2015 yeq4results.16feb2016.vfinal

Full Year and Q4 2015 earnings
February 18, 2016

Newmont Mining Corporation I Q4 and FY 2015 earnings I Slide 2February 18, 2016
Cautionary statement
Cautionary statement regarding forward looking statements:
This presentation contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provided for under
such sections. Such forward-looking statements may include, without limitation: (i) estimates of future consolidated and attributable
production and sales; (ii) estimates of future costs applicable to sales and All-in sustaining costs; (iii) estimates of future consolidated and
attributable capital expenditures; (iv) our efforts to continue delivering reduced costs and efficiency; (v) expectations regarding the
development, growth and exploration potential of the Company’s operations and projects; (vi) expectations regarding the repayment of
debt; (vii) expectations regarding future dividends; and (viii) expectations regarding future price assumptions, financial performance and
other outlook or guidance. Estimates or expectations of future events or results are based upon certain assumptions, which may prove to
be incorrect. Such assumptions, include, but are not limited to: (i) there being no significant change to current geotechnical, metallurgical,
hydrological and other physical conditions; (ii) permitting, development, operations and expansion of the Company’s operations and
projects being consistent with current expectations and mine plans, including without limitation receipt of export approvals; (iii) political
developments in any jurisdiction in which the Company operates being consistent with its current expectations; (iv) certain exchange rate
assumptions for the Australian dollar to the U.S. dollar, as well as other the exchange rates being approximately consistent with current
levels; (v) certain price assumptions for gold, copper and oil; (vi) prices for key supplies being approximately consistent with current levels;
(vii) the accuracy of our current mineral reserve and mineralized material estimates; (viii) the acceptable outcome of negotiation of the
amendment to the Contract of Work and/or resolution of export issues in Indonesia (ix) there being no significant acquisitions or
divestitures during the outlook period and; (x) other assumptions noted herein. Where the Company expresses an expectation or belief as
to future events or results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. However, such
statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results
expressed, projected or implied by the “forward-looking statements”. Such risks include, but are not limited to, gold and other metals price
volatility, currency fluctuations, increased production costs and variances in ore grade or recovery rates from those assumed in mining
plans, political and operational risks, community relations, conflict resolution and outcome of projects or oppositions and governmental
regulation and judicial outcomes. For a more detailed discussion of such risks and other factors, see the Company’s 2015 Annual Report
on Form 10-K, filed on or about February 17, 2016, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), as well as the Company’s
other SEC filings. The Company does not undertake any obligation to release publicly revisions to any “forward-looking statement,”
including, without limitation, outlook, to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this presentation, or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events, except as may be required under applicable securities laws. Investors should not assume that any lack of update to
a previously issued “forward-looking statement” constitutes a reaffirmation of that statement. Continued reliance on “forward-looking
statements” is at investors' own risk.

Continued to deliver strategy in 2015
Twin Creeks
Improve the
underlying
business
Lowered injury rates by 18%
Reduced AISC1 by 10% to $898/oz
Increased gold production by 4% to 5.0 Moz (attributable)
Strengthen
the portfolio
Acquired Cripple Creek & Victor and sold non-core assets for fair value
Progressed five profitable growth projects on time and on budget
Added 9.0 Moz of Reserves through exploration and acquisition
Create value
for
shareholders
Increased EBITDA2 by 29% to $2.7B
More than doubled free cash flow3 to $756M
Lowered net debt by 19% and maintained competitive dividends
Cripple Creek & Victor

Sustainability performance supports long-term value
0.65
0.47
0.39
0.32
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
2012 2013 2014 2015
Injury rates (total recordable injuries per 200,000 hours worked)
Down ~50% since 2012
Mining industry leader
• Overall sustainability
• Climate strategy
• Labor practices
• Human rights
• Corporate citizenship
• Environmental management systems

Operational performance drives AISC below $900/oz
Gold all-in sustaining cost ($/ounce)
$1,177
$1,113
$1,002
$898
$600
$700
$800
$900
$1,000
$1,100
$1,200
$1,300
2012 2013 2014 2015
Down 24% since 2012

Portfolio optimization improves value and risk profile
Divested Reinvested
Assets
Midas, Jundee,
Penmont, Waihi
Merian, Long
Canyon, CC&V
Mine life Less than 6 years More than 10 years
Production 500Koz/year ~1Moz/year
Costs $900 – $950/oz Below $800/oz
Risk
Higher technical
and social risk
Lower technical
and social risk
AISC down 19%
Mine life up 66%
*Production and cost data represent expected weighted average calculation based on 5-year outlook estimates

Maximizing opportunities and managing risks
North America
• Turf Vent Shaft delivered below budget;
Long Canyon, CC&V expansion on course
• Ground control at Leeville progressing
South America
• Merian ~2/3 complete and below budget
• Conga Reserves moved to Resource
Africa
• Investment Agreement, mining lease ratified
• Permanent generators commissioned
Asia Pacific
• Tanami expansion on course
• Batu Hijau export permit granted
Long Canyon

