SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Basis for BCS-based Biowaiver
 Prepared by:
Mohamed Abdeen
R&D department
Azal pharmaceutical Co.LTD
 In 1995 the American Department of Health
and Human Services, US Food and Drug
Administration (HHS-FDA) instigated the
Biopharmaceutics Classifi cation System (BCS)
for:
 scale-up and post-approval changes (SUPAC)
According to the HHS-FDA defi nitions,
four possible categories for an API according to the BCS are:
 Class I
◦ High Solubility
◦ High Permeability
 Class II
◦ Low Solubility
◦ High Permeability
 Class III
◦ High Solubility
◦ Low Permeability
 Class IV
◦ Low Solubility
◦ Low Permeability
 the highest single dose is completely
soluble in 250 ml or less of aqueous
solution at pH 1 - 6.8 (37 °C)
♦ highest dose recommended by WHO
(as recommended in the WHO Model List of
Essential Medicines)
or
♦ highest dose strength (if not listed s.o.)
 250 ml: derived from typical BE study protocols
that prescribe the administration of a drug product
to fasting human volunteers with a glass
(approximately 250 ml) water.
 If the highest orally administered dose can be
completely dissolved in this amount of water,
independent of the physiological pH value (hence
the determination over the pH range 1–7.5),
solubility problems are not expected to hinder the
uptake of the API in the small intestine.
♦ Revised EMA guidance: extent of absorption
≥ 85 % (absolute BA or mass balance data)
or ‘known absorption’
♦ FDA guidance: absolute BA >90 %
♦ WHO guidance: extent of absorption at least
85 % in human
site fasted pH fed pH
stomach 1.4 – 2.1 4.3 – 5.4
small intestine:
duodenum 4.9 – 6.4 4.2 – 6.1
jejunum 4.4 – 6.6 5.2 – 6.2
ileum 6.5 – 7.4 6.8 – 7.5
large intestine:
cecum
upper colon
lower colon
6.4
6.0
7.5
♦ PK-studies (e.g. absolute BA or mass-
balance studies)
♦ Human intestinal perfusion studies
♦ Animal models
♦ Caco 2 cell lines or other suitable, validated
cell lines
(in-situ or in-vitro models for passively transported APIs only)
As the BCS is only applicable to APIs which are
absorbed from the small intestine; drugs
absorbed from other sites (e.g. from the oral
cavity) are not eligible for a biowaiver.
• if two products, containing the same
drug, have the same concentration-time
profile at the intestinal membrane
surface then they will have the same rate
and extent of absorption
• same in vivo dissolution profile under all
luminal conditions
 formulation components do not effect
the membrane permeability and/or
intestinal transit
dissolution
drug product  drug substance in
solution
membrane transport
 drug substance in the system
 Dissolution, solubility, and intestinal
permeability are the three major factors
that govern the rate and extent of
absorption of a drug that is stable in the GI
tract.
Solubility
(Drug) High solubility- ensure that solubility
is not likely to limit dissolution and,
therefore, absorption
Dissolution
(Product)
Very rapid/rapid dissolution - ensure that
in vivo dissolution is not likely to be the
“rate determining” step
Permeability
(Drug)
High permeability - ensure that drug
is completely absorbed during the limited
transit time through the small intestine
 An IR drug product is considered VERY RAPIDLY
DISSOLVING when >85% of the labeled amount of
drug substance dissolves within 15 minutes.
Rapid dissolution:
An IR drug product is considered RAPIDLY DISSOLVING
when >85% of the labeled amount of drug substance
dissolves within 30 minutes.
.....is defined as
 in vitro instead of in vivo ‘bioequivalence’
testing
 comparison of test and reference
”BCS-based biowaivers are intended only for
bioequivalence studies. They do not apply to
food effect bioavailability studies or other
pharmacokinetic studies.”
Basis for bcs based biowaiver
 should contain a Class I API(now extent to class II);
 should be rapidly dissolving, meaning it should
release at least 85% of its content in 30 minutes in
three different media (pH 1.2, pH 4.5 and pH 6.8,
composition see “Multisource document”)1 in a
paddle (50 rpm) or basket (100 rpm) apparatus at 37
°C and a volume of 900 ml;
 should not contain excipients which could infl uence
the absorption of theAPI;
 should not contain an API with a narrow therapeutic
index; and
 should not be designed to be absorbed from the oral
cavity.
