Telecommunications Law
Telecommunications Law
Cellphone Tower Regulation:
Maximizing Revenue
While Protecting Local Interests
Joseph Van Eaton
Gerard Lederer
Best Best & Krieger LLP
Strafford Webinars - May 14, 2015
2
Telecommunications Law
Part I:
Local Regulation of Wireless Facilities
Part II:
Leasing Facilities to Wireless Providers
3
Telecommunications Law
Part I:
Local Regulation of Wireless
Facilities
4
Telecommunications Law 5
Major Federal Provisions
• 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7) (Preservation of Local Zoning Authority)
• 47 U.S.C. § 1455 (Section 6409) (Collocation/Modification of Existing
Facilities)
• Section 332(c)(7) applies to “personal wireless service (PWS) facilities,”
which includes commercial mobile services, unlicensed wireless services,
and common carrier wireless exchange access services
• Generally preserves local zoning authority, but imposes five limitations.
 Shall not “unreasonably discriminate” among providers of functionally
equivalent services (332(c)(7)(B)(i)(I))
 Prohibit or effectively prohibit provision of PWS (332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II))
 Locality must act on request within “reasonable period of time”…
5
Telecommunications Law 6
Section 332(c)(7) (cont’d)
• Generally preserves local zoning authority…
 Decision to deny must be “in writing” and supported by “substantial
evidence”
 No regulation of RF – except may require applicant to satisfy FCC rules
• Limitations do not apply to proprietary property
• Supreme Court has recently ruled on meaning of “in writing” requirement:
Denial and substantial evidence need not be in same document, but must be
essentially contemporaneous. See, T-MOBILE SOUTH, LLC v. CITY
OF ROSWELL __U.S.__, 135 S.Ct. 808 (2015).
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/13-975_8n6a.pdf
6
Telecommunications Law
Section 6409(a) (47 U.S.C. §1455)
(a) Facility modifications.
(1) In general. Notwithstanding… any other provision of law, a
State or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any
eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless
tower or base station that does not substantially change the
physical dimensions of such tower or base station.
(2) Eligible facilities request. For purposes of this subsection, the term
“eligible facilities request” means any request for modification of
an existing wireless tower or base station that involves—
(A) collocation of new transmission equipment;
(B) removal of transmission equipment; or
(C) replacement of transmission equipment.
7
Telecommunications Law
FCC Report and Order
• 155 Page Report and Order
 Adopted October 17, 2014
 Released October 21, 2014
 Published in Fed. Register on
January 8, 2015
 Appeal Underway –
Argument Expected in 4th
Cir.
by October
 Now fully effective
8
Telecommunications Law9
Telecommunications Law
FCC Rules 47 CFR § 1.40001 – Definitions
1. Substantial Change
 Towers other than Right of Way (ROW) towers,
modification:
• Increases height by more than 10% or 20 feet whichever is
greater
• Appurtenance added protrudes from body of structure more
than 20 feet or width of tower at pt. of attachment
 All other support structures, modification
• Increases height by 10 feet or 10%, whichever is greater
• Appurtenance added protrudes more than 6 feet
 Height measured from facility as it exists as of date of
passage of Act (2012)
10
Telecommunications Law
FCC Rules 47 CFR § 1.40001 – Definitions
(cont’d)
1. Substantial Change For towers and base
stations in ROW:
• New equipment cabinets if there are none, or involves
placement of cabinets 10% greater in height or overall
volume than other cabinets associated with structure
 All other eligible support structures:
• Installation of more than four equipment cabinets
 It entails any excavation or deployment outside of
site
 It would defeat “concealment elements” of the
“eligible support structure”
11
Telecommunications Law
1. Substantial Change
 It does not comply with conditions associated with
siting approval…but limitation does not apply to
any modification that is non-compliant only in a
manner that would not exceed thresholds identified
in (i)-(iv).
2. Tower: structure built for sole or primary
purpose of supporting FCC licensed or
authorized antennas and associated facilities.
FCC Rules 47 CFR § 1.40001 – Definitions
(cont’d)
12
Telecommunications Law
3. Base Station
 Equipment associated with wireless comm. service
 Antennas, coax, backup power supplies
 “any structure other than a tower” that at time of
application was supporting or housing the above.
4. Existing: A constructed tower or base station
that has been “reviewed and approved under the
applicable zoning or siting process or under
another State or local” process, except towers not
in a zoned area when built, but lawfully
constructed (non-conforming uses?).
FCC Rules 47 CFR § 1.40001 – Definitions
(cont’d)
13
Telecommunications Law
5. Eligible Support Structure is any Tower or Base
Station
Key Notes:
• Does not preempt generally applicable safety
and health codes
• Does not apply to proprietary property of
community
• Reaches all wireless facilities – including Wi-Fi
deployments
• Reaches Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) &
Small Cells
FCC Rules 47 CFR § 1.40001 – Definitions
(cont’d)
14
Telecommunications Law
Application Review
• General rule: “may not deny and shall approve” any
eligible facilities request that does not substantially
change physical dimensions
• Can require “documentation reasonably related” to
determining whether request meets requirements of
section
• Sixty days to approve UNLESS locality determines
facility is not covered
• Time frame tolled by agreement; or if notice provided of
incompleteness (30/10) with detailed citation to
requirements
• Failure to Act = application deemed granted
• Deemed grant becomes effective after applicant
notifies community that time has passed
15
Telecommunications Law
What Happens After Deemed Grant
• Once community is notified of deemed grant, it
has 30 days to file an appeal in a court of
competent jurisdiction.
