SlideShare a Scribd company logo
+
By:
Nipun Gupta (15)
Adarsh Jain (17)
Shreyansh Kejriwal (26)
Srujana Satyavada (40)
Aprajita Singh (49)
+
Tyre Industry
 Origin of Indian Tyre Industry dates back to 1926 when Dunlop
Rubber Limited set up the first tyre company in West Bengal.
 MRF followed suit in 1946. Since then, the Indian tyre industry has
grown rapidly.
 Indian Tyre Industry now provides direct and indirect employment
to nearly 1 million persons, including dealers, retraders, growers of
Natural Rubber, employment in raw material sector etc.
 While the tyre industry is largely dominated by the organized
sector, the unorganized sector is predominant with respect to
bicycle tyres.
 The total number of tyre dealers, geographically spread all over
the country is over 5,000 - serviced through over 500 depots of
tyre companies.
+
Pre Deal
Conditions
+
Nature of the Industry
 Tyre Industry is highly raw-material intensive. Raw materials cost
accounts for approx. 63% of tyre industry turnover and 72% of
production cost.
 The industry is a major consumer of the domestic rubber market.
Natural rubber constitutes 80% while synthetic rubber constitutes only
20% of the material content in Indian tyres
 62% of total Natural Rubber consumption is by the Tyre Sector,
balance by rubber based non-tyre industries. Interestingly, world-wide,
the proportion of natural to synthetic rubber in tyres is 30:70
 Total weight of raw-materials consumed by tyre industry – 15.50 Lakh
M.T.
 Total Cost of Raw Materials consumed by tyre industry – Rs.16,000
Crores
+
Cooper
 Together with its affiliates, subsidiaries and joint ventures has
manufacturing facilities on three continents, sales and
distribution networks around the world and products that meet
and exceed the demands of the world's most dynamic markets
 Primary focus is passenger car and light vehicle replacement
tires in North America
 An emerging OEM presence
 The 12th largest global tire manufacturer
 The fifth largest tire manufacturer in the U.S.
 Market share in the U.S. is 12 percent in the light vehicle
replacement market
+
Cooper
 Tire safety: Tires are designed and built with great care to
provide thousands of miles of excellent service. For maximum
benefit they must be maintained properly
 HR policy: The company is guided by a strong set of values
that we call "The Cooper Way." The Cooper Way is their
mantra-their way of being and behaving, it represents the
values they hold, and more important, the values they live by
each day
 Help Each other Succeed
 Have Engaged Communication
 Be Agile
 Provide World Class Customer Service
 Be Results Focused
 Do the Right Thing
+
Apollo
 Apollo Tyres Ltd, world's 17th biggest tyre manufacturer, with
annual consolidated revenues of Rs. 14,000 crore (US$2.5
billion) in 2011. It was founded in 1976. Its first plant was
commissioned in Perambra, Thrissur, Kerala. The company
now has four manufacturing units, one in South Africa, two in
Zimbabwe and 1 in Netherlands
 It has a network of over 4,000 dealerships in India, of which
over 2,500 are exclusive outlets. It gets 62.6% of its revenues
from India, 27.9% from Europe and 9.5% from Africa
 Exports reach over 70 destinations across the world.
