A Survey of Various Data Communication Schemes in WSN

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 67
A survey of various data communication schemes in WSN
Amarpreet Kaur, Manwinder Singh
M.tech in Electronics and Communication Engineering, Rayat Institute of Engineering and Information
Technology, Railmajra, India
Associate Prof in Electronics and Communication Engineering, Rayat Institute of Engineering and Information
Technology, Railmajra, India
---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - A Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) comprises of
an extensive number of sensor hubs which areconveyedovera
territory to perform neighborhoodcalculationsinviewofdata
accumulated from the environment. Some imperative
parameters should be concern while playing out a directing
calculation or methodology in the middle of the various hubs.
A most extreme use of assets need to concern while we can
expand the lifetime of a system directinghubs. Inthis paperwe
will review about the different conventions which are now
utilized by various procedures in WSN. This review paper
analyses and screen the execution of remote sensor arrange
calculations, in light of various parameters, for example,
organize lifetime, vitality utilization, delay, throughput,
bundle conveyance proportion and drop proportion and so
forth.
Key Words: WSN, Energy Efficiency, Data Clustering.
Cluster Head, Energy Efficient protocols, fuzzy logic
1. INTRODUCTION
With progress in innovation, sensor systems made out of
little and practical detecting gadgets furnished with remote
radio handset for condition observing have turned out to be
doable. The key preferred standpoint of utilizing these little
gadgets to screen the earth is that it doesn't require
framework, for example,electric mains forpowersupplyand
wired lines for Internet associations with gather
information, nor require human cooperation while
conveying. [1] These sensor hubs can screen the earth by
gathering data from their environment, and work helpfully
to send the information to a base station, or sink, for
examination.
Bunching in WSN [2]: The way toward gathering the sensor
hubs in a thickly conveyed substantial scalesensorsystem is
known as grouping. The insightful approach to join and
pack the information having a place with a solitary
group is known as information total in bunch based
condition. There are a few issues required with the way
toward grouping in a remote sensor arrange. Initially issue
is, what number of groups ought to be framed that could
improve some execution parameter. Second could be what
number of hubs ought to be taken into a solitary bunch.
Third vital issue is the determination system of bunch head
in a group [3]. Another issue is that client canputsomemore
intense hubs, as far as vitality, in the system which can go
about as a bunch head and other straightforward hub act as
group part as it were.
Wireless Sensor Networks is a remote system comprising of
little hubs with detecting, calculation, and remote
correspondences abilities over short separations. Every
sensor gathers information from the checked territory and
after that it courses information back to the base station BS.
The sensors can be set in the field arbitrarily or in a pre-
decided way. [4] As remote sensor systems comprise of
hundreds to thousands of low-power multi working sensor
hubs, working in an unattended situation, with constrained
computational and detecting capacities. Sensor hubs are
outfitted with little, frequently fundamental batteries with
constrained power capacity [5]. WSN comprise of hundreds
or thousands of little, shoddy, battery-driven, spread-out
hubs bearing a remote modem to fulfill a checkingorcontrol
errand mutually.
1.1 Issues in WSN
The outline of WSNs is impacted by many testing elements.
These elements must be beat so that productive
correspondence can be accomplished in WSNs. Here, a
portion of the directing difficulties and configuration issues
that influence steering process in WSNs.
Security and Privacy: Sensor systems interface intimately
with their physical condition and with individuals,
representing extra security issues. Due to these reasons
current security instruments are deficient for WSNs. These
new limitations posture new research challenges on key
foundation, mystery and confirmation, protection, vigor to
refusal of-administration assaults, secure directing,andhub
catch. To accomplish a safe framework, security must be
coordinated into each segment, since parts planned without
security can turn into a state of assault. Thus, security and
protection ought to be given to each part of framework
outline. One test is the means by which to secure remote
correspondence joins against listening stealthily and
altering. In general, security is a troublesome test for any
framework. The extreme limitations and requesting
conditions of WSN make PC security for these frameworks
much all the more difficult [6].
Scope: In WSNs, every sensor hubgetsa specificperspective
of nature. A given sensor's perspective of nature is
constrained both in range and in exactness; it can just cover

a restricted physical territory of the earth. Subsequently,
region scope is likewise a critical plan parameter in WSNs
[7].
