRM’S CASH CONVERSION CYCLE IS CALCULATED AS:
.
CYCLE
CONVERSION
CASH
PERIOD
DEFERRAL
PAYABLES
PERIOD
COLLECTION
SRECEIVABLE
PERIOD
CONVERSION
INVENTORY
=−+
SKI’S INVENTORY TURNOVER IS GIVEN AS 4.82 SO WE CAN CALCULATE ITS
INVENTORY CONVERSION PERIOD AS:
82.4
365
TURNOVERINVENTORY
365
= = 75.73 ≈ 76 DAYS.
SKI’S RECEIVABLES COLLECTION PERIOD IS EQUAL TO ITS DSO. ITS DSO IS
GIVEN AS 45.63 DAYS, OR APPROXIMATELY 46 DAYS.
WE ARE GIVEN THAT ITS PAYABLES DEFERRAL PERIOD IS 30 DAYS, SO NOW
WE HAVE ALL THE INDIVIDUAL COMPONENTS TO CALCULATE SKI’S CASH
CONVERSION CYCLE.
76 DAYS + 46 DAYS – 30 DAYS = 92 DAYS.
THUS, SKI’S CASH CONVERSION CYCLE IS APPROXIMATELY 91 DAYS.
D. WHAT MIGHT SKI DO TO REDUCE ITS CASH WITHOUT HARMING OPERATIONS?
ANSWER: TO THE EXTENT THAT “CASH AND SECURITIES” CONSIST OF LOW-YIELDING
SECURITIES, THEY COULD BE SOLD OFF AND THE CASH GENERATED COULD BE
USED TO REDUCE DEBT, TO BUY BACK STOCK, OR TO INVEST IN OPERATING
ASSETS.
IN AN ATTEMPT TO BETTER UNDERSTAND SKI’S CASH POSITION, BARNES
DEVELOPED A CASH BUDGET. DATA FOR THE FIRST TWO MONTHS OF THE YEAR
ARE SHOWN BELOW. (NOTE THAT BARNES’ PRELIMINARY CASH BUDGET DOES NOT
ACCOUNT FOR INTEREST INCOME OR INTEREST EXPENSE.) HE HAS THE
FIGURES FOR THE OTHER MONTHS, BUT THEY ARE NOT SHOWN.
Mini Case: 20 - 21

SKI’S CASH BUDGET FOR JANUARY AND FEBRUARY
NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL
I. COLLECTIONS AND PURCHASES WORKSHEET
(1) SALES (GROSS) $71,218 $68,212.00 $65,213.00 $52,475.00 $42,909 $30,524
COLLECTIONS:
(2) DURING MONTH OF SALE
(0.2)(0.98)(MONTH’S SALES) 12,781.75 10,285.10
(3) DURING FIRST MONTH AFTER SALE
0.7(PREVIOUS MONTH’S SALES) 47,748.40 45,649.10
(4) DURING SECOND MONTH AFTER SALE
0.1(SALES 2 MONTHS AGO) 7,121.80 6,821.20
(5) TOTAL COLLECTIONS (LINES 2 + 3 + 4) $67,651.95 $62,755.40
PURCHASES:
(6) 0.85(FORECASTED SALES
2 MONTHS FROM NOW) $44,603.75 $36,472.65 $25,945.40
(7) PAYMENTS (1-MONTH LAG) 44,603.75 36,472.65
II. CASH GAIN OR LOSS FOR MONTH
(8) COLLECTIONS (FROM SECTION I) $67,651.95 $62,755.40
(9) PAYMENTS FOR PURCHASES (FROM SECTION I) 44,603.75 36,472.65
(10) WAGES AND SALARIES 6,690.56 5,470.90
(11) RENT 2,500.00 2,500.00
(12) TAXES
(13) TOTAL PAYMENTS $53,794.31 $44,443.55
(14) NET CASH GAIN (LOSS) DURING MONTH
(LINE 8 - LINE 13) $13,857.64 $18,311.85
III. CASH SURPLUS OR LOAN REQUIREMENT
(15) CASH AT BEGINNING OF MONTH
IF NO BORROWING IS DONE $ 3,000.00 $16,857.64
(16) CUMULATIVE CASH (CASH AT START, + GAIN
OR - LOSS = LINE 14 + LINE 15) 16,857.64 35,169.49
(17) TARGET CASH BALANCE 1,500.00 1,500.00
(18) CUMULATIVE SURPLUS CASH OR LOANS OUTSTANDING
TO MAINTAIN $1,500 TARGET CASH BALANCE
(LINE 16 - LINE 17) $15,357.64 $33,669.49
Mini Case: 20 - 22

