FMP
EvaluationSydney wratten
Production
Process
Evaluation
Research
• The strengths of my research is that I researched
into each one of my existing projects and focussed
on what I wanted to involve I my audio project. My
research helped my product by the way it influenced
everything I talked about.
• The weaknesses of my research was that I didn’t
really go into much depth when researching anything
to do with the new therefore I didn’t talk about
anything which might have informed my audience
about the news or whether. Next time I wont limit
myself for what I research and I will go into more
depth when finding out information.
Planning
• The strength of my planning would be that I
produced a lot of information on my mind map, this
enabled me to create my product to a better
standard. A strength of my planning would be that I
gathered my sound tracks to help ensure that I was
certain about what I could discuss on my radio
show.
• A weakness of my planning would be that I didn’t
fully keep to my schedule therefore caused me to
fall behind slightly. I would change this keeping to
schedule, doing some work in my own time. It took
me a while to find the right songs for my product
considering I had to find songs suitable for my
target audience.
Time Management
• I didn’t managed to keep on
schedule through out the unit which
caused me to fall behind. I think
that my project would be improved
with more time so that I could
explain and analyze my research
and plan more.
• Next time I will try and complete
more work at home and try to be
less distracted when it comes to
working.
Technical Qualities
• Compared to Nick Grimshaws radio show my
product contains a large variety of music just like
his.
• A difference between my product and Nick
Grimshaws radio show is that he has a genuine
jingle where as my product has an alternative
Jingles as I have used music instead of a little
tune.
• Another difference between our products is that
Nick Grimshaws radio show has a music bed
where as my product doesn’t which I think helps
the audience concentrate on what were talking
about.
• Another similarity of the radio show and my
product is that they both fade in and fade out at
the beginning and end.
Aural Qualities
• I spoke at a pace in which my audience could understand
me clearly and keep their interest.
• I spoke at a tone in which my voice could inform my
audience that the radio show was intended to be happy.
• We talked about funny morning routines to ensure that my
product had a humorous feel to it.
• I thought my product was creative considering I had made
a game which was specific to a certain radio show.
• I like the section of the radio show in which we talked
about word that we didn’t know what a certain word meant
and what we thought it could mean. The audience would
be interested in the different words.
• I would improve my product by minimising the amount of
gaps and pauses.
Audience Appeal
o The audience would be interested in my product because my radio show was
informative, educational and humorous.
• It was informative because I talked about the use of Netflix and what you
could watch on it.
• It was educational because I talked about what certain word meant and what
words were similar to each other.
• It was humorous because I played a game in which made me, my co-host and
special guest played which intended to make the audience sit think and laugh.
o My target audience would have been interested in the music I played
considering that they were from the age of 16-25.
Peer
Feedback
Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
• Radio Game made me Laugh as the impressions were
humorous and the team seemed too have a laugh
which gave off good vibes and put me in a better
mood
• The songs appealed to me other than the last one
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
• I think that the conversations were too long and
should have been shorter to keep the interest of the
audience, also there wasn’t enough music in the
Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
• I like the music at the beginning it is a good
introduction to get the piece started, it keeps you
intrigued to keep listening. You talk about Netflix
which is a current theme and trend throughout
podcasts this is positive and your target audience will
find this interesting.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
• The fades and cuts could have been improved but
the music sounds good and works with the product to
keep the listener interested.
Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
• I liked the how enthusiastic you were
whilst speaking, I also liked the way you
spoke as if you knew what you were
saying it made it seem as if you had
properly researched what you were talking
about.
• What improvements could have been
made to the product?
• I think an improvement would be that
you should consider using a music bed
behind your talking.
Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer
feedback?
• I definitely agree with the improvement of including
more music in the radio show because I feel this will
keep the audiences attention for longer. I also agree
with a comment saying that I should include a music
bed because it will help to identify my show.
• What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback?
• I disagree with the comment suggesting that I should
shorten the conversations between myself and the
guest or the co-host because I think the content of
the conversation was interesting and kept the reader
Peer Feedback Summary
As a radio presenter, recorder, editor and scripter of
this project next time I would change the layout of the
radio show by adding a couple more songs in to
separate the dialog, this would continuously grab the
audiences attention with the variety of sound that they
will be hearing.
I would also add in a music bed to help the
audience differentiate my radio show from others and
help keep the radio show unique.