Information Aggregation: Since sensor hubs may create
noteworthy repetitive information, comparative bundles
from various hubs can be totaled so that the quantity of
transmissions is decreased. Information collection is the
blend of information from deferent sources asindicatedbya
specific conglomeration work, e.g., copy concealment,
minima, maxima and normal. This procedure has been
utilized to accomplish vitality proficiency and information
move advancement in various steering conventions [8].
Nature of Service: In a few applications,informationought to
be conveyed inside a specific timeframe fromtheminuteit is
detected; generally theinformationwill befutile.Alongthese
lines limited latency for information conveyance is another
condition for time constrained applications. Nonetheless, in
numerous applications, preservation of vitality, which is
straightforwardly identified with system lifetime, is
considered generally more imperative than the nature of
information sent [8].
Little Storage Size: The capacity size of a sensor hub is little
when contrasted with those in conventional systems. This
limitation of sensor hub makes the remote sensor systems
unsatisfactory to be utilized in applicationsthatrequirehigh
information stockpiling limit. Further, the information
handling and information correspondence winds up
noticeably constrained because of little stockpiling size [9].
Adaptation to internal failure: Somesensorhubsmayfall flat
or be hindered because of absence of energy, physical harm,
or natural obstruction. The disappointments of sensor hubs
ought not to influence the general errand of the sensor
organize. In the event that numerous hubs come up short,
MAC and steering conventions must oblige development of
new connections and courses to the information gathering
base stations [10].
Vitality Efficiency: In remote sensor arrange, vitality is a
principle requirement. The operations of a sensor hub, for
example,informationpreparingandtransmissionarevitality
expending; it is anything but difficulttodepletethevitalityof
the hub amid system operation. This issue winds up plainly
exacerbated by the way that hubs in a few uses of remote
sensor systems are left unattended. For instance, in a field
reconnaissance application, sensorhubsaredisseminatedin
an out of reach domain. Reviving or supplanting the hub
batteries is inconceivable. Moreover, the substitution of all
hub batteries in a substantial range is costlier and
implausible. Consequently, restricted vitality of the hub is a
urgent test for the outline of remote sensor systems [11].
A lot of research has centered to expand the lifetime of the
system. A main consideration for the power utilization in a
sensor hub in sensor system is expected to the transmit
particle of electrons, which increments with the addition of
(1) The measure of information to be transmitted (2) The
separation between the transmitter and the beneficiary. (3)
The crash between hubs. One side to mull over for vitality
viability is that the correspondence conspires, in light of the
fact that it is the fundamental vitalitycustomerin WSNs[12].
It devours seventieth of system vitality. The vitality
utilization isregularlydiminishedwith effectivenessthrough
right group head decision and message minimization in
information reportage. WSNs region unit basicallythesocial
event of remote hubs having limited vitality abilities, zone
unit conveyed discretionarily over a progressively powerful
air, could likewise be versatile or stationary, for watching
physical marvels like dampness, temperature, wellbeing
perception, vibrations, precarious occasions and so forth
[13]. Picking a directing methodology is thatthecenterissue
for get-together and conveying the sparing parcels of
accommodating information to the required goal. So the
steering technique should ensure the littlest sum vitality
utilization prompting expanding the system's life [14]. The
WSNs could likewise be used in the changeability of way of
life exercises or administrations.
1.2 Energy Efficient protocols in WSN
LEACH stands for Low Energy Adaptive Clustering
Hierarchy. Leach is a bunching directingconventionutilizing
probabilistic technique to choose channel leader of a hub
utilizing vitality and threshold conditions. It circulates the
vitality stack similarly among every one of the sensors in a
system. Drain is a self-sorted out and versatile convention
for systems. In LEACH, every one of the hubs contained in a
neighborhood group and a solitary hub among the greater
part of the hubs carries on like a bunch head or base station.
On the off chance that the bunch heads were picked a settled
all through the framework life time, as in ordinary grouping
calculations, it is anything but difficult to see that the
unfortunate sensorsbeengroupheadswouldkick thebucket
rapidly, finishing the helpful lifetime of all hubs having a
place with those groups.[15]
The primary point of LEACH is to make a group of sensor
hubs relies on the quality of got flags and utilize nearby
bunch heads to exchanges the information to the base
stations. The fundamental components of LEACH are as per
the following:
 Localized coordination andcontrol forbunchset-up
and operation.
