In-Situ Remediation of Hexavalent Chromium, Antimony and
 Nickel with Sub-Micron (Nano)-Scale Ferrous Sulfide Slurry

           Jim V. Rouse, Richard H. Christensen, PhD LPG,
              & Steven R. Irvin µg/L
                                (AcuityES, Fishers, IN)




                                                            © AcuityES 2013
Acuity Environmental Solutions

 Company’s Primary Focus:
 •   Environmental Liability Consulting (how to manage liabilities)
 •   Site Investigation – Soil, Groundwater, Air
 •   Remediation of contaminated Sites
 •   Expert Witness Testimony

 Company’s Secondary Focus:
 •   Environmental Permitting – Air, Water, Waste
 •   Environmental Compliance




                                                                © AcuityES 2013
In-Situ Remediation of Hexavalent Chromium,
Antimony and Nickel with Nano-Scale Ferrous
               Sulfide Slurry

 Presented At:
 •   International Seminar on Remediation and Redevelopment of
        Contaminated Sites, Sao Paulo, Brazil
 •   AEHS West Coast Conference, San Diego, CA
 •   USEPA’s Sustainable Remediation International Conference,
          Amherst, MA
 •   AWPA National Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL & Nashville, TN
 •   Midwest States Environmental Consulting Assoc., Indianapolis, IN
 •   Battelle Conference, Monterey, California




                                                             © AcuityES 2013
Case Study In…
In Situ Geochemical Reduction
 Stabilization (i.e., immobilizing) of metal constituents by
 chemically reducing the metals of concern to less soluble forms
 through the manipulation of geochemical factors such as:
    • pH
    • Oxidation potential (Eh or ORP)
    • Complexation
    • Sorption
    • Ion exchange

 Resulting in the elimination of metallic contaminants by:
   • Precipitation
   • Dissolution
   • Oxidation
   • Complexation


                                                             © AcuityES 2013
Key Project Considerations
 Competitor’s Proposals for Project included:
 • Off-site disposal of hazardous soils
 • 15 - 20 year pump and treat remedy for groundwater
 • >$8 Million
     Note: original estimates based on >50% smaller source area


 Our Solution:
 • In Situ remediation of impacted soils and groundwater
 • Goal: 2 year total remedy - 1/8th the time -
 • Cost: $4.5 Million - Nearly 50% below competitor’s bids -




                                                         © AcuityES 2013
Chrome Plating
       Gone Wild!




                    © AcuityES 2013
First things
  first…

                                    Segregation of Waste for Disposal




Interior Building Decontamination


                 Building Demolition

                                                           © AcuityES 2013
First things
 first…


                                      Groundwater Sampling




Soil Boring & Well Installation


                      Soil Sampling

                                                       © AcuityES 2013
Site Location -- Muncie, IN

                         GW
                       Impacts




                           Source
                           Areas



                                 © AcuityES 2013
Site Plan for X-Section Line
Site Conditions
                             A’
First investigation – 2005

AcuityES - 2009




                                  A


                                      © AcuityES 2013
Geologic X-Section

     FORMER
    BASEMENT
   SOURCE AREA




                     © AcuityES 2013
Hydrogeology
Unconfined Aquifer

Clay to 15 feet (w/stringers)
Sands & fine gravels

Static Water at 15’ bgl

Saturated thickness
   5’ in SE to
      > 25’ in NW




                                © AcuityES 2013
Soil Impacts
                                  7,900 mg/Kg maximum Cr+6

                                  3,600 mg/Kg Cr+6 at 12’ bgl

                                 State Cleanup Goal - 38 mg/Kg




• Two Adjacent Source Areas
• 5,400 cubic yards of impact
• Perched water sand stringers




                                                          © AcuityES 2013
Groundwater
Impacts
      On-Site
       Cr+6
      800,000 µg/L


    9,700,000 µg/L




   Groundwater COCs          66,000 sq ft (320 ft long) Plume
   Cr+6, Sb, As, and Ni      Offsite Cr+6 at 58,800 µg/L

            State Cleanup Goal- 100 µg/L Cr+6
                                                    © AcuityES 2013
In Situ Chemical Reduction
          BENCH TESTED CHEMICALS REDUCTANTS