Financial results – Laurie Brlas

Sixth consecutive quarter of AISC below $1,000/oz
Q4 2015 Q4 2014 FY 2015 FY 2014
Average Realized Gold Price, Net ($/oz) $1,084 $1,194 $1,141 $1,258
Average Realized Copper Price, Net ($/lb) $1.86 $2.55 $2.13 $2.65
Attributable Gold Production (Koz) 1,246 1,261 5,035 4,845
Gold CAS ($/oz) $680 $631 $633 $706
Gold AISC ($/oz) $999 $927 $898 $1,002
Gold CAS down
10%
Gold AISC down
10%
Gold production up
4%
*Arrows depict FY 2015 performance versus FY 2014 performance

Q4 2015 Q4 2014 FY 2015 FY 2014
Revenue ($M) $1,816 $2,017 $7,729 $7,292
Adjusted Net Income4 ($M) $20 $86 $507 $545
Adjusted Net Income ($ per share) $0.04 $0.17 $0.98 $1.09
Adjusted EBITDA ($M) $466 $652 $2,732 $2,125
Cash from Continuing Operations ($M) $275 $562 $2,157 $1,451
Free Cash Flow ($M) $(185) $218 $756 $341
Dividends ($ per share) $0.025 $0.025 $0.100 $0.225
Free cash flow more than double prior year
Adjusted EBITDA up
29%
Free cash flow up
122%
*Arrows depict FY 2015 performance versus FY 2014 performance
Revenue up
6%

Adjusted EBITDA ($M)
$228
$145 $27
$66
$466
$0.00
$50.00
$100.00
$150.00
$200.00
$250.00
$300.00
$350.00
$400.00
$450.00
$500.00
EBITDA Reclamation
charge
Ghana Investment
Agreement
Impairments,
restructuring &
other
Adjusted EBITDA
($0.48) $0.25
$0.18
$0.03 $0.06 $0.04
-$0.60
-$0.50
-$0.40
-$0.30
-$0.20
-$0.10
$0.00
$0.10
Net income
attributable
to NEM
stockholders Tax adjustments
Reclamation
charge
Ghana Investment
Agreement
Impairments,
restructuring and
other
Adjusted net
income
Strong adjusted EBITDA for the quarter
GAAP to adjusted net income ($/share)

Available
cash
Executing capital priorities
$52M
in dividends
$454M
in debt repayment
$655M
to fund projects
$1.4B5
cash from
core
operations
~$200M
Net cash from
divestitures
$2.8B
Ending cash
balance
*All figures as of fiscal year ended December 31, 2015

0.5x
1.0x
1.5x
2.0x
2.5x
3.0x
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2013 2014 2015
Industry leading net debt to EBITDA
Net debt to EBITDA*
Newmont Competitor average
*Competitors include Barrick, Goldcorp, AngloGold Ashanti, Agnico Eagle, IAMGOLD, Newcrest and Yamana; net debt to EBITDA utilizes trailing 12-month adjusted EBITDA. Competitor
average is weighted based on Total Enterprise Value (12/31/2015). All figures sourced from Capital IQ.

Raising performance to the next level in 2016
• Deliver safe and profitable production and maintain AISC below $1,000/oz
• Add higher margin ounces at Merian and CC&V and advance next projects in pipeline
• Generate leading return on capital, competitive dividends and continue lowering debt
• Maintain strong environmental, social and governance practices to lower risk
Merian

1,177
1,113
1,002
898
2012A 2013A 2014A 2015A 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E
AISC improvements are sustained
Consolidated gold all-in sustaining cost per ounce6 ($/oz)
900 – 960
850 – 950
900 – 1,000

5.0 5.1
4.8
5.0 4.5 – 5.0
2012A 2013A 2014A 2015A 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E
4.8 – 5.3
Attributable gold production (Moz)
Steady attributable gold production
5.2 – 5.7

$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
2012A 2013A 2014A 2015A 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E
Disciplined approach to capital expenditure
Consolidated capital expenditure ($M)
Sustaining capital Development capital
700 – 800
900 –
1,000
3,152
1,812
1,099
1,155 –
1,370
1,468

Strong pipeline drives steady value creation

82.2
6.5
0.8
3.0
6.5
0.7
5.0
4.0
73.7
Actual2014
Additions
Acquisitions
Depletion
Divestments
Price-related
changes
Congarevision
Otherrevisions
Actual2015
~63
~70 ~74 ~78 ~85
$1,000 $1,100 $1,200 $1,300 $1,400
Sensitivity to gold price (Moz)
2015 attributable gold Reserves (Moz)
Exploration and acquisition add ~9Moz to Reserves
*Figures subject to rounding; divestments include Regis and La Zanja equity reserves, which were removed from reported reserves

0
25
50
75
100
2014
2015E
2016E
2017E
2018E
2019E
2020E
Gold sector fundamentals improving
*Sourced from SNL Mineral Economics Group (2013), GFMS Mine Economics Database (2016)
0
25
50
75
100
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
3-year average gold discovered (Moz) Gold mine supply (Moz)
Operations Projects

Prepared for opportunities and challenges
Current gold price
• Optimize costs & capital
• Finish current projects;
progress best return
projects
• Near-mine, high value
exploration focus
• Reduce support costs
across business
• Evaluate early debt
repayment
• Pay dividend at Board’s
discretion
Downside
• Reduce stripping and
increase stockpile
processing
• Complete current
projects
• Mothball lowest margin
operations
• Reduce exploration
• Discontinue early debt
repayments
• Reevaluate dividend
Upside
• Maintain cost and capital
discipline
• Pursue value-accretive
growth
• Follow up on most
promising exploration
prospects
• Accelerate debt
repayment
• Pay higher dividends in
line with policy

