SlideShare a Scribd company logo
3
Most read
4
Most read
11
Most read
Biopharmaceutics
Classification System
(Class I Drugs)
Name: Aloysia Cardoso
Class: Fy Masters Of Pharmacy
Specialisaton: Pharmaceutics
Semester: One
INDEX
 DEFINATION OF BCS
 BIOPHARMACEUTICAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
 CLASS I DRUGS
 PHYSIOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS
 ADVANTAGES
 DISADVANTAGES
 LIST OF DRUGS
 FORMULATION CONSIDERATION
 REFERENCES
What is BCS?
 The Biopharmaceutics Classification System or BCS(abbreviation) is a system
which classifies bioactive molecules based on solubility and permeability which is
widely used to guide new drug development and drug formulation, as well as
predict pharmacokinetics under prescribed conditions.
 Established by Gordon Amidon et al
 The original purpose of the system was to aid in the regulation of post-approval
changes and generics, providing approvals based solely on in vitro data when
appropriate.
 Importantly, since the majority of drugs are orally dosed, the system was
designed around oral drug delivery via passive diffusion process through the
small intestine where major extent of oral absorption is largely influenced by
drug’s membrane permeability and solubility.
 Currently it is used to predict the bioavailability of the drug. Used in in-vivo & in
vitro correlations and bioavailability studies.
BIOPHARMACEUTICAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Biopharmaceutics Classification System
CLASS SOLUBIIITY PERMEABILITY ABSORPTION
PATTERN
RATE
LIMITING
STEP IN
ABSORPTION
EXAMPLES
1 HIGH HIGH WELL
ABSORBED
GASTRIC
EMPTYING
DILTIAZEM
2 LOW HIGH VARIABLE DISSOLUTION NIFEDIPINE
3 HIGH LOW VARIABLE PERMEABILITY INSULIN
4 LOW LOW POORLY
ABSORBED
CASE BY CASE TAXOL
According to the Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) drug
substances/APIs are classified to four classes Upon Their High/Low Solubility
And Permeability:
Class I Drugs
 THE DRUGS BELONGING TO BCS CLASS I ARE HIGHLY SOLUBLE AND HIGHLY
PERMEABLE, SO THEY CAN BE FORMULATED AS A SUITABLE CONVENTIONAL
DOSAGE FORMS.
 WELL ABSORBED ORALLY.
 THEY EXHIBIT A HIGH ABSORPTION NUMBER AND A HIGH DISSOLUTION NUMBER.
 SINCE THEY DO NOT HAVE SOLUBILITY NOR PERMEABILITY LIMITATION
THEREFORE THEY GENERALLY REPRESENT A LOW RISK GROUP OF COMPOUNDS IN
TERMS OF THE POTENTIAL FOR EXCIPIENTS TO AFFECT ABSORPTION, COMPARED
TO OTHER BCS CLASSES
 Example: Metoprolol, Paracetamol
 These Compounds Are Well Absorbed And Their Absorption Rate Is
Usually Higher Than Excretion.
 This system restricts the prediction using the physiochemical parameters
Aqueous solubility and Intestinal permeability. The solubility classification is based on a United
States Pharmacopoeia (USP) aperture . The intestinal permeability classification is based on a
comparison to the intravenous injection.
PHYSIOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS
 The rate limiting step is drug dissolution and if dissolution is very rapid then
gastric emptying rate becomes the rate determining step.
 Bioavailability and dissolution is very rapid. So bioavailability and bio
equivalency studies are unecessory for such product.
 IVIVC cannot be expected. These compounds are highly suitable for design the
SR and CR formulations
ADVANTAGES
 DRUG ABSORBED AND DISSOLVED RAPIDLY IN GASTRIC & INTESTINAL FLUID.
 READILY CROSS INTESTINAL WALL THROUGH PASSIVE DIFFUSION.
 RAPID THERAPEUTIC ACTION
 BIOAVAILIBILITY PROBLEM NOT EXPECTED FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DRUG
PRODUCT
 IVIVC EXPECTED, IF DISSOLUTION RATE IS SLOWER THAN GASTRIC EMPTYING
RATE, OTHERWISE LIMITED OR NO CORRELATIONS.