• Locality can bring appeal: “when it believes the
underlying application did not meet the criteria
in Section 6409(a) for mandatory approval,
would not comply with applicable building
codes or other non-discretionary structural and
safety codes, or for other reasons is not.
• Appropriately “deemed granted.”
16
Telecommunications Law
Sec. 332(c)(7) & 6409 Together
An application that is NOT eligible under Section
6409 may still be subject to consideration under
Section 332(c)(7)
17
Telecommunications Law
Do’s
• Examine whether your laws and forms are
consistent with new order (Hint: Probably not).
 Clarify in your ordinance/government practice
manual that DAS/small cell applications are entitled
to Shot Clock.
• Consider enactment of an ordinance that
prefers government property for cell locations.
• Remember: the first cut is the deepest.
18
Telecommunications Law
Do’s
• Proprietary
 You Belong to Me Rule: Ensure everyone in your
organization understands that this order does not
grant right of free collocations on government
property.
 Ensure that you don’t grant that right in your
leases /licenses by requiring approval in writing of
municipality/Special District.
 Ensure that industry does not use new rules as an
excuse to install generators or switch out equipment
at your sites.
19
Telecommunications Law
Changes to Your Applications/Process
• Devil in Disguise Rule: More stealth?
• Require applicant provide documentation that is
“reasonably related to determining whether the
eligible facilities request meets the requirements of
Section 6409(a).”
 Meets size change – including cumulative limit
 Meets any stealth obligations
 Meets any building code/safety/non-discretionary
structural code
 Complies with any condition of approval of construction
or modification imposed on the applicable wireless tower
or base station
20
Telecommunications Law
Don'ts
• Impose a moratorium –
 Commission is specific that moratoria will not toll
6409(a) or 332(c)(7) applications.
• Approve without understanding how a facility
may expand – the smallest facility may grow an
additional 10 feet up and 6 feet out.
• Demand documentation for the business need
for the proposed modification or require a
business case for expansion.
21
Telecommunications Law
Consider an Acknowledgement Ordinance
• “Community is aware of new 6409 (a) standard as established by
Federal Communications Commission in Acceleration of
Broadband Deployment by Improving Wireless Facilities Siting
Policies, 80 Fed. Reg. 1238 (Jan. 8, 2015) (amending C.F.R. Part
1 and 17). (“Report & Order”).”
• Staff is directed to act in compliance with the timeframes and
limitations outlined in the Report and Order.
 Might empower 1 person to review; nothing requires process to be
ministerial or nondiscretionary; and
 Might allow staff to require applicants to comply with extensive notice
requirements and/or other procedural hurdles
• Should any part of the Order be struck down by a court of
competent jurisdiction, staff are directed to amend community
practices accordingly.
22
Telecommunications Law
Model Ordinance
• Engage counsel.
• See National Orgs. model.
• Please make sure not to incorporate into local
law obligations not in place in federal law – or
subject to appeal.
 30 day, 10 day and deemed granted are all subject
to OMB approval.
 Other sections that may be overturned on appeal.
23
Telecommunications Law
Part II:
Leasing Facilities to Wireless
Providers
24
Telecommunications Law
Control the Drafting Process
• Try to avoid using anyone else’s standard form
• Wireless carriers’ standard forms are
unbelievably lopsided
• Wireless carriers can and will take advantage of
you if you aren’t careful
• Developing and using a standard form saves
time and helps avoid overlooking issues
25
Telecommunications Law
Premises & Grant of Authority
• Include an exhibit with legal descriptions,
drawings and/or photos.
• The more detail you have, the easier it is to
police the agreement, especially regarding
illegal collocations and subleases.
• Use of common areas and access points.
• Control signage.
26
Telecommunications Law
License/Lease Not Easement
• Granting an easement may be granting others
access to same property.
• License is all the legal authority a wireless
carrier needs.
• Lease structure is also an acceptable alternative
(but grants exclusive use, not shared use).
27
Telecommunications Law
Term
• For general leases, define term and renewal
options.
• For wireless sites, typically series of 5 year
terms – 20 to 30 years total.
• Strategic decision re auto renewals or
affirmative notice required.
 If notice is required, keep a database of renewal
dates.
28
Telecommunications Law
Term (cont’d)
• Beware of “options to lease” tying up sites with
no guarantee of rent.
• Avoid long delivery or construction periods for
permitting with no rent. Begin term
immediately and add construction period to
overall term.
• 30-60 days or commencement of construction,
whichever comes first.
29
Telecommunications Law
Due Diligence Period
• Limited time in which wireless carrier has to
obtain legal clearances and ensure that site
works for them.
• DON’T give this time away for free.
• Be sure to get indemnity for any activities on
site by licensee/consultants and require prior
consent for any borings; require copies of any
consultant reports be provided to you.
30
Telecommunications Law
Rent/License Fee
• Basic fee
• Collocation fees (or address this later)
• Late Fees, Interest and Hold-Over fees
 Late fees are what you can get.
 Interest limited by law (be sure to include savings
clause to avoid usury claim).
 Hold-over rent should be in the range of 125% to
150% of then-current rent.
31
Telecommunications Law
Wireless Site Base Rent
• $1.8k per month to $5K + per month, paid in
advance.
• Offer a direct deposit option.
