SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Atomic Models
The History of Atomic Theory
Mr. DIEGO MOJICA
CHEMISTRY 10th Grade
Atomic Models
DRAW AN ATOM !!!
Atomic Models
 This model of the
atom may look
familiar to you. This is
the Bohr model. In
this model, the
nucleus is orbited by
electrons, which are
in different energy
levels.
 A model uses familiar ideas to
explain unfamiliar facts
observed in nature.
 A model can be changed as
new information is collected.
How did it start?
 The atomic
model has
changed
throughout the
centuries,
starting in 400
BC, when it
looked like a
billiard ball →
Who are these men?
In this lesson, we’ll learn
about the men whose quests
for knowledge about the
fundamental nature of the
universe helped define our
views.
Democritus
 This is the Greek
philosopher Democritus
who began the search for
a description of matter
more than 2400 years
ago.
 He asked: Could
matter be divided into
smaller and smaller
pieces forever, or was
there a limit to the
number of times a
piece of matter could
be divided?
400 BC
Atomos
 His theory: Matter could
not be divided into
smaller and smaller
pieces forever, eventually
the smallest possible
piece would be obtained.
 This piece would be
indivisible.
 He named the smallest
piece of matter “atomos,”
meaning “not to be cut.”
Atomos
 To Democritus, atoms
were small, hard
particles that were all
made of the same
material but were
different shapes and
sizes.
 Atoms were infinite in
number, always
moving and capable
of joining together.
This theory was ignored and
forgotten for more than 2000
years!
Why?
 The eminent
philosophers
of the time,
Aristotle and
Plato, had a
more
respected,
(and
ultimately
wrong)
theory.
Aristotle and Plato favored the earth, fire, air
and water approach to the nature of matter.
Their ideas held sway because of their
eminence as philosophers. The atomos idea
was buried for approximately 2000 years.
Atomic models.ppt
Dalton’s Model
 In the early 1800s,
the English
Chemist John
Dalton performed a
number of
experiments that
eventually led to
the acceptance of
the idea of atoms.
Dalton’s Theory
 He deduced that all
elements are composed of
atoms. Atoms are
indivisible and
indestructible particles.
 Atoms of the same element
are exactly alike.
 Atoms of different elements
are different.
 Compounds are formed by
the joining of atoms of two
or more elements.
.
This theory became one of the
foundations of modern
chemistry.
Thomson’s Plum Pudding
Model
 In 1897, the
English scientist
J.J. Thomson
provided the first
hint that an atom
is made of even
smaller particles.
Thomson Model
 He proposed a
model of the atom
that is sometimes
called the “Plum
Pudding” model.
 Atoms were made
from a positively
charged substance
with negatively
charged electrons
scattered about,
like raisins in a
pudding.
Thomson Model
 Thomson studied
the passage of an
electric current
through a gas.
 As the current
passed through the
gas, it gave off rays
of negatively
charged particles.
Thomson Model
 This surprised
Thomson,
because the
atoms of the gas
were uncharged.
Where had the
negative charges
come from?
Where did
they come
from?
Thomson concluded that the
negative charges came from within
the atom.
A particle smaller than an atom had
to exist.
The atom was divisible!
Thomson called the negatively
charged “corpuscles,” today known
as electrons.
Since the gas was known to be
neutral, having no charge, he
reasoned that there must be
positively charged particles in the
atom.
But he could never find them.
Rutherford’s Gold Foil
Experiment
 In 1908, the
English physicist
Ernest Rutherford
was hard at work
on an experiment
that seemed to
have little to do
with unraveling the
mysteries of the
atomic structure.
 Rutherford’s experiment Involved
firing a stream of tiny positively
charged particles at a thin sheet of
gold foil (2000 atoms thick)
 Most of the positively
charged “bullets” passed
right through the gold
atoms in the sheet of gold
foil without changing
course at all.
 Some of the positively
charged “bullets,”
however, did bounce away
from the gold sheet as if
they had hit something
solid. He knew that
positive charges repel
positive charges.
Atomic models.ppt
 http://chemmovies.unl.edu/ChemAnime/R
UTHERFD/RUTHERFD.html
 http://chemmovies.unl.edu/ChemAnime/R
UTHERFD/RUTHERFD.html
 This could only mean that the gold atoms in the
sheet were mostly open space. Atoms were not
a pudding filled with a positively charged
material.
 Rutherford concluded that an atom had a small,
dense, positively charged center that repelled
his positively charged “bullets.”
 He called the center of the atom the “nucleus”
 The nucleus is tiny compared to the atom as a
whole.
Rutherford
 Rutherford reasoned
that all of an atom’s
positively charged
particles were
contained in the
nucleus. The
negatively charged
particles were
scattered outside the
nucleus around the
atom’s edge.
Bohr Model
 In 1913, the
Danish scientist
Niels Bohr
proposed an
improvement. In
his model, he
placed each
electron in a
specific energy
level.
Bohr Model
 According to
Bohr’s atomic
model, electrons
move in definite
orbits around the
nucleus, much like
planets circle the
sun. These orbits,
or energy levels,
are located at
certain distances
from the nucleus.
Wave Model
Erwin Schrödinger
The Wave Model
 Today’s atomic model is
based on the principles
of wave mechanics.
 According to the theory
of wave mechanics,
electrons do not move
about an atom in a
definite path, like the
planets around the sun.
The Wave Model
 In fact, it is impossible to determine the exact
location of an electron. The probable location of
an electron is based on how much energy the
electron has.
 According to the modern atomic model, at atom
has a small positively charged nucleus
surrounded by a large region in which there are
enough electrons to make an atom neutral.
Electron Cloud:
 A space in which
electrons are likely to be
found.
 Electrons whirl about the
nucleus billions of times
in one second
 They are not moving
around in random
patterns.
 Location of electrons
depends upon how much
energy the electron has.
Electron Cloud:
 Depending on their energy they are locked into a
certain area in the cloud.
 Electrons with the lowest energy are found in
the energy level closest to the nucleus
 Electrons with the highest energy are found
in the outermost energy levels, farther from
the nucleus.
Indivisible Electron Nucleus Orbit Electron
Cloud
Greek X
Dalton X
Thomson X
Rutherford X X
Bohr X X X
Wave X X X
SUMMARY
Year Scientific Experimental findings Atomic model
1808
John Dalton
During the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries scientists
have investigated various aspects of chemical reactions, getting
classical laws of chemistry.
The image of the atom exposed by Dalton in his atomic theory to
explain these laws, is that of tiny spherical particles, indivisible
and unchangeable, equal to each other in each element. (Dalton's atomic model.)
1897
J.J. Thompson
1911
E. Rutherford
1913
Niels Bohr
1926
Erwin Schrödinger
Atomic models.ppt

