SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Backward Design
Backward Design is a process of lesson planning created by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe and introduced in Understanding by Design (1998).This lesson design process concentrates on developing the lesson in a different order than in traditional lesson planning.
How is it different?TraditionalGoals & objectivesActivitiesAssessmentsBackward DesignGoals & objectivesAssessmentsActivities
Identify desired results.Set the vision.  Focus on the big ideas.Create a shared vision.
Departmental activities to focus on
 Enduring Understandings
 Standards (national, state, district)
 Essential QuestionsIdentify desired results.Determine acceptable evidence.Determine how students demonstrate  their knowledge.Focus on assessment before designing the learning activities.Expand the assessment continuum. 
Identify desired results.Determine acceptable evidence.Plan instructional activities:Share best practice.Build in collaboration.Ensure success for all learners.Plan learning experiences and instruction.
Set the vision.  Focus on the big ideas.Create a shared vision.
Departmental activities to focus on:
 Enduring Understandings
 Standards (national, state, district)

More Related Content

PPT
Understanding By Design- The basics
PPTX
Backward Design Unit Sample
PPTX
Backward design:learning with a Purpose LARC 1/29/11
DOCX
Tcsj lesson plan
DOCX
Educ science final product
DOCX
Stem2syllabus.17
DOC
Ubd template 1
PDF
Use of Activity method in classroom
Understanding By Design- The basics
Backward Design Unit Sample
Backward design:learning with a Purpose LARC 1/29/11
Tcsj lesson plan
Educ science final product
Stem2syllabus.17
Ubd template 1
Use of Activity method in classroom

What's hot (20)

DOCX
Ub d lesson template sts ind
PPTX
SPS Inquiry Learning PD Session 1 2015
PPT
Design Chapter 9 - Curriculum Development
PPTX
Measuring Intended Learning Outcomes
PDF
Midterm capstone rubric spring 2017
PPTX
Instructional plan pwpt 1
PDF
S.s. midterm capstone cover sheet spring 2017
PDF
Talk science primer
PPTX
Assignment in 115
DOC
Discussion 1 assure
PPTX
Designing Learner Centered Assessments
DOCX
Stem2syllabus.16
PPT
Effective lessonplanninganddesign
PPTX
The dimensions of professional development moscow 2013
PPT
Instructional design part 1
PPTX
Backward design
PPTX
Classroom Assessment Techniques
PPT
Instructional Practice
PPTX
Understanding by Design in English Language Teaching
PPTX
Class 1 ADLT 670
Ub d lesson template sts ind
SPS Inquiry Learning PD Session 1 2015
Design Chapter 9 - Curriculum Development
Measuring Intended Learning Outcomes
Midterm capstone rubric spring 2017
Instructional plan pwpt 1
S.s. midterm capstone cover sheet spring 2017
Talk science primer
Assignment in 115
Discussion 1 assure
Designing Learner Centered Assessments
Stem2syllabus.16
Effective lessonplanninganddesign
The dimensions of professional development moscow 2013
Instructional design part 1
Backward design
Classroom Assessment Techniques
Instructional Practice
Understanding by Design in English Language Teaching
Class 1 ADLT 670
Ad

Similar to Backward design ah (20)

PPTX
Understanding by Design
PDF
Backwards By Design in the Exemplary Middle School
PDF
Understanding by Design
PPT
UBD and Virtual Project based learning
PDF
Ubd Powerpoint
PPTX
The Backward Design
PPT
Ub d inservice 8.20.12
PDF
UbD - Bridging the Gap
PPT
ubd_file_3.ppt
PPTX
Essential Questions for Enduring Understanding
PPTX
Meth. 4. Understanding by design (UbD)
PPTX
The backward design of history the backward design
PDF
Mathematics
PPT
01 Ubd Pd Jan 2010
PPT
Whitney Backwards Assessment April 2008
PPTX
Stage Iii Lp
PDF
Understanding_by_design_WhitePaper_20250221.pdf
PDF
Designs 2010 Session 2 Secondary
PDF
Understanding by design teaching ellen meier ctsc
PDF
UBD presentation
Understanding by Design
Backwards By Design in the Exemplary Middle School
Understanding by Design
UBD and Virtual Project based learning
Ubd Powerpoint
The Backward Design
Ub d inservice 8.20.12
UbD - Bridging the Gap
ubd_file_3.ppt
Essential Questions for Enduring Understanding
Meth. 4. Understanding by design (UbD)
The backward design of history the backward design
Mathematics
01 Ubd Pd Jan 2010
Whitney Backwards Assessment April 2008
Stage Iii Lp
Understanding_by_design_WhitePaper_20250221.pdf
Designs 2010 Session 2 Secondary
Understanding by design teaching ellen meier ctsc
UBD presentation
Ad

More from Michelle Morley (16)

