SlideShare a Scribd company logo
GROUP ASIGNMENT #3:  WHO IS TO ASSESS? CASE STUDY Courtney Beaulne Jon Cappello Karine Cosgrove EDU 5230
HOW DO WE SEE SUSAN? New, unseasoned teacher Female VS the male antagonist Desire to please and to remain  employed Competent but recognizes she is  not a “master teacher” yet Her focus is on the qualitative not the  quantitative in educating her students Pushed to leave the narrow confines of who she thinks she is Her “home” is her one-best-way:  subjectivity
HOW SUSAN MIGHT FEEL AND PERCEIVE THE INTERACTIONS With Mrs. Cipher & Mr. Donald Her skills and knowledge are dismissed due to her lack of experience Her skills and knowledge are undervalued, because she is not perceived as the “expert” She is being too subjective, and too emotional  With  Tony and Sarah  She can relate to Tony and Sarah, being in a new environment She has taken the time to get to know Toney and Sarah personally, whereas Mr. Donald does not know them
SUSAN’S FINAL VOCABULARY Fairness and equality is subjective to each student Her role demands that she tailors her instruction method for each student She is knowledgeable in critical literacy and alternative assessment (graduate courses) SUSAN’S VALUES: Understanding and seeing the student as a whole, and understanding the frames in which they function Not “completely comfortable” with Mr. Donald’s standardized tests
WHAT IS SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT? Focus on efficiency, rational,  and practicality through  technical knowledge “ developing each individual […] so that he can do highest class of work for which his natural abilities fit him” (Taylor, 1911, p. 3) Rubric of mastery,  control and compliance One best approach “ There is always one method and one implement which is quicker and better than the rest”  (Taylor, 1911, p. 9) Depersonalization and objectification
THROUGH THE LENS OF TAYLORISTIC  SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT:  RUBRIC OF MASTERY Susan and Mr. Donald both are confined to their own worlds, however broad or narrow Mr. Donald’s perspective is  wrong  according to Susan, Susan’s method is the sole best method. Subjectivity is the only way to proceed efficiently in assessing students such as Tony and Sarah.
THROUGH THE LENS OF ARISTOTELIAN  PHRONESIS:  NON-RUBRIC OF MYSTERY Creating dialogue with Mr. Donald, listening with an open mind to his perspective Moving forward to a consensus with Mr. Donald, understanding the consequences of each action Understanding Tony and Sarah’s frames will allow Susan and Mr. Donald to collectively find an adequate assessment for each student Not discounting the subjective while  still understanding the value of the  objective
BARRY SCHWARTZ: USING OUR PRACTICAL WISDOM  http:// www.youtube.com/watch?v =IDS-ieLCmS4
FLEXIBILITY... BENDING THE RULES The final solution has Ms. Cipher dancing around  both the subjective and objective approaches, coming up with “just the right combination for this particular moment” or in our case the particular student. Rule bending or flexibility only happens to service the right purposes, in the right contexts. In our case study, it is to service the students in the best way possible.
FUSION: Blending the Subjective and Objective Susan needs to  GIVE   a little (understand the value of objective tests),  GAIN   a little (demonstrate the uses for her subjective strategies) and  GROW  (in appreciating the different perspectives in the assessment of students) Ms. Cipher can bring about this collaboration and open the communication in having both Mr. Donald and Susan communicate the values of their own approaches

More Related Content

PPT
5230 group assignment case study
PPT
5230 group case study
PPT
EDU5230 Case Study- SUSAN
PPT
Pragmaatism....
PPTX
social learning theory applied to english as second language classroom
PPTX
Social learning theory
PPT
Albert Bandura & Social Cognitive Theory
PPTX
5230 group assignment case study
5230 group case study
EDU5230 Case Study- SUSAN
Pragmaatism....
social learning theory applied to english as second language classroom
Social learning theory
Albert Bandura & Social Cognitive Theory

What's hot (17)