More Related Content

PPTX
IGCSE Electric Charge.pptx
PPT
SUPERPOSITION PRINCIPLE
PPTX
PPTX
Refraction of light
PPTX
Kirchhoff’s laws
PPTX
Dispersion of light
PPTX
Electric Field Lines | Physics
PPT
electric charge and electric field
IGCSE Electric Charge.pptx
SUPERPOSITION PRINCIPLE
Refraction of light
Kirchhoff’s laws
Dispersion of light
Electric Field Lines | Physics
electric charge and electric field

What's hot (20)

PPTX
COULOMBS LAW
PPTX
Waves physics as level cie
PPT
D4 stellar processes
PPTX
IGCSE PHYSICS: Electromagnetic Effects
PPTX
Converging lenses
PPTX
Huygens' Principle
PPT
Propagation of light
PPT
Sexual Reproduction in Plants
PPT
Telescopes
PPTX
Relativity (1)
PPT
Lenses
PPTX
02 properties of light
PPTX
Pressure
PPT
Refraction
PPTX
LO9 - Thin Film Interference
PPTX
Electric charge and Electric current
PPTX
Wave Motion
PPT
Simple machines
PPTX
Thevenin's theorem
PPTX
Electricity as level
COULOMBS LAW
Waves physics as level cie
D4 stellar processes
IGCSE PHYSICS: Electromagnetic Effects
Converging lenses
Huygens' Principle
Propagation of light
Sexual Reproduction in Plants
Telescopes
Relativity (1)
Lenses
02 properties of light
Pressure
Refraction
LO9 - Thin Film Interference
Electric charge and Electric current
Wave Motion
Simple machines
Thevenin's theorem
Electricity as level
Ad

Similar to Atomic models.ppt (20)

