Design and Implementation of Encoder for (15, k) Binary BCH Code Using VHDL and eliminating the fan-out

IOSR Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering (IOSR-JECE)
e-ISSN: 2278-2834,p- ISSN: 2278-8735.Volume 7, Issue 6 (Sep. - Oct. 2013), PP 01-06
www.iosrjournals.org
www.iosrjournals.org 1 | Page
Design and Implementation of Encoder for (15, k) Binary BCH
Code Using VHDL and eliminating the fan-out
M. Divya, K. Vinodalakshmi, G. Sumalatha, Shahbazsarik, Abhishek Awasthi
Dept. of ECE, Avanthieng college Hayathnagar, India
Abstract: In this paper we have designed and implemented(15, k) a BCH Encoder on FPGA using VHDL for
reliable data transfers in AWGN channel with multiple error correction control. The digital logic
implementation of binary encoding of multiple error correcting BCH code (15, k) of length n=15 over GF (24
)
with irreducible primitive polynomial x4
+x+1 is organized into shift register circuits. Using the cyclic codes, the
reminder b(x) can be obtained in a linear (15-k) stage shift register with feedback connections corresponding to
the coefficients of the generated polynomial. Three encoder are designed using VHDL to encode the single,
double and triple error correcting BCH code (15, k) corresponding to the coefficient of generated polynomial.
Information bit is transmitted in unchanged form up to k clock cycles and during this period parity bits are
calculated in the LFSR then the parity bits are transmitted from k+1 to 15 clock cycles. Total 15-k numbers of
parity bits with k information bits are transmitted in 15 code word. Here we have implemented (15, 5, 3), (15, 7,
2) and (15, 11, 1) BCH code encoder on Xilinx Spartan 3 FPGA using VHDL and the simulation & synthesis
are done using Xilinx ISE 13.3. BCH encoders are conventionally implemented by linear feedback shift register
architecture. Encoders of long BCH codes may suffer from the effect of large fan out, which may reduce the
achievable clock speed. The data rate requirement of optical applications require parallel implementations of
the BCH encoders. Also a comparative performance based on synthesis & simulation on FPGA is presented.
Keywords: BCH, BCH Encoder, FPGA, VHDL, Error Correction, AWGN, LFSR cyclic redundancy
checking, fan out .
I. Introduction
In a noisy channel when the data is transmitted, at the receiver side it is very difficult to retrieve actual
data. It is frequently the case that a digital system must be fully reliable, as a single error may shutdown the
whole system, or cause unacceptable corruption of data, e.g. in a bank account [5], [6]. There are so many error
correcting methods, one of them is liner block code and the simplest block codes are Hamming codes [1]-[4].
They are capable of correcting only one random error and therefore are not practically useful, unless a simple
error control circuit is required. More sophisticated error correcting codes are the Bose, Chaudhuri and
Hocquenghem (BCH) codes that are a generalisation of the Hamming codes for multiple-error correction. The
(Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem) BCH codes form a large class of powerful random error correcting cyclic
codes [7]-[9] having capable of multiple error correction [8].
BCH codes operate over finite fields or Galois fields [7]. The mathematical background concerning
finite fields is well specified and in recent years the hardware implementation of finite fields has been
extensively studied. In recent years there has been an increasing demand for digital transmission and storage
system and it has been accelerated by the rapid development and availability of VLSI technology and digital
processing. Programmable Logic Device (PLD) and Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) [14], [15] has
revolutionized hardware design and its implementation advantages provides various solution like FPGA is fully
reprogrammable and reconfigurable. A design can be automatically converted from the gate level into the layout
structure by the place and route software. Xilinx Inc. offers a wide range of components [12] which offers
millions gate complexity and flip-flops, so even a relatively complex design can be implemented.
Here implementation of encoder for (15, k) BCH code organized by LFSR for single, double and triple
error correction control using VHDL [16], [17] on FPGA presented and also performance compared based on
synthesis and simulation result to understand the device utilization and timing simulation by targeting on Xilinx
Spartan 3S 1000 FPGA and XSA 3S1000 Board of Xess Corporation [13]. For simulation and synthesis Xilinx
ISE 10.1 is used.
The structure of this paper is as follows. Section II contains a brief description of the BCH code and
generated polynomial. Section III contains Encoder Design for multiple error correction. Section IV contains
simulation shows FPGA implementation results.