Where are we today? Where are we heading?
Safety Industry leading performance Zero injuries and illnesses
Sustainability Industry leading performance Improved country risk profile
Costs AISC down 10% in 2015 Ongoing savings to offset inflation
Portfolio ~$200M net non-core asset sales Superior value and risk profile
Production Steady production Highest value ounces
Free Cash Flow FCF doubled in 2015 Self-fund projects and dividends
Returns Maximize risk-adjusted returns Maintain first quartile TSR
Balance sheet Net debt down 19% in 2015 Superior financial flexibility
Focused on long-term value creation

a2016 Outlook in the table above are considered “forward-looking
statements” and are based upon certain assumptions, including,
but not limited to, metal prices, oil prices, certain exchange rates
and other assumptions. For example, 2016 Outlook assumes
$1,100/oz Au, $2.50/lb Cu, $0.75 USD/AUD exchange rate and
$65/barrel WTI. AISC and CAS cost estimates do not include
inflation. Production, AISC and capital estimates exclude projects
that have not yet been approved (NW Exodus, Twin Underground,
Batu Phase 7, Ahafo Mill Expansion, Subika Underground and
Apensu Deeps). The potential impact on inventory valuation as a
result of lower prices, input costs, and project decisions are not
included as part of this Outlook. Such assumptions may prove to
be incorrect and actual results may differ materially from those
anticipated. See cautionary note on slide 2.
bAll-in sustaining costs as used in the Company’s Outlook is a
non-GAAP metric defined as the sum of cost applicable to sales
(including all direct and indirect costs related to current gold
production incurred to execute on the current mine plan),
remediation costs (including operating accretion and amortization
of asset retirement costs), G&A, exploration expense, advanced
projects and R&D, treatment and refining costs, other expense,
net of one-time adjustments and sustaining capital.
cIncludes Lone Tree operations.
dIncludes TRJV operations.
eConsolidated production for Yanacocha is presented on a total
production basis for the mine site; attributable production
represents a 51.35% interest.
fBoth consolidated and attributable production are shown on a
pro-rata basis with a 50% ownership for Kalgoorlie.
gProduction outlook does not include equity production from
stakes in TMAC (29.4%), La Zanja (46.94%) and Regis (19.45%).
hConsolidated production for Batu Hijau is presented on a total
production basis for the mine site; whereas attributable production
represents a 48.5% ownership interest in 2016 outlook. Outlook
for Batu Hijau remains subject to various factors, including,
without limitation, renegotiation of the CoW, issuance of future
export approvals, negotiations with the labor union, future in-
country smelting availability and regulations relating to export
quotas, and certain other factors.
iConsolidated expense outlook is adjusted to exclude
extraordinary items. For example, the tax rate outlook above is a
consolidated adjusted rate, which assumes the exclusion of
certain tax valuation allowance adjustments. Beginning in 2016,
regional general and administrative expense is included in total
general and administrative expense (G&A) and community
development cost is included in CAS.
2016 Outlooka

Adjusted net income
Adjusted net income (loss)
Management of the Company uses Adjusted net income (loss) to evaluate the Company’s operating
performance, and for planning and forecasting future business operations. The Company believes the
use of Adjusted net income (loss) allows investors and analysts to understand the results of the
continuing operations of the Company and its direct and indirect subsidiaries relating to the production
and sale of minerals, by excluding certain items that have a disproportionate impact on our results for a
particular period. The net income (loss) adjustments are presented net of tax generally at Company’s
statutory effective tax rate of 35% and net of our partners’ noncontrolling interests when applicable. The
corollary impact of the adjustments through the Company’s Valuation allowance is shown separately.
The tax valuation allowance adjustment includes items such as foreign tax credits, alternative minimum
tax credits, capital losses and disallowed foreign losses. Management’s determination of the
components of Adjusted net income (loss) are evaluated periodically and based, in part, on a review of
non-GAAP financial measures used by mining industry analysts.