 UNLIKELY TO SHOW BIO-EQUIVALENCE ISSUES.HENCE INVITRO STUDIES ARE
SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION TO ENSURE INVIVO PRODUCT
PERFORMANCE
DISADVANTAGE
 Although class I compounds are expected to have excellent oral absorption,
given their high solubility and high permeability, additional absorption barriers
may exist beyond the scope of the BCS
 For example, luminal complexation and degradation can significantly limit the
amount of drug available for absorption. Even after the drug crosses the
intestinal membrane, it may be metabolized within the
enterocytes/hepatocytes and/or pumped out of the cells due to efflux
mechanisms.
 High excretion rates, absorption window and toxicity due to burst release
which may create a need to develop release modulated drug delivery systems
NAMES OF DRUGS UNDER CLASS 1
Abacavir ,Acetaminophen, Acyclovirb ,Amilorides,i Amitryptyline
S,I Antipyrine Atropine Buspironec Caffeine Captopril
Chloroquines,i Chlorpheniramine Cyclophosphamide Desipramine
Diazepam Diltiazem S,I Diphenhydramine Disopyramide Doxepin
Doxycycline Enalapril Ephedrine Ergonovine Ethambutol Ethinyl
Estradiol Fluoxetinei Glucose Imipraminei Ketorolac Ketoprofen
Labetolol Levodopas Levofloxacin S Lidocainei Lomefloxacin
Meperidine Metoprolol Metronidazole Midazolams,i Minocycline
Misoprostol Nifedipine S Phenobarbital Phenylalanine
Prednisolone Primaquines Promazine Propranolol I Quinidines,i
Rosiglitazone Salicylic Acid Theophylline Valproic Acid Verapamil
I Zidovudine
FORMULATION CONSIDERATION
SOLUBILITY
 Solubility is defined as the maximum amount of solute dissolved in a given
solvent under standard conditions of temperature, pressure and pH
 Ability of the drug to be solution after dissolution.
 HIGHLY SOLUBLE-A drug substance is considered “highly soluble” when the
highest clinical dose strength is soluble in 250 mL or less of aqueous media
over a pH range of 1–7.5 at 37°C.
 At least three pHs within this range, including buffers at pH 1.2, 4.5 and 6.8,
should be evaluated.
 Solubility is maintained over relevant timeframes to accommodate the
expected duration of absorption.
 Solubility should be evaluated by a method appropriate to the properties of the
drug substance.
 EQUILIBRIUM SOLUBILITY experiments may be performed, using a shake-flask
technique or an alternative method, if justified. Small volumes of solubility
media may be employed if the available experimental apparatus will permit
it.
 The pH for each test solution should be measured after the addition of the
drug substance and at the end of the equilibrium solubility study to ensure
the solubility measurement is conducted under the specified pH. The pH
should be adjusted if necessary. The experiment should be conducted over a
suitable timeframe to reach equilibrium.
 Solubility experiments where the highest therapeutic single dose is examined
in a 250 ml volume, or a proportionally smaller amount examined in a
proportionally smaller volume of buffer, can be considered.
 In addition, adequate STABILITY of the drug substance in the solubility media
should be demonstrated. In cases where the drug substance is not stable with
>10% degradation over the extent of the solubility assessment, solubility
cannot be adequately determined and thus the drug substance cannot be
classified
STABILITY
 Drug Substance Stability in the Gastrointestinal Tract Additional data to
document the drug’s stability in the gastrointestinal tract should be provided
if mass balance studies are used to demonstrate high permeability, unless
≥85% of the dose is recovered as unchanged drug in urine.
 Demonstration of stability in the gastrointestinal tract is required if in vitro
Caco-2 studies are used to support high permeability.
 Stability in the gastrointestinal tract may be documented using compendial
or simulated gastric and intestinal fluids.
 Drug solutions should be incubated at 37ºC for a period that is representative
of the in vivo contact of the drug substance with these fluids, i.e., one hour
in gastric fluid and three hours in intestinal fluid.
 Drug concentrations should then be determined using a suitably validated
method. Significant degradation (>10%) of a drug precludes BCS high
permeability classification.
PERMEABILITY
HIGHLY PERMEABLE
 The assessment of permeability should preferentially be based on the extent of
absorption derived from human pharmacokinetic studies, e.g., absolute
bioavailability or mass balance
 High permeability can be concluded when the absolute bioavailability is ≥90%.