 Randomized turn of the group "base stations" or
"bunch heads" and the comparing bunches.
 Local pressure to diminish worldwide
correspondence.
PEGASIS remains for Power-Efficient Gathering in Sensor
Information Systems. It is a chain-based power successful
calculation. It depends on taking after two parameters:

 Chaining,
 Data combination
In PEGASIS, every hub can go about as a pioneer of the chain
and chain is likewise developed with the assistance of
ravenous calculation and can introduce by the sensor hubs.
PEGASIS depends on taking after suspicions [17]:
 Sensor hubs have worldwide information of the
system,
 All the hubs are stationary
 Nodes know about the area of every single other
hub.
PEGASIS performs information combination in chain yet
information combination is not performed towardthefinish
of the chain. PEGASIS has leverage over LEACH that
 eliminates the utilization of dynamic groups,
 minimize the contrast between non-pioneer hubs
and pioneer hubs,
 limited number of transmissions,
 One transmission to the base station insidea round.
PEGASIS additionally confront a few issues as LEACH
endures. One of the primary burdens of PEGASIS is that it is
not versatile so it can't be utilized as a part of instance of
remote sensor arranges because of the absence of
information with respect to the hubs as a result of vast
number of hubs.
Regard remains for Hybrid Energy-Efficient Distributed
Clustering. HEED mainly permits to figure Channel head in
view of lingering energy. Here every one of the hubs should
keep up same vitality at the beginning. HEED does not
contain any correspondence overhead soitdidn'tencourage
the productive conveyance of group head hubs over the
system.[16] Drain C convention is use to beat this issue, it is
a brought togetherapproach yetadaptabletopredetermined
number of sensors as it were. Many bunching calculations
are accessible which makes more uniform groups to the
detriment of overhead in group arrangement. One of the
methodologies is HEED which utilizes disseminated
calculations which rush to change over. Regard utilizes a
group development calculation, in which every hub is doled
out with a bunch head likelihood which is the capacity of
their remaining vitality and furthermore correspondence
cost which is the capacity of neighbor vicinity. Group head
likelihood is utilized to choose that whether the sensor hub
is possibility for bunch set out toward this round or not. . In
view of these ad messages, every sensor chooses the
applicant group head with the most reduced
"correspondence cost" (whichcouldbesimplythesensor)as
its conditional bunch head [17][18]. This methodology
proceed till every sensor builds its bunch head likelihood at
every cycle until the group head likelihood is one and the
sensor pronounces itself a "last bunch head" for this round.
The benefit of HEED is that there is no need the worldwide
information in regards to the hubs in a system, it ends the
handling at O(1) round or cycle, it considers that every hub
is a piece of an a single bunch, group heads the conveyed in
an appropriate way.
DEEC remains for appropriated vitality proficient grouping.
It is utilized for heterogeneous remote sensor organizes. In
this convention the proportion between the rest of the
vitality on every hub and normal vitality on the system is
figured and its likelihood proportion is utilizedtochoosethe
group heads. The quantity of revolution on every hubdiffers
alongside the varietiesinintroductoryand remainingvitality
i.e. DEEC changes the revolution on every hub into vitality
[18]. The hubs which have high measure of remaining
vitality and high starting vitality is much reasonable for
bunch head hopeful hub as contrast with the hubs with low
vitality. In this way DEEC can amplify the lifetime of the
system by utilizing heterogeneous mindful bunching
calculations. DEEC can acquire successful messages as
contrast with the traditional bunching calculations. DEEC is
more reasonableforMulti-level heterogeneoussystems[19].
Adolescent stands for Threshold touchy Energy Efficient
sensor Network convention. It is utilized for responsive
systems. It is an application which detects the temperature.
It is more vitality effective convention as contrast with the
customary conventions[17]. Toconquertheconfinementsof
LEACH convention the TEEN convention is produced. It is
the upgraded variant ofLEACHconvention.Adolescentis not
reasonable for extensive scale systems since it needs:
 Randomly pickingbunchheadsbeforetheoccasions
happened. It makes the sensors out of the occasion
area gathering into groups and transmitting
information, causing pointless vitality utilization
and unbalance bunches.