Design and Implementation of Encoder for (15, k) Binary BCH Code Using VHDL and eliminating
II. Generated Polynomial Of Binary Bch Code Over Gf (24
)
As the BCH code operate in Galois Field [7], it can be defined by two parameters that are length of code
words (n)and the number of error to be corrected t.
A t-error-correcting binary BCH code is capable of correcting any combination of t or fewer errors in a block
of n = 2
m
_1 digits. For any positive integer
m ≥ 3 and t < 2
m-1
, there exists a binary B
BCH code with the followingparameters:
Block length: n = 2
m
_ 1
Number of information bits: k _ n – m*t
Minimum distance: dmin _ 2t + 1.
The generator polynomial of the code is specified in terms of its roots over the Galois field GF (2
m
) which is
explained in [7]. Let _ be a primitive element in GF (2
m
). The generator polynomial g(x) of the code is the
lowest degree polynomial over GF (2), which has
α, α
2
, α
3
, . . . , α
2t
as its roots. [g(α
i
)= 0 for 1α i α2t]
Let _i(x) be the minimum polynomials of _i then g(x) must be the,
g( x)= LCM{φ1( x),φ2( x),........,φ2t( x)} (1)
As the minimal polynomial for conjugate roots are same i.e. asα
i
= (α
i’
)
2l
,αi(x) =αi’ (x), where i = i’ * 2
l
for l α1,
thus generated polynomial g(x) of binary t-error correcting
BCH code of length given by eqn.(1) can be reduced to
g( x)= LCM{φ1( x),φ3( x),........,φ2t-1( x)} (2)
BCH code generated by primitive elements is given in [8]. An irreducible polynomial g(x) of degree m is said
to beprimitive if only if it divides polynomial form of degree n,x
n
+ 1 for n = 2
m
_1. In fact, every binary
primitivepolynomial g(x) of degree m is a factor of x
2m_1
+ 1. A listof primitive polynomial for degree m and for
finding irreducible polynomial is given in [7].
For (15, k) BCH code, let _ be a primitive element of the GF (2
4
) given in [7] such that 1 + α+ α
4
is a
primitive
Polynomial. From [7], [8] we find that minimal polynomials
of α,α
3
,α
5
are
φ1( x)=1+ x + x4
φ3( x)=1+ x + x2
+ x3
+ x4
φ5( x)=1+ x + x2
For single error correcting, BCH code of length n = 24
-1
= 15 is generated by
g(x)=φ1( x)=1+ x + x
4
(3)
Here highest degree is 4 i.e. (n-k = 4), thus the code is a (15, 11) cyclic code with dmin= 3 since the generator
polynomial is code polynomial of weighted 5, the minimum distance of this code is exactly 3.
For double error correcting, BCH code of length n = 15 is generated by
g(x)= LCM{φ1( x),φ3( x)}

= 1+ x
4
+ x
6
+ x
7
+ x
8
(3)
Here highest degree is 8 i.e. (n-k = 8), thus the code is a (15, 7) cyclic code with dmin _ 5.
For triple error correcting, BCH code of length n = 15 is
generated by
g(x)= LCM{φ1 ( x),φ3 ( x),φ5 ( x)}
= 1 + x + x2
+ x4
+ x5
+ x8
+ x10
(4)
Here highest degree is 10 i.e (n-k = 10), thus the code is a (15, 5) cyclic code with dmin _ 7.
III. Design Of Bch Encoder On Fpga
BCH encoder is usually implemented with a serial linear
Feedback shift register (LFSR) architecture [10].
BCH codeword are encoded as
c( x)=x
n−k
∗ i( x)+ b( x) (6)
Where c(x)= c0+ c1x +..... +cn−lx
n−l
i( x)= i0+ i1x +.....+ik−lx
k−l
b( x)= b0+ b1x +.....+ cm−lx
m−l
andcj, ij, bj∈ GF(2).
Then if b(x) is taken to be the polynomial such that
xn−k
∗ i( x)= q( x)∗ q( x)− b( x) (7)
The k data bits will be present in the code word. Using theproperties of cyclic codes [7], the remainder b(x)
can beobtained in a linear (n-k)-stage shift register with feedbackconnections corresponding to the coefficients
of the
generator polynomial
g( x)=1+ g1x +.....+gn−k−lxn−k−l
+xn−k
(8)
Such a circuit is shown on Fig. 2.
On the encoder side, systematic encoding has been used, which makes easier implementation of encoder
which is shown in Fig. 1.
Code blocks
Information Error control
I1 I2 I3 ........ Ik-1 Ik P1 ....... Pn-k-1 Pn-k
k Data bits n-k parity check bits
It is not useful to split the generator polynomial at the encoding side because it will demand more
hardware and control circuitry. Therefore, the polynomial (I) is used as it is for encoding procedure. The digital
logic implementing the encoding algorithms is organized into linear feedback shift-register circuits (LFSR) that
mimic the cyclic shifts and polynomial arithmetic required in the description of cyclic codes. The LFSR block
diagram for (n, k) BCH encoder is shown in Fig.
IV BCH ENCODERArchitecture
Multipl
y by
p(x)
Dividi
ng
m(x)p
(x)
Dividi
ng by
p(x)
Remai
nder
Messa
ge
input
m(x)
Quot
ient

