ASSESSING
FUNCTIONAL DISABILITY

   AMC linear disability score
         DASH score
    Glasgow Outcome Score
    Rankin Disability Score
          Pain scales
Applications
 Measuring self-rated health change after
  surgery (Gummesson, Atroshi and Ekdahl1; BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2003, 4:11)



 Quantifying functional status
Introduction
   “Functional status is now seen as an
    important determinant of patients' quality of
    life and a wide variety of instruments have
    been developed”                                 (Lindeboom R, Vermeulen M, Holman R, de Haan RJ: Activities of
    daily living instruments in clinical neurology. optimizing scales for neurologic assessments Neurology 2003,
    60:738-742)

   Life satisfaction, not number of symptoms
    is the strongest predictor of perceived poor
    health.          (http://www.hqlo.com/content/3/1/28)
                      http://www.hqlo.com/content/3/1/28)
Assessing Disability
Glasgow Outcome Score
   GOS=1 (Good Recovery) Capacity to resume
    normal occupational and social activites, although
    there may be minor physical or mental deficits or
    symptoms.
   GOS=2 (Moderate Disability) Independent and
    can resume almost all activites of daily living.
    Disabled to the extent that they can not participate
    in a variety of social and work activites.
GOS cont’d…
   GOS=3 (Severe Disability) No longer capable of
    engaging in most previous personal, social or
    work activities. Limited communication skills and
    have abnormal behavioural or emotional
    responses. Typically are partially or totally
    dependent on assistance from others in daily
    living.
   GOS=4 (Persistent Vegetative State) Not aware of
    surroundings or purposely responsive to stimuli.
   GOS=5 (Dead)
Rankin Disability Score
   Rankin=0 No symptoms at all
   Rankin=1 No significant disability despite
    symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and
    activities.
   Rankin=2 Slight disability. Unable to carry out all
    normal activities but able to look after own affairs
    without assistance.
   Rankin=3 Moderate disability requiring some help
    but able to walk without assistance.
RDS cont’d…
 Rankin=4 Moderately severe disability.
  Unable to walk without assistance, and
  unable to attend to own bodily needs
  without assistance.
 Rankin=5 Severe disability. Bedridden,
  incontinent and requiring constant nursing
  care and attention.
AMC linear disability score
   79 items (activities) scored as
      Not applicable

      Can do

      Cannot do

   Algorithm can be used as a foundation
    for quantifying functional status
                                    (Health Qual Life Outcomes.
      2005 Dec 29;3:83)


     http://www.hqlo.com/content/2/1/42
Assessing Disability
DASH SCORE
 Score 0 (no deficit) – 100 (severe disability)
 The DASH can detect and differentiate
  small and large changes of disability over
  time after surgery in patients with upper-
  extremity musculoskeletal disorders.
 A 10-point difference in mean DASH score
  may be considered as a minimal important
  change.
CASE STUDY
 Split into 5 groups
 Read through the case study to OH advice
  section
 Carry out DASH assessment and agree
  scores within the group
 Read through OH advice section
 Repeat DASH score using a different pen

More Related Content

PPTX
Assessing disability – world health organization disability assessment
PPTX
Assessing disability – world health organization disability assessment WHO DA...
PPT
Parkinson's disease OT 537
PPT
2015: Fall Prevention and Treatment-Siebens
PPTX
Heather Smith, NYULMC Inservice - FINAL
PPT
Disability & Rehabilitation approach
PPTX
Geriatric assessment
PPTX
Geriatric Rehabilitation
Assessing disability – world health organization disability assessment
Assessing disability – world health organization disability assessment WHO DA...
Parkinson's disease OT 537
2015: Fall Prevention and Treatment-Siebens
Heather Smith, NYULMC Inservice - FINAL
Disability & Rehabilitation approach
Geriatric assessment
Geriatric Rehabilitation

What's hot (8)

PPTX
2015: How do we encourage our patients to exercise?-Linke
PPT
Non-pharmacologic treatment of dementia
PPTX
Assessment and management of complex pain conditions
PPTX
PTA 189 unit 1 ch, 1-4 kk
PPT
Geriatric rehab
PPT
FW279 Addictive Behavior
PDF
Classification of back pain (STOPS) 2012
PPTX
Physiosensing
2015: How do we encourage our patients to exercise?-Linke
Non-pharmacologic treatment of dementia
Assessment and management of complex pain conditions
PTA 189 unit 1 ch, 1-4 kk
Geriatric rehab
FW279 Addictive Behavior
Classification of back pain (STOPS) 2012
Physiosensing
Ad

