2. 2
Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
Module Purpose: Teamwork
Demonstrate the role of teamwork in the execution
of systems engineering.
Describe the principles of successful teams.
Recognize, describe and self-evaluate the
personality types that may be found within any
team.
Learn the types, benefits and applications of the
Myers-Briggs personality type indicator.
3. Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
A major difference between university studies and
the work world: transition from individual work
performance to team work performance.
Academic opportunity to experience team work is the
senior (capstone) design class.
4. 4
Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
Systems Engineering Relies on Teamwork
A multidisciplinary team is system engineer’s most
powerful tool.
Often called Integrated Product Team (IPT) or
Integrated Product Development Team (IPDT).
Team led by systems engineer, with all significant
technical disciplines represented.
Reasons / Value of this approach
• No one individual has all the required knowledge.
• Diverse team interaction encourages ingenuity and creativity.
• Reduces engineering design time.
• Enables fewer problems in transition from engineering to
manufacturing to operations.
• Identifies and resolves technical subsystem conflicts early.
5. 5
Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
Developing a Team
Today’s challenge: “Team of teams”
• Team members are dispersed geographically
• Different culture basis
• Different process approaches
• Your team’s performance depends on a sub-team
or supplier’s performance
Goal: Creating a culture of collaboration
• Explicitly reward collaboration traits
• Honesty, integrity, sharing, receptivity, consistency,
respect
• Build trust
• Individual involvement in planning, creating,
strategizing, structuring
FORMING
FORMING
STORMING
STORMING
NORMING
NORMING
PERFORMING
PERFORMING
ADJOURNING
ADJOURNING
6. 6
Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
Team Principles from the JSC
Constellation Program Office, (1/2)
1. An atmosphere of professional expectations, trust and mutual respect
• Trust one another
• Engage in unfiltered conflict around ideas
• Commit to decisions and plans of actions
• Hold one another accountable for delivery against those plans
2. Staff leadership positions with team players
3. Focus on outcomes
4. Cooperation
• Designate what we should be working together with mutually
advantageous roles and responsibilities.
• Designate what efforts should be organized and operated as separate,
integration-free delegation of authority.
Healthy teaming that maximizes leverage of the entire agency (& industry)
• Define roles and responsibilities in terms so that teams do not clash
but rather mesh like teeth on a gear train.
• Employ a philosophy that teams are properly sized to their task and
function – no more, no less – at all levels.
7. 7
Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
Team Principles from the JSC
Constellation Program Office, (2/2)
6. Vigilance in finding and eliminating ‘wasted motion’ in pursuit of desired
outcomes
• Remain lean in the role of Program review of Project products.
• Allow duplication of project tasks only on an approved exception
basis.
• Putting a team ‘out of business’ is GOOD; the participants and
supporting talent can then be applied to the ‘next problem’ on the road
to the Moon.
• Ask if there are better ways to produce the product.
7. Team leads must take a ‘servant leader’ approach.
• Ascertain what are the problems of the team’s members (related to
the function of the team).
• Determine how they affect the desired outcomes of the team, and
what can be done to resolve them.
8. Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
What are the personalities that comprise
engineering teams?
What kind of team member are you?
9. 9
Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
What Is It?…
“Personality Type or Psychological Type are terms most
commonly associated with the model of personality
development created by Isabel Briggs Myers (aka Briggs
Meyers, Meyers Briggs, Briggs & Myers ) the author of the
world's most widely used personality inventory, the MBTI or
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Myers' and her mother,
Katharine Briggs, developed their model and inventory
around the ideas and theories of psychologist Carl Jung, a
contemporary of Sigmund Freud and a leading exponent of
Gestalt personality theory.”
Over the sixty years since its inception in 1943, the MBTI
has evolved and improved through continual test research
and development of ever more accurate questions. Millions
of people have taken the test.
• It is a standard tool for government executive training.
16 different personality types defined by using 4 letters in a
code.
10. 10
Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
The 4 Letter Code… (1/2)
First Letter: Ways of gaining energy
Energy Orientation pertains to the two forms of Energy
Consciousness each of us experiences on a daily basis.
Where do you get your energy: from an inwardly turned
world, or outwardly turned world. One of these worlds is
our elemental source of energy; the other secondary.
• [E] Extraversion versus [I] Introversion
Second Letter: Ways of taking in information
This set of mental preferences relates to how people
"Perceive" or take in information or gather data.
• [S] Sensing versus [N] iNtuition
11. 11
Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
The 4 Letter Code… (2/2)
Third Letter: Ways of making decisions
This set of mental preferences identifies how people
form "Judgments" or make decisions.
• [T] Thinking versus [F] Feeling
Fourth Letter: Ways of living in the world
Extraverted Orientation relates to which mental
preference one relies upon in dealing with/relating
with the Outside World. It is the mental function that
takes the lead in the Extraverted portion of a person's
personality.
• [J] Judging versus [P] Perceiving
12. 12
Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
Benefits…
Know thyself…
• Developing a self-portrait to understand your strengths and
preferences in addition to your areas for improvement and
opportunities for growth.