More Related Content

PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
8. evaluation (jrw) audio
PPTX
7. evaluation(audio)
PPTX
7. evaluation(4) dxd
PPTX
7. evaluation(7)
PPTX
8. evaluation (lf) audio
PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
7. Audio Evaluation
7. evaluation(4)
8. evaluation (jrw) audio
7. evaluation(audio)
7. evaluation(4) dxd
7. evaluation(7)
8. evaluation (lf) audio
7. evaluation(4)
7. Audio Evaluation

What's hot (20)

PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
7. fmp evaluation final
PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
7. audio evaluation
PPTX
7. evaluation(4) (1)
PPTX
7. evaluation final
PPTX
6.7 evaluation copy
PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
6.7 evaluation copy
PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
7. evaluation(4) p6
PPTX
7. evaluation audio 2
PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
7. evaluation
PPTX
8. evaluation (js)
PPTX
7. evaluation
PPTX
7. evaluation
PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
7. fmp evaluation final
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
7. audio evaluation
7. evaluation(4) (1)
7. evaluation final
6.7 evaluation copy
7. evaluation(4)
6.7 evaluation copy
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4) p6
7. evaluation audio 2
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation
8. evaluation (js)
7. evaluation
7. evaluation
7. evaluation(4)
Ad

Similar to 7. evaluation unit 6 (20)

PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
7. fmp evaluation final 2 1
PPTX
Audio Project - Evaluation
PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
7. Evaluation(5)
PPTX
Evaluation
PPTX
7. evaluation(4) done
PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
7. fmp evaluation submission
PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
7. evaluation(4) (1)
PPTX
7. evaluation(4) (1)
PPTX
7. Evaluation(4).pptx
PPTX
7. evaluation
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
7. fmp evaluation final 2 1
Audio Project - Evaluation
7. evaluation(4)
7. Evaluation(5)
Evaluation
7. evaluation(4) done
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
7. fmp evaluation submission
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4)
7. evaluation(4) (1)
7. evaluation(4) (1)
7. Evaluation(4).pptx
7. evaluation
Ad

More from Sydney Wratten (20)

DOCX
3. formal proposal audio production
DOCX
3. formal proposal advergame
PPTX
7. evaluation unit 5
PPTX
7. evaluation unit 4
PPTX
7. evaluation unit3
PPTX
7. fmp evaluation
PPTX
1. fmp initial plans
DOCX
4. fmp proposal
PPTX
6. fmp production reflection
PPTX
5. fmp pre production
PPTX
3. fmp production experiments
PPTX
2. fmp research
PPTX
3. production experiments(2)
PPTX
Theory research
PPTX
Theory meaning
PPTX
Theory audience
PPTX
1. communication methods pro forma(1)-3
PPTX
2. production techniques evaluation pro forma(1) (1)
PPTX
5. pre production(3)
DOCX
4. proposal(3)
3. formal proposal audio production
3. formal proposal advergame
7. evaluation unit 5
7. evaluation unit 4
7. evaluation unit3
7. fmp evaluation
1. fmp initial plans
4. fmp proposal
6. fmp production reflection
5. fmp pre production
3. fmp production experiments
2. fmp research
3. production experiments(2)
Theory research
Theory meaning
Theory audience
1. communication methods pro forma(1)-3
2. production techniques evaluation pro forma(1) (1)
5. pre production(3)
4. proposal(3)

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx
PDF
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
PPTX
20th Century Theater, Methods, History.pptx
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PDF
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
PPTX
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
PDF
Uderstanding digital marketing and marketing stratergie for engaging the digi...
PPTX
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
PDF
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
PDF
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
PDF
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
PDF
MBA _Common_ 2nd year Syllabus _2021-22_.pdf
PDF
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
PDF
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين
PDF
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
PPTX
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PDF
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
PDF
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
PDF
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
20th Century Theater, Methods, History.pptx
advance database management system book.pdf
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
Uderstanding digital marketing and marketing stratergie for engaging the digi...
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
MBA _Common_ 2nd year Syllabus _2021-22_.pdf
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...