An binary BCH code encodes a -bit message into
an -bit code word. A - bit message
can be considered as the coefficients of a degree
polynomial ,
where . Meanwhile, the
corresponding -bit code rd can
be considered as the coefficients of a degree poly-
nomial , where
. The encoding of BCH codes can
be simply expressed by
where the degree polynomial
is the generator polynomial of the BCH code. Usually,
. However, systematic encoding is generally
desired, since message bits are just part of the code word. The systematic encoding can be implemented by
(1)
where denotes the remainder polynomial of dividing by . The architecture of a systematic BCH
en-
coder is shown in Fig. 1. During the first clock cycles, the two switches are connected to the “a” port, and the -bit
message is input to the LFSR serially with most significant bit (MSB) first.
Meanwhile, the message bits are also sent to the output to form the systematic part of the code word. After clock
cycles, the switches are moved to the “b” port. At this point, the reg-isters contain the coefficients of
. The remainder bits are then shifted out of the registers to the code word output bit by bit to form the remaining
systematic code word bits. For binary BCH, the multipliers in Fig. 1 can be re-placed by connection or no connection
when is “1” or “0,” respectively. The critical path of this architecture consists of two XOR gates, and the
output of the right-most XOR gate is input to all the other XOR gates. In the case of long BCH codes, this architecture
may suffer from the long delay of the right-most XOR gate caused by the large fanout. Although the serial architecture
of BCH encoder is quite straight forward, in the case when it cannot run as fast as the application requirements,
parallel architectures must be employed. Fanout bottle-neck will also exist in parallel architectures.
Steps of Algorithim
set ; ;
set ; ;
loop: while
;
;
;
highest power in ;
final step:
;
;

Simulation Results
Figure1 simulated wave form (15,11,1) BCH Encoder
Figure 2 simulated wave form (15,7,2) BCH Encoder
Figure 3 simulated wave form (15,5,3) BCH Encoder
Synthesis Report
V. Conclusion
The result presented from the synthesis and timing simulation, shows the (15, 5, 3) BCH Encoder is
more advantageous over the other two, according to speed requirement It can correct 3 error at the receiver side
when the original data corrupt by the noise. But when considering area then (15, 11, 1) is better which can
correct only 1 bit error. Also redundancy is less and data rate is more in it.
BCH codes have been shown to be excellent error-correcting codes among codes of short lengths. They
are simple to encode and relatively simple to decode. Due to these qualities, there is much interest in the exact
capabilities of these codes. The speed and device utilization can be improved by adopting parallel approach
methods.
Cell:in->out (15,11,1)BCH (15,7,2)BCH (15,5,3)BCH
LUT3:I0->O 1 1 1
IBUF:I->O 3 5 7
FDC:D 5 3 2

References
[1]. M.Y. Rhee - “Error Correcting Coding Theory”, McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 1989.
[2]. S. Lin, and D.J. Costello Jr. - “Error Control Coding”, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1983.
[3]. E. R. Berlekamp, “Algebraic coding theory”, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968.
[4]. R.E. Blahut, “Theory and practice of error-control codes”, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1983
[5]. S. B. Wicker, Error Control Systems for Digital Communication andStorage. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 075458: Prentice Hall,
Inc,1995.
[6]. J. H. Derby, “High-speed CRC computation using state-space transformation” in Proc. Global Telecommunications Conf. 2001,
GLOBECOM.
[7]. R. J. Glaise, “A two-step computation of cyclic redundancy code CRC-32 for ATM networks,” IBM J. Res. Dev., vol. 41, pp.
705–709
[8]. K. K. Parhi, VLSI Digital Signal Processing Systems-Design and Imple mentation. New York: Wiley, 1999.
[9]. Goresky, M. and Klapper, A.M. Fibonacci and Galois representations of feedback-with-carry shift registers, IEEE Transactions on
Information Theory, Nov 2002, Volume: 48, On page(s): 2826 –2836.
[10]. Panda Amit K, Rajput P, Shukla B, “Design of Multi Bit LFSRPNRG and Performance comparison on FPGA using VHDL”,
International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Technology (IJAET), Mar 2012, Vol. 3, Issue 1, pp. 566-571
[11]. Xilinx, Inc. Xilinx Libraries Guide, 2011. XessCorp.. XSA-3S1000 Board V1.1 User Manual. Available:
http://xess.com/manuals/xsa-3S-manual-v1_1.pdf. Sept 2007.
[12]. J J.Rose S.D. Brown, R.J. Francis – “Field Programmable GateArrays”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992

Design and Implementation of Encoder for (15, k) Binary BCH Code Using VHDL and eliminating the fan-out

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Design and Implementation of Encoder for (15, k) Binary BCH Code Using VHDL and eliminating the fan-out (20)

More from IOSR Journals (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Design and Implementation of Encoder for (15, k) Binary BCH Code Using VHDL and eliminating the fan-out