E. SHOULD DEPRECIATION EXPENSE BE EXPLICITLY INCLUDED IN THE CASH
BUDGET? WHY OR WHY NOT?
ANSWER: NO, DEPRECIATION EXPENSE IS A NONCASH CHARGE AND SHOULD NOT APPEAR
EXPLICITLY IN THE CASH BUDGET THAT FOCUSES ON THE ACTUAL CASH
FLOWING INTO AND OUT OF A FIRM. HOWEVER, A FIRM’S DEPRECIATION
EXPENSE DOES IMPACT ITS TAX LIABILITY, AND HENCE DEPRECIATION
AFFECTS SKI’S QUARTERLY TAX PAYMENTS.
F. IN HIS PRELIMINARY CASH BUDGET, BARNES HAS ASSUMED THAT ALL SALES
ARE COLLECTED AND, THUS, THAT SKI HAS NO BAD DEBTS. IS THIS
REALISTIC? IF NOT, HOW WOULD BAD DEBTS BE DEALT WITH IN A CASH
BUDGETING SENSE? (HINT: BAD DEBTS WILL AFFECT COLLECTIONS BUT NOT
PURCHASES.)
ANSWER: IT IS NOT REALISTIC TO ASSUME ZERO BAD DEBTS. WHEN CREDIT IS
GRANTED, BAD DEBTS SHOULD BE EXPECTED. COLLECTIONS IN EACH MONTH
WOULD BE LOWERED BY THE PERCENTAGE OF BAD DEBTS. PAYMENTS WOULD BE
UNCHANGED, SO THE RESULT WOULD BE THAT LOAN BALANCES WOULD BE LARGER
AND CASH SURPLUS BALANCES WOULD BE SMALLER BY THE DIFFERENCE IN THE
COLLECTION AMOUNTS.
Mini Case: 20 - 23

G. BARNES’ CASH BUDGET FOR THE ENTIRE YEAR, ALTHOUGH NOT GIVEN HERE, IS
BASED HEAVILY ON HIS FORECAST FOR MONTHLY SALES. SALES ARE EXPECTED
TO BE EXTREMELY LOW BETWEEN MAY AND SEPTEMBER BUT THEN INCREASE
DRAMATICALLY IN THE FALL AND WINTER. NOVEMBER IS TYPICALLY THE
FIRM’S BEST MONTH, WHEN SKI SHIPS EQUIPMENT TO RETAILERS FOR THE
HOLIDAY SEASON. INTERESTINGLY, BARNES’ FORECASTED CASH BUDGET
INDICATES THAT THE COMPANY’S CASH HOLDINGS WILL EXCEED THE TARGETED
CASH BALANCE EVERY MONTH EXCEPT FOR OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER, WHEN
SHIPMENTS WILL BE HIGH BUT COLLECTIONS WILL NOT BE COMING IN UNTIL
LATER. BASED ON THE RATIOS SHOWN EARLIER, DOES IT APPEAR THAT SKI’S
TARGET CASH BALANCE IS APPROPRIATE? IN ADDITION TO POSSIBLY
LOWERING THE TARGET CASH BALANCE, WHAT ACTIONS MIGHT SKI TAKE TO
BETTER IMPROVE ITS CASH MANAGEMENT POLICIES, AND HOW MIGHT THAT
AFFECT ITS EVA?
ANSWER: THE COMPANY’S TURNOVER OF CASH AND ITS PROJECTED CASH BUDGET SUGGEST
THAT THE COMPANY IS HOLDING TOO MUCH CASH. SKI COULD IMPROVE ITS
EVA BY EITHER INVESTING THE CASH IN PRODUCTIVE ASSETS, OR RETURNING
THE CASH TO SHAREHOLDERS. IF SKI USES THE CASH FOR PROFITABLE
INVESTMENTS, ITS COSTS WILL REMAIN THE SAME, BUT ITS OPERATING
INCOME WILL RISE, THEREBY INCREASING EVA. ON THE OTHER HAND, IF THE
COMPANY CHOOSES TO RETURN THE CASH TO ITS SHAREHOLDERS, FOR EXAMPLE,
BY INCREASING THE DIVIDEND OR REPURCHASING SHARES OF COMMON STOCK,
THE COMPANY’S REVENUES WOULD REMAIN THE SAME, BUT ITS OVERALL COST
OF CAPITAL WOULD FALL, THEREBY INCREASING EVA.
H. WHAT REASONS MIGHT SKI HAVE FOR MAINTAINING A RELATIVELY HIGH AMOUNT
OF CASH?
ANSWER: IF SALES TURN OUT TO BE CONSIDERABLY LESS THAN EXPECTED, THE COMPANY
COULD FACE A CASH SHORTFALL. A COMPANY MAY CHOOSE TO HOLD LARGE
AMOUNTS OF CASH IF IT DOES NOT HAVE MUCH FAITH IN ITS SALES FORECAST
OR IF IT IS VERY CONSERVATIVE. UNFORTUNATELY, GIVEN ITS CURRENT
PRESSURE TO PERFORM, SKI’S MANAGEMENT DOES NOT HAVE THE LUXURY TO BE
EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE.
Mini Case: 20 - 24