•Ferrous Sulfate : FeSO4·7H2O       •Sodium Thiosulfate : Na2S2O3
•Ferrous Sulfide : FeS              •Sodium Metabisulfite : Na2S2O5
•Calcium Polysulfide (CPS) : CaSx   •Sodium Sulfite : Na2SO3
                                    •Zero Valent Iron




                                                          © AcuityES 2013
Selected Ferrous Sulfide (FeS)
    FeS, Hybrid Form (aka precipitated pyrite)
    Liquid suspension of 7% FeS
    FeS, hybrid - With additional 2% free Sulfide
                  to simulate CaSx

    Nanoscale: 98% crystals <5 microns

    Cationic (Iron)
     4 H2O + Cr042- + 3 Fe2- + 4 OH- 
            3 Fe(OH)3+ Cr(OH)3 (Solid)

    Anionic (sulfide)
     17 H2O + 8 Cr042- + 3 HS- 
            3 S + 8 Cr(OH)3 (Solid) + 12 OH-

                                                    © AcuityES 2013
In Situ Soil
      Blending

                                   GPS Grid Network – 10’ x 10’
                                 (100’ x 70’ to 15’) & Shallow to 5’




Dual Axis Blender – 15’ Plunge
Total Area – 130’ x 110’

             Computerized Dosing

                                                          © AcuityES 2013
In Situ Soil Blending




     Dual Axis Blender
     FeS injection/mixing

                            © AcuityES 2013
In Situ Soil Blending




                  Thorough Mixing to 15’ BGL

                                     © AcuityES 2013
In Situ Soil Blending
    Completed in 2 weeks
    Total FeS = 78,300 gallons
    Subsequent stabilization with aglime required




                                                © AcuityES 2013
Confirmation Sampling




                        © AcuityES 2013
Groundwater Injections – FeS
THE NUMBERS
155 Inject Pts
15 ft ROI
6 wks complete




                                 © AcuityES 2013
Groundwater Injections

  Difficult
 Injections

Boulder Fields

  6’ caliche
(calcified silt)

Lodgement till




                             © AcuityES 2013
Groundwater
  Injections




  FeS Injection Totes
 35,385 gallons injected
                                 Rotosonic Drilling
                           Top Down Injection – 5ft intervals

                                                  © AcuityES 2013
Groundwater Injections

 Sensitivity to
the Community
   Required


 Residential
   Hours




                              © AcuityES 2013
Preferential Flow Paths
15 – 20’ bgl
Sand Unit




                             © AcuityES 2013
Preferential Flow Paths
20 - 25’ bgl
Sand Unit




                            © AcuityES 2013
Pre-Treatment   Cr +6



State Cleanup
   Goal of
  100 µg/L




                            © AcuityES 2013
FeS Reductant Injection




                          © AcuityES 2013
1 st   Q Post-Treatment   Cr +6




                                  © AcuityES 2013
2 nd   Q Post-Treatment   Cr +6




                                  © AcuityES 2013
3 rd   Q Post-Treatment   Cr +6




                                  © AcuityES 2013
1 st   Supplemental Injection




                                © AcuityES 2013
4 th   Q Post-Treatment   Cr +6




                                  © AcuityES 2013
5 th   Q Post-Treatment   Cr +6




                                  © AcuityES 2013
6 th   Q Post-Treatment   Cr +6




                                  © AcuityES 2013
7 th   Q Post-Treatment   Cr +6




                                  © AcuityES 2013
2 nd   Supplemental Injection




                                © AcuityES 2013
8 th   –   10 th   Q Post-Treatment   Cr +6




                                       © AcuityES 2013
Antimony Treatment
   Antimony Concentrations:
         Detected in 25 monitoring wells
         on-Site up to 30,000 µg/L
         off-Site up to 4,700 µg/L

         State Industrial Cleanup level - 41 µg/L
         State Residential Cleanup Level - 6 µg/L

   Goal for Antimony:
          Fixate onto Goethite (FeO(OH)) or
          Precipitate as stibnite (Sb2S3)




