SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Risk-based Exposure Evaluation Process: Protecting Worker Exposure to
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
Alexandra J. Fields, Dr. Alisa Rich, and Janet Gruner
DISCUSSION / RESULTS
METHODS
CONCLUSION
Thanks to:
Janet Gruner
Kathy Meissner
Dr. Alisa Rich
Alcon Global HSE
The purpose of this project is to support Alcon’s Risk-based Exposure
Evaluation Process (REEP). The objective of REEP is to transfer Novartis’s
decision-making process from a hazard-based approach to a risk-based,
data driven approach in order to protect their pharmaceutical workers’
exposure to active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) during the
manufacturing process.
The first step of REEP is to take an inventory of all the APIs used at the sties,
and then create REEP Assessments. Next, the REEP Assessments are
prioritized based on which APIs could represent the worst case scenarios
when sampled. Breathing zone sampling is carried out at each site, using an
IOM sampler. Sampling data is collected for the duration of time to perform a
task – not an 8-hour time weighted average to avoid underestimating the risk.
During sampling, observation of the unit operation process is conducted and
critiqued. The samples are then sent to a qualified Industrial Hygiene (IH)
laboratory for analysis. Lastly, sampling results are statistically analyzed using
Bayesian Decision Analysis (BDA). BDA is used to calculate the Assigned
Protection Factor (APF) needed for a respirator to protect workers from over-
exposure.
Bayesian Decision Analysis
REEP is a continuous process that is
evolving into a fundamental tool to
track potential exposures, analyze
sampling results, and execute
corrective actions in order to protect
Alcon’s employees from harmful effects
of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients.
These preliminary results revealed the
first set of risk-based API exposure
data for Alcon’s six pharmaceutical
sites. Based on the results,
improvements to multiple levels of
controls such as engineering,
administrative, and respiratory
protection equipment (RPE) are
underway.
From January 2015 – March 2016, all
six pharmaceutical sites collected a
combined total of 57 samples for 8
different APIs. 31 out of the 57
sampling results were above the
Novartis Internal Occupational
Exposure Limit (NIOEL) – about 54%.
After analysis and discussion with the
sites, the main contributing factors to
the high exposure results were found
to be:
1. Poor Worker Practices
2. Not Utilizing Engineering
Controls
3. Rare Steps in the Process
4. Poor Process Design
The sampling results which came back
under the NIOEL provided confirmation
that the engineering controls and
established worker practices are
effective at protecting the workers from
exposure.
INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND
Plant A
API
Sampling
Date
NIOEL
(µg/m3)
Results
(µg/m3)
Tobramycin 17-Jun-15 150 726
Tobramycin 21-Jul-15 150 95.3
Pilocarpine HCl 23-Oct-15 50 14.8
Dexamethasone 14-Dec-15 8 7.46
62.9% certainty that an APF of 10 is
sufficient; 95.1% certainty that an
APF of 50 is sufficient

More Related Content

PDF
Risk Management Presentation Public
DOCX
Event tracking for real time unaware sensitivity analysis
PDF
Event tracking for real time unaware sensitivity analysis
PPT
General salespresentation
PDF
Process-flow CHART.
PPTX
Ihra ai hce2013 presentation - 05232013 - revisedmm
PPT
Are You Ready For Your Next Air Quality Facility Inspection?
PPTX
Data Integrity in a GxP-regulated Environment - Pauwels Consulting Academy
Risk Management Presentation Public
Event tracking for real time unaware sensitivity analysis
Event tracking for real time unaware sensitivity analysis
General salespresentation
Process-flow CHART.
Ihra ai hce2013 presentation - 05232013 - revisedmm
Are You Ready For Your Next Air Quality Facility Inspection?
Data Integrity in a GxP-regulated Environment - Pauwels Consulting Academy

What's hot (14)

PPTX
Data integrity & ALCOA+
PDF
Medical Risk Management
PDF
New Vidas Brochure 7-16
PDF
Pharmaceutical Data Integrity@IBA Karachi
PDF
Data Integrity - the ALCOA model
 
PPTX
Lab data integrity
PDF
Data Integrity webinar - Essentials & Solutions
 
PDF
Risk Management for Medical Devices - ISO 14971 Overview
PPTX
Understanding and steering of metallurgical processes
PPTX
Data integrity challenges and solutions
PDF
Data Integrity Training by Dr. A. Amsavel
PDF
Improve insights by aggregating on farm trial data
PDF
Kestrel Biologic Brochure
PPT
Pharma forum 2016 by Maharshi Mehta
Data integrity & ALCOA+
Medical Risk Management
New Vidas Brochure 7-16
Pharmaceutical Data Integrity@IBA Karachi
Data Integrity - the ALCOA model
 