+
Apollo
 Products
 Engaged in manufacture of automobile tires, tubes and tire re-
treading compound. The product portfolio of the Company consists
of passenger car, SUV, MUV, light truck, truck-bus, agriculture,
industrial, bicycle and off highway tires, retreading material and
tires, and alloy wheels
 HR policy
 The Apollo Way describes five simple values i.e. Business Ethics,
Care for Society, Empowerment, One family and Communicate
openly, as a way of life in the organisation
 Cross geography movements, training and development
strategies, recruitment practices, reward & recognition and
employee motivation strategies are the key focus areas
 Structured process for training and development within the
organisation at both corporate and local level
+ Brief Snapshot of Deal
Acquirers Apollo Mauritius and its Subsidiary: Dutch
Holdco and Merger Subsidiary
Seller Cooper
Acquisition Acquisition by means of merger between Cooper
and Merger Subsidiary
Acquisition Price US$ 35 per share
Total
Consideration
US$ 2.5 billion
+
Reasons of the Deal
 Market Penetration
 Higher Margins Through Alteration Sales Mix
 Improved Distribution Network and Economies of Scale
 Long Term Growth Opportunities
+
Mode of Acquisition
 Agreement and Plan of Merger entered into between
Apollo Mauritius, Dutch Holdco, Merger Subsidiary and
Cooper for the merger of the Merger Subsidiary with and
into Cooper
 As a result of the Merger, the separate corporate
existence of the Merger Subsidiary shall cease Cooper
will continue as the surviving corporation post- Merger, as
an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Apollo
 Each share of Cooper’s common stock issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the
Merger was to be converted into the right to receive US$
35 in cash, without interest
+ Financial Consideration
 Apollo signed an agreement to acquire Cooper for a cash
consideration of ~ US$ 2.5 billion
 Deal would create the world’s seventh ranked tyre company
 Synergy - Management expects potential savings of
$80‐120mn which would accrue over a period of three years
 Apollo agreed to acquire Cooper for ~US$35 per share, a hefty
premium of 40% on Cooper’s 30-day volume-weighted average
stock price
 Deal was unreasonably overpriced given the various market
indicia of Cooper and the global economic conditions
 Apollo justified the deal as a combination of large market
access, a well-established brand and cost-competitive
plants
+
Mode of Funding
 Deal was completely debt-financed
 Standard Chartered sole provider of Deal- US$ 450 M. at the
Apollo Mauritius level to be serviced from the cash flows of Apollo
 US$ 450 M. to be transferred via equity to Dutch Holdco.
 Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank, Standard Chartered Bank and
Goldman Sachs Bank USA to provide committed funding of US$
2.375 B. to the Merged Subsidiary consisted of a US$ 1.875 B
bridge facility and a US$ 500 M revolving credit facility
 The bridge loan to be refinanced by the issue of high-yield junk
bonds to the tune of US$ 1.9 billion with tenure of 7 to 8 years
and coupon in the range of 6.75% to 9.5%
 Bullet repayment on the bonds of US$ 1.9 billion would be at the
end of the tenure of the bonds.
+
Legal and
Regulatory
Implications
+ Regulatory Roadblocks Employment Approval
 At the time of announcement of the Deal, Cooper had
announced that it shall honor the terms of collective bargaining
agreements negotiated with its labor unions after the Merger.
 In September, a U.S arbitrator ruled against Cooper’s sale of
two of its factories to Apollo until a collective bargaining
agreement is reached between Apollo and members of the
plants’ unions.
 Dispute arose as a result of the United Steelworkers (“USW”)
arguing that the terms of the agreement, covering 2,500 USW
members will be violated without Apollo entering into new
collective bargaining agreement with the workers of the above
mentioned plants.
 Cooper had stated that it will be working with Apollo and USW
to resolve worker’s concerns.
 Lawsuit by Cooper
 In light of the unresolved labor disputes at the Cooper
Chengshan facility and the U.S plants, Apollo sought a
reduction in the Merger Consideration of US$ 35 per share,
saying it may not be feasible for Apollo and its lenders to
accept the Deal on the initially agreed pricing terms.
 This prompted Cooper to file a suit against the Acquirers in the
Delaware Chancery Court for expeditious closing of the Deal.
 Apollo sought for the dismissal of the suit, contending that
Cooper has been unable for a matter of months to access
basic financial material in relation to the joint venture about a
significant portion of its business and that Cooper was unable
to deliver all the assets that are part of the Deal.
 Exchange Control Regulations
 The US$ 450 million loan at the Apollo Mauritius level was
guaranteed by Apollo. The provisions of the Master Circular
on Direct Investment by Residents in Joint Venture (JV) /
Wholly Owned Subsidiary (WOS) Abroad (“ODI
Regulations”) permit an Indian company to undertake, in all
its JVs and WOS put together, a total financial commitment
which shall not exceed 400% of the net worth of the Indian
company as on the date of its last audited balance sheet,
under the automatic route.
 Current structure of Apollo says that the company has made
investments in a number of wholly owned subsidiaries in
Mauritius, South Africa, Netherlands, etc.
 For the purpose of calculation of the 400% investment limit,
the aggregate investment of Apollo in all these entities must
have been taken into account.