 Choosing the group headswithoutconsideringtheir
leftover vitality. It might pick the sensors with less
vitality as the bunch heads and after that cause
them sudden passing.
 The group heads transmit information to the sink
hub straightforwardly. In this manner one-bounce
transmission mode may bring about the group
heads far from the sink hub rapidly dead.
SEP is a convention which underpins the differences in two
levels of system. Here differing qualities alludes to the
underlying vitality designation to thesensorhubs.Asper the
suppositions of SEP conventionprogressivelyorganizethere
are two sorts of vitality and thus it characterizes the hubs as
propel hubs and ordinary hubs. The main distinction
between propel hubs and typical hubsisthatthepropel hubs
have more measure of vitality as analyzes to the ordinary
hubs. On the premise of starting vitality it allocates the
weighted likelihood to hubs. It likewiseconquerstheissueof
bunch development which exists in LEACH convention.

1.3Fuzzy Logic
Fuzzy logic is a type of numerous esteemed rationales in
which reality estimations of factors might be any genuine
number in the vicinity of 0 and 1. By differentiation, in
Boolean rationale, reality estimations of factors may just be
0 or 1. Fluffy rationale has been stretched out to deal with
the idea of halfway truth, where reality esteem may extend
between totally genuine and totally false. Moreover, when
phonetic factors are utilized, these degrees might be
overseen by particular capacities. Fluffy rationale has been
connected to many fields, from control hypothesis to
counterfeit consciousness. [20]
Established rationale just allows recommendations having
an estimation of truth or deception. The idea of whether
1+1=2 is an outright, changeless and numerical truth.
Notwithstanding, there exist certain suggestions with
variable answers, for example, requesting that different
individuals recognize a shading. The idea of truth doesn't
fall by the wayside, yet rather on methods for speaking to
and thinking over fractional learning when managed, by
amassing every single conceivable result intoa dimensional
range.
Both degrees of truth and probabilities go inthevicinityof0
and 1 and thus may appear to be comparable at first. For
instance, let a 100 ml glass contain 30 ml of water. At that
point we may consider two ideas: unfilled and full. The
significance of each of them can be spoken to by a specific
fluffy set. At that point one may characterize the glass as
being 0.7 voids and 0.3 full. Take note of that the idea of
vacancy would be subjective and in this way would rely on
upon the onlooker or creator. Another planner may,
similarly well, outline a set participation work where the
glass would be viewed as full for all esteems down to 50 ml.
It is basic to understand that fluffy rationale utilizes truth
degrees as a scientific model of the dubiousness marvel
while likelihood is a numerical model of obliviousness.
A fundamental applicationmayportraydifferentsub-scopes
of a ceaseless variable.Forexample,temperature estimation
for automated stopping devices may have a few separate
enrollment capacities characterizing specific temperature
ranges expected to control the brakes appropriately. Each
capacity maps a similar temperature incentive to truth
esteem in the 0 to 1 territory. These truth esteems can then
be utilized to decide how the brakes ought to be controlled.
2. RELATED WORK
1. Buyanjargal, "An Energy EfficientClusteringAlgorithm for
Event-Driven Wireless Sensor Networks (EECED)", In this
paper creator portrays that, Wireless sensors systems are
utilized as a part of numerous territory like natural
reconnaissance, astute building, wellbeing observing, savvy
transportations, and so forth. The WSN contains numerous
little remote gadgets which have a restricted measure of
vitality and memory and these little, independent gadgets
are utilized to detect the information in its environment. It
utilizes numerous vitality productive calculationssoeachall
aspects of the system can work proficiently since it is a
standout amongst the most difficult issues identified with
the WSN. To conquer this issue or downside numerous
analysts build up the Energy Efficient bunch based
conventions like LEACH, DEEC etc. Butnobodyconcentrated
on occasion driven WSN conventions though their principle
thought is on persistent systems. The creator likewise
proposed a calculation LEACH (Low Energy Adaptive
Clustering Hierarchy) which is a vitality productive
convention utilized for WSN. The changed variant of this
convention is named as ldquoenergy proficient bunching
calculation for Event-Driven Wireless Sensor Networks
(EECED). The principle point ofthisconventionistobroaden
the lifetime of the system and it circulates vitality similarly
on every hub. In EECED the hub with the additionally
remaining vitality is best competitor hub for bunch head. In
this the Elector hub is likewise utilized for choosing bunch
head, the part of balloter is to assemble the information
vitality of closest hubs Simulation is use to contrast the
execution of EECED calculation and the LEACH convention.