                                                    © AcuityES 2013
Pre-Treatment Antimony

State Cleanup
   Goal of
    6 µg/L




                         © AcuityES 2013
FeS Reductant Injection




                          © AcuityES 2013
1 st   Q Post-Treatment Antimony




                               © AcuityES 2013
2 nd   Q Post-Treatment Antimony




                              © AcuityES 2013
3 rd   Q Post-Treatment Antimony




                               © AcuityES 2013
1 st   Supplemental Injection




                                © AcuityES 2013
4 th   -   10 th   Q Post-Treatment Antimony

All results less
 than method
detection level
       of
     6 µg/L




                                        © AcuityES 2013
Nickel Treatment
   Nickel Concentrations
         Detected in 10 wells exceeding cleanup levels
           off-Site up to 4,100 µg/L
           on-Site up to 50,000 µg/L

          State Industrial Cleanup level – 2,000 µg/L
          State Residential Cleanup Level - 730 µg/L

   Goal for Nickel:
          Fixate as: westerveldite ([FeNiCo]As) or
                     pentlandite (FeNiS)




                                                     © AcuityES 2013
Pre-Treatment Nickel

State Cleanup
   Goal of
  730 µg/L




                        © AcuityES 2013
FeS Reductant Injection




                          © AcuityES 2013
1st Q Post-Treatment Nickel

All results less
 than method
detection level
       of
    50 µg/L

     No
subsequent
 detections




                              © AcuityES 2013
Arsenic
Arsenic –   Pre-treatment As detected in 13 wells
            @ concentrations of 11 µg/L to 360 µg/L

            10th Quarter Sampling results:
                   only 2 wells @ 11 & 12 µg/L


            Goal for Arsenic
            Fixate as: orpiment (As2S3) or
                       arsenopyrite (FeAsS)



                                                 © AcuityES 2013
The Site Today




                 © AcuityES 2013
ISCR Benefits
1. In situ soil blending eliminated need for off-Site
   hazardous waste disposal. (> 10,000 Tons)

2. In situ groundwater geochemical reduction
   eliminated need for prolonged pump and treat.

3. In situ geochemical reduction reduced time
   period of remediation from > 15 years to about 2
   years.




                                                  © AcuityES 2013
CONTACT
Richard H. Christensen, PhD, LPG – rchristensen@acuityes.com
             Steven R. Irvin – Irvin@acuityes.com
             Jim V. Rouse – jrouse@acuityes.com

                      317-570-4919

               Past Teaming Partners
     CDM Smith               Mundell & Associates
     Burns & McDonnell       CALIBRE
     Professional Engineers  MWH Global
     Malcom Pirnie           Carndo MMA

                   www.acuityes.com

                                                       © AcuityES 2013

More Related Content

PPTX
Sand2016 7941 pe nea salt club presentation 082216 hansen llm
PDF
Parallel session 2 2 evaluation of agronomic practices on growth, yield of ca...
PDF
Saskatchewan Geological Open House Presentation
PPTX
Full Cycle Tailings Management - Fosterville Gold Mine
PDF
Sustainable Soil Surfactants for Turfgrass Management
PDF
Nykilde geoweb mining design and contruction ebinder
PDF
Ges Corporate Marketing
PDF
Arctic the final frontier
Sand2016 7941 pe nea salt club presentation 082216 hansen llm
Parallel session 2 2 evaluation of agronomic practices on growth, yield of ca...
Saskatchewan Geological Open House Presentation
Full Cycle Tailings Management - Fosterville Gold Mine
Sustainable Soil Surfactants for Turfgrass Management
Nykilde geoweb mining design and contruction ebinder
Ges Corporate Marketing
Arctic the final frontier

Viewers also liked (20)

PDF
Fidelizacion museos
PPTX
Will PowerPoint for Food
PDF
ENVIRON Utility MACT Regulatory Summary
PPTX
Crossroads
PDF
Golfers Adopt A Highway Blog
DOCX
Print net
PPTX
Alphatech 2011-12
PPTX
Srivastav, Piyush, NAQS Environmental Experts, Crash Course in PSD Permitting...
PPTX
Literatura II
PDF
Traces - 2015 Winter - A Tresure Hunt
PPTX
Gutenberg y Google
PDF
Pravila zop
DOCX
Evolucion De Redes De Computadoras
PPS
Team Building
PPTX
Golars networks ccie security ppt
PDF
SF Rec & Parks 2016-2020 strategic plan
PDF
How to Block NDR Spam
DOCX
US Landmarks Webquest
PDF
Career Fair Guidebook Spring 2010
PDF
Iedc wwgd final
Fidelizacion museos
Will PowerPoint for Food
ENVIRON Utility MACT Regulatory Summary
Crossroads
Golfers Adopt A Highway Blog
Print net
Alphatech 2011-12
Srivastav, Piyush, NAQS Environmental Experts, Crash Course in PSD Permitting...
Literatura II
Traces - 2015 Winter - A Tresure Hunt
Gutenberg y Google
Pravila zop
Evolucion De Redes De Computadoras
Team Building
Golars networks ccie security ppt
SF Rec & Parks 2016-2020 strategic plan
How to Block NDR Spam
US Landmarks Webquest
Career Fair Guidebook Spring 2010
Iedc wwgd final
Ad

