SlideShare a Scribd company logo
SUBMITTED BY : 
- PRAKASH MASAGI 
- SHARANBASU JOGUR 
- RAVI LATURKAR
. 
IT ACT 2000 – 
PENALTIES, OFFENCES 
WITH CASE STUDIES
Section 43 - Penalty and Compensation for 
damage to computer, computer system, etc 
case study:By April 2005, the Indian police had 
tipped off to the scam by a U.S. bank, and quickly 
identified the individuals involved in the scam. Arrests 
were made when those individuals attempted to 
withdraw cash from the falsified accounts, $426,000 
was stolen; the amount recovered was $230,000. 
Verdict: Court held that Section 43(a) was applicable 
here due to the nature of unauthorized access involved 
to commit transactions
Section 65 - Tampering with Computer Source 
Documents 
Syed Asifuddin and Ors. Vs. The State of Andhra 
Pradesh 
In this case, Tata Indicom employees were 
arrested for manipulation of the electronic 32- bit 
number (ESN) programmed into cell phones theft 
were exclusively franchised to Reliance Infocomm. 
Verdict: Court held that tampering with source 
code invokes Section 65 of the Information 
Technology Act.
Section 66 - Computer Related Offences 
Kumar v/s Whiteley 
In this case the accused gained unauthorized access to the Joint Academic 
Network (JANET) and deleted, added files and changed the passwords to 
deny access to the authorized users. 
Investigations had revealed that Kumar was logging on to the BSNL 
broadband Internet connection as if he was the authorized genuine user 
and ‘made alteration in the computer database pertaining to broadband 
Internet user accounts’ of the subscribers. 
The CBI had registered a cyber crime case against Kumar and carried out 
investigations on the basis of a complaint by the Press Information Bureau, 
Chennai, which detected the unauthorised use of broadband Internet. The 
complaint also stated that the subscribers had incurred a loss of Rs 38,248 
due to Kumar’s wrongful act. He used to ‘hack’ sites from Bangalore, 
Chennai and other cities too, they said. 
Verdict: 
The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, sentenced 
N G Arun Kumar, the techie from Bangalore to undergo a rigorous 
imprisonment for one year with a fine of Rs 5,000 under section 420 IPC 
(cheating) and Section 66 of IT Act (Computer related Offence).
Section 66A - Punishment for sending offensive 
messages through communication service 
Bomb Hoax mail 
In 2009, a 15-year-old Bangalore teenager was arrested by 
the cyber crime investigation cell (CCIC) of the city crime 
branch for allegedly sending a hoax e-mail to a private 
news channel. In the e-mail, he claimed to have planted 
five bombs in Mumbai, challenging the police to find 
them before it was too late. At around 1p.m. on May 25, 
the news channel received an e-mail that read: “I have 
planted five bombs in Mumbai; you have two hours to 
find it.” The police, who were alerted immediately, traced 
the Internet Protocol (IP) address to Vijay Nagar in 
Bangalore. The Internet service provider for the account 
was BSNL, said officials.
Section 66C - Punishment for identity theft 
The CEO of an identity theft protection company, 
Lifelock, Todd Davis's social security number was 
exposed by Matt Lauer on NBC’s Today Show. Davis’ 
identity was used to obtain a $500 cash advance loan.
Section 66D - Punishment for cheating by 
impersonation by using computer resource 
Section 66E - Punishment for violation of privacy 
Section-66F Cyber Terrorism 
Credit Card Fraud 
Unsuspecting victims would use infected computers 
to make online transactions. 
Provisions Applicable:- Sections 43, 66, 66C, 66D of IT 
Act and section 420 of the IPC.
Section 67 - Punishment for publishing or 
transmitting obscene material in electronic form 
Section 69 - Powers to issue directions for 
interception or monitoring or decryption of any 
information through any computer resource 
Web Defacement 
The homepage of a website is replaced with a 
pornographic or defamatory page. Government sites 
generally face the wrath of hackers on symbolic days. 
Provisions Applicable:- Sections 43 and 66 of IT Act and 
Sections 66F, 67 and 70 of IT Act also apply in some cases
THANK YOU

More Related Content

PPT
Information Technology Act 2000
PPT
IT Act 2000
PPTX
Industry framework of e commerce
PPT
Introduction to cyber law.
PPT
Electronic evidence digital evidence in india
PDF
Information technology Act with Cyber offences .pptx
PPT
Electronic Evidence with Case Laws for Maharashtra Judicial Academy by Prasha...
PPTX
Indian Cyber laws
Information Technology Act 2000
IT Act 2000
Industry framework of e commerce
Introduction to cyber law.
Electronic evidence digital evidence in india
Information technology Act with Cyber offences .pptx
Electronic Evidence with Case Laws for Maharashtra Judicial Academy by Prasha...
Indian Cyber laws

What's hot (20)

PPTX
E contract
PPTX
E contracting in india
PPTX
Cybercrime investigation
PPTX
Tools of E-commerce
PPTX
Information Technology Amendment Act 2008
PPTX
E commerce PPT
PPTX
Copyright issues in cyberspace
PPTX
The information technology act 2000
PPTX
PPT
Cyberlaw An Overview
PPT
P H I S H I N G
PPT
Cybersquattingand its remedies
PPT
Information Technology Act
PPTX
IT act 2008
PPTX
Cyber law in India: Its need & importance
PPTX
trademark issues in cyberspace
PPTX
Right to privacy on internet and Data Protection
PDF
Module 5 e procurement
PPTX
Internet banking - College Project
PPTX
An Introduction to Cyber Law - I.T. Act 2000 (India)
E contract
E contracting in india
Cybercrime investigation
Tools of E-commerce
Information Technology Amendment Act 2008
E commerce PPT
Copyright issues in cyberspace
The information technology act 2000
Cyberlaw An Overview
P H I S H I N G
Cybersquattingand its remedies
Information Technology Act
IT act 2008
Cyber law in India: Its need & importance
trademark issues in cyberspace
Right to privacy on internet and Data Protection
Module 5 e procurement
Internet banking - College Project
An Introduction to Cyber Law - I.T. Act 2000 (India)
Ad