• Carriers typically offer low escalators – e.g.,
15% every 5 years
• Try for 4%.
• Consider CPI with a floor of 3.5% and ceiling
of 5%.
32
Telecommunications Law
Assignment
• Require landlord approval
 Wireless carriers usually want to be able to shift sites
to related corporate entities without landlord
approval.
 Beware of assignments to “affiliates,” tower
operating companies.
• No release of original entity
33
Telecommunications Law
Assignment or Subletting
• No sublicensing without permission.
 Have licensee waive rights under Cal. Civil Code
§§ 1995.260, 1995.270.
 §6409 / 47 U.S.C. § 1455 regarding collocations
does not affect contractual restrictions.
• Licensor may refuse to consent to any proposed
sublicense that involves the collocation of
another carrier’s facilities.
 Additional rent for sublicensees.
34
Telecommunications Law
Interference
• Ensure that you do not cause any challenges for
any existing tenants.
• Ensure that subsequent tenants/collocators do
not cause interference.
• Burden is on newcomers to cure interference
caused by their arrival (not existing users).
• Be sure licensor/landlord is not responsible for
interference or cure.
35
Telecommunications Law
Improvements
• Detailed plans with prior approval
 Do not agree to “approval not be unreasonably
withheld, delayed or conditioned”
 Control appearance of improvements
• All work by licensee shall be performed in
compliance with applicable laws and
ordinances
• Licensee is not authorized to contract for, or on
behalf of licensor, or impose any additional
expense
36
Telecommunications Law
Improvements & Utilities
• Be sure improvements will be maintained and
upgraded to comply with laws, but any new
installations must not be heavier, greater in
capacity or space than originally granted.
• Licensee pays for utilities; licensor/landlord not
responsible for any interruptions.
• Do not agree to allowing licensee to use your
electric connection with a sub-meter.
37
Telecommunications Law
Removal of Improvements
• Think about how to handle this – may depend
on facility type
• Immediate ownership (e.g., of light pole)
• Automatic conveyance of ownership to licensor
• Option for licensor to retain improvements or
require removal
• Require removal of footings and foundations
38
Telecommunications Law
Technical Standards
• Licensee agrees to comply with all applicable
governmental laws and regulations and with
such technical standards as may from time to
time be established by licensor for the
premises, including, without limitation,
technical standards relating to frequency
compatibility, radio interference protection,
antenna type and location and physical
installation.
39
Telecommunications Law
Limit Access
(Think Post-9/11)
•24-hour notice
•Escort
•Emergency conditions for access
40
Telecommunications Law
Access Rights/Security
• If installation on roof, limit access to certain specific
areas; require your roof contractor to approve; avoid
roof penetrations which may invalidate roof
warranties; limit cabling access to common shafts
• Limit size, weight and frequency of access to roof
• If installation across private or limited access land,
limit access and protect fencing, private or
municipal property or animals
• Put burden to maintain secure fencing on licensee
41
Telecommunications Law
Events of Default/Termination by
Licensor
• Non-payment
• Habitual late payments
• Violation of any term, including non-permitted
collocations
• Bankruptcy
42
Telecommunications Law
Termination by Licensee
• Carefully define when licensee can terminate.
• Wireless carriers want ability to terminate for
“technological, economic, or environmental”
reasons.
• Either prohibit volitional terminations or
require payment (e.g., rent for remainder of
term or 12-24 months of rent).
43
Telecommunications Law
Casualty/Insurance/Indemnity
• Make sure to run by your risk assessment folks.
• Typical insurance is general liability, auto
liability, employer’s liability, all-risk property,
and workers’ comp.
• Make sure insurance requirements apply to
contractors and subs.
• Don’t accept reciprocal indemnity.
44
Telecommunications Law
Taxes
• Make sure it is clear that taxes due are in
addition to rent.
• Address possessory interest tax (Revenue and
Taxation Code 107.6) liability for licensee.
45
Telecommunications Law
Notices
• All notices, requests, demands and other
communications to be in writing and delivered
to specified addresses.
• Make sure your counsel is copied.
46
Telecommunications Law
Quiet Enjoyment, Title and
Authority
• Traditional obligation of the landlord.
• Make sure you have authority – i.e. make sure
such use is permitted under your governing
documents.
47
Telecommunications Law
Hazardous Substances
• Strict language to prohibit any such uses.
• Batteries for back-up and generators can trigger
these terms.
• Check with your environmental folks for most
recent terms – pay special attention that these
substances do not prejudice your ability to use
the site in the future.
48
Telecommunications Law
Miscellaneous
• Attorney fees
• Entire agreement
• No liability for broker/agent fees
• Governing law and venue
• Severability
49
Telecommunications Law
Miscellaneous (cont’d)
• Mortgage subordination
• Limitation on liability
• RF signage and notices
• Amendments
• No relocation assistance
• TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE
50
Telecommunications Law
Selling Your Wireless Leases
• Numerous tower operators seeking to buy
landlord lease rights.
• Typically offer fraction of NPV of lease
payments.
• Will emphasize threat of nonrenewal, certainty
of being paid.
• May ask for amendments allowing unlimited
collocations.