2. Yan Sun, "Vitality Efficient Routing Protocol in Event-
Driven Wireless Sensor Networks", in this paper it is
clarified by the creator that, to perform steering is a
troublesome procedure if there should be an occurrence of
WSN. In a decade ago colossal number of conventions was
found. In any case, creatorunderlineonEvent-drivenremote
sensor systems. A calculation is utilized to enhance the
nature of information and decline the power utilization of a
system. In these calculations, number of hikes by sensor
hubs when there is no undertaking to perform and number
of testing recurrence created by sensor hubs is decreased to
a degree and the positive input plan is utilized to caution the
sensor hubs when an occasion happens. This calculation
stores the information in parcels and utilizes negative-ACK
to diminish the utilization of data transfer capacity.
3.Samer A. B. Awwad, "Bunch Based Routing Protocol for
Mobile Nodes in Wireless Sensor Network",Inthispaperitis
depicted by the creator that Strength of sensor hubs in WSN
is an issue for transmission of bundles and dispersal of
vitality. In some application both settled and portable hubs
are utilized as a part of a similar system, while now and
again just versatile hubs are utilized. Loss of information
bundle is another issue if there shouldariseanoccurrenceof
portable sensor hubs. To take care of this issue of lost
information parcel a cross layer configuration is executed
between medium get to control (MAC) and system layers. In
this manner a bunch based steering convention is
characterized particularly for portable sensor hubs (CBR-
Mobile).This convention is versatilityandmovementcontrol
convention. The sensor hubs which moves out of the bunch
or don't have any information bundle to transmit are
assigned with a particular restricted schedule vacancy

reassigned to approaching sensor hubs inside the group.
Two sorts of database are utilized to pick up the versatility
and movement control productively. As indicated by this
convention information depends on the quality of the signs.
Information transmission is done in an appropriate
productive way. In CBR-Mobile convention, bunch based
directing and half breed MAC convention is joined together
for portability of sensor hubs. Two time calendars are
utilized as a part of this, first is Schedule timeslots which is
for the transmission of information and another is conflict
timeslots which is utilized for transmission of join
enrollment messages. The execution assessment for this
convention is performed in MATLAB it is watched that it
enhances the proportion of bundle transmission, vitality
utilization deferral and reasonableness in portable systems
as contrast with LEACH-Mobile and AODV conventions.
4. R. Rajeshwari, "Towards Energy Efficient Cluster Based
Approach in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Mobile Sink",
in this paper creator passesonthatSensorsystemsareblend
of numerous sensor hubs. These sensor hubs sense the
information from its environment and send that gathered
information to the basestationsasinformationparcels.Since
the lifetime of sensor hub depends on the vitality of battery,
so it is compulsory to use the vitality utilization by these
hubs. Also, to lessen the battery utilization it is obligatory to
decrease the movement on every last hub alongside the
limited number of transmitted information to the Base
station. By utilizing bunching approachversatility,decreased
vitality utilization and better execution of system can be
acquired. In Clustering approach entire system is isolated
into little groups and each bunch has its group head which is
chosen from the groups itself. Group heads create the total
type of information detected by sensors locally.Thismethod
diminishes the span of the information by era compacted
type of information and this packed information is forward
to the base station for an appropriate sink of the system.
5. Arun K. Kumar, "Vitality EfficientMobileData Collectionin
Wireless Sensor Networks with Delay Reduction utilizes
Wireless Communication", in this creator characterizes that
the lifetime of sensor hubs relies on the vitality devoured by
them So it is must to limit the vitality utilization for longer
presence of the hubs in the system. This additionally
influences the availability and scope of the system. Vitality
utilization can be diminished to a degree by utilizing Special
Mobile Data authority to accumulate the data. The MDC
assembles the information from the Sensor hubs and
transmit it to the sink. There are differentMDCaccessible for
different limitations and suppositions. In any case, in every
one of the models proposed, because of moderate speed of
versatile hubs, the information idleness is typically high.
