Boost networking performance for video by configuring Dell PowerEdge R750 servers with Broadcom 57508 Dual Port 100Gb NICs

Boost networking performance for video by
configuring Dell PowerEdge R750 servers with
Broadcom 57508 Dual Port 100Gb NICs
In hands-on tests, the PowerEdge R750 server with a single 100Gb NIC
provided better and more consistent performance than it did with four
25Gb NICs
Overview
As our world grows more and more interconnected, video is playing an ever-greater role in personal,
societal, and commercial spheres. In 2022, YouTube received more than 500 hours of video uploads every
minute.1
In the 2019–2020 school year, 91 percent of public school surveyed used security cameras.2
And
this year, over 90 percent of businesses have utilized video for marketing.3
From kids live-streaming their
Minecraft games to hospital safety and security systems, video is ubiquitous.
With increasing reliance on video comes greater demands for
high‑performance technology. Video editors at marketing agencies, stores
capturing video of customers, and streaming video providers all require high
bandwidth to keep business running smoothly. So, too, do all organizations
using video. For any organization selecting new data center solutions to
support video, strong bandwidth capabilities should be a top consideration.
Here at Principled Technologies (PT), we used the Frametest tool to test the
maximum available bandwidth of two solutions: a Dell™
PowerEdge™
R750
server with a Broadcom®
57508™
Dual Port 100Gb network interface card,
and the same PowerEdge R750 server with four 25Gb NICs. (See later in
this report for more about Frametest, and note that we used two dual-port
NICs to achieve our 4x 25Gb NIC configuration.) We tested with multiple
numbers of instances, or data streams, to represent both lighter and heavier
workloads. Across all the instance counts we tested, the solution with the
100Gb Broadcom 57508 NIC delivered higher frames-per-second (FPS) rates
and more consistent bandwidth performance than the four-NIC solution. This
better, more consistent bandwidth makes the PowerEdge R750 server with
100Gb Broadcom 57508 NIC an appealing choice for organizations relying on
video for their everyday operations.
Up to 31% more
FPS on average at
8 instances
Better frame rate
consistency across
instances
Boost networking performance for video by configuring Dell PowerEdge R750 servers with Broadcom 57508 Dual Port 100Gb NICs October 2023
A Principled Technologies report: Hands-on testing. Real-world results.

How we tested
Four times 25 equals 100, so four 25Gb network
cards should deliver the same performance as a
single 100Gb network card—right?
Only in theory. In reality, a multi-NIC solution must
use some overhead to work together, and the often
unpredictable nature of balancing multiple network
streams across different network interfaces means
that performance may not always be what you’d
expect. With our testing, we aimed to quantify
the improvement in bandwidth you might see by
equipping a Dell PowerEdge R750 server with
a single Broadcom 57508 Dual Port 100Gb NIC
instead of four 25Gb NICs.
To do this, we tested a single Dell PowerEdge R750
server in two configurations—one with a single
Broadcom 57508 Dual Port 100Gb network interface
card, and one with four 25Gb NICs (two Intel®
XXV710-DA2T 2-port 25Gb Ethernet Controllers).
The server also contained:
• Two 28-core Intel Xeon®
Gold
6330 processors
• 24 3.2TB PCIe Gen 4 NVMe™
SSDs
• 256 GB of DDR4 memory
• A Broadcom®
PEX880xx PCIe Gen 4 switch
For more details about our configuration, see the
science behind the report.
To set up our solution for testing, we first installed and configured Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8.6 as
our operating system and then configured the networking. For the configuration with the Broadcom 100Gb
NIC, we used just the first port; for the other configuration, we combined the four Intel 25Gb NIC ports
into an Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP) network bond in Linux with layer 3+4 load balancing. We
configured an additional PowerEdge R750 server with a single 100Gb Broadcom dual-port NIC to operate
as a load generating client. We connected everything to a single Dell Networking S5048F-ON switch using
direct-attached cables, configuring the four 25Gb ports used by the system under test as an active (LACP)
port-channel on the switch.
We then ran multiple instances of the Frametest utility. Frametest is a tool that simulates reads and writes
of raw still frames or frames such as video post-processing or 3D rendering software might generate. It
measures throughput in terms of frame rates, or the number of video frames a solution can successfully
transfer per second, both reads and writes. Frame rates are a measure of video quality—the more frames
per second that a solution can handle, the clearer the information displayed on screen.
Video for safety and security
The safety and security market is large and
growing, starting at your front door with smart
doorbells and moving up to video surveillance
at airports, sports arenas, and shopping malls.
Revenue for smart home security in the U.S. tops
$4 billion, while the size of the global surveillance
market was over $130 billion last year.4,5
The
backbone of many of those safety and security
solutions? Video.
For these video solutions, the stakes are high.
When you have multiple security cameras
transmitting data constantly to your servers,
each data stream needs to arrive quickly, without
dropped frames or bandwidth constraints. If data
streams place too much load on the network and
make data transfer inconsistent for even a single
streaming source, such as a camera, you may
lose moments vital to safety. High quality video
streams that provide undisturbed monitoring can
better keep your assets secure.
Boost networking performance for video by configuring Dell PowerEdge R750 servers with Broadcom 57508 Dual Port 100Gb NICs October 2023 | 2