Similar to 2013 AcuityES Case Study (20)

PDF
H&L Remediation 2011
PDF
Aoc sediment update_part 1
PDF
Well integrity lifecycle Santos
PDF
#9/9 Regional compliance monitoring
PPTX
Overliner or Landfill Mining?
PDF
Alnes et al gravity and subsidence monitoring
PDF
Sean McFadyen
PDF
Corporate Presentation
PDF
Swana md biosolid trials pettigrew
PDF
Rosemont Project Hydrogeology & Water Supply
PDF
Microsoft Word - Georgie Scott
PDF
Presentation
PPTX
2010 2012-groundwater-plume
PPTX
Anisotropic hydraulic conductivity of jointed rocks analytical and numerical ...
PPTX
Active landfill
PDF
What is a Solar Energy Landfill Cover System
PDF
Aoc sediment update_part2
PDF
Investor Presentation | Mutiny Gold (ASX:MYG) | Gold Investment Symposium 2014
PPT
Mp ground water
PPT
Stormwater GreenHomeNYC August 2008
H&L Remediation 2011
Aoc sediment update_part 1
Well integrity lifecycle Santos
#9/9 Regional compliance monitoring
Overliner or Landfill Mining?
Alnes et al gravity and subsidence monitoring
Sean McFadyen
Corporate Presentation
Swana md biosolid trials pettigrew
Rosemont Project Hydrogeology & Water Supply
Microsoft Word - Georgie Scott
Presentation
2010 2012-groundwater-plume
Anisotropic hydraulic conductivity of jointed rocks analytical and numerical ...
Active landfill
What is a Solar Energy Landfill Cover System
Aoc sediment update_part2
Investor Presentation | Mutiny Gold (ASX:MYG) | Gold Investment Symposium 2014
Mp ground water
Stormwater GreenHomeNYC August 2008
Ad