51
Telecommunications Law52
Telecommunications Law 53
Joseph Van Eaton
Joseph.VanEaton@bbklaw.com
Best Best & Krieger
2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Suite 5300
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: (202) 785-0600
Fax: (202) 785-1234
Cell: (202) 486-0770
Website: www.bbklaw.com
Contact Information
Gerard Lavery Lederer
Gerard.Lederer@bbklaw.com
Best Best & Krieger
2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Suite 5300
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: (202) 785-0600
Fax: (202) 785-1234
Cell: (202) 664-4621
Website: www.bbklaw.com
53

More Related Content

PPTX
A Basic Communications Law Primer for Elected Officials
PPTX
Tatoa FCC Threats and Opportunities
PDF
FCC Proposes New Rules On Local Wireless Siting
PDF
Cell Tower Issues: New Rulemaking and New Issues
PPTX
Telecommunications 2016: The Challenges Facing Local Government
PPTX
Developments in Wireless
PDF
Municipal Cable Franchise Transfer Toolkit
PDF
FCC Wireless Rulemaking - 2013
A Basic Communications Law Primer for Elected Officials
Tatoa FCC Threats and Opportunities
FCC Proposes New Rules On Local Wireless Siting
Cell Tower Issues: New Rulemaking and New Issues
Telecommunications 2016: The Challenges Facing Local Government
Developments in Wireless
Municipal Cable Franchise Transfer Toolkit
FCC Wireless Rulemaking - 2013

What's hot (20)

PDF
Maximizing the Return on Your Cell Lease/Licenses
PDF
State Franchising and Renewal: What Happens Next?
PDF
Accelerating 4G LTE Buildout: Local Land Use Approval Issues
PDF
Public Safety and Wireless Deployment
PPTX
Mega-Mergers and Impacts on Local Government
PPTX
Wireless in the Rights of Way and on Public Property
PDF
Cellular Antennas on Special District Property: The Opportunity and the Risk
PDF
Update on Wireless Facilities Siting Issues
PDF
Wireless Siting: The Issue that Won't Go Away and Grows in Complexity
PDF
Local Government Revenues in a Broadband World: Rights-of-Way Compensation
PDF
What Issues are Building and How Do They Affect Local Governments
PDF
Municipal Broadband and Opportunities for Public-Private Partnerships
PDF
The Truth about Wired and Wireless: Key Legal and Regulatory Issues by Sean S...
PPTX
IP Transition and Net Neutrality: Why Local Governments Should Care
PDF
Cable Television Update 2015 – A Look at Federal Regulatory Developments
PDF
Navigating the Internet Protocol Transition
PDF
Telecommunications Policy in an IP World
PDF
TechComm Industry Update - February 26, 2013
PDF
LA Lawyer Magazine - Jan 2016 Issue - New Requirements Facilitate Wireless In...
PPT
Tim Denton
Maximizing the Return on Your Cell Lease/Licenses
State Franchising and Renewal: What Happens Next?
Accelerating 4G LTE Buildout: Local Land Use Approval Issues
Public Safety and Wireless Deployment
Mega-Mergers and Impacts on Local Government
Wireless in the Rights of Way and on Public Property
Cellular Antennas on Special District Property: The Opportunity and the Risk
Update on Wireless Facilities Siting Issues
Wireless Siting: The Issue that Won't Go Away and Grows in Complexity
Local Government Revenues in a Broadband World: Rights-of-Way Compensation
What Issues are Building and How Do They Affect Local Governments
Municipal Broadband and Opportunities for Public-Private Partnerships
The Truth about Wired and Wireless: Key Legal and Regulatory Issues by Sean S...
IP Transition and Net Neutrality: Why Local Governments Should Care
Cable Television Update 2015 – A Look at Federal Regulatory Developments
Navigating the Internet Protocol Transition
Telecommunications Policy in an IP World
TechComm Industry Update - February 26, 2013
LA Lawyer Magazine - Jan 2016 Issue - New Requirements Facilitate Wireless In...
Tim Denton
Ad

Similar to Cellphone Tower Regulation: Maximizing Revenue While Protecting Local Interests (20)

PPTX
How Do Municipalities Comply with the FCC’s New Rule on Small Cell Wireless D...
PDF
Fast DAS FCC Comments Biennial Review(12-5-2016FY)
PPTX
Australian telecoms licensing - An overview
PPT
Mr Maxwell Hogan Lovells Net Neutrality
PPTX
Understanding Australia's anti encryption law | EAGLEGATE
PDF
Protecting PEG for the Next 15 Years
PPTX
The Brave New World of Wireless Regulations for Planners (2015)
PPTX
Licensing framework for establishing Satellite Earth Station Gateway
PPT
Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World
PDF
TechComm Industry Update ~ November 2, 2012
PDF
Philippine-Electrical-Code-Chapter one a
PDF
Contact Center Compliance April 11 2012 FCC Webinar
PPTX
Whitney MCMurdie's Intern Presentation Fall 2013 Legal
PDF
TechComm Industry Update - July 20, 2012
PDF
Draft regulation on local loop unbundling
PPTX
Boston conference slides final
PDF
Boston conference slides final
PPTX
Nov. 4, 2015 Infrastructure Committee: Small Cell Sites
PDF
FCC certification
PPTX
NGA legislation in Poland
How Do Municipalities Comply with the FCC’s New Rule on Small Cell Wireless D...