(1) Loss (income) from discontinued
operations is presented net of tax $(4), $(11),
$11 and $(18) expense (benefit),
respectively.
(2) Impairment of investments is presented
net of tax $(5), $(5), $(41) and $(6) expense
(benefit), respectively.
(3) Impairment of long-lived assets is
presented net of tax $(18), $(-), $(20) and
$(6) expense (benefit), respectively and
amounts attributed to noncontrolling interest
income (expense) of $(14), $(6), $(14) and
$(9), respectively.
(4) Restructuring and other is presented net
of tax $(3), $(2), $(12) and $(13) expense
(benefit), respectively and amounts attributed
to noncontrolling interest income (expense)
of $(2), $(3), $(5) and $(6), respectively.
(5) Acquisition costs are presented net of tax
$(2), $-, $(7) and $- expense (benefit),
respectively.
(6) Loss (gain) on asset and investment sales
are presented net of tax $3, $11, $49 and
$72 expense (benefit), respectively.
(7) Gain on deconsolidation of TMAC is
presented net of tax $-, $-, $27, and $-
expense (benefit), respectively.
(8) Reclamation charges are presented net of
tax $(51), $(5), $(51) and $(5) expense
(benefit), respectively.
(9) Ghana investment agreement is
presented net of tax $(9), $-, $(9) and $-
expense (benefit), respectively.
(10) Abnormal production cost at Batu Hijau
is presented net of tax $-, $-, $- and $32
expense (benefit), respectively and amounts
attributed to noncontrolling interest income
(expense) of $-, $-, $- and $30, respectively.
(11) Tax adjustments include movements in
tax valuation allowance and tax adjustments
not related to current period earnings.
Adjusted net income
Three Months Ended Years Ended
December 31, December 31,
2015 2014 2015 2014
Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders $ (254) $ 15 $ 220 $ 508
Loss (income) from discontinued operations (1) 7 24 (27) 40
Impairment of investments (2) 8 10 74 15
Impairment of long-lived assets (3) 18 4 22 11
Restructuring and other (4) 3 3 17 21
Acquisition costs (5) 2 — 12 —
Loss (gain) on asset and investment sales (6) (6) (23) (69) (54)
Gain on deconsolidation of TMAC (7) — — (49) —
Reclamation charges (8) 94 10 94 10
Ghana Investment Agreement (9) 18 — 18 —
Abnormal production costs at Batu Hijau (10) — — — 28
Tax adjustments (11) 130 43 195 (34)
Adjusted net income (loss) $ 20 $ 86 $ 507 $ 545
Net income (loss) per share, basic $ (0.48) $ 0.03 $ 0.43 $ 1.02
Loss (income) from discontinued operations, net of taxes 0.01 0.05 (0.05) 0.08
Impairment of investments, net of taxes 0.02 0.02 0.14 0.03
Impairment of long-lived assets, net of taxes 0.03 0.01 0.04 0.02
Restructuring and other, net of taxes 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.04
Acquisition costs, net of taxes — — 0.02 —
Loss (gain) on asset and investment sales, net of taxes (0.01) (0.05) (0.13) (0.11)
Gain on deconsolidation of TMAC, net of taxes — — (0.09) —
Reclamation charges, net of taxes 0.18 0.02 0.18 0.02
Ghana Investment Agreement, net of taxes 0.03 — 0.03 —
Abnormal production costs at Batu Hijau, net of taxes — — — 0.06
Tax adjustments 0.25 0.08 0.38 (0.07)
Adjusted net income (loss) per share, basic $ 0.04 $ 0.17 $ 0.98 $ 1.09
Net income (loss) per share, diluted $ (0.48) $ 0.03 $ 0.43 $ 1.02
Loss (income) from discontinued operations, net of taxes 0.01 0.05 (0.05) 0.08
Impairment of investments, net of taxes 0.02 0.02 0.14 0.03
Impairment of long-lived assets, net of taxes 0.03 0.01 0.04 0.02
Restructuring and other, net of taxes 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.04
Acquisition costs, net of taxes — — 0.02 —
Loss (gain) on asset and investment sales, net of taxes (0.01) (0.05) (0.13) (0.11)
Gain on deconsolidation of TMAC, net of taxes — — (0.09) —
Reclamation charges, net of taxes 0.18 0.02 0.18 0.02
Ghana Investment Agreement, net of taxes 0.03 — 0.03 —
Abnormal production costs at Batu Hijau, net of taxes — — — 0.06
Tax adjustments 0.25 0.08 0.38 (0.07)
Adjusted net income (loss) per share, diluted $ 0.04 $ 0.17 $ 0.98 $ 1.09

Adjusted EBITDA
We also present adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (Adjusted EBITDA) as a
non-GAAP measure. Management of the Company uses EBITDA and EBITDA adjusted for non-core or certain
items that have a disproportionate impact on our results for a particular period (Adjusted EBITDA) as non-GAAP
measures to evaluate the Company’s operating performance. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent, and
should not be considered an alternative to, net earnings (loss), operating earnings (loss), or cash flow from
operations as those terms are defined by GAAP, and does not necessarily indicate whether cash flows will be
sufficient to fund cash needs. Although Adjusted EBITDA and similar measures are frequently used as measures of
operations and the ability to meet debt service requirements by other companies, our calculation of Adjusted
EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to such other similarly titled captions of other companies. The Company
believes that Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating
our operating results in the same manner as our management and board of directors. Management’s determination
of the components of Adjusted EBITDA are evaluated periodically and based, in part, on a review of non-GAAP
financial measures used by mining industry analysts. Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders is
reconciled to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as follows: Three Months Ended Years Ended
2015 2014 2015 2014
Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders $ (254) $ 15 $ 220 $ 508
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests (104) 46 84 (179)
Loss (income) from discontinued operations 7 24 (27) 40
Equity loss (income) of affiliates 11 6 45 4
Income and mining tax expense (benefit) 148 155 644 133
Depreciation and amortization 343 307 1,239 1,229
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest 77 85 325 361
EBITDA $ 228 $ 638 $ 2,530 $ 2,096
Adjustments:
Impairment of investments $ 13 $ 15 $ 115 $ 21
Impairment of long-lived assets 50 10 56 26
Restructuring and other 8 8 34 40
Acquisitions costs 4 — 19 —
Gain on deconsolidation of TMAC — — (76) —
Loss (gain) on asset and investment sales (9) (34) (118) (126)
Abnormal production costs at Batu Hijau — — — 53
Ghana Investment Agreement 27 — 27 —
Reclamation charges 145 15 145 15
Adjusted EBITDA $ 466 $ 652 $ 2,732 $ 2,125