PPT
Atomic Models: Everything You Need to Know
PPT
Atomic structure ppt
PPT
Atomic Structure Ppt
PPT
Atomos
PPT
SCI 10 HISTORY OF ATOMIC MODEL PPT 2-1.ppt
PPT
atomos presentation. grade 11 lesson.ppt
PPT
atomos POWERT POINT PRESENTATION FOR GRADE 8.ppt
PPT
atomos.ppt
PPT
Atomos (1)
PPTX
HISTORY OF ATOMIC MODEL grade 9 topic.pptx
PPT
Atoms
PPT
Chapter 3 - Atoms
PPT
Chemistry ppt
PPT
Atom History Timeline and Structure.ppt
PPT
PPT
Atom models
Atomic Models: Everything You Need to Know
Atomic structure ppt
Atomic Structure Ppt
Atomos
SCI 10 HISTORY OF ATOMIC MODEL PPT 2-1.ppt
atomos presentation. grade 11 lesson.ppt
atomos POWERT POINT PRESENTATION FOR GRADE 8.ppt
atomos.ppt
Atomos (1)
HISTORY OF ATOMIC MODEL grade 9 topic.pptx
Atoms
Chapter 3 - Atoms
Chemistry ppt
Atom History Timeline and Structure.ppt
Atom models
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
ELS_Q1_Module-11_Formation-of-Rock-Layers_v2.pdf
PDF
. Radiology Case Scenariosssssssssssssss
PPTX
Protein & Amino Acid Structures Levels of protein structure (primary, seconda...
PPTX
TOTAL hIP ARTHROPLASTY Presentation.pptx
PDF
lecture 2026 of Sjogren's syndrome l .pdf
PPTX
2Systematics of Living Organisms t-.pptx
PPTX
G5Q1W8 PPT SCIENCE.pptx 2025-2026 GRADE 5
PDF
Sciences of Europe No 170 (2025)
PPTX
neck nodes and dissection types and lymph nodes levels
PPTX
ANEMIA WITH LEUKOPENIA MDS 07_25.pptx htggtftgt fredrctvg
PPTX
Derivatives of integument scales, beaks, horns,.pptx
DOCX
Q1_LE_Mathematics 8_Lesson 5_Week 5.docx
PDF
The scientific heritage No 166 (166) (2025)
PPTX
Vitamins & Minerals: Complete Guide to Functions, Food Sources, Deficiency Si...
PPTX
INTRODUCTION TO EVS | Concept of sustainability
PPT
POSITIONING IN OPERATION THEATRE ROOM.ppt
PDF
AlphaEarth Foundations and the Satellite Embedding dataset
PDF
SEHH2274 Organic Chemistry Notes 1 Structure and Bonding.pdf
PPTX
Microbiology with diagram medical studies .pptx
PPTX
ECG_Course_Presentation د.محمد صقران ppt
ELS_Q1_Module-11_Formation-of-Rock-Layers_v2.pdf
. Radiology Case Scenariosssssssssssssss
Protein & Amino Acid Structures Levels of protein structure (primary, seconda...
TOTAL hIP ARTHROPLASTY Presentation.pptx
lecture 2026 of Sjogren's syndrome l .pdf
2Systematics of Living Organisms t-.pptx
G5Q1W8 PPT SCIENCE.pptx 2025-2026 GRADE 5
Sciences of Europe No 170 (2025)
neck nodes and dissection types and lymph nodes levels
ANEMIA WITH LEUKOPENIA MDS 07_25.pptx htggtftgt fredrctvg
Derivatives of integument scales, beaks, horns,.pptx
Q1_LE_Mathematics 8_Lesson 5_Week 5.docx
The scientific heritage No 166 (166) (2025)
Vitamins & Minerals: Complete Guide to Functions, Food Sources, Deficiency Si...
INTRODUCTION TO EVS | Concept of sustainability
POSITIONING IN OPERATION THEATRE ROOM.ppt
AlphaEarth Foundations and the Satellite Embedding dataset
SEHH2274 Organic Chemistry Notes 1 Structure and Bonding.pdf
Microbiology with diagram medical studies .pptx
ECG_Course_Presentation د.محمد صقران ppt