Fast DAS FCC Comments Biennial Review(12-5-2016FY)
Australian telecoms licensing - An overview
Mr Maxwell Hogan Lovells Net Neutrality
Understanding Australia's anti encryption law | EAGLEGATE
Protecting PEG for the Next 15 Years
The Brave New World of Wireless Regulations for Planners (2015)
Licensing framework for establishing Satellite Earth Station Gateway
Cable Regulation in an Evolving IP World
TechComm Industry Update ~ November 2, 2012
Philippine-Electrical-Code-Chapter one a
Contact Center Compliance April 11 2012 FCC Webinar
Whitney MCMurdie's Intern Presentation Fall 2013 Legal
TechComm Industry Update - July 20, 2012
Draft regulation on local loop unbundling
Boston conference slides final
Boston conference slides final
Nov. 4, 2015 Infrastructure Committee: Small Cell Sites
FCC certification
NGA legislation in Poland
Ad

More from Best Best and Krieger LLP (12)

PPTX
Why Can't We All Just Get Along
PPTX
When the Chair is Empty… How Do We Provide FAPE When Students Aren’t In School?
PPTX
Bay Area Legislative Update 2016
PPTX
On-Body Cameras: Answering Tough Questions from Empirical and Legal Standards
PDF
The Sharing Economy: Uber and Airbnb – Can They Exist in a Regulated World? W...
PPTX
The Federal Endangered Species Act
PPTX
How Your Community Can Respond to the Comcast - Time Warner Merger
PDF
Municipal Cable Francshise Transfer Toolkit
PDF
BB&K Labor and Employment Update 2013
PDF
Public Private Partnerships: From Economic Development to Local-Serving Infr...
PDF
Distributed Antenna Systems/Cell Tower Issues and Other FCC Developments
PDF
Work Session X: Water Quality - What Is Integrated Water Quality Planning And...
Why Can't We All Just Get Along
When the Chair is Empty… How Do We Provide FAPE When Students Aren’t In School?
Bay Area Legislative Update 2016
On-Body Cameras: Answering Tough Questions from Empirical and Legal Standards
The Sharing Economy: Uber and Airbnb – Can They Exist in a Regulated World? W...
The Federal Endangered Species Act
How Your Community Can Respond to the Comcast - Time Warner Merger
Municipal Cable Francshise Transfer Toolkit
BB&K Labor and Employment Update 2013
Public Private Partnerships: From Economic Development to Local-Serving Infr...
Distributed Antenna Systems/Cell Tower Issues and Other FCC Developments
Work Session X: Water Quality - What Is Integrated Water Quality Planning And...

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Dangers In The Oil Field: Helping Injured Workers Hold Oil And Gas Companies ...
PDF
Case Digest_ G.R. No. 46076 - People vs. Rosenthal.pdf
PDF
LATEST AMENDMENT COMPANY LAW 2016 FOR MALAYSIAN LAW
PPTX
INTRODUCTION OF Philippine Politics and Governance.pptx
PPTX
Legal drafting is the most important instrument of legal communication. The s...
PDF
UNIT-2- SALE OF GOODS ACT 1930.pdf (Applicable for India)
PPTX
A-BREIF-SUMMARY-OF-THE-FIRST-VOYAGE-AROUND-THE-WORLD-BY-MAGELLAN-BY-ANTONIO-P...
PPTX
RA 11313 (Anti Bastos Law) by Romielyn Abecia.pptx
PDF
Common Estate Planning Mistakes to Avoid in Wisconsin
PDF
UNIT-4 Partnership Act_1932.pdf (Applicable for India)
PPTX
Philippine Politics and Governance - Lesson 10 - The Executive Branch
PPTX
the 19th century as rizal’s context.pptx
PDF
UNIT-9-ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION.pdf (Applicable for India)
PDF
Case Digest_ G.R. No. 45081 - Angara vs. Electoral Commission.pdf
PPTX
Introduction to Patents & Patentability criteria.pptx
PDF
2022CH12581 - Civil Rights vs Morzak, Harrison, Chrisman et al. (Cook County,...
PDF
Special Contract till 2023.pzlinwxWinlxIlwnxdf
PPTX
原版普罗旺斯艾克斯政治学院毕业证文凭IEP Aix录取通知书多少钱
PDF
UNIT-3-COMPANIES ACT-2013.pdf (Applicable for India)
PPTX
Innovations in Business Debt Collection Practices
Dangers In The Oil Field: Helping Injured Workers Hold Oil And Gas Companies ...
Case Digest_ G.R. No. 46076 - People vs. Rosenthal.pdf
LATEST AMENDMENT COMPANY LAW 2016 FOR MALAYSIAN LAW
INTRODUCTION OF Philippine Politics and Governance.pptx
Legal drafting is the most important instrument of legal communication. The s...
UNIT-2- SALE OF GOODS ACT 1930.pdf (Applicable for India)
A-BREIF-SUMMARY-OF-THE-FIRST-VOYAGE-AROUND-THE-WORLD-BY-MAGELLAN-BY-ANTONIO-P...
RA 11313 (Anti Bastos Law) by Romielyn Abecia.pptx
Common Estate Planning Mistakes to Avoid in Wisconsin
UNIT-4 Partnership Act_1932.pdf (Applicable for India)
Philippine Politics and Governance - Lesson 10 - The Executive Branch
the 19th century as rizal’s context.pptx
UNIT-9-ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION.pdf (Applicable for India)
Case Digest_ G.R. No. 45081 - Angara vs. Electoral Commission.pdf
Introduction to Patents & Patentability criteria.pptx
2022CH12581 - Civil Rights vs Morzak, Harrison, Chrisman et al. (Cook County,...
