Building Downwash - Problems, Solutions and Next Generation
Download as PPTX, PDF2 likes934 views
This document discusses problems with building downwash modeling in AERMOD and the need for improvements. It summarizes research showing that AERMOD significantly overpredicts concentrations for certain building types like wide and long buildings. Examples are given where AERMOD predictions were 10 times higher than actual observed levels. Short-term solutions like using equivalent building dimensions are proposed, but a next generation model is needed that fixes issues in AERMOD's building wake and turbulence calculations and incorporates current scientific understanding of building downwash. Collaboration between regulators and industry is suggested to develop an improved, verified downwash model.
Building Downwash - Problems, Solutions and Next Generation
- 1. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com Building Downwash – Problems, Solutions and Next Generation 11th Conference on Air Quality Modeling EPA Research Triangle Park, NC Campus August 12-13, 2015 Ron Petersen, PhD, CCM, FASHRAE Cell: 970 690 1344 rpetersen@cppwind.com CPP, Inc. 2400 Midpoint Drive, Suite 190 Fort Collins, CO 80525 www.cppwind.com @CPPWindExperts
- 2. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com Social Based on Needs Environmental Conservative Model Economic Non-Conservative Model Why is this Important? Its About Sustainability Bearable Equitable Viable Sustainability We need an accurate dispersion model! Sustainable
- 3. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com Overview of Problems with Building Downwash • Downwash theory based on research done before 2000 • Original theory based on a limited number of “solid” building shapes • Schulman and Petersen documented problems for long and wide buildings and tall stacks at 10th modeling conference • Theory is not suitable for porous, streamlined, wide or elongated structures • CPP’s evaluation of theory has identified deficiencies and inaccuracies • Recent and past model comparisons with observations
- 4. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com Examples Problems -Overprediction From 10th Modeling Conference Schulman, 2012, Wide/Long Building Issue • Wide Buildings: Concentration increased by factors of 3 to 14 when Width > 4 x Height • Long Buildings: Concentration increased by factors of 4 to 10 when Length > 4 x height for GEP stack. • Field Observations at ALCOA TN wide/long facility: Model overpredicts by factor of ~10. Hs/Hb = 2.5
- 5. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com An Assessment of the AERMOD by IDEM Keith Baugues, Assistant Commissioner AERMOD not working!!!! • Q:Q: Model Overpredicts by Factor of 2 or More • Paired: Very Poor Agreement Model (ppm) Model (ppm) Observed(ppm) Observed(ppm)
- 6. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com AECOM Field Study at Mirant Power Station (Shea et al., 2012) 2Shea, D., O. Kostrova, A. MacNutt, R. Paine, D. Cramer, L. Labrie, “A Model Evaluation Study of AERMOD Using Wind Tunnel and Ambient Measurements at Elevated Locations,” 100th Annual AWMA Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, June 2007. • Model overpredicted by factor of 10 on residential tower • Better agreement with EBD, but still overpredicted by factor of 4 • Best agreement with no buildings, still overpredicted by factor of 2. • In reality, plume is not affected by building downwash.
- 8. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com AERMOD Building Wake Problems – AERMOD Overestimates Downwash Hb = 20 m Problem even worse for longer buildings • Wake height overestimated: need higher plumes to avoid downwash. • Start of maximum building downwash farther downwind than in reality
- 9. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com Turbulence Calculations in Wake Flawed - Constant downwash enhancement up to wake height (Fix?) -Downwash enhancement decrease to ambient flawed (Fix?) Starting Relation Wake Velocity Deficit: ΔUo/Uo = -0.7 Where: J.C. Weil, A New Dispersion Model for Stack Sources in Building Wakes, 9th Joint Conference on Air Pollution Meteorology with A&WMA, 1996. Bad assumptions
- 10. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com Height of Building Downwash Overestimated (High Turbulence Zone >> AERMOD Overestimates) PRIME Reality Taller Stacks Needed to Clear Downwash Zone
- 11. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com More AERMOD Overestimates Downwash (turbulence) enhanced by factor of ~10 under stable conditions: not documented (Fix?). AERMOD Turbulence Enhancement Factor Starting at Lee Wall of Building No Evidence Supporting This is Provided!! ξ = R @ X = 0, the lee wall Is PRIME really enhancing turbulence like this?