PDF
Hs i pads
PDF
Scc presentation
PDF
I pad pres
PPTX
Reading night presentation good
PDF
I pads in_mathematics 2
PDF
K 4 lessons
PDF
Fractions
ODP
Mc Teachers
ODP
Sturgis Teachers
ODP
Michelle M Work
PPTX
Grade 5 Math
PPTX
Digital Literacy Portfolios
PPT
PPT
GSSD Math
PPT
Hs i pads
Scc presentation
I pad pres
Reading night presentation good
I pads in_mathematics 2
K 4 lessons
Fractions
Mc Teachers
Sturgis Teachers
Michelle M Work
Grade 5 Math
Digital Literacy Portfolios
GSSD Math

Backward design ah

  • 2. Backward Design is a process of lesson planning created by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe and introduced in Understanding by Design (1998).This lesson design process concentrates on developing the lesson in a different order than in traditional lesson planning.
  • 3. How is it different?TraditionalGoals & objectivesActivitiesAssessmentsBackward DesignGoals & objectivesAssessmentsActivities
  • 4. Identify desired results.Set the vision.  Focus on the big ideas.Create a shared vision.
  • 8.  Essential QuestionsIdentify desired results.Determine acceptable evidence.Determine how students demonstrate their knowledge.Focus on assessment before designing the learning activities.Expand the assessment continuum. 
  • 9. Identify desired results.Determine acceptable evidence.Plan instructional activities:Share best practice.Build in collaboration.Ensure success for all learners.Plan learning experiences and instruction.
  • 10. Set the vision.  Focus on the big ideas.Create a shared vision.
  • 14.  Essential QuestionsIdentify desired results.Determine how students demonstrate their knowledge.Focus on assessment before designing the learning activities.Expand the assessment continuum. Determine acceptable evidence.Plan instructional activities:Share best practice.Build in collaboration.Ensure success for all learners.Plan learning experiences and instruction.Wiggins, G & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • 15. What is important for students to be able to do, know, or perform?What enduring understandings are needed?What provincial standards need to be met?What are the essential questions?Identify Desired Results
  • 16. Enduring UnderstandingsWorth beingfamiliar with.Important to knowand do.“EnduringUnderstanding”Wiggins, G & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • 17. Essential QuestionsGo to the heart of the discipline.Recur naturally throughout one’s learning and in the history of a field.Raise other important questions.Provide subject- and topic- specific doorways to essential questions.Have no one obvious “right” answer.Are deliberately framed to provoke and sustain student interest.Examples
  • 18. Determine Acceptable EvidenceHow will enduring understanding be measured?How will assessments vary?Both formal and informalScopeTime frameSettingStructure
  • 19. Assessment ContinuumObservation/DialogueInformal Checks for understandingPerformance task/projectAcademic promptQuiz/Test
  • 20. W.H.E.R.E.T.O.Where is it going?Hook the students.Explore and equip.Rethink and revise.Exhibit and evaluate.Tailor to the student.Organize

Editor's Notes

  • #4: In traditional lesson planning, goals are supposed to be developed before activities, but often, activities come first and we work instructional objectives around them. For example: “We have an apple theme. How can we use apples in math?”
  • #8: Stage 1: Identify desired resultsWhat should students know, understand, and be able to do? What content is worthy of understanding? What enduring understandings are desired? In Stage 1 we consider our goals, examine established content standards (WNCP), and review curriculum expectations. Because typically we have more content than we can reasonably address within the available time, we must make choices. This first stage in the design process calls for clarity about priorities.Stage 2: Determine acceptable evidenceHow will we know if students have achieved the desired results? What will we accept as evidence of student understanding and proficiency? The backward design orientation suggests that we think about a unit or course in terms of the collected assessment evidence needed to document and validate that the desired learning has been achieved, not simply as content to be covered or as a series of learning activities. This approach encourages teachers and curriculum planners to first “think like an assessor” before designing specific units and lessons, and thus to consider up front how they will determine if students have attained the desired understandings.Stage 3: Plan learning experiences and instructionWith clearly identified results and appropriate evidence of understanding in mind, it is now the time to fully think through the most appropriate instructional activities. Several key questions must be considered at this stage of backward design: What enabling knowledge (facts, concepts, principles) and skills (processes, procedures, strategies) will students need in order to perform effectively and achieve desired results? What activities will equip students with the needed knowledge and skills? What will need to be taught and coached, and how should it best be taught, in light of performance goals? What materials and resources are best suited to accomplish these goals?Note that the specifics of instructional planning—choices about teaching methods, sequence of lessons, and resource materials—can be successfully completed only after we identify desired results and assessments and consider what they imply. Teaching is a means to an end. Having a clear goal helps to focus our planning and guide purposeful action toward the intended results.
  • #10: Assessments:Worth being familiar with and Important to know and do:Traditional quizzes and testsPaper/pencilSelected responseConstructed responseImportant to know and do and Enduring understandingPerformance tasks and projectsOpen endedComplexauthentic