 The reasoning for the above-mentioned
dissolution restrictions is that when a highly
soluble, highly permeable API dissolves
rapidly, it behaves like a solution in the
gastrointestinal tract. If this is the case, the
pharmaceutical composition of the product is
insignificant, provided that excipient which
influence the uptake across the gut wall are
excluded from the formulation.
 some excipients can influence motility and/or
permeability in the gastrointestinal tract( eg:
mannitol, sorpitol, SLS , etc …)
 If the multisource product under consideration
contains excipients that have been used before in
similar amounts in other formulations of the
same API, it can be reasonably concluded that
these excipients will have no unexpected
consequences for the bioavailability of the
product. If, however, the formulation contains
different excipients, or amounts of the same
excipients that are very different from usual, the
national authority may choose to declare the
biowaiver procedure inapplicable.
a. according to HHS-FDA
 CLASS I
Eligible
 CLASS II
Not eligible
 CLASS III
Not eligible
 CLASS IV
Not eligible
 CLASS I
Eligible
 CLASS II
Eligible only if the D:S is 250 ml or
lower at pH 6.8
 CLASS III
Eligible if very rapidly dissolving
 CLASS IV
Not eligible
For BCS class I :
In vitro comparison of immediate release oral
drug products (T and R):
first option: very rapidly dissolving products;
 Not less than 85 % of labeled amount (12
dosage form)are dissolved within 15 min in
each of three buffers (pH 1.2, pH 4.5 acetate
buffer, pH 6.8 phosphate buffer) using the
paddle apparatus at 75 rpm or the basket
apparatus at 100 rpm – no further profile
comparison of T and R is required.
 reasonable, validated experimental conditions/methods
are strongly recommended!
 Not less than 85 % of labeled amount(12 dosage
form) are dissolved within 30 min in each of three
buffers (pH 1.2, pH 4.5 acetate buffer, pH 6.8
phosphate buffer) using the paddle apparatus at 75
rpm or the basket apparatus at 100 rpm
 Proving similarity of dissolution profiles of
T and R e.g., using f2-test, unless similarity
is obvious.
f2=50 x log {[ 1 + (1/n) t=1n (Rt – Tt)2 ]-0.5 x 100
„identical“ profiles: f2 =100
„similar“ profiles: f2 between 50 and 100
 Two dissolution profiles are considered similar
when the f2 value is $50. To allow the use of
mean data, the coefficient of variation should not
be more than 20% at the earlier time points (e.g.,
10 minutes), and should not be more than 10% at
other time points. Note that when both test and
reference products dissolve 85% or more of the
label amount of the drug in #15 minutes using all
three dissolution media recommended above, the
profile comparison with an f2 test is unnecessary.
very rapidly dissolving products; Not less
than 85 % of labeled amount (12 dosage
form)are dissolved within 15 min in each of
three buffers (pH 1.2, pH 4.5 acetate buffer,
pH 6.8 phosphate buffer) using the paddle
apparatus at 75 rpm or the basket
apparatus at 100 rpm.
 Generally, the risks of an inappropriate
biowaiver decision should be more critically
reviewed (e.g. site-specifi c absorption,
induction/competition at the absorption site,
excipient composition and therapeutic risks)
for products containing BCS Class III APIs
than for BCS Class I drugs.
 These are eligible for a biowaiver provided that
the multisource product:
 is rapidly dissolving, i.e. 85% or more dissolution
of the labelled amount of the API should be
achieved within 30 minutes in standard media at
pH 6.8 using the paddle apparatus at 75 rpm or
the basket apparatus at 100 rpm; and
• the multisource product exhibits similar
dissolution profi les, as determined with the f2
value or equivalent statistical evaluation, to those
of the comparator product in buffers at all three
pH values (pH 1.2, 4.5 and 6.8).