 High permeability can also be concluded if ≥85% of the administered dose is
recovered in urine as unchanged (parent drug), or as the sum of parent drug, Phase
1 oxidative and Phase 2 conjugative metabolites
 Regarding metabolites in feaces, only oxidative and conjugative metabolites can be
considered.
 Metabolites produced through reduction or hydrolysis should not be included, unless
it can be demonstrated that they are not produced prior to absorption, e.g., by
microbial action within the gastrointestinal tract.
 Permeability can be also assessed by validated and standardized in vitro methods
using Caco-2 cells.
 If high permeability is not demonstrated, the drug substance is considered to have
low permeability for BCS classification purposes.
 When a single method fails to conclusively demonstrate a permeability
classification, two different methods may be advisable.
 1. Pharmacokinetic Studies in Humans
 a. Mass Balance Studies
 b. Absolute Bioavailability Studies
 2. Intestinal Permeability Methods
 The following methods can be used to determine the permeability of a drug
substance from the gastrointestinal tract:
 · In vivo intestinal perfusions studies in humans.
 · In vivo or in situ intestinal perfusion studies in animals.
 · In vitro permeation experiments with excised human or animal intestinal
tissue.
 · In vitro permeation experiments across epithelial cell monolayer
Excipient effect
 Consideration of excipient effects for BCS Class I drug products should focus on
potential changes in the rate or extent of absorption. For example, if it is
known that the drug has high permeability due to active uptake, excipients
that can inhibit uptake transporters are likely to be of concern.
 For BCS Class I drugs that exhibit slow absorption, the potential for a given
excipient to increase absorption rate should also be considered.
 Where excipient differences exist, they should be assessed for their potential
to affect in vivo absorption.
 Excipient differences should not affect the absorption profile of the drug
substance under consideration, i.e., rate and extent of absorption, using a
mechanistic and risk-based approach
 For BCS Class I drugs, qualitative and quantitative differences in excipients are
permitted, except for excipients that may affect absorption, which should be
qualitatively the same and quantitatively similar, i.e., within ± 10% of the
amount of excipient in the reference product.
 The possible effects of excipients on aspects of in vivo absorption such as
solubility gastrointestinal motility, transit time and intestinal permeability
including transporter mechanism.
 Excipients that may affect absorption include sugar-alcohols, e.g., mannitol,
sorbitol, and surfactants, e.g., sodium lauryl sulfate.nisms, should be
considered.
 The risk that a given excipient will affect the absorption of a drug substance
should be assessed mechanistically by considering:
• the amount of excipient used
• the mechanism by which the excipient may affect absorption
• absorption properties (rate, extent and mechanism of absorption) of the
drug substance
DISSOLUTION
 An drug product is considered rapidly dissolving when a mean of 85
percent or more of the labelled amount of the drug substance dissolves
within 30 minutes, using United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Apparatus 1
at 100 rpm or Apparatus 2 at 50 rpm (or at 75 rpm when appropriately
justified in a volume of 500 mL or less (or 900 mL when appropriately
justified) in each of the following media:
 (1) 0.1 N HCl or Simulated Gastric Fluid USP;
 (2) a pH 4.5 buffer; and
 (3) a pH 6.8 buffer or Simulated Intestinal Fluid USP without enzymes
 An IR(immediate release) product is considered very rapidly dissolving
when a mean of 85 percent or more of the labelled amount of the drug
substance dissolves within 15 minutes, using the above mentioned
conditions.
Media For Class I Substances
 Substances that belong to class I possess good aqueous solubility and are
transported through the GI mucosa.
 Their bioavailability after oral administration is usually close to 100 %,
provided they are not decomposed in GIT and do not under go extensive first
pass metabolism .
 After administration, the dosage form quickly passes into stomach and,
usually disintegrates there, so it is logical to use a dissolution medium that
reflects the gastric conditions.
 Simulated gastrointestinal fluid (SGF) without enzymes is suitable for many
immediate release dosage forms of this class.