In this study, we report the average number of FPS
for each number of instances we tested as well as
the way the FPS rates varied across the multiple test
runs we did. Frametest allows the testing engineer
to customize a variety of elements. We chose a 4K
frame size, a target FPS count of 24, and a run count
of 15, meaning that each time we ran the test, it
would run 15 times in a row.
We started by running a single instance of
Frametest. We repeated this test 11 more times,
adding an instance of the benchmark each time,
ultimately running one through 12 instances
simultaneously using containers. Running more than
one instance of the utility simultaneously simulates
increasingly heavy video-processing workloads. In
a real-world context, this might mean a large team
of videographers editing video at the same time
or multiple cameras in a shopping mall streaming
video to a security office.
While many factors, including internet speed,
protocols, and encoder setup, can impact
throughput and bandwidth consistency in real-world
streaming scenarios, our tests controlled for those
variables. To see the scripts we used in testing, read
the science behind the report.
Achieve higher and more consistent bandwidth for streaming video
workloads with a Broadcom 57508 NIC
Here, we report the average throughput in FPS that our two solutions achieved running one through 12
instances of the Frametest utility. In addition to the average read and write FPS of both solutions, we
also show a theoretical target of 24 FPS per instance of Frametest. We selected 24 FPS as the target in
Frametest because it is a high enough standard to cover multiple common use cases: It is the universal
norm for movies8
and is well above the average surveillance industry frame rate of approximately 15 FPS.9
It is common for a solution to miss that theoretical target, especially under heavier workloads, but the
closer it gets, the better the performance.
Figures 1 and 2 show the average frames per second for reads and writes that both solutions achieved.
While both the Broadcom 57508 solution and the four-NIC solution handled lighter loads with similar
throughput, the four-NIC solution dropped well below target as the video load increased. The Broadcom
57508 solution continued to keep pace with the target frame rate until reaching the heaviest workloads of
11 and 12 instances; in contrast, the four-NIC solution started to drop off as early as five instances.
Video in retail
While consumers might typically think of video
for retail in terms of online advertising, video
is also increasingly a part of in-store shopping
experiences. Grocery stores use video screens
to advertise sales, and in-store cameras can map
where customers are lingering over products or
when a line is getting too long.6, 7
Some of this
video returns to company data centers for artificial
intelligence (AI) analysis of which customers
engage with the screens, where and how
shoppers navigate a store, and the demographics
of the store’s customers.
From providing a more compelling experience
to customers in store to delivering more granular
insights on shopper behavior, all of these use
cases benefit from higher video quality and
faster file transfer.