 For multisource products containing BCS
Class II APIs with dose:solubility ratios of 250
ml or less, at pH 6.8, the excipients should
also be critically evaluated in terms of type
and amounts of surfactants in the
formulation.
1. Annex 8 Proposal to waive in vivo bioequivalence
requirements for WHO Model List of Essential Medicines
immediate-release, solid oral dosage forms(2006)
2. WHO Workshop on Prequalification of Medicines
Programme, Abu Dhabi, 11-13 October, 2010.
Basis for bcs based biowaiver

More Related Content

PPTX
Regulatory requirement of EU, MHRA and TGA
PPTX
Cmc, post approval and regulation
PPTX
Similarity and difference factors of dissolution
PPTX
Dissolution f1 and f2 Analysis and IVIVC
PPTX
OUTSOURCING OF BA and BE TO CRO .pptx
PPTX
Investigation of medicinal product dossier (IMPD)
PPTX
Us registration for foreign drugs
PPTX
cmc [ chemistry manufacturing control ]
Regulatory requirement of EU, MHRA and TGA
Cmc, post approval and regulation
Similarity and difference factors of dissolution
Dissolution f1 and f2 Analysis and IVIVC
OUTSOURCING OF BA and BE TO CRO .pptx
Investigation of medicinal product dossier (IMPD)
Us registration for foreign drugs
cmc [ chemistry manufacturing control ]

What's hot (20)

PPTX
IN VIVO AND SCALE-UP PROCESS APPROVAL CHANGES.pptx
PPTX
PPTX
Therapeutics goods administration & Row Countries
PPTX
buccal drug delivery system
PPTX
Paragraph 1,2,3,4 certification usfda
PPTX
DMF Drug Master File
PPTX
Drug product performance , in vivo: bioavailability and bioequivalence
PPTX
Outsourcing BA and BE to CRO
PPTX
PPT
Biowaivers
PPTX
Industry and fda liaison
PPTX
Requirement to clinical study
PPTX
Medical & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)
PPTX
Code of federal regulations {cfr} in pharmaceutical
PPTX
bioequivalence study design
PPTX
CTD and eCTD Seminar.pptx
PPTX
Design and evaluation of bioequivalence
PPTX
Drug master file
PDF
NDA Approval Process.pdf
PPTX
Impd dossier
IN VIVO AND SCALE-UP PROCESS APPROVAL CHANGES.pptx
Therapeutics goods administration & Row Countries
buccal drug delivery system
Paragraph 1,2,3,4 certification usfda
DMF Drug Master File
Drug product performance , in vivo: bioavailability and bioequivalence
Outsourcing BA and BE to CRO
Biowaivers
Industry and fda liaison
Requirement to clinical study
Medical & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)
Code of federal regulations {cfr} in pharmaceutical
bioequivalence study design
CTD and eCTD Seminar.pptx
Design and evaluation of bioequivalence
Drug master file
NDA Approval Process.pdf
Impd dossier
Ad

Similar to Basis for bcs based biowaiver (20)

DOCX
The biopharmaceutics classification system
PPT
Dissolution_Technique.ppt
PPTX
Bio Pharmaceutical Classification BCS.pptx
PPTX
Biopharmaceutics Classification System-based Biowaivers & Comparison of Disso...
PPTX
Biowaver
PPTX
Bio pharmaceutical classification System [BCS]
PDF
biopharmaceuticalclassificationystembcs-160328061345.pdf
PPT
Biowaivers
PPTX
Industrial Pharmacy , unit-I BCS Classification
PDF
Dissolution Test development in regard to bioequivalence
PPT
Bioequivalence in adv.
PPTX
DRUG DISSOLUTION, BIO-AVAILABILITY AND IVIVC DEVELOPMENT
PPTX
Biowaivers
PPTX
Biopharmaceutics classification system
DOC
biopharmaceuticals classification system and biowaiver
PPTX
BIOWAIVERS- Computer Aided Drug Development.pptx
PPTX
DISSOLUTION PRESENTATION, Tical Bio Park, Chennai.