Know that others are different…
• Awareness of our own personality type and that there are
many different types makes it less likely that we assume that
others are like us.
Team dynamics…
• An appreciation and value of the differences between people
and how you can relate to your colleagues better.
Working in a diverse world…
• Improved communication and interpersonal skills.
13. 13
Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
Applications…
Leadership tool
• Improve employee communication
Team-building
• Increase team effectiveness and productivity
Hiring and staffing
• Establish the right mix of people
Career planning
• Match individuals to career interests
Problem solving
• Reduce workplace conflict
14. 14
Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
Taking a simplified test…
http://www.personalitypathways.com/type_inventory.html
NOTE: This modest self-scoring inventory is Not a substitute for
taking an MBTI. It is simply an introduction to personality type or
psychological type. It may whet your appetite for learning more
about the Myers and Briggs model of personality development
and its message of increased human understanding.The Style
Inventory will allow you to approximate what are your MBTI
Type preferences. After determining your 4 Type letters, you
can jump to a number of links we have provided to help you get
acquainted with the characteristics and indicators of the 16
types and verify if your type, as determined by this "unscientific"
survey, seems to "fit" or not.
15. Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
Pause and Learn Opportunity
Use class time to have the students take the quick M-B
test provided on
http://www.personalitypathways.com/type_inventory.html
If the classroom does not have internet access, print the
quiz so they can register results on a hardcopy.
Takes approximately 10 minutes to complete.
Have the students state their 4-letter M-B result and
register on the following chart; number of students in
each type.
16. 16
Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
ISTJ
#
Overseer/Inspector
ISFJ
#
Provider/Nourisher
INFJ
#
Foreseer/Developer
INTJ
#
Forseer/Mobilizer
ISTP
#
Maneuverer/Operator
ISFP
#
Performer/Composer
INFP
#
Proponent/Advocate
INTP
#
Inventor/Designer
ESTP
#
Maneuverer/Promoter
ESFP
#
Performer/Entertainer
ENFP
#
Proponent/Messenger
ENTP
#
Inventor/Improvisor
ESTJ
#
Overseer/Supervisor
ESFJ
#
Provider/Caretaker
ENFJ
#
Forseer/Mobilizer
ENTJ
#
Director/Commandant
Space Systems Engineering Class Type Table
Results for class of “x” students and “y” instructors
Red indicates JPL screen of SE types
17. 17
Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
ISTJ ISFJ INFJ INTJ
ISTP ISFP INFP INTP
ESTP ESFP ENFP ENTP
ESTJ ESFJ ENFJ ENTJ
The General US Population Distribution
11.6% 13.8% 1.5% 2.1%
5.4% 8.8% 4.4% 3.3%
2.5% 1.8%
12.3%
8.7%
4.3% 8.5% 8.1% 3.2%
Lyndon B. Johnson
Bette Davis
Bill Clinton
Sally Field
George H. W. Bush
Evander Holyfield
Queen Elizabeth II
Michael Jordan
Jimmy Carter
Mother Teresa
Madonna
Jack Nicholson
Bob Hope
Mary Lou Retton
Tom Cruise
Keith Richards
Marilyn Monroe
Michael Jackson
Tom Brokaw
Julia Roberts
Sir Isaac Newton
Albert Einstein
John F. Kennedy
C.S. Lewis
Robin Williams
Bill Cosby
Alexander the Great
Sir Walter Raleigh
Abraham Lincoln
Ronald Reagan
Franklin D. Roosevelt
David Letterman
19. 19
Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
Myers-Briggs Meets Star Trek
What sort of crewman would you make?
• If you were in Starfleet, would you be an excellent Engineer,
commanding Captain, or fearsome fighter? Or would you be
the guy in the red shirt who doesn't come back from the
Away Mission?
Different Star Trek personality tests online; 3 examples:?
• http://www.blifaloo.com/quizzes/trek/trek_quiz_start.php
• http://members.tripod.com/Melissa_Umlor/trek.html
• http://www.seabreezecomputers.com/startrek/
MYERS-BRIGGS STAR TREK PERSONALITY INDICATOR
• Which character are you?
• Summary results at the following site:
• http://www.wischik.com/damon/Texts/myersbriggstrek.html
20. Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
Related Reading:
If You Want Good Systems Engineers,
Sometimes You Have To Grow Your Own!
JPL paper by P. A. Trisha Jansma and Mary Ellen Derro
21. 21
Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
Module Summary: Teamwork
Working in teams is a major difference between
university work and space project development work.
Multi-disciplinary teams, called integrated product
teams (IPTs) are responsible for the development of
subsystems.
There are well-defined principles to successful
teamwork.
Myers-Briggs is a popular personality indicator that is
useful in understanding your own preferences and
those of your team.
23. 23
Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
Team Behavior (1/2)
What it means to be an effective team member:
• Take responsibility for the success of the team
• Be a person who delivers on commitments
• Be a contributor to discussions
• Give your full attention to whomever is speaking and
demonstrate this by asking helpful questions
• Develop techniques for getting your message across to the
team
• Learn to give and receive useful feedback
24. 24
Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
Team Behavior (2/2)
Characteristics of an effective team:
• Team goals are as important as individual goals.