We also present Cash from core operations as a non-GAAP measure. Cash from core operations is generated from
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities less sustaining capital, as presented on the non-GAAP All-in
sustaining cost table in the Company’s Q4 and FY 2015 earnings release filed on February 17, 2016.
Cash from core operations
Three Months Ended Years Ended
2015 2014 2015 2014
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 272 $ 559 $ 2,145 $ 1,438
Plus: Net cash used in discontinued operations 3 3 12 13
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities 275 562 2,157 1,451
Less: Sustaining capital (248) (233) (746) (810)
Cash from core operations $ 27 $ 329 $ 1,411 $ 641
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (1) $ (389) $ 85 $ (2,041) $ (507)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities $ (65) $ (12) $ 296 $ (65)
(1) Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities include sustaining capital, which is included in the Company’s computation of Cash from core operations.

All-in sustaining costs
Newmont has worked to develop a metric that expands on GAAP measures such as cost of goods sold and non-GAAP measures, such as costs applicable to sales per ounce, to provide visibility into the
economics of our mining operations related to expenditures, operating performance and the ability to generate cash flow from operations.
Current GAAP-measures used in the mining industry, such as cost of goods sold, do not capture all of the expenditures incurred to discover, develop, and sustain gold production. Therefore, we believe that all-in
sustaining costs is a non-GAAP measure that provides additional information to management, investors, and analysts that aid in the understanding of the economics of our operations and performance compared
to other producers and in the investor’s visibility by better defining the total costs associated with production.
All-in sustaining cost (AISC) amounts are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as a
substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under GAAP. Other
companies may calculate these measures differently as a result of differences in the underlying accounting principles, policies applied and in accounting frameworks such as in International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS), or by reflecting the benefit from selling non-gold metals as a reduction to AISC. Differences may also arise related to definitional differences of sustaining versus development capital activities
based upon each company’s internal policies.
The following disclosure provides information regarding the adjustments made in determining the all-in sustaining costs measure:
Cost Applicable to Sales - Includes all direct and indirect costs related to current gold production incurred to execute the current mine plan. Costs Applicable to Sales (CAS) includes by-product credits from
certain metals obtained during the process of extracting and processing the primary ore-body. CAS is accounted for on an accrual basis and excludes Amortization and Reclamation and remediation, which is
consistent with our presentation of CAS on the Statement of Consolidated Income. In determining AISC, only the CAS associated with producing and selling an ounce of gold is included in the measure.
Therefore, the amount of gold CAS included in AISC is derived from the CAS presented in the Company’s Statement of Consolidated Income less the amount of CAS attributable to the production of copper at our
Phoenix, Boddington and Batu Hijau mines. The copper CAS at those mine sites is disclosed in Note 3 – Segments that accompanies the Consolidated Financial Statements. The allocation of CAS between gold
and copper at the Phoenix, Boddington and Batu Hijau mines is based upon the relative sales percentage of copper and gold sold during the period.
Remediation Costs - Includes accretion expense related to asset retirement obligations (ARO) and the amortization of the related Asset Retirement Cost (ARC) for the Company’s operating properties recorded as
an ARC asset. Accretion related to ARO and the amortization of the ARC assets for reclamation and remediation do not reflect annual cash outflows but are calculated in accordance with GAAP. The accretion
and amortization reflect the periodic costs of reclamation and remediation associated with current gold production and are therefore included in the measure. The allocation of these costs to gold and copper is
determined using the same allocation used in the allocation of CAS between gold and copper at the Phoenix, Boddington and Batu Hijau mines.
Advanced Projects and Exploration - Includes incurred expenses related to projects that are designed to increase or enhance current gold production and gold exploration. We note that as current resources are
depleted, exploration and advance projects are necessary for us to replace the depleting reserves or enhance the recovery and processing of the current reserves. As this relates to sustaining our gold production,
and is considered a continuing cost of a mining company, these costs are included in the AISC measure. These costs are derived from the Advanced projects, research and development and Exploration amounts
presented in the Company’s Statement of Consolidated Income less the amount attributable to the production of copper at our Phoenix, Boddington and Batu Hijau mines. The allocation of these costs to gold and
copper is determined using the same allocation used in the allocation of CAS between gold and copper at the Batu Hijau, Boddington and Phoenix mines.
General and Administrative - Includes cost related to administrative tasks not directly related to current gold production, but rather related to support our corporate structure and fulfilling our obligations to operate
as a public company. Including these expenses in the AISC metric provides visibility of the impact that general and administrative activities have on current operations and profitability on a per ounce basis.
Other Expense, net - Includes costs related to regional administration and community development to support current gold production. We exclude certain exceptional or unusual expenses from Other expense,
net, such as restructuring, as these are not indicative to sustaining our current gold operations. Furthermore, this adjustment to Other expense, net is also consistent with the nature of the adjustments made to
Net income (loss) as disclosed in the Company’s non-GAAP financial measure Adjusted net income (loss). The allocation of these costs to gold and copper is determined using the same allocation used in the
allocation of CAS between gold and copper at the Phoenix, Boddington and Batu Hijau mines.
Treatment and Refining Costs - Includes costs paid to smelters for treatment and refining of our concentrates to produce the salable metal. These costs are presented net as a reduction of Sales.
Sustaining Capital - We determined sustaining capital as those capital expenditures that are necessary to maintain current gold production and execute the current mine plan. Capital expenditures to develop new
operations, or related to projects at existing operations where these projects will enhance gold production or reserves, are considered development. We determined the breakout of sustaining and development
capital costs based on a systematic review of our project portfolio in light of the nature of each project. Sustaining capital costs are relevant to the AISC metric as these are needed to maintain the Company’s
current gold operations and provide improved transparency related to our ability to finance these expenditures from current operations. The allocation of these costs to gold and copper is determined using the
same allocation used in the allocation of CAS between gold and copper at the Batu Hijau, Boddington and Phoenix mines.