Special Contract till 2023.pzlinwxWinlxIlwnxdf
原版普罗旺斯艾克斯政治学院毕业证文凭IEP Aix录取通知书多少钱
UNIT-3-COMPANIES ACT-2013.pdf (Applicable for India)
Innovations in Business Debt Collection Practices

Cellphone Tower Regulation: Maximizing Revenue While Protecting Local Interests

  • 2. Telecommunications Law Cellphone Tower Regulation: Maximizing Revenue While Protecting Local Interests Joseph Van Eaton Gerard Lederer Best Best & Krieger LLP Strafford Webinars - May 14, 2015 2
  • 3. Telecommunications Law Part I: Local Regulation of Wireless Facilities Part II: Leasing Facilities to Wireless Providers 3
  • 4. Telecommunications Law Part I: Local Regulation of Wireless Facilities 4
  • 5. Telecommunications Law 5 Major Federal Provisions • 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7) (Preservation of Local Zoning Authority) • 47 U.S.C. § 1455 (Section 6409) (Collocation/Modification of Existing Facilities) • Section 332(c)(7) applies to “personal wireless service (PWS) facilities,” which includes commercial mobile services, unlicensed wireless services, and common carrier wireless exchange access services • Generally preserves local zoning authority, but imposes five limitations.  Shall not “unreasonably discriminate” among providers of functionally equivalent services (332(c)(7)(B)(i)(I))  Prohibit or effectively prohibit provision of PWS (332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II))  Locality must act on request within “reasonable period of time”… 5
  • 6. Telecommunications Law 6 Section 332(c)(7) (cont’d) • Generally preserves local zoning authority…  Decision to deny must be “in writing” and supported by “substantial evidence”  No regulation of RF – except may require applicant to satisfy FCC rules • Limitations do not apply to proprietary property • Supreme Court has recently ruled on meaning of “in writing” requirement: Denial and substantial evidence need not be in same document, but must be essentially contemporaneous. See, T-MOBILE SOUTH, LLC v. CITY OF ROSWELL __U.S.__, 135 S.Ct. 808 (2015). http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/13-975_8n6a.pdf 6
  • 7. Telecommunications Law Section 6409(a) (47 U.S.C. §1455) (a) Facility modifications. (1) In general. Notwithstanding… any other provision of law, a State or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station. (2) Eligible facilities request. For purposes of this subsection, the term “eligible facilities request” means any request for modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that involves— (A) collocation of new transmission equipment; (B) removal of transmission equipment; or (C) replacement of transmission equipment. 7
  • 8. Telecommunications Law FCC Report and Order • 155 Page Report and Order  Adopted October 17, 2014  Released October 21, 2014  Published in Fed. Register on January 8, 2015  Appeal Underway – Argument Expected in 4th Cir. by October  Now fully effective 8
  • 10. Telecommunications Law FCC Rules 47 CFR § 1.40001 – Definitions 1. Substantial Change  Towers other than Right of Way (ROW) towers, modification: • Increases height by more than 10% or 20 feet whichever is greater • Appurtenance added protrudes from body of structure more than 20 feet or width of tower at pt. of attachment  All other support structures, modification • Increases height by 10 feet or 10%, whichever is greater • Appurtenance added protrudes more than 6 feet  Height measured from facility as it exists as of date of passage of Act (2012) 10
  • 11. Telecommunications Law FCC Rules 47 CFR § 1.40001 – Definitions (cont’d) 1. Substantial Change For towers and base stations in ROW: • New equipment cabinets if there are none, or involves placement of cabinets 10% greater in height or overall volume than other cabinets associated with structure  All other eligible support structures: • Installation of more than four equipment cabinets  It entails any excavation or deployment outside of site  It would defeat “concealment elements” of the “eligible support structure” 11
  • 12. Telecommunications Law 1. Substantial Change  It does not comply with conditions associated with siting approval…but limitation does not apply to any modification that is non-compliant only in a manner that would not exceed thresholds identified in (i)-(iv). 2. Tower: structure built for sole or primary purpose of supporting FCC licensed or authorized antennas and associated facilities. FCC Rules 47 CFR § 1.40001 – Definitions (cont’d) 12
  • 13. Telecommunications Law 3. Base Station  Equipment associated with wireless comm. service  Antennas, coax, backup power supplies  “any structure other than a tower” that at time of application was supporting or housing the above. 4. Existing: A constructed tower or base station that has been “reviewed and approved under the applicable zoning or siting process or under another State or local” process, except towers not in a zoned area when built, but lawfully constructed (non-conforming uses?). FCC Rules 47 CFR § 1.40001 – Definitions (cont’d) 13
  • 14. Telecommunications Law 5. Eligible Support Structure is any Tower or Base Station Key Notes: • Does not preempt generally applicable safety and health codes • Does not apply to proprietary property of community • Reaches all wireless facilities – including Wi-Fi deployments • Reaches Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) & Small Cells FCC Rules 47 CFR § 1.40001 – Definitions (cont’d) 14
  • 15. Telecommunications Law Application Review • General rule: “may not deny and shall approve” any eligible facilities request that does not substantially change physical dimensions • Can require “documentation reasonably related” to determining whether request meets requirements of section • Sixty days to approve UNLESS locality determines facility is not covered • Time frame tolled by agreement; or if notice provided of incompleteness (30/10) with detailed citation to requirements • Failure to Act = application deemed granted • Deemed grant becomes effective after applicant notifies community that time has passed 15