+
Issues
during the
Deal
+
+
+
Problem with Che Hongzhi
 Cooper Tire has a joint venture with the Chengshan Group called
Cooper Chengshan Tire Co, in which Cooper is the majority
shareholder with a stake of 65 percent.
 Che felt that the deal wasn’t fair to him and wanted that he should be
compensated but Apollo tyres ignored him.
 Moreover the bigger problem was that Apollo wasn’t even aware that
Che had bid for the same company and Cooper didn’t even consider
the proposal and didn’t inform Apollo
 After this, Che made the bid for Cooper at $38 3 more than Apollo’s
bid
+
Contd..
 According to Apollo’s due diligence, Che wouldn’t have
been a problem as Roy Armes had guaranteed that they
had a great working relationship with Che.
 The union and Che pointed that the deal was highly
leveraged and doesn’t guarantee meeting the needs of
the customers and workers
 Standard Chartered bank also asked Apollo to
reconsider the finances of the deal.
 CCT went on strike
 With China facility out-of-bounds the financing of the deal
was slowing down
+
Problem with the USW
 Cooper Tire and USW don’t have a history of getting along well.
 During the economic downturn of 2008, when fuel prices shot up
and US car sales came to a screeching halt, Cooper found itself in
the middle of a crisis
 As a part of due diligence, in early 2013, it was possible that post
the merger announcement, the union might raise a red flag
+
Contd..
 The union had ten demands, which included coverage of two
other plants (not unionised) and one-time bonuses for all union
members among several other conditions. By Apollo’s estimate,
the additional cost of meeting those demands was about $130-
140 million.
 The Apollo met with USW regarding a compensation but couldn’t
reach the settlement
 The USW went to arbitration court and court ruled in favour of
USW and asked them to include the compensation paid to them if
merger went through
+
Performance of
Apollo and Cooper
Post Deal
+
Apollo Tyre- Stock Price
+
Expansion
 Apollo spent Rs.3,800 crore in setting up a factory in Hungary,
the largest outside India for an Indian tyre company.
 It also spend Rs.2,000 crore on expanding the capacity of the
company’s factory in Chennai
 This investment, Kanwar said, will further Apollo’s cause in
becoming a $6 billion company by 2020.
+
Financials
Mar-2015
(in INR Cr.)
Mar-2014
(in INR Cr.)
Mar-2013
(in INR Cr.)
Sales 13,784 14,391 13,740
Expenses 10,767 11,567 11,382
Profit 1,930 1,875 1,456
Profit After
tax
977 1,005 613
EPS (in Rs) 19.18 19.94 12.18
+
Cooper Tyre- Stock Price
+
Cooper-Che Partnership And
Buyback of Shares
 The firm sold its 65 percent stake in CCT in November 2014 for
about $262 million
 Cooper Tire's board of directors also issued a share repurchase
authorization of up to $200 million through December 2016.
 It recently completed a $200 million accelerated share repurchase
program in August 2014 where it bought about 6.4 million shares at
an average price of $31.49 per share
+
Financials
Dec-2014
(in Cr. $)
Dec-2013
(in Cr. $)
Sales 34.24 34.39
Expenses 28.52 29.23
Profit 5.72 5.16
Net Income 2.13 1.11
+
Sectoral Conditions Post Deal
 Stock price recovery for both firms post the failure of the deal
 No significant mergers & acquisitions except of expansion by
Apollo and offloading CCT stake by Cooper
 Leadership rankings of most companies remained more or less
the same
+

More Related Content

PPTX
TATA MOTORS (code of conduct , corporate governance, csr)
PPTX
Tata strategy
PPTX
Hero Honda Joint Venture Split
PPT
Family business in india
PPTX
Changes in management of Tata Group
PDF
Hul and GSK merger
PPTX
Larsen and toubro
TATA MOTORS (code of conduct , corporate governance, csr)
Tata strategy
Hero Honda Joint Venture Split
Family business in india
Changes in management of Tata Group
Hul and GSK merger
Larsen and toubro

What's hot (20)

PPTX
APOLLO TYRES – COOPER TIRE DEAL
PDF
Jaguar land-rover-acquisition-part-1
PPT
Tata Motors & JLR Merger
PPTX
Merger of hutch to vodaf one.pptx
PPTX
Merger & acquisition of tata jaguar & land rover & demerger of hero honda
PPTX
PDF
HDFC_ HDFC BANK MERGER.pdf
PDF
Jaguar Land Rover Acquisition by Tata MotorsJaguar land rover acquisition by ...