 In case of weak acidic drugs simulated intestinal fluid with out enzyme may
be used
 For some capsules, an enzyme (pepsin) may have to be added to the
medium to ensure the timely dissolution of the shell
 Water is less suitable medium than the aforementioned buffers, because it
has a nominal buffer capacity zero; therefore, the pH may vary during the
test
Method Of Enhancing The Dissolution
 Use of surfactants
 Complexation
 By making the prodrug
 Use of selected polymeric forms
 Use of solvates and hydrates
 Use of salt of weak acids and weak bases
 Buffering the pH of the microenvironment
Method of enhancing the dissolution by increasing the surface area
 Micronization (reduced the particle size to increase the surface)
 Solvent deposition (deposition of poorly soluble drugs on inert material)
 Solid dispersions (dispersion of poorly soluble drugs in a solid matrix of the water
soluble carrier)
 Use of the surfactants(to increasing the surface area by facilitating proper wetting)
REFERENCES
 Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics –A treatise by D M Brahmankar &
Sunil B Jaiswal
 Biopharmaceutical Classification System :An Account Mohd Yasir*1 , , Mohd
Asif, Ashwani Kumar, Abhinav Aggarval
 ICH M9 guideline on biopharmaceutics classification system-based biowaivers
 Waiver of In Vivo Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Immediate-
Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Based on a Biopharmaceutics Classification
System Guidance for IndustryU.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
 www.fda.gov
 www.Wikipedia.com
Biopharmaceutics classification system class 1

More Related Content

PPTX
Controlled drug delivery system part II
PPTX
Theories of drug dissolution
PPTX
Phytosome
PPTX
Dissolution profile comparison
PPTX
Application Of Polymer In Controlled Release Formulation
PPT
Dissolution
PPTX
Bcs classification by sneha gaurkar
PPTX
Phytosomes
Controlled drug delivery system part II
Theories of drug dissolution
Phytosome
Dissolution profile comparison
Application Of Polymer In Controlled Release Formulation
Dissolution
Bcs classification by sneha gaurkar
Phytosomes

What's hot (20)

PPT
Bcs classification system
PPTX
PPTX
Polymers in pharmaceuticals
PPTX
Large & Small Volume Parenteral
PPTX
Transdermal drug delivery system
PPTX
Bio pharmaceutical classification System [BCS]
PDF
2. Hospital Formulary.pdf unit 2 sem 7 b.pharmacy
PDF
Mucoadhesive Drug delivery system
PPT
Nasal & Pulmonary Drug Delivery System
DOCX
Evaluation of dosage forms
PPTX
Methods of enhancing Dissolution and bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs
PPTX
PPTX
Drug excipient interaction
PPTX
Approaches Of Gastro-Retentive Drug Delivery System or GRDDS
PPTX
ION EXCHANGE RESIN DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM
PPTX
Pharmaceutical polymers
PPTX
Soft gelatin capsule
PPTX
permeation enhancers by Hemant Chalaune ist M pharm
PPTX
Niosomes (TARGETTEDDRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM)
PDF
ONE COMPARTMENT OPEN MODEL (I.V INFUSION) (Contact me: dr.m.bharathkumar@gmai...
Bcs classification system
Polymers in pharmaceuticals
Large & Small Volume Parenteral
Transdermal drug delivery system
Bio pharmaceutical classification System [BCS]
2. Hospital Formulary.pdf unit 2 sem 7 b.pharmacy
Mucoadhesive Drug delivery system
Nasal & Pulmonary Drug Delivery System
Evaluation of dosage forms
Methods of enhancing Dissolution and bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs
Drug excipient interaction
Approaches Of Gastro-Retentive Drug Delivery System or GRDDS
ION EXCHANGE RESIN DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM
Pharmaceutical polymers
Soft gelatin capsule
permeation enhancers by Hemant Chalaune ist M pharm
Niosomes (TARGETTEDDRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM)
ONE COMPARTMENT OPEN MODEL (I.V INFUSION) (Contact me: dr.m.bharathkumar@gmai...
Ad

Similar to Biopharmaceutics classification system class 1 (20)

PPTX
Biopharmaceutical Classification System
PPTX
Biopharmaceutical classification system.
PPTX
BCS classification (SHETTY CHETHAN).pptx
PPT
BCS classification system : Applications in pharmaceutics
PPT
Bcs classification system
PPT
2.Sagar Goda Biological classification system (BCS); its significance on diss...