  • 16. Telecommunications Law What Happens After Deemed Grant • Once community is notified of deemed grant, it has 30 days to file an appeal in a court of competent jurisdiction. • Locality can bring appeal: “when it believes the underlying application did not meet the criteria in Section 6409(a) for mandatory approval, would not comply with applicable building codes or other non-discretionary structural and safety codes, or for other reasons is not. • Appropriately “deemed granted.” 16
  • 17. Telecommunications Law Sec. 332(c)(7) & 6409 Together An application that is NOT eligible under Section 6409 may still be subject to consideration under Section 332(c)(7) 17
  • 18. Telecommunications Law Do’s • Examine whether your laws and forms are consistent with new order (Hint: Probably not).  Clarify in your ordinance/government practice manual that DAS/small cell applications are entitled to Shot Clock. • Consider enactment of an ordinance that prefers government property for cell locations. • Remember: the first cut is the deepest. 18
  • 19. Telecommunications Law Do’s • Proprietary  You Belong to Me Rule: Ensure everyone in your organization understands that this order does not grant right of free collocations on government property.  Ensure that you don’t grant that right in your leases /licenses by requiring approval in writing of municipality/Special District.  Ensure that industry does not use new rules as an excuse to install generators or switch out equipment at your sites. 19
  • 20. Telecommunications Law Changes to Your Applications/Process • Devil in Disguise Rule: More stealth? • Require applicant provide documentation that is “reasonably related to determining whether the eligible facilities request meets the requirements of Section 6409(a).”  Meets size change – including cumulative limit  Meets any stealth obligations  Meets any building code/safety/non-discretionary structural code  Complies with any condition of approval of construction or modification imposed on the applicable wireless tower or base station 20
  • 21. Telecommunications Law Don'ts • Impose a moratorium –  Commission is specific that moratoria will not toll 6409(a) or 332(c)(7) applications. • Approve without understanding how a facility may expand – the smallest facility may grow an additional 10 feet up and 6 feet out. • Demand documentation for the business need for the proposed modification or require a business case for expansion. 21
  • 22. Telecommunications Law Consider an Acknowledgement Ordinance • “Community is aware of new 6409 (a) standard as established by Federal Communications Commission in Acceleration of Broadband Deployment by Improving Wireless Facilities Siting Policies, 80 Fed. Reg. 1238 (Jan. 8, 2015) (amending C.F.R. Part 1 and 17). (“Report & Order”).” • Staff is directed to act in compliance with the timeframes and limitations outlined in the Report and Order.  Might empower 1 person to review; nothing requires process to be ministerial or nondiscretionary; and  Might allow staff to require applicants to comply with extensive notice requirements and/or other procedural hurdles • Should any part of the Order be struck down by a court of competent jurisdiction, staff are directed to amend community practices accordingly. 22
  • 23. Telecommunications Law Model Ordinance • Engage counsel. • See National Orgs. model. • Please make sure not to incorporate into local law obligations not in place in federal law – or subject to appeal.  30 day, 10 day and deemed granted are all subject to OMB approval.  Other sections that may be overturned on appeal. 23
  • 24. Telecommunications Law Part II: Leasing Facilities to Wireless Providers 24
  • 25. Telecommunications Law Control the Drafting Process • Try to avoid using anyone else’s standard form • Wireless carriers’ standard forms are unbelievably lopsided • Wireless carriers can and will take advantage of you if you aren’t careful • Developing and using a standard form saves time and helps avoid overlooking issues 25
  • 26. Telecommunications Law Premises & Grant of Authority • Include an exhibit with legal descriptions, drawings and/or photos. • The more detail you have, the easier it is to police the agreement, especially regarding illegal collocations and subleases. • Use of common areas and access points. • Control signage. 26
  • 27. Telecommunications Law License/Lease Not Easement • Granting an easement may be granting others access to same property. • License is all the legal authority a wireless carrier needs. • Lease structure is also an acceptable alternative (but grants exclusive use, not shared use). 27
  • 28. Telecommunications Law Term • For general leases, define term and renewal options. • For wireless sites, typically series of 5 year terms – 20 to 30 years total. • Strategic decision re auto renewals or affirmative notice required.  If notice is required, keep a database of renewal dates. 28
  • 29. Telecommunications Law Term (cont’d) • Beware of “options to lease” tying up sites with no guarantee of rent. • Avoid long delivery or construction periods for permitting with no rent. Begin term immediately and add construction period to overall term. • 30-60 days or commencement of construction, whichever comes first. 29
  • 30. Telecommunications Law Due Diligence Period • Limited time in which wireless carrier has to obtain legal clearances and ensure that site works for them. • DON’T give this time away for free. • Be sure to get indemnity for any activities on site by licensee/consultants and require prior consent for any borings; require copies of any consultant reports be provided to you. 30
  • 31. Telecommunications Law Rent/License Fee • Basic fee • Collocation fees (or address this later) • Late Fees, Interest and Hold-Over fees  Late fees are what you can get.  Interest limited by law (be sure to include savings clause to avoid usury claim).  Hold-over rent should be in the range of 125% to 150% of then-current rent. 31
  • 32. Telecommunications Law Wireless Site Base Rent • $1.8k per month to $5K + per month, paid in advance. • Offer a direct deposit option. • Carriers typically offer low escalators – e.g., 15% every 5 years • Try for 4%. • Consider CPI with a floor of 3.5% and ceiling of 5%. 32