At these heavier loads, the Broadcom 57508 solution delivered consistently higher throughput. At eight
instances, it achieved a 31 percent higher rate of frames per second than the four-NIC solution. We saw
differentials through 12 instances, where the Broadcom 57508 solution achieved a 22 percent higher rate.
In addition to looking at the average bandwidth each solution achieved, we also assessed read bandwidth
consistency across the 15 test runs of Frametest at each instance count. When bandwidth consistency is high,
no one data stream has priority over the others, allowing for fast, smooth video transfer. The more consistent
bandwidth is—or the less variance there is from the average—the better the end-user experience will be, and
the lower the likelihood of issues with the video.
As Figures 3 and 4 show, the two solutions delivered similar consistency at one and two instances.
Figure 1: Frametest results, in average read frames per second,
for the two NIC solutions from 1 to 12 instances.
Higher numbers are better. Source: Principled Technologies.
Figure 2: Frametest results, in average write frames per second,
for the two NIC solutions from 1 to 12 instances.
Higher numbers are better. Source: Principled Technologies.
Figure 3: Frametest results, in frames per second, for one instance. Higher rates and greater consistency are better. Source:
Principled Technologies.
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FPS
Number of instances
Average frames per second: Reads
Higher is better
1x 100Gb NIC (Broadcom 57508) solution
4x 25Gb NIC solution
Theoretical target
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Number of instances
Average frames per second: Writes
Higher is better
FPS
1x 100Gb NIC (Broadcom 57508) solution
4x 25Gb NIC solution
Theoretical target
1x 100Gb NIC (Broadcom 57508) solution 4x 25Gb NIC solution
Frametest performance for one instance
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
FPS
Run number Run number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

At as few as three instances, however, the four-NIC solution began to display some inconsistency, as we
see in Figure 5.
Frametest performance for two instances
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
FPS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Figure 4: Frametest results, in frames per second, for two instances. Higher rates and greater consistency are better. Source:
Figure 5: Frametest results, in frames per second, for three instances. Higher rates and greater consistency are better. Source:
Frametest performance for three instances
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
FPS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

This problem gets markedly worse as we add instances and the workload grows heavier (Figures 6 through 14).
While a solution of four 25Gb NICs theoretically should be able to achieve the same results as one with a single
100Gb NIC, it cannot. This is due to the nature of the LACP load-balancing algorithm.
The Broadcom 100Gb solution, in contrast, is much more consistent at every instance count above the first two,
with minimal variance even at the heaviest workload of 12 instances.
Frametest performance for four instances
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
FPS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Figure 6: Frametest results, in frames per second, for four instances. Higher rates and greater consistency are better. Source:
Figure 7: Frametest results, in frames per second, for five instances. Higher rates and greater consistency are better. Source:
Frametest performance for five instances
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
FPS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Frametest performance for six instances
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
FPS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Figure 8: Frametest results, in frames per second, for six instances. Higher rates and greater consistency are better. Source:
Figure 9: Frametest results, in frames per second, for seven instances. Higher rates and greater consistency are better. Source:
Frametest performance for seven instances
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
FPS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Frametest performance for eight instances
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
FPS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Figure 10: Frametest results, in frames per second, for eight instances. Higher rates and greater consistency are better. Source:
Figure 11: Frametest results, in frames per second, for nine instances. Higher rates and greater consistency are better. Source:
Frametest performance for nine instances
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
FPS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Frametest performance for 10 instances
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
FPS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Figure 12: Frametest results, in frames per second, for 10 instances. Higher rates and greater consistency are better. Source:
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
FPS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Higher bandwidth and greater consistency decrease the chance of frustrating buffering times and
can allow for faster video startup and smoother playback. These benefits could in turn improve user
experience, leading to the potential for greater user satisfaction, improved customer retention, and
increased productivity.10
Lower-performing networking, in contrast, can cause videos to drop frames
or lead to long, frustrating buffering times. A fast back-end networking solution is especially critical for
organizations that serve people or locations with more limited internet bandwidth—users with slower
connections won’t have the same experience as those with fast connections, but a more consistent video
stream can help mitigate the difference.
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
FPS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
About the Dell PowerEdge R750 server
The Dell PowerEdge R750 is a full-featured, general-purpose 2U rack server featuring 3rd
Gen Intel Xeon Scalable
processors. According to Dell, the PowerEdge R750 is purpose-built to optimize application performance and
acceleration with PCIe Gen 4.0 compatibility, eight channels of memory per CPU, and up to 24 NVMe drives.11
It also includes “I/O bandwidth and storage to address data requirements – ideal for: traditional corporate IT,
database and analytics, virtual desktop infrastructure, AI/ML, and HPC.”12
PT has tested the Dell PowerEdge
R750 from many different angles, assessing its performance on multiple workloads. In studies from the past
several years, we’ve found that the PowerEdge R750:
• Processed more storage requests and sustained more storage throughput than a previous-gen server13
• Delivered strong image-classification performance in a configuration with GPUs and vSphere with Tanzu14
• Improved analytics performance versus older servers while keeping CPU utilization below 70 percent15
• Completed Hadoop workloads faster than an older server16
• Supported thousands of web app users while meeting quality-of-service requirements in a VMware
vSphere with Tanzu environment17
To learn more about the Dell PowerEdge R750, check out the spec sheet at https://i.dell.com/sites/
csdocuments/Product_Docs/en/poweredge-R750-spec-sheet.pdf. For more PT studies on the PowerEdge
R750, as well as other servers in the PowerEdge line, visit https://www.principledtechnologies.com/portfolio-
marketing/Dell/2023.

