SlideShare a Scribd company logo
2
Most read
3
Most read
Krista Port




STATE OF MINNESOTA                                                                DISTRICT COURT

COUNTY OF HENNEPIN                                                 FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
                                                                            CASE TYPE: WRD

Carole Burns, trustee for the next of )
kin of Edmund Burns, decedent, and    )
Carol Burns, individually,            )
                                      )
                      Plaintiffs,     )
                                      )
vs.                                   )                            ANSWER AND CROSS CLAIM
                                      )
Harry’s Cement Mix, Inc., a Minnesota )
Corporation, and Clifford Marcus,     )
                                      )                            Court File No. 00-276
                      Defendants.     )

        Defendant Clifford Marcus, for his answer to the Complaint of the Plaintiffs herein, states

as follows:

                                                   I.

        He admits paragraphs I, II, III, V, and IX of Plaintiffs’ Complaint.

                                                  II.

        He denies paragraph IV of Plaintiffs’ Complaint.

                                                  III.

        He denies that he was negligent as alleged in paragraph VI of said Complaint.

                                                  IV.

        He is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of Plaintiffs’

allegation as to Plaintiff Edmund Burns being injured as found in paragraph VI, and puts

Plaintiffs’ to their proof thereof.
V.

       He is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of

paragraphs VII, VIII, IX, and X and puts Plaintiffs to their proof thereof; and further states that

in the event Plaintiffs suffered damages as alleged, such damages were the result of the

negligence of Plaintiff Edmund Burns.

                                                  VI.

       Except as admitted or otherwise qualified herein, Defendant Clifford Marcus denies each

and every allegation in said Complaint contained.

                                          CROSS CLAIM

       Defendant Clifford Marcus, for his cross claim against Harry’s Cement Mix Inc., states

and alleges as follows:

                                                   I.

       That at the time and place referred to in Plaintiffs’ Complaint, this answering Defendant

was in the course and scope of his employment with Defendant, Harry’s Cement Mix, Inc., and

as a result of his employment, he is entitled to indemnity and/or contribution for the payment of

any damages adjourned against him on behalf of Plaintiffs from Defendant, Harry’s Cement Mix

Inc.

       WHEREFORE, Defendant Clifford Marcus prays for judgment as follows:

   1. Dismissing the Complaint of the Plaintiffs against this answering defendant.




                                                   2
                                           D:ConFacconversion16825506answercrossclaim-130228021223-phpapp01.docx
2. In the event Plaintiffs are awarded judgment against this answering Defendant, he is
      entitled to judgment against Defendant, Harry’s Cement Mix, Inc., for indemnity and/or
      contribution thereof.

   3. For such other and further relief as to the Court may deem just and equitable.

                                                        STEPHENS, BOWEN & JANSEN


                                                        ____________________________________
                                                        Mavis M. Pattee
                                                        Attorney for Plaintiff
                                                        1601 Jefferson Street
                                                        Alexandria, MN 56308
                                                        Tele: (320) 762-4516
                                                        Atty. Reg. No. 77-7777

STATE OF MINNESOTA            )
                              ) SS
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN            )

        Clifford Marcus, being duly sworn, deposes and states that he is the defendant and the
cross claimant in the above entitled action, that he has read the foregoing answer and cross claim,
and that every statement contained therein is within his personal knowledge and is true and
correct.

                                                        ____________________________________
                                                        Clifford Marcus

       Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14th day of February 2012.


                                                        ____________________________________
                                                        Notary Public

       The party(ies) upon whose behalf this pleading is submitted, by and through the
undersigned, hereby acknowledge(s) that sanctions may be imposed for a violation of Minn. Stat.
Section 549.211.

                                                        ____________________________________
                                                        Mavis M. Pattee
                                                        Attorney for Defendant Clifford Marcus



                                                  3
                                          D:ConFacconversion16825506answercrossclaim-130228021223-phpapp01.docx

More Related Content

DOCX
Answer & counterclaim for ms. geiger
DOCX
Pennsylvania Personal Injury Complaint
DOCX
Alistair Jones Discovery Documents
PDF
Answer, Counterclaims & Third Party Claims - Non-Compete & Tortious Interference
PDF
Trina Olsen versus Washoe County School District
PDF
Sample opinion letter
PDF
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS ANSWER
PDF
OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF LAW
Answer & counterclaim for ms. geiger
Pennsylvania Personal Injury Complaint
Alistair Jones Discovery Documents
Answer, Counterclaims & Third Party Claims - Non-Compete & Tortious Interference
Trina Olsen versus Washoe County School District
Sample opinion letter
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS ANSWER
OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF LAW

What's hot (20)