There is a model used to lessen the informationinactivity for
gathered versatile information. The postponement can be
diminished without influencing the MDC by utilizing
directing based grouping and information accumulation
approach in an aggregate frame or way. In the wake of
reproducing this approach it is acquired that the parcel
postponement is diminished to the greater part of the
deferral in a current approach.
6. Chu-Fu Wang, "A Network Lifetime Enhancement Method
for Sink Relocation and Its Analysis in Wireless Sensor
Networks", in this paper creator clarifies that with the
progression in late patterns of miniaturized scale producing
innovation likewise prompts the headway in the of ease,
low-control, multifunctional sensor hubs for remote
correspondence. Differing detecting applications have
additionally turned into a reality accordingly. These
incorporate ecological checking, interruption discovery,
front line reconnaissance, et cetera. The most effective
method to build the lifetime of the system, by dealing with
the assets use in an ideal way alongside the way toward
detecting is an essential issue in WSN. In a Wireless Sensor
Network, multihoping is utilized to transmittheinformation
to the base station. The lifetime of the system is influenced
generally by those hubs which are close to the sinking point
and these hubs devours more vitality and thusly the vitality
of the system will depleted out beforeanditwill promptsthe
abbreviate the lifetime of the system. To evade
overabundance utilization of vitality Sink movement is
utilized in light of the fact that it maintains a strategic
distance from abundance utilization of vitality by the sensor
hubs. A system known as EASR (Energy Awake Sink
Location) is created for portable sinks in the system. This
procedure (EASR) utilizesthedata ofresidual batteryvitality
on every hub and deals with the scope of transmission for
every last hub and migrates the plan of sink. Some
hypothetical and numerical investigate are utilized to
demonstrate that the EASR strategy can upgrade the system
lifetime of the WSN fundamentally.
7. Shounak Chakraborty,"ANobleApproachforSelfLeaming
and Cluster based Routing Protocol with Power Efficiency in
WSN", in this creator says that, Energy proficiency is the
fundamental thought while creating steering conventionfor
a WSN. For a self-learning,stablebunchingpowerproductive
steering convention a measurable model is proposed. This
model is known a measurable model since it utilizes
different factual capacities like mean, change and standard
deviation to pack the information for transmitting it to the
base station and an edge an incentive to create a caution in
the event of crisis. This strategy use the factual yield of
gathered information and utilize it on accountofcrisisthatit
naturally produces the caution or alarm to the base station
about it. The calculation likewise takes care of the issue of
relating era of both occasional and occasion driven
information. A recreation is done to finish the convention in
which it is acquired that this convention prompts enhanced
power productivity.

3. CONCLUSION
In this paper we show wireless sensor network is comprise
an extensive number of sensorhub.Furthermore,thesehubs
are asset requirement. That is the reason lifetime of the
system is constrained so the different methodologies or
convention has been proposed for expanding the lifetime of
the remote sensor arrange. In this paper we talk about the
information collection is one of the critical methods for
improving the life time of the system. Also, security issues is
information trustworthiness with the assistance of
uprightness we decrease the traded off sensor source hubs
or aggregator hubs from altogether changing the last total
esteem.