Conclusion
Video has never been more important or more omnipresent than it is today. Organizations
putting video to work in ever more critical ways need to invest in server solutions with fast, high-
performance networking.
In our data center, we found that a Dell PowerEdge R750 server with a single Broadcom 57508 Dual
Port 100Gb NIC offered higher and more consistent bandwidth than the same server with four 25Gb
NICs. Four times 25 equals 100. However, because of the overhead a multi-NIC solution requires and
the realities of balancing multiple network streams across different network interfaces, the solution with a
Broadcom 100Gb NIC performed better on both reads and writes running lighter and heavier workloads.
If video plays an important role in your business, consider selecting Broadcom 57508 Dual Port 100Gb
NICs for your Dell PowerEdge R750 servers.
About the Broadcom 57508 Dual Port 100Gb network interface card
Compatible with a wide range of PowerEdge servers, the 57508 Dual Port 100GbE network
interface card features Broadcom BroadSAFE®
technology and multi-host support and is
compliant with PCI Express 4.0 and the SFF-8402 standard.18
According to Dell, this PCIe
adapter is “ideal for high-performance network applications.”19
To learn more, read the data sheet at www.broadcom.com.

This project was commissioned by Dell Technologies.
1. Statista, “Hours of video uploaded to YouTube every minute as of February 2022,” accessed September 12, 2023,
https://www.statista.com/statistics/259477/hours-of-video-uploaded-to-youtube-every-minute/.
2. “School safety and security measures,” accessed September 12, 2023, https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=334.
3. Wyzowl, “Video Marketing Statistics 2023,” accessed September 12, 2023,
https://www.wyzowl.com/video-marketing-statistics/.
4. Statista, “Security & surveillance technology - statistics & facts,” accessed September 12, 2023,
https://www.statista.com/topics/2646/security-and-surveillance-technology/#topicOverview.
5. Statista, “Surveillance technology market size worldwide from 2020 to 2026,” accessed September 12, 2023,
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1251839/surveillance-technology-market-global/.
6. Steve Olenski, “Can In-Store Video Help Or Hurt The Customer Experience?” accessed September 12, 2023, https://www.
forbes.com/sites/steveolenski/2016/12/09/can-in-store-video-help-or-hurt-the-customer-experience/?sh=403845665d6d.
7. James Stark, “Improving retail security with video analytics,” accessed September 12, 2023,
https://www.securitymagazine.com/articles/99212-video-analytics-offer-retailers-benefits-that-go-beyond-security.
8. Lewis McGregor, “The Surprisingly Fascinating World of Frame Rates,” accessed September 12, 2023,
https://www.premiumbeat.com/blog/advanced-look-into-frame-rates/.
9. IPVM Team, “Frame Rate Guide for Video Surveillance,” accessed September 12, 2023,
https://ipvm.com/reports/frame-rate-surveillance-guide.