2013 AcuityES Case Study

  • 1. In-Situ Remediation of Hexavalent Chromium, Antimony and Nickel with Sub-Micron (Nano)-Scale Ferrous Sulfide Slurry Jim V. Rouse, Richard H. Christensen, PhD LPG, & Steven R. Irvin µg/L (AcuityES, Fishers, IN) © AcuityES 2013
  • 2. Acuity Environmental Solutions  Company’s Primary Focus: • Environmental Liability Consulting (how to manage liabilities) • Site Investigation – Soil, Groundwater, Air • Remediation of contaminated Sites • Expert Witness Testimony  Company’s Secondary Focus: • Environmental Permitting – Air, Water, Waste • Environmental Compliance © AcuityES 2013
  • 3. In-Situ Remediation of Hexavalent Chromium, Antimony and Nickel with Nano-Scale Ferrous Sulfide Slurry  Presented At: • International Seminar on Remediation and Redevelopment of Contaminated Sites, Sao Paulo, Brazil • AEHS West Coast Conference, San Diego, CA • USEPA’s Sustainable Remediation International Conference, Amherst, MA • AWPA National Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL & Nashville, TN • Midwest States Environmental Consulting Assoc., Indianapolis, IN • Battelle Conference, Monterey, California © AcuityES 2013
  • 4. Case Study In… In Situ Geochemical Reduction Stabilization (i.e., immobilizing) of metal constituents by chemically reducing the metals of concern to less soluble forms through the manipulation of geochemical factors such as: • pH • Oxidation potential (Eh or ORP) • Complexation • Sorption • Ion exchange Resulting in the elimination of metallic contaminants by: • Precipitation • Dissolution • Oxidation • Complexation © AcuityES 2013
  • 5. Key Project Considerations Competitor’s Proposals for Project included: • Off-site disposal of hazardous soils • 15 - 20 year pump and treat remedy for groundwater • >$8 Million Note: original estimates based on >50% smaller source area Our Solution: • In Situ remediation of impacted soils and groundwater • Goal: 2 year total remedy - 1/8th the time - • Cost: $4.5 Million - Nearly 50% below competitor’s bids - © AcuityES 2013
  • 6. Chrome Plating Gone Wild! © AcuityES 2013
  • 7. First things first… Segregation of Waste for Disposal Interior Building Decontamination Building Demolition © AcuityES 2013
  • 8. First things first… Groundwater Sampling Soil Boring & Well Installation Soil Sampling © AcuityES 2013
  • 9. Site Location -- Muncie, IN GW Impacts Source Areas © AcuityES 2013
  • 10. Site Plan for X-Section Line Site Conditions A’ First investigation – 2005 AcuityES - 2009 A © AcuityES 2013
  • 11. Geologic X-Section FORMER BASEMENT SOURCE AREA © AcuityES 2013
  • 12. Hydrogeology Unconfined Aquifer Clay to 15 feet (w/stringers) Sands & fine gravels Static Water at 15’ bgl Saturated thickness 5’ in SE to > 25’ in NW © AcuityES 2013
  • 13. Soil Impacts 7,900 mg/Kg maximum Cr+6 3,600 mg/Kg Cr+6 at 12’ bgl State Cleanup Goal - 38 mg/Kg • Two Adjacent Source Areas • 5,400 cubic yards of impact • Perched water sand stringers © AcuityES 2013
  • 14. Groundwater Impacts On-Site Cr+6 800,000 µg/L 9,700,000 µg/L Groundwater COCs 66,000 sq ft (320 ft long) Plume Cr+6, Sb, As, and Ni Offsite Cr+6 at 58,800 µg/L State Cleanup Goal- 100 µg/L Cr+6 © AcuityES 2013
  • 15. In Situ Chemical Reduction BENCH TESTED CHEMICALS REDUCTANTS •Ferrous Sulfate : FeSO4·7H2O •Sodium Thiosulfate : Na2S2O3 •Ferrous Sulfide : FeS •Sodium Metabisulfite : Na2S2O5 •Calcium Polysulfide (CPS) : CaSx •Sodium Sulfite : Na2SO3 •Zero Valent Iron © AcuityES 2013
  • 16. Selected Ferrous Sulfide (FeS) FeS, Hybrid Form (aka precipitated pyrite) Liquid suspension of 7% FeS FeS, hybrid - With additional 2% free Sulfide to simulate CaSx Nanoscale: 98% crystals <5 microns Cationic (Iron) 4 H2O + Cr042- + 3 Fe2- + 4 OH-  3 Fe(OH)3+ Cr(OH)3 (Solid) Anionic (sulfide) 17 H2O + 8 Cr042- + 3 HS-  3 S + 8 Cr(OH)3 (Solid) + 12 OH- © AcuityES 2013
  • 17. In Situ Soil Blending GPS Grid Network – 10’ x 10’ (100’ x 70’ to 15’) & Shallow to 5’ Dual Axis Blender – 15’ Plunge Total Area – 130’ x 110’ Computerized Dosing © AcuityES 2013