DOCX
FORECLOSURE Response to JP Morgan Chase Foreclosure
PDF
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
PDF
Tort Law: Causation
DOCX
Legal Memorandum
PPTX
Evidence II Presentation (T4Q3).pptx
DOC
Sample opposition to motion to vacate in California with an attorney affidavi...
DOC
Sample motion to dismiss adversary complaint under rule12(b)(6)
DOCX
Personal Injury Complaint
PDF
Sample interoffice memorandum
DOCX
Writing Sample - Memorandum
PDF
Sample trial brief
DOCX
Handouts for Spoliation of Evidence
PDF
Answer counterclaim and 3rd party complaint
PDF
Premise liability memo
DOC
Sample California motion for protective order regarding interrogatories
PDF
Alistair Jones Motion for Summary Judgment
PDF
Law School Writing Sample - Interoffice Memorandum
DOCX
reply to plaintiff's demurrer
PDF
Sample opinion letter
DOC
Sample notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41 in United States District ...
FORECLOSURE Response to JP Morgan Chase Foreclosure
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Tort Law: Causation
Legal Memorandum
Evidence II Presentation (T4Q3).pptx
Sample opposition to motion to vacate in California with an attorney affidavi...
Sample motion to dismiss adversary complaint under rule12(b)(6)
Personal Injury Complaint
Sample interoffice memorandum
Writing Sample - Memorandum
Sample trial brief
Handouts for Spoliation of Evidence
Answer counterclaim and 3rd party complaint
Premise liability memo
Sample California motion for protective order regarding interrogatories
Alistair Jones Motion for Summary Judgment
Law School Writing Sample - Interoffice Memorandum
reply to plaintiff's demurrer
Sample opinion letter
Sample notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41 in United States District ...
Ad

Answer cross claim

  • 1. Krista Port STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASE TYPE: WRD Carole Burns, trustee for the next of ) kin of Edmund Burns, decedent, and ) Carol Burns, individually, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ANSWER AND CROSS CLAIM ) Harry’s Cement Mix, Inc., a Minnesota ) Corporation, and Clifford Marcus, ) ) Court File No. 00-276 Defendants. ) Defendant Clifford Marcus, for his answer to the Complaint of the Plaintiffs herein, states as follows: I. He admits paragraphs I, II, III, V, and IX of Plaintiffs’ Complaint. II. He denies paragraph IV of Plaintiffs’ Complaint. III. He denies that he was negligent as alleged in paragraph VI of said Complaint. IV. He is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of Plaintiffs’ allegation as to Plaintiff Edmund Burns being injured as found in paragraph VI, and puts Plaintiffs’ to their proof thereof.
  • 2. V. He is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of paragraphs VII, VIII, IX, and X and puts Plaintiffs to their proof thereof; and further states that in the event Plaintiffs suffered damages as alleged, such damages were the result of the negligence of Plaintiff Edmund Burns. VI. Except as admitted or otherwise qualified herein, Defendant Clifford Marcus denies each and every allegation in said Complaint contained. CROSS CLAIM Defendant Clifford Marcus, for his cross claim against Harry’s Cement Mix Inc., states and alleges as follows: I. That at the time and place referred to in Plaintiffs’ Complaint, this answering Defendant was in the course and scope of his employment with Defendant, Harry’s Cement Mix, Inc., and as a result of his employment, he is entitled to indemnity and/or contribution for the payment of any damages adjourned against him on behalf of Plaintiffs from Defendant, Harry’s Cement Mix Inc. WHEREFORE, Defendant Clifford Marcus prays for judgment as follows: 1. Dismissing the Complaint of the Plaintiffs against this answering defendant. 2 D:ConFacconversion16825506answercrossclaim-130228021223-phpapp01.docx
  • 3. 2. In the event Plaintiffs are awarded judgment against this answering Defendant, he is entitled to judgment against Defendant, Harry’s Cement Mix, Inc., for indemnity and/or contribution thereof. 3. For such other and further relief as to the Court may deem just and equitable. STEPHENS, BOWEN & JANSEN ____________________________________ Mavis M. Pattee Attorney for Plaintiff 1601 Jefferson Street Alexandria, MN 56308 Tele: (320) 762-4516 Atty. Reg. No. 77-7777 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Clifford Marcus, being duly sworn, deposes and states that he is the defendant and the cross claimant in the above entitled action, that he has read the foregoing answer and cross claim, and that every statement contained therein is within his personal knowledge and is true and correct. ____________________________________ Clifford Marcus Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14th day of February 2012. ____________________________________ Notary Public The party(ies) upon whose behalf this pleading is submitted, by and through the undersigned, hereby acknowledge(s) that sanctions may be imposed for a violation of Minn. Stat. Section 549.211. ____________________________________ Mavis M. Pattee Attorney for Defendant Clifford Marcus 3 D:ConFacconversion16825506answercrossclaim-130228021223-phpapp01.docx