10. Jonathan Johnson, “Data Streaming Explained: Pros, Cons & How It Works,” accessed September 12, 2023,
https://www.bmc.com/blogs/data-streaming/.
11. “Dell EMC PowerEdge R750 Spec Sheet,” accessed June 28, 2023,
https://i.dell.com/sites/csdocuments/Product_Docs/en/poweredge-R750-spec-sheet.pdf.
12. “Dell EMC PowerEdge R750 Spec Sheet.”
13. Principled Technologies, “Achieve more storage performance with Dell PowerEdge R750 servers equipped with
Broadcom PCIe Gen4 switches,” accessed September 12, 2023, https://www.principledtechnologies.com/dell/Power-
Edge-R750-Broadcom-NVMe-comparison-0422.pdf.
14. Principled Technologies, “Combine containerization and GPU acceleration on VMware: Dell PowerEdge R750 servers with
NVIDIA GPUs and VMware vSphere with Tanzu,” accessed September 12, 2023, https://www.principledtechnologies.com/
Dell/PowerEdge-R750-VMware-Tanzu-NVIDIA-GPU-0323.pdf.
15. Principled Technologies, “Analyze more data, faster, by upgrading to latest-generation Dell EMC PowerEdge R750 serv-
ers,” accessed September 12, 2023, https://www.principledtechnologies.com/Dell/PowerEdge-R750-analytics-compari-
son-0621.pdf.
16. Principled Technologies, “Dell PowerEdge R750 servers featuring Dell PowerEdge RAID Controllers (PERC 11) delivered
stronger Apache Hadoop big data performance while maintaining high availability,” accessed September 14, 2023,
https://www.principledtechnologies.com/Dell/PERC-11-Dell-HPE-Hadoop-0923.pdf.
17. Principled Technologies, “A single Dell EMC PowerEdge R750 using Kubernetes containers supported up to 47,150 web
application users across 11 instances,” accessed September 12, 2023, https://www.principledtechnologies.com/Dell/Pow-
erEdge-R750-vSphere-Kubernetes-web-app-1121.pdf.
18. “BCM957508-P2100G Dual-Port 100 Gb/s QSFP56 Ethernet PCI Express 4.0 x16 Network Interface Card,” accessed Sep-
tember 12, 2023, https://docs.broadcom.com/doc/957508-P2100G-DS.
19. “Broadcom®
57508 Dual Port 100GbE QSFP Adapter, PCIe Full Height,” accessed September 12, 2023,
https://www.dell.com/en-my/shop/broadcom-57508-dual-port-100gbe-qsfp-adapter-pcie-full-height/apd/540-bdec/wi-
fi-and-networking#tabs_section.
Principled Technologies is a registered trademark of Principled Technologies, Inc.
All other product names are the trademarks of their respective owners.
For additional information, review the science behind this report.
Principled
Technologies®
Facts matter.®
Principled
Technologies®
Facts matter.®
Read the science behind this report at https://facts.pt/Y6dW6vL

Boost networking performance for video by configuring Dell PowerEdge R750 servers with Broadcom 57508 Dual Port 100Gb NICs

More Related Content

Similar to Boost networking performance for video by configuring Dell PowerEdge R750 servers with Broadcom 57508 Dual Port 100Gb NICs (20)

More from Principled Technologies (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Boost networking performance for video by configuring Dell PowerEdge R750 servers with Broadcom 57508 Dual Port 100Gb NICs