PPTX
Tata Corus Acquisition
PPTX
Vodafone and Idea merger ppt
PPTX
Tata jaguar landrover acquisition
PPT
tata corus merger
PPTX
ArcelorMittal Case
DOCX
Legal aspects of mergers and acquisition
PPTX
Mahindra and mahindra strategy
PDF
Formation of a wholly owned subsidiary in india (the process)
PPTX
Tata jlr
PPT
Takeover and takeover defenses
PPTX
hdfc mutual fund
PPTX
Merger of idea and vodafone india
APOLLO TYRES – COOPER TIRE DEAL
Jaguar land-rover-acquisition-part-1
Tata Motors & JLR Merger
Merger of hutch to vodaf one.pptx
Merger & acquisition of tata jaguar & land rover & demerger of hero honda
HDFC_ HDFC BANK MERGER.pdf
Jaguar Land Rover Acquisition by Tata MotorsJaguar land rover acquisition by ...
Tata Corus Acquisition
Vodafone and Idea merger ppt
Tata jaguar landrover acquisition
tata corus merger
ArcelorMittal Case
Legal aspects of mergers and acquisition
Mahindra and mahindra strategy
Formation of a wholly owned subsidiary in india (the process)
Tata jlr
Takeover and takeover defenses
hdfc mutual fund
Merger of idea and vodafone india
Ad

More from Shreyansh Kejriwal (13)

PPTX
Personalities Quiz
PDF
Marketing mackathon solution
PPTX
Crescendo !!!
PDF
Crescendo round1
PPTX
PPT
Web Usage Pattern
PPTX
A Health Bar
PPTX
Importance of a Stress Free Envioronment
PPT
Why satisfied customers defect ??
PPT
Operations and Services Costing
PPTX
Balance Sheet and Ratio Analysis of a Listed Company
DOCX
Comparative Analysis of Starbucks Vs Costa Coffee
Personalities Quiz
Marketing mackathon solution
Crescendo !!!
Crescendo round1
Web Usage Pattern
A Health Bar
Importance of a Stress Free Envioronment
Why satisfied customers defect ??
Operations and Services Costing
Balance Sheet and Ratio Analysis of a Listed Company
Comparative Analysis of Starbucks Vs Costa Coffee
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Session 11-13. Working Capital Management and Cash Budget.pptx
PDF
how_to_earn_50k_monthly_investment_guide.pdf
PDF
way to join Real illuminati agent 0782561496,0756664682
PDF
ECONOMICS AND ENTREPRENEURS LESSONSS AND
PDF
Is Retirement Income a Three Dimensional (3-D) problem_ What is the differenc...
PDF
Bladex Earnings Call Presentation 2Q2025
PPTX
Globalization-of-Religion. Contemporary World
PDF
Why Ignoring Passive Income for Retirees Could Cost You Big.pdf
PDF
Q2 2025 :Lundin Gold Conference Call Presentation_Final.pdf
PPTX
Session 3. Time Value of Money.pptx_finance
PDF
ABriefOverviewComparisonUCP600_ISP8_URDG_758.pdf
PPTX
Who’s winning the race to be the world’s first trillionaire.pptx
PPTX
social-studies-subject-for-high-school-globalization.pptx
PDF
Circular Flow of Income by Dr. S. Malini
PDF
Understanding University Research Expenditures (1)_compressed.pdf
PDF
ADVANCE TAX Reduction using traditional insurance
PPTX
What is next for the Fractional CFO - August 2025
PDF
discourse-2025-02-building-a-trillion-dollar-dream.pdf
PDF
Blockchain Pesa Research by Samuel Mefane
PPTX
Introduction to Essence of Indian traditional knowledge.pptx
Session 11-13. Working Capital Management and Cash Budget.pptx
how_to_earn_50k_monthly_investment_guide.pdf
way to join Real illuminati agent 0782561496,0756664682
ECONOMICS AND ENTREPRENEURS LESSONSS AND
Is Retirement Income a Three Dimensional (3-D) problem_ What is the differenc...