  • 33. Telecommunications Law Assignment • Require landlord approval  Wireless carriers usually want to be able to shift sites to related corporate entities without landlord approval.  Beware of assignments to “affiliates,” tower operating companies. • No release of original entity 33
  • 34. Telecommunications Law Assignment or Subletting • No sublicensing without permission.  Have licensee waive rights under Cal. Civil Code §§ 1995.260, 1995.270.  §6409 / 47 U.S.C. § 1455 regarding collocations does not affect contractual restrictions. • Licensor may refuse to consent to any proposed sublicense that involves the collocation of another carrier’s facilities.  Additional rent for sublicensees. 34
  • 35. Telecommunications Law Interference • Ensure that you do not cause any challenges for any existing tenants. • Ensure that subsequent tenants/collocators do not cause interference. • Burden is on newcomers to cure interference caused by their arrival (not existing users). • Be sure licensor/landlord is not responsible for interference or cure. 35
  • 36. Telecommunications Law Improvements • Detailed plans with prior approval  Do not agree to “approval not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned”  Control appearance of improvements • All work by licensee shall be performed in compliance with applicable laws and ordinances • Licensee is not authorized to contract for, or on behalf of licensor, or impose any additional expense 36
  • 37. Telecommunications Law Improvements & Utilities • Be sure improvements will be maintained and upgraded to comply with laws, but any new installations must not be heavier, greater in capacity or space than originally granted. • Licensee pays for utilities; licensor/landlord not responsible for any interruptions. • Do not agree to allowing licensee to use your electric connection with a sub-meter. 37
  • 38. Telecommunications Law Removal of Improvements • Think about how to handle this – may depend on facility type • Immediate ownership (e.g., of light pole) • Automatic conveyance of ownership to licensor • Option for licensor to retain improvements or require removal • Require removal of footings and foundations 38
  • 39. Telecommunications Law Technical Standards • Licensee agrees to comply with all applicable governmental laws and regulations and with such technical standards as may from time to time be established by licensor for the premises, including, without limitation, technical standards relating to frequency compatibility, radio interference protection, antenna type and location and physical installation. 39
  • 40. Telecommunications Law Limit Access (Think Post-9/11) •24-hour notice •Escort •Emergency conditions for access 40
  • 41. Telecommunications Law Access Rights/Security • If installation on roof, limit access to certain specific areas; require your roof contractor to approve; avoid roof penetrations which may invalidate roof warranties; limit cabling access to common shafts • Limit size, weight and frequency of access to roof • If installation across private or limited access land, limit access and protect fencing, private or municipal property or animals • Put burden to maintain secure fencing on licensee 41
  • 42. Telecommunications Law Events of Default/Termination by Licensor • Non-payment • Habitual late payments • Violation of any term, including non-permitted collocations • Bankruptcy 42
  • 43. Telecommunications Law Termination by Licensee • Carefully define when licensee can terminate. • Wireless carriers want ability to terminate for “technological, economic, or environmental” reasons. • Either prohibit volitional terminations or require payment (e.g., rent for remainder of term or 12-24 months of rent). 43
  • 44. Telecommunications Law Casualty/Insurance/Indemnity • Make sure to run by your risk assessment folks. • Typical insurance is general liability, auto liability, employer’s liability, all-risk property, and workers’ comp. • Make sure insurance requirements apply to contractors and subs. • Don’t accept reciprocal indemnity. 44
  • 45. Telecommunications Law Taxes • Make sure it is clear that taxes due are in addition to rent. • Address possessory interest tax (Revenue and Taxation Code 107.6) liability for licensee. 45
  • 46. Telecommunications Law Notices • All notices, requests, demands and other communications to be in writing and delivered to specified addresses. • Make sure your counsel is copied. 46
  • 47. Telecommunications Law Quiet Enjoyment, Title and Authority • Traditional obligation of the landlord. • Make sure you have authority – i.e. make sure such use is permitted under your governing documents. 47
  • 48. Telecommunications Law Hazardous Substances • Strict language to prohibit any such uses. • Batteries for back-up and generators can trigger these terms. • Check with your environmental folks for most recent terms – pay special attention that these substances do not prejudice your ability to use the site in the future. 48
  • 49. Telecommunications Law Miscellaneous • Attorney fees • Entire agreement • No liability for broker/agent fees • Governing law and venue • Severability 49
  • 50. Telecommunications Law Miscellaneous (cont’d) • Mortgage subordination • Limitation on liability • RF signage and notices • Amendments • No relocation assistance • TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE 50
  • 51. Telecommunications Law Selling Your Wireless Leases • Numerous tower operators seeking to buy landlord lease rights. • Typically offer fraction of NPV of lease payments. • Will emphasize threat of nonrenewal, certainty of being paid. • May ask for amendments allowing unlimited collocations. 51
  • 53. Telecommunications Law 53 Joseph Van Eaton Joseph.VanEaton@bbklaw.com Best Best & Krieger 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 5300 Washington, DC 20006 Phone: (202) 785-0600 Fax: (202) 785-1234 Cell: (202) 486-0770 Website: www.bbklaw.com Contact Information Gerard Lavery Lederer Gerard.Lederer@bbklaw.com Best Best & Krieger 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 5300 Washington, DC 20006 Phone: (202) 785-0600 Fax: (202) 785-1234 Cell: (202) 664-4621 Website: www.bbklaw.com 53