(1) Excludes Depreciation and
amortization and Reclamation and
remediation.
(2) Includes by-product credits of $15.
(3) Includes stockpile and leach pad
inventory adjustments of $30 at Carlin, $2
at Twin Creeks and $35 at Yanacocha.
(4) Remediation costs include operating
accretion of $19 and amortization of asset
retirement costs of $10.
(5) Other expense, net is adjusted for
restructuring costs of $8, Ghana
investment agreement payment of $27
and acquisition costs of $4.
(6) Excludes development capital
expenditures, capitalized interest, and the
increase in accrued capital of $212. The
following are major development projects:
Merian, Turf Vent Shaft, Long Canyon and
the CC&V expansion project.
(7) The Company acquired the CC&V gold
mining business on August 3, 2015.
(8) On October 29, 2015, the Company
sold the Waihi mine.
Advanced Treatment All-In
Costs Projects General Other and All-In Ounces Sustaining
Three Months Ended Applicable Remediation and and Expense, Refining Sustaining Sustaining (000)/Pounds Costs per
December 31, 2015 to Sales
(1)(2)(3)
Costs
(4)
Exploration Administrative Net
(5)
Costs Capital
(6)
Costs (millions) Sold oz/lb
GOLD
Carlin $ 216 $ 1 $ 4 $ — $ 2 $ — $ 64 $ 287 224 $ 1,281
Phoenix 42 — — — 1 2 3 48 45 1,067
Twin Creeks 56 1 1 — 2 — 10 70 107 654
CC&V (7)
34 1 2 — — — 6 43 49 878
Other North America — — 11 — (2) — 5 14 — —
North America 348 3 18 — 3 2 88 462 425 1,087
Yanacocha 155 24 15 — 6 — 38 238 217 1,097
Other South America — — 14 — 5 — — 19 — —
South America 155 24 29 — 11 — 38 257 217 1,184
Boddington 159 2 1 — — 6 13 181 231 784
Tanami 53 1 2 — 1 — 23 80 93 860
Waihi
(8)
6 — — — — — 1 7 13 538
Kalgoorlie 66 — 1 — 1 2 7 77 85 906
Batu Hijau 69 — 1 1 6 11 26 114 160 713
Other Asia Pacific — — 2 1 11 — 3 17 — —
Asia Pacific 353 3 7 2 19 19 73 476 582 818
Ahafo 56 2 8 — — — 17 83 81 1,025
Akyem 59 1 2 — 1 — 14 77 120 642
Other Africa — — — — 2 — — 2 — —
Africa 115 3 10 — 3 — 31 162 201 806
Corporate and Other — — 16 43 3 — 5 67 — —
Total Gold $ 971 $ 33 $ 80 $ 45 $ 39 $ 21 $ 235 $ 1,424 1,425 $ 999
COPPER
Phoenix $ 22 $ 1 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 2 $ 25 11 $ 2.27
Boddington 39 1 1 — — 5 3 49 25 1.96
Batu Hijau 109 4 — — 1 22 8 144 108 1.33
Asia Pacific 148 5 1 — 1 27 11 193 133 1.45
Total Copper $ 170 $ 6 $ 1 $ — $ 1 $ 27 $ 13 $ 218 144 $ 1.51
Consolidated $ 1,141 $ 39 $ 81 $ 45 $ 40 $ 48 $ 248 $ 1,642