Bladex Earnings Call Presentation 2Q2025
Globalization-of-Religion. Contemporary World
Why Ignoring Passive Income for Retirees Could Cost You Big.pdf
Q2 2025 :Lundin Gold Conference Call Presentation_Final.pdf
Session 3. Time Value of Money.pptx_finance
ABriefOverviewComparisonUCP600_ISP8_URDG_758.pdf
Who’s winning the race to be the world’s first trillionaire.pptx
social-studies-subject-for-high-school-globalization.pptx
Circular Flow of Income by Dr. S. Malini
Understanding University Research Expenditures (1)_compressed.pdf
ADVANCE TAX Reduction using traditional insurance
What is next for the Fractional CFO - August 2025
discourse-2025-02-building-a-trillion-dollar-dream.pdf
Blockchain Pesa Research by Samuel Mefane
Introduction to Essence of Indian traditional knowledge.pptx

Apollo-Copper Merger and Acquisition

  • 1. + By: Nipun Gupta (15) Adarsh Jain (17) Shreyansh Kejriwal (26) Srujana Satyavada (40) Aprajita Singh (49)
  • 2. + Tyre Industry  Origin of Indian Tyre Industry dates back to 1926 when Dunlop Rubber Limited set up the first tyre company in West Bengal.  MRF followed suit in 1946. Since then, the Indian tyre industry has grown rapidly.  Indian Tyre Industry now provides direct and indirect employment to nearly 1 million persons, including dealers, retraders, growers of Natural Rubber, employment in raw material sector etc.  While the tyre industry is largely dominated by the organized sector, the unorganized sector is predominant with respect to bicycle tyres.  The total number of tyre dealers, geographically spread all over the country is over 5,000 - serviced through over 500 depots of tyre companies.
  • 4. + Nature of the Industry  Tyre Industry is highly raw-material intensive. Raw materials cost accounts for approx. 63% of tyre industry turnover and 72% of production cost.  The industry is a major consumer of the domestic rubber market. Natural rubber constitutes 80% while synthetic rubber constitutes only 20% of the material content in Indian tyres  62% of total Natural Rubber consumption is by the Tyre Sector, balance by rubber based non-tyre industries. Interestingly, world-wide, the proportion of natural to synthetic rubber in tyres is 30:70  Total weight of raw-materials consumed by tyre industry – 15.50 Lakh M.T.  Total Cost of Raw Materials consumed by tyre industry – Rs.16,000 Crores
  • 5. + Cooper  Together with its affiliates, subsidiaries and joint ventures has manufacturing facilities on three continents, sales and distribution networks around the world and products that meet and exceed the demands of the world's most dynamic markets  Primary focus is passenger car and light vehicle replacement tires in North America  An emerging OEM presence  The 12th largest global tire manufacturer  The fifth largest tire manufacturer in the U.S.  Market share in the U.S. is 12 percent in the light vehicle replacement market
  • 6. + Cooper  Tire safety: Tires are designed and built with great care to provide thousands of miles of excellent service. For maximum benefit they must be maintained properly  HR policy: The company is guided by a strong set of values that we call "The Cooper Way." The Cooper Way is their mantra-their way of being and behaving, it represents the values they hold, and more important, the values they live by each day  Help Each other Succeed  Have Engaged Communication  Be Agile  Provide World Class Customer Service  Be Results Focused  Do the Right Thing
  • 7. + Apollo  Apollo Tyres Ltd, world's 17th biggest tyre manufacturer, with annual consolidated revenues of Rs. 14,000 crore (US$2.5 billion) in 2011. It was founded in 1976. Its first plant was commissioned in Perambra, Thrissur, Kerala. The company now has four manufacturing units, one in South Africa, two in Zimbabwe and 1 in Netherlands  It has a network of over 4,000 dealerships in India, of which over 2,500 are exclusive outlets. It gets 62.6% of its revenues from India, 27.9% from Europe and 9.5% from Africa  Exports reach over 70 destinations across the world.
