the outline, below, basically sets forth some "hermeneutical spirals" (as i write this,
it occurs to me that lonergan should be added, too)
of interest is the notion that epistemology models ontology, which leaves a question
begging of how some get a god-ontology (e.g. panentheism) correct but epistemology
(e.g. arational gnosticism) wrong? (not really a theo-ontology but a theology of
nature that begins within the faith and not, rather, from metaphysics)
part of the answer lies in the fact that just b/c someone tenders an erroneous account
of how it is that they know what they know doesn't mean they're wrong re: what they
know; rather, they are the beneficiaries of a good formation, which they simply don't
fully understand or appreciate (and that formation is, imo, most often liturgical &
devotional, instilling, via a participatory imagination, an unconscious competence
that is too often not complemented by such an authentic & robust catechesis as would
make them consciously competent & good apologists)
i'm not developing this further, presently, but maybe it'll evoke a musing of your own
below, i juxtapose kant's interrogatories (as they say), the 4 senses of scripture
(classical), the categories of my axiological epistemology and the theological virtues
(+awareness, but maybe some gift of the spirit would be a better analogue?)
what can i know or literal or descriptive or awareness
what can i hope for or anagogical or evaluative or hope
what must i do or moral or normative or love
what does this mean or allegorical or interpretive or faith

1

More Related Content

PDF
Intention and attention: Intension, extension, and “attension” of a notion o...
PDF
Beyond pluralism
PPTX
выставка
PPTX
Карклина О Н "Итоговое сочинение-2017"
PPTX
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
PPSX
ტაო–კლარჯეთის საოცრება
PDF
02 estudo mgb079_a15
PPTX
MEDIOS DE COBRO Y PAGO
Intention and attention: Intension, extension, and “attension” of a notion o...
Beyond pluralism
выставка
Карклина О Н "Итоговое сочинение-2017"
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
ტაო–კლარჯეთის საოცრება
02 estudo mgb079_a15
MEDIOS DE COBRO Y PAGO

Similar to 4 senses of scripture (20)

RTF
A philosophical theology for inter faith dialogue
RTF
A philosophical theology for inter faith dialogue
PDF
Nonduality is more epistemic than ontological
PDF
Re buddhism and pxnty
PDF
Christian nonduality, panentheism & anarchism
PDF
dual vs nondual consciouness
PDF
Zenchristian
PDF
Re buddhism and pxnty
PDF
Intentional nonduality
PDF
Bourgeault rohr et al10jan2012
PDF
Intentional nonduality
PDF
Zen Christian
PDF
Advent2011 morrell blog
PDF
Pneumatological consensus by sylvest
PDF
My christian nonduality using ken wilber's advaita as a foil
PDF
Atheological christians
PDF
Christian nonduality, panentheism & anarchism revised
PDF
PDF
Consciousness as anthropology not theology
PDF
Bourgeault contd 07jan2012
A philosophical theology for inter faith dialogue
A philosophical theology for inter faith dialogue
Nonduality is more epistemic than ontological
Re buddhism and pxnty
Christian nonduality, panentheism & anarchism
dual vs nondual consciouness
Zenchristian
Re buddhism and pxnty
Intentional nonduality
Bourgeault rohr et al10jan2012
Intentional nonduality
Zen Christian
Advent2011 morrell blog
Pneumatological consensus by sylvest
My christian nonduality using ken wilber's advaita as a foil
Atheological christians
Christian nonduality, panentheism & anarchism revised
Consciousness as anthropology not theology
Bourgeault contd 07jan2012
Ad

More from johnboy_philothea_net (20)

PDF
Moral justification of our tragic reality via omnipathy
PDF
Emerging christianity interfaith account of orthodoxic spi
PDF
Eucharistic model
PDF
The missing divine attribute omnipathy
PDF
In all religions we are invited to dig deeper
PDF
A soteriological orthodoxy and sophiological polydoxy
PDF
Deconstructing deconstructionism
PDF
Faith between a naive realism and radical deconstructionism
PDF
In defense of metaphysics and its meaningfulness
PDF
The role of change in metaphysics not so fast
PDF
The role of change in metaphysics not so fast
PDF
Orthodoxy weds polydoxy god as lover
PDF
Orthodoxy weds polydoxy god as lover
PDF
To john caputo yes, but
PDF
Ontologizing schmontologizing, philosophical or theological
PDF
Deconstruct this!
PDF
The (semiotic) failure of logocentrism
PDF
A look at panentheism from a semiotic vantage point
PDF
Dorothy day and gospel norms
PDF
Interfaith dialogue as sophiologic gift exchange
Moral justification of our tragic reality via omnipathy
Emerging christianity interfaith account of orthodoxic spi
Eucharistic model
The missing divine attribute omnipathy
In all religions we are invited to dig deeper
A soteriological orthodoxy and sophiological polydoxy
Deconstructing deconstructionism
Faith between a naive realism and radical deconstructionism
In defense of metaphysics and its meaningfulness
The role of change in metaphysics not so fast
The role of change in metaphysics not so fast
Orthodoxy weds polydoxy god as lover
Orthodoxy weds polydoxy god as lover
To john caputo yes, but
Ontologizing schmontologizing, philosophical or theological
Deconstruct this!
The (semiotic) failure of logocentrism
A look at panentheism from a semiotic vantage point
Dorothy day and gospel norms
Interfaith dialogue as sophiologic gift exchange
Ad

4 senses of scripture

  • 1. the outline, below, basically sets forth some "hermeneutical spirals" (as i write this, it occurs to me that lonergan should be added, too) of interest is the notion that epistemology models ontology, which leaves a question begging of how some get a god-ontology (e.g. panentheism) correct but epistemology (e.g. arational gnosticism) wrong? (not really a theo-ontology but a theology of nature that begins within the faith and not, rather, from metaphysics) part of the answer lies in the fact that just b/c someone tenders an erroneous account of how it is that they know what they know doesn't mean they're wrong re: what they know; rather, they are the beneficiaries of a good formation, which they simply don't fully understand or appreciate (and that formation is, imo, most often liturgical & devotional, instilling, via a participatory imagination, an unconscious competence that is too often not complemented by such an authentic & robust catechesis as would make them consciously competent & good apologists) i'm not developing this further, presently, but maybe it'll evoke a musing of your own below, i juxtapose kant's interrogatories (as they say), the 4 senses of scripture (classical), the categories of my axiological epistemology and the theological virtues (+awareness, but maybe some gift of the spirit would be a better analogue?) what can i know or literal or descriptive or awareness what can i hope for or anagogical or evaluative or hope what must i do or moral or normative or love what does this mean or allegorical or interpretive or faith 1