PPTX
Theory of learning
PPTX
Albert bandura
PDF
Narratives on challenges
PPTX
Social Cognitive Theory In a Workplace
PPTX
Bandura social cognitive theory
PPTX
Alves social learning presentation
PPT
Existentialism
PDF
L&b week 6
PPTX
Bandura’s Theory of Social Learning
PDF
Personal Learning Theory
PPTX
DevelopmenRECONSTRUCTING KNOWLEDGE-IN-ACTION Learning from the authority of e...
PPT
Criticisms Of Factors Inside Schools
PPTX
Learning theories based on social perspective
PPTX
Observational learning
PPTX
Social cognitive theory
PPTX
Albertbandura 140115100337-phpapp01 (2)
PDF
Albert Bandura (1925-2021)
Theory of learning
Albert bandura
Narratives on challenges
Social Cognitive Theory In a Workplace
Bandura social cognitive theory
Alves social learning presentation
Existentialism
L&b week 6
Bandura’s Theory of Social Learning
Personal Learning Theory
DevelopmenRECONSTRUCTING KNOWLEDGE-IN-ACTION Learning from the authority of e...
Criticisms Of Factors Inside Schools
Learning theories based on social perspective
Observational learning
Social cognitive theory
Albertbandura 140115100337-phpapp01 (2)
Albert Bandura (1925-2021)
Ad

Viewers also liked (7)

PPTX
Myroguecloud Overview 021911
PPT
EDU5230- CASE STUDY
PPT
Business communication]
PPTX
First Thursday. Seattle's Art Walk
PPTX
PPT
5230 group assignment3 case study
PPT
Ancient egypt yoselinn
Myroguecloud Overview 021911
EDU5230- CASE STUDY
Business communication]
First Thursday. Seattle's Art Walk
5230 group assignment3 case study
Ancient egypt yoselinn
Ad

Similar to 5230 group assignment case study (20)

DOCX
Final.docx
PPTX
LESSON 3 on Assessment of Learning 2 Online
PPTX
Problematising Assessment
PPTX
Language assessment
PPTX
Testing, assessing, and teaching
PPT
A AND E.ppt
PPTX
Language Assessment to help teachers and students
PDF
What makes a good secondary assessment on achieving the aims of assessment
PDF
Testing a Test: Evaluating Our Assessment Tools
PPTX
Group1 Assessment
PDF
Principles of language assessment
PPTX
Unit 7 Assessment Students performance.pptx
PPTX
ELTLAE Group 2.pptx
PPTX
Lecture 7. Assessment design.pptx ways of assessment design
PPTX
Assessment in Pre-School and Primary School
PPTX
Lesson-18-Traditional-assessment.Power pointpptx
PDF
Authentic assessment 2 ppt
PPTX
ASSESSMENT-IN-LEARNING module in ppt format
PPTX
Assessment, types and purpose
PPTX
Assessment, grading, cheating and how to deal with them.pptx
Final.docx
LESSON 3 on Assessment of Learning 2 Online
Problematising Assessment
Language assessment
Testing, assessing, and teaching
A AND E.ppt
Language Assessment to help teachers and students
What makes a good secondary assessment on achieving the aims of assessment
Testing a Test: Evaluating Our Assessment Tools
Group1 Assessment
Principles of language assessment
Unit 7 Assessment Students performance.pptx
ELTLAE Group 2.pptx
Lecture 7. Assessment design.pptx ways of assessment design
Assessment in Pre-School and Primary School
Lesson-18-Traditional-assessment.Power pointpptx
Authentic assessment 2 ppt
ASSESSMENT-IN-LEARNING module in ppt format
Assessment, types and purpose
Assessment, grading, cheating and how to deal with them.pptx

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
PDF
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
PDF
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
PDF
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
PDF
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
DOC
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
PDF
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين
PDF
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
PDF
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access-Surgery.pdf
PPTX
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
PDF
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
PDF
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PDF
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
PDF
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
PPTX
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
Complications of Minimal Access-Surgery.pdf
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...