I. WHAT ARE THE THREE CATEGORIES OF INVENTORY COSTS? IF THE COMPANY
TAKES STEPS TO REDUCE ITS INVENTORY, WHAT EFFECT WOULD THIS HAVE ON
THE VARIOUS COSTS OF HOLDING INVENTORY?
ANSWER: THE THREE CATEGORIES OF INVENTORY COSTS ARE CARRYING COSTS, ORDERING
COSTS, AND THE COSTS OF RUNNING SHORT. CARRYING COSTS INCLUDE THE
COST OF CAPITAL TIED UP, STORAGE AND HANDLING COSTS, INSURANCE,
PROPERTY TAXES, AND DEPRECIATION AND OBSOLESCENCE. ORDERING,
SHIPPING, AND RECEIVING COSTS INCLUDE THE COST OF PLACING ORDERS
(INCLUDING PRODUCTION AND SET-UP COSTS) AND SHIPPING AND HANDLING
COSTS. THE COSTS OF RUNNING SHORT INCLUDE LOSS OF SALES, LOSS OF
CUSTOMER GOODWILL, AND THE DISRUPTION OF PRODUCTION SCHEDULES.
IF THE FIRM REDUCES THE AMOUNT OF INVENTORY IT HOLDS, CARRYING
COSTS WILL BE LOWERED; HOWEVER, ITS ORDERING COSTS WILL INCREASE
BECAUSE THE FIRM WILL SET UP PRODUCTION RUNS MORE FREQUENTLY. IN
ADDITION, BY REDUCING ITS INVENTORY INVESTMENT THE FIRM COULD
INCREASE ITS CHANCES OF RUNNING SHORT, WHICH RESULTS IN LOSSES OF
SALES AND CUSTOMER GOODWILL.
J. IS THERE ANY REASON TO THINK THAT SKI MAY BE HOLDING TOO MUCH
INVENTORY? IF SO, HOW WOULD THAT AFFECT EVA AND ROE?
ANSWER: AS POINTED OUT IN PART A, SKI’S INVENTORY TURNOVER (4.82) IS
CONSIDERABLY LOWER THAN THE AVERAGE FIRM’S TURNOVER (7.00). THIS
INDICATES THAT THE FIRM IS CARRYING A LOT OF INVENTORY PER DOLLAR OF
SALES.
BY HOLDING MORE INVENTORY PER DOLLAR OF SALES THAN IS NECESSARY,
THE FIRM IS INCREASING ITS COSTS, WHICH REDUCES ITS ROE. IN
ADDITION, THIS ADDITIONAL WORKING CAPITAL MUST BE FINANCED, SO EVA
IS LOWERED TOO.
Mini Case: 20 - 25