PDF
Biowaiver
PPTX
PDF
Dissolution presentation by subhakanta Dhal
The biopharmaceutics classification system
Dissolution_Technique.ppt
Bio Pharmaceutical Classification BCS.pptx
Biopharmaceutics Classification System-based Biowaivers & Comparison of Disso...
Biowaver
Bio pharmaceutical classification System [BCS]
biopharmaceuticalclassificationystembcs-160328061345.pdf
Biowaivers
Industrial Pharmacy , unit-I BCS Classification
Dissolution Test development in regard to bioequivalence
Bioequivalence in adv.
DRUG DISSOLUTION, BIO-AVAILABILITY AND IVIVC DEVELOPMENT
Biowaivers
Biopharmaceutics classification system
biopharmaceuticals classification system and biowaiver
BIOWAIVERS- Computer Aided Drug Development.pptx
DISSOLUTION PRESENTATION, Tical Bio Park, Chennai.
Biowaiver
Dissolution presentation by subhakanta Dhal
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPT
Copy-Histopathology Practical by CMDA ESUTH CHAPTER(0) - Copy.ppt
PPTX
POLYCYSTIC OVARIAN SYNDROME.pptx by Dr( med) Charles Amoateng
PDF
Therapeutic Potential of Citrus Flavonoids in Metabolic Inflammation and Ins...
PPT
ASRH Presentation for students and teachers 2770633.ppt
PPTX
neonatal infection(7392992y282939y5.pptx
PPTX
ca esophagus molecula biology detailaed molecular biology of tumors of esophagus
PDF
NEET PG 2025 | 200 High-Yield Recall Topics Across All Subjects
PPTX
ACID BASE management, base deficit correction
PPTX
surgery guide for USMLE step 2-part 1.pptx
PPTX
Pathophysiology And Clinical Features Of Peripheral Nervous System .pptx
PDF
Khadir.pdf Acacia catechu drug Ayurvedic medicine
PPTX
CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDER.POWERPOINT PRESENTATIONx
PPTX
post stroke aphasia rehabilitation physician
PDF
Handout_ NURS 220 Topic 10-Abnormal Pregnancy.pdf
PPTX
1 General Principles of Radiotherapy.pptx
DOCX
NEET PG 2025 | Pharmacology Recall: 20 High-Yield Questions Simplified
PPT
MENTAL HEALTH - NOTES.ppt for nursing students
PPTX
Note on Abortion.pptx for the student note
PPTX
Gastroschisis- Clinical Overview 18112311
PPTX
History and examination of abdomen, & pelvis .pptx
Copy-Histopathology Practical by CMDA ESUTH CHAPTER(0) - Copy.ppt
POLYCYSTIC OVARIAN SYNDROME.pptx by Dr( med) Charles Amoateng
Therapeutic Potential of Citrus Flavonoids in Metabolic Inflammation and Ins...
ASRH Presentation for students and teachers 2770633.ppt
neonatal infection(7392992y282939y5.pptx
ca esophagus molecula biology detailaed molecular biology of tumors of esophagus
NEET PG 2025 | 200 High-Yield Recall Topics Across All Subjects
ACID BASE management, base deficit correction
surgery guide for USMLE step 2-part 1.pptx
Pathophysiology And Clinical Features Of Peripheral Nervous System .pptx
Khadir.pdf Acacia catechu drug Ayurvedic medicine
CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDER.POWERPOINT PRESENTATIONx
post stroke aphasia rehabilitation physician
Handout_ NURS 220 Topic 10-Abnormal Pregnancy.pdf
1 General Principles of Radiotherapy.pptx
NEET PG 2025 | Pharmacology Recall: 20 High-Yield Questions Simplified
MENTAL HEALTH - NOTES.ppt for nursing students
Note on Abortion.pptx for the student note
Gastroschisis- Clinical Overview 18112311
History and examination of abdomen, & pelvis .pptx

Basis for bcs based biowaiver

  • 1. Basis for BCS-based Biowaiver  Prepared by: Mohamed Abdeen R&D department Azal pharmaceutical Co.LTD
  • 2.  In 1995 the American Department of Health and Human Services, US Food and Drug Administration (HHS-FDA) instigated the Biopharmaceutics Classifi cation System (BCS) for:  scale-up and post-approval changes (SUPAC)
  • 3. According to the HHS-FDA defi nitions, four possible categories for an API according to the BCS are:  Class I ◦ High Solubility ◦ High Permeability  Class II ◦ Low Solubility ◦ High Permeability  Class III ◦ High Solubility ◦ Low Permeability  Class IV ◦ Low Solubility ◦ Low Permeability
  • 4.  the highest single dose is completely soluble in 250 ml or less of aqueous solution at pH 1 - 6.8 (37 °C) ♦ highest dose recommended by WHO (as recommended in the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines) or ♦ highest dose strength (if not listed s.o.)