7. evaluation unit 6

  • 3. Research • The strengths of my research is that I researched into each one of my existing projects and focussed on what I wanted to involve I my audio project. My research helped my product by the way it influenced everything I talked about. • The weaknesses of my research was that I didn’t really go into much depth when researching anything to do with the new therefore I didn’t talk about anything which might have informed my audience about the news or whether. Next time I wont limit myself for what I research and I will go into more depth when finding out information.
  • 4. Planning • The strength of my planning would be that I produced a lot of information on my mind map, this enabled me to create my product to a better standard. A strength of my planning would be that I gathered my sound tracks to help ensure that I was certain about what I could discuss on my radio show. • A weakness of my planning would be that I didn’t fully keep to my schedule therefore caused me to fall behind slightly. I would change this keeping to schedule, doing some work in my own time. It took me a while to find the right songs for my product considering I had to find songs suitable for my target audience.
  • 5. Time Management • I didn’t managed to keep on schedule through out the unit which caused me to fall behind. I think that my project would be improved with more time so that I could explain and analyze my research and plan more. • Next time I will try and complete more work at home and try to be less distracted when it comes to working.
  • 6. Technical Qualities • Compared to Nick Grimshaws radio show my product contains a large variety of music just like his. • A difference between my product and Nick Grimshaws radio show is that he has a genuine jingle where as my product has an alternative Jingles as I have used music instead of a little tune. • Another difference between our products is that Nick Grimshaws radio show has a music bed where as my product doesn’t which I think helps the audience concentrate on what were talking about. • Another similarity of the radio show and my product is that they both fade in and fade out at the beginning and end.
  • 7. Aural Qualities • I spoke at a pace in which my audience could understand me clearly and keep their interest. • I spoke at a tone in which my voice could inform my audience that the radio show was intended to be happy. • We talked about funny morning routines to ensure that my product had a humorous feel to it. • I thought my product was creative considering I had made a game which was specific to a certain radio show. • I like the section of the radio show in which we talked about word that we didn’t know what a certain word meant and what we thought it could mean. The audience would be interested in the different words. • I would improve my product by minimising the amount of gaps and pauses.
  • 8. Audience Appeal o The audience would be interested in my product because my radio show was informative, educational and humorous. • It was informative because I talked about the use of Netflix and what you could watch on it. • It was educational because I talked about what certain word meant and what words were similar to each other. • It was humorous because I played a game in which made me, my co-host and special guest played which intended to make the audience sit think and laugh. o My target audience would have been interested in the music I played considering that they were from the age of 16-25.
  • 10. Feedback 1 • What did you like about the product? • Radio Game made me Laugh as the impressions were humorous and the team seemed too have a laugh which gave off good vibes and put me in a better mood • The songs appealed to me other than the last one • What improvements could have been made to the product? • I think that the conversations were too long and should have been shorter to keep the interest of the audience, also there wasn’t enough music in the
  • 11. Feedback 2 • What did you like about the product? • I like the music at the beginning it is a good introduction to get the piece started, it keeps you intrigued to keep listening. You talk about Netflix which is a current theme and trend throughout podcasts this is positive and your target audience will find this interesting. • What improvements could have been made to the product? • The fades and cuts could have been improved but the music sounds good and works with the product to keep the listener interested.
  • 12. Feedback 3 • What did you like about the product? • I liked the how enthusiastic you were whilst speaking, I also liked the way you spoke as if you knew what you were saying it made it seem as if you had properly researched what you were talking about. • What improvements could have been made to the product? • I think an improvement would be that you should consider using a music bed behind your talking.
  • 13. Peer Feedback Summary • What do you agree with from your peer feedback? • I definitely agree with the improvement of including more music in the radio show because I feel this will keep the audiences attention for longer. I also agree with a comment saying that I should include a music bed because it will help to identify my show. • What do you disagree with from your peer feedback? • I disagree with the comment suggesting that I should shorten the conversations between myself and the guest or the co-host because I think the content of the conversation was interesting and kept the reader
  • 14. Peer Feedback Summary As a radio presenter, recorder, editor and scripter of this project next time I would change the layout of the radio show by adding a couple more songs in to separate the dialog, this would continuously grab the audiences attention with the variety of sound that they will be hearing. I would also add in a music bed to help the audience differentiate my radio show from others and help keep the radio show unique.

Editor's Notes

  • #4: What were the strengths of your research? How did your research help your product? What were the weaknesses of your research? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  • #5: What were the strengths of your planning? How did your planning help your product? What were the weaknesses of your planning? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  • #6: Did you manage your time well? Did you complete your project on time or would your products have improved with additional time? What would you have done if you had more time to produce your work?
  • #7: Compare your work to similar existing products and discuss the similarities and differences
  • #8: Does your work sound good? Was it creative? What aspects of your product’s audio do you like? What would you improve? How would you improve it? Discuss the strengths and weaknesses
  • #9: How have you appealed to your target audience? What specific bits of content would appeal to your target audience. Make reference to specific recordings, dialogue, music and sound effects
  • #15: What changes would you make to your product based upon your peer feedback and why?