K. IF THE COMPANY REDUCES ITS INVENTORY WITHOUT ADVERSELY AFFECTING
SALES, WHAT EFFECT SHOULD THIS HAVE ON THE COMPANY’S CASH POSITION
(1) IN THE SHORT RUN AND (2) IN THE LONG RUN? EXPLAIN IN TERMS OF
THE CASH BUDGET AND THE BALANCE SHEET.
ANSWER: REDUCING INVENTORY PURCHASES WILL INCREASE THE COMPANY’S CASH
HOLDINGS IN THE SHORT RUN, THUS REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF FINANCING OR
THE TARGET CASH BALANCE NEEDED. IN THE LONG RUN, THE COMPANY IS
LIKELY TO REDUCE ITS CASH HOLDINGS IN ORDER TO INCREASE ITS EVA. SKI
CAN USE THE “EXCESS CASH” TO MAKE INVESTMENTS IN MORE PRODUCTIVE
ASSETS SUCH AS PLANT AND EQUIPMENT. ALTERNATIVELY, THE FIRM CAN
DISTRIBUTE THE “EXCESS CASH” TO ITS SHAREHOLDERS THROUGH HIGHER
DIVIDENDS OR REPURCHASING ITS SHARES.
L. BARNES KNOWS THAT SKI SELLS ON THE SAME CREDIT TERMS AS OTHER FIRMS
IN ITS INDUSTRY. USE THE RATIOS PRESENTED EARLIER TO EXPLAIN WHETHER
SKI’S CUSTOMERS PAY MORE OR LESS PROMPTLY THAN THOSE OF ITS
COMPETITORS. IF THERE ARE DIFFERENCES, DOES THAT SUGGEST THAT SKI
SHOULD TIGHTEN OR LOOSEN ITS CREDIT POLICY? WHAT FOUR VARIABLES MAKE
UP A FIRM’S CREDIT POLICY, AND IN WHAT DIRECTION SHOULD EACH BE
CHANGED BY SKI?
ANSWER: SKI’S DSO IS 45.63 DAYS AS COMPARED WITH 32 DAYS FOR THE AVERAGE
FIRM IN ITS INDUSTRY. THIS SUGGESTS THAT SKI’S CUSTOMERS ARE PAYING
LESS PROMPTLY THAN THOSE OF ITS COMPETITORS. BECAUSE THE FIRM’S DSO
IS HIGHER THAN THE INDUSTRY AVERAGE, THE FIRM SHOULD TIGHTEN ITS
CREDIT POLICY IN AN ATTEMPT TO LOWER ITS DSO.
THE FOUR VARIABLES THAT MAKE UP A FIRM’S CREDIT POLICY ARE
(1) DISCOUNT AMOUNT AND PERIOD, (2) CREDIT PERIOD, (3) CREDIT
STANDARDS, AND (4) COLLECTION POLICY. CASH DISCOUNTS GENERALLY
PRODUCE TWO BENEFITS: (1) THEY ATTRACT NEW CUSTOMERS WHO VIEW
DISCOUNTS AS A PRICE REDUCTION, THUS SALES WOULD INCREASE, AND (2)
THEY CAUSE A REDUCTION IN THE DAYS SALES OUTSTANDING (DSO) SINCE
SOME ESTABLISHED CUSTOMERS WILL PAY MORE PROMPTLY TO TAKE ADVANTAGE
OF THE DISCOUNT, THUS THE LEVEL OF RECEIVABLES HELD WOULD DECLINE.
DISCOUNTS MIGHT ENCOURAGE CUSTOMERS NOW PAYING LATE TO PAY MORE
PROMPTLY. OF COURSE, THESE BENEFITS ARE OFFSET TO SOME DEGREE BY THE
Mini Case: 20 - 26