- 12. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com CPP’s Limited Research Velocity Mapping for 1:1:2 Building
- 13. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com Findings from CPP’s Limited Research - Wind tunnel measurements show little enhancement above building height (Fix?) Building Distance Turbulence Increase Factor ξ/Hb AERMOD Observed 1 5.7 1.0 to 5.7 2 4.4 1.0 to 5.2 3 2.9 1.0 to 2.2 Turbulence Increase Factor
- 14. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com FDS LES Simulation for 1:1:2 Building Very little downwash enhancement above the building
- 16. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com Streamline Calculation Comparison Flawed (Bug?) Figure 6. Prime predicted and observed streamlines from Schulman1 Given: • H=W=L=R PRIME Logic • If L> 0.9R (= 0.9L) reattachment occurs, and Hr = H For this case, • L>0.9R = 0.9L, therefore • Hr = H That means all streamlines should be horizontal and they are not in example. What is PRIME really doing?
- 18. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com Refinery Structures Upwind - Horizontal flow Solid BPIP Structure Upwind No Structures Streamlines for Lattice Structures Should be horizontal (Fix?)
- 19. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com Solutions and Next Generation (Sustainability) • Short Term Fix: Use Equivalent Building Dimensions • EBDs are the dimensions (height, width, length and location) that are input into AERMOD in place of BPIP dimensions to more accurately predict building wake effects • Not a complete fix because of problems with the theory • Determined using wind tunnel modeling • Next Generation: Improved AERMOD (and SCICHEM) and BPIP • Collaboration between EPA and Industry
- 20. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com Short Term: Advanced AERMOD Modeling to ~Fix EBD Geometry for AERMOD EBD Test Model BPIP Geometry for AERMOD BPIP Actual Site BPIP Diagnostic Shows Problems
- 21. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com FACTOR of 4 to 8 reduction when EBD used Short building with a large foot print FACTOR of 2 to 4 reduction when EBD used Hyperbolic cooling towers Typical AERMOD Overprediction Factors When Using BPIP Inputs and Current Theory
- 22. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com Typical AERMOD Overprediction Factors When Using BPIP Inputs and Current Theory FACTOR of 2 to 5 reduction when EBD used Very Wide/Narrow Buildings FACTOR of 2 to 3.5 reduction when EBD used Lattice Structures
- 23. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com Why EBD helps but doesn’t solve problem AERMOD/PPRIME Overestimates Downwash EBD ~ reality Reality
- 24. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com Long Buildings with Wind at an Angle Figure created in BREEZE® Downwash Analyst BREEZE is a registered trademark of Trinity Consultants, Inc.
- 25. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com Downwash Based on EBD and BPIP Figures created in BREEZE® Downwash Analyst BREEZE is a registered trademark of Trinity Consultants, Inc.
- 26. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com Typical AERMOD Underprediction Factors • Factor of two: Corner Vortex Rhinelander Corner Vortex AERMOD ~ Factor of 2 Low at Monitor Upwind Terrain Wakes Not Treated in AERMOD • Factor of 2-6: Upwind Terrain
- 27. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com The Next Generation Downwash Model Moving Toward Sustainability • Correct all the bugs • Fix the known problems in the theory • Incorporate the current state of science • Advance the current state of the science • Expand the types of structures that can be accurately handled • Well documented and verified model formulation document and code for PRIME • Add section to Appendix W that outlines a method to update model based on current research. • Collaborate with industry to work toward an improved model
- 28. www.cppwind.comwww.cppwind.com Ron Petersen, PhD, CCM rpetersen@cppwind.com Direct: + 970 498 2366 CPP, Inc. 2400 Midpoint Drive, Suite 190 Fort Collins, CO 80525 + 970 221 3371 www.cppwind.com @CPPWindExperts Thank You!