  • 18. In Situ Soil Blending Dual Axis Blender FeS injection/mixing © AcuityES 2013
  • 19. In Situ Soil Blending Thorough Mixing to 15’ BGL © AcuityES 2013
  • 20. In Situ Soil Blending Completed in 2 weeks Total FeS = 78,300 gallons Subsequent stabilization with aglime required © AcuityES 2013
  • 21. Confirmation Sampling © AcuityES 2013
  • 22. Groundwater Injections – FeS THE NUMBERS 155 Inject Pts 15 ft ROI 6 wks complete © AcuityES 2013
  • 23. Groundwater Injections Difficult Injections Boulder Fields 6’ caliche (calcified silt) Lodgement till © AcuityES 2013
  • 24. Groundwater Injections FeS Injection Totes 35,385 gallons injected Rotosonic Drilling Top Down Injection – 5ft intervals © AcuityES 2013
  • 25. Groundwater Injections Sensitivity to the Community Required Residential Hours © AcuityES 2013
  • 26. Preferential Flow Paths 15 – 20’ bgl Sand Unit © AcuityES 2013
  • 27. Preferential Flow Paths 20 - 25’ bgl Sand Unit © AcuityES 2013
  • 28. Pre-Treatment Cr +6 State Cleanup Goal of 100 µg/L © AcuityES 2013
  • 29. FeS Reductant Injection © AcuityES 2013
  • 30. 1 st Q Post-Treatment Cr +6 © AcuityES 2013
  • 31. 2 nd Q Post-Treatment Cr +6 © AcuityES 2013
  • 32. 3 rd Q Post-Treatment Cr +6 © AcuityES 2013
  • 33. 1 st Supplemental Injection © AcuityES 2013
  • 34. 4 th Q Post-Treatment Cr +6 © AcuityES 2013
  • 35. 5 th Q Post-Treatment Cr +6 © AcuityES 2013
  • 36. 6 th Q Post-Treatment Cr +6 © AcuityES 2013
  • 37. 7 th Q Post-Treatment Cr +6 © AcuityES 2013
  • 38. 2 nd Supplemental Injection © AcuityES 2013
  • 39. 8 th – 10 th Q Post-Treatment Cr +6 © AcuityES 2013
  • 40. Antimony Treatment Antimony Concentrations: Detected in 25 monitoring wells on-Site up to 30,000 µg/L off-Site up to 4,700 µg/L State Industrial Cleanup level - 41 µg/L State Residential Cleanup Level - 6 µg/L Goal for Antimony: Fixate onto Goethite (FeO(OH)) or Precipitate as stibnite (Sb2S3) © AcuityES 2013
  • 41. Pre-Treatment Antimony State Cleanup Goal of 6 µg/L © AcuityES 2013
  • 42. FeS Reductant Injection © AcuityES 2013
  • 43. 1 st Q Post-Treatment Antimony © AcuityES 2013
  • 44. 2 nd Q Post-Treatment Antimony © AcuityES 2013
  • 45. 3 rd Q Post-Treatment Antimony © AcuityES 2013
  • 46. 1 st Supplemental Injection © AcuityES 2013
  • 47. 4 th - 10 th Q Post-Treatment Antimony All results less than method detection level of 6 µg/L © AcuityES 2013
  • 48. Nickel Treatment Nickel Concentrations Detected in 10 wells exceeding cleanup levels off-Site up to 4,100 µg/L on-Site up to 50,000 µg/L State Industrial Cleanup level – 2,000 µg/L State Residential Cleanup Level - 730 µg/L Goal for Nickel: Fixate as: westerveldite ([FeNiCo]As) or pentlandite (FeNiS) © AcuityES 2013
  • 49. Pre-Treatment Nickel State Cleanup Goal of 730 µg/L © AcuityES 2013
  • 50. FeS Reductant Injection © AcuityES 2013
  • 51. 1st Q Post-Treatment Nickel All results less than method detection level of 50 µg/L No subsequent detections © AcuityES 2013
  • 52. Arsenic Arsenic – Pre-treatment As detected in 13 wells @ concentrations of 11 µg/L to 360 µg/L 10th Quarter Sampling results: only 2 wells @ 11 & 12 µg/L Goal for Arsenic Fixate as: orpiment (As2S3) or arsenopyrite (FeAsS) © AcuityES 2013
  • 53. The Site Today © AcuityES 2013
  • 54. ISCR Benefits 1. In situ soil blending eliminated need for off-Site hazardous waste disposal. (> 10,000 Tons) 2. In situ groundwater geochemical reduction eliminated need for prolonged pump and treat. 3. In situ geochemical reduction reduced time period of remediation from > 15 years to about 2 years. © AcuityES 2013
  • 55. CONTACT Richard H. Christensen, PhD, LPG – rchristensen@acuityes.com Steven R. Irvin – Irvin@acuityes.com Jim V. Rouse – jrouse@acuityes.com 317-570-4919 Past Teaming Partners CDM Smith Mundell & Associates Burns & McDonnell CALIBRE Professional Engineers MWH Global Malcom Pirnie Carndo MMA www.acuityes.com © AcuityES 2013