DOLLAR COST OF THE DISCOUNTS. THE EFFECT ON BAD DEBT EXPENSE IS
INDETERMINATE. IF THE FIRM TIGHTENED ITS CREDIT POLICY IT IS UNCLEAR
WHAT THE FIRM WOULD DO WITH ITS CASH DISCOUNT POLICY. THE FIRM
COULD DECREASE THE DISCOUNT PERIOD AND KEEP DISCOUNTS UNCHANGED.
CREDIT PERIOD IS THE LENGTH OF TIME ALLOWED ALL “QUALIFIED”
CUSTOMERS TO PAY FOR THEIR PURCHASES. THE SHORTER A FIRM’S CREDIT
PERIOD, THE SHORTER THE FIRM’S DAYS SALES OUTSTANDING, AND THE LOWER
THE LEVEL OF RECEIVABLES HELD. A SHORTER CREDIT PERIOD MIGHT ALSO
TEND TO DECREASE SALES, ESPECIALLY WHEN A COMPETITOR’S CREDIT PERIOD
IS LONGER THAN THE FIRM’S OWN CREDIT PERIOD. THE EFFECT OF THE
CREDIT PERIOD ON BAD DEBT EXPENSE IS INDETERMINATE.
IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR CREDIT IN THE FIRST PLACE, CUSTOMERS MUST
MEET THE FIRM’S CREDIT STANDARDS. THESE DICTATE THE MINIMUM
ACCEPTABLE FINANCIAL POSITION REQUIRED OF CUSTOMERS TO RECEIVE
CREDIT. ALSO, A FIRM MAY IMPOSE DIFFERING CREDIT LIMITS DEPENDING ON
THE CUSTOMER’S FINANCIAL STRENGTH. TIGHT CREDIT STANDARDS WOULD TEND
TO DECREASE SALES (FEWER CUSTOMERS WOULD QUALIFY FOR CREDIT),
DECREASE THE LEVEL OF RECEIVABLES HELD, AND WOULD CAUSE A DECREASE
IN THE AMOUNT OF BAD DEBT EXPENSES. THE LEVEL OF RECEIVABLES HELD
WOULD BE DECREASED DUE TO THE LOWER LEVEL OF SALES AND ALSO THE
PROBABILITY THAT CUSTOMERS NOW QUALIFYING FOR CREDIT WOULD TAKE LESS
TIME TO PAY. BAD DEBT EXPENSES SHOULD DECREASE DUE TO RAISING
CUSTOMERS’ MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE FINANCIAL POSITIONS.
FINALLY, COLLECTION POLICY REFERS TO THE PROCEDURES THAT THE FIRM
FOLLOWS TO COLLECT PAST-DUE ACCOUNTS. THESE CAN RANGE FROM A SIMPLE
LETTER OR PHONE CALL TO TURNING THE ACCOUNT OVER TO A COLLECTION
AGENCY. A TIGHT COLLECTION POLICY WOULD DECREASE THE LEVEL OF
RECEIVABLES HELD, AS CUSTOMERS WOULD DECREASE THE LENGTH OF TIME
THEY TOOK TO PAY THEIR BILLS. A TIGHT COLLECTION POLICY WOULD ALSO
CAUSE A DECREASE IN THE AMOUNT OF BAD DEBT LOSSES THE FIRM INCURRED.
A TIGHTENING OF CREDIT POLICY WOULD TEND TO DECREASE SALES,
DECREASE THE LEVEL OF RECEIVABLES HELD, AND DECREASE THE AMOUNT OF
BAD DEBT EXPENSES.
Mini Case: 20 - 27

M. DOES SKI FACE ANY RISKS IF IT TIGHTENS ITS CREDIT POLICY?
ANSWER: A TIGHTER CREDIT POLICY MAY DISCOURAGE SALES. SOME CUSTOMERS MAY
CHOOSE TO GO ELSEWHERE IF THEY ARE PRESSURED TO PAY THEIR BILLS
SOONER.
N. IF THE COMPANY REDUCES ITS DSO WITHOUT SERIOUSLY AFFECTING SALES,
WHAT EFFECT WOULD THIS HAVE ON ITS CASH POSITION (1) IN THE SHORT
RUN AND (2) IN THE LONG RUN? ANSWER IN TERMS OF THE CASH BUDGET AND
THE BALANCE SHEET. WHAT EFFECT SHOULD THIS HAVE ON EVA IN THE LONG
RUN?
ANSWER: IF CUSTOMERS PAY THEIR BILLS SOONER, THIS WILL INCREASE THE
COMPANY’S CASH POSITION IN THE SHORT RUN, WHICH WOULD DECREASE THE
AMOUNT OF FINANCING OR THE TARGET CASH BALANCE NEEDED. OVER TIME,
THE COMPANY WOULD HOPEFULLY INVEST THIS CASH IN MORE PRODUCTIVE
ASSETS, OR PAY IT OUT TO SHAREHOLDERS. BOTH OF THESE ACTIONS WOULD
INCREASE EVA.
IN ADDITION TO IMPROVING THE MANAGEMENT OF ITS CURRENT ASSETS, SKI
IS ALSO REVIEWING THE WAYS IN WHICH IT FINANCES ITS CURRENT ASSETS.
WITH THIS CONCERN IN MIND, DAN IS ALSO TRYING TO ANSWER THE
FOLLOWING QUESTIONS.
O. IS IT LIKELY THAT SKI COULD MAKE SIGNIFICANTLY GREATER USE OF
ACCRUALS?
ANSWER: NO, SKI COULD NOT MAKE GREATER USE OF ITS ACCRUALS. ACCRUALS ARISE
BECAUSE (1) WORKERS ARE PAID AFTER THEY HAVE ACTUALLY PROVIDED THEIR
SERVICES, AND (2) TAXES ARE PAID AFTER THE PROFITS HAVE BEEN EARNED.
THUS, ACCRUALS REPRESENT CASH OWED EITHER TO WORKERS OR TO THE IRS.
THE COST OF ACCRUALS IS GENERALLY CONSIDERED TO BE ZERO, SINCE NO
EXPLICIT INTEREST MUST BE PAID ON THESE ITEMS.
Mini Case: 20 - 28