  • 5.  250 ml: derived from typical BE study protocols that prescribe the administration of a drug product to fasting human volunteers with a glass (approximately 250 ml) water.  If the highest orally administered dose can be completely dissolved in this amount of water, independent of the physiological pH value (hence the determination over the pH range 1–7.5), solubility problems are not expected to hinder the uptake of the API in the small intestine.
  • 6. ♦ Revised EMA guidance: extent of absorption ≥ 85 % (absolute BA or mass balance data) or ‘known absorption’ ♦ FDA guidance: absolute BA >90 % ♦ WHO guidance: extent of absorption at least 85 % in human
  • 7. site fasted pH fed pH stomach 1.4 – 2.1 4.3 – 5.4 small intestine: duodenum 4.9 – 6.4 4.2 – 6.1 jejunum 4.4 – 6.6 5.2 – 6.2 ileum 6.5 – 7.4 6.8 – 7.5 large intestine: cecum upper colon lower colon 6.4 6.0 7.5
  • 8. ♦ PK-studies (e.g. absolute BA or mass- balance studies) ♦ Human intestinal perfusion studies ♦ Animal models ♦ Caco 2 cell lines or other suitable, validated cell lines (in-situ or in-vitro models for passively transported APIs only)
  • 9. As the BCS is only applicable to APIs which are absorbed from the small intestine; drugs absorbed from other sites (e.g. from the oral cavity) are not eligible for a biowaiver.
  • 10. • if two products, containing the same drug, have the same concentration-time profile at the intestinal membrane surface then they will have the same rate and extent of absorption • same in vivo dissolution profile under all luminal conditions  formulation components do not effect the membrane permeability and/or intestinal transit
  • 11. dissolution drug product  drug substance in solution membrane transport  drug substance in the system  Dissolution, solubility, and intestinal permeability are the three major factors that govern the rate and extent of absorption of a drug that is stable in the GI tract.
  • 12. Solubility (Drug) High solubility- ensure that solubility is not likely to limit dissolution and, therefore, absorption Dissolution (Product) Very rapid/rapid dissolution - ensure that in vivo dissolution is not likely to be the “rate determining” step Permeability (Drug) High permeability - ensure that drug is completely absorbed during the limited transit time through the small intestine
  • 13.  An IR drug product is considered VERY RAPIDLY DISSOLVING when >85% of the labeled amount of drug substance dissolves within 15 minutes. Rapid dissolution: An IR drug product is considered RAPIDLY DISSOLVING when >85% of the labeled amount of drug substance dissolves within 30 minutes.
  • 14. .....is defined as  in vitro instead of in vivo ‘bioequivalence’ testing  comparison of test and reference ”BCS-based biowaivers are intended only for bioequivalence studies. They do not apply to food effect bioavailability studies or other pharmacokinetic studies.”
  • 16.  should contain a Class I API(now extent to class II);  should be rapidly dissolving, meaning it should release at least 85% of its content in 30 minutes in three different media (pH 1.2, pH 4.5 and pH 6.8, composition see “Multisource document”)1 in a paddle (50 rpm) or basket (100 rpm) apparatus at 37 °C and a volume of 900 ml;  should not contain excipients which could infl uence the absorption of theAPI;  should not contain an API with a narrow therapeutic index; and  should not be designed to be absorbed from the oral cavity.