  • 8. + Apollo  Products  Engaged in manufacture of automobile tires, tubes and tire re- treading compound. The product portfolio of the Company consists of passenger car, SUV, MUV, light truck, truck-bus, agriculture, industrial, bicycle and off highway tires, retreading material and tires, and alloy wheels  HR policy  The Apollo Way describes five simple values i.e. Business Ethics, Care for Society, Empowerment, One family and Communicate openly, as a way of life in the organisation  Cross geography movements, training and development strategies, recruitment practices, reward & recognition and employee motivation strategies are the key focus areas  Structured process for training and development within the organisation at both corporate and local level
  • 9. + Brief Snapshot of Deal Acquirers Apollo Mauritius and its Subsidiary: Dutch Holdco and Merger Subsidiary Seller Cooper Acquisition Acquisition by means of merger between Cooper and Merger Subsidiary Acquisition Price US$ 35 per share Total Consideration US$ 2.5 billion
  • 10. + Reasons of the Deal  Market Penetration  Higher Margins Through Alteration Sales Mix  Improved Distribution Network and Economies of Scale  Long Term Growth Opportunities
  • 11. + Mode of Acquisition  Agreement and Plan of Merger entered into between Apollo Mauritius, Dutch Holdco, Merger Subsidiary and Cooper for the merger of the Merger Subsidiary with and into Cooper  As a result of the Merger, the separate corporate existence of the Merger Subsidiary shall cease Cooper will continue as the surviving corporation post- Merger, as an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Apollo  Each share of Cooper’s common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger was to be converted into the right to receive US$ 35 in cash, without interest
  • 12. + Financial Consideration  Apollo signed an agreement to acquire Cooper for a cash consideration of ~ US$ 2.5 billion  Deal would create the world’s seventh ranked tyre company  Synergy - Management expects potential savings of $80‐120mn which would accrue over a period of three years  Apollo agreed to acquire Cooper for ~US$35 per share, a hefty premium of 40% on Cooper’s 30-day volume-weighted average stock price  Deal was unreasonably overpriced given the various market indicia of Cooper and the global economic conditions  Apollo justified the deal as a combination of large market access, a well-established brand and cost-competitive plants
  • 13. + Mode of Funding  Deal was completely debt-financed  Standard Chartered sole provider of Deal- US$ 450 M. at the Apollo Mauritius level to be serviced from the cash flows of Apollo  US$ 450 M. to be transferred via equity to Dutch Holdco.  Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank, Standard Chartered Bank and Goldman Sachs Bank USA to provide committed funding of US$ 2.375 B. to the Merged Subsidiary consisted of a US$ 1.875 B bridge facility and a US$ 500 M revolving credit facility  The bridge loan to be refinanced by the issue of high-yield junk bonds to the tune of US$ 1.9 billion with tenure of 7 to 8 years and coupon in the range of 6.75% to 9.5%  Bullet repayment on the bonds of US$ 1.9 billion would be at the end of the tenure of the bonds.
  • 15. + Regulatory Roadblocks Employment Approval  At the time of announcement of the Deal, Cooper had announced that it shall honor the terms of collective bargaining agreements negotiated with its labor unions after the Merger.  In September, a U.S arbitrator ruled against Cooper’s sale of two of its factories to Apollo until a collective bargaining agreement is reached between Apollo and members of the plants’ unions.  Dispute arose as a result of the United Steelworkers (“USW”) arguing that the terms of the agreement, covering 2,500 USW members will be violated without Apollo entering into new collective bargaining agreement with the workers of the above mentioned plants.  Cooper had stated that it will be working with Apollo and USW to resolve worker’s concerns.
  • 16.  Lawsuit by Cooper  In light of the unresolved labor disputes at the Cooper Chengshan facility and the U.S plants, Apollo sought a reduction in the Merger Consideration of US$ 35 per share, saying it may not be feasible for Apollo and its lenders to accept the Deal on the initially agreed pricing terms.  This prompted Cooper to file a suit against the Acquirers in the Delaware Chancery Court for expeditious closing of the Deal.  Apollo sought for the dismissal of the suit, contending that Cooper has been unable for a matter of months to access basic financial material in relation to the joint venture about a significant portion of its business and that Cooper was unable to deliver all the assets that are part of the Deal.