THE AMOUNT OF ACCRUALS IS GENERALLY LIMITED BY THE AMOUNT OF
WAGES PAID AND THE FIRM’S PROFITABILITY, AS WELL AS BY INDUSTRY
CONVENTIONS REGARDING WHEN WAGE PAYMENTS ARE MADE AND IRS
REGULATIONS REGARDING TAX PAYMENTS. (INCREASINGLY, CONGRESS IS
PUTTING BUSINESSES ON A PAY-AS-YOU-GO, OR EVEN PAY-AHEAD-OF-TIME
BASIS THROUGH THE USE OF ESTIMATED TAXES.) A FIRM CANNOT ORDINARILY
CONTROL ITS ACCRUALS. FIRMS USE ALL THE ACCRUALS THEY CAN, BUT THEY
HAVE LITTLE CONTROL OVER THE LEVELS OF THESE ACCOUNTS.
P. ASSUME THAT SKI BUYS ON TERMS OF 1/10, NET 30, BUT THAT IT CAN GET
AWAY WITH PAYING ON THE 40TH DAY IF IT CHOOSES NOT TO TAKE
DISCOUNTS. ALSO, ASSUME THAT IT PURCHASES $506,985 OF EQUIPMENT PER
YEAR, NET OF DISCOUNTS. HOW MUCH FREE TRADE CREDIT CAN THE COMPANY
GET, HOW MUCH COSTLY TRADE CREDIT CAN IT GET, AND WHAT IS THE
PERCENTAGE COST OF THE COSTLY CREDIT? SHOULD SKI TAKE DISCOUNTS?
ANSWER: IF SKI’S NET PURCHASES ARE $506,985 ANNUALLY, THEN, WITH A 1 PERCENT
DISCOUNT, ITS GROSS PURCHASES ARE $506,985/0.99 = $512,106. NET
DAILY PURCHASES FROM THIS SUPPLIER ARE $506,985/365 = $1,389.
IF THE DISCOUNT IS TAKEN, THEN SKI MUST PAY THIS SUPPLIER AT THE
END OF DAY 10 FOR PURCHASES MADE ON DAY 1, ON DAY 11 FOR PURCHASES
MADE ON DAY 2, AND SO ON. THUS, IN A STEADY STATE, SKI WILL ON
AVERAGE HAVE 10 DAYS’ WORTH OF PURCHASES IN PAYABLES, SO,
PAYABLES = 10($1,389) = $13,890.
IF THE DISCOUNT IS NOT TAKEN, THEN SKI WILL WAIT 40 DAYS BEFORE PAYING,
SO
PAYABLES = 40($1,389) = $55,560.
THEREFORE:
TRADE CREDIT IF DISCOUNTS ARE NOT TAKEN: $55,560 = TOTAL TRADE CREDIT
TRADE CREDIT IF DISCOUNTS ARE TAKEN: -13,890 = FREE TRADE CREDIT
DIFFERENCE: $41,670 = COSTLY TRADE CREDIT
TO OBTAIN $41,670 OF COSTLY TRADE CREDIT, SKI MUST GIVE UP
0.01($512,106) = $5,121 IN LOST DISCOUNTS ANNUALLY. SINCE THE
Mini Case: 20 - 29