Atomic models.ppt

  • 1. Atomic Models The History of Atomic Theory Mr. DIEGO MOJICA CHEMISTRY 10th Grade
  • 3. Atomic Models  This model of the atom may look familiar to you. This is the Bohr model. In this model, the nucleus is orbited by electrons, which are in different energy levels.  A model uses familiar ideas to explain unfamiliar facts observed in nature.  A model can be changed as new information is collected.
  • 4. How did it start?  The atomic model has changed throughout the centuries, starting in 400 BC, when it looked like a billiard ball →
  • 5. Who are these men? In this lesson, we’ll learn about the men whose quests for knowledge about the fundamental nature of the universe helped define our views.
  • 6. Democritus  This is the Greek philosopher Democritus who began the search for a description of matter more than 2400 years ago.  He asked: Could matter be divided into smaller and smaller pieces forever, or was there a limit to the number of times a piece of matter could be divided? 400 BC
  • 7. Atomos  His theory: Matter could not be divided into smaller and smaller pieces forever, eventually the smallest possible piece would be obtained.  This piece would be indivisible.  He named the smallest piece of matter “atomos,” meaning “not to be cut.”
  • 8. Atomos  To Democritus, atoms were small, hard particles that were all made of the same material but were different shapes and sizes.  Atoms were infinite in number, always moving and capable of joining together.
  • 9. This theory was ignored and forgotten for more than 2000 years!
  • 10. Why?  The eminent philosophers of the time, Aristotle and Plato, had a more respected, (and ultimately wrong) theory. Aristotle and Plato favored the earth, fire, air and water approach to the nature of matter. Their ideas held sway because of their eminence as philosophers. The atomos idea was buried for approximately 2000 years.
  • 12. Dalton’s Model  In the early 1800s, the English Chemist John Dalton performed a number of experiments that eventually led to the acceptance of the idea of atoms.
  • 13. Dalton’s Theory  He deduced that all elements are composed of atoms. Atoms are indivisible and indestructible particles.  Atoms of the same element are exactly alike.  Atoms of different elements are different.  Compounds are formed by the joining of atoms of two or more elements.
  • 14. . This theory became one of the foundations of modern chemistry.
  • 15. Thomson’s Plum Pudding Model  In 1897, the English scientist J.J. Thomson provided the first hint that an atom is made of even smaller particles.
  • 16. Thomson Model  He proposed a model of the atom that is sometimes called the “Plum Pudding” model.  Atoms were made from a positively charged substance with negatively charged electrons scattered about, like raisins in a pudding.
  • 17. Thomson Model  Thomson studied the passage of an electric current through a gas.  As the current passed through the gas, it gave off rays of negatively charged particles.
  • 18. Thomson Model  This surprised Thomson, because the atoms of the gas were uncharged. Where had the negative charges come from? Where did they come from?
  • 19. Thomson concluded that the negative charges came from within the atom. A particle smaller than an atom had to exist. The atom was divisible! Thomson called the negatively charged “corpuscles,” today known as electrons. Since the gas was known to be neutral, having no charge, he reasoned that there must be positively charged particles in the atom. But he could never find them.
  • 20. Rutherford’s Gold Foil Experiment  In 1908, the English physicist Ernest Rutherford was hard at work on an experiment that seemed to have little to do with unraveling the mysteries of the atomic structure.
  • 21.  Rutherford’s experiment Involved firing a stream of tiny positively charged particles at a thin sheet of gold foil (2000 atoms thick)
  • 22.  Most of the positively charged “bullets” passed right through the gold atoms in the sheet of gold foil without changing course at all.  Some of the positively charged “bullets,” however, did bounce away from the gold sheet as if they had hit something solid. He knew that positive charges repel positive charges.
  • 25.  This could only mean that the gold atoms in the sheet were mostly open space. Atoms were not a pudding filled with a positively charged material.  Rutherford concluded that an atom had a small, dense, positively charged center that repelled his positively charged “bullets.”  He called the center of the atom the “nucleus”  The nucleus is tiny compared to the atom as a whole.
  • 26. Rutherford  Rutherford reasoned that all of an atom’s positively charged particles were contained in the nucleus. The negatively charged particles were scattered outside the nucleus around the atom’s edge.
  • 27. Bohr Model  In 1913, the Danish scientist Niels Bohr proposed an improvement. In his model, he placed each electron in a specific energy level.
  • 28. Bohr Model  According to Bohr’s atomic model, electrons move in definite orbits around the nucleus, much like planets circle the sun. These orbits, or energy levels, are located at certain distances from the nucleus.
  • 30. The Wave Model  Today’s atomic model is based on the principles of wave mechanics.  According to the theory of wave mechanics, electrons do not move about an atom in a definite path, like the planets around the sun.
  • 31. The Wave Model  In fact, it is impossible to determine the exact location of an electron. The probable location of an electron is based on how much energy the electron has.  According to the modern atomic model, at atom has a small positively charged nucleus surrounded by a large region in which there are enough electrons to make an atom neutral.
  • 32. Electron Cloud:  A space in which electrons are likely to be found.  Electrons whirl about the nucleus billions of times in one second  They are not moving around in random patterns.  Location of electrons depends upon how much energy the electron has.
  • 33. Electron Cloud:  Depending on their energy they are locked into a certain area in the cloud.  Electrons with the lowest energy are found in the energy level closest to the nucleus  Electrons with the highest energy are found in the outermost energy levels, farther from the nucleus.
  • 34. Indivisible Electron Nucleus Orbit Electron Cloud Greek X Dalton X Thomson X Rutherford X X Bohr X X X Wave X X X SUMMARY
  • 35. Year Scientific Experimental findings Atomic model 1808 John Dalton During the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries scientists have investigated various aspects of chemical reactions, getting classical laws of chemistry. The image of the atom exposed by Dalton in his atomic theory to explain these laws, is that of tiny spherical particles, indivisible and unchangeable, equal to each other in each element. (Dalton's atomic model.) 1897 J.J. Thompson 1911 E. Rutherford 1913 Niels Bohr 1926 Erwin Schrödinger