remediation.
inventory adjustments of $32 at Carlin, $9
at Phoenix, $8 at Twin Creeks and $11 at
Yanacocha.
restructuring costs of $8.
Turf Vent Shaft, Merian, Correnso and
Conga for 2014.
(7) On July 1, 2014, the Company sold the
Jundee mine. On October 6, 2014, the
Company sold its 44% interest in La
Herradura. On October 29, 2015, the
Company sold the Waihi mine.
Three Months Ended Applicable Remediation and and Expense, Refining Sustaining Sustaining (000)/Pounds Costs per
December 31, 2014 to Sales (1)(2)(3)
Costs (4)
Exploration Administrative Net (5)
Costs Capital (6)
GOLD
Carlin $ 188 $ 1 $ 6 $ — $ 2 $ — $ 45 $ 242 232 $ 1,043
Phoenix 44 1 1 — 1 2 5 54 45 1,200
Twin Creeks 60 — 1 — 1 — 25 87 111 784
La Herradura (7)
3 — 2 — — — 2 7 3 2,333
Other North America — — 5 — (3) — 3 5 — —
North America 295 2 15 — 1 2 80 395 391 1,010
Yanacocha 133 21 8 — 11 — 24 197 326 604
Other South America — — 15 — — — — 15 — —
South America 133 21 23 — 11 — 24 212 326 650
Boddington 160 3 — — — 1 19 183 214 855
Tanami 66 — 1 — 1 — 35 103 94 1,096
Jundee
(7)
— — — — 1 — (1) — — —
Waihi (7)
18 2 4 — — — — 24 29 828
Kalgoorlie 71 1 1 — — 2 16 91 79 1,152
Batu Hijau 38 2 — — 1 5 1 47 48 979
Other Asia Pacific — — 2 3 — — — 5 — —
Asia Pacific 353 8 8 3 3 8 70 453 464 976
Ahafo 67 2 9 — 1 — 27 106 111 955
Akyem 52 1 — — 2 — 12 67 134 500
Other Africa — — 2 — 2 — — 4 — —
Africa 119 3 11 — 5 — 39 177 245 722
Total Gold $ 900 $ 34 $ 85 $ 47 $ 32 $ 10 $ 214 $ 1,322 1,426 $ 927
COPPER
Phoenix $ 27 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 1 $ 3 $ 31 11 $ 2.82
Boddington 46 — — — 1 8 6 61 21 2.90
Batu Hijau 156 5 1 1 3 26 10 202 91 2.22
Asia Pacific 202 5 1 1 4 34 16 263 112 2.35
Total Copper $ 229 $ 5 $ 1 $ 1 $ 4 $ 35 $ 19 $ 294 123 $ 2.39
Consolidated $ 1,129 $ 39 $ 86 $ 48 $ 36 $ 45 $ 233 $ 1,616

remediation.
inventory adjustments of $116 at Carlin,
$14 at Twin Creeks, $77 at Yanacocha
and $19 at Boddington.
restructuring and other costs of $34, the
Ghana investment agreement payment of
$27 and acquisition costs of $19.
Merian, Turf Vent Shaft, Long Canyon and
the CC&V expansion project.
(7) The Company acquired the CC&V gold
mining business on August 3, 2015
(8) On October 29, 2015, The Company
sold the Waihi mine.
Year Ended Applicable Remediation and and Expense, Refining Sustaining Sustaining (000)/Pounds Costs per
(1)(2)(3)
Costs
(4)
(5)
Costs Capital
(6)
GOLD
Carlin $ 788 $ 4 $ 16 $ — $ 9 $ — $ 188 $ 1,005 886 $ 1,134
Phoenix 163 4 2 — 3 8 15 195 199 980
Twin Creeks 246 4 8 — 4 — 47 309 473 653
CC&V
(7)
44 2 3 — — — 7 56 82 683
Other North America — — 30 — 3 — 8 41 — —
North America 1,241 14 59 — 19 8 265 1,606 1,640 979
Yanacocha 555 97 37 — 27 — 97 813 924 880
South America 555 97 83 — 33 — 97 865 924 936
Boddington 569 9 2 — 1 24 47 652 816 799
Tanami 223 3 7 — 3 — 78 314 434 724
Waihi (8)
54 2 3 — 1 — 3 63 116 543
Kalgoorlie 272 5 3 — 1 5 21 307 318 965
Batu Hijau 274 9 3 1 12 39 48 386 625 618
Asia Pacific 1,392 28 23 3 47 68 203 1,764 2,309 764
Ahafo 204 7 24 — 4 — 57 296 332 892
Akyem 205 6 8 — 7 — 44 270 472 572
Other Africa — — 2 — 9 — — 11 — —
Africa 409 13 34 — 20 — 101 577 804 718
Total Gold $ 3,597 $ 152 $ 283 $ 182 $ 131 $ 76 $ 676 $ 5,097 5,677 $ 898
COPPER
Phoenix $ 91 $ 3 $ 1 $ — $ 1 $ 3 $ 9 $ 108 47 $ 2.30
Boddington 140 2 1 — — 15 11 169 82 2.06
Batu Hijau 484 18 4 1 9 92 50 658 460 1.43
Asia Pacific 624 20 5 1 9 107 61 827 542 1.53
Total Copper $ 715 $ 23 $ 6 $ 1 $ 10 $ 110 $ 70 $ 935 589 $ 1.59
Consolidated $ 4,312 $ 175 $ 289 $ 183 $ 141 $ 186 $ 746 $ 6,032