PPT
Bcs classification system
PPTX
Dissolution and In Vitro In Vivo Correlation (IVIVC)
PPTX
biopharmaceutics classification system.pptx
PPTX
Bio Pharmaceutical Classification BCS.pptx
PPTX
Biopharmaceutical classification system
PPT
Biopharmaceutics classification system
PPTX
Industrial Pharmacy , unit-I BCS Classification
PPTX
Biopharmaceutics Presentation Topic- BCS Classification
PPTX
Biopharmaceutics classification system
PPTX
BIOPHARMACEUTICAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (BCS)
PPTX
Bcs classification system
PPT
Jatin ivivc
PDF
biopharmaceuticalclassificationystembcs-160328061345.pdf
PPTX
Biopharmaceutics Classification System
Biopharmaceutical Classification System
Biopharmaceutical classification system.
BCS classification (SHETTY CHETHAN).pptx
BCS classification system : Applications in pharmaceutics
Bcs classification system
2.Sagar Goda Biological classification system (BCS); its significance on diss...
Bcs classification system
Dissolution and In Vitro In Vivo Correlation (IVIVC)
biopharmaceutics classification system.pptx
Bio Pharmaceutical Classification BCS.pptx
Biopharmaceutical classification system
Biopharmaceutics classification system
Industrial Pharmacy , unit-I BCS Classification
Biopharmaceutics Presentation Topic- BCS Classification
Biopharmaceutics classification system
BIOPHARMACEUTICAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (BCS)
Bcs classification system
Jatin ivivc
biopharmaceuticalclassificationystembcs-160328061345.pdf
Biopharmaceutics Classification System
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
VCE English Exam - Section C Student Revision Booklet
PPTX
BOWEL ELIMINATION FACTORS AFFECTING AND TYPES
PDF
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
PDF
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
PDF
Sports Quiz easy sports quiz sports quiz
PPTX
school management -TNTEU- B.Ed., Semester II Unit 1.pptx
PDF
Physiotherapy_for_Respiratory_and_Cardiac_Problems WEBBER.pdf
PDF
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
PDF
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
PDF
Saundersa Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination.pdf
PDF
102 student loan defaulters named and shamed – Is someone you know on the list?
PPTX
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
PDF
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
PPTX
Pharmacology of Heart Failure /Pharmacotherapy of CHF
PDF
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program
PPTX
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
PDF
FourierSeries-QuestionsWithAnswers(Part-A).pdf
PDF
grade 11-chemistry_fetena_net_5883.pdf teacher guide for all student
PPTX
Lesson notes of climatology university.
PDF
TR - Agricultural Crops Production NC III.pdf
VCE English Exam - Section C Student Revision Booklet
BOWEL ELIMINATION FACTORS AFFECTING AND TYPES
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
Sports Quiz easy sports quiz sports quiz
school management -TNTEU- B.Ed., Semester II Unit 1.pptx
Physiotherapy_for_Respiratory_and_Cardiac_Problems WEBBER.pdf
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
Saundersa Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination.pdf
102 student loan defaulters named and shamed – Is someone you know on the list?
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
Pharmacology of Heart Failure /Pharmacotherapy of CHF
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
FourierSeries-QuestionsWithAnswers(Part-A).pdf
grade 11-chemistry_fetena_net_5883.pdf teacher guide for all student
Lesson notes of climatology university.
TR - Agricultural Crops Production NC III.pdf

Biopharmaceutics classification system class 1

  • 1. Biopharmaceutics Classification System (Class I Drugs) Name: Aloysia Cardoso Class: Fy Masters Of Pharmacy Specialisaton: Pharmaceutics Semester: One
  • 2. INDEX  DEFINATION OF BCS  BIOPHARMACEUTICAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM  CLASS I DRUGS  PHYSIOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS  ADVANTAGES  DISADVANTAGES  LIST OF DRUGS  FORMULATION CONSIDERATION  REFERENCES
  • 3. What is BCS?  The Biopharmaceutics Classification System or BCS(abbreviation) is a system which classifies bioactive molecules based on solubility and permeability which is widely used to guide new drug development and drug formulation, as well as predict pharmacokinetics under prescribed conditions.  Established by Gordon Amidon et al  The original purpose of the system was to aid in the regulation of post-approval changes and generics, providing approvals based solely on in vitro data when appropriate.  Importantly, since the majority of drugs are orally dosed, the system was designed around oral drug delivery via passive diffusion process through the small intestine where major extent of oral absorption is largely influenced by drug’s membrane permeability and solubility.  Currently it is used to predict the bioavailability of the drug. Used in in-vivo & in vitro correlations and bioavailability studies.