Lab data integrity
Data Integrity webinar - Essentials & Solutions
 
Risk Management for Medical Devices - ISO 14971 Overview
Understanding and steering of metallurgical processes
Data integrity challenges and solutions
Data Integrity Training by Dr. A. Amsavel
Improve insights by aggregating on farm trial data
Kestrel Biologic Brochure
Pharma forum 2016 by Maharshi Mehta
Ad

Similar to API Project Poster (20)

PDF
04_ISPEs_Guides_and_How_They_Apply_to_Cleaning_and_Cleaning_Validation_by_Ste...
PDF
Haccp training guide
PDF
PDF
Environment Monitoring Program.pdf
PDF
Risk Management in Sterile Environments
PPTX
risk management DR Sayantan jana GCLP 2025.pptx
PPTX
Session 05_Risk Assessment Program for YSP_Risk Analysis II
DOC
Osh 4301 evaluate personal exposures/tutorialoutlet
PPTX
Safety testing of Excipients
PPTX
HACCP_Presentation.pptx
PDF
Presentation: Cleaning Validation
PDF
Presentation cleaning-validation
PPTX
corrective and preventive action (CAPA)
DOC
Osh 4301 provide an overview of the results/tutorialoutlet
PPTX
Quality risk management
PDF
Risk management and environmental monitoring
PDF
What is HAZOP?
PPTX
Concept of qa, qc, gmp 112070804010
PPT
Hazop Course 11211111111qqqqqqqqqqq1.ppt
04_ISPEs_Guides_and_How_They_Apply_to_Cleaning_and_Cleaning_Validation_by_Ste...
Haccp training guide
Environment Monitoring Program.pdf
Risk Management in Sterile Environments
risk management DR Sayantan jana GCLP 2025.pptx
Session 05_Risk Assessment Program for YSP_Risk Analysis II
Osh 4301 evaluate personal exposures/tutorialoutlet
Safety testing of Excipients
HACCP_Presentation.pptx
Presentation: Cleaning Validation
Presentation cleaning-validation
corrective and preventive action (CAPA)
Osh 4301 provide an overview of the results/tutorialoutlet
Quality risk management
Risk management and environmental monitoring
What is HAZOP?
Concept of qa, qc, gmp 112070804010
Hazop Course 11211111111qqqqqqqqqqq1.ppt
Ad

API Project Poster

  • 1. Risk-based Exposure Evaluation Process: Protecting Worker Exposure to Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Alexandra J. Fields, Dr. Alisa Rich, and Janet Gruner DISCUSSION / RESULTS METHODS CONCLUSION Thanks to: Janet Gruner Kathy Meissner Dr. Alisa Rich Alcon Global HSE The purpose of this project is to support Alcon’s Risk-based Exposure Evaluation Process (REEP). The objective of REEP is to transfer Novartis’s decision-making process from a hazard-based approach to a risk-based, data driven approach in order to protect their pharmaceutical workers’ exposure to active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) during the manufacturing process. The first step of REEP is to take an inventory of all the APIs used at the sties, and then create REEP Assessments. Next, the REEP Assessments are prioritized based on which APIs could represent the worst case scenarios when sampled. Breathing zone sampling is carried out at each site, using an IOM sampler. Sampling data is collected for the duration of time to perform a task – not an 8-hour time weighted average to avoid underestimating the risk. During sampling, observation of the unit operation process is conducted and critiqued. The samples are then sent to a qualified Industrial Hygiene (IH) laboratory for analysis. Lastly, sampling results are statistically analyzed using Bayesian Decision Analysis (BDA). BDA is used to calculate the Assigned Protection Factor (APF) needed for a respirator to protect workers from over- exposure. Bayesian Decision Analysis REEP is a continuous process that is evolving into a fundamental tool to track potential exposures, analyze sampling results, and execute corrective actions in order to protect Alcon’s employees from harmful effects of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. These preliminary results revealed the first set of risk-based API exposure data for Alcon’s six pharmaceutical sites. Based on the results, improvements to multiple levels of controls such as engineering, administrative, and respiratory protection equipment (RPE) are underway. From January 2015 – March 2016, all six pharmaceutical sites collected a combined total of 57 samples for 8 different APIs. 31 out of the 57 sampling results were above the Novartis Internal Occupational Exposure Limit (NIOEL) – about 54%. After analysis and discussion with the sites, the main contributing factors to the high exposure results were found to be: 1. Poor Worker Practices 2. Not Utilizing Engineering Controls 3. Rare Steps in the Process 4. Poor Process Design The sampling results which came back under the NIOEL provided confirmation that the engineering controls and established worker practices are effective at protecting the workers from exposure. INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND Plant A API Sampling Date NIOEL (µg/m3) Results (µg/m3) Tobramycin 17-Jun-15 150 726 Tobramycin 21-Jul-15 150 95.3 Pilocarpine HCl 23-Oct-15 50 14.8 Dexamethasone 14-Dec-15 8 7.46 62.9% certainty that an APF of 10 is sufficient; 95.1% certainty that an APF of 50 is sufficient