remediation.
inventory adjustments of $127 at Carlin,
$13 at Phoenix, $15 at Twin Creeks, $75
at Yanacocha, $69 at Boddington and
$191 at Batu Hijau.
restructuring costs of $40.
decrease in accrued capital, totaling $300.
The following are major development
projects: Turf Vent Shaft, Merian,
Correnso and Conga.
(7) On July 1, 2014, the Company sold the
Jundee mine. On October 6, 2014, the
Company sold its 44% interest in La
Herradura. On October 29, 2015, the
Company sold the Waihi mine.
Year Ended Applicable Remediation and and Expense, Refining Sustaining Sustaining (000)/Pounds Costs per
(1)(2)(3)
Costs
(4)
(5)
Costs Capital
(6)
GOLD
Carlin $ 795 $ 4 $ 22 $ — $ 8 $ — $ 141 $ 970 905 $ 1,072
Phoenix 160 3 4 — 3 9 17 196 222 883
Twin Creeks 207 2 5 — 3 — 111 328 400 820
La Herradura
(7)
89 2 12 — — — 21 124 119 1,042
Other North America — — 25 — 6 — 9 40 — —
North America 1,251 11 68 — 20 9 299 1,658 1,646 1,007
Yanacocha 663 101 32 — 35 — 80 911 966 943
South America 663 101 73 — 37 — 80 954 966 988
Boddington 585 11 — — 2 4 69 671 690 972
Tanami 251 4 10 — 2 — 91 358 345 1,038
Jundee
(7)
85 5 1 — 2 — 15 108 140 771
Waihi
(7)
76 3 7 — 2 — 2 90 131 687
Kalgoorlie 284 4 5 — 1 4 32 330 327 1,009
Batu Hijau 81 3 — — 4 9 8 105 72 1,458
Asia Pacific 1,362 30 28 3 34 17 223 1,697 1,705 995
Ahafo 249 8 27 — 6 — 92 382 450 849
Akyem 172 3 — — 8 — 17 200 473 423
Other Africa — — 8 — 7 — — 15 — —
Africa 421 11 35 — 21 — 109 597 923 647
Total Gold $ 3,697 $ 153 $ 320 $ 185 $ 143 $ 26 $ 728 $ 5,252 5,240 $ 1,002
COPPER
Phoenix $ 108 $ 1 $ 2 $ — $ 1 $ 5 $ 13 $ 130 46 $ 2.83
Boddington 158 2 — — 1 25 18 204 66 3.09
Batu Hijau 494 15 3 1 20 45 51 629 152 4.14
Asia Pacific 652 17 3 1 21 70 69 833 218 3.82
Total Copper $ 760 $ 18 $ 5 $ 1 $ 22 $ 75 $ 82 $ 963 264 $ 3.65
Consolidated $ 4,457 $ 171 $ 325 $ 186 $ 165 $ 101 $ 810 $ 6,215

Endnotes
Investors are encouraged to read the information contained in this presentation in conjunction with the following notes, the Cautionary Statement on slide 2 and the factors described
under the “Risk Factors” section of the Company’s Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on or about February 17, 2016, and disclosure in the Company’s recent SEC filings.
1. Historical AISC or All-in sustaining cost is a non-GAAP metric. See slides 31 to 35 for more information and a reconciliation to the nearest GAAP metric. All-in sustaining cost
(“AISC”) as used in the Company’s Outlook is a non-GAAP metric defined as the sum of cost applicable to sales (including all direct and indirect costs related to current gold
production incurred to execute on the current mine plan), remediation costs (including operating accretion and amortization of asset retirement costs), G&A, exploration expense,
advanced projects and R&D, treatment and refining costs, other expense, net of one-time adjustments and sustaining capital. See also note 6 below.
2. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP metric. See slide 29 for more information and reconciliation to the nearest GAAP metric.
3. Free cash flow is a non-GAAP metric and is generated from Net cash provided from continuing operations less Additions to property, plant and mine development, as presented
on the Statement of Cash Flows in the Company’s Q4 and FY 2015 earnings release filed on February 17, 2016.
4. Adj. Net Income is a non-GAAP metric. See slides 27 to 28 for more information and reconciliation to the nearest GAAP metric.
5. Cash from core operations is a non-GAAP metric and is generated from Net cash provided by continuing operating activities less sustaining capital, as presented on the non-
GAAP All-in sustaining cost table in the Company’s Q4 and FY 2015 earnings release filed on February 17, 2016. See slide 30 for more information and reconciliation to the
nearest GAAP metric.
6. Outlook projections used in this presentation are considered “forward-looking statements” and represent management’s good faith estimates or expectations of future production
results as of December 2, 2015. Outlook is based upon certain assumptions, including, but not limited to, metal prices, oil prices, certain exchange rates and other assumptions.
For example, Outlook assumes $1,100/oz Au, $2.50/lb Cu, $0.75 USD/AUD exchange rate and $65/barrel WTI. AISC and CAS cost estimates do not include inflation. Production,
AISC and capital estimates exclude projects that have not yet been approved (NW Exodus, Twin Underground, Batu Phase 7, Ahafo Mill Expansion and Subika
Underground). The potential impact on inventory valuation as a result of lower prices, input costs, and project decisions are not included as part of this Outlook. Long term ranges
(2018 – 2020) for production, AISC and capital provided in this presentation represent 3-year averages. Scheduled debt prepayments exclude capital leases. Such assumptions
may prove to be incorrect and actual results may differ materially from those anticipated. Consequently, Outlook cannot be guaranteed. As such, investors are cautioned not to
place undue reliance upon Outlook and forward-looking statements as there can be no assurance that the plans, assumptions or expectations upon which they are placed will
occur.

2015 yeq4results.16feb2016.vfinal

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (16)

Similar to 2015 yeq4results.16feb2016.vfinal (20)

More from Newmont Mining Corporation (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

2015 yeq4results.16feb2016.vfinal