  • 17.  The reasoning for the above-mentioned dissolution restrictions is that when a highly soluble, highly permeable API dissolves rapidly, it behaves like a solution in the gastrointestinal tract. If this is the case, the pharmaceutical composition of the product is insignificant, provided that excipient which influence the uptake across the gut wall are excluded from the formulation.
  • 18.  some excipients can influence motility and/or permeability in the gastrointestinal tract( eg: mannitol, sorpitol, SLS , etc …)  If the multisource product under consideration contains excipients that have been used before in similar amounts in other formulations of the same API, it can be reasonably concluded that these excipients will have no unexpected consequences for the bioavailability of the product. If, however, the formulation contains different excipients, or amounts of the same excipients that are very different from usual, the national authority may choose to declare the biowaiver procedure inapplicable.
  • 19. a. according to HHS-FDA  CLASS I Eligible  CLASS II Not eligible  CLASS III Not eligible  CLASS IV Not eligible
  • 20.  CLASS I Eligible  CLASS II Eligible only if the D:S is 250 ml or lower at pH 6.8  CLASS III Eligible if very rapidly dissolving  CLASS IV Not eligible
  • 21. For BCS class I : In vitro comparison of immediate release oral drug products (T and R): first option: very rapidly dissolving products;  Not less than 85 % of labeled amount (12 dosage form)are dissolved within 15 min in each of three buffers (pH 1.2, pH 4.5 acetate buffer, pH 6.8 phosphate buffer) using the paddle apparatus at 75 rpm or the basket apparatus at 100 rpm – no further profile comparison of T and R is required.  reasonable, validated experimental conditions/methods are strongly recommended!
  • 22.  Not less than 85 % of labeled amount(12 dosage form) are dissolved within 30 min in each of three buffers (pH 1.2, pH 4.5 acetate buffer, pH 6.8 phosphate buffer) using the paddle apparatus at 75 rpm or the basket apparatus at 100 rpm  Proving similarity of dissolution profiles of T and R e.g., using f2-test, unless similarity is obvious. f2=50 x log {[ 1 + (1/n) t=1n (Rt – Tt)2 ]-0.5 x 100 „identical“ profiles: f2 =100 „similar“ profiles: f2 between 50 and 100
  • 23.  Two dissolution profiles are considered similar when the f2 value is $50. To allow the use of mean data, the coefficient of variation should not be more than 20% at the earlier time points (e.g., 10 minutes), and should not be more than 10% at other time points. Note that when both test and reference products dissolve 85% or more of the label amount of the drug in #15 minutes using all three dissolution media recommended above, the profile comparison with an f2 test is unnecessary.
  • 24. very rapidly dissolving products; Not less than 85 % of labeled amount (12 dosage form)are dissolved within 15 min in each of three buffers (pH 1.2, pH 4.5 acetate buffer, pH 6.8 phosphate buffer) using the paddle apparatus at 75 rpm or the basket apparatus at 100 rpm.
  • 25.  Generally, the risks of an inappropriate biowaiver decision should be more critically reviewed (e.g. site-specifi c absorption, induction/competition at the absorption site, excipient composition and therapeutic risks) for products containing BCS Class III APIs than for BCS Class I drugs.
  • 26.  These are eligible for a biowaiver provided that the multisource product:  is rapidly dissolving, i.e. 85% or more dissolution of the labelled amount of the API should be achieved within 30 minutes in standard media at pH 6.8 using the paddle apparatus at 75 rpm or the basket apparatus at 100 rpm; and • the multisource product exhibits similar dissolution profi les, as determined with the f2 value or equivalent statistical evaluation, to those of the comparator product in buffers at all three pH values (pH 1.2, 4.5 and 6.8).
  • 27.  For multisource products containing BCS Class II APIs with dose:solubility ratios of 250 ml or less, at pH 6.8, the excipients should also be critically evaluated in terms of type and amounts of surfactants in the formulation.
  • 28. 1. Annex 8 Proposal to waive in vivo bioequivalence requirements for WHO Model List of Essential Medicines immediate-release, solid oral dosage forms(2006) 2. WHO Workshop on Prequalification of Medicines Programme, Abu Dhabi, 11-13 October, 2010.