FORGONE DISCOUNTS PAY FOR $41,670 OF CREDIT, THE NOMINAL ANNUAL
INTEREST RATE IS 12.29 PERCENT:
670,41$
121,5$
= 0.1229 = 12.29%.
HERE IS A FORMULA THAT CAN BE USED TO FIND THE NOMINAL ANNUAL
INTEREST RATE OF COSTLY TRADE CREDIT:
CREDITTRADEOF
COSTNOMINAL
=
.
PERIODDISCOUNTTAKENDAYS
DAYS536
%DISCOUNT-1
%DISCOUNT
−
×
IN THIS SITUATION,
%.912.2=290.12=1667.120.0101=
10-40
536
99
1
××
NOTE (1) THAT THE FORMULA GIVES THE SAME NOMINAL ANNUAL INTEREST
RATE AS WAS CALCULATED EARLIER, (2) THAT THE FIRST TERM IS THE
PERIODIC COST OF THE CREDIT (SKI SPENDS $1 TO GET THE USE OF $99),
AND (3) THAT THE SECOND TERM IS THE NUMBER OF “SAVINGS PERIODS” PER
YEAR (SKI DELAYS PAYMENT FOR 40 - 10 = 30 DAYS), AND THERE ARE
365/30 = 12.1667 30-DAY PERIODS IN A YEAR. THEREFORE, WE COULD
CALCULATE THE EXACT EFFECTIVE ANNUAL INTEREST RATE AS: EFFECTIVE
RATE = (1.0101)12.1667
- 1 = 13.01%.
IF SKI CAN OBTAIN FINANCING FROM ITS BANK (OR FROM OTHER SOURCES)
AT AN INTEREST RATE OF LESS THAN 13.01 PERCENT, IT SHOULD BORROW THE
FUNDS AND TAKE DISCOUNTS.
Q. SKI TRIES TO MATCH THE MATURITY OF ITS ASSETS AND LIABILITIES.
DESCRIBE HOW SKI COULD ADOPT EITHER A MORE AGGRESSIVE OR MORE
CONSERVATIVE FINANCING POLICY.
ANSWER: THERE ARE THREE ALTERNATIVE CURRENT ASSET FINANCING POLICIES:
AGGRESSIVE, MODERATE, AND RELAXED. A MODERATE FINANCING POLICY
MATCHES ASSET AND LIABILITY MATURITIES. (OF COURSE EXACT MATURITY
MATCHING IS NOT POSSIBLE BECAUSE OF (1) THE UNCERTAINTY OF ASSET
Mini Case: 20 - 30

LIVES AND (2) SOME COMMON EQUITY MUST BE USED AND COMMON EQUITY HAS
NO MATURITY.) WITH THIS STRATEGY, THE FIRM MINIMIZES ITS RISK THAT
IT WILL BE UNABLE TO PAY OFF MATURING OBLIGATIONS. AN AGGRESSIVE
FINANCING POLICY OCCURS WHEN THE FIRM FINANCES ALL OF ITS FIXED
ASSETS WITH LONG-TERM CAPITAL, BUT PART OF ITS PERMANENT CURRENT
ASSETS WITH SHORT-TERM, NONSPONTANEOUS CREDIT. THERE ARE DEGREES OF
AGGRESSIVENESS, IN FACT, A FIRM COULD CHOOSE TO FINANCE ALL OF ITS
PERMANENT CURRENT ASSETS AND PART OF ITS FIXED ASSETS WITH SHORT-
TERM CREDIT; THIS WOULD BE A HIGHLY AGGRESSIVE POSITION, AND ONE
THAT WOULD SUBJECT THE FIRM TO THE DANGERS OF RISING INTEREST RATES
AS WELL AS TO LOAN RENEWAL PROBLEMS. A CONSERVATIVE FINANCING
POLICY OCCURS WHEN THE FIRM FINANCES ALL OF ITS PERMANENT ASSET
REQUIREMENTS AND SOME OF ITS SEASONAL DEMANDS WITH PERMANENT
CAPITAL. THIS POSITION IS A VERY SAFE ONE. THEREFORE, AN
AGGRESSIVE FINANCING POLICY USES THE GREATEST AMOUNT OF SHORT-TERM
DEBT, WHILE THE CONSERVATIVE POLICY USES THE LEAST. THE MATURITY
MATCHING POLICY FALLS BETWEEN THESE TWO POLICIES.
Mini Case: 20 - 31

R. WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF USING SHORT-TERM DEBT
AS A SOURCE OF FINANCING?
ANSWER: ALTHOUGH USING SHORT-TERM CREDIT IS GENERALLY RISKIER THAN USING
LONG-TERM CREDIT, SHORT-TERM CREDIT DOES HAVE SOME SIGNIFICANT
ADVANTAGES. A SHORT-TERM LOAN CAN BE OBTAINED MUCH FASTER THAN
LONG-TERM CREDIT. LENDERS INSIST ON A MORE THOROUGH FINANCIAL
EXAMINATION BEFORE EXTENDING LONG-TERM CREDIT. IF A FIRM’S NEEDS
FOR FUNDS ARE SEASONAL OR CYCLICAL, IT MAY NOT WANT TO COMMIT TO
LONG-TERM DEBT BECAUSE: (1) FLOTATION COSTS ARE GENERALLY HIGH FOR
LONG-TERM DEBT BUT TRIVIAL FOR SHORT-TERM DEBT. (2) PREPAYMENT PEN-
ALTIES WITH LONG-TERM DEBT CAN BE EXPENSIVE. SHORT-TERM DEBT
PROVIDES FLEXIBILITY. (3) LONG-TERM LOAN AGREEMENTS CONTAIN
PROVISIONS THAT CONSTRAIN A FIRM’S FUTURE ACTIONS. SHORT-TERM
CREDIT AGREEMENTS ARE LESS ONEROUS. (4) THE YIELD CURVE IS NORMALLY
UPWARD SLOPING, INDICATING THAT INTEREST RATES ARE GENERALLY LOWER
ON SHORT-TERM THAN ON LONG-TERM DEBT.
EVEN THOUGH SHORT-TERM DEBT IS OFTEN LESS EXPENSIVE THAN LONG-
TERM DEBT, SHORT-TERM DEBT SUBJECTS THE FIRM TO MORE RISK THAN LONG-
TERM FINANCING. THE REASONS FOR THIS ARE: (1) IF A FIRM USES LONG-
TERM DEBT, ITS INTEREST COSTS WILL BE RELATIVELY STABLE OVER TIME;
HOWEVER, IF THE FIRM USES SHORT-TERM DEBT, ITS INTEREST EXPENSE WILL
FLUCTUATE WIDELY. (2) IF A FIRM BORROWS HEAVILY ON A SHORT-TERM
BASIS, IT MAY FIND ITSELF UNABLE TO REPAY THIS DEBT, AND IT MAY BE
IN SUCH A WEAK FINANCIAL POSITION THAT THE LENDER WILL NOT EXTEND
THE LOAN, WHICH COULD FORCE THE FIRM INTO BANKRUPTCY.
Mini Case: 20 - 32

S. WOULD IT BE FEASIBLE FOR SKI TO FINANCE WITH COMMERCIAL PAPER?
ANSWER: IT WOULD NOT BE FEASIBLE FOR SKI TO FINANCE WITH COMMERCIAL PAPER.
COMMERCIAL PAPER IS UNSECURED, SHORT-TERM DEBT ISSUED BY LARGE,
FINANCIALLY STRONG FIRMS AND SOLD PRIMARILY TO OTHER BUSINESS FIRMS,
TO INSURANCE COMPANIES, TO PENSION FUNDS, TO MONEY MARKET MUTUAL
FUNDS, AND TO BANKS. MATURITIES ARE GENERALLY 270 DAYS (9 MONTHS)
OR LESS, BECAUSE SEC REGISTRATION IS REQUIRED ON MATURITIES BEYOND
270 DAYS. THERE IS A VERY ACTIVE, LIQUID MARKET FOR COMMERCIAL
PAPER, AND, SINCE THERE IS VIRTUALLY NO DEFAULT RISK, COMMERCIAL
PAPER RATES ARE GENERALLY LESS THAN THE PRIME RATE, AND NOT MUCH
MORE THAN THE T-BILL RATE. NOTE, THOUGH, THAT ISSUERS OF COMMERCIAL
PAPER ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE BACK-UP LINES OF BANK CREDIT THAT CAN BE
USED TO PAY OFF THE PAPER IF NEED BE WHEN IT MATURES. THESE BACK-UP
CREDIT LINES HAVE A COST, AND THIS COST MUST BE ADDED TO THE
INTEREST RATE ON THE PAPER TO DETERMINE ITS EFFECTIVE COST. SINCE
ONLY LARGE, WELL-KNOWN, FINANCIALLY STRONG COMPANIES CAN ISSUE
COMMERCIAL PAPER, IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR SKI TO TAP THIS MARKET.
Mini Case: 20 - 33

182571950 im20-doc

More Related Content

What's hot (19)

Similar to 182571950 im20-doc (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

182571950 im20-doc