Similar to Assessing Disability (10)

PPT
G22 outcome & impairment
PPT
Listings Update
PPTX
Outcome scales
PPT
Mc clean outcome assessment_1
PDF
day1(2010 smg training_cardiff)_session2b (1of 2) lewis
PPTX
Outcome Measures for Traumatic Brain Injury
PDF
Disability evaluation
PPTX
Browne Neuro symposium.pptx
PDF
20150300.0 00014
DOCX
Outcome Measures FINAL
G22 outcome & impairment
Listings Update
Outcome scales
Mc clean outcome assessment_1
day1(2010 smg training_cardiff)_session2b (1of 2) lewis
Outcome Measures for Traumatic Brain Injury
Disability evaluation
Browne Neuro symposium.pptx
20150300.0 00014
Outcome Measures FINAL
Ad

More from lmk1970 (7)

PDF
Quality In OH Article
PDF
First Aid In The Office
DOCX
Voc Assessment Article Aohnp
PPT
HAVS presentation IRS conference
PDF
Legal Aspects of OH Article
PPT
Colds And Flu
PPT
Continuing Care In Cancer
Quality In OH Article
First Aid In The Office
Voc Assessment Article Aohnp
HAVS presentation IRS conference
Legal Aspects of OH Article
Colds And Flu
Continuing Care In Cancer

Assessing Disability

  • 1. ASSESSING FUNCTIONAL DISABILITY AMC linear disability score DASH score Glasgow Outcome Score Rankin Disability Score Pain scales
  • 2. Applications  Measuring self-rated health change after surgery (Gummesson, Atroshi and Ekdahl1; BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2003, 4:11)  Quantifying functional status
  • 3. Introduction  “Functional status is now seen as an important determinant of patients' quality of life and a wide variety of instruments have been developed” (Lindeboom R, Vermeulen M, Holman R, de Haan RJ: Activities of daily living instruments in clinical neurology. optimizing scales for neurologic assessments Neurology 2003, 60:738-742)  Life satisfaction, not number of symptoms is the strongest predictor of perceived poor health. (http://www.hqlo.com/content/3/1/28) http://www.hqlo.com/content/3/1/28)
  • 5. Glasgow Outcome Score  GOS=1 (Good Recovery) Capacity to resume normal occupational and social activites, although there may be minor physical or mental deficits or symptoms.  GOS=2 (Moderate Disability) Independent and can resume almost all activites of daily living. Disabled to the extent that they can not participate in a variety of social and work activites.
  • 6. GOS cont’d…  GOS=3 (Severe Disability) No longer capable of engaging in most previous personal, social or work activities. Limited communication skills and have abnormal behavioural or emotional responses. Typically are partially or totally dependent on assistance from others in daily living.  GOS=4 (Persistent Vegetative State) Not aware of surroundings or purposely responsive to stimuli.  GOS=5 (Dead)
  • 7. Rankin Disability Score  Rankin=0 No symptoms at all  Rankin=1 No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities.  Rankin=2 Slight disability. Unable to carry out all normal activities but able to look after own affairs without assistance.  Rankin=3 Moderate disability requiring some help but able to walk without assistance.
  • 8. RDS cont’d…  Rankin=4 Moderately severe disability. Unable to walk without assistance, and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance.  Rankin=5 Severe disability. Bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention.
  • 9. AMC linear disability score  79 items (activities) scored as  Not applicable  Can do  Cannot do  Algorithm can be used as a foundation for quantifying functional status (Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 Dec 29;3:83)  http://www.hqlo.com/content/2/1/42
  • 11. DASH SCORE  Score 0 (no deficit) – 100 (severe disability)  The DASH can detect and differentiate small and large changes of disability over time after surgery in patients with upper- extremity musculoskeletal disorders.  A 10-point difference in mean DASH score may be considered as a minimal important change.
  • 12. CASE STUDY  Split into 5 groups  Read through the case study to OH advice section  Carry out DASH assessment and agree scores within the group  Read through OH advice section  Repeat DASH score using a different pen