Similar to Assignment on cyber law (20)

DOCX
Cyber laws in India, An overview and relevant cases.
DOCX
Cyber law11
DOCX
Cyber law assignment
DOCX
Cyber law assignment
DOCX
Cyber law assignment
DOCX
Cyber law and ipc codes
DOCX
Cyber law cases
DOCX
Cyber law
DOCX
Cyber law sections under itc act 2000 &cases
DOCX
Cyber law assignment
DOCX
Cyber law cases and sections
DOCX
Cyber law cases and sections (1)
DOCX
Cyber law cases and sections (1)
DOCX
Anil final
DOCX
Cyber assignment
DOCX
Cyber law cases and sections (1)
DOCX
Cyber law assignment
DOCX
Cyber law cases and sections(1)
PPTX
Information Technology Act 2000
DOCX
Shilpa
Cyber laws in India, An overview and relevant cases.
Cyber law11
Cyber law assignment
Cyber law assignment
Cyber law assignment
Cyber law and ipc codes
Cyber law cases
Cyber law
Cyber law sections under itc act 2000 &cases
Cyber law assignment
Cyber law cases and sections
Cyber law cases and sections (1)
Cyber law cases and sections (1)
Anil final
Cyber assignment
Cyber law cases and sections (1)
Cyber law assignment
Cyber law cases and sections(1)
Information Technology Act 2000
Shilpa
Ad

Assignment on cyber law

  • 1. SUBMITTED BY : - PRAKASH MASAGI - SHARANBASU JOGUR - RAVI LATURKAR
  • 2. . IT ACT 2000 – PENALTIES, OFFENCES WITH CASE STUDIES
  • 3. Section 43 - Penalty and Compensation for damage to computer, computer system, etc case study:By April 2005, the Indian police had tipped off to the scam by a U.S. bank, and quickly identified the individuals involved in the scam. Arrests were made when those individuals attempted to withdraw cash from the falsified accounts, $426,000 was stolen; the amount recovered was $230,000. Verdict: Court held that Section 43(a) was applicable here due to the nature of unauthorized access involved to commit transactions
  • 4. Section 65 - Tampering with Computer Source Documents Syed Asifuddin and Ors. Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh In this case, Tata Indicom employees were arrested for manipulation of the electronic 32- bit number (ESN) programmed into cell phones theft were exclusively franchised to Reliance Infocomm. Verdict: Court held that tampering with source code invokes Section 65 of the Information Technology Act.
  • 5. Section 66 - Computer Related Offences Kumar v/s Whiteley In this case the accused gained unauthorized access to the Joint Academic Network (JANET) and deleted, added files and changed the passwords to deny access to the authorized users. Investigations had revealed that Kumar was logging on to the BSNL broadband Internet connection as if he was the authorized genuine user and ‘made alteration in the computer database pertaining to broadband Internet user accounts’ of the subscribers. The CBI had registered a cyber crime case against Kumar and carried out investigations on the basis of a complaint by the Press Information Bureau, Chennai, which detected the unauthorised use of broadband Internet. The complaint also stated that the subscribers had incurred a loss of Rs 38,248 due to Kumar’s wrongful act. He used to ‘hack’ sites from Bangalore, Chennai and other cities too, they said. Verdict: The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, sentenced N G Arun Kumar, the techie from Bangalore to undergo a rigorous imprisonment for one year with a fine of Rs 5,000 under section 420 IPC (cheating) and Section 66 of IT Act (Computer related Offence).
  • 6. Section 66A - Punishment for sending offensive messages through communication service Bomb Hoax mail In 2009, a 15-year-old Bangalore teenager was arrested by the cyber crime investigation cell (CCIC) of the city crime branch for allegedly sending a hoax e-mail to a private news channel. In the e-mail, he claimed to have planted five bombs in Mumbai, challenging the police to find them before it was too late. At around 1p.m. on May 25, the news channel received an e-mail that read: “I have planted five bombs in Mumbai; you have two hours to find it.” The police, who were alerted immediately, traced the Internet Protocol (IP) address to Vijay Nagar in Bangalore. The Internet service provider for the account was BSNL, said officials.
  • 7. Section 66C - Punishment for identity theft The CEO of an identity theft protection company, Lifelock, Todd Davis's social security number was exposed by Matt Lauer on NBC’s Today Show. Davis’ identity was used to obtain a $500 cash advance loan.
  • 8. Section 66D - Punishment for cheating by impersonation by using computer resource Section 66E - Punishment for violation of privacy Section-66F Cyber Terrorism Credit Card Fraud Unsuspecting victims would use infected computers to make online transactions. Provisions Applicable:- Sections 43, 66, 66C, 66D of IT Act and section 420 of the IPC.
  • 9. Section 67 - Punishment for publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form Section 69 - Powers to issue directions for interception or monitoring or decryption of any information through any computer resource Web Defacement The homepage of a website is replaced with a pornographic or defamatory page. Government sites generally face the wrath of hackers on symbolic days. Provisions Applicable:- Sections 43 and 66 of IT Act and Sections 66F, 67 and 70 of IT Act also apply in some cases