  • 5. Biopharmaceutics Classification System CLASS SOLUBIIITY PERMEABILITY ABSORPTION PATTERN RATE LIMITING STEP IN ABSORPTION EXAMPLES 1 HIGH HIGH WELL ABSORBED GASTRIC EMPTYING DILTIAZEM 2 LOW HIGH VARIABLE DISSOLUTION NIFEDIPINE 3 HIGH LOW VARIABLE PERMEABILITY INSULIN 4 LOW LOW POORLY ABSORBED CASE BY CASE TAXOL According to the Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) drug substances/APIs are classified to four classes Upon Their High/Low Solubility And Permeability:
  • 6. Class I Drugs  THE DRUGS BELONGING TO BCS CLASS I ARE HIGHLY SOLUBLE AND HIGHLY PERMEABLE, SO THEY CAN BE FORMULATED AS A SUITABLE CONVENTIONAL DOSAGE FORMS.  WELL ABSORBED ORALLY.  THEY EXHIBIT A HIGH ABSORPTION NUMBER AND A HIGH DISSOLUTION NUMBER.  SINCE THEY DO NOT HAVE SOLUBILITY NOR PERMEABILITY LIMITATION THEREFORE THEY GENERALLY REPRESENT A LOW RISK GROUP OF COMPOUNDS IN TERMS OF THE POTENTIAL FOR EXCIPIENTS TO AFFECT ABSORPTION, COMPARED TO OTHER BCS CLASSES  Example: Metoprolol, Paracetamol  These Compounds Are Well Absorbed And Their Absorption Rate Is Usually Higher Than Excretion.
  • 7.  This system restricts the prediction using the physiochemical parameters Aqueous solubility and Intestinal permeability. The solubility classification is based on a United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) aperture . The intestinal permeability classification is based on a comparison to the intravenous injection. PHYSIOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS
  • 8.  The rate limiting step is drug dissolution and if dissolution is very rapid then gastric emptying rate becomes the rate determining step.  Bioavailability and dissolution is very rapid. So bioavailability and bio equivalency studies are unecessory for such product.  IVIVC cannot be expected. These compounds are highly suitable for design the SR and CR formulations
  • 9. ADVANTAGES  DRUG ABSORBED AND DISSOLVED RAPIDLY IN GASTRIC & INTESTINAL FLUID.  READILY CROSS INTESTINAL WALL THROUGH PASSIVE DIFFUSION.  RAPID THERAPEUTIC ACTION  BIOAVAILIBILITY PROBLEM NOT EXPECTED FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DRUG PRODUCT  IVIVC EXPECTED, IF DISSOLUTION RATE IS SLOWER THAN GASTRIC EMPTYING RATE, OTHERWISE LIMITED OR NO CORRELATIONS.  UNLIKELY TO SHOW BIO-EQUIVALENCE ISSUES.HENCE INVITRO STUDIES ARE SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION TO ENSURE INVIVO PRODUCT PERFORMANCE
  • 10. DISADVANTAGE  Although class I compounds are expected to have excellent oral absorption, given their high solubility and high permeability, additional absorption barriers may exist beyond the scope of the BCS  For example, luminal complexation and degradation can significantly limit the amount of drug available for absorption. Even after the drug crosses the intestinal membrane, it may be metabolized within the enterocytes/hepatocytes and/or pumped out of the cells due to efflux mechanisms.  High excretion rates, absorption window and toxicity due to burst release which may create a need to develop release modulated drug delivery systems
  • 11. NAMES OF DRUGS UNDER CLASS 1 Abacavir ,Acetaminophen, Acyclovirb ,Amilorides,i Amitryptyline S,I Antipyrine Atropine Buspironec Caffeine Captopril Chloroquines,i Chlorpheniramine Cyclophosphamide Desipramine Diazepam Diltiazem S,I Diphenhydramine Disopyramide Doxepin Doxycycline Enalapril Ephedrine Ergonovine Ethambutol Ethinyl Estradiol Fluoxetinei Glucose Imipraminei Ketorolac Ketoprofen Labetolol Levodopas Levofloxacin S Lidocainei Lomefloxacin Meperidine Metoprolol Metronidazole Midazolams,i Minocycline Misoprostol Nifedipine S Phenobarbital Phenylalanine Prednisolone Primaquines Promazine Propranolol I Quinidines,i Rosiglitazone Salicylic Acid Theophylline Valproic Acid Verapamil I Zidovudine