5230 group assignment case study

  • 1. GROUP ASIGNMENT #3: WHO IS TO ASSESS? CASE STUDY Courtney Beaulne Jon Cappello Karine Cosgrove EDU 5230
  • 2. HOW DO WE SEE SUSAN? New, unseasoned teacher Female VS the male antagonist Desire to please and to remain employed Competent but recognizes she is not a “master teacher” yet Her focus is on the qualitative not the quantitative in educating her students Pushed to leave the narrow confines of who she thinks she is Her “home” is her one-best-way: subjectivity
  • 3. HOW SUSAN MIGHT FEEL AND PERCEIVE THE INTERACTIONS With Mrs. Cipher & Mr. Donald Her skills and knowledge are dismissed due to her lack of experience Her skills and knowledge are undervalued, because she is not perceived as the “expert” She is being too subjective, and too emotional With Tony and Sarah She can relate to Tony and Sarah, being in a new environment She has taken the time to get to know Toney and Sarah personally, whereas Mr. Donald does not know them
  • 4. SUSAN’S FINAL VOCABULARY Fairness and equality is subjective to each student Her role demands that she tailors her instruction method for each student She is knowledgeable in critical literacy and alternative assessment (graduate courses) SUSAN’S VALUES: Understanding and seeing the student as a whole, and understanding the frames in which they function Not “completely comfortable” with Mr. Donald’s standardized tests
  • 5. WHAT IS SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT? Focus on efficiency, rational, and practicality through technical knowledge “ developing each individual […] so that he can do highest class of work for which his natural abilities fit him” (Taylor, 1911, p. 3) Rubric of mastery, control and compliance One best approach “ There is always one method and one implement which is quicker and better than the rest” (Taylor, 1911, p. 9) Depersonalization and objectification
  • 6. THROUGH THE LENS OF TAYLORISTIC SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT: RUBRIC OF MASTERY Susan and Mr. Donald both are confined to their own worlds, however broad or narrow Mr. Donald’s perspective is wrong according to Susan, Susan’s method is the sole best method. Subjectivity is the only way to proceed efficiently in assessing students such as Tony and Sarah.
  • 7. THROUGH THE LENS OF ARISTOTELIAN PHRONESIS: NON-RUBRIC OF MYSTERY Creating dialogue with Mr. Donald, listening with an open mind to his perspective Moving forward to a consensus with Mr. Donald, understanding the consequences of each action Understanding Tony and Sarah’s frames will allow Susan and Mr. Donald to collectively find an adequate assessment for each student Not discounting the subjective while still understanding the value of the objective
  • 8. BARRY SCHWARTZ: USING OUR PRACTICAL WISDOM http:// www.youtube.com/watch?v =IDS-ieLCmS4
  • 9. FLEXIBILITY... BENDING THE RULES The final solution has Ms. Cipher dancing around both the subjective and objective approaches, coming up with “just the right combination for this particular moment” or in our case the particular student. Rule bending or flexibility only happens to service the right purposes, in the right contexts. In our case study, it is to service the students in the best way possible.
  • 10. FUSION: Blending the Subjective and Objective Susan needs to GIVE a little (understand the value of objective tests), GAIN a little (demonstrate the uses for her subjective strategies) and GROW (in appreciating the different perspectives in the assessment of students) Ms. Cipher can bring about this collaboration and open the communication in having both Mr. Donald and Susan communicate the values of their own approaches

Editor's Notes

  • #4: Karine:
  • #5: Karine: fairness and equality is subjective to each student, whereas Mr. Donald fairness and equality is the same for every student not comfortable… because she is unaware.. Or because it doesn’t fit in with her values and principles?
  • #6: Karine: Rubric of mastery, control and compliance is achieved by reducing variables, quantifying ends-means process
  • #9: Clip: start at 5:41 – aristole’s bending of rules, Wise People and bending rules: 6:45 – 8:39
  • #10: Karine: in dealing with other people demands flexibility that bend the rules to service the right aims, morally. Bending the rules to Sarah and Tony’s context, not own interests. So for Sarah’s case, bending the rules to her context may apply, but in others, it may not.