REFRENCES
[1]. Buyanjargal, “An Energy Efficient Clustering
Algorithm for Event-Driven Wireless Sensor
Networks (EECED)”, IEEE, pp 1758 – 1763, August,
2009
[2]. Yan Sun, “Energy-Efficient Routing Protocol in
Event-Driven Wireless Sensor Networks”, IEEE, pp
1-5, May 2010
[3]. SamerA. B.Awwad, “Cluster Based RoutingProtocol
for Mobile Nodes in Wireless Sensor Network”,
Springer, DOI 10.1007, pp 251-281, May, 2010
[4]. R.Rajeshwari, “Towards Energy Efficient Cluster
Based Approach In Wireless SensorNetworksUsing
Mobile Sink”, IJETCSE, Volume 13 Issue 1, pp 183-
186, MARCH 2015
[5]. Arun K. Kumar, “Energy-Efficient Mobile Data
Collection in Wireless Sensor Networks with Delay
Reduction using Wireless Communication”, IEEE,
978-1-4244-5489-1
[6]. Chu-Fu Wang, “A Network Lifetime Enhancement
Method for Sink Relocation and Its Analysis in
Wireless Sensor Networks”, IEEE SENSORS
JOURNAL, VOL. 14, NO. 6, pp 1932-1943,JUNE2014
[7]. Shounak Chakraborty, “A Noble Approach for Self
Leaming and Cluster based Routing Protocol with
Power Efficiency in WSN”, IEEE, 978-1-4799-3358-
7, pp 773-777, 2014
[8]. Rui Chen, “An Event and Rule-driven Immune
Clustering Routing Algorithm of Wireless Sensor
Network with Mobile Sink”, IEEE, 978-1-4673-
9323-2, pp 196-202, 2015
[9]. EZ-ZAIDI Asmaa, “Efficient data collection in
wireless sensor networks using mobile sink”, IEEE,
978-1-4799-7391-0, Vol:14, 2014
[10]. Priya Vyas, Manoj Chouhan,” SurveyonClustering
Techniques in Wireless Sensor Network”,
International Journal of Computer Science and
Information Technologies, Vol. 5 (5) , 2014, 6614-
661
[11]. Joshi, G. P., Nam, S. Y., Kim, S. W.: “Cognitive Radio
Wireless Sensor Networks:Applications,Challenges
and Research Trends”, Sensors, ISSM: 1424-8220,
Vol.13, No: 9, Aug 12, 2013, pp: 11196-11228.
[12]. Li, X, Merrett, G. V., White, N. M.: “Energy-efficient
data acquisition for accurate signal estimation in
wireless sensor networks”, Journal on wireless
Communications and Networking, Vol. 230, Issue.1,
pp: 1-15, 2013.
[13]. Seada, K., Zuniga, M., Helmy, A., Krishnamachari,
B.: “Energy Efficient Forwarding Strategies for
Geographic Routing in Lossy Wireless Sensor
Networks”, Proceedings of the 2nd international
conference on Embedded networked sensor
systems, USA, ISBN:1-58113-879-2, 2004, pp: 108-
121.
[14]. Mishra, N. K., Jain,V., Sahu, S.:“Survey on Recent
Clustering Algorithms in Wireless Sensor
Networks”, International Journal of Scientific and
Research Publications, ISSN 2250-3153, Vol. 3,
Issue.4, April 2013, pp: 1-4.
[15]. Patil, P., Kulkarni, U. P.: “Energy Efficient
Aggregation With Divergent Sink Placement For
Wireless Sensor Networks”,International Journal of
Ad hoc, Sensor & Ubiquitous Computing (IJASUC),
Vol.4, No.2, pp: 47-58, April 2013.
[16]. Gawali, S. E., Mantri, D. S.: “Lifetime Energy
Efficient Optimization for WSN”, 2nd International
Conference, Computer Technology and
Development, E-ISBN: 978-1-4244-8845-2, Print
ISBN:978-1-4244-8844-5, 2010, pp: 235-239
[17]. Kumar, N., Kumar, M., Patel, R. B.:“ASecure
and Energy Efficient Data Dissemination Protocol
for Wireless Sensor Networks”, International
Journal of Network Security, Vol.15, No.6, pp.490-
500,2012
[18]. Akilandeswari, N., Santhi B., Baranidharan,
B.: “A Survey on Energy ConservationTechniquesIn
Wireless Sensor Networks”, ARPN Journal of
Engineering and Applied Sciences,ISSN 1819-6608,
Vol. 8, No. 4, pp: 265-269 ,April 2013.
[19]. Saini, M., Saini, R. K.: “Solution of Energy-
Efficiency of sensor nodes in Wireless sensor
Networks”, International Journal of Advanced
Research in Computer Science and Software
Engineering, ISSN: 2277 128X, Vol. 3, Issue 5, pp:
353-357, May 2013.
[20]. Khan, A. W., Abdullah,A.H.,Razzaque,M.A.,
Bangash, J. I.: “VGDRA: A Virtual Grid-Based
Dynamic Routes Adjustment Scheme for Mobile
Sink-Based Wireless Sensor Networks”, IEEE
Sensors Journal, Vol. 15, Issue: 1, January 2015, pp:
526-534

A Survey of Various Data Communication Schemes in WSN

More Related Content

What's hot (19)

Similar to A Survey of Various Data Communication Schemes in WSN (20)

More from IRJET Journal (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

A Survey of Various Data Communication Schemes in WSN