• The team understands the goals and is committed to
achieving them.
• Trust replaces fear and people feel comfortable taking risks.
• Respect, collaboration and open-mindedness are prevalent.
• Team members communicate readily; diversity of opinions
are encouraged.
• Decisions are made by consensus and have the acceptance
and support of the members of the team.
25. 25
Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
IPDT Approach
A basic principle of IPDT is to get all disciplines involved at the
beginning of the development process to ensure that requirements are
completely stated and understood for the full life cycle of the product.
This up-front activity is considered part of the Systems Engineering
process.
Historically, the initial development of requirements has been led by
Systems Engineers. In an IPDT, the Systems Engineers still lead the
requirements development process, but now more (all) disciplines
participate in it. Requirements are developed initially at the system
level, then successively at lower levels as the requirements are flowed
down. Teams, led by Systems Engineers, perform the upfront Systems
Engineering functions at each level.
This is different from the previous, classical development approach
where Systems Engineers did the up-front work and passed the
requirements along to development engineers who passed their
designs on to manufacturing, thence to test, without the continuous
involvement of the initial engineers. This resulted in a loss of
understanding caused by asynchronous communications.
The general approach is to form cross-functional product/process
teams for all products and services, plus a Systems Engineering &
Integration Team (SEIT) to cover systems issues, balance
requirements between product teams, and help integrate the teams.
26. 26
Space Systems Engineering: Teamwork Module
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
Benefits to Teamwork
One of the practical applications of the MBTI and
understanding these preferences is in supporting better
Teamwork. Differences in these mental preferences lead to
quite different value structures and communication styles,
which can hamper mutual understanding and cooperation.
For example, people who share Sensing and Thinking
preferences find they are naturally on the same wavelength;
they easily understand one another, making good teammates
and partners. Likewise, people who share Intuition and Feeling
have a similar kinship among them. However, in the "real"
world, it is more likely that you'll find a mixed bag of people, a
variety of types, in the same work group. While this diversity
can be a useful strength, contributing to greater depth and
breadth of team competence, there will be natural
communication barriers within the team due to their natural
mental language differences.
Such differences can be overcome, and the communication
gap bridged, with mutual respect and practice learning to
"talk" and "think" in a second or third type.
Editor's Notes
#1:Version 1.0
SOURCE INFORMATION:
The material contained in this lecture was developed by Lisa Guerra of NASA’s Exploration Systems Mission Directorate while on assignment in the Department of Aerospace Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. As part of a course entitled, Space Systems Engineering, the lecture was piloted at UT-Austin in Spring 2008.
The content that follows was also reviewed and edited by Dr. Paul Graf, Adjunct Professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder.
#3:Another major difference is the transition from well defined, bounded problems to ill-defined ambiguous problems.
#4:Source: INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook v. 3.1; Appendix H
and
Source: Griffin/French notes from Spacecraft Systems Design and Engineering
#5:Team of teams - from Eric Honour presentation on collaboration.
Emphasis on suppliers coming from around the world to produce one product.
Boeing’s latest aircraft is a good example.
Forming – Storming – Norming – Performing - Adjourning model of group development first by Bruce Tuckman;
see: Tuckman, Bruce. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological bulletin, 63, 384-399.
#6:JSC - Johnson Space Center
The above text is from an email from the Constellation Program Manager, Jeff Hanley (sent July 2007).
A group called the PET (Program Excellence Team) derived the principles above for teamwork.
#15:Here are other websites to do a similar personality test resulting in the Myers-Briggs 4 letter personality type.
You can try one of these instead of the one listed in the lecture and/or have the students use them outside the classroom to confirm their type.
http://www.41q.com/
http://www.kisa.ca/personality/
http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes2.asp
#17:Source: Myers, I.B., McCaulley, M.H., Quenk, N.L. and Hammer,
A.L., MBTI Manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists
Press (1998). As reproduced in:
Is there an engineering type?; Luiz F. Capretz; World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education
Vol.1, No.2, 2002
#18:
Source: Is there an engineering type?; Luiz F. Capretz; World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education
Vol.1, No.2, 2002
The I refers to the ratio known as the self-selection index in the Selection Rate Type Table (SRTT). The ratio is computed based on the percentage of the observed frequency to the expected frequency. When I is greater than 1.00 there are more people in that cell of the table than would be expected from their numbers in the general population.
#23:Source: Dieter, G. E., Engineering Design: A Materials and Processing Approach, 3rd edition, 2000.
Chapter 3
#24:Source: Dieter, G. E., Engineering Design: A Materials and Processing Approach, 3rd edition, 2000.
Chapter 3
#25:Source: INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook v. 3.1; Appendix H
Lots of additional thoughts, tables and graphics on 3 different type of teams in this Appendix. Good source if want to expand on the teamwork aspects of the job.