  • 17.  Exchange Control Regulations  The US$ 450 million loan at the Apollo Mauritius level was guaranteed by Apollo. The provisions of the Master Circular on Direct Investment by Residents in Joint Venture (JV) / Wholly Owned Subsidiary (WOS) Abroad (“ODI Regulations”) permit an Indian company to undertake, in all its JVs and WOS put together, a total financial commitment which shall not exceed 400% of the net worth of the Indian company as on the date of its last audited balance sheet, under the automatic route.  Current structure of Apollo says that the company has made investments in a number of wholly owned subsidiaries in Mauritius, South Africa, Netherlands, etc.  For the purpose of calculation of the 400% investment limit, the aggregate investment of Apollo in all these entities must have been taken into account.
  • 19. +
  • 20. +
  • 21. + Problem with Che Hongzhi  Cooper Tire has a joint venture with the Chengshan Group called Cooper Chengshan Tire Co, in which Cooper is the majority shareholder with a stake of 65 percent.  Che felt that the deal wasn’t fair to him and wanted that he should be compensated but Apollo tyres ignored him.  Moreover the bigger problem was that Apollo wasn’t even aware that Che had bid for the same company and Cooper didn’t even consider the proposal and didn’t inform Apollo  After this, Che made the bid for Cooper at $38 3 more than Apollo’s bid
  • 22. + Contd..  According to Apollo’s due diligence, Che wouldn’t have been a problem as Roy Armes had guaranteed that they had a great working relationship with Che.  The union and Che pointed that the deal was highly leveraged and doesn’t guarantee meeting the needs of the customers and workers  Standard Chartered bank also asked Apollo to reconsider the finances of the deal.  CCT went on strike  With China facility out-of-bounds the financing of the deal was slowing down
  • 23. + Problem with the USW  Cooper Tire and USW don’t have a history of getting along well.  During the economic downturn of 2008, when fuel prices shot up and US car sales came to a screeching halt, Cooper found itself in the middle of a crisis  As a part of due diligence, in early 2013, it was possible that post the merger announcement, the union might raise a red flag
  • 24. + Contd..  The union had ten demands, which included coverage of two other plants (not unionised) and one-time bonuses for all union members among several other conditions. By Apollo’s estimate, the additional cost of meeting those demands was about $130- 140 million.  The Apollo met with USW regarding a compensation but couldn’t reach the settlement  The USW went to arbitration court and court ruled in favour of USW and asked them to include the compensation paid to them if merger went through
  • 25. + Performance of Apollo and Cooper Post Deal
  • 27. + Expansion  Apollo spent Rs.3,800 crore in setting up a factory in Hungary, the largest outside India for an Indian tyre company.  It also spend Rs.2,000 crore on expanding the capacity of the company’s factory in Chennai  This investment, Kanwar said, will further Apollo’s cause in becoming a $6 billion company by 2020.
  • 28. + Financials Mar-2015 (in INR Cr.) Mar-2014 (in INR Cr.) Mar-2013 (in INR Cr.) Sales 13,784 14,391 13,740 Expenses 10,767 11,567 11,382 Profit 1,930 1,875 1,456 Profit After tax 977 1,005 613 EPS (in Rs) 19.18 19.94 12.18
  • 30. + Cooper-Che Partnership And Buyback of Shares  The firm sold its 65 percent stake in CCT in November 2014 for about $262 million  Cooper Tire's board of directors also issued a share repurchase authorization of up to $200 million through December 2016.  It recently completed a $200 million accelerated share repurchase program in August 2014 where it bought about 6.4 million shares at an average price of $31.49 per share
  • 31. + Financials Dec-2014 (in Cr. $) Dec-2013 (in Cr. $) Sales 34.24 34.39 Expenses 28.52 29.23 Profit 5.72 5.16 Net Income 2.13 1.11
  • 32. + Sectoral Conditions Post Deal  Stock price recovery for both firms post the failure of the deal  No significant mergers & acquisitions except of expansion by Apollo and offloading CCT stake by Cooper  Leadership rankings of most companies remained more or less the same
  • 33. +