  • 12. FORMULATION CONSIDERATION SOLUBILITY  Solubility is defined as the maximum amount of solute dissolved in a given solvent under standard conditions of temperature, pressure and pH  Ability of the drug to be solution after dissolution.  HIGHLY SOLUBLE-A drug substance is considered “highly soluble” when the highest clinical dose strength is soluble in 250 mL or less of aqueous media over a pH range of 1–7.5 at 37°C.  At least three pHs within this range, including buffers at pH 1.2, 4.5 and 6.8, should be evaluated.  Solubility is maintained over relevant timeframes to accommodate the expected duration of absorption.  Solubility should be evaluated by a method appropriate to the properties of the drug substance.
  • 13.  EQUILIBRIUM SOLUBILITY experiments may be performed, using a shake-flask technique or an alternative method, if justified. Small volumes of solubility media may be employed if the available experimental apparatus will permit it.  The pH for each test solution should be measured after the addition of the drug substance and at the end of the equilibrium solubility study to ensure the solubility measurement is conducted under the specified pH. The pH should be adjusted if necessary. The experiment should be conducted over a suitable timeframe to reach equilibrium.  Solubility experiments where the highest therapeutic single dose is examined in a 250 ml volume, or a proportionally smaller amount examined in a proportionally smaller volume of buffer, can be considered.  In addition, adequate STABILITY of the drug substance in the solubility media should be demonstrated. In cases where the drug substance is not stable with >10% degradation over the extent of the solubility assessment, solubility cannot be adequately determined and thus the drug substance cannot be classified
  • 14. STABILITY  Drug Substance Stability in the Gastrointestinal Tract Additional data to document the drug’s stability in the gastrointestinal tract should be provided if mass balance studies are used to demonstrate high permeability, unless ≥85% of the dose is recovered as unchanged drug in urine.  Demonstration of stability in the gastrointestinal tract is required if in vitro Caco-2 studies are used to support high permeability.  Stability in the gastrointestinal tract may be documented using compendial or simulated gastric and intestinal fluids.  Drug solutions should be incubated at 37ºC for a period that is representative of the in vivo contact of the drug substance with these fluids, i.e., one hour in gastric fluid and three hours in intestinal fluid.  Drug concentrations should then be determined using a suitably validated method. Significant degradation (>10%) of a drug precludes BCS high permeability classification.
  • 15. PERMEABILITY HIGHLY PERMEABLE  The assessment of permeability should preferentially be based on the extent of absorption derived from human pharmacokinetic studies, e.g., absolute bioavailability or mass balance  High permeability can be concluded when the absolute bioavailability is ≥90%.  High permeability can also be concluded if ≥85% of the administered dose is recovered in urine as unchanged (parent drug), or as the sum of parent drug, Phase 1 oxidative and Phase 2 conjugative metabolites  Regarding metabolites in feaces, only oxidative and conjugative metabolites can be considered.  Metabolites produced through reduction or hydrolysis should not be included, unless it can be demonstrated that they are not produced prior to absorption, e.g., by microbial action within the gastrointestinal tract.  Permeability can be also assessed by validated and standardized in vitro methods using Caco-2 cells.  If high permeability is not demonstrated, the drug substance is considered to have low permeability for BCS classification purposes.
  • 16.  When a single method fails to conclusively demonstrate a permeability classification, two different methods may be advisable.  1. Pharmacokinetic Studies in Humans  a. Mass Balance Studies  b. Absolute Bioavailability Studies  2. Intestinal Permeability Methods  The following methods can be used to determine the permeability of a drug substance from the gastrointestinal tract:  · In vivo intestinal perfusions studies in humans.  · In vivo or in situ intestinal perfusion studies in animals.  · In vitro permeation experiments with excised human or animal intestinal tissue.  · In vitro permeation experiments across epithelial cell monolayer
  • 17. Excipient effect  Consideration of excipient effects for BCS Class I drug products should focus on potential changes in the rate or extent of absorption. For example, if it is known that the drug has high permeability due to active uptake, excipients that can inhibit uptake transporters are likely to be of concern.  For BCS Class I drugs that exhibit slow absorption, the potential for a given excipient to increase absorption rate should also be considered.  Where excipient differences exist, they should be assessed for their potential to affect in vivo absorption.  Excipient differences should not affect the absorption profile of the drug substance under consideration, i.e., rate and extent of absorption, using a mechanistic and risk-based approach  For BCS Class I drugs, qualitative and quantitative differences in excipients are permitted, except for excipients that may affect absorption, which should be qualitatively the same and quantitatively similar, i.e., within ± 10% of the amount of excipient in the reference product.
  • 18.  The possible effects of excipients on aspects of in vivo absorption such as solubility gastrointestinal motility, transit time and intestinal permeability including transporter mechanism.  Excipients that may affect absorption include sugar-alcohols, e.g., mannitol, sorbitol, and surfactants, e.g., sodium lauryl sulfate.nisms, should be considered.  The risk that a given excipient will affect the absorption of a drug substance should be assessed mechanistically by considering: • the amount of excipient used • the mechanism by which the excipient may affect absorption • absorption properties (rate, extent and mechanism of absorption) of the drug substance
  • 19. DISSOLUTION  An drug product is considered rapidly dissolving when a mean of 85 percent or more of the labelled amount of the drug substance dissolves within 30 minutes, using United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Apparatus 1 at 100 rpm or Apparatus 2 at 50 rpm (or at 75 rpm when appropriately justified in a volume of 500 mL or less (or 900 mL when appropriately justified) in each of the following media:  (1) 0.1 N HCl or Simulated Gastric Fluid USP;  (2) a pH 4.5 buffer; and  (3) a pH 6.8 buffer or Simulated Intestinal Fluid USP without enzymes  An IR(immediate release) product is considered very rapidly dissolving when a mean of 85 percent or more of the labelled amount of the drug substance dissolves within 15 minutes, using the above mentioned conditions.
  • 20. Media For Class I Substances  Substances that belong to class I possess good aqueous solubility and are transported through the GI mucosa.  Their bioavailability after oral administration is usually close to 100 %, provided they are not decomposed in GIT and do not under go extensive first pass metabolism .  After administration, the dosage form quickly passes into stomach and, usually disintegrates there, so it is logical to use a dissolution medium that reflects the gastric conditions.  Simulated gastrointestinal fluid (SGF) without enzymes is suitable for many immediate release dosage forms of this class.  In case of weak acidic drugs simulated intestinal fluid with out enzyme may be used  For some capsules, an enzyme (pepsin) may have to be added to the medium to ensure the timely dissolution of the shell  Water is less suitable medium than the aforementioned buffers, because it has a nominal buffer capacity zero; therefore, the pH may vary during the test
  • 21. Method Of Enhancing The Dissolution  Use of surfactants  Complexation  By making the prodrug  Use of selected polymeric forms  Use of solvates and hydrates  Use of salt of weak acids and weak bases  Buffering the pH of the microenvironment Method of enhancing the dissolution by increasing the surface area  Micronization (reduced the particle size to increase the surface)  Solvent deposition (deposition of poorly soluble drugs on inert material)  Solid dispersions (dispersion of poorly soluble drugs in a solid matrix of the water soluble carrier)  Use of the surfactants(to increasing the surface area by facilitating proper wetting)
  • 22. REFERENCES  Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics –A treatise by D M Brahmankar & Sunil B Jaiswal  Biopharmaceutical Classification System :An Account Mohd Yasir*1 , , Mohd Asif, Ashwani Kumar, Abhinav Aggarval  ICH M9 guideline on biopharmaceutics classification system-based biowaivers  Waiver of In Vivo Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Immediate- Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Based on a Biopharmaceutics Classification System Guidance for IndustryU.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